โ˜• Buy Us a Coffee to Support Us โ˜• Support
[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ] - How Muslims are doing in India? | Page 2 | PKDefense - Home

[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ] How Muslims are doing in India?

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G   Indian Defense
[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ] How Muslims are doing in India?
50
1K
More threads by Saif


India's parliament passes bill that would change Muslim land endowments
Published :
Apr 04, 2025 10:36
Updated :
Apr 04, 2025 10:36

1743836245956.png


India's parliament passed a controversial bill moved by Prime Minister Narendra Modiโ€™s Hindu nationalist government to amend laws governing Muslim land endowments while Muslim groups and opposition parties protested the move.

The bill would add non-Muslims to boards that manage waqf land endowments and give the government a larger role in validating their land holdings. The government says the changes will help to fight corruption and mismanagement while promoting diversity, but critics fear that it will further undermine the rights of the countryโ€™s Muslim minority and could be used to confiscate historic mosques and other property.

The debate was heated in both houses of parliament. The Lower House debated it Wednesday through early Thursday while in the Upper House, the fiery discussion lasted more than 16 hours into early Friday.

The Congress-led opposition firmly opposed the proposal, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory against Muslims. Modiโ€™s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party lacks a majority in the Lower House, but its allies helped to pass the bill.

In the Lower House, 288 members voted for the bill while 232 were against it. Similarly, 128 favored it and 95 voted against it in the Upper House. The bill will now be sent to President Droupadi Murmu for her assent to become law.

Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the bill to change a 1995 law that set rules for the foundations and set up state-level boards to administer them.

Many Muslim groups as well as the opposition parties say the proposal is discriminatory, politically motivated and an attempt by Modiโ€™s ruling party to weaken minority rights.

The bill was first introduced in parliament last year, and opposition leaders have said some of their subsequent proposals on it were ignored. The government has said opposition parties are using rumors to discredit them and block transparency in managing the endowments.

Whatโ€™s a waqf?

Waqfs are a traditional type of Islamic charitable foundation in which a donor permanently sets aside property โ€” often but not always real estate โ€” for religious or charitable purposes. Waqf properties cannot be sold or transferred.

Waqfs in India control 872,000 properties that cover 405,000 hectares (1 million acres) of land, worth an estimated $14.22 billion. Some of these endowments date back centuries, and many are used for mosques, seminaries, graveyards and orphanages.

Law would change who runs waqfs

In India, waqf property is managed by semi-official boards, one for each state and federally run union territory. The law would require non-Muslims to be appointed to the boards.

Currently, waqf boards are staffed by Muslims, like similar bodies that help administer other religious charities.

During the parliamentary debate, Home Minister Amit Shah said non-Muslims would be included in waqf boards only for administration purposes and helping run the endowments smoothly. He added that they were not there to interfere in religious affairs.

โ€œThe (non-Muslim) members will monitor whether the administration is running as per law or not, and whether the donations are being used for what they were intended or not,โ€ he said.

Muslim groups, like The All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said such comments were against the fundamentals of Islamic endowments as such bodies necessarily need to be governed by Muslims only. The board said the bill was โ€œa blatant infringement on the constitutional rights of Muslim citizensโ€ and called on citizens to hit the streets against it.

Mallikarjun Kharge, the Congress president, said why should waqf bodies allow non-Muslims as members when Hindu temple trusts donโ€™t allow people of other religions in their fold.

One of the most controversial changes is to ownership rules, which could impact historical mosques, shrines and graveyards since many such properties lack formal documentation as they were donated without legal records decades, and even centuries, ago.

Questions about title

Other changes could impact mosques on land held in centuries-old waqfs.

Radical Hindu groups have laid claim to several mosques around India, arguing they are built on the ruins of important Hindu temples. Many such cases are pending in courts.

The law would require waqf boards to seek approval from a district level officer to confirm the waqfsโ€™ claims to property.

Critics say that would undermine the board and could lead to Muslims being stripped of their land. Itโ€™s not clear how often the boards would be asked to confirm such claims to land.

โ€œThe Waqf (Amendment) Bill is a weapon aimed at marginalising Muslims and usurping their personal laws and property rights,โ€ Rahul Gandhi, the main opposition leader, wrote on social media platform X. He said the bill was an โ€œattack on the Constitutionโ€ by the BJP and its allies โ€œaimed at Muslims today but sets a precedent to target other communities in the future.โ€

Fears among Muslims

While many Muslims agree that waqfs suffer from corruption, encroachments and poor management, they also fear that the new law could give Indiaโ€™s Hindu nationalist government far greater control over Muslim properties, particularly at a time when attacks against minority communities have become more aggressive under Modi, with Muslims often targeted for everything from their food and clothing styles to inter-religious marriages.

