Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
what side are the Jews on ?
Press space to scroll through posts
War Archive
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
(((both sides))) ?
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
isko dekho, Sweden ka asli white nationalist pagan type
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
It’s probably local security for a Jewish gated community in Kiev
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Man just in the last fortnight or so imam Putin has gone all out to grab as much land as possible before the imminent uki surrender. Ukraine bicharay k lund lugg gaey hain. It’s really horrible what has happened to that god forsaken country.
This guy Zalintsky chutiya has destroyed his own country playing Zia ul Huq basically. Just a dumb ass person who had no idea what on earth he is getting himself into.
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
EU ka kaam, got their grubby pawprints all over it.
Boris ko utha dia hibernation se when they knew the risk, they were just counting on the US to back em.. Trump ne inko middil finger de di
they running around like headless chicken now...
maza aa raha hai ye sab dekh k, this is glorious lol
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Ukraine as an entity is finished now bhai. Imam Putin will swallow 25% of its territory and totally dominate its politics. Ukraine has completely been demolished as a country and soon as a nation.
Khamenei sahb issued a statement couple of days ago when he showed a letter he wrote to zalinski before this war started, warning him to not do this and count on the west as saviors. He warned him that the west will betray you.
He is the ultimate manchurian candidate this zalinsky.
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Ukna bhot purana scene hai, western provinces of Lvov/Lviv types totally hated communists, inspired by the National Socialists of Germany. Inka lafda not so much race, but ideology ka hai.. even Poles, same scene, hate communism and Russia because cold war me they feel they were held back and exploited.
Holodmor etc check karo.
Expansionists Americans and EU sparked it all, took a gamble on Boris' response.. now they're finding out
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Svoboda (political party) - Wikipedia
Azov battalion, guys with the black sun ans SS tats and paraphernalia generally..
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Putin ke mulasmand dalits of Chechnya, the Vostok battalion.. unhone Azov ki acchi bajai thi
literal nazis and chechen mujh ka jung
literal nazis and chechen mujh ka jung
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Putin ke mulasmand dalits of Chechnya, the Vostok battalion.. unhone Azov ki acchi bajai thi
literal nazis and chechen mujh ka jung
Cheechuns mofos and these other central Asian’s form the ISIS/Daesh core. They are brought in by the CIA and put to work causing chaos wherever deployed in the ME. Lot of Al-Qaeda is also staffed by central asians.
Look, behind muzlim terror sits the west……
Pretty fukkin simple.
Iran kills these basturds everywhere, hence unpopular among the muzlims.
Saif
Senior Member
- Messages
- 14,830
- Reaction score
- 7,674
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Macron proposes French nuclear extension, Ukraine troop deployment
In an address to the nation, Macron said that the French were "legitimately worried" about the start of a "new era" after Trump began his second stint in the White House by reversing US policy on Ukraine and risking a historic rupture with Europe
Macron proposes French nuclear extension, Ukraine troop deployment
President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday announced he would discuss extending France's nuclear deterrent to European partners and raised the possibility of sending European troops to Ukraine to enforce a peace deal, as Europe scrambles to respond to Donald Trump's upending of the transatlantic alliance.
In an address to the nation, Macron said that the French were "legitimately worried" about the start of a "new era" after Trump began his second stint in the White House by reversing US policy on Ukraine and risking a historic rupture with Europe.
"I want to believe that the United States will stay by our side but we have to be prepared for that not to be the case," he said bluntly.
"The future of Europe does not have to be decided in Washington or Moscow," he added.
Trump has made clear his desire to swiftly end the war caused by Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine through direct negotiations with Moscow.
But Macron offered a stark picture of Russia's aggressive behaviour, which he said does "not seem to know borders" after its invasion of Ukraine.
"Russia has become, at the moment I am speaking to you and for the years to come, a threat to France and Europe," he said. "It would be madness to remain a spectator in this world of danger."
"Who can believe that this Russia of today will stop at Ukraine?" he asked. "Russia has become a threat for France and Europe."
But he warned Trump that "peace cannot be agreed at any cost" and there cannot be a ceasefire that is "too fragile".
