[🇧🇩] Chicken Neck/Siliguri Corridor

[Saif]

Source : https://bipss.org.bd/pdf/Siliguri%20Corridor%20Geostrategic%20Importance%20and%20Future%20Challenges.pdf

Siliguri Corridor and its geostrategic importance.

 

[Saif]

Why does India need Bangladesh to maintain her territorial integrity in North-East?

 

[Saif]

What if China wrings India’s ‘Chicken’s Neck’ – the Siliguri corridor? Here are some countermeasures

The Siliguri corridor, a narrow passage to India’s eight north-eastern (NE) states, is a perennial threat to our security. Strategically, it is the Achilles heel in the defence of almost 2,000 km of borders in...

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

What if China wrings India’s ‘Chicken’s Neck’ – the Siliguri corridor? Here are some countermeasures
October 9, 2019, 7:50 PM IST Mohinder Pal Singh in TOI Edit Page, Edit Page, India, World, TOI

The Siliguri corridor, a narrow passage to India’s eight north-eastern (NE) states, is a perennial threat to our security. Strategically, it is the Achilles heel in the defence of almost 2,000 km of borders in the NE states with China and Myanmar. This piece of land is about 60 km in length but a meagre 22 km in width at its narrowest point. With plain terrain not interspersed with any natural or man made obstacles, this patch makes defence a real challenge.

Undoubtedly, this 2,000 sq km stretch of land will be the prime and early target of the enemy during any confrontation. Naturally, the road corridor passing through this narrow corridor becomes a vital piece of ground which must be defended at all costs.

In 2003, India and China came to an agreement whereby China agreed to Sikkim’s addition to India and gave up all claims to the state and India recognised China’s sovereignty over Tibet. Whilst this significantly reduced the escalation in the India-Bhutan-China tri-junction region, China’s attempts to seize de facto control over the region continued. It culminated in the Doklam standoff between India and China during June-August 2017.

The threat to the Siliguri corridor (also known as Chicken’s Neck) is perennial as China has continued its overt road and airstrip construction activities on its side of the border. This could allow China to rapidly mobilise and deploy troops thereby threatening the Siliguri corridor. Furthermore, the deployment of artillery, missiles or anti-aircraft weaponry could easily jeopardise India’s efforts to resupply the region in time of war, especially considering that there is only a single railway line through the region to NE states.

Widening and strengthening this corridor is imperative. The first option for India is to enter into a treaty with Bangladesh permitting not only transit of military equipment during times of conflict but also civilian traffic and trade activities. This would add a layer of strategic depth in the region and alleviate (in some measure) concerns of the possible severance of the north-east with the mainland.

The treaty can cover multi-modal transport including road and rail and a smooth movement of freight and personnel. With the revival of Bimstec India’s relations with Bangladesh have seen a fillip, with seven pacts on important mutual issues signed during Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s recent four-day visit. India and Bangladesh have already mooted a proposal to facilitate transit with India’s landlocked north-east and PMs of both countries have issued joint statements in this regard in 2010 and 2016.

Currently, there is a joint working group which is examining the possibility of connecting Mahendraganj in Meghalaya to Hili in Bengal through Goraghat, Palashbari and Gaibandha in Bangladesh. This distance of about 100 km could easily be developed into an elevated road and rail corridor through Bangladesh. Such a corridor, if built in PPP mode can result in regular tariff to Bangladesh and provide a shot in the arm to trade and tourism in NE states.

The second option is to strengthen connectivity to the tri-junction area at Doka La so that our response as well as surveillance capability is augmented. Towards this, recent reports of converting the erstwhile mule track to Doka La into a black-top road by the Border Road Organisation and reducing the travel time from 7 hours to 40 minutes is a step in the right direction.

The third option is to make alternate transport arrangements which are safe and secure within the country itself. The development of a multi-modal transport corridor through Siliguri itself can be undertaken by India. As part of this initiative we can even build underground road tunnels which are less likely to be susceptible to air and artillery attack in a time of a military conflict.

Underground tunnelling through this vulnerable stretch, although costly, can give India a little more room to take harder militarily options, if required. Underground expressways and high speed rail connectivity through this corridor will also help to scale up the movement of civil and military traffic. This would also enhance trade and tourism of the NE region manifold during peacetime.

With some of these measures India can look to overcome the constraints imposed by geography and improve its position with regard to China.​

 

[Saif]

How Bangladesh can benefit from India’s chicken neck?

 

[Saif]

Before giving India access to our land - - observerbd.com

www.observerbd.com

Before giving India access to our land​

Published : Tuesday, 2 August, 2022 at 12:00 AM Count : 938
Md Moinuddin Chowdhury
​

The Siliguri corridor in West Bengal is known as the lifeline or chicken neck of India.The activity of China and India on this corridor is particularly noteworthy as it involves the interests of both countries.

China wants to dismantle this corridor. Because he knows that if it can do this, North East India or the Seven Sisters will be completely cut off from road and rail communication with the rest of India and consequently they will be able to reach their goal.

But India too, realizing the danger, has made military preparations long in advance to protect the corridor.

​

Because of Bangladesh's location to west of Siliguri Corridor, both China and India have tried to take Bangladesh as their side for strategic reasons since long ago and this continues even today.

India's intention was to use the land of Bangladesh as an alternative to the Siliguri Corridor to gain military and civilian advantage. On the other hand, China's intention was to take Bangladesh to its side through various cooperations.

