☕ Buy Us a Coffee to Support Us ☕ Support
[🇧🇩] - Ousted PM Hasina sentenced to death | PKDefense - Home

[🇧🇩] Ousted PM Hasina sentenced to death

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Ousted PM Hasina sentenced to death
7
66
More threads by Saif

Saif

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2024
Messages
15,482
Nation

Axis Group

TRIBUNAL VERDICT OVER UPRISING-TIME CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Ousted PM Hasina sentenced to death

• Ex-home minister Kamal gets capital punishment • Then IGP Mamun's penalty commuted to 5yrs in jail • Govt ordered to confiscate convicts' property

GULAM RABBANI
Published :
Nov 18, 2025 00:21

1763428795562.webp


Bangladesh's ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina was Monday sentenced to death for the "crimes against humanity" committed during the July-August mass uprising last year that toppled her government.

In its verdict telecast live, the International Crimes Tribunal-1 (ICT-1) in Dhaka also handed down capital punishment to former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal but commuted the penalty to then inspector-general of police (IGP) Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun for "full disclosure" of the offences as a penitent approver.

The court also ordered confiscating all the property of Hasina and Kamal in favour of the state, and to give adequate compensation to the martyr families and July survivors in consideration of their losses.

A three-member bench of the tribunal, headed by its Chairman Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, delivered the verdict in the prime case of committing crimes against humanity during the uprising. The two other members of the bench are Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and former District and Sessions Judge Md Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury.

Hasina and Kamal have been absconding and tried in absentia while Mamun is in custody and pleaded guilty. The then police chief also becomes an approver or state witness in the tribunal, set up in 2010.

According to the judgment, Hasina, 78, who is now in India, was sentenced to death under charge no 2 on three counts of crimes.

The offences involve directing the use of lethal weapons, deploying helicopter and drones, the shooting and killing of six unarmed protesters in Dhaka's Chankharpool on August 5 last year, and the shooting of six student protesters in Ashulia the same day, five of whom were later burned after death, while the sixth was allegedly set on fire while still alive.

Hasina was also sentenced to imprisonment unto natural death on another three counts under Charge No 1. The offence counts include incitement and orders to kill the protesters, as well as failure to prevent the atrocities that occurred during the mass uprising.

Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal also received the death penalty on three counts under Charge No 2, which involved his abetment and failure to prevent the shooting and killing of six unarmed protesters in Dhaka's Chankharpool on August 5 last year, as well as the shooting of six student protesters in Ashulia the same day. Five of the students were later burned after death, while the sixth was allegedly burnt alive.

The tribunal states that the former Home Minister and the former IGP committed the same offences by abetting the crimes carried out during the mass uprising, and that the IGP was also liable to receive the highest punishment for his actions. However, the tribunal decided to impose a more "lenient sentence" on him, noting that he had contributed to the trial proceedings by making a "truthful disclosure" of the facts.

"He was involved in all the crimes committed during the 36-day movement. He should receive the highest punishment for his actions. However, we acknowledge that he made a full disclosure of the crimes to the tribunal and contributed to the trial proceedings," the tribunal says.

In an instant reaction Attorney-General Md Asaduzzaman said the martyrs, the state and the prosecution received justice.

He further told the press: "We believe this verdict is a landmark decision in fulfilling our responsibility to the martyrs, to the country, to the people, to the Constitution, to the rule of law, and to future generations. This verdict will bring peace and it is a message for the future. It will stand as a milestone for justice and the rule of law in Bangladesh."

Chief Prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam says the government can take two steps to bring back the two absconding accused from India. It can either request the Indian government to hand them over under the existing extradition treaty, or seek their return through Interpol in order to implement the verdict.

State defence counsel Md Amir Hossain says he was distressed, as his client received the highest punishment in the case. He says he has no locus standi to file an appeal because his clients are fugitives.

Families of those killed and injured during the July uprising welcome the death sentences handed down to the deposed prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, calling the verdict a long-awaited step toward justice. They also urge the government to ensure the verdict is carried out "swiftly".

In his reaction, Mir Mahbubur Rahman Snigdho, the twin brother of July martyr Mir Mahfuzur Rahman Mugdho, says the martyr families agreed with the death sentences for Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal but rejected Mamun verdict.