'Won't fight today'
Ahead of an EU summit Thursday on rearming the continent, he stressed the need for "new budget choices and extra investments" to boost defence spending in France.
Meanwhile, Macron said he would open a debate on extending France's nuclear deterrent to other European nations, following a "historic" call from likely next German chancellor Friedrich Merz on extending that umbrella of protection.
"I have decided to open up the strategic debate on the protection of our allies on the European continent through our nuclear deterrent," he said, while adding that any decision on nuclear weapons use would remain with the French head of state.
Merz, whose right-wing party won the Germany elections, said last month he wanted a discussion on "nuclear sharing" with France and Britain, Europe's only nuclear powers other than Russia.
Warning that "Russia can no longer be trusted to keep its word", Macron also said once a deal is signed Ukraine's allies must make sure it is "not invaded again by Russia".
He reaffirmed that European military forces could be sent to Ukraine if a peace accord was signed to guarantee "respect" of a peace deal.
A peace agreement for Ukraine would be backed "perhaps, by the deployment of European forces," Macron said.
"They won't go to fight today, they won't go to fight on the front line, but they would be there once a peace deal is signed, to guarantee it is fully respected," he said.
He added European military chiefs of staff would meet in Paris next week to discuss how to support Ukraine after a peace deal.
Incomprehensible'
Both Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer held separate talks with Trump in Washington last week, followed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky who was subjected to an excruciating public dressing-down by Trump and his Vice President JD Vance.
But Zelensky appears to be seeking to lower the temperature after Friday's White House bust-up with Trump where the US president accused the Ukrainian leader of not wanting peace and "gambling with World War III".
Zelensky Tuesday called for a "truce" in the sea and sky as a first step to ending the three-year war with Russia, echoing an idea evoked by Macron at talks in London hosted by Starmer at the weekend.
Meanwhile, Macron is mulling a joint visit to Washington alongside Zelensky and Starmer, the French government spokeswoman Sophie Primas said Wednesday.
The French presidency then sought to dampen expectations saying no new visit by Macron to Washington was being considered "at this stage".
Coincidentally, Macron after his address met Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban at the Elysee. Orban is an admirer not just of Trump but also Putin, and has repeatedly broken a united EU front on Ukraine.
In another indication of tension with Washington, Macron on Wednesday called planned US tariffs on European products "incomprehensible", adding that he hoped to "dissuade" Trump from imposing them.
President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday announced he would discuss extending France's nuclear deterrent to European partners and raised the possibility of sending European troops to Ukraine to enforce a peace deal, as Europe scrambles to respond to Donald Trump's upending of the transatlantic alliance.
In an address to the nation, Macron said that the French were "legitimately worried" about the start of a "new era" after Trump began his second stint in the White House by reversing US policy on Ukraine and risking a historic rupture with Europe.
"I want to believe that the United States will stay by our side but we have to be prepared for that not to be the case," he said bluntly.
"The future of Europe does not have to be decided in Washington or Moscow," he added.
Trump has made clear his desire to swiftly end the war caused by Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine through direct negotiations with Moscow.
But Macron offered a stark picture of Russia's aggressive behaviour, which he said does "not seem to know borders" after its invasion of Ukraine.
"Russia has become, at the moment I am speaking to you and for the years to come, a threat to France and Europe," he said. "It would be madness to remain a spectator in this world of danger."
"Who can believe that this Russia of today will stop at Ukraine?" he asked. "Russia has become a threat for France and Europe."
But he warned Trump that "peace cannot be agreed at any cost" and there cannot be a ceasefire that is "too fragile".
'Won't fight today'
Ahead of an EU summit Thursday on rearming the continent, he stressed the need for "new budget choices and extra investments" to boost defence spending in France.
Meanwhile, Macron said he would open a debate on extending France's nuclear deterrent to other European nations, following a "historic" call from likely next German chancellor Friedrich Merz on extending that umbrella of protection.
"I have decided to open up the strategic debate on the protection of our allies on the European continent through our nuclear deterrent," he said, while adding that any decision on nuclear weapons use would remain with the French head of state.