Last month, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said in its annual report that religious freedom conditions in India continued to deteriorate while Modi and his party โ€œpropagated hateful rhetoric and disinformation against Muslims and other religious minoritiesโ€ during last yearโ€™s election campaign.

Modiโ€™s government says India is run on democratic principles of equality and no discrimination exists in the country.

Muslims, who are 14% of Indiaโ€™s 1.4 billion population, are the largest minority group in the Hindu-majority nation but they are also the poorest, a 2013 government survey found.​
 

India's parliament passes bill that would change Muslim land endowments
Published :
Apr 04, 2025 10:36
Updated :
Apr 04, 2025 10:36

View attachment 16246

India's parliament passed a controversial bill moved by Prime Minister Narendra Modiโ€™s Hindu nationalist government to amend laws governing Muslim land endowments while Muslim groups and opposition parties protested the move.

The bill would add non-Muslims to boards that manage waqf land endowments and give the government a larger role in validating their land holdings. The government says the changes will help to fight corruption and mismanagement while promoting diversity, but critics fear that it will further undermine the rights of the countryโ€™s Muslim minority and could be used to confiscate historic mosques and other property.

The debate was heated in both houses of parliament. The Lower House debated it Wednesday through early Thursday while in the Upper House, the fiery discussion lasted more than 16 hours into early Friday.

The Congress-led opposition firmly opposed the proposal, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory against Muslims. Modiโ€™s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party lacks a majority in the Lower House, but its allies helped to pass the bill.

In the Lower House, 288 members voted for the bill while 232 were against it. Similarly, 128 favored it and 95 voted against it in the Upper House. The bill will now be sent to President Droupadi Murmu for her assent to become law.

Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the bill to change a 1995 law that set rules for the foundations and set up state-level boards to administer them.

Many Muslim groups as well as the opposition parties say the proposal is discriminatory, politically motivated and an attempt by Modiโ€™s ruling party to weaken minority rights.

The bill was first introduced in parliament last year, and opposition leaders have said some of their subsequent proposals on it were ignored. The government has said opposition parties are using rumors to discredit them and block transparency in managing the endowments.

Whatโ€™s a waqf?

Waqfs are a traditional type of Islamic charitable foundation in which a donor permanently sets aside property โ€” often but not always real estate โ€” for religious or charitable purposes. Waqf properties cannot be sold or transferred.

Waqfs in India control 872,000 properties that cover 405,000 hectares (1 million acres) of land, worth an estimated $14.22 billion. Some of these endowments date back centuries, and many are used for mosques, seminaries, graveyards and orphanages.

Law would change who runs waqfs

In India, waqf property is managed by semi-official boards, one for each state and federally run union territory. The law would require non-Muslims to be appointed to the boards.

Currently, waqf boards are staffed by Muslims, like similar bodies that help administer other religious charities.

During the parliamentary debate, Home Minister Amit Shah said non-Muslims would be included in waqf boards only for administration purposes and helping run the endowments smoothly. He added that they were not there to interfere in religious affairs.

โ€œThe (non-Muslim) members will monitor whether the administration is running as per law or not, and whether the donations are being used for what they were intended or not,โ€ he said.

Muslim groups, like The All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said such comments were against the fundamentals of Islamic endowments as such bodies necessarily need to be governed by Muslims only. The board said the bill was โ€œa blatant infringement on the constitutional rights of Muslim citizensโ€ and called on citizens to hit the streets against it.

Mallikarjun Kharge, the Congress president, said why should waqf bodies allow non-Muslims as members when Hindu temple trusts donโ€™t allow people of other religions in their fold.

One of the most controversial changes is to ownership rules, which could impact historical mosques, shrines and graveyards since many such properties lack formal documentation as they were donated without legal records decades, and even centuries, ago.

Questions about title

Other changes could impact mosques on land held in centuries-old waqfs.

Radical Hindu groups have laid claim to several mosques around India, arguing they are built on the ruins of important Hindu temples. Many such cases are pending in courts.

The law would require waqf boards to seek approval from a district level officer to confirm the waqfsโ€™ claims to property.

