Home Watch Videos Wars Login

[🇮🇳] China Admits HQ-9B/HQ-16 Air Defence Systems Not Capable to Intercept India's BrahMos Missiles, Fueling Acute Pakistani Frust

[🇮🇳] China Admits HQ-9B/HQ-16 Air Defence Systems Not Capable to Intercept India's BrahMos Missiles, Fueling Acute Pakistani Frust
More threads by Krishna with Flute

G   Indian Defense
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Haha (0)
Reactions: Mainerik
Have you guys actually shown any proof of hitting anything?
Doc you must be living under a roof.

Hundreds of debris pictures floating around on social media.

French agreeing, your CDS agreeing, most major defence publishments and OSINT handles agreeing.

Just take a dive, maybe on X.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Mainerik and Bilal9
The whole world has seen live video and satellite imagery of our hits on Pakistan bases and nuclear facilities.
Screenshot_20250606_113646_Chrome.webp


Nuclear facilities eh? First you have to make your own force"s chief believe that.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Obviously not, but right in the vicinity as a warning.
Oh so we are back at "shooting in the vicinity" and not shooting direct at Kirana hills and spreading radioactivity in Pakistan and future mongrel kids lmao? Like many Indians including doc was saying not a long ago.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Mainerik and Bilal9
Oh so we are back at "shooting in the vicinity" and not shooting direct at Kirana hills and spreading radioactivity in Pakistan and future mongrel kids lmao? Like many Indians including doc was saying not a long ago.
I personally never said that, but it could have also been the case.

Everything is conjecture and speculation so far.

Meri speculation is that they likely struck somewhere in the vicinity as a warning.

Doc is a legit guy wrt our army, man has sources and friendships in the fauj. Rest he can share if he'd like to.

So I wouldn't willy-nilly be dismissing people like that.

All evidence of Rafales and other planes and S-400s etc taken out is dodgy at best and outright fake otherwise.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
social media.

French agreeing, your CDS agreeing, most major defence publishments and OSINT handles agreeing.

Just take a dive, maybe on X.
Lol

You cannot friggin make this up.

@Lulldapull
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Bilal9

Members Online

No members online now.

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E