[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
786
30K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Bangladesh’s coal turn is a fresh bad sign for LNG exporters

REUTERS, Littleton

1790986662764.webp

Labourers unload coal from a cargo ship in Dhaka. Coal-fired electricity generation overtook gas-fired generation for the first time this summer in Bangladesh, data from Ember shows. Photo: AFP/FILE

Bangladesh should be one of the global LNG industry’s success stories, but instead it is a warning sign.

Few countries better fit the profile of a future liquefied natural gas growth market.

Electricity demand is rising, domestic gas reserves are falling, and policymakers have invested heavily in LNG import infrastructure to bridge the gap.

For years, those trends helped make Bangladesh a veritable poster child among LNG bulls who argued that rapidly growing Asian economies would underpin LNG demand growth for decades.

Instead, Bangladesh has crossed a milestone that should give LNG investors pause.

Coal-fired electricity generation overtook gas-fired generation for the first time this summer, data from Ember shows, marking a dramatic shift for a country where gas previously accounted for over 90 percent of electricity supplies.

Coal-fired electricity output was 3.92 terawatt hours (TWh) in July, compared to 3.66 TWh of generation from gas-fired plants.

That flip is significant because it has implications for gas use trends across the broader developing world.

COAL COMPETITION

The LNG industry’s growth story rests on a relatively small group of markets.

Demand in Europe is expected to flatten or decline over time as renewables expand.

Japan and South Korea remain major gas importers but both have more new nuclear power generation capacity under construction than gas-fired capacity, according to Global Energy Monitor (GEM), which should limit gas-fired growth.

China remains important, but its energy strategy is also mainly focused on developing domestic clean energy supplies and limiting fossil fuel import reliance.

That leaves emerging Asia, where countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam and the Philippines have long been viewed as the next generation of LNG buyers.

Those countries are expected to account for much of the growth needed to absorb the massive wave of LNG export capacity being built in the United States, Qatar and elsewhere.

The problem is that these countries are also among the world’s most price-sensitive energy consumers.

Bangladesh’s latest power mix data illustrates the challenge.

Despite expanding access to LNG imports, gas is losing market share to cheaper coal.

That is the opposite of what LNG bulls need to see.

ECONOMIC PAIN

The shift in Bangladesh’s power mix is primarily driven by costs.

Developing economies need reliable electricity, but it needs to be cheap and abundant enough to support industrial growth and expanding urban populations.

In many cases, those priorities outweigh concerns about emissions, and put LNG at a disadvantage.

Unlike domestic energy sources, LNG exposes buyers to global fuel markets.

And following the outbreak of Russia’s war with Ukraine in 2022 and the US and Israeli war with Iran in 2026, global gas buyers have received the painful message that gas imports can get very expensive.

Since the first US and Israeli strikes against Iran in late February, Asian LNG prices have surged from around $11 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) to over $25/MMBtu, dealing a stinging blow to cost-sensitive buyers, LSEG data shows.

Of course, coal carries its own risks, but remains substantially cheaper in Asia at the equivalent of around $6.50/MMBtu for supplies from Australia and nearer $5.00/MMBtu from Indonesia, according to LSEG.

And when governments are trying to keep electricity affordable, those considerations matter.

BROADER MESSAGE

What makes Bangladesh notable is that it appears to be part of a broader pattern.

Several Asian countries have registered steady declines in natural gas’s share of their generation mixes in recent years, including Pakistan and India, which were also viewed as high-potential LNG markets.

Even in Japan, one of the world’s largest LNG importers, gas’s share of the electricity mix has declined from over 40 percent in 2020 to around 28 percent so far this year, Ember data shows.

China is also registering declining gas intensity in power generation.

Despite becoming the world’s largest LNG importer, gas remains only a marginal contributor in China’s electricity production, accounting for around 3 percent of the generation mix so far in 2026. These declines in gas reliance for power generation in key Asian markets undermine arguments that rising electricity demand automatically triggers rising gas consumption.

Indeed, across much of Asia, gas is finding itself squeezed between rapidly growing renewable power and a coal sector that remains difficult to dislodge.

STAYING POWER

Much of the energy-transition debate was previously framed around the idea that gas would gradually displace coal in emerging markets, before being displaced itself by renewables and batteries.

But those discussions overlook the fact that many power operators across Asia remain in no rush to replace coal systems that they have spent decades building and remain cheap to operate.

As a result, every new LNG cargo must justify its cost against a fuel that many developing countries prefer on cost and reliability grounds.

The result is a challenging commercial reality for the LNG export sector.

While wealthy economies may value gas for its emissions advantages and flexibility, lower-income economies often place a higher premium on affordability.

That creates an uncomfortable mismatch between where LNG suppliers need demand growth and where LNG can most easily compete.

WARNING SIGNS

None of this means LNG demand is about to collapse.

Global gas consumption continues to grow in many markets, and new import infrastructure continues to be built.

But Bangladesh offers a valuable reminder that future demand is unlikely to be as automatic as some projections assume.

The world’s LNG industry is currently investing billions of dollars in new export capacity based on the assumption that developing economies will steadily increase gas consumption as their electricity systems expand.

Bangladesh’s experience highlights that gas use has the potential to follow a declining trajectory instead, and may lead LNG investors to ask how many other countries may follow similar paths.​
 

Experts suggest for long-term policy certainty
Prothom Alo English Desk

1791068887773.webp


A webinar titled “Bangladesh's Renewable Energy Transition: Closing the Gap to 2030, and the Economic Opportunity Ahead” was organised by the Dacca Institute of Research and Analytics (daira) on Friday to discuss Bangladesh’s renewable energy targets. Collected

A webinar titled “Bangladesh's Renewable Energy Transition: Closing the Gap to 2030, and the Economic Opportunity Ahead” was organised by the Dacca Institute of Research and Analytics (daira) on Friday to discuss Bangladesh’s renewable energy targets, the challenges of implementation, and the policy and infrastructure requirements for accelerating the country’s transition toward renewable energy, says a press release.