"We will appeal to the higher court. He must receive at least life imprisonment," he told the reporters on the high-security ICT premises.

He notes that delivering a verdict is not enough-the government must also clarify how it intends to bring back Hasina and Kamal.

The tribunal, headed by the presiding judge, Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, began reading out portions of the 453-page judgment around 12:30pm, amid tight security and a packed courtroom.

The tribunal states that the offences committed by the accused constitute crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute. It further says, "Justice must not be denied."

The witnesses and evidences produced in the tribunal were enough to prove the crimes against the accused. The genuineness of the video and audio clips was beyond question and 54 witnesses were enough to prove the charges.

Law-enforcement personnel, including members of the Bangladesh Army, were deployed on the tribunal premises. Prosecutors, defence counsel, visitors, and journalists were allowed entry only after thorough security checks.

Pronouncement of the verdict was broadcast live with the permission of the tribunal.

Before delivering the order portion, the tribunal said, "The prosecution prayed to give decision over Awami League activities in the verdict. However, the tribunal isn't inclined to discuss the issue in the verdict as it is not the matter involved in the case."

The tribunal had declared the end of the trial proceedings on October 23 this year and on November 13 it set November 17 for delivering its verdict in the case.

On June 1 this year, the prosecution submitted the formal charges to the tribunal, detailing five specific crimes against humanity, including "superior command responsibility" committed during the uprising.

On all five charges, the accused are charged with crimes against humanity, including murder, attempted murder, widespread and systematic killings, incitement, provocation, aiding and abetting, conspiracy, other inhumane acts, and failure to prevent the commission of these crimes.

Provocative speech of Sheikh Hasina given at a press conference on July 14 last year at the Gonobhaban, direction to use of helicopters, drones and lethal weapons during the student-led quota movement, and implementation of that direction by the subordinates to former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal and former IGP Chowdhury Abdullah Al Manmun have been included in the charges.​
 

Crimes against humanity
Sheikh Hasina sentenced to death

Staff CorrespondentDhaka
Updated: 17 Nov 2025, 16: 00

1763429272936.webp

A collage of the ICT logo and Sheikh Hasina File photo

Ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been sentenced to death over two charges committed during the July mass uprising.

International Crimes Tribunal-1 delivered the verdict today, Monday. This is the first case related to killings and other crimes against humanity during the July uprising.

In the verdict, the tribunal stated that the crimes of Sheikh Hasina and two other accused have been proven. Sheikh Hasina has been sentenced to death on two charges.

Of the remaining two accused, the then Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan was also convicted to death, and the then Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun has been sentenced to five years of imprisonment.

Sheikh Hasina and the then Home Minister Asaduzzaman remain absconding and are currently in India.

Former IGP Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun is the only accused in custody and testified before the tribunal after admitting his role.

The three-member International Crimes Tribunal-1, headed by Justice Golam Mortuza Mojumdar, delivered the verdict in a packed courtroom. The other members of the tribunal are Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and Judge Md Mohitul Haque Enam Chowdhury.


The proceedings began today, Monday, at around 12:30pm. The 453-page verdict is divided into six sections.

The tribunal presented details of evidence and information of Sheikh Hasina’s crimes against humanity, obtained from various videos recorded during the July uprising.

During the proceedings, descriptions were given of the audio, video, and other evidence submitted to the tribunal, as well as statements from victims and witnesses.

Video evidence was presented showing how protesters were killed with lethal gunfire at various locations, including Dhaka’s Jatrabari, Rampura, Badda, Savar, Ashulia, and Rangpur.

1763429309717.webp


Earlier, excerpts from reports published by various international organisations on human rights violations during the uprising were read out.

Around 1:15pm, telephone conversations between Sheikh Hasina and various people during the uprising were played. A short while ago, a phone conversation between Sheikh Hasina and then Information Minister Hasanul Haq Inu was also presented.

Bangladesh Television broadcasted the verdict announcement live from the courtroom of International Crimes Tribunal-1.

A total of five charges were brought against the accused: Delivering inciting speeches; Ordering the use of lethal weapons to suppress and eliminate protesters; Shooting and killing Abu Sayed, a student of Begum Rokeya University in Rangpur; Shooting and killing six protesters in Dhaka’s Chankharpul area; and Burning six people to death in Ashulia.

