[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment

Quick Reply ✓ Posted!
Quick Reply ✓ Posted!
[🇧🇩] Save the Rivers/Forests/Hills-----Save the Environment
656
26K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Bangladesh’s sinking delta faces $52b climate-funding gap


1792712352529.webp

Representational image

Bangladesh faces a growing climate-financing challenge as sinking delta land and rising sea levels threaten coastal communities, infrastructure and economic activity.

The country's Delta Plan 2100 requires an estimated US$52 billion in investment through 2040, but with 99 per cent of the expenditure expected to come from public resources, securing the necessary funding remains a formidable task.

The challenge is compounded by land subsidence, which can accelerate the relative rise in sea levels and worsen coastal flooding.

"Land subsidence is exceeding sea level rise in major river delta systems," says the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in its Asia-Pacific Climate Report 2026: Coastal Risks on the Rise -- Actions for a Resilient Future, released on Wednesday.

The Delta Plan 2100 envisages 80 projects, with estimated implementation costs of around $52 billion, including operation and maintenance, through 2040.

Financing the plan remains a major challenge, as the report estimates that 99 per cent of total expenditure will need to come from public resources.

Delta-related expenditure would need to reach 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) annually, according to the report.

Against existing adaptation spending of around 0.8 per cent of GDP a year, Bangladesh would require an additional 1.2 per cent of GDP in public finance and 0.5 per cent in private investment.

The funding requirement comes as the country faces mounting risks from coastal flooding, erosion and saltwater intrusion, which threaten settlements, infrastructure, livelihoods and economic activity.

The report estimates that around 17.45 million people in Bangladesh could be affected by coastal flooding by 2100 under a high-emissions scenario.

It identifies Bangladesh and Vietnam as countries facing both high absolute exposure and a high relative population burden from coastal flooding.

The risks extend beyond damage to homes and farmland. Flooding and salinity can disrupt transport, undermine agricultural production, threaten freshwater supplies and damage infrastructure, increasing pressure on public expenditure and the wider economy.

Land subsidence adds another layer of risk. The report says the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta has a mean subsidence rate of 4 millimetres a year, while the maximum rate in some locations reaches 55 millimetres a year.

Subsidence is driven by factors including groundwater extraction, sediment compaction and reduced sediment supply.

As a result, some areas can experience a faster rise in relative sea levels than projections based on ocean levels alone would suggest, intensifying the risks of flooding, erosion and saltwater intrusion.

The report's regional projections underline the potential economic cost of delaying adaptation. Across 30 coastal economies in Asia and the Pacific, annual coastal flood damage is estimated at around $27 billion today.

Without adequate adaptation, it could rise to between $172 billion and $199 billion by 2050, and between $520 billion and $739 billion by 2100.

The ADB estimates that annual investment of $9 billion to $19 billion in coastal protection across the economies covered could keep damage close to current levels and avert between $178 billion and $360 billion in losses each year.

These are regional estimates, not Bangladesh-specific costs, but they indicate the potential economic benefits of investing in coastal resilience before disasters cause further damage.

More than 400 million people in the ADB's developing member economies with coastlines live within 10 kilometres of the sea.

The region's coastal areas generate an estimated $7.0 trillion in economic output annually, making the protection of coastal settlements and infrastructure an economic as well as an environmental priority.

The report also highlights a gap in climate finance. International adaptation finance for coastal economies rose from around $5 billion in 2015 to an annual average of $11.4 billion in 2022-23, but financing needs remain substantial.

For Bangladesh, the challenge is to turn long-term planning into funded, coordinated and implementable investments while managing competing demands on public resources.

The Delta Plan's reliance on public funding makes the mobilisation of government resources and the effective prioritisation of projects particularly important.

The report calls for long-term, adaptive and risk-informed approaches to coastal protection that take account of differences in local geography and exposure.

Such approaches can help governments plan investments in advance and adjust them as risks change, rather than relying mainly on emergency responses after disasters.

For Bangladesh, where the delta supports a large population and significant economic activity, the task is not only to finance the proposed investment but also to ensure that resources are deployed effectively to reduce risks to people, infrastructure and the economy over the coming decades.​
 

Forests need more than paper promises

Encroachment in Patuakhali reserved forest exposes gap between pledges and the will to enforce them


1792714984717.webp

VISUAL: STAR

Why is it that our forests are so often treated as expendable? On one hand, we are quick to make gestures that look commendable on paper. But we are far less consistent in realising them on the ground. The latest report of such attrition of forestland comes from Patuakhali’s Rangabali, where an estimated 200 to 300 trees have been cut down in a reserved forest to make way for watermelon cultivation. Forest officials say an excavator is also being used to build an embankment on the site. The work has continued despite the Forest Department’s objections and its filing of two cases and a general diary with police. What is most troubling is that the encroachment may have been given an appearance of being legal.