Speakers at the webinar highlighted the existing gap between Bangladesh’s renewable energy ambitions and its current capacity to deliver them.

The discussion focused on the need for grid modernisation, energy storage, reliable and accessible energy data, institutional coordination, private-sector investment, and long-term policy certainty.

Speakers also examined the economic and energy-security implications of Bangladesh’s continued dependence on imported fossil fuels.

The session began with a presentation of a policy brief by daira researcher Suborna Akther Laboni. The presentation highlighted that renewable energy currently accounts for approximately 2.3 per cent of Bangladesh’s grid electricity, while the government has set a target of achieving a 20 per cent renewable energy share by 2030.

The presentation noted that solar power costs approximately Tk 9.5 per unit, compared with around Tk 25 per unit for oil-fired generation, highlighting the economic potential of renewable energy.

The presentation further noted that only around 358 MW of renewable energy capacity was under construction as of February 2026, while approximately 760 MW would need to be added annually to remain on track toward the 2030 target.

Meeting the target would require an estimated US$933–980 million in annual investment through 2030. The presentation also highlighted the employment potential of rooftop solar, which generates approximately 26.6 jobs per MW, compared with around 2.1 jobs per MW for utility-scale solar.

The policy brief also examined the challenges surrounding Bangladesh’s electricity grid and renewable energy financing. It noted that a US$515 million World Bank grid programme was rated 'moderately unsatisfactory' in December 2024, having enabled approximately 0.04 GW of renewable energy capacity against a 0.15 GW target.

The presentation also discussed recent policy developments, including the cancellation of 31 renewable energy projects with a combined capacity of approximately 3,300 MW in September 2024, their reopening for review in April 2026, duty relief introduced in the FY2027 budget, and the rooftop solar incentive launched in September 2026.

Speaking on the institutional dimensions of Bangladesh’s energy transition, John Fluharty, Resident Programme Director at the International Republican Institute, emphasised the importance of transparency, accountability, and institutional trust.

He argued that a sustainable energy transition requires institutions capable of bringing different stakeholders into the decision-making process and ensuring clear oversight of public funds.

He stated, “The idea that transparency and accountability equals bureaucracy is just a bad way to look at it.”

He further emphasised that publishing information and establishing shared processes can strengthen trust and facilitate more effective decision-making.

Discussing the technical challenges facing Bangladesh’s electricity system, Mohammad Subail Bin Alam, COO of Rancon Infrastructures and Adjunct Faculty Member at the University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, stated, “We are not ready.”

He explained that Bangladesh’s existing grid was primarily designed around a limited number of large power plants and one-way electricity flows. The expansion of rooftop and distributed solar, he noted, would require two-way distribution networks, upgraded transformers, advanced monitoring systems such as SCADA, and greater battery-storage capacity.

He further argued that transmission, generation, and monitoring infrastructure must be planned together if Bangladesh is to add the volume of renewable capacity required to meet its targets.

Referring to the experience of Pakistan, he noted that rapid solar expansion without adequate storage and grid planning could create additional pressure on the electricity system.

He also called for policy certainty of at least five years, greater coordination among institutions including SREDA and the Bangladesh Power Development Board, and increased access to concessional financing.

Highlighting the importance of transparency and reliable information, Md Ismail Ali, Editor of The Daily Jatiyo Arthoniti, called for the establishment of a centralised and publicly accessible digital energy database.

He suggested that such a system should be updated regularly and enable policymakers, investors, researchers, and citizens to compare renewable energy targets, installed capacity, and actual electricity generation.

He also raised concerns about short-term policy incentives, arguing that investors require greater certainty when making investments in infrastructure with long operational lifespans.

According to him, renewable energy projects cannot be effectively financed when policy commitments remain limited to short periods.

The moderator, Sakib Bin Amin, Senior Research Fellow at daira and Professor of Economics at North South University, highlighted the importance of addressing inefficiencies across Bangladesh’s wider electricity system.

He noted that transmission and distribution losses of nearly 10 per cent, compared with approximately 2–3 per cent globally, indicate significant scope for improving system efficiency.

Amin proposed greater use of public-private partnerships, including build-operate-transfer models, alongside the establishment of a national energy data centre and an environmental quality council.

He also emphasised the importance of strengthening energy storage capacity, monitoring subsidies to ensure they reach their intended beneficiaries, and promoting energy efficiency and demand-side management to reduce pressure on imported fuel.

The discussion also highlighted the importance of establishing a predictable policy environment for renewable energy investment.

Speakers emphasised that frequent changes in incentives, unclear institutional responsibilities, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to affordable financing could undermine Bangladesh’s ability to translate renewable energy targets into actual projects.

Concluding the discussion, Sakib Bin Amin emphasised that Bangladesh’s challenge is increasingly one of implementation rather than target-setting.

He stated, “We need to connect policy with projects, projects with finance, finance with infrastructure, and generation with a grid capable of absorbing and delivering that electricity reliably.”

The webinar brought together representatives from academia, the private sector, media, research, and policy institutions to discuss the opportunities and challenges surrounding Bangladesh’s renewable energy transition.

The discussion formed part of daira’s broader engagement on sustainable development, economic policy, energy security, and emerging policy challenges in Bangladesh.​
 

Latest Posts

Back