MilitaryPedia - Worldwide Defense Forums

Latest Posts Latest Countries Latest Continents Q&A

    [🇮🇷] Iran VS Israel

    Iran warns of 'consequences' of Israeli attacks on Lebanon
    Agence France-Presse . Tehran 28 July, 2024, 13:56

    1722210623152.png

    Israeli security forces gather near a site where a reported strike from Lebanon fell in Majdal Shams village in the Israeli-annexed Golan area on July 27, 2024. | AFP photo
    Iran on Sunday warned Israel that any new military 'adventures' in Lebanon could lead to 'unforeseen consequences'.

    Israel blamed Tehran-backed Hezbollah for a deadly rocket strike in the Israel-annexed Golan Heights.

    'Any ignorant action of the Zionist regime can lead to the broadening of the scope of instability, insecurity and war in the region,' said foreign ministry spokesman Nasser Kanani.

    He added that Israel will be responsible for 'the unforeseen consequences and reactions to such stupid behaviour'.

    Hezbollah, which on Saturday claimed multiple attacks on Israeli military positions following a deadly raid on southern Lebanon, has denied responsibility for the rocket fire that Israeli authorities said killed 12 people including children in the Druze town of Majdal Shams.

    Kanani accused Israel of pinning the blame on Hezbollah 'to divert public opinion and world attention from its massive crimes' in the Gaza Strip, where war has raged since October 7.

    He added that Israel 'does not have the least moral authority to comment' on the deaths in Majdal Shams, on the Golan Heights which the country seized from Syria in 1967 and later annexed in a move not recognised by the United Nations.

    Iran does not recognise Israel and has made support for the Palestinian cause a centrepiece of its foreign policy since the 1979 Islamic revolution.

    The Islamic republic has hailed Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel that sparked the Gaza war but denied any involvement.​
    ↑ Reply
    ↑ Reply

      • Wow (+2)
    [🇮🇳] No surprise Pakistan sounded for ceasefire’: Air war historian Tom Cooper says conflict 'clear-cut victory' for India

    No surprise Pakistan sounded for ceasefire’: Air war historian Tom Cooper says conflict 'clear-cut victory' for India​

    The remarks come two days after India and Pakistan announced halting of military action from both sides, following the Indian DGMO being approached his Pakistani counterpart amid the intensifying conflict between the two nuclear-powered countries.​



    Austrian military historian and combat aviation analyst Tom Cooper has termed India’s recent aerial offensive against Pakistan a “clear-cut victory,” stating that the lack of a Pakistani retaliatory capability and the targeting of strategic military sites—including nuclear weapons storage facilities—decisively tilted the outcome in India’s favour.​


    Cooper, considered one of the most respected experts on air warfare globally, commented: “When one side is bombing nuclear weapons storage facilities of the other, and the other has no ability to retaliate left, then that's a clear-cut victory in my books. No surprise Islamabad 'sounded' for a ceasefire.”

    The remarks come two days after India and Pakistan announced halting of military action from both sides, following the Indian DGMO being approached his Pakistani counterpart amid the intensifying conflict between the two nuclear-powered countries.

    While Pakistani has been claiming the ceasefire as its victory, US President Donald Trump has been quick to credit for the same. However, Cooper’s assessment presents a contrasting picture of the military engagement that preceded the truce.

    While Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has hailed the ceasefire as a diplomatic and military success, attributing it to national unity and armed forces’ valour, Cooper’s remarks provide an alternative view, suggesting that the ceasefire was prompted by a military disadvantage rather than strategic parity.

    Tom Cooper has authored several authoritative books and analyses on aerial warfare in the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia. His opinions are widely followed by military observers and policymakers.

    In the context of South Asia’s complex military dynamics, Cooper’s analysis may influence global perception of the recent conflict, particularly as India positions itself as a capable and measured military power in the region.

    The Indian Armed Forces, in their press briefings, have shown several visual evidences of its strikes causing massive damage to the terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK, and then to several air bases of Pakistan in retaliatory actions.
    ↑ Reply

    [🇮🇱] Israel Is Building a Master Plan to take over the USA & The Western World to become the Next Superpower

    Israel's Ambitious Vision: A Master Plan for Global Influence

    In recent years, discussions surrounding Israel's strategic ambitions have intensified, leading to provocative assertions such as "Israel is building a master plan to take over the USA and the Western world to become the next superpower." While such claims may seem sensational, they reflect a growing concern about geopolitical dynamics and the influence of nation-states on global affairs.