Earlier, security was heightened in and around the premises of the International Crimes Tribunal centering the verdict of Sheikh Hasina who was toppled in a mass uprising on 5 August 2024.

On Monday morning, members of the armed forces, police, the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) and specialised units such as the Armed Police Battalion (APBN) were deployed extensively across the tribunal compound and its surrounding areas. Armoured military vehicles were also present.

In the morning, Mir Mahbubur Rahman Snigdha—brother of Mir Mahfuzur Rahman Mugdha, who was martyred in the July mass uprising—arrived at the International Crimes Tribunal premises, along with Dhaka University Central Students’ Union (DUCSU) Vice President Shadik Kayem, Inqilab Mancha spokesperson Sharif Osman Hadi, and several individuals injured in the July uprising.​
 

Verdict against Sheikh Hasina affirms none is above law: Chief adviser
BSSDhaka
Published: 17 Nov 2025, 22: 44

1763429428781.webp

Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus File photo

Chief adviser professor Muhammad Yunus on Monday said the conviction and sentence delivered to ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina and her associates affirm a fundamental principle that no one, regardless of power, is above the law.

“Today, the courts of Bangladesh have spoken with a clarity that resonates across the nation and beyond. The conviction and sentencing affirm a fundamental principle: no one, regardless of power, is above the law,” he said in a statement issued by his press wing tonight.

This verdict offers vital, if insufficient, justice to the thousands harmed in the uprising of July and August 2024, and to the families who still carry their loss, the chief adviser said.

“We stand at a moment of rebuilding democratic foundations wrecked by years of oppression. The crimes at issue-the ordering of lethal force against young people and children whose only weapons were their voices-violated both our laws and the basic bond between government and citizens,” he added.

Professor Yunus said these acts outraged Bangladeshis’ core values: dignity, resilience, and commitment to justice.

“As many as 1,400 lives were lost. They were not statistics but students, parents, and citizens with rights,” he said, adding that months of testimony detailed how lethal force, even from helicopters, was used against unarmed protesters.

“This verdict recognises their suffering and confirms that our justice system will hold perpetrators accountable,” the chief adviser said.

Noting that Bangladesh is now rejoining global currents of accountability, he said “The students and citizens who stood for change understood this, and many paid with their lives-giving their today for our tomorrow”.

The path ahead requires not just legal accountability but rebuilding trust between institutions and citizens, Prof Yunus said, adding, understanding why people risk everything for genuine representation-and creating systems worthy of that trust-is essential.

“Today’s verdict is a step on that journey,” he said.

“I have every confidence that Bangladesh will meet the challenges ahead with courage and humility,” the Chief Adviser added.

With commitment to the rule of law, human rights, and each person’s potential, justice will not merely survive in Bangladesh, Professor Muhammad Yunus said, adding, “It will prevail and sustain.”

Earlier, today, the International Crimes Tribunal-1 sentenced Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death for the crimes against humanity committed during the July-August 2024 mass uprising.

Alongside this, the Tribunal has awarded former IGP Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun a “lenient sentence” of five years’ imprisonment for making a full disclosure of the events and cooperating with investigators as state approver.​
 

How international media covered Hasina's sentencing at ICT
BBC, Reuters, Al Jazeera live streamed verdict

1763430077731.webp


Major international media outlets today gave significant coverage with some publishing live updates on Sheikh Hasina's verdict in a crimes against humanity case at the International Crimes Tribunal-1.

BBC, Al-Jazeera and Reuters live streamed the event and outlets such as CNN, AFP, and The Guardian also gave it prominent coverage. Indian media outlets provided regular updates throughout the day.

The BBC report titled, "Bangladesh's ousted leader Sheikh Hasina sentenced to death," said she has been sentenced to death for crimes against humanity over the crackdown on student-led protests which led to her ousting last year.

It said the verdict now poses a diplomatic challenge for India and Bangladesh.

"Dhaka has formally requested her extradition but so far India has shown no willingness to comply," it reads.

Reuters said Bangladesh's ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina was sentenced to death in her absence on Monday at the end of a months-long trial that found her guilty of ordering a deadly crackdown on a student-led uprising last year.

"People in the packed courtroom -- including families of victims -- cheered and clapped, and some in the crowds outside sank to their knees and offered up prayers after the verdict, the harshest against a leader in the country's history," it added.

