Home Watch Videos Wars Login

[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy

[🇧🇩] Monitoring Bangladesh's Economy
955
25K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense
You have no clue. Most of the excessive spending was to prop up the chori and looting by Awami idiots.

However the infra did improve, and is on par with your country (some would say better in terms of road infra).

Ohhh is it? Our Delhi Bombay highway costs us over Rs.one lakh crore. Our bullet train cost us INR one lakh sixty thousand crore. What is your total infra budget by the way.

Secondly, it is not about corruption but about priority. Your country decided to deduct these deficit out of planned. Expenditure rather than from military budget or unplanned expenditure.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Waning foreign investment a wake-up call for policymakers

1737848659729.webp


The inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) into Bangladesh is facing critical challenges as a plethora of factors have caused it to stagnate to a mere 0.5 percent of the country's gross domestic product in recent years.

In the July-September quarter of FY25, the South Asian country received 71 percent less foreign investment year-on-year, down from $360.5 million in the July-September period of FY24, according to Bangladesh Bank data.

Even more concerning is the fact that a recent report by the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA), styled 'The FDI Heatmap', emphasised the significant lack of structured investment promotion campaigns for domestic industries.

According to the report, only 45 percent of all foreign investments in Bangladesh qualify as actual FDI. The majority consists of intercompany loans or reinvestments.

This is an alarming development, especially as economists have cited the need to increase the amount of foreign investment in order to create jobs, spur business activities and put the economy back on track for years now.

This raises the question of why FDI has continued on a downward trend despite numerous authorities advocating measures to enhance inflows.

Experts identified several barriers, including political instability, economic uncertainty, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and inconsistent policies.

They also pointed to high inflation, currency volatility, and inter-agency misalignment, which collectively undermine investor confidence and hinder economic growth.

Bangladesh's political landscape took a tense turn in mid-2024 when monthslong protests against the then Awami League government culminated in a mass uprising that saw its ouster.

This shift disrupted the economy and created doubts about stability and governance -- key factors in attracting FDI.

The political unrest was further compounded by a deteriorating law-and-order situation, leaving investors in a "wait-and-see" mode.

Additionally, economic problems, including rising prices, an unstable local currency, and a lack of US dollars, continue to make it harder for foreigners to invest. Policy inconsistency is another major concern.

"Bangladesh is grappling with fundamental economic issues that significantly deter investment decisions," observed M Masrur Reaz, chairman of Policy Exchange Bangladesh.

According to him, restoring macroeconomic stability is essential for meaningful improvement in FDI inflow.

Over the last 15 years, corruption extended beyond bribery, hitting new heights, including manipulation during policy formulation, Reaz observed, adding that this rise in corruption significantly discouraged FDI.

Economic experts also point to deep-rooted problems such as structural inefficiencies, external shocks and policy gaps, which come about as there is a lack of coordination between regulatory bodies such as Bangladesh Bank, the National Board of Revenue, and ministries.

"Policy inconsistencies and bureaucratic hurdles significantly amplify investment risks," noted Rupali Chowdhury, a former FICCI president. She urged the government to ensure alignment among institutional policies to regain investor trust.

Professor Selim Raihan, executive director of the South Asian Network on Economic Modeling, characterised the current investment climate as hostile to FDI due to policy uncertainty.

He noted that frequent ad-hoc changes to policies, particularly those related to import duties and taxes, deter both existing and potential investors.

"There are lucrative policies on paper, but a lack of implementation undermines their effectiveness," Raihan added. He emphasised that macroeconomic stability and consistent policies are essential for any significant improvement in FDI inflow.

Raihan also highlighted that FDI inflows are often seen as an indicator of economic health.

Al Mamun Mridha, joint secretary general of the Bangladesh China Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said the prevailing unstable political situation is the primary reason for the decline in FDI.

He added that rising interest rates and the shortage of gas supplies to industries was another deterrent. "Investors monitor everything before making an investment. So, in this moment of crisis, no one will feel interested in investing here."

He also pointed out that the cost of doing business in Bangladesh is higher than in many other countries, despite relatively low labor costs, discouraging FDI.

Zaved Akhtar, president of the Foreign Investors' Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said earlier that political stability is paramount for any form of investment, adding that a lack thereof had created a palpable sense of hesitation among foreign investors.

Without stability, foreign investors hesitate due to risks like currency depreciation, sudden regulatory shifts, and an unstable business environment.