Looking at the comments of Indian analysts according to newspaper sources, it can be said that among the various options, they have talked about taking steps to use the land of Bangladesh to protect the Siliguri Corridor.

In this context, an Indian analyst named Adarshgupta said, "India should focus on development through connectivity in the North Eastern region. He talked about signing an agreement with Bangladesh, which would allow military, civilian and traffic to be carried during the conflict."

Later it was learned that in 2020, India signed an agreement with Bangladesh to transport Indian goods from Kolkata to Agartala through Chittagong seaport.

Many feel that through this, India has found an alternative to chicken neck. But is it really true?

According to newspaper reports, while there is talk of using Bangladeshi land and ports to send Indian goods to their northeastern states, there is no agreement (Bangladesh-India) to use Bangladeshi land to transport Indian military and paramilitary forces along with their military equipment. We don't know.

However, we firmly believe that the Bangladesh government and the patriotic military will never do anything that endangers the country's independence or sovereignty, or will not give any country such an opportunity.

India is a neighbouring and friendly country of Bangladesh, the contribution of this country in our great liberation war cannot be undermined. Moreover, we are historically dependent on each other in various ways.

On the other hand, China is also our genuine and historical friend, China's contribution to the various development projects of Bangladesh including the defence sector and above all to the economic development of Bangladesh cannot be overstated.

Since both China and India are our friends, it is natural that Bangladesh will try to maintain friendly relations with them. Because Bangladesh's foreign policy follows the principle of 'friendship with all, enmity with none'.

However, it is not right to expect that the relationship between two countries will remain the same throughout life, just as human relations do not remain intact forever.

Over time, such relationships may need to be modified depending on circumstances and the global environment. For example, it is possible to strengthen China's military relations with Bangladesh, but due to different contexts and strategic reasons, it is not appropriate to establish similar relations with India and Myanmar.

Again, although China is a close friend of Bangladesh, as it has military relations with Myanmar, it is not far-sighted to make Bangladesh solely dependent on China in terms of military relations.

However, as a genuine and strategic friend of Bangladesh, we believe that China will look positively and cooperatively on Bangladesh's multi-dimensional and diversified strategy in purchasing military weapons and equipment.

However, all things considered, the activities of China and India regarding the Siliguri Corridor are strictly their internal affairs. In this case, Bangladesh should not get involved in the military conflict between the two countries.

However, considering the humanitarian aspect, I think it is expedient and profitable for the Bangladesh Government to let India (subject to fair receipts) use port and land to facilitate the import and export of their goods.

But I believe it will be considered a suicidal decision if they are given the opportunity/permission to carry (from one state to another state) their military and paramilitary forces or any military weapons and military equipment using the land of Bangladesh.

Because there will be no surprise if Indian forces suddenly attack Bangladesh by taking the opportunity to bring military forces and equipment using the land of Bangladesh.

Although I want to believe that India as a neighbouring and friendly country will never attack Bangladesh, yet as a common and conscious citizen of Bangladesh, I respectfully request the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and the patriotic military to keep a careful eye on this issue with a detailed study.

Because we have to remember that in order to continue the economic development of Bangladesh, the issue of protecting the independence and sovereignty of the country must be given the highest priority and the necessary steps must be taken.

The writer is an assistant professor, Dept of Management, Sankuchail Degree College, Burichang, Cumilla

 

[Saif]

Dahal says land swap an option to resolve border issue

Prime minister hints at swapping disputed area to gain land link to Bangladesh via India.

kathmandupost.com

Dahal says land swap an option to resolve border issue​

Prime minister hints at swapping disputed area to gain land link to Bangladesh via India.

Anil Giri​

Published at : June 3, 2023
Updated at : June 3, 2023 10:36

Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal said on Friday that discussions have begun on alternatives for resolving the boundary issue with India, mainly the Kalapani dispute. After a meeting with his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi on Thursday, Dahal indicated that Nepal can consider swapping the Kalapani area with India in order to gain land access to Bangladesh through the Indian ‘chicken’s neck’.

The ‘chicken’s neck’ or Siliguri corridor is a strip of Indian land that borders Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and China. But India’s strategic circle views this strip as highly sensitive and important for India for geopolitical reasons, so it is not certain whether India will agree to such a land swap deal.

Talking to media persons in New Delhi on Friday morning, the prime minister revealed that he and Modi discussed ways to resolve boundary issues including the Kalapani dispute and possible land swap so that landlocked Nepal could get access to the sea.

During the joint press conference at Hyderabad House with Dahal, Modi had said, “We will keep working to take our relationship to Himalayan heights. And in this spirit, we will resolve all issues, be they boundary related or any other issues.”

Dahal, on the occasion, said, “Prime Minister Modiji and I discussed the boundary matter.”

“I urged Prime Minister Modiji to resolve the boundary matter through the established bilateral diplomatic mechanisms,” said Dahal.

This is the first time that the Indian side has expressed commitment to resolving the boundary dispute after Nepal and India entered a fresh dispute over Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura areas in 2020. After India in November 2019 unilaterally issued a new map by including the three areas claimed by Nepal within Indian borders and refused to entertain Nepali concerns, Nepal too, six months later in May 2020, issued its own map by including the three areas within its borders. The areas have been under Indian control for several decades.

The map incident took the bilateral relations to a new low.