Al-Jazeera too kept giving live updates for its readers throughout the day. In its highlights, it said, "The 78-year-old fugitive politician was on trial in absentia for being the 'mastermind and principal architect' behind last year's suppression of mass demonstrations, in which some 1,400 people were killed."

CNN said, "Sheikh Hasina, the ousted Prime Minister of Bangladesh, has been sentenced to death after being found guilty of crimes against humanity for the violent suppression of student protests last year that led to the collapse of her government."

A panel of three judges from the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT), Bangladesh's domestic war crimes court, delivered the verdict, ruling that Hasina was responsible for inciting hundreds of extrajudicial killings carried out by law enforcement, added the CNN report.

Indian outlet The Hindu said, a special tribunal in Bangladesh on Monday sentenced former prime minister Sheikh Hasina and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death after finding them guilty of crimes against humanity over the state crackdown on a student uprising in July-August 2024.

NDTV, meanwhile, wrote: Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal has sentenced former Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina to death in a case over alleged crimes against humanity committed during last year's student-led agitation that led to the fall of her Awami League government.

Pakistan's Dawn reported, Bangladesh's Sheikh Hasina, sentenced to death in absentia on Monday for her deadly crackdown on student protesters last year, has been a dominant figure in the South Asian nation for half a century, a career rooted in bloodshed.

Most of the global news sites also mentioned a statement from Hasina which claimed that the death penalty was the interim government's way of "nullifying Awami League as a political force" and that she was proud of her government's record on human rights.

"I am not afraid to face my accusers in a proper tribunal where the evidence can be weighed and tested fairly," the BBC quoted the statement.​
 

Hasina, Asaduzzaman sentenced to death, ex-IGP Mamun jailed in July uprising case
M Moneruzzaman 17 November, 2025, 14:58

1763431746398.webp

The International Crimes Tribunal-1 on Monday sentenced deposed prime minister and Awami League president Sheikh Hasina and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death for committing crimes against humanity during the July–August 2024 mass uprising.

Charges for jail until death

- Provoking violence by calling protesters Razakars

Charges for death penalty

  • Ordering use of drones, helicopters, lethal weapons to kill protesters,
  • Killing of six student protesters at Chankharpool,
  • Killing, burning six protesters at Ashulia

Former inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, who turned a state evidence, received a reduced sentence of five years’ imprisonment.

The tribunal said that Mamun made a ‘full and true disclosure’ of the July events and helped the judges reach a just decision.

The tribunal also ordered the confiscation of all properties belonging to Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman.

It directed the government to provide substantial compensation to the victims and ensure adequate support for the wounded, based on the seriousness of their injuries.

Though the prosecution sought a ban on the Awami League, the tribunal observed that it was not the proper case to address the issue.

Hasina and Asaduzzaman, now in hiding in India, were tried in absentia.

Mamun, who is currently in custody, heard the verdict from the dock.

Family members of several victims, present during the verdict, welcomed the death sentences for Hasina and Asaduzzaman.

They urged the government to bring the two from India to execute the verdict.

Many, however, expressed dissatisfaction over Mamun receiving a lighter sentence and said that they would file an appeal seeking enhancement of the sentence against him.

The Bangladesh foreign ministry, later on the day, reiterated its call on the Indian government to extradite Hasina and Asaduzzaman.

The interim government, on the other hand, called the death penalty handed down to Hasina and Asaduzzaman a historic verdict, and urged the people to remain calm, restrained and responsible, said a statement shared by the chief adviser’s press wing.

The tribunal tried the trio for superior command responsibility on five counts of crimes against humanity, including incitement, abetment, issuing orders, and facilitating atrocities during the 36-day movement between July 1, 2024 and August 5, 2024.

They also include abetment, conspiracy, incitement, complicity, and failure to prevent crimes such as murder, attempted murder, torture, and other inhuman acts committed during the uprising.

According to the prosecution, at least 1,500 people were killed and more than 25,000 injured in the crackdown.

The verdict was the tribunal’s first judgment, announced 11 months after investigators received complaints against Hasina on October 29, 2024.

The verdict was broadcast live, excluding the faces of the judges.

Security was tightened in and around the courtroom.