Critics say that would undermine the board and could lead to Muslims being stripped of their land. Itโ€™s not clear how often the boards would be asked to confirm such claims to land.

โ€œThe Waqf (Amendment) Bill is a weapon aimed at marginalising Muslims and usurping their personal laws and property rights,โ€ Rahul Gandhi, the main opposition leader, wrote on social media platform X. He said the bill was an โ€œattack on the Constitutionโ€ by the BJP and its allies โ€œaimed at Muslims today but sets a precedent to target other communities in the future.โ€

Fears among Muslims

While many Muslims agree that waqfs suffer from corruption, encroachments and poor management, they also fear that the new law could give Indiaโ€™s Hindu nationalist government far greater control over Muslim properties, particularly at a time when attacks against minority communities have become more aggressive under Modi, with Muslims often targeted for everything from their food and clothing styles to inter-religious marriages.

Last month, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said in its annual report that religious freedom conditions in India continued to deteriorate while Modi and his party โ€œpropagated hateful rhetoric and disinformation against Muslims and other religious minoritiesโ€ during last yearโ€™s election campaign.

Modiโ€™s government says India is run on democratic principles of equality and no discrimination exists in the country.

Muslims, who are 14% of Indiaโ€™s 1.4 billion population, are the largest minority group in the Hindu-majority nation but they are also the poorest, a 2013 government survey found.​

A great thing which Indian government did. Waqf mafia checked.
 
450 hate speeches against Muslims by BJP leaders out of which 63 are delivered by Modi as per report. I ask everyone to report only one of those 63 speeches here.

It is true that hate for Muslims are growing in India. However, this is partly true. The complete truth is that hate for Muslims is growing across the world including India and other Muslim nations. They believe that they can openly shout slogans like "Gustakh e Rasul ki ek hi saja sar tan se juda", they may do Namaz on road, they can insult Hindu gods, they can demand all right without any responsibility, they can get all benefits without contributing anything to nation and play victim card. Whole world is fed up with them. Jaisa Nabi vaise hi unke manne wale. Jahil, Gunde, Baiman. Inspite of giving two separate nation and lots of land, they remained here. They didn't go to Pakistan. Time to deal with them ruthlessly.
Great sentiments on a weekend. Tabiat thik thak?
 
Not the books but Jihadi Literature. One way, any Islamic literature is Jihadi and hateful but what police have captured may be more provocating aimed to incite violence.
If you call the writings of Abul A'la Maududi "Jihadi literature" than may Ma Saraswati help you. He was a modernizer of Islamic thought and an Islamic revivalist. Which is the opposite of jihadist philosophy.

"He also learned English and German to study, intensively, Western philosophy, sociology, and history for full five years: he eventually came up to the conclusion that "ulama' in the past did not endeavor to discover the causes of Europe's rise, and he offered a long list of philosophers whose scholarship had made Europe a world power: Fichte, Hegel, Comte, Mill, Turgot, Adam Smith, Malthus, Rousseau, Voltaire, Montesquieu, Darwin, Goethe, and Herder, among others. Comparing their contribution to that of Muslims, he concluded that the latter did not reach even 1 percent."


I mean - criticizing people is fine, but at least be accurate. Not all Muslims are mad propagators of Jihadist philosophy.

However - I do understand that today's incumbent BJP and RSS administration in India does not like his writings (characterizes them as extremist) and even forced Aligarh Muslim University recently to drop his writings from the syllabus. So be it.

 
Last edited:

BNP wants India to reconsider Waqf law to uphold communal harmony
FE Online Desk
Published :
Apr 06, 2025 18:29
Updated :
Apr 06, 2025 18:29

1743987411844.png


BNP on Sunday expressed optimism that the recently passed controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 in Indiaโ€™s Lok Sabha would be reconsidered in the interest of maintaining regional communal harmony.

"India is a large democratic country and the Indian government will reconsider this law, upholding the guardianship role of the state in protecting the religious rights of citizens of all religions... We express this hope,โ€ said BNP Standing Committee member Salahuddin Ahmed at a press conference at the BNP chairpersonโ€™s Gulshan office, UNB reports.

Salahuddin said, โ€œWe believe that this step (to reconsider this law) will play a historic role in maintaining regional communal harmony."

He said the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and other like-minded organisations have termed the new law contradictory to the core spirit of the Islamic Waqf system.

