General Forum
- Mar 7, 2024
- 125
- 18
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Note: This question cannot be asked to doctors because this question is about sabotage and malice and doctors are likely to avoid controversy by suggesting buying new cartridge (of insulin) and if the new one is also spoilt, they will make same suggestion again and again. Doctors may even suggest buying a new expensive cartridge everyday! It should be understood that doctors may not give the answer in such controversial matter, even if they know it.
I keep insulin cartridge (fitted in the pen injection) in refrigerator and take it out only for a short while for administering the injection to the patient. I check blood glucose levels readings by using the blood glucose levels monitoring device 4 times a day. Each time I do double check - once by applying spirit to skin and once without applying spirit, so that there should be no error. That means totally I do the checking 8 times a day! Only on 25% of occasions, the blood glucose levels readings are in normal range like 150-180mg/dL. All other times (that means 75% of times) I found the blood glucose levels readings to be in the range of 330mg/dL, 400mg/dL and sometimes as high as 520mg/dL! The amount of food the patient eats is moderate. The amount of insulin given is 20units in morning and 10units at night. Sometimes I increase the dose to 20units in morning and 20units at night. Often the patient urinates excessively. And the normal levels (controlled levels of 150-180mg/dL) of blood glucose readings are usually seen when there's a considerable gap between meals.
So my question is, is the insulin being tampered such that it becomes ineffective? If indeed, insulin is being tampered to make it ineffective, how is it being done? Or is the insulin cartridge simply being switched such that it works only on 25% of occasions and other times it is ineffective?
Note: This question cannot be asked to doctors because this question is about sabotage and malice and doctors are likely to avoid controversy by suggesting buying new cartridge (of insulin) and if the new one is also spoilt, they will make same suggestion again and again. Doctors may even suggest buying a new expensive cartridge everyday! It should be understood that doctors may not give the answer in such controversial matter, even if they know it.
I keep insulin cartridge (fitted in the pen injection) in refrigerator and take it out only for a short while for administering the injection to the patient. I check blood glucose levels readings by using the blood glucose levels monitoring device 4 times a day. Each time I do double check - once by applying spirit to skin and once without applying spirit, so that there should be no error. That means totally I do the checking 8 times a day! Only on 25% of occasions, the blood glucose levels readings are in normal range like 150-180mg/dL. All other times (that means 75% of times) I found the blood glucose levels readings to be in the range of 330mg/dL, 400mg/dL and sometimes as high as 520mg/dL! The amount of food the patient eats is moderate. The amount of insulin given is 20units in morning and 10units at night. Sometimes I increase the dose to 20units in morning and 20units at night. Often the patient urinates excessively. And the normal levels (controlled levels of 150-180mg/dL) of blood glucose readings are usually seen when there's a considerable gap between meals.
So my question is, is the insulin being tampered such that it becomes ineffective? If indeed, insulin is being tampered to make it ineffective, how is it being done? Or is the insulin cartridge simply being switched such that it works only on 25% of occasions and other times it is ineffective?
Note: This question cannot be asked to doctors because this question is about sabotage and malice and doctors are likely to avoid controversy by suggesting buying new cartridge (of insulin) and if the new one is also spoilt, they will make same suggestion again and again. Doctors may even suggest buying a new expensive cartridge everyday! It should be understood that doctors may not give the answer in such controversial matter, even if they know it.