The courtroom became jam-packed with more than one hundred local and foreign journalists, prosecutors, family members of the victims, injured survivors and witnesses.

As the tribunal declared the death sentence against Hasina, a section of the audience clapped, prompting attorney general Md Asaduzzaman to request them to maintain order and celebrate outside.

The verdict came amid tight security and a tense atmosphere. Arson attacks, crude bomb explosions and flash processions by Awami League supporters have continued nationwide since November 7 following the party’s social media calls for a ‘Dhaka Lockdown’ on November 13 and a ‘complete shutdown’ in November 16–17.

The Hasina-led government was ousted from power on August 5, 2024 amid the mass uprising.

Asked how the verdict would be executed as the two convicts remain absconding, the attorney general said that the sentence would be executed once they are arrested or surrender.

He said that the law does not allow absconding convicts to appeal against the verdict.

On the question of repatriation through Interpol, he said the state would act ‘according to law.’

‘This verdict is a message for future politicians. It is also a milestone for ensuring accountability to the future generation over the July revolution,’ he said.

Chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam said that any court in the world would have delivered the same punishment if it had examined the evidence presented in the case.

‘This verdict is a reminder that no one — no matter how powerful or influential — is above the law,’ he said.

In his reaction, tribunal-appointed state defence lawyer Amir Hossain said that the verdict caused him ‘pain’ and added that he believed the judgement ‘could have been different’.

He, however, said that he accepted the verdict against his clients, Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman, though it went against them.

Amir Hossain was appointed to defend Hasina and Asaduzzaman after the tribunal had removed lawyer Aminul Gani Titu as state-defence lawyer for them. Titu had faced criticism from Hasina’s son, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, who objected on Facebook, noting that Titu had previously demanded a death sentence for Hasina in an earlier post.

Amir Hossain, known for his Awami League affiliation, served as a special public prosecutor at Dhaka Special Judge Court-8 until the law ministry dismissed all prosecutors appointed under the Awami League regime after the interim administration took office on August 8, 2024.

The three-judge tribunal delivered its 453-page judgement over nearly two and a half hours from 12:30pm.

Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, who chaired the bench, read out the court’s observations and orders.

Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood read two charges and the arguments of the prosecution and defence for Hasina and Asaduzzaman, while retired district judge Mohammad Mohitul Hoque Anam Chawdhury read out the remaining three charges and the legal aspect of the tribunal and the International Crimes Tribunals Act, 1973 and its connected international laws and statutes.

The tribunal rejected the defence argument that it lacked jurisdiction to try the July atrocities under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973. It observed that the law applies to crimes against humanity committed both before and after its enactment.

The tribunal said that the July movement was a targeted, systemic and widespread campaign of violence, noting the large number of deaths and injuries recorded across the country.

Hasina, Asaduzzaman and Mamun were tried on five counts of charges.

The first charge said that Hasina allegedly fuelled violence by calling protesters ‘sons and grandchildren of Razakars’ at a press conference at Ganabhavan on July 14, 2024.

The second charge said that the deposed prime minister allegedly informed the Dhaka University’s former vice-chancellor Maskud Kamal, and her relative Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, in separate conversations that the protesters would be ‘hanged or killed’, and authorised the use of live ammunition and drone strikes.

The third charge says that the accused allegedly ordered police and ruling party activists to fire on students at Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, killing student leader Abu Sayeed on July 16.

According to the fourth charge, six unarmed protesters were allegedly shot dead during the ‘March to Dhaka’ programme at Chankharpool.

The fifth charge said that five protesters were allegedly burnt alive near Ashulia Police Station on August 5, while another injured protester was allegedly thrown into the flames.

The tribunal found Sheikh Hasina guilty on three counts of crimes against humanity under charge number 1.

The tribunal held her responsible for incitement, issuing lethal orders, and failing to prevent or punish the attackers.

The tribunal observed that Hasina fuelled violence by calling protesters ‘sons and grandchildren of Razakars’ on July 14. She was also found guilty of ordering the deployment of drones and helicopters and the use of live weapons to kill students and other protesters.

She was additionally held liable for abetting the killing of six protesters at Chankharpool in the capital and six others at Ashulia, on the outskirts of the capital, where the victims were burnt to death.

The judges said the three counts were combined into a single sentence of death.