“This time, the two countries have discussed border issues seriously. Kalapani has also been discussed in the Indian media and their general theme is that the issue should be resolved. When we sat with the Indian side, we discussed several options. One option is the India-Bangladesh model. Bangladesh and India had a problem for a long time, but they resolved it. One [solution] could be [applying] that model,” said Dahal.

India and Bangladesh had resolved their decades-old border issue through a land swap agreement in July 2015 through the exchange of enclaves, which continued in phases between the agreement date and June 2016. India amended its Constitution on May 25, 2015 to facilitate the agreement’s implementation.

After publishing the new map, the then KP Oli government had formed a nine-member panel in order to collect historical evidence including old maps and other cartographic proofs to support Nepal’s claim to Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura.

That evidence would be presented during bilateral boundary talks related to the Kalapani issue, according to officials.
CPN-UML Deputy General Secretary and former foreign minister Pradip Gyawali termed Dahal’s comments on the boundary dispute as ‘very immature.’

Gyawali helmed the foreign ministry when the boundary-related task force was formed. Gyawali said that a proposal [like land swap] is highly sensitive and needs intense discussions.

“First, there is no provision to allow land swap in our constitution. Second, land swap is the last option for us, because first we have to establish our claim over Kalapani. Third, that route [chicken’s neck] is important for India. And fourth, a person like the prime minister should not show his cards, when formal talks have not begun. The prime minister should not speak lightly on such a sensitive issue,” Gyawali said.

The task force had, besides land-swapping, suggested reclaiming the Nepali territory currently occupied by India by presenting historical evidence including maps. Another option it suggested was to lease out the Kalapani area to India for some years after India declared that Kalapani belongs to Nepal.

Also, another alternative was to build a special economic zone around Lipulekh where Nepal, India and China could undertake trilateral trade and business and Nepal would collect royalties and other fees, according to another member of the task force.

Former Director General of the Department of Survey Toya Nath Baral, who was also the member of the taskforce, said an alternative they had suggested was swapping land with India to permanently resolve the Kalapani dispute.

“But this is a very complicated issue,” said Baral, adding, “even if we get 400-500 square kilometers [from India] in western Nepal near Mahendranagar, it will not serve our interest.”

“But if we get a strip of Indian land to reach Bangladesh through our eastern border point, it will be a great achievement for Nepal. This will give us direct access to Bangladesh. And that strip should be fully barricaded for our use,” said Baral.

Former Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, Nepali Congress leader Sujata Koirala, and noted cartographer Buddhi Narayan Shrestha, among others, have floated this idea in the past. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, following the opening of the Kakarbhitta-Phulbari-Banglabandha transit route in 1997, Bangladesh has permitted Nepal to use its port in Mongla. Bangladesh has also provided an additional rail transit corridor to Nepal via Rohanpur (Bangladesh)-Singhabad (India). But several hassles have emerged on this route with India imposing multiple restrictions citing security reasons given its sensitive location and direct links to Bhutan and China.

“Probably the prime minister was speaking what was on his mind, but we are aware that the boundary dispute was not discussed in depth with the Indian side during the delegation-level talks,” a Nepali official who was part of the delegation level talks on Thursday at Hyderabad House told the Post over the phone from New Delhi.

“The Indian side appeared positive on the resolution of boundary disputes, but no detailed discussions or options were discussed. Probably, the issue might have been discussed in depth during the one-on-one between the prime minister and Modi, but we are not aware of it,” the official said.

Some Nepali experts also suggested that Nepal should think about getting access to Bangladesh from Nepal’s eastern border if India does not want to cede Kalapani, said Dahal.

“We have been raising the issue of getting direct access to Bangladesh for a long time. This is our requirement and our desire too. If we can manage this, it could be a good solution. Some of our experts have offered suggestions along these lines, saying that if we get access [to Bangladesh] from] the eastern point, that would be beneficial to us. This could be one alternative, but there are other options too,” said Dahal.

“The good thing is, India has finally acknowledged the Kalapani dispute, which it had long been ignoring and refusing to discuss,” Dahal added.

But some Nepali experts said it is impossible to acquire the Indian ‘chicken’s neck’ for our use as it has huge strategic importance for India.

“This is an impossible proposal,” former Nepali ambassador to Denmark Vijaya Kant Karna said. “That strip is sensitive to India because it borders China, Bhutan, Myanmar and some parts of Tibet.”

“We won’t get the chicken’s neck. Maybe land swap would be possible around Susta and other places. More importantly, we have already endorsed the new map from Parliament, amended the constitution, and we haven’t started negotiations with India. The Parliament should give a mandate to the foreign secretary or some other Nepali authority to hold talks with India so that once the issue is settled, the constitution could be amended accordingly,” said Karna.

Since the map dispute of 2020, India has avoided boundary talks with Nepal despite the latter’s repeated requests.
Dahal said India agreeing to discuss the issue and options is itself a breakthrough.

“That is why Modiji spoke and made a statement that we should resolve it. Modiji thinks the dispute should be resolved. He also thinks that if the dispute continues, Nepal-India relations would not improve. Our bilateral relations will move nowhere if we remain stuck over only Kalapani and Lipu Lekh—this was the impression I got after talking to Modiji,” said Dahal.

 

[Saif]

This Indian gentleman talks about annexing some Bangladeshi land to widen chicken neck. His audacity knows no bound.

 

[Saif]

শিলিগুড়ি করিডোর: পূর্ব এশিয়ার সেতু । গুরুত্ব পাচ্ছে বাংলাদেশ |

 

[Deleted due to Error (Muji Iqbal)]

Yes, the Siliguri Corridor is a huge weakness for India in the North East.