Ultimately, if political and economic uncertainties are not addressed quickly, Bangladesh may lose its competitive advantage in attracting global investment. This could harm the country's long-term economic goals and growth.

However, the recent decline in FDI should not be swept under the cloud of political uncertainty. It should serve as a wake-up call for policymakers.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Next budget to focus more on revenue
Shakhawat Hossain 25 January, 2025, 23:24

1737849257673.webp


Economists want curb on corruption in NBR

Revenue generation will continue to get priority in the next budget as the interim government wants to pull up the country’s falling tax-GDP ratio.

Finance ministry officials said that they had focused on half a dozen areas to increase the revenue generation in the coming financial year of 2025–26 beginning from July 2025.

Rationalisation of income tax waivers will get top focus along with imposing 15 per cent Value Added Tax on most of the consumer goods, they said referring to the proposed revenue mobilisation target at Tk 5.5 lakh crore in FY2025–26.

Economists said that the finance adviser should also come up with specific proposals to curb revenue leakages and corruption by the tax officials which, according to them, significantly contributes to the falling tax-GDP ratio.

The National Board of Revenue in a report released in December 2024 has calculated that Tk 1,15,056 crore was exempted in direct taxes during FY2021–22, almost 2.9 per cent of the GDP in that financial year.

Of that exempted amount, Tk 71,394 crore or more than 60 per cent is linked to the exemption of corporate income tax.

The overall amount of revenue losses due to exemptions reached over Tk 1,50,000 crore in the past FY2023–24, said the finance ministry officials.

The interim government like the ousted Awami League regime is committed to the International Monetary Fund to reduce the tax exemption under the on-going $4.7 billion loan programme.

Tax exemption has been identified as a major reason for the country’s tax-GDP ratio falling over the last ten years with it dropping below 8 per cent in FY2023–24 from 9 per cent in 2013–14.

The low revenue has been a persistent headache for the successive governments, said Mustafa K Mujeri, executive director of the Institute for Inclusive Finance and Development.

Resource crunch has constrained the government’s ability to allocate adequate fund for social protection amid high inflation prevailing persisting over the past three years, he said, adding that public expenditures on health and education were decreasing.

Revenue shortages also forced the government to rely on borrowing sending public debt to an unsustainable level, according to the ‘Medium-term macroeconomic policy statement from 2024–25 to 2026–27’ report by the finance division.

Economists said that revenue mobilisation measures were taken in the past also but failed to bring much results due to corruption by the tax officials and revenue leakages.

Unless the interim government could effectively curb corruption, there is no guarantee that the proposed tax measures would pay, said former World Bank Dhaka office chief economist Zahid Hussain.

He suggested automation of revenue collection as a step to check corruption helping generate more revenues.

The recently prepared ‘White Paper on the state of the Bangladesh economy’ calls the revenue board’s automation measures half-hearted and says that the half-baked steps are a major barrier to effective revenue generation, deepening inefficiencies and fostering a climate of non-compliance.

One of the most glaring examples in this regard is the lack of integration between the NBR and other relevant government agencies that severely limits the effectiveness of the taxation system, continues the White Paper prepared by the interim government to review the state of the economy for the period of 2009–2024, the tenure of the now ousted Awami League government.

The paper also identifies corruption and weak governance undermining tax revenue, stalling reform and service delivery.

Low tax revenue in the country is driven by weak governance, widespread corruption and a lack of trust in how tax revenue is used. Corruption, particularly in tax administration, has led to widespread tax evasion and poor compliance, adds the White Paper.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Inflation can be reduced to 6-7pc in next fiscal, says economist Zahid
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha . Dhaka 25 January, 2025, 23:25

1737849519534.webp

Zahid Hussain

Zahid Hussain, a prominent figure and former lead economist at the World Bank’s Dhaka office, has expressed optimism that the general point-to-point inflation rate could be reduced to between 6 to 7 per cent in the next fiscal year (FY26) if the country does not face natural or political calamities.

‘My projection is that it will be possible to bring down inflation within 6 to 7 per cent if there is no major disruption. Prices of several commodities are still increasing. The prices of essential items like rice, lentils, and fish, which significantly impact the common people, need to be reduced,’ he stated.

The esteemed economist shared these insights during an interview with BSS at his residence in the capital. It is noteworthy that the general point-to-point inflation rate in Bangladesh slightly eased in December, reaching 10.89 per cent, down from 11.38 per cent in November 2024.

Data from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) indicated that this decline was driven by a fall in both food and non-food inflation. In 2024, point-to-point food inflation decreased to 12.92 per cent in December, from 13.80 per cent in November, according to BBS data.