Asaduzzaman and Mamun were also found to have committed crimes against humanity by abetting and facilitating the killings at Chankharpool and Ashulia and by failing to prevent or punish the perpetrators.

The tribunal said that both Asaduzzaman and Mamun deserved the death penalty.

It said that Mamun admitted his involvement in the 36-day nationwide atrocities.

Considering his cooperation and the gravity of the offences, the tribunal limited Mamun’s sentence to five years, noting that his crimes were otherwise punishable by death. The tribunal said it took a ‘lenient view’ due to his contribution to the case.

On July 2, the same tribunal sentenced Hasina to six months in jail for contempt of court over a leaked phone call, made while in India, in which she allegedly said, ‘I have had 227 cases filed against me, so I have a licence to kill 227 people.’

Nine more cases are currently pending with the two International Crimes Tribunals.

ICT-1 is handling two disappearance cases involving 28 accused, including Sheikh Hasina and 13 detained serving army officers.

Hasina’s name appeared in hundreds of complaints over enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and other serious violations committed during her 15-year authoritarian rule, now pending with the ICT for investigation, according to the prosecutors.

The Awami League regime established the International Crimes Tribunal in 2010 to try individuals accused of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.

The interim government reconstituted the tribunals after the fall of the Awami League regime and amended the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973 on November 24, 2024 to prosecute those responsible for the July–August atrocities.

On October 17, the ICT-1 issued arrest warrants for Hasina, Obaidul Quader, Asaduzzaman Khan and 43 others for their alleged involvement in committing atrocities during the uprising.

The tribunal also directed the police to seek an INTERPOL red notice and later issued newspaper notices asking them to appear before the tribunal.​
 

Crimes against humanity: Sheikh Hasina’s sentence and her political demise

Given the UN’s and international organisations’ opposition to capital punishment, it will be nearly impossible to mount pressure on India through them to return Sheikh Hasina. Nevertheless, the Bangladesh government should still exert direct diplomatic pressure on India for her extradition.

Updated: 18 Nov 2025, 11: 41

1763515302901.webp


As a nation, it is profoundly tragic and deeply shameful that crimes against humanity have been committed in this state in contemporary times. Yet it is also a matter of immense pride that through a genuine mass uprising, we succeeded in toppling those responsible and compelling them to flee the country. Following their fall, the responsibility of ensuring justice for those crimes has rested upon us as a nation.

Every act of justice serves as a deterrent against the repetition of similar crimes in the future. And because Sheikh Hasina’s crimes and trial have drawn international attention, the verdict is likely to have global implications as a deterrent as well.

The allegations against Sheikh Hasina went far beyond mere killings or acts of torture; they constituted crimes against humanity. Not only during the July mass uprising, but throughout her tenure, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings were carried out systematically.

Beyond that, the planned torture of BNP (Bangladesh Nationalist Party) activists, and for a time, custodial torture, filing fabricated cases, and various forms of persecution of Jamaat-e-Islami activists also fall within the ambit of crimes against humanity.

In the verdict of the first case filed against Sheikh Hasina, she received, as widely expected, the maximum penalty, death for three of the five charges. She was sentenced to life imprisonment for the remaining two charges.

The mass uprising against Sheikh Hasina will remain an extraordinary example in world history. Unarmed civilians, relying on nothing but moral force, confronted state forces and endured unimaginable brutality. There are records of mobile phone conversations that reveal that Sheikh Hasina is coolly instructing the use of lethal force in suppressing the protests. News media such as Al Jazeera and the BBC independently carried out forensic analyses for their documentaries and confirmed that the recordings were authentic and not technologically fabricated.

The possibility that Sheikh Hasina will be brought back to Bangladesh during her lifetime to face execution currently appears remote. The way the Indian government is providing refuge and security to her, makes it almost certain that she will not be handed back.

Those who were involved in resisting Sheikh Hasina’s mafia-like system, especially the bereaved families of the dead, those who were blinded or maimed, and the injured, were naturally keeping a close watch on this trial. But we must also remember that the verdict held significance for countless political activists and apolitical citizens, who suffered repression for opposing the Awami League’s prolonged rule over 15 years (including 10 and a half years in power unlawfully), and, also for the millions whose democratic rights were eroded and who were reduced to mere subjects in their own land.