 

[Bilal9]

This Indian gentleman talks about annexing some Bangladeshi land to widen chicken neck. His audacity knows no bound.

Bewqoofs are not a rarity in some Indian quarters.

I blame Godi media propaganda for this, they never respect their neighbors and everything is Dadagiri North Indian cow belt style.

They bring this mentality even to foreign relations.

But this idiot is just posting this kind of incendiary post just to get clicks.

 

[Bilal9]

What if China wrings India’s ‘Chicken’s Neck’ – the Siliguri corridor? Here are some countermeasures

The Siliguri corridor, a narrow passage to India’s eight north-eastern (NE) states, is a perennial threat to our security. Strategically, it is the Achilles heel in the defence of almost 2,000 km of borders in...

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

What if China wrings India’s ‘Chicken’s Neck’ – the Siliguri corridor? Here are some countermeasures
October 9, 2019, 7:50 PM IST Mohinder Pal Singh in TOI Edit Page, Edit Page, India, World, TOI

The Siliguri corridor, a narrow passage to India’s eight north-eastern (NE) states, is a perennial threat to our security. Strategically, it is the Achilles heel in the defence of almost 2,000 km of borders in the NE states with China and Myanmar. This piece of land is about 60 km in length but a meagre 22 km in width at its narrowest point. With plain terrain not interspersed with any natural or man made obstacles, this patch makes defence a real challenge.

Undoubtedly, this 2,000 sq km stretch of land will be the prime and early target of the enemy during any confrontation. Naturally, the road corridor passing through this narrow corridor becomes a vital piece of ground which must be defended at all costs.

In 2003, India and China came to an agreement whereby China agreed to Sikkim’s addition to India and gave up all claims to the state and India recognised China’s sovereignty over Tibet. Whilst this significantly reduced the escalation in the India-Bhutan-China tri-junction region, China’s attempts to seize de facto control over the region continued. It culminated in the Doklam standoff between India and China during June-August 2017.

The threat to the Siliguri corridor (also known as Chicken’s Neck) is perennial as China has continued its overt road and airstrip construction activities on its side of the border. This could allow China to rapidly mobilise and deploy troops thereby threatening the Siliguri corridor. Furthermore, the deployment of artillery, missiles or anti-aircraft weaponry could easily jeopardise India’s efforts to resupply the region in time of war, especially considering that there is only a single railway line through the region to NE states.

Widening and strengthening this corridor is imperative. The first option for India is to enter into a treaty with Bangladesh permitting not only transit of military equipment during times of conflict but also civilian traffic and trade activities. This would add a layer of strategic depth in the region and alleviate (in some measure) concerns of the possible severance of the north-east with the mainland.

The treaty can cover multi-modal transport including road and rail and a smooth movement of freight and personnel. With the revival of Bimstec India’s relations with Bangladesh have seen a fillip, with seven pacts on important mutual issues signed during Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s recent four-day visit. India and Bangladesh have already mooted a proposal to facilitate transit with India’s landlocked north-east and PMs of both countries have issued joint statements in this regard in 2010 and 2016.

Currently, there is a joint working group which is examining the possibility of connecting Mahendraganj in Meghalaya to Hili in Bengal through Goraghat, Palashbari and Gaibandha in Bangladesh. This distance of about 100 km could easily be developed into an elevated road and rail corridor through Bangladesh. Such a corridor, if built in PPP mode can result in regular tariff to Bangladesh and provide a shot in the arm to trade and tourism in NE states.

The second option is to strengthen connectivity to the tri-junction area at Doka La so that our response as well as surveillance capability is augmented. Towards this, recent reports of converting the erstwhile mule track to Doka La into a black-top road by the Border Road Organisation and reducing the travel time from 7 hours to 40 minutes is a step in the right direction.

The third option is to make alternate transport arrangements which are safe and secure within the country itself. The development of a multi-modal transport corridor through Siliguri itself can be undertaken by India. As part of this initiative we can even build underground road tunnels which are less likely to be susceptible to air and artillery attack in a time of a military conflict.

Underground tunnelling through this vulnerable stretch, although costly, can give India a little more room to take harder militarily options, if required. Underground expressways and high speed rail connectivity through this corridor will also help to scale up the movement of civil and military traffic. This would also enhance trade and tourism of the NE region manifold during peacetime.

With some of these measures India can look to overcome the constraints imposed by geography and improve its position with regard to China.​

Gomar faansh hoye gesey. He said it out loud - what we knew all along. A gaya geo-strategist.

On one side of Indian mouth we hear "Kangladeshi" and "Ghoospetiya".

And now we become so important....

Giving India access over our sovereign land is non-negotiable.

We cannot afford angering China. Period. Our whole economic future depends on this.

Some Bangladeshi go-murkho "journalists" think this is negotiable, it is NOT.

 

[Nibba]

Gomar faansh hoye gesey. He said it out loud - what we knew all along. A gaya geo-strategist.

On one side of Indian mouth we hear "Kangladeshi" and "Ghoospetiya".

And now we become so important....

Giving India access over our sovereign land is non-negotiable.

We cannot afford angering China. Period. Our whole economic future depends on this.

Some Bangladeshi go-murkho "journalists" think this is negotiable, it is NOT.

Your whole economic future depends on the $22 billion trade deficit you run with china?

