Militarypedia - Global Defense Hub

Unread Posts

    • Wow (+2)
World India to push for international financial measures against Pakistan

Bagheera0084
India to push for international financial measures against Pakistan, source says

Reuters

May 23, 2025

23142958742b5ab.jpg


India will push the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global financial crime watchdog, to add arch-rival Pakistan to its “grey list”, a top government source in New Delhi said on Friday.

Pakistan was taken off the FATF grey list in 2022, boosting its reputation among lenders - which is essential for the crisis-hit economy.

India will also oppose upcoming World Bank funding for Pakistan, amid renewed tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, the government source said.


Click to expand...
↑ Reply
↑ Reply

[🇮🇳] Pushing the war in next domain: India develops technology to jam, GPS and beidou signals. Game over

Krishna with Flute
Pushing the war in next domain: India develops technology to jam, GPS and beidou signals. Game over

Pakistani, Chinese missiles and and planes to bling. India to Jam GPS Beidou signals in the area. Missiles, planes and cruise missiles to go blind. There will be no signal to guide Chinese and Pakistani weapons to target.

Game will over before it starts.

Click to expand...
↑ Reply
↑ Reply

[🇧🇩] Bangladesh as a peace broker to establish peace in South Asia.

Saif
What role can Bangladesh play in securing peace in South Asia?

1747960593366.png

VISUAL: SIFAT AFRIN SHAMS

The South Asian region has long been a theatre of enduring geopolitical tensions. Central to this is the perpetual rivalry between two nuclear-armed states: India and Pakistan. Their antagonism is cyclical, manifesting in military skirmishes, diplomatic stand-offs, and proxy conflicts. Amid this volatility, Bangladesh, though smaller in size, holds a strategically pivotal position that offers both opportunities and responsibilities in shaping regional peace.

The legacy of Bangladesh's late President Ziaur Rahman remains significant when discussing the regional peace architecture. It was under his leadership that the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was conceived—a bold attempt to facilitate dialogue and cooperation among South Asian nations. At a time when India and Pakistan remained at odds, Zia's vision provided smaller countries with a platform to assert their identities and strategic interests independently.

Over time, this initiative lost its momentum, largely due to growing Indian influence in regional diplomacy. This shift diluted the very balance that once allowed Bangladesh to act as a neutral and independent voice. Recent democratic movements, especially the mass uprising of July, have sparked renewed interest in reviving SAARC and Bangladesh's mediating role—this time led by interim leadership under Professor Muhammad Yunus.

However, Bangladesh's role in regional peace must go beyond ceremonial diplomacy. The country has the potential to become a nucleus of new geopolitical equations, as war today is not confined to just borders; rather, it extends to economic systems, democratic institutions, and national identities. In this context, small states like Bangladesh face four key challenges: preserving political neutrality, ensuring national security, maintaining diplomatic balance, and sustaining economic resilience. These challenges must be tackled holistically, grounded in theory and practical statecraft.

From an international relations perspective, the theories of realism, liberalism, and constructivism offer distinct frameworks for understanding how Bangladesh can chart its foreign policy. Realism emphasises power dynamics and survival, seeing the international system as anarchic and inherently prone to conflict, where states prioritise their security and interests. Liberalism, in contrast, advocates cooperation, institutions, and interdependence, suggesting that peace can be achieved through dialogue and mutual understanding, where shared interests guide international relations. Meanwhile, constructivism prioritises national identity, values, and historical memory, emphasising how collective ideas and self-perception influence foreign policy decisions.

In Bangladesh's case, shaped by its Liberation War, democratic aspirations, and the recent student uprising of July 2024, the constructivist approach resonates most strongly. By embracing its identity as a peace-seeking, democratic nation, Bangladesh has the potential to offer both a moral and strategic counterbalance to the power struggles in its region.

If Bangladesh can act as a catalyst in reviving SAARC, mediating between India and Pakistan, and promoting peaceful coexistence, it would set a precedent for the role of smaller states in conflict resolution. The present leadership—emerging from a popular uprising—has the historic opportunity to steer the region away from conflict and towards reconciliation. The aim must be to ensure that peace, not war, defines the subcontinental narrative.

Redefining strategic posture

Realism teaches that in times of regional conflict, smaller nation-states typically choose one of three paths: neutrality, balancing, or bandwagoning. Neutrality, as demonstrated by Switzerland and Sweden during World War II, allows smaller countries to preserve their internal stability by avoiding alignment with warring parties. Balancing, adopted by countries such as South Korea and Taiwan, involves seeking security through strategic alliances with more powerful nations. On the other hand, bandwagoning entails aligning with the stronger power for protection, though this strategy risks eroding diplomatic autonomy and independence.

Bangladesh, to maintain its sovereignty and strategic flexibility, must judiciously blend neutrality and balanced alliances without succumbing to dependency. From a liberal standpoint, Bangladesh can use regional institutions and multilateral platforms to mediate, reduce tension, and maintain diplomatic channels with both India and Pakistan. ASEAN-style diplomacy, as practised by Malaysia and Singapore, offers an effective model. Such a middle-ground strategy enables smaller states to act as peace brokers while expanding their global legitimacy.