Merz, whose right-wing party won the Germany elections, said last month he wanted a discussion on "nuclear sharing" with France and Britain, Europe's only nuclear powers other than Russia.
Warning that "Russia can no longer be trusted to keep its word", Macron also said once a deal is signed Ukraine's allies must make sure it is "not invaded again by Russia".
He reaffirmed that European military forces could be sent to Ukraine if a peace accord was signed to guarantee "respect" of a peace deal.
A peace agreement for Ukraine would be backed "perhaps, by the deployment of European forces," Macron said.
"They won't go to fight today, they won't go to fight on the front line, but they would be there once a peace deal is signed, to guarantee it is fully respected," he said.
He added European military chiefs of staff would meet in Paris next week to discuss how to support Ukraine after a peace deal.
Incomprehensible'
Both Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer held separate talks with Trump in Washington last week, followed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky who was subjected to an excruciating public dressing-down by Trump and his Vice President JD Vance.
But Zelensky appears to be seeking to lower the temperature after Friday's White House bust-up with Trump where the US president accused the Ukrainian leader of not wanting peace and "gambling with World War III".
Zelensky Tuesday called for a "truce" in the sea and sky as a first step to ending the three-year war with Russia, echoing an idea evoked by Macron at talks in London hosted by Starmer at the weekend.
Meanwhile, Macron is mulling a joint visit to Washington alongside Zelensky and Starmer, the French government spokeswoman Sophie Primas said Wednesday.
The French presidency then sought to dampen expectations saying no new visit by Macron to Washington was being considered "at this stage".
Coincidentally, Macron after his address met Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban at the Elysee. Orban is an admirer not just of Trump but also Putin, and has repeatedly broken a united EU front on Ukraine.
In another indication of tension with Washington, Macron on Wednesday called planned US tariffs on European products "incomprehensible", adding that he hoped to "dissuade" Trump from imposing them.
Saif
Senior Member
- Messages
- 14,830
- Reaction score
- 7,674
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Trump and Zelensky: Is the damage irreparable?
For Trump, it’s always, “What’s in it for me?”
Trump and Zelensky: Is the damage irreparable?
US President Donald Trump, along with Vice-President JD Vance, meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in Washington, DC, US on February 28, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS
US President Donald Trump and the Republicans gave many indications that they were not fans of the Biden-era foreign policy towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which was sticking with Ukraine for "as long as it takes." Before his second inauguration, what Trump would do with US military support for Ukraine was a tense topic under his "America First" transactional foreign policy. Then it really exploded, much beyond the worst nightmare of European leaders. Vice-President JD Vance and Trump attacked Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, with Trump going on to accuse Zelensky of playing with "World War III." During the internationally televised meltdown, the message was clear, if it had not been before: in the current US foreign policy, the US is only interested in supporting Ukraine if it serves the current president and his administration's broader political goals.
Underpinning what was largely an unstrategic—not to mention immoral—and ill-tempered treatment of the Ukrainian leader, is Trump's larger vision that the post-World War II-era geopolitics is one that has led to what he calls "America's decline." For Trump, it's always, "What's in it for me?" And that policy is framed as "America First." But Trump's notions about what is to his advantage remains questionable. He believes that his country has the power to secure any deal under him, similar to Zelensky's foe, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has broken ranks with European leaders on Putin. Before Zelensky's visit, he called the Ukrainian leader a dictator, and said Putin should be allowed to return to G7, from which he was expelled in 2014 after annexing Crimea.
On Monday, the US president paused all military aid to Ukraine, as reported by Bloomberg. Prior to the news, Trump had again taken to social media to chide Zelensky's assessment of the war with Russia. In a social media post, pointing to recent comments in which Zelensky said the end of his country's war with Russia remains far off, Trump said the US "will not put up with it for much longer," adding that Zelensky's assessment was "the worst statement that could have been made." To reporters on Monday afternoon, Trump continued to suggest that Zelensky "doesn't want to make a deal," and that one could "be made very fast." Trump went on to say he believed that "Russia wants to make a deal," and that "certainly, the people of Ukraine want to make a deal. They've suffered more than anybody else."