 

[Bilal9]

Your whole economic future depends on the $22 billion trade deficit you run with china?

I have edited your post minus the troll-bait comment you made.

Before you comment on a matter, like you did here - it is important to educate yourself.

And have the right attitude to learn from people more aware of the subject, otherwise you are wasting your time.

If you don't have the frame of mind to learn - why post at all?

$22 Billion trade deficit with China is not the point (which is mostly capital equipment and raw material for re-export).
The amount of existing (and expected) Chinese industrial value-addition investments in Bangladesh is huge (far greater than the annual $24 Billion we import from China) compared to what Indians will ever want to invest in Bangladesh. China is in a different league compared to India.

The Chinese are our development partners with most mega projects (bridges, power stations, roadways, railways) going to Chinese State-controlled concerns and Chinese banks financing them. The quality of these projects is high, far higher than equivalent projects attempted in India. Go to the Bangladesh infrastructure threads and take a gander sometime.

Indians do not have the capability to participate in these mega projects evidenced by the fact that they have never tried.

For consolation purposes, Hasina had to award a few small ones to Indian companies and the sub-par qualities of these smaller projects (and associated delays) is evidence that Indians need far more experience in this area.

So us preferring the Chinese to be our development partner (instead of India) is logical. India in the same situation would do the same.

 

[Egyptian]

Your whole economic future depends on the $22 billion trade deficit you run with china?

Are you from India, Bangladesh or Pakistan?

 

[Old School]

The so called Chicken Neck is a myth which is widely promoted by online BD bloggers with no military expertise or undereducated junior BD military officers. This so called Chicken neck has no military significance at the strategic, tactical and operational level in the 21st century military doctrine . It is a full waste of time to even discuss this with civilians. It could be an issue probably some five hundred years ago but not in modern time.

 

[Nibba]

I have edited your post minus the troll-bait comment you made.

Before you comment on a matter, like you did here - it is important to educate yourself.

And have the right attitude to learn from people more aware of the subject, otherwise you are wasting your time.

If you don't have the frame of mind to learn - why post at all?

$22 Billion trade deficit with China is not the point (which is mostly capital equipment and raw material for re-export).
The amount of existing (and expected) Chinese industrial value-addition investments in Bangladesh is huge (far greater than the annual $24 Billion we import from China) compared to what Indians will ever want to invest in Bangladesh. China is in a different league compared to India.

The Chinese are our development partners with most mega projects (bridges, power stations, roadways, railways) going to Chinese State-controlled concerns and Chinese banks financing them. The quality of these projects is high, far higher than equivalent projects attempted in India. Go to the Bangladesh infrastructure threads and take a gander sometime.

Indians do not have the capability to participate in these mega projects evidenced by the fact that they have never tried.

For consolation purposes, Hasina had to award a few small ones to Indian companies and the sub-par qualities of these smaller projects (and associated delays) is evidence that Indians need far more experience in this area.

So us preferring the Chinese to be our development partner (instead of India) is logical. India in the same situation would do the same.

All these words a few days after Hasina went to china and was sent back a day early with a 100 million dollars LMAO

Get used to it. It’s not 2010. They’ve really pulled back on their external investments everywhere. It hasn’t panned out for the most part. BRI is largely loss making.

India isn’t looking to replace china. We don’t invest in loss making dogshit infrastructure lol.

We will build that connectivity however. and you will do nothing about it.

 

[Bilal9]

We don’t invest in loss making dogshit infrastructure lol.

It's OK buddy, no one is asking you to. It's clear you are trolling.

I will temporarily lock this thread as we've made our points.

 

[Saif]

The so called Chicken Neck is a myth which is widely promoted by online BD bloggers with no military expertise or undereducated junior BD military officers. This so called Chicken neck has no military significance at the strategic, tactical and operational level in the 21st century military doctrine . It is a full waste of time to even discuss this with civilians. It could be an issue probably some five hundred years ago but not in modern time.

Unfortunately the Indians don't share your views on the Chicken Neck issue. India considers the Chicken Neck as its only strategic disadvantage which could lead to its disintegration under Chinese pressure. That's why the Indians want to use Bangladesh as an alternative route to Chicken's Neck. The opposition political parties in Bangladesh have also expressed their concerns about granting rail transit to India. The Chicken's Neck has military significance at the strategic, tactical, and operational level. That's why the Indian army has stationed its XXXIII Corps at Siliguri of West Bengal. The XXXIII Corps comprises of three Mountain Divisions namely 17 Mountain Division, 20 Mountain Division, and 27 Mountain Division.

New rail lines for Northeast via Bangladesh to bypass 'Chicken's Neck' | Kolkata News - Times of India

India plans to develop an alternative railway network through Bangladesh, leveraging the India-Bangladesh Trade Agreement of 1980. The initiative aims

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

After 55 years, India will inaugurate a new railway line with Bangladesh to save its ‘Chicken’s Neck’ from China | Business Insider India

India is saving its ‘Chicken’s Neck’ from China as it inaugurates a new railway line with Bangladesh after 55 years.

www.businessinsider.in

Bangladesh must not give India train transit

During Sheikh Hasinas recent Delhi visit, a significant development took place that might throw Bangladeshs

www.themirrorasia.net

 

[Mustafa.Iq]

If a war breaks out between China and India. The Siliguri Corridor is a huge weakness.

China can cut off Eastern India from the rest of India.