Similarly, non-food inflation also saw a slight decline, reaching 9.26 per cent in December, down from 9.39 per cent in November 2024.

When asked about the possibility of general point-to-point inflation falling below double digits in the coming days, Zahid stated that while one can hope, it is not something to be counted on.

Regarding GDP growth for the current fiscal year (FY25), he commented, ‘If 4 per cent growth is attained by the end, compared to 1.81 per cent in the first quarter, then I would consider it a good achievement given the current circumstances.’

He further elaborated, ‘My projection is that if we can move towards stability in the next fiscal year (FY26), then we could reach a new normal by mid-2026, coinciding with the completion of the election process.’

Zahid emphasized that if this new normal materializes, stakeholders and investors would not wait until June 2026. ‘Should they perceive that everything is heading in the right direction, they would begin preparations to capitalise on moving early,’ he added.

He added that if everything proceeds as planned, the country might witness a significant turnaround in investment by the end of this year. ‘A GDP growth rate of 4.5 to 5 per cent in the next fiscal year (FY26) will then be attainable. Subsequently, we can work towards surpassing a 5 per cent GDP growth rate and gradually emerge from the middle-income trap.’

When asked about the state of the banking sector, he remarked that, unlike the previous regime, the central bank’s policies are now being implemented effectively. ‘We now see much more proactivity and consistency from the central bank,’ he noted.

Although the central bank has printed money to provide some liquidity support, he mentioned that they did not follow their predecessors’ approach to financing the budget. The interest rate caps, both visible and invisible, no longer exist, and the exchange rate has remained stable despite some instability last December.

The eminent economist highlighted that the central bank is making efforts to make the exchange rate more market-based. Banks are now required to send the exact buying and selling rates of foreign currencies twice a day. ‘In this regard, efforts from the central bank are evident,’ he said.

He added that from late 2021 to early 2024, there was a significant drop in foreign currency reserves, declining by at least $1 billion on average each month. However, that trend has now ceased.

‘There has been some stability in foreign currency reserves, and the central bank is currently not selling dollars. However, with a gross reserve of $20 billion, this amount is not substantial enough to withstand large-scale political or natural disasters, such as hikes in import costs or declines in export earnings,’ he explained.

He added, ‘We do not have sufficient buffers and need to further enhance the reserve.’

Noting the encouraging inflow of inward remittances, he highlighted that this improvement is not due to a sudden rise in expatriate wages or a decrease in their cost of living but is primarily a result of a decline in illicit financial outflows.

Zahid mentioned that it is now difficult to launder money abroad as it was in the past, with many who previously laundered money now in hiding. ‘You can’t guarantee where this trend will go in the future or whether it will revert,’ he said.

In the past, remittance inflows of $1.30 billion to $1.40 billion per month were considered ‘bad performance,’ while $1.70 billion or above was seen as ‘good performance.’ However, the benchmark has shifted, with $2 billion per month now considered the new normal.

‘If we can maintain a remittance inflow of $2.20 billion or more on average per month, coupled with the growing number of outbound expatriates, we can term this trend of ‘turnaround’ as sustainable,’ he concluded.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Ohhh is it? Our Delhi Bombay highway costs us over Rs.one lakh crore. Our bullet train cost us INR one lakh sixty thousand crore. What is your total infra budget by the way.

Secondly, it is not about corruption but about priority. Your country decided to deduct these deficit out of planned. Expenditure rather than from military budget or unplanned expenditure.

Just one 6.15 KM bridge through a major river cost Tk. 30,000 crore.


The 52 KM six-lane controlled-access connector expressway from Dhaka to Bhanga near the bridge is called the Dhaka–Bhanga Expressway (aka N8). It is about 52 KM long and cost 11,000 crore to construct. So about 211 crore per KM.
1737873318773.png


1737873865183.png


1737873920426.png


The Delhi Mumbai expressway is 1250 KM long - of course the cost will be high (around 80 crore per KM). But still not as high as that of Bangladesh - about one third as costly.

Per KM, roads in Bangladesh cost way higher than India. Of course graft is a small part of it, but generally the standards are higher in Bangladesh (in this case Chinese road construction standards). Indian vloggers repeatedly post this on their VLOGs when they visit.

You don't build highways or railway tracks every day - better to build them right and not repair them every year.
 
Last edited:
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
  • Like (+1)
Reactions: Krishna with Flute

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E