Last October, the district administration reportedly leased at least 30 acres of reserved forest for two years. However, a Rangabali upazila land office document from last year, signed by a former UNO, appears to have permitted farming for only one season or a year. Those overseeing watermelon cultivation claim they leased it from the administration, while the current UNO denies any involvement. How could land in a reserved forest be leased at all, and why did the Forest Department’s objections fail to stop the cultivation work?

There is a tendency in Bangladesh to use nature’s resources for immediate gain, and not treat them as living ecosystems whose value exceeds what they can provide. This is made worse by routine disregard for laws, an acute lack of enforcement, and repeated use of political patronage for a senseless desire for profit. In a climate-vulnerable country like Bangladesh, coastal mangroves (which surround the reserved forest in question) shield communities from cyclones and storm surges, and their destruction strips away an effective natural defence.

Local communities should be empowered to be stewards of the forests, not mere beneficiaries. We urge the government to thoroughly investigate the leasing of forest land and ensure accountability for those responsible. Coastal regions are certainly well-suited for watermelon cultivation, but it should never come at the cost of a forest’s health. Genuine institutional goodwill, matched by enforcement, can make all the difference.​
 

COP31 should be able to deliver on promises

As the UN climate conference (COP31) approaches at Antalya in Türkiye from November 9 to 20, Bangladesh has a strong case to present before the international community. Being one of the countries most exposed to the adverse impacts of climate change, it has learnt through bitter experience how to cope with cyclones, floods, river erosion, salinity intrusion and droughts. Notably, the country's community-based disaster preparedness, early warning arrangements and cyclone shelters have helped save countless lives over the decades. It is, therefore, commendable that Bangladesh is going to showcase these locally-led initiatives at the climate summit. Also, its efforts towards afforestation, renewable energy, environment-friendly jute products and other green programmes deserve wider exposure. But survival of people during a cyclone is not the whole story. Consider the losses to their homes, crops, employment and livelihoods long after the cataclysm has passed. These are the issues that need to be brought to the fore at Antalya.

However, presenting its disaster adaptation experience alone will not suffice. Bangladesh should also take a leading role, alongside other climate-vulnerable nations, in pressing rich countries to make good on their repeatedly made promises of financial and technological support. Notably, its updated Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC 3.0) aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 20.31 per cent by 2035, requiring US$116.18 billion, including US$90.23 billion in international support. Its National Adaptation Plan, on the other hand, envisages investments of around USD$230 billion by 2050. Obviously, these are no small amounts for an economy already under fiscal pressure. Climate assistance in that case should come principally as grants rather than loans. Bangladesh should also seek technology transfer, capacity-building and technical assistance through the proposed Belém Action Mechanism (BAM) for a 'Just Transition'. With graduation from the LDC category approaching, it needs to develop a new diplomatic identity so that its economic security and claims as a climate-vulnerable nation are not compromised.

Now, the question is whether COP31 is going to be another climate summit of just talks. It would be worthwhile to recall that the Paris Agreement of 2015 was followed by lofty climate ambitions, but little was done to support the victims of global warming. The COP29 agreement, for instance, envisaged mobilising US$300 billion annually by 2035 led by developed nations, while COP30 in Brazil called for scaling climate finance to US$1.3 trillion a year and tripling adaptation finance by 2035. But where is the guarantee that these figures will translate into money reaching the affected communities? Worse still, major economies continue investing in fossil fuels while promising emission reductions. Environmental groups including Greenpeace have raised concerns about this contradiction, while Urgewald, a non-profit environmental and human rights organization, has questioned the continued coal expansion plans of some nations. Small wonder that critics often dismiss these grand international gatherings as little more than talking shops. Their scepticism cannot be dispelled merely through another round of declarations.

The power-sharing arrangement whereby Türkiye will preside over COP31 and Australia will steer the negotiations may provide an opportunity to break with the past. But the merits of such an arrangement have to be proved through results. The Antalya climate summit should narrow its focus from pledges to schedules for financing and measurable implementation of earlier commitments. Rich nations should come forward with support for adaptation, clean technologies and the transition from fossil fuels without jeopardising jobs and livelihoods in poorer economies. Bangladesh, for its part, needs to present credible projects backed by evidence, coordinate its climate diplomacy with other vulnerable countries and make its own green commitments work on the ground. After three decades of negotiations, it is time the global climate forum moved beyond assurances to implementation. Hopefully, COP31 would be remembered not for the speeches delivered there, but for what it did for the people bearing the worst consequences of climate change.​
 

PKDefense Forums: Country-by-Country Military Discussions

Log In Register Forums
Videos
Latest
Back