New Tweets

[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh

G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh
226
5K
More threads by Saif


India’s river linking project puts Sunderbans in peril
Mostofa Sarwar 14 November, 2024, 23:10

1731633427369.png

New Age

Unlike Steinbeck’s defamed ‘salt-water-eating bushes’ of the Sea of Cortez, the Sunderbans is an excellent forest treasure for Bangladesh, India’s West Bengal, and the rest of the world. In 1997, UNESCO awarded the Sunderbans the accolade ‘A World Heritage Site,’ with the obvious implication that everything should be done to preserve this incredible wonder of nature, the world’s largest continuous mangrove stand. A decade ago, the part of the Sunderbans that belongs to West Bengal earned the same honour. The Sunderbans is a fascinating interface where the ocean and continent intermingle. If implemented, India’s National River Linking Project will perhaps annihilate this unique treasure with its diverse plant and animal species, including mangroves and Royal Bengal Tigers.

The Sunderbans, named after its dominant mangrove, Sundari is one of the first government-managed mangrove forests in the world. It is located at the lower Ganges delta. This is the largest delta in the world, formed by the outpouring of sediments over many million years by the Ganges, the Brahmaputra, and the Meghna Rivers. The delta building continues to have the world’s largest sediment load, almost one billion tonnes annually. The Sunderbans occupies 10,277 square kilometres of land and water. The eastern 60 per cent is in Bangladesh, and the rest is in the West Bengal Province of India. Approximately one-third of this magnificent forest has distributaries, brackish marshes, and tidal estuaries. The Sunderbans is a protective barrier against coastal erosion, cyclonic storms, and tidal surges. It produces incredible amounts of food, building materials, and fuel for the surrounding communities. Many species of mammals, reptiles, birds, fishes, etc, inhabit this majestic forest. This forest is the largest remaining habitat of the celebrated Royal Bengal Tiger, which is now an endangered species.

The Sunderbans can be divided, based on salinity and plant ecology, into three zones, with overall dominance of the Sundari in the freshwater zone in the northeastern part, Gewa in the mild saltwater zone in the middle, and Goran in the saltwater zone near the coastline. All three prominent mangroves and another species, Nipa Palm, locally known as Golpata, grow throughout the forest, but their concentration and height depend on salinity. The Sunderbans has a wide variety of biota supported by a complex and dynamic eco-environment, the main sustenance of this system being the flow of freshwater by the distributaries of the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Rivers.

Imagine a world 70 million years ago, when the Indian tectonic plate was almost at the end of its arduous odyssey from the supercontinent, Pangea. Formidable dinosaurs were about to become extinct, and tigers, including other carnivores, began evolving from animals called miacids. After a long evolution, modern-day tigers have evolved in Asia, and early tiger fossils dating 500 thousand years BP have been found in China and Siberia. Almost 65 million years ago, mangroves appeared in the Indo-Malayan realm. Mangroves (dispersing through the ocean water) and tigers (roaming through the primordial land) took many million years to come to their present being in the Sunderbans. Human intervention in the form of India’s National River Linking Project threatens to undo this incredible crafting of evolution and destroy this superb ecosystem. Would it not also be a travesty against human dignity and a despicable act of infinite proportion?

The Sunderbans has undergone significant changes during the last 500 years because the Ganges changed its course three times. Before the 16th century, the trunk stream of the Ganges was the Bhagirathi and the Hooghly, the Bhairab being the main delta-building spill river. In the 16th century, joining the Brahmaputra, the Ganges changed its principal channel to the Madaripur Course (Arial Khan River). From 1830s to 1840s, the last course change took place. The Padma (combined Ganges-Brahmaputra) and Meghna joined to form the present trunk stream, Meghna, the main delta-building river. Meandering and changing course by a river are common in flat topography. However, this eastward shifting of the Ganges is due to the uplifting of the western Sunderbans relative to the global sea level. What is the cause of this uplifting? This is a natural process far beyond the domain of human intervention, and the leading cause is the isostatic imbalance of the Himalayan mountains and the Indian tectonic plate. This shifting has been responsible for the silting of rivers in the western Sunderbans and an increase in freshwater flow down the rivers in the Bangladesh part of the Sunderbans. Remember, this has been a natural process, not a man-made one. Nevertheless, this is a suitable model to assess the impact of freshwater flow on the Sunderbans’ plant ecology.