According to the organisations, the Waqf Boards should be managed only by Muslims.

โ€œThey (the organisations) view this law as a direct interference in the religious rights of Muslim citizens,โ€ he added.

The bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday by a vote of 288-232. Later on Friday, the bill was cleared by a vote of 128-95. Indian President Droupadi Murmu has already given her assent to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025.

Referring to the ancient Islamic endowment system of Waqf in India, Salahuddin said they analysed various provisions of this law and found that it attempts to curtail the rights of Indiaโ€™s minority Muslims and discriminate against them.

He said Muslims in India and various Muslim organisations have reacted by saying that the 'Muslim Waqf (Amendment) Bill-2024' is unconstitutional and politically motivated.

The BNP leader expressed concern that the law, which goes against the traditions, rights, and interests of some 20 crore Muslims โ€” about 14 per cent of Indiaโ€™s population โ€” creates ample scope for misuse. It could lead to disastrous consequences in the management of Islamic religious institutions, he said.

He said some 10 lakh acres of Waqf property under Waqf Boards in India and most of the lands are used for public welfare purposes such as mosques, madrasas, graveyards, and orphanages. The inclusion of non-Muslim members in the governing boards under the new law has sparked controversy and could infringe upon the constitutional rights of Muslim citizens, he added.

"We (BNP) believe that it is not appropriate to take any such step at the state level, as it may lead to the fear of destroying communal harmony due to interference in the religious rights of Muslims and discriminatory behaviour,โ€ said Salahuddin.

He also said that giving non-Muslims authority over the administration and management of these religious properties is tantamount to direct interference in the religious rights of Muslim citizens.

BNP Chairpersonโ€™s advisory council member Ismail Zabihullah and its law affairs secretary Barrister Kaiser Kamal were also present at the press conference.​
 
If you call the writings of Abul A'la Maududi "Jihadi literature" than may Ma Saraswati help you. He was a modernizer of Islamic thought and an Islamic revivalist. Which is the opposite of jihadist philosophy.

"He also learned English and German to study, intensively, Western philosophy, sociology, and history for full five years: he eventually came up to the conclusion that "ulama' in the past did not endeavor to discover the causes of Europe's rise, and he offered a long list of philosophers whose scholarship had made Europe a world power: Fichte, Hegel, Comte, Mill, Turgot, Adam Smith, Malthus, Rousseau, Voltaire, Montesquieu, Darwin, Goethe, and Herder, among others. Comparing their contribution to that of Muslims, he concluded that the latter did not reach even 1 percent."


I mean - criticizing people is fine, but at least be accurate. Not all Muslims are mad propagators of Jihadist philosophy.

However - I do understand that today's incumbent BJP and RSS administration in India does not like his writings (characterizes them as extremist) and even forced Aligarh Muslim University recently to drop his writings from the syllabus. So be it.


No matter what Islamic literature it is. It promotes ignorance and radicalism including Quran. Islam Jahil kabilo se nikali hui ideology hai. Mohammad sex maniac tha. You can't expect anything batter where Islam is practiced in any form. Best way is to ditch Islam and Islamic practices. This is the reason that wherever Islam is practiced, people are jahil. Where it is practiced more people are more jahil. For example Indian Muslims. Where people practice it just for the sake of saying, they are batter. For example Iram, Indonesia. BD under Hasina had done very well and I was a big admirer of BD' economic policies. Now see what is happening. BD's suppl chains are getting disrupt. BD, which was a big possibility is losing its shine under idiot yusuf.
 
Guys let's not mention religious personalities, whether fictitious or real, because this will make the thread turn into a mud-slinging crap-fest. Krishan Dada, let's not make incendiary comments on prophets who are revered by Muslims. This makes things controversial.

While I understand your personal feelings on this, let's not go into controversial characterizations.
 
If Mohammad (PBUH) was a sex maniac, your Shiv was a super sex maniac with so many wives. You guys still worship his penis which confirms how big sex maniac Shiv was. Peace.

Shiva has only one wife not many. Shiva is not any physical being but the external self existing power who along with shakti created this universe. People worship Shiva by giving shapeless, external power. Moreover, in the sex maniac Islamist literature Penis and vegina are just organ to fulfill lust. In Hinduism, they are considered sacred organs of creation without which the whole world will collapse. This is the basic difference between 2 thinking and why 1.8 bn Muslims have nothing to show as contribution to modern world.
 

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts