[🇨🇳] Fresh crackdown, assassination of Chinese defense scientist. J20 designer removed and killed with many others.

[Krishna with Flute]

Date of Event: Mar 31, 2026

Source: https://www.PKDefense.com

J-20 fighter jet’s chief designer Yang Wei was found dead after removal.

J-20 chief designer Yang Wei was shot dead on the spot, not even sentenced, when the J-20 test flight exploded in front of Xi Jinping after the Iran war, India-Pakistan war and Venezuela debacle. &…

www.globaldefensecorp.com

After the miserable failure of Chinese weapons in Op Sindoor, taught n Iran and Venezuela, Chinese government is very angry with Chinese weapon designers, scientist and engineers. Their names are removed from website, they are removed from their position, they are made to disappear and found killed in mysterious circumstances. Reports here.

 

[Bilal9]

J-20 fighter jet’s chief designer Yang Wei was found dead after removal.

J-20 chief designer Yang Wei was shot dead on the spot, not even sentenced, when the J-20 test flight exploded in front of Xi Jinping after the Iran war, India-Pakistan war and Venezuela debacle. &…

www.globaldefensecorp.com

After the miserable failure of Chinese weapons in Op Sindoor, taught n Iran and Venezuela, Chinese government is very angry with Chinese weapon designers, scientist and engineers. Their names are removed from website, they are removed from their position, they are made to disappear and found killed in mysterious circumstances. Reports here.

My friend - what is the credibility of the link you posted for your BullSh*t story?

The link you posted (globaldefensecorp.com) uses strong Anti-China and anti-Russia tone

• Heavy editorial focus on:
  • Chinese military failures or corruption
  • Russian military weaknesses or setbacks
• Headlines often use loaded or adversarial language (e.g., “fail,” “killed,” “corruption”)

All defense sources have some bias.​

• Think tanks → reflect funding + policy worldview
• Defense media → tied to industry + access
• Governments → strategic messaging

The difference is transparency and rigor

That’s where Global Defense Corp falls short:

• You can’t tell who is speaking
• You can’t evaluate their expertise
• You can’t verify editorial standards

So - the bottom line is:

Be careful about the credibility of what you post.

• I suggest Defense News for reporting
• I suggest RAND Corporation or Center for Strategic and International Studies for deeper analysis
• We must treat Global Defense Corp as opinionated commentary with unclear credibility (i.e. not fit to be published in this forum)

This forum will not be used to frame BullSh*t masquerading as credible opinion. Next time you post this kind of "news" - it will be summarily deleted - you have been warned. You may not care about the credibility of this forum - but some of us here do, who care about the reputation of this site.

@Jiangnan.