The warnings from the meltdown—and the clear fact that Trump openly dislikes Zelensky—extended to Europe. Zelensky left early; the deal to offer Ukraine's rarest minerals to the US remained unsigned on the table. European leaders have stepped up, and the UK has taken on an urgency to seize the moment. The UK signed a $2 billion deal with Ukraine and paved a way for the country to tap into Russian frozen assets, which have been under Europe's jurisdiction. The deal will allow Ukraine to use export finance to buy more than 5,000 air defence missiles, which will be made in Belfast.
On Monday, while Trump continued to sideline Ukraine, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also declared a four-point plan for Ukraine, which included a "coalition of the willing" that would come together to draw up a peace plan to end the war. He said he would present it to the US president for his support. Unlike NATO and other alliances, "a coalition of willing" is designed to be palatable to the US president in the sense of nation-states that are willing to join in by not sending in their troops. The UK and France have mentioned that they are willing to commit troops in the event of a peace deal.
Starmer, European leaders, and Zelensky reiterated that the success of a peace deal would need strong US backing. Starmer told the UK members of parliament that Trump's commitment to achieving peace in Ukraine is "sincere." As the British prime minister spoke of the "heavy lifting" that Europe would have to do but reiterated the need for US support in the House of Commons, the US president posted on social media, saying, "Europe… stated flatly that they cannot do the job without the US—probably not a great statement to have been made in terms of a show of strength against Russia. What are they thinking?"
Trump's strangely antagonistic statements towards Europe on the issue of Ukraine, along with the bullying of Zelensky, has generated rife speculations of US military aid cuts in the media. According to analysts, large spending cuts would definitely result in greater loss of life and could easily result in Ukraine losing the war.
The war is currently stalemated, but Russia has the initiative. Ukraine's defences on the eastern front are weak, though not breaking; it retains an enclave in Russia's Kursk region. Russia has made small but continuous gains in Ukraine's east since the Ukrainian counteroffensive halted in November 2023, but at a high cost. In 2024, the Russians suffered more than 420,000 casualties, and the combat losses since 2022 are set to cross one million by mid-year, and Putin has not yet called for a second mobilisation. The US provides Ukraine with the full spectrum of equipment that a military needs.
To understand the importance of the US, militarily for Ukraine: the packages run the gamut from heavy weapons to munitions—artillery shells and air defence missiles—to medical equipment and cold weather gear supplies. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), recent packages appear to provide the monthly production of equipment that is in short supply in the US, such as artillery shells, air defence systems, and anti-tank weapons. Around a dozen HIMARS to boost Ukrainian firepower and a dozen National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS) for air defence were contracted in 2022 and will soon appear on the battlefield in Ukraine.
The focus on military equipment should not discount the "soft" support—training and intelligence data, for example—that the US provides. Although such support cannot be counted in the same way that equipment can, it has been critical in building Ukraine's military capabilities, and Europe cannot replace the same intelligence as to when Russia would attack or not.
Trump's approach to the so-called "peace deal," which he keeps referring to, has so far included dialogue with Putin. On February 12, Donald Trump said Ukraine would not recover all its territories or join NATO, and said he would meet with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. On February 13, Trump broke ranks with G7 leaders, who expelled Russia after it annexed Crimea in 2014, and said Putin should be allowed to return. For Trump, his path to "peace" between Russia and Ukraine is an image of himself standing between the countries. He has not agreed to provide any security guarantees that Starmer has spoken of, and solely focused on the deal to open up Ukrainian minerals to US companies, arguing that the presence of US workers in Ukraine itself would discourage Russia from attacking or encroaching on the Ukrainian territory.
But if Trump's ultimate goal is normalisation with Moscow, and he is willing to make that deal, where is the line where he would settle with Putin? Vladimir Putin is not a reliable ally, with the robust track record of turning back on agreements, and if Trump wants to rewrite the history of the US and Russia, what are the concessions he would be willing to settle on with Russia? If those concessions come at the cost of Ukraine's sovereignty, neither Ukraine nor Europe would be onboard. On Monday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, "We see that the collective West has begun to partially lose its unity."