The Farakka Barrage across the Ganges, located roughly 18 kilometres from the Bangladesh border, became operational in 1975. Diverting the water flow to the Bhagirathi-Hooghly distributaries of West Bengal, India, has reduced the freshwater flow in the lower reaches of the Ganges through Bangladesh. This has led to the salinity intrusion a few hundred kilometres upstream during the dry season, changing the salinity regime of the Sunderbans. The immediate casualty is the Sundari mangrove trees of the Sunderbans. It is reported with depressing anguish from several places of less saline northeastern Sunderbans, where Sundari achieves its maximum height, that this majestic tree is dying with the blight, starting at its top. In several places, with the worsening freshwater flow to the forest due to India’s diversion at Farakka Barrage, the golpata and other plant species are also being affected. The monsoon flood overflow cannot stop this pitiful decay of Sundari and other plants because the damage inflicted during the dry season is irreversible. Sundari’s progressive rot directly correlates to the eco-environmental change of the Sunderbans due to India’s water withdrawal at the Farakka point. Similar effects have been experienced in other countries like Pakistan and Vietnam. This damage is not stopping at Sundari but will ultimately extend its deadly tentacles to this forest’s entire biota.

Now, one can see the immensity of the impending doom if India’s National River Linking Project, envisioned by former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 2002, is executed. This project will divert vast amounts of water from the rivers of Bangladesh. The already existing problems of the Sunderbans caused by Farakka Barrage will increase many-fold. The killer bite to Bangladesh’s agriculture, forestry, fishery, public health, livelihood, environment, and wildlife by this National River Linking project would be many magnitudes higher than that of the Farakka Barrage. According to this stupendous plan (with a price tag of more than $168 billion), India would dig 30 links connecting major rivers, including the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and the southern rivers of the Deccan Peninsula, and divert about 200 billion cubic meters of water per year for irrigating the arid western states and semi-arid southern states. This project involves diverting one-third of the water from the Ganges and Brahmaputra — all at a colossal cost to Bangladesh. The Indian province of West Bengal will not be spared as a collateral victim.

If the world community does not stop this naive and dangerous Indian plan, the enchanting Sundari-mangrove, the awesome Royal Bengal Tiger, and other beautiful species — nature’s incredible craftsmanship through many million years — will be lost in oblivion.

Dr Mostofa Sarwar, a scientist and poet, is a professor emeritus at the University of New Orleans. He was dean, provost, and vice-chancellor of Delgado Community College and served as a visiting professor and adjunct faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania.​
 

Hold another long march to intensify demand for right to river water: Dr. Moyeen Khan
UNB
Published :
Dec 05, 2024 20:19
Updated :
Dec 05, 2024 20:19

1733450089005.png


BNP Standing Committee member Dr. Abdul Moyeen Khan has proposed organising another long march to create public awareness about protecting the people of Bangladesh from the environmental disaster caused by lack of access to river water.

He made the suggestion while addressing a memorial meeting organised to mark the first death anniversary of former International Farakka Committee Chairman Atiqur Rahman Salu on Thursday.

Speaking as chief guest, Dr. Moyeen said, “There are 54 common rivers to which we do not have due rights. If we cannot remedy this, a disaster will occur—disrupting the livelihood of one-third of the population.”

He emphasised that a solution must be sought not only by Bangladesh but also by the 1.5 billion people in neighboring India, highlighting the friendship between the people of the two countries, which was proven during the Liberation War.

The meeting, chaired by International Farakka Committee Chairman Syed Tipu Sultan and moderated by Coordinator Mostafa Kamal Majumdar, was also addressed by Jatiya Party (Jafar) Chairman Mostafa Jamal Haider, International Farakka Committee Bangladesh President Professor Jasim Uddin Ahmad, Revolutionary Workers Party General Secretary Saiful Haque, BNP leader and former MP Zahiruddin Swapan, International Farakka Committee Bangladesh Vice President Dr. Nazma Ahmed, prominent businessman FK Md. Emdad Khan, and BFUJ General Secretary Quader Gani Chowdhury, among others.