 

[Saif]

If a war breaks out between China and India. The Siliguri Corridor is a huge weakness.

China can cut off Eastern India from the rest of India.

You are quite right in your observation, brother

 

[Vikings]

If a war breaks out between China and India. The Siliguri Corridor is a huge weakness.

China can cut off Eastern India from the rest of India.

Does China have direct access to the corridor?

 

[Bilal9]

Does China have direct access to the corridor?

They have border access to Sikkim, which (once breached) is less than 170 KM from the entire Siliguri Corridor.

It's only a question of time before they decide to breach it, a low-hanging fruit strategically (so to speak)..

Here are the images showing the distances involved in KM.

Map with Sikkim not shown as a state, it is in between Bhutan and Nepal and bordering China (Tibet) in the North.

 

[Saif]

Does China have direct access to the corridor?

The Chinese army will make a huge thrust into tiny Sikkim to access Siliguri Corridor to separate North-East from the rest of India. Siliguri Corridor is the only strategic vulnerability of India which could bring about its disintegration. Hope that answers your question.

 

[Saif]

Let's see what Pinaki Bhattacharya has to say about Siliguri Corridor.

 

[Vikings]

They have border access to Sikkim, which (once breached) is less than 170 KM from the entire Siliguri Corridor.

It's only a question of time before they decide to breach it, a low-hanging fruit strategically (so to speak)..

Here are the images showing the distances involved in KM.

View attachment 7137

View attachment 7138

Map with Sikkim not shown as a state, it is in between Bhutan and Nepal and bordering China (Tibet) in the North.
View attachment 7139

The Chinese army will make a huge thrust into tiny Sikkim to access Siliguri Corridor to separate North-East from the rest of India. Siliguri Corridor is the only strategic vulnerability of India which could bring about its disintegration. Hope that answers your question.

Thanks both of you brothers! But I would like to know the take of @Old School bhai , so that others can learn more ( actually learn the reality) !

 

[Old School]

Thanks both of you brothers! But I would like to know the take of @Old School bhai , so that others can learn more!

Thank you for making me a teacher ! lol. I will not reply until I see someone with some Pakistani/ Chinese/ Indian government work background is participating in these sort of threads.

 

[Vikings]

Thank you for making me a teacher ! lol. I will not reply until I see someone with some Pakistani/ Chinese/ Indian government work background is participating in these sort of threads.

@Old School bhai , of course you are a good teacher ( but for passionate students , who like to learn . People who always love arguments, can never learn anything from you, I know it too!) and I know it very well ; although I'm a very common civilian , but I sometimes can use my tiny brian ( partially though, not fully because I'm amateur in this case) , and most of time don't see the world and it's politics and regional politics as black and white.

So I honor your decision not to comment unless officials participating in such discussion.

I understand that learning surgery isn't possible without practical experience , and performing surgery requires lots of professional skills and dedication.

Military strategy is like the same , or perhaps more rigorous; other than professional experience it's very much understandable for me that others will have hard time understanding, or maybe even won't understand at all!

Other than professionals most people ( users ) not only can't wrap their head on such thing, but also will end up baiting flame because of their almost zero experience.

But all people should realise that the world isn't black and white as they love to think.


If common people can understand surgery or Military strategy , then why do we need surgeons to perform surgery and need Military strategist to make plans?

So yes again I honor your decision not to discuss on this matter on a public forum , unless professional Military strategists join and engage in such discussions.

Thanks again for your straightforwardness ! Best regards.

 

[Saif]

Nepal wants chicken neck to connect to Bangladesh. They call it land swapping. India rejects.

 

[Bilal9]

Nepal wants chicken neck to connect to Bangladesh. They call it land swapping. India rejects.

There was no doubt that India would ever agree though....Nepal's predicament is that although they are coreligionist Hindus just like majority of Indians and although Nepalese have free visaless travel and working rights in India, Indians have just as much suspicion for Nepalese foreign policy, as they do for that of Bangladeshis. Plenty of trust deficit.

 

[Saif]

There was no doubt that India would ever agree though....Nepal's predicament is that although they are coreligionist Hindus just like majority of Indians and although Nepalese have free visaless travel and working rights in India, Indians have just as much suspicion for Nepalese foreign policy, as they do for that of Bangladeshis. Plenty of trust deficit.

India would never let Nepal grow as it has good relation with China. We want Nepal to use our sea ports but for that to happen Nepal needs to get transit right from India which is not going to happen anytime soon.

 

[Bilal9]

India would never let Nepal grow as it has good relation with China. We want Nepal to use our sea ports but for that to happen Nepal needs to get transit right from India which is not going to happen anytime soon.

Once Hasina is gone, then we will have opportunity to reshape the relationship with India and use leverage to get what we want from India. For those who doubt it, there is plenty of leverage, we just have to use it tactfully.

If Didi wants to stand in the way - she will need to reconsider.

 

[PakistanProud]

Once Hasina is gone, then we will have opportunity to reshape the relationship with India and use leverage to get what we want from India. For those who doubt it, there is plenty of leverage, we just have to use it tactfully.

If Didi wants to stand in the way - she will need to reconsider.

Will Hasina ever truly be gone, @Old School are you optimistic that she won’t leave nepotism behind?

 

[Bilal9]

Will Hasina ever truly be gone, @Old School are you optimistic that she won’t leave nepotism behind?