While Zelensky has said the US-Ukraine relationship is salvageable, and Europe refuses to—on the diplomatic front—reconsider the US as a steady ally, the prospects for Ukraine remain as bleak as ever. Trump continues his divisive language, but as we have seen before, his actions are often divorced from his words. US relations with Russia have always enjoyed a rare bipartisan consensus, even during recent times, despite talks of aid cuts. But the current atmosphere seems to have upended the earlier equation—for now. After the fiery meeting that drew backlash, Trumps cabinet, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others, continue to back him and have vaguely said that the efforts to end the war need a "reset." It is unclear whether the entire administration remains aligned with Trump on whatever position he has on normalising relations with Russia, but his critics have accused him of essentially selling out Ukraine.
In the coming days, the best case scenario would be the continuation of US and European aid to stabilise front lines, defend Russian attacks, and find a footing for a negotiated settlement, and perhaps Russia would be more willing to make a deal as its cost of war piles up, as casualties are looking to surpass a million. What will happen is frankly too soon to tell, but the way the meeting-turned-shouting match between Zelensky and Trump blew up on live television—juxtaposed with the new tone of US foreign policy—the writing is on the wall: expect the unexpected.
Ramisa Rob is in-charge of Geopolitical Insights at The Daily Star.
US President Donald Trump, along with Vice-President JD Vance, meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in Washington, DC, US on February 28, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS
US President Donald Trump and the Republicans gave many indications that they were not fans of the Biden-era foreign policy towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which was sticking with Ukraine for "as long as it takes." Before his second inauguration, what Trump would do with US military support for Ukraine was a tense topic under his "America First" transactional foreign policy. Then it really exploded, much beyond the worst nightmare of European leaders. Vice-President JD Vance and Trump attacked Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, with Trump going on to accuse Zelensky of playing with "World War III." During the internationally televised meltdown, the message was clear, if it had not been before: in the current US foreign policy, the US is only interested in supporting Ukraine if it serves the current president and his administration's broader political goals.
Underpinning what was largely an unstrategic—not to mention immoral—and ill-tempered treatment of the Ukrainian leader, is Trump's larger vision that the post-World War II-era geopolitics is one that has led to what he calls "America's decline." For Trump, it's always, "What's in it for me?" And that policy is framed as "America First." But Trump's notions about what is to his advantage remains questionable. He believes that his country has the power to secure any deal under him, similar to Zelensky's foe, Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has broken ranks with European leaders on Putin. Before Zelensky's visit, he called the Ukrainian leader a dictator, and said Putin should be allowed to return to G7, from which he was expelled in 2014 after annexing Crimea.
On Monday, the US president paused all military aid to Ukraine, as reported by Bloomberg. Prior to the news, Trump had again taken to social media to chide Zelensky's assessment of the war with Russia. In a social media post, pointing to recent comments in which Zelensky said the end of his country's war with Russia remains far off, Trump said the US "will not put up with it for much longer," adding that Zelensky's assessment was "the worst statement that could have been made." To reporters on Monday afternoon, Trump continued to suggest that Zelensky "doesn't want to make a deal," and that one could "be made very fast." Trump went on to say he believed that "Russia wants to make a deal," and that "certainly, the people of Ukraine want to make a deal. They've suffered more than anybody else."
The warnings from the meltdown—and the clear fact that Trump openly dislikes Zelensky—extended to Europe. Zelensky left early; the deal to offer Ukraine's rarest minerals to the US remained unsigned on the table. European leaders have stepped up, and the UK has taken on an urgency to seize the moment. The UK signed a $2 billion deal with Ukraine and paved a way for the country to tap into Russian frozen assets, which have been under Europe's jurisdiction. The deal will allow Ukraine to use export finance to buy more than 5,000 air defence missiles, which will be made in Belfast.