At the beginning of the program, a report was presented on the life and works of Atiqur Rahman Salu, followed by a prayer for the salvation of his soul.

Dr. Moyeen Khan praised Salu for his historic contributions, saying, “Atiqur Rahman Salu created history, but did we honour him while he was alive?” He recalled Salu’s leadership in organizing the ‘Second Farakka Long March’ in Chilmari.

Dr. Moyeen described Salu as a patriot, noting his call for the establishment of a democratic Bangladesh and his participation in the Kagmari Conference.

He praised Salu for taking the initiative to prevent environmental harm and highlighted his efforts in advocating for the protection of river water.

Dr. Moyeen also said that the aspiration of the people of Bangladesh is to have free elections every five years.

He expressed concern that the new generation has not been able to experience this democratic right. “If given a choice between wealth and prosperity or freedom, the people will choose freedom first,” he said.

He emphasised the importance of unity, stating that it should be unity in diversity, not in the style of the BKSAL regime.

He said that, while the nation has crossed one step toward democracy by removing tyranny, the second step is free elections, which would lead to the formation of a democratic government.

He also mentioned that the responsibility of transitioning to democracy lies with the Interim Government, urging them to not fail in this duty. “We have three tools—politics, diplomacy, and information and communication technology—that we can use to establish democracy if we use them wisely,” he added.

Mostafa Jamal Haider recalled that Atiqur Rahman Salu was the first to speak of an independent democratic Bangladesh. He referenced a meeting held at Paltan Maidan on February 22, 1970, where Salu, along with leaders like Kazi Zafar, Dr. Mahbubullah, and Mostafa Jamal Haider, was sentenced under martial law for their speeches.

Haider also called for the current IFC leadership to build a strong movement for the right to river water, just as Salu had done.

Professor Jasim Uddin Ahmad highlighted Salu’s continuous efforts for the sovereignty and independence of Bangladesh until his death. He also discussed the environmental impact on the Sundarbans due to the withdrawal of Ganga water, urging national unity to present Bangladesh’s viewpoint in a strong manner on this issue.

Saiful Haque, General Secretary of the Revolutionary Workers Party, criticized the neglect of Bangladesh’s demand for river water over the past 15-16 years, while India’s demands have been consistently accepted. He lamented the concessions made to India, such as granting transit rights, while Bangladesh’s sovereignty and independence have been compromised. He also mentioned the ongoing border killings and how Bangladesh’s interests have been sacrificed to appease India.

Zahiruddin Swapan recalled his political journey alongside Atiqur Rahman Salu, expressing confidence that Salu’s struggle for river water rights would ultimately be successful.​
 

Hold another long march to intensify demand for right to river water: Dr. Moyeen Khan
UNB
Published :
Dec 05, 2024 20:19
Updated :
Dec 05, 2024 20:19

View attachment 11392

BNP Standing Committee member Dr. Abdul Moyeen Khan has proposed organising another long march to create public awareness about protecting the people of Bangladesh from the environmental disaster caused by lack of access to river water.

He made the suggestion while addressing a memorial meeting organised to mark the first death anniversary of former International Farakka Committee Chairman Atiqur Rahman Salu on Thursday.

Speaking as chief guest, Dr. Moyeen said, “There are 54 common rivers to which we do not have due rights. If we cannot remedy this, a disaster will occur—disrupting the livelihood of one-third of the population.”

He emphasised that a solution must be sought not only by Bangladesh but also by the 1.5 billion people in neighboring India, highlighting the friendship between the people of the two countries, which was proven during the Liberation War.

The meeting, chaired by International Farakka Committee Chairman Syed Tipu Sultan and moderated by Coordinator Mostafa Kamal Majumdar, was also addressed by Jatiya Party (Jafar) Chairman Mostafa Jamal Haider, International Farakka Committee Bangladesh President Professor Jasim Uddin Ahmad, Revolutionary Workers Party General Secretary Saiful Haque, BNP leader and former MP Zahiruddin Swapan, International Farakka Committee Bangladesh Vice President Dr. Nazma Ahmed, prominent businessman FK Md. Emdad Khan, and BFUJ General Secretary Quader Gani Chowdhury, among others.