Constructivism emphasises moral positioning and national identity. Bhutan, for instance, has maintained neutrality in Sino-Indian conflicts based on its cultural philosophy and non-aligned foreign policy. Similarly, Bangladesh's stance—rooted in the Liberation War, popular uprisings, and its resistance to autocracy—provides a solid foundation for a principled foreign policy that supports peace and justice over partisanship.

Besides, history provides numerous examples of small states effectively navigating conflicts around them. After Yugoslavia's disintegration, countries like Croatia and Slovenia emerged as sovereign states with significant international support. In Lebanon, neutrality during prolonged regional tensions was paired with reliance on UN peacekeeping missions. Latin American nations have also responded to neighbouring conflicts with economic diplomacy rather than militarisation.

Given the volatile nature of South Asian geopolitics, Bangladesh must adopt a multi-layered approach that begins with maintaining diplomatic neutrality by advocating international cooperation in addressing potential refugee crises, economic shocks, and regional insecurity. Alongside this, a recalibration of security is essential. Bangladesh needs to reassess its existing defence agreements and strategic partnerships to strengthen national defence capabilities without compromising its sovereignty or falling under external hegemony. Economic diversification is also crucial; by building resilient trade routes and sustaining balanced bilateral relations with both India and Pakistan, Bangladesh can better insulate itself from regional instability. Lastly, a firm moral commitment is indispensable. Upholding human rights, advancing peace advocacy, and adhering to international law will not only reinforce the country's international credibility but also contribute to durable and principled diplomacy.

As the second-largest economy in South Asia, Bangladesh's influence and global acceptance are growing—and with that comes responsibility. As India and Pakistan continue their zero-sum rivalry, Bangladesh must maintain a careful, prudent stance that reflects wisdom rather than warlike sentiment. Historical experiences show that Bangladesh's most potent political transformations have emerged from democratic mass movements. The July Uprising reinforced the strength of people's unity and resistance to external domination. But such victories must now be translated into stability, not further confrontation.

A worrying trend in recent years has been the rise of digitally manipulated hostility. Social media posts, misinformation campaigns, caricatures, and doctored content—often traced back to obscure or foreign-funded sources—seek to provoke anti-India sentiment or misrepresent Bangladesh on international platforms. Ironically, many of these campaigns serve interests within India itself, aiming to legitimise aggression through manufactured consent. In such an environment, Bangladesh must resist the temptation to react emotionally. Strategic patience, defence without aggression, and cool-headed diplomacy are the most effective tools against provocation.

As regional tensions rise, Bangladesh needs to institutionalise a proactive approach to crisis management. Establishing a strategic crisis management cell to anticipate and respond to potential geopolitical shocks can be vital. This cell would monitor emerging threats, such as border conflicts, refugee crises, or economic disruptions, and ensure a swift and coordinated national response. By streamlining decision-making processes and improving inter-agency cooperation, this entity can strengthen Bangladesh's ability to manage crises effectively. In addition to safeguarding national security, such a cell can bolster international trust by demonstrating Bangladesh's commitment to stability and preparedness in a volatile region. Through strategic planning and crisis foresight, Bangladesh can better navigate complex regional dynamics and assert itself as a reliable partner in international affairs.

Being a small state does not mean being a passive observer. Bangladesh has the potential to become a regional leader in peace-building by drawing on its history, values, and strategic location. With the right policies, moral compass, and institutional frameworks, it can transform its geopolitical vulnerability into a position of influence. As India and Pakistan continue their chess game of conflict, Bangladesh can and must choose the path of construction, dialogue, and peace. That will not only preserve its own sovereignty but serve as a guiding light for a troubled region.

Alauddin Mohammad is joint member secretary at the National Citizen Party (NCP), and executive director at the Institute of Policy, Governance and Development (IPGAD).​
Click to expand...
↑ Reply

[🇧🇩] Ordinance to Rehabilitate July Uprising Heroes/Families

Saif
Ordinance approved to rehabilitate July uprising heroes, families

1747959895818.png

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus presides over the 29th meeting of the advisory council at the CA office in Dhaka's Tejgaon on Thursday, May 22, 2025. Photo: PID

The advisory council today gave a final approval of the "July Mass Uprising Martyrs' Families and Injured Students-Citizens Welfare and Rehabilitation Ordinance, 2025".

The approval was given following vetting of the Legislative and Parliamentary Affairs Division at the 29th meeting of the council of advisers with Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus presiding at the CA office in the capital.

