General Whatever

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G General
General Whatever
13K
211K
More threads by ghazi

Rahul is on my ignore list except for entertainment. @ Sharma ji doesn't have the idea of that position. No true Hindu can utter even a single word against anyone who seats on those 4 thrones. People speaks a lot against swami Avimukateshwaranand ji but listen to him. Whatever he says is as per the shastra. Whatsaaiye kuccha bhi bole. No true Hindu can say utter a single word against anyone holding that position.

Puri Shankaracharya ji ki to baat hi kuccha aur hai. Great mathematician, great scholar of binary system, SC judges learn how to do justice from him, ISRO, NASA scientist consulta him for space related riddles, WB economist learns economica from him, an authority of Indian constitution in addition to being a great scholar of Indian theology.
As I thought.

So why did all 4 not go for the temple opening?
 
As per the classical definition of Nastik as per Hindu theology is "Nastiko ved Nindakah". I.e one who criticize Veda and not the one who doesn't believe in god.



Nastik ra n pure philosophical terms is "One who doesn't recognise anything except direct evidence as proof" i.e An atheist accepts only direct perception (what can be seen, experienced, or proven through observation) as valid proof, and does not accept any other authority or source of knowledge as proof.” in other word " He doesn't accept any logical deduction as proof".

Now explain me in which term do you call @Sharma Ji a Nastik?

So a nastik is a scientologist?
 

Members Online

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Back