On Monday, while Trump continued to sideline Ukraine, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also declared a four-point plan for Ukraine, which included a "coalition of the willing" that would come together to draw up a peace plan to end the war. He said he would present it to the US president for his support. Unlike NATO and other alliances, "a coalition of willing" is designed to be palatable to the US president in the sense of nation-states that are willing to join in by not sending in their troops. The UK and France have mentioned that they are willing to commit troops in the event of a peace deal.
Starmer, European leaders, and Zelensky reiterated that the success of a peace deal would need strong US backing. Starmer told the UK members of parliament that Trump's commitment to achieving peace in Ukraine is "sincere." As the British prime minister spoke of the "heavy lifting" that Europe would have to do but reiterated the need for US support in the House of Commons, the US president posted on social media, saying, "Europe… stated flatly that they cannot do the job without the US—probably not a great statement to have been made in terms of a show of strength against Russia. What are they thinking?"
Trump's strangely antagonistic statements towards Europe on the issue of Ukraine, along with the bullying of Zelensky, has generated rife speculations of US military aid cuts in the media. According to analysts, large spending cuts would definitely result in greater loss of life and could easily result in Ukraine losing the war.
The war is currently stalemated, but Russia has the initiative. Ukraine's defences on the eastern front are weak, though not breaking; it retains an enclave in Russia's Kursk region. Russia has made small but continuous gains in Ukraine's east since the Ukrainian counteroffensive halted in November 2023, but at a high cost. In 2024, the Russians suffered more than 420,000 casualties, and the combat losses since 2022 are set to cross one million by mid-year, and Putin has not yet called for a second mobilisation. The US provides Ukraine with the full spectrum of equipment that a military needs.
To understand the importance of the US, militarily for Ukraine: the packages run the gamut from heavy weapons to munitions—artillery shells and air defence missiles—to medical equipment and cold weather gear supplies. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), recent packages appear to provide the monthly production of equipment that is in short supply in the US, such as artillery shells, air defence systems, and anti-tank weapons. Around a dozen HIMARS to boost Ukrainian firepower and a dozen National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS) for air defence were contracted in 2022 and will soon appear on the battlefield in Ukraine.
The focus on military equipment should not discount the "soft" support—training and intelligence data, for example—that the US provides. Although such support cannot be counted in the same way that equipment can, it has been critical in building Ukraine's military capabilities, and Europe cannot replace the same intelligence as to when Russia would attack or not.
Trump's approach to the so-called "peace deal," which he keeps referring to, has so far included dialogue with Putin. On February 12, Donald Trump said Ukraine would not recover all its territories or join NATO, and said he would meet with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. On February 13, Trump broke ranks with G7 leaders, who expelled Russia after it annexed Crimea in 2014, and said Putin should be allowed to return. For Trump, his path to "peace" between Russia and Ukraine is an image of himself standing between the countries. He has not agreed to provide any security guarantees that Starmer has spoken of, and solely focused on the deal to open up Ukrainian minerals to US companies, arguing that the presence of US workers in Ukraine itself would discourage Russia from attacking or encroaching on the Ukrainian territory.
But if Trump's ultimate goal is normalisation with Moscow, and he is willing to make that deal, where is the line where he would settle with Putin? Vladimir Putin is not a reliable ally, with the robust track record of turning back on agreements, and if Trump wants to rewrite the history of the US and Russia, what are the concessions he would be willing to settle on with Russia? If those concessions come at the cost of Ukraine's sovereignty, neither Ukraine nor Europe would be onboard. On Monday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, "We see that the collective West has begun to partially lose its unity."
While Zelensky has said the US-Ukraine relationship is salvageable, and Europe refuses to—on the diplomatic front—reconsider the US as a steady ally, the prospects for Ukraine remain as bleak as ever. Trump continues his divisive language, but as we have seen before, his actions are often divorced from his words. US relations with Russia have always enjoyed a rare bipartisan consensus, even during recent times, despite talks of aid cuts. But the current atmosphere seems to have upended the earlier equation—for now. After the fiery meeting that drew backlash, Trumps cabinet, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others, continue to back him and have vaguely said that the efforts to end the war need a "reset." It is unclear whether the entire administration remains aligned with Trump on whatever position he has on normalising relations with Russia, but his critics have accused him of essentially selling out Ukraine.