With passing time (this uninformed gareeb banda's opinion is) it is becoming increasingly clear that Hasina is not out of the woods as far as losing her gaddi.

Every day - I get credible reports multiple times a day (as understandable) from sources both personal and media (some approved by @Old School bhai such as Netra news) - that people are not backing down from their demand that she step down. The fire may be temporarily out, but the embers are still very much burning.

People want her gone, period.

She recently added grease to the fire by banning Jamaat and its student wing political activities.

More importantly, it is also increasingly clear (and evident) that the US (Peter Haas who is US Ambassador and Don Lou who is US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs et al) may also want her to step down though they have not made it public yet. This is my information through my own sources.

But the final word I leave to the words of @Old School bhai who is much better informed, he may correct me if needed.

 

[Old School]

Will Hasina ever truly be gone, @Old School are you optimistic that she won’t leave nepotism behind?

Nepotism is unfortunately an integrated part of the entire South Asian culture. It will remain so until the end of the world.
The history since 1972 - today for Bangladesh as a separate state tells a different story, and I have closely studied each year since 1972 - today more than any human being you can ever meet, let alone in this forum.
When Hasina's father, Sheikh Mujib, was killed during a late-night coup on 15 August 1975, India did nothing despite having a 25-year defense treaty. Indian ambassador to Dacca was even in close communication with the new regime, who promised them that Bangladesh would not do anything against India. Instead, India banned any news about this killing in India under extraordinary emergency power by Indira Gandhi. I personally know the people who killed her father Sheikh Mujib. However, all subsequent Bangladeshi rulers have been more or less India-compliant.
The state of Bangladesh has been an Indian project since its birth, whether Bengalis like to hear it or not. India is their biggest neighbor from three sides of their border with the Bay of Bengal in the south. Anyone who comes after Hasina will be no different unless Bangladesh changes its name. lol

 

[Bilal9]

Nepotism is unfortunately an integrated part of the entire South Asian culture. It will remain so until the end of the world.
The history since 1972 - today for Bangladesh as a separate state tells a different story, and I have closely studied each year since 1972 - today more than any human being you can ever meet, let alone in this forum.
When Hasina's father, Sheikh Mujib, was killed during a late-night coup on 15 August 1975, India did nothing despite having a 25-year defense treaty. Indian ambassador to Dacca was even in close communication with the new regime, who promised them that Bangladesh would not do anything against India. Instead, India banned any news about this killing in India under extraordinary emergency power by Indira Gandhi. I personally know the people who killed her father Sheikh Mujib. However, all subsequent Bangladeshi rulers have been more or less India-compliant.
The state of Bangladesh has been an Indian project since its birth, whether Bengalis like to hear it or not. India is their biggest neighbor from three sides of their border with the Bay of Bengal in the south. Anyone who comes after Hasina will be no different unless Bangladesh changes its name. lol

Well I have to agree with you reluctantly.

Bangladesh' climb up the ladder cannot be gained by opposing or ignoring India.

But actively engaging and negotiating things diplomatically with India as opposed to unconditional one-way subjugation by India (as practiced by the incumbent administration) are two different things. One can say confidently that Hasina has sold us down the river to India. In spite of the fact that the Indians did nothing to save her Dad's hide.

There are few examples where one larger nation like India controls another nation's infrastructure (Mongla port in Bangladesh). This is not a sustainable scenario, no one in Bangladesh will accept this except the few Awami League folks under Hasina.

Hasina will lose her ability to govern based on this one fact alone. Just my two cents.

 

[Saif]

Nepotism is unfortunately an integrated part of the entire South Asian culture. It will remain so until the end of the world.
The history since 1972 - today for Bangladesh as a separate state tells a different story, and I have closely studied each year since 1972 - today more than any human being you can ever meet, let alone in this forum.
When Hasina's father, Sheikh Mujib, was killed during a late-night coup on 15 August 1975, India did nothing despite having a 25-year defense treaty. Indian ambassador to Dacca was even in close communication with the new regime, who promised them that Bangladesh would not do anything against India. Instead, India banned any news about this killing in India under extraordinary emergency power by Indira Gandhi. I personally know the people who killed her father Sheikh Mujib. However, all subsequent Bangladeshi rulers have been more or less India-compliant.
The state of Bangladesh has been an Indian project since its birth, whether Bengalis like to hear it or not. India is their biggest neighbor from three sides of their border with the Bay of Bengal in the south. Anyone who comes after Hasina will be no different unless Bangladesh changes its name. lol

As per the seven point agreement with India, Bangladesh lost the right to raise a standing army for her security. But the subsequent Bangladeshi Governments refused to abide by this condition and raised a standing army. Another harmful condition was that Bangladesh would consult with India in conducting her foreign affairs. But the subsequent Bangladeshi Governments refused to abide by this condition too and forged a deep economic and defense cooperation with China which India considers an enemy country. So, all I am trying to say is that not all Bangladeshi Governments were India compliant. Only Awami League Government is India compliant.

 

[Bilal9]

As per the seven point agreement with India, Bangladesh lost the right to raise a standing army for her security. But the subsequent Bangladeshi Governments refused to abide by this condition and raised a standing army. Another harmful condition was that Bangladesh would consult with India in conducting her foreign affairs. But the subsequent Bangladeshi Governments refused to abide by this condition too and forged a deep economic and defense cooperation with China which India considers an enemy country. So, all I am trying to say is that not all Bangladeshi Governments were India compliant. Only Awami League Government is India compliant.