This verdict has unquestionably delivered justice. Yet one may ask: will the verdict ultimately remain merely symbolic?

The possibility that Sheikh Hasina will be brought back to Bangladesh during her lifetime to face execution currently appears remote. The way the Indian government is providing refuge and security to her, makes it almost certain that she will not be handed back. Evidence of India’s mindset may be found in the fact that despite repeated objections from Bangladesh, including from the chief adviser himself, India has not prevented Sheikh Hasina from persistently making provocative statements against Bangladesh. Even on the day before the verdict, she issued grave threats against the forces behind the uprising.

Given the UN’s and international organisations’ opposition to capital punishment, it will be nearly impossible to mount pressure on India through them to return Sheikh Hasina. Nevertheless, the Bangladesh government should still exert direct diplomatic pressure on India for her extradition. The Indian government must consider that if it seeks to develop a sustainable bilateral relationship not merely with an individual or a single party, as in the Hasina era, but with the people of Bangladesh, then it must reconsider its position on Sheikh Hasina.

Under the Rome Statute, a confirmation-of-charges hearing may in special circumstances be held in absentia, but neither the main trial nor the subsequent hearings can take place without the presence of the accused.

Some questions may arise internationally regarding Sheikh Hasina’s trial. The UN and the Western countries oppose the death penalty. Additionally, the trial of an accused in absentia for crimes such as crimes against humanity is regarded as inconsistent with international standards.

Under the Rome Statute, a confirmation-of-charges hearing may in special circumstances be held in absentia, but neither the main trial nor the subsequent hearings can take place without the presence of the accused.

We can hope that the government, particularly the chief adviser, will be able to use his international stature to manage such pressure. Commissioning a full investigation by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights will be considered as an extraordinary decision by the interim government. In its report, the OHCHR stated that crimes against humanity were committed on a large scale in Bangladesh during the July uprising, and that Sheikh Hasina was the principal decision-maker in the planning, leadership, direction, and coordination of those crimes.

Time will tell whether Sheikh Hasina can ever be brought back to face the verdict. But even if that proves impossible, the verdict has definitively sealed the end of her political future.

Discussions are ongoing regarding the possibility of trial of the Awami League as an organisation at the international court. Even if, for the sake of argument, such a tribunal were to conclude that the Awami League as an organisation is not guilty of crimes against humanity and thus is not banned, the fact remains that age does not favour Sheikh Hasina.

And even if the political context somehow permitted her return, it is virtually inconceivable that she could regain control of the party or resume leadership. At most, she may continue issuing incitements through occasional audio statements (she may avoid video messages to prevent showing her defeated appearance), which is likely to have only negative consequences for her party.

Given how well-known Sheikh Hasina and those at the centre of her power structure are, it is unsurprising that neither she nor those complicit in crimes against humanity will come close to acknowledging their guilt. But it is disheartening that a large section of the party’s supporters still have not grasped the scale and severity of the crimes committed by her and her associates. We want to hope that this verdict will prompt some of them to rethink.

People founded the state to establish a system within which all would live under a set of rules, and where breaches of those rules would be addressed through justice, thereby setting precedents for state and society. When a state fails to deliver justice, especially in cases involving crimes against humanity, it undermines its own legitimacy to administer justice in any matter. We must remember Martin Luther King’s famous dictum: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

* Zahed Ur Rahman is a teacher and political analyst​
 

A historic verdict that carries weight even in absentia
Sheikh Hasina verdict

1763515834518.webp

PHOTO:STAR

There is a curious weight in witnessing a moment that feels like the culmination of years of waiting, even if the full consequence of that moment may never be realised. The verdict on Sheikh Hasina carries precisely that weight as a symbolic punctuation to a decade of fear, suffering, and quiet endurance. In a country where power so often felt untouchable, where law could be bent to protect those with influence and destroy those without, the decision to hold Hasina accountable is not merely judicial but also personal.

To speak of justice in abstract terms is simple. Scholars debate procedure, diplomats discuss optics, international media deliberate fairness, and foreign governments weigh consequences. But those frameworks rarely capture the intimate, almost physical relief that comes from seeing a powerful figure confronted with accountability. There is a long history of people waiting in court corridors that seemed endless, of families pressing photographs into the hands of reluctant officials, of citizens carrying memories of disappeared friends, neighbours, and colleagues, and of loved ones killed in protests. Justice has often been absent, delayed, or warped to suit politics.

