New Tweets

South Asia Rare gem: Was Hinduism Invented? Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction of Religion

G  South Asia
South Asia Rare gem: Was Hinduism Invented? Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction of Religion
12
326
More threads by ThunderCat

ThunderCat

Pakistan Military Moderator
Moderator
432
213
Origin

Date of Event: Apr 1, 2005
Source : https://academic.oup.com/book/6283?login=false Short Summary: Was Hinduism Invented? Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction of Religion
A rare book on the fictional concept of "hinduism" and how the British invented it over time https://academic.oup.com/book/6283?login=false

Is “Hinduism” a legitimate term for the widely varying religious practices of India that are commonly called by that name? The appearance of “religion” as a category comprising a set of practices and beliefs allegedly found in every culture dates from the modern period, emerging as Europe expanded trade abroad and established its first colonial relations in the 17th and 18th centuries. Hinduism emerged in the encounter between modernity’s greatest colonial power, Great Britain, and the jewel of her imperial crown, India.

Around the turn of the 19th century, officials of the British colonial state and Christian missionaries helped cement the idea that regional and sectarian traditions in India possessed a sufficient coherence to be construed as a single, systematic religion. This encounter was deeply shaded by the articulation and development of the concept of “religion”, and it produced the now common idea that Hinduism is a unified religion.

The Bengal Presidency, home of Calcutta — capital of colonial India and center of economic gravity in the eastern hemisphere — emerged as the locus of ongoing and direct contact between Indians and colonial officials, journalists, and missionaries. Drawing on a large body of previously untapped literature, including documents from the Church Missionary Society and Bengali newspapers, this book presents a portrait of the process by which “Hinduism” came into being. It argues against the common idea that the modern construction of religion in colonial India was simply a fabrication of Western Orientalism and missionaries.

Rather, it involved the active agency and engagement of Indian authors who interacted, argued, and responded to British authors over key religious issues such as image-worship, satī, tolerance, and conversion. This book retells the story of Christians’ and Hindus’ reception of each other in the early 19th century in a way that takes seriously the power of their religious worldviews to shape the encounter itself and help produce the very religions that colonialism thought it “discovered”. While post-colonial theory can illuminate issues of power and domination, the history of religions reminds us of the continuing importance of the sacred and spiritual dimensions of the peoples under colonial rule.
 
Last edited:
A rare book on the fictional concept of "hinduism" and how the British invented it over time https://academic.oup.com/book/6283?login=false
Not a fan of that word "Hinduism", not legit at all.

The Raj did inadvertently help us coalesce into an entity and galvanize around the idea of a singular theistic tradition but in reality it was always too vast, the many schools, doctrines and traditions of the old Vedic ways.

Its all very different from the 3 monotheistic Abrahamic faiths, which have far fewer schools and subdivisions of the doctrine. Those concepts are relatively easy to grasp. Here it goes into a lot of esoterica and philosophy.

Yahan, panco "atheism" ke bhi 50 alag schools hai :LOL:

Huge subject, I'm far from the most qualified on it but we could discuss further if you wish.

but its just sort of stuck, and nobody cares much, and that includes us..

As a mostly atheist type banda, you're free to call us what you will, man 🤝
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not a fan of that word "Hinduism", not legit at all.

The Raj did inadvertently help us coalesce into an entity and galvanize around the idea of a singular theistic tradition but in reality it was always too vast, the many schools, doctrines and traditions of the old Vedic ways.

Its all very different from the 3 monotheistic Abrahamic faiths, which have far fewer schools and subdivisions of the doctrine. Those concepts are relatively easy to grasp. Here it goes into a lot of esoterica and philosophy.

Yahan, panco "atheism" ke bhi 50 alag schools hai :LOL:

Huge subject, I'm far from the most qualified on it but we could discuss further if you wish.

but its just sort of stuck, and nobody cares much, and that includes us..

As a mostly atheist type banda, you're free to call us what you will, man 🤝

Naga_Sadhu_-_Gangasagar_Fair_Transit_Camp_-_Kolkata_2013-01-12_2790.JPG
Do you have insight into Mr Sharma's thinking? Ye 'opponents' ke baaton mein bahut haan mein haan milata hai. Why does he do it? Tactics or annoyance or sarcasm or does he really agree when he makes 'You are right' posts?

@Vsdoc @Paitoo @Guru Dutt @Lulldapull @Krishna with Flute @Dogun18 @Mrloveday @Cryptonian
 
Not a fan of that word "Hinduism", not legit at all.

The Raj did inadvertently help us coalesce into an entity and galvanize around the idea of a singular theistic tradition but in reality it was always too vast, the many schools, doctrines and traditions of the old Vedic ways.

Its all very different from the 3 monotheistic Abrahamic faiths, which have far fewer schools and subdivisions of the doctrine. Those concepts are relatively easy to grasp. Here it goes into a lot of esoterica and philosophy.

Yahan, panco "atheism" ke bhi 50 alag schools hai :LOL:

Huge subject, I'm far from the most qualified on it but we could discuss further if you wish.

but its just sort of stuck, and nobody cares much, and that includes us..

As a mostly atheist type banda, you're free to call us what you will, man 🤝

Naga_Sadhu_-_Gangasagar_Fair_Transit_Camp_-_Kolkata_2013-01-12_2790.JPG

Hinduism is not a singular, rigid doctrine but a vast and evolving collection of ethos, philosophies, and cultural traditions that have developed over thousands of years. Unlike many organized religions, Hinduism does not have a single founder, book, or central authority. Instead, it is a Sanatana Dharma (eternal way of life) that has absorbed and refined diverse thoughts, practices, and customs over millennia.

Hinduism is not just a religion but a philosophical and spiritual inquiry into the ultimate truth (Satya). Unlike dogmatic faiths like Abrahamic Religions, which are mother of many evils today's society is facing, Hinduism emerged from the continuous exploration of reality, consciousness, and existence, free from preconceived bias or prejudice.
 
Hinduism is not a singular, rigid doctrine but a vast and evolving collection of ethos, philosophies, and cultural traditions that have developed over thousands of years. Unlike many organized religions, Hinduism does not have a single founder, book, or central authority. Instead, it is a Sanatana Dharma (eternal way of life) that has absorbed and refined diverse thoughts, practices, and customs over millennia.

Hinduism is not just a religion but a philosophical and spiritual inquiry into the ultimate truth (Satya). Unlike dogmatic faiths like Abrahamic Religions, which are mother of many evils today's society is facing, Hinduism emerged from the continuous exploration of reality, consciousness, and existence, free from preconceived bias or prejudice.
Indeed, one is truly mukt

take meat eating for example.. widely accepted as some kind of religious diktat when it is in fact, far from.

cow is also not "holy" (sorry bro)

bull hai main

---------

thing is, like I said, soo many schools of thought/philosophy/tradition/mythology.. aaj kal kisi ko koi idea hi nahi hai..

bloody xutias just aping Abrahamic "halal/haram/kosher this that" bakwas.. Chinese copy style.
 
Indeed, one is truly mukt

take meat eating for example.. widely accepted as some kind of religious diktat when it is in fact, far from.

cow is also not "holy" (sorry bro)

bull hai main

---------

thing is, like I said, soo many schools of thought/philosophy/tradition/mythology.. aaj kal kisi ko koi idea hi nahi hai..

bloody xutias just aping Abrahamic "halal/haram/kosher this that" bakwas.. Chinese copy style.

If you or anybody say that cow is not holy, I can feel sorry for him so far as Sanatan's knowledge is concern. Batter not to vent opinion on subject who is not well versed
 

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle Create REPLY