In the coming days, the best case scenario would be the continuation of US and European aid to stabilise front lines, defend Russian attacks, and find a footing for a negotiated settlement, and perhaps Russia would be more willing to make a deal as its cost of war piles up, as casualties are looking to surpass a million. What will happen is frankly too soon to tell, but the way the meeting-turned-shouting match between Zelensky and Trump blew up on live television—juxtaposed with the new tone of US foreign policy—the writing is on the wall: expect the unexpected.
Ramisa Rob is in-charge of Geopolitical Insights at The Daily Star.
Saif
Senior Member
- Messages
- 14,830
- Reaction score
- 7,674
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Zelensky ready for Russia talks, mineral deal
US President Donald Trump said later on Tuesday that Ukraine’s leader Volodymyr Zelensky has told him Kyiv was ready for talks with Russia and the finalisation of a US minerals deal, days after the pair’s explosive White House meeting.
Zelensky ready for Russia talks, mineral deal
Says Trump during his speech to Congress; US curbs intelligence sharing with Ukraine
Says Trump during his speech to Congress; US curbs intelligence sharing with Ukraine
- Trump tells Greenland US will get it 'one way or the other'
- US 'taking back' Panama Canal after ports deal: Trump
US President Donald Trump said later on Tuesday that Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky has told him Kyiv was ready for talks with Russia and the finalisation of a US minerals deal, days after the pair's explosive White House meeting.
The dramatic collapse of Kyiv and Washington's wartime alliance has played out in the open since the televised dispute in the Oval Office last week, followed by Ukraine's top ally suspending crucial military aid.
Google News LinkFor all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel.
Zelensky has since sought to bring Trump back onside, posting on social media that their clash was "regrettable" and he wanted "to make things right".
In his partisan speech to US Congress, Trump read aloud from a letter he said he recently received from Zelensky, which matched the social media statement.
Russia welcomed Zelensky's statement that Kyiv is willing to negotiate over the war, but it is not yet clear to Moscow who it might be negotiating with, the Kremlin said yesterday.
Meanwhile, the US has "paused" intelligence sharing with Ukraine, CIA director John Ratcliffe said yesterday.
During his address to Congress, Trump urged Greenland to choose to join the United States but vowed to take the Danish-ruled island "one way or the other" -- whatever the locals decide.
The US had started to take back the Panama Canal after a deal by a Hong Kong firm to sell ports to a US-led consortium, he also said. "To further enhance our national security, my administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal, and we've already started doing it," he told Congress.
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
This much hyped 'minerals' deal is a hype for the most part. We're scraping the barrel here bhai.
What mineral 'deal'......?
20 others also with mineral deals, dying to make it happen no?
China in da US pocket for mineral deals no? China is a US toady and we know it just like Indian dalit.
Third class western media making a mountain out of a mole hill no?
What mineral 'deal'......?
20 others also with mineral deals, dying to make it happen no?
China in da US pocket for mineral deals no? China is a US toady and we know it just like Indian dalit.
Third class western media making a mountain out of a mole hill no?
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
They're hardened fighters, big reputation.
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Haan to CIA/ MI-6 training deti hae na muzlim dalit ko no?
Dis da core issue no?
Behind 'muzlim terror' sits da west no?
Every chutiya knows dis bhai.......no matter how chutiya he is......
Sharma Ji
Senior Member
- Messages
- 8,413
- Reaction score
- 91
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
Woh raazi bhi ho jaatein hain US ki help lene ke liye, as long as their smalltime jihadi plans serve the US' much grander strategy. Unko lagta hai ki woh bhi Gulfies type swinnng in dolla and gold ho jayenge !
Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Messages
- 6,668
- Reaction score
- 4,658
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
All muzlim jihadi on CIA/ MI-6 bhatta. Nobody admits it in public even if their lives depended upon it.Woh raazi bhi ho jaatein hain US ki help lene ke liye, as long as their smalltime jihadi plans serve the US' much grander strategy. Unko lagta hai ki woh bhi Gulfies type swinnng in dolla and gold ho jayenge !