    Strategic Alliances and Military Might

    Israel has long been recognized for its robust military capabilities and strategic alliances, particularly with the United States. The U.S. provides significant military aid, enabling Israel to maintain a technological edge in defense systems. This relationship has fostered a collaborative defense framework that extends beyond mere bilateral agreements; it includes intelligence sharing and joint military exercises. As Israel continues to strengthen its defense posture, it inherently increases its influence over Western nations, particularly in matters related to security and counter-terrorism.

    Economic Innovations and Cybersecurity

    Furthermore, Israel is often dubbed the "Start-Up Nation" due to its thriving tech ecosystem and innovations in fields such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and defense technologies. The country's ability to innovate has drawn the attention of global investors, including those from the U.S. and Europe, thereby enhancing its economic clout. Israel's advancements in cybersecurity, especially, position it as a crucial ally for Western nations facing cyber threats from adversaries.

    Cultural and Diplomatic Outreach

    In addition to military and economic strategies, Israel has engaged in cultural and diplomatic outreach aimed at shaping public perception and garnering support. Initiatives that promote Israeli culture, innovation, and democratic values resonate with Western audiences, helping to create a favorable image of Israel as a partner rather than a competitor.

    While the idea of Israel overtaking the USA and the Western world may be exaggerated, it underscores a complex interplay of military, economic, and cultural factors that contribute to Israel's growing influence on the global stage. As we navigate this multifaceted geopolitical landscape, it is essential to critically assess these dynamics and understand their implications for global power shifts.

    Israel and Its Global Impact: A Critical Examination

    The geopolitical landscape surrounding Israel is fraught with contention and complex narratives. Several major talking points highlight the ongoing debate regarding Israel's actions and their implications for global relations, particularly with the Western world.

    Discontent Among Global Populations

    Supporting Israel has become a polarizing issue. Many argue that this support leads to widespread dislike from various global communities, particularly in the Middle East. The perception that Western nations blindly back Israel often fuels resentment and anti-Western sentiment, suggesting that such support may ultimately be counterproductive.

    Allegations of Human Rights Violations

    Critics assert that Israel is committing acts against the Palestinian and Lebanese populations, as well as its own Muslim citizens. These actions are seen as violations of human rights, resulting in significant humanitarian crises. This perspective emphasizes the moral implications of continued support for Israel amidst accusations of oppression and violence.

    Influence Over U.S. Politics

    The claim that Israel wields considerable influence over U.S. politics through organizations like AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) is widespread. Detractors argue that this influence enables Israel to control narratives and policies that align with its interests, potentially leading to scenarios where the U.S. is positioned to act in favor of Israeli agendas.

    Economic Repercussions

    Instances like the boycott of Western products following Israel's military actions against groups like Hezbollah indicate a growing trend among Middle Eastern consumers to turn toward alternatives, such as Chinese products. This shift represents not only a rejection of Israeli policies but also a significant economic threat to Western markets, which could be perceived as part of a larger strategy to undermine Western influence.

    Cybersecurity and Espionage Concerns

    Israel's use of advanced spyware—such as Pegasus—raises serious ethical questions. Reports of surveillance on social media platforms and personal devices to gather intelligence or carry out targeted assassinations reflect a willingness to exploit technological advantages for geopolitical gains, often at the expense of privacy and civil liberties.

    Military Might and Nuclear Capabilities

    As a military powerhouse with nuclear weapons, Israel possesses the capability to strike decisively when it deems necessary. This military strength, combined with its strategic alliances, places Israel in a unique position within global politics, enabling it to exert influence over international relations.

    Geopolitical Manipulation

    Some critics suggest that Israel seeks to instigate conflict among the world's three superpowers—Russia, China, and the USA—by leveraging its global networks and alliances. This assertion posits that Israel aims to create chaos and instability, allowing it to capitalize on the ensuing power vacuum.

    Conclusion: The Future of Western Support

    The argument that supporting Israel leads to tangible benefits for Western nations is increasingly challenged. As public sentiment shifts and boycotts against Western companies become more prevalent, the narrative suggests that Israel's actions may ultimately contribute to the decline of Western influence rather than its preservation. The complex interplay of military, economic, and diplomatic factors raises critical questions about the future of global alliances and the ethical considerations surrounding support for Israel.
    ↑ Reply

    • Poll Poll
    [🇮🇳] 'Air Force to get 6 Tejas jets by March': HAL chief says GE engines delay stalled deliveries to IAF

    Will the Indian Air Force buy 6 Indian made Tejas in 2026?

    • yes

      Votes: 0 0.0%
    • no

      Votes: 0 0.0%
    • make in india......

