New Tweets

General Whatever

G General
General Whatever
14K
344K
More threads by ghazi

 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
United way live. Watch something which has nothing comparable. 50 k people dance and celebrate together for 9 nights. Girls drace up beautifully for garba like bride. This is a queen of festival. Watch and enjoy.

 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
I dont give a fk.

I know your view.

Let me hear others also no?

Or do you represent all Hindus here?
only as much as you "represent" your lot.

mai bc aapko Dastur and Mobeds ka gyaan dena shuru karne ki soch bhi nahi sakta.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
Rahul is on my ignore list except for entertainment. @ Sharma ji doesn't have the idea of that position. No true Hindu can utter even a single word against anyone who seats on those 4 thrones. People speaks a lot against swami Avimukateshwaranand ji but listen to him. Whatever he says is as per the shastra. Whatsaaiye kuccha bhi bole. No true Hindu can say utter a single word against anyone holding that position.

Puri Shankaracharya ji ki to baat hi kuccha aur hai. Great mathematician, great scholar of binary system, SC judges learn how to do justice from him, ISRO, NASA scientist consulta him for space related riddles, WB economist learns economica from him, an authority of Indian constitution in addition to being a great scholar of Indian theology.
As I thought.

So why did all 4 not go for the temple opening?
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
As per the classical definition of Nastik as per Hindu theology is "Nastiko ved Nindakah". I.e one who criticize Veda and not the one who doesn't believe in god.



Nastik ra n pure philosophical terms is "One who doesn't recognise anything except direct evidence as proof" i.e An atheist accepts only direct perception (what can be seen, experienced, or proven through observation) as valid proof, and does not accept any other authority or source of knowledge as proof.” in other word " He doesn't accept any logical deduction as proof".

Now explain me in which term do you call @Sharma Ji a Nastik?

So a nastik is a scientologist?
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
only as much as you "represent" your lot.

mai bc aapko Dastur and Mobeds ka gyaan dena shuru karne ki soch bhi nahi sakta.
There is a huge difference.

The net is full of Hindus to get opinions from.

Last 15 years I am the only Zoroastrian you will find on defence forums.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
Waise @Sharma Ji

It came to me today morning, driving

Egyptian is fkn Jamahir

Ek sau ek taka
Explain this epiphany !

I don't think I seen "Egyptian" ever go on about Gamal Nasser and his brand of Arab socialism/communism.. or whatever his thing was.. Nasserism ? ba'athism ?

but haan, annoying hai, just the same as that cvnt.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle