Home Login Watch Videos Wars Movies

[🇮🇳] "Brahmin Boys Dragged by the Hair and Beaten: Shankaracharya Stopped from Bathing in the Ganges — BJP’s Downfall Inevitable?”

[🇮🇳] "Brahmin Boys Dragged by the Hair and Beaten: Shankaracharya Stopped from Bathing in the Ganges — BJP’s Downfall Inevitable?”
More threads by Krishna with Flute

G   Indian Defense
Date of Event: Jan 21, 2026
Brahmin Boys Dragged by the Hair and Beaten: Shankaracharya Stopped from Bathing in the Ganges — BJP’s Downfall Inevitable?

Invoking the phrase “Vinash Kale Viparit Buddhihi,” recent incidents reported along the banks of the holy Ganges reflect a deeply disturbing breakdown of restraint and respect for faith. Brahmin boys were allegedly subjected to extreme assault—dragged, abused, and beaten—while attempting to perform a ritual bath, an act that holds profound religious significance in Hindu tradition. In a separate but equally alarming episode, a Shankaracharya was reportedly stopped from taking a holy dip, and saints were manhandled, sparking widespread outrage. Such acts, if established, represent a grave violation of religious freedom and personal dignity, and are viewed by many as among the worst insults to Hinduism’s sacred practices and custodians. Civil society leaders and religious communities have demanded swift, impartial investigations, accountability for those responsible, and concrete measures to ensure that sacred spaces remain safe, respectful, and accessible to all devotees, irrespective of identity. The worst thing is that it happened in the reign of Yogi Adityanath.


Magh Mela Row | Swami Sarawasti gets notice for using ‘Shankaracharya’ title, he says admin interfering with age-old traditions​

Mela authority cites 2022 SC order; Cong, SP and Hindu Mahasabha condemn action​

Written by Maulshree Seth
Lucknow | Updated: January 21, 2026 08:03 AM IST
clock_logo
6 min read
google-preferred-btn


Print

Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati at Sangam during the Magh Mela, in Prayagraj on Monday. (ANI Photo)
Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati at Sangam during the Magh Mela, in Prayagraj on Monday. (ANI Photo)
The ongoing tussle between Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati of Jyotishpeeth Badrinath and the Prayagraj administration in Uttar Pradesh over Mauni Amavasya snan at the Sangam escalated on Tuesday after the Magha Mela Authority, citing a 2022 Supreme Court order, issued a notice to the Swami, asking him to explain why he is using the “Shankaracharya” title.

The Mela authority has given him 24 hours to comply.

In response, Swami Saraswati’s team said it would take legal action against the authority and accused it of interfering with the age-old traditions of Shankaracharya and his disciples. The team has also started an online signature campaign against the administration, seeking supporters of “Sanatan” to join them.

Swami Saraswati said notices were selectively issued against him because he raised demands related to cow protection.

On Sunday, during the auspicious Mauni Amavasya, Swami Saraswati and his supporters were on their way to take a dip at the Sangam when police allegedly stopped him.


Reacting to the Mela authority’s notice to the seer, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav accused the BJP and its allies of being divisive and arrogant. Calling the Mela authority’s notice to Swami “highly condemnable”, the SP chief, in a post on X, said those seeking certificates should first present their own credentials.

The Congress also slammed the BJP and asked whether any government, chief minister, or prime minister has any right to question the status of the Shankaracharya. “BJP people who used to ask Muslims – ‘kaagaz dikhao’ (show the papers) – are now telling the same to a top Hindu seer… This is against all traditions. What is happening is unprecedented. Every single Hindu across the world is watching what is happening in Uttar Pradesh. These people are sinners. They will never be forgiven,” Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera said at a press meet in Delhi.

“When Prime Minister Narendra Modi bowed his head before Avimukteshwaranand ji – till then he was a Shankaracharya. As long as Avimukteshwaranand ji did not question the government about cow meat – till then he was a Shankaracharya… But now he is no longer a Shankaracharya because he did not bow his head before the king, and that is why the Yogi Adityanath government is demanding papers from him today,” the Congress leader added.

Story continues below. Subscribe to see fewer ads.

Meanwhile, the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha on Tuesday, in an open letter addressed to UP CM Yogi Adityanath, demanded strict action against officials allegedly involved in “stopping” Swami Saraswati from taking bath at the Sangam on Sunday. Seeking a public apology, the Hindu Mahasabha said the incident “amounted to an insult to saints and seers”. The outfit alleged it was part of a conspiracy to “tarnish the image of the Uttar Pradesh government and Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath”, and said any disrespect to saints was unacceptable.

In its notice dated January 19, the Mela Authority referred to a civil appeal pending in the Supreme Court and asked him to explain how he was using the title of Shankaracharya of the Jyotish Peeth.

Devotees gather in large numbers at the Magh Mela Kshetra to take a holy dip at Sangam, on the occasion of Mauni Amavasya, in Prayagraj on Sunday. (ANI Photo)
Devotees gather in large numbers at the Magh Mela Kshetra to take a holy dip at Sangam, on the occasion of Mauni Amavasya, in Prayagraj on Sunday. (ANI Photo)
The notice stated that since no further order has been passed in the plea, until the Supreme Court disposes of the appeal in question or passes a further order regarding the consecration, no Dharmacharya can be consecrated as Shankaracharya of Jyotishpeeth.

“It is clear that no Dharmacharya has been consecrated as Shankaracharya of Jyotishpeeth. Despite this, you have declared and displayed yourself as Shankaracharya of Jyotishpeeth on a board installed at your camp during the Magh Mela… This act of yours demonstrates disregard for the order of the Supreme Court,” said the notice.

Story continues below. Subscribe to see fewer ads.

“… besides complying with the above order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, you should also clarify within 24 hours of receipt of this letter as to how you are using the word Shankaracharya before your name or promoting/propagating yourself as the Shankaracharya of Jyotishpeeth?” it added.

Speaking to The Indian Express, Sanjay Pandey, communications in-charge of Swami Avimukteshwaranand, said, “…we are going to reply accordingly. However, matters related to Shankaracharya are [part of a tradition spanning] over 2,500 years, where the position is [passed on] to a chosen disciple. It is a matter of Sanatan tradition, which the administration should not interfere with.”

Questioning the timing of the notice, Pandey added that they had been camping at the site for the past month and wondered why the administration had “suddenly woken up” to the issue of the title.

The Mela Authority and District Administration maintained that no one was stopped from taking the “snan,” but said the Swami’s cavalcade and procession were not permitted in accordance with the prescribed system to ensure the safety of pilgrims.

Story continues below. Subscribe to see fewer ads.

Prayagraj District Magistrate, Manish Kumar Verma, told mediapersons that following the SC’s 2022 directions, the administration sought legal opinion on conferring the Shankaracharya protocol to Swami Avimukteshwaranand. Based on the recommendations, no such protocol has been accorded to him at any mela since then.

Refuting the allegations made by Swami Avimukteshwaranand and his followers, Prayagraj Divisional Commissioner Soumya Agarwal said no one was stopped from taking a snan.

However, she said, given the heavy crowd at the Sangam nose that day, Avimukteshwaranand was repeatedly requested to step down from his chariot and take the snan, as allowing the entire procession would have posed risks to the safety of pilgrims and Kalpavasis.

Officials said their repeated requests went unheeded, leading to a major block of over three hours.
Swami Avimukteshwaranand, however, alleged that the administration’s action against him was biased, claiming it stemmed from his criticism of the government’s functioning following last year’s stampede during the Kumbh Mela.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Aur tere baal bhi lambe hain.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Khamenei (+4)
Reactions: Sharma Ji

'VIP darshan' at Ujjain's Mahakaleshwar temple: SC rejects appeal challenging MP HC verdict​

Darpan Awasthi of Ujjain has moved the Supreme Court challenging the MP High Court’s August 28, 2025 order rejecting his plea.
A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi.


A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi.File photo | ANI
Suchitra Kalyan Mohanty

Updated on:
27 Jan 2026, 1:22 pm

3 min read
Add TNIE As A Trusted Source


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal challenging a Madhya Pradesh High Court verdict that upheld the practice of 'VIP darshan' at the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain.

The appeal, filed by Darpan Awasthi, demanded that equal opportunity for darshan is provided to all the devotees in Garbhagriha (sanctum sanctorum) at Shri Mahakaleshwar temple Ujjain without discriminating between general and VIP devotees.

"People who file such petitions are not genuine devotees and Courts are not supposed to decide guidelines or polices with respect to such subjects," said the three-judge bench of the apex court, comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, and Justices R Mahadevan and Joymalya Bagchi.

After hearing the counsel, Vishnu Jain, appearing for petitioner, the Court dismissed the plea and granted permission to the petitioner to the file a representation before the government authorities.

During the hearing, Jain argued that there should be a uniform policy on who is allowed to enter the Garbhagriha. "There is a violation of Article 14. Whether a person who should be allowed inside the garbhgriha, there should be a uniform policy of equal treatment."

A 'VIP' and an ordinary person visiting the Mahakal should both have the right to enter the garbha grih and offer water to the deity, Jain further contended.

The CJI-led bench, however, was not satisfied with the submissions of Jain, and clarified that it was not for the Court to decide. "Let those who are at the helm of affairs take a decision, not the Courts. If Courts start regulating who should be allowed to enter or who should not be, it's too much for the Courts," observed CJI Kant.

The petitioner, Darpan Awasthi, a resident of Ujjain, had approached the apex court against the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s judgment dated August 28, 2025, which rejected his plea.

In his appeal, Awasthi contended that the Administrative Committee of the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple cannot discriminate between VIP and general devotees, as such differentiation violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Seeking interim relief, Awasthi, through his counsel Vishnu Jain, urged the Supreme Court to grant an ex parte stay on the operation of the High Court’s August 28 order.

He further sought directions restraining the respondents, the Madhya Pradesh government, the Temple Administrator, the District Collector and the Superintendent of Police, from granting permission to VIPs, VVIPs, State Guests or other influential persons to perform pooja and rituals within the Garbhagriha of the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple.

According to the plea, the petitioner and other similarly placed devotees have been aggrieved by the temple committee’s practice of allowing VIP devotees to perform pooja and rituals inside the sanctum sanctorum, while denying the same opportunity to general devotees since 2023.
Advertisement


Awasthi argued that the committee cannot curtail the rights of general devotees to have darshan and perform pooja, as such rights are protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The plea noted that the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple Administrative Committee has been constituted under the provisions of the Shri Mahakaleshwar Adhiniyam, 1982, which, according to the petitioner, does not empower the committee to create special provisions for VIPs, politicians, bureaucrats, wealthy individuals or other influential persons.

Awasthi further submitted that the High Court failed to consider the core issue of how special provisions could be made for the entry of VIPs and VVIPs into the sanctum sanctorum for pooja and jalabhishek on special or other days, while denying the same right to general devotees.

“Every citizen has the right to worship in a temple, as guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution of India. The State or the Administrative Committee cannot discriminate between VIPs and the general public in matters of temple entry and worship, thereby frustrating the rights conferred under Articles 14 and 25,” the petitioner stated.
Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

Download the TNIE app to stay with us and follow the latest



Advertisement


 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Magh Mela row exposes divergent stands of UP CM Yogi, Deputy CM Maurya over seer’s protest​

Maurya said he bowed before the seer, requesting him to end the protest, close the chapter of controversy and take a holy dip at the Sangam.
UP CM Yogi Adityanath with Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya.


UP CM Yogi Adityanath with Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya.(Photo | PTI)
Namita Bajpai

LUCKNOW: Amid the ongoing controversy involving Jyotirpeeth Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand and the Magh Mela administration, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya have taken contrasting positions, issuing differing statements on the protest.

While Chief Minister Yogi, on Thursday, implicitly criticised the protest, describing it as a conspiracy to weaken Sanatan Dharma by elements masquerading as religious leaders, Deputy Chief Minister Maurya adopted a conciliatory approach.

He said he bowed before the seer, requesting him to end the protest, close the chapter of controversy and take a holy dip at the Sangam.

Conveying a message of restraint and respect, Maurya clarified, in response to questions over the alleged insult to the Shankaracharya, that disrespect to any revered saint, acharya or Shankaracharya was unacceptable.

He said that if any instance of disrespect or insult were to come to light, an inquiry would be conducted and action taken against those found guilty.

Maurya said the priority at present was to bring the controversy to an end. He said: “I pray at the feet of Shankaracharya requesting him to end whatever protest is ongoing after taking a dip in the Sangam.”

Earlier, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had said that for a yogi, saint and sanyasi, nothing was more important than religion and the nation.

He said a sanyasi had no personal property, adding that his wealth was his religion and the nation was his pride.

The Chief Minister had also said that elements who allegedly conspired to weaken Sanatan Dharma under its guise posed a threat to society. “It is necessary to be vigilant against such people,” he said.

Meanwhile, continuing his protest for the sixth day on Friday, the seer fell ill with a high fever, following which he went inside his vanity van at around 10 am. However, after 2 pm, he came out and sat on his chariot, resuming his dharna.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
After initial bravado and loud mouthing, Hindu Drohi Yogi is on backfoot. His Aura is fading rapidly. There is a crack in BJP and most of BJP cedar is in support of Shankaracharya. Many of them have started speaking openly in favor Shankaracharya maharaj including Deputy Chief minister.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense
G
O
 
H
O
M
E