      Votes: 1 100.0%

    The delay in delivery of the F404 engines has been a point of contention, with Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal A P Singh publicly raising concerns over the slippage in HAL's Tejas Mk-1A production schedule.​


    The Indian Air Force will receive at least six Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) by March 2026, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Chairman and Managing Director D K Sunil has confirmed, attributing delays in delivery to the U.S.-based engine supplier GE Aerospace.

    "Unfortunately, in the case of LCA Mark 1A, we have built the aircraft. As of today, we have six aircraft lined up," Sunil said in an interview to PTI Videos. "But the engine deliveries have not happened from GE Aerospace. They were to deliver the engines in 2023. Till date, we have got only one engine."

    The delay in delivery of the F404 engines has been a point of contention, with Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal A P Singh publicly raising concerns over the slippage in HAL's Tejas Mk-1A production schedule.

    According to Sunil, the production hold-up at GE Aerospace began during the Covid pandemic and was further impacted by the exit of senior engineers, causing supply chain bottlenecks.

    "Every company goes through its fair share of criticisms. It does happen," Sunil noted. "I can assure you that as of today, six aircraft are ready. There is no let-up from our side. We are building those aircraft and getting them ready and we will be in a position to deliver (by this fiscal)."

    He added that GE Aerospace is expected to supply 12 engines in the current financial year, which will allow HAL to proceed with deliveries. HAL plans to produce 16 Tejas Mk-1A jets in the following year, contingent on a steady engine supply.

    In February 2021, the Defence Ministry signed a Rs 48,000 crore contract with HAL for 83 Tejas Mk-1A jets. The government is also in the process of acquiring an additional 97 aircraft for approximately Rs 67,000 crore. These indigenous jets are expected to replace the ageing MiG-21 fighters, helping the IAF bolster its current squadron strength, which has dropped to 31 against the sanctioned 42.

    The Tejas is a single-engine, multi-role fighter designed for air defence, maritime reconnaissance, and strike missions. Sunil described the Mk-1A variant as "a world-class aircraft comprising a high-quality radar, electronic warfare suites, and an array of missiles." He added, "It has got a full complement of avionics and weapons which make the aircraft a very potent platform. It will be very good for our Air Force."

    On the export front, Sunil said multiple countries have shown interest in the Tejas and discussions are ongoing. "We are talking to many countries on Tejas. I hope we will have a breakthrough soon."
    ↑ Reply
    ↑ Reply
    ↑ Reply

    [🇵🇰] Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan:

    Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan

    Iftikhar Shirazi
    September 26, 2024

    Weapons and ammunition recovered from the terrorist after the IBO. — Photo provided by the author

    Weapons and ammunition recovered from the terrorist after the IBO. — Photo provided by the author

    Eight terrorists were killed after security forces conducted an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in the North Waziristan district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the military’s media affairs wing said on Thursday.

    According to a press release issued by Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the operation was conducted last night on the “reported presence of terrorists in the area”.

    The press release said that an intense exchange of fire took place between the security forces and Khawarij during the operation and, as a result, eight terrorists were “sent to hell”.

    While it wasn’t mentioned in the statement which terrorist group was involved in the attack, in July, the government, through an official notification, designated the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Fitna al Khawarij, while mandating all institutions to use the term khariji (outcast) when referring to the perpetrators of terrorist attacks on Pakistan.

    Director General ISPR Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry had confirmed the same a month later.

    “Weapons and ammunition were also recovered from the deceased terrorist, who remained actively involved in terrorist activities against security forces and targeted innocent civilians as well, the ISPR statement said in its press release today.

    “Sanitisation of the area is being carried out to eliminate any other Kharji found in the area as security forces are determined to wipe out the menace of terrorism from the country,” it added.

    Meanwhile, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi paid tribute to the security forces for killing terrorists.

    According to a post on the interior ministry’s X account, Naqvi said that the security forces took timely action to eliminate the terrorists.

    “Salute to the brave soldiers of the security force,” he said.

    Pakistan has lately witnessed a sharp uptick in the number of attacks targeting security forces, other law enforcement agencies, and security checkpoints, particularly in Balochistan and KP.

    Attacks escalated after the TTP broke a fragile ceasefire agreement with the government in 2022 and vowed to target security forces.

    In August, three soldiers were martyred and five terrorists were killed after security forces foiled an infiltration attempt at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in the province’s Bajaur district.

    On September 6, four terrorists were killed when they tried to attack the Frontier Corps headquarters in KP’s Mohmand district.

    On September 20, six soldiers were martyred while 12 terrorists were killed during two encounters in North and South Waziristan districts.
    ↑ Reply
    ↑ Reply ↑ Reply ↑ Reply
    ↑ Reply

    Members Online

    Back
    PKDefense - Recommended Toggle