Good points @Saif bhai.

 

[Saif]

Time to solve India's Chicken Neck Corridor Problem.

(This video examines the possibility of annexing a portion of Bangladesh's Northern border to expand India's chicken neck. I hope this is not the official policy of India because the whole idea of annexing a portion of Bangladesh by India to expand its chicken neck is very dangerous for our territorial integrity.)

 

[Saif]

যেভাবে হাতছাড়া হতে পারে ভারতের পূর্বাঞ্চলীয় ৭টি রাজ্য

 

[Saif]

‘চিকেন নেক’ কেন এত গুরুত্বপূর্ণ হয়ে উঠলো?

 

[Saif]

চিকেনস নেক নিয়ে কেন বিপদে ইন্ডিয়া?

 

[Saif]

৭ সিস্টার্স দখল করবে চীন ও বাংলাদেশ? দুশ্চিন্তায় ভারত ।

 

[Saif]

মুরগির গলার আদলে চিকেনস নেক নিয়ে বাংলাদেশ প্রসঙ্গে ভারতের ঘুম হারাম

 

[Bilal9]

‘চিকেন নেক’ কেন এত গুরুত্বপূর্ণ হয়ে উঠলো?

I think the Indian Godi Media, as usual - are blowing things out of proportion.

It's a talking point for Hindutva in the theme of "Desh Bachao" (save the motherland) and will garner votes for sure.

Who is going to breach Indian territory anyway?

 

[Saif]

Who is going to breach Indian territory anyway?

China with the help of Bangladesh.

India has stationed 2-3 mountain divisions in and around chicken neck. It proves that India seriously thinks that the chicken neck is strategically vulnerable and needs to be protected by all means.

 

[Saif]

The retired colonel warns India that if Bangladesh plays politics with Chicken's neck, the seven sisters of India will face dire consequence. I think the defense planners of Bangladesh should formulate a policy to gain maximum strategic advantage from India's Chicken's neck.

 

[Vsdoc]

Sigh ...

 

[Saif]

India fortifies 'Chicken's Neck' as Bangladesh, China eye strategic corridor

Bangladesh's overtures to China for potential investments have raised concerns in India about the security of the strategically vital Siliguri Corridor, commonly known as the 'Chicken's Neck.'

www.indiatoday.in

STRENGTHENING THE CHICKEN'S NECK

The Indian Army has described the Siliguri Corridor as its strongest defence line, countering any potential threats through advanced military preparedness. The Trishakti Corps, headquartered at Sukna near the corridor, plays a key role in securing the region. This corps is equipped with state-of-the-art weaponry, including Rafale fighter jets, BrahMos missiles, and advanced air defence systems.

Recent statements by the Indian Army Chief have reinforced India's stance on the corridor's security. He emphasised that rather than being a vulnerability, the 'Chicken's Neck' is India's strongest military region, where forces from West Bengal, Sikkim, and the Northeast can be mobilised swiftly in case of any threat.

MULTI-LAYERED SECURITY MEASURES
The Indian Armed Forces have taken extensive steps to enhance security in the region:
​

• Deployment of advanced military assets: The Indian Air Force has stationed a squadron of Rafale fighter jets at Hashimara Airbase, alongside MiG aircraft.​
• BrahMos missile regiment: A regiment of BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles has been deployed in the corridor to deter potential threats.​
• Surface-to-air missile systems: India has stationed the S-400 missile system in the region to prevent any aerial incursions.​
• MRSAM and Akash air defence systems: These provide an additional layer of security, ensuring airspace protection against any infiltration.​
• Regular military drills: The Trishakti Corps frequently conducts combat exercises, including live-fire drills with T-90 tanks, to enhance operational readiness.​

STRATEGIC CAUTION

India remains vigilant against evolving regional threats. The recent remarks by Bangladesh's interim Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus, along with China's increasing presence in Bangladesh through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), are being closely assessed. Security experts believe that Dhaka’s growing alignment with Beijing could pose strategic challenges for India, particularly concerning the security of the Siliguri Corridor.

In response, India has bolstered its defence posture in the region. Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan recently visited North Bengal to review operational readiness, emphasising India's commitment to safeguarding its territorial integrity. The visit included inspections of forward bases and high-level discussions on security strategies.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, FUTURE READINESS
The importance of securing the 'Chicken's Neck' became evident during the 2017 Doklam standoff when Indian forces successfully countered Chinese attempts to construct a road in Bhutanese territory, which could have compromised the Siliguri Corridor. Learning from past encounters, India continues to enhance its defence infrastructure and preparedness.

With advanced weaponry, strategic deployments, and continuous vigilance, India has fortified the 'Chicken's Neck' against any external threats. As regional dynamics shift, India remains committed to ensuring the security and stability of this vital corridor, reinforcing its position as a formidable force in South Asia.​

 

[Saif]

The Indian government has taken comprehensive measures to protect its chicken neck from a possible joint military attack by Bangladesh and China. Though Bangladesh has denied any such military plan to attack India's chicken neck, India is convinced that Bangla-China joint military action is in the offing.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

Why does India need Bangladesh to maintain her territorial integrity in North-East?

This is in case where India decides not to use BD territory unless BD permits. In case of emergency, India can just inform BD and move its force through. In even worst case scenario, the option of attaching morthen BD and merging it with India open. A big population of BD wants to merge with India. It should not be a big task for India. Assign the task to R&AW. It will happen in some time.