A press release of the Cabinet Division said the council of advisers also gave approval of several other issues that included the draft of the "Protection and Conservation of Fish (Amendment), 2025" and the memorandum of understanding (MoU) on cooperation between Bangladesh and the Netherlands over naval defence equipment.​
Click to expand...
↑ Reply

[🇹🇷] Turkey vs Greece

Saif
Greece says Turkey must lift war threat to get access to EU defence funds

REUTERS
Published :
May 22, 2025 18:39
Updated :
May 22, 2025 18:39

1747957505179.png

Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan meet on the sidelines of NATO Summit, in Washington, United States, July 10, 2024. Photo : Dimitris Papamitsos/Greek Prime Minister's Office/Handout via REUTERS/Files

Turkey must lift a 30-year old war threat against Greece if it wants Athens to consent to Ankara accessing European Union defence funds, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said on Thursday.

Greece and Turkey, NATO allies but historic foes, have been at odds for decades over a range of issues from airspace to the extent of their maritime boundaries and ethnically-split Cyprus.

In 1995, the Turkish parliament declared a "casus belli", or cause for war, if Greece unilaterally expanded its territorial waters beyond six nautical miles in the Aegean Sea.

"If Turkey wishes access into European defence financing tools, the legitimate concerns of both Greece and Cyprus should be taken into account," Mitsotakis said, referring to projects such as the EU's new flagship arms-buying fund, Security Action for Europe (SAFE).

"It has been 30 years since the Turkish National Assembly voted on the infamous casus belli. I think that 30 years later, the time has come to directly ask our Turkish friends to take it off the table," he told Skai radio.

Mitsotakis said he would convey the message to Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan soon, citing improved bilateral ties.

The Turkish government was not immediately available for comment.

Asked about Greece trying to keep Turkey away from EU defence projects, a Turkish defence ministry source said earlier that any attempts to disregard Turkey's importance for European security were bound to fail.

"Carrying bilateral disputes to multilateral platforms and putting forth an approach aimed at excluding our country is both a step that is not taken with good intentions, and not a smart one," the source said.

Ankara and Athens have been exploring whether they can start talks aimed at demarcating their maritime zones. Mitsotakis said that a high-level meeting between the two countries will take place in the coming months.​
Click to expand...
↑ Reply
↑ Reply
↑ Reply

[🇮🇳] Queries on Doctor's predictions

Bagheera0084
On Original PDF, Doctor made this comment:

"Muslim areas will not be allowed to coalesce. Properties and resales are carefully controlled."

Below is the complete post:

padamchen said:
200 million can do a lot of damage.

But that will be tipping over the point of no return.

Both sides will stop well short of that point

Muslims are being isolated and herded into pockets for 40+ years now.

Each pocket has a larger Hindu counterforce neutralising it.

Local area dominance.

Muslim areas will not be allowed to coalesce. Properties and resales are carefully controlled.

The Muslims do the same. But their main interest is fortification against riots.

So they are herded. Into areas where they can be dominated.

Delhi is different. Older communities. So are some cities like Hyderabad and in Karnataka.

Eventual screw will be economic.

Can the large percentage of Muslim lower class survive on community dole and patronage alone without Hindu money?

Sanghis think not.

I think they will manage. We will have more intense ghettoisation.

Muslims will come to the state only for essentials like licenses and paperwork.

@notorious_eagle
Click to expand...

My question is:

Recently the below development happened. Is this what the Doctor meant by what he said? Is this event an example of what he was describing?

I did my B.E. in an engineering college run by a 'Muslim management'. Now very recently, this college has been purchased by a 'Hindu management' and renamed (rechristen right word?) with a 'Hindu name'.

My question is as follows: Is it just a coincidence or is it part of a larger plan of 'de-Islamisation' of India?
Click to expand...
↑ Reply

[🇺🇸] Golden Dome----Anti Ballistic Missile System

Saif
MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM
Trump unveils plans for ‘Golden Dome’
China says US plan ‘undermines global stability’

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he had selected a design for the $175-billion Golden Dome missile defense shield and named a Space Force general to head the ambitious program aimed at blocking threats from China and Russia.

The program, first ordered by Trump in January, aims to create a network of satellites, perhaps numbering in the hundreds, to detect, track and potentially intercept incoming missiles.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, when asked about the project at a regular press conference yesterday, said it "undermines global stability" and heightens the risks of the militarisation of outer space and an arms race.

The Kremlin indicated that President Trump's missile shield plans could force the resumption in the foreseeable future of contacts between Moscow and Washington about nuclear arms control.

On Tuesday evening, Trump told a White House press conference that US Space Force General Michael Guetlein would be the lead program manager for an effort widely viewed as the keystone to Trump's military planning.

Golden Dome will "protect our homeland," Trump said, adding that Canada had said it wanted to be part of it.

In a statement, the office of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he and his ministers were discussing a new security and economic relationship with their American counterparts.

"These discussions naturally include strengthening NORAD and related initiatives such as the Golden Dome," it added.​
Click to expand...
↑ Reply
Load more

Staff online

Members Online

Total: 499 (members: 4, guests: 495)

All Latest Posts

  • Wall
  • ⏯ Watch
  • Read
  • Post
  • Movies
  • Saved
  • States
  • Status
    • Back