At the beginning of the program, a report was presented on the life and works of Atiqur Rahman Salu, followed by a prayer for the salvation of his soul.

Dr. Moyeen Khan praised Salu for his historic contributions, saying, “Atiqur Rahman Salu created history, but did we honour him while he was alive?” He recalled Salu’s leadership in organizing the ‘Second Farakka Long March’ in Chilmari.

Dr. Moyeen described Salu as a patriot, noting his call for the establishment of a democratic Bangladesh and his participation in the Kagmari Conference.

He praised Salu for taking the initiative to prevent environmental harm and highlighted his efforts in advocating for the protection of river water.

Dr. Moyeen also said that the aspiration of the people of Bangladesh is to have free elections every five years.

He expressed concern that the new generation has not been able to experience this democratic right. “If given a choice between wealth and prosperity or freedom, the people will choose freedom first,” he said.

He emphasised the importance of unity, stating that it should be unity in diversity, not in the style of the BKSAL regime.

He said that, while the nation has crossed one step toward democracy by removing tyranny, the second step is free elections, which would lead to the formation of a democratic government.

He also mentioned that the responsibility of transitioning to democracy lies with the Interim Government, urging them to not fail in this duty. “We have three tools—politics, diplomacy, and information and communication technology—that we can use to establish democracy if we use them wisely,” he added.

Mostafa Jamal Haider recalled that Atiqur Rahman Salu was the first to speak of an independent democratic Bangladesh. He referenced a meeting held at Paltan Maidan on February 22, 1970, where Salu, along with leaders like Kazi Zafar, Dr. Mahbubullah, and Mostafa Jamal Haider, was sentenced under martial law for their speeches.

Haider also called for the current IFC leadership to build a strong movement for the right to river water, just as Salu had done.

Professor Jasim Uddin Ahmad highlighted Salu’s continuous efforts for the sovereignty and independence of Bangladesh until his death. He also discussed the environmental impact on the Sundarbans due to the withdrawal of Ganga water, urging national unity to present Bangladesh’s viewpoint in a strong manner on this issue.

Saiful Haque, General Secretary of the Revolutionary Workers Party, criticized the neglect of Bangladesh’s demand for river water over the past 15-16 years, while India’s demands have been consistently accepted. He lamented the concessions made to India, such as granting transit rights, while Bangladesh’s sovereignty and independence have been compromised. He also mentioned the ongoing border killings and how Bangladesh’s interests have been sacrificed to appease India.

Zahiruddin Swapan recalled his political journey alongside Atiqur Rahman Salu, expressing confidence that Salu’s struggle for river water rights would ultimately be successful.​

What right does BD have on river water. Whatever India gives is out of pure goodwill. Now BD has taken the path of Provoking India. IF BD has any right, they can certainly go to international court to claim their right. There is nothing wrong in it.
 
What right does BD have on river water. Whatever India gives is out of pure goodwill. Now BD has taken the path of Provoking India. IF BD has any right, they can certainly go to international court to claim their right. There is nothing wrong in it.
Common rivers between Bangladesh and India are international rivers. Bangladesh has equal rights to the water of all international rivers. We should have gone to the International court but since India is not a signatory to international law, we refrained from going to the international court.
 
Last edited:
Most of Bangladesh will be under water soon. Then they will have all the water they need.

Machine gun nests and land mined borders with attack dogs will do the rest.

Boat people for posterity.

Maybe if they make it to Pakistan, they will have a home?

@Lulldapull @Dogun18 @Mainerik @Dalit1982 ???
A good chunk of India will also be under water due to climate change/greenhouse effect. 17% of our total land will be inundated by 2050 if we don't take precautionary measures like constructing dykes. As far as I know Bangladesh has made a delta plan to mitigate the effect of climate change/greenhouse effect.
 
A good chunk of India will also be under water due to climate change/greenhouse effect. 17% of our total land will be inundated by 2050 if we don't take precautionary measures like constructing dykes. As far as I know Bangladesh has made a delta plan to mitigate the effect of climate change/greenhouse effect.

Don't worry about India.

Start working on those boats with lungi windsails.
 

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle Create