There is a reason why this verdict feels like a personal win. It is because we have had to live under the shadow of her choices and watch the erosion of the everyday sense of safety, the subtle conditioning of our minds, the quiet fear in public spaces, the erosion of civic confidence. Accountability, even if delayed, restores a sense of moral order. It confirms that cruelty leaves traces that the world cannot ignore indefinitely.

This is why the debates framed in diplomatic language feel insufficient. When discussions revolve around whether a death sentence complicates her extradition, whether India will cooperate, or how the United Nations will respond, they obscure the emotional reality for citizens who have spent years negotiating life under fear. For these citizens, this sentence is neither a matter of politics nor of optics; it is a matter of recognition. A recognition that public accountability is possible, even if partially. So, while the world debates the technicalities, the symbolism of the verdict cannot be overstated. For the families of the disappeared, the survivors of forced disappearances and institutionalised cruelty, the families of the around 1,400 people killed in the uprising, and thousands more injured for life, its significance is immeasurable.

There is a certain inevitability in our emotional reaction. Those of us who carried the burden of witnessing injustice or suffered directly at its hands feel a sense of vindication. It is as if, at last, the moral ledger has been balanced, even if the numbers can never fully account for the enormity of our losses. Justice, in this sense, is an echo of recognition; an affirmation that what was endured matters, that those who once felt powerless are not entirely unheard. This is historic precisely because it exists in tension with what came before. For too long, the apparatus of the state allowed selective justice to define the rules. Decisions were guided by proximity to power, by allegiance, and by fear. Ordinary citizens—the witnesses, the silent sufferers—were forced to inhabit a parallel reality: a world in which laws existed, but rarely for them. The sentence against Hasina disrupts that parallel.

Of course, there is no guarantee that this moment will translate into lasting systemic change. The procedural aftermath, the international commentary, and the political manoeuvres that follow will test the depth of this symbolic victory. However, this moment affirms that ordinary citizens, who watched power move like a tidal wave over their lives, have a stake in the moral universe that the law is meant to inhabit. Hasina's sentence does not erase any of their sufferings, but it places them in a moral context where they are no longer invisible. That alone, in a country where invisibility has often been the default condition for those outside power, is transformative.

Perhaps the most profound aspect of this moment is the way it reframes the imagination of possibility. To see accountability reach a figure perceived for so long as untouchable opens a conceptual space. It allows us to imagine a society in which systems, though flawed, are not entirely devoid of redress. It allows a generation to measure possibility not by fear alone, but by the courage and persistence of those who upheld principle until the moment of recognition arrived. The debate over fairness and proportionality is not insignificant. Legal scholars, diplomats, and international observers will continue to dissect, question, and deliberate over the technical merits of the sentence. That discourse matters in its own domain. Yet for citizens who have experienced the consequences of unchecked authority, those considerations are secondary to the emotional and symbolic resonance of accountability.

History will judge the verdict in its own way, but for those who lived under the shadow of Hasina's regime, the personal significance precedes history. In the end, the importance of the sentence rendered on Hasina is not confined to law or politics. It is a moment that will enter collective memory as proof that justice, even when deferred, can arrive—and when it does, it feels like a personal triumph for all who lived under its absence.

Maisha Islam Monamee is a graduate from the Institute of Business Administration (IBA), University of Dhaka.​
 

India responds after Bangladesh's ICT issues verdict on Hasina
New Delhi stays silent on Dhaka’s call for ousted PM's extradition

1763516809674.webp


India today said it has noted the verdict announced by the International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh concerning former prime minister Sheikh Hasina and said New Delhi remains committed to "the best interests of the people of Bangladesh".

India's Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement hours after the ICT sentenced Hasina to death for crimes against humanity during the student-led protests during the July uprising last year.

"As a close neighbour, India remains committed to the best interests of the people of Bangladesh, including in peace, democracy, inclusion and stability in that country," read the statement.

"We will always engage constructively with all stakeholders to that end," it added.

India has not made any mention of Hasina's extradition to Bangladesh, which has called upon India to do so last December.​
 

Members Online

No members online now.

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

🌙 ☀️