Home Watch Videos Wars Movies Login

[🇺🇸] Are the US martials civilian or paramilitary?

[🇺🇸] Are the US martials civilian or paramilitary?
11
2K
More threads by ThunderCat

G   American Defense

ThunderCat

Pakistan Military Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
441
Likes
226
Nation

Residence

The US marshals are a federal fighting force responsible for handling federal fugitives and prisons. They assist in catching federal criminals as well as protect judges/witnesses. My question is, would this group be considered civilian or paramilitary?

A picture of US Marshals:


USMS-Marshal-Ransom.jpg
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
The US marshals are a federal fighting force responsible for handling federal fugitives and prisons. They assist in catching federal criminals as well as protect judges/witnesses. My question is, would this group be considered civilian or paramilitary?

A picture of US Marshals:
US marshalls have the same official status as any Federal law enforcement agencies. Para-military has no legal basis in the US and government doesn't do that. Paramilitary in the US are private and they are not legally protected.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
US marshalls have the same official status as any Federal law enforcement agencies. Para-military has no legal basis in the US and government doesn't do that. Paramilitary in the US are private and they are not legally protected.

How about in non-legal terms. Would they match the definition of a paramilitary force?
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
How about in non-legal terms. Would they match the definition of a paramilitary force?
In US law, para- military defined as private militia which goes back to the pre-independence era. US military has no law enforcement mandate such as in Pakistan. Now, if you want to compare the equipment and training, LEO officers get similar as the US military.

In short, it is strictly defined by law what is a para- military. You can not use Pakistani analogy in the US. That will be illegal.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
In US law, para- military defined as private militia which goes back to the pre-independence era. US military has no law enforcement mandate such as in Pakistan. Now, if you want to compare the equipment and training, LEO officers get similar as the US military.

In short, it is strictly defined by law what is a para- military. You can not use Pakistani analogy in the US. That will be illegal.

Yes as I thought USA might not have a formally designated legal paramilitary force. But i'm guessing since marshals don't fall under the formal military definition and are employed for handling dangerous situations and not for legal investigations, they would not fit the category of civilians like police officers would but rather under another universal definition which I guessed would be paramilitary.

But then if America does not have a legal definition for a civic state agency to be labeled paramilitary, they'd fall under the international definition.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
Yes as I thought USA might not have a formally designated legal paramilitary force. But i'm guessing since marshals don't fall under the formal military definition and are employed for handling dangerous situations and not for legal investigations, they would not fit the category of civilians like police officers would but rather under another universal definition which I guessed would be paramilitary.

But then if America does not have a legal definition for a civic state agency to be labeled paramilitary, they'd fall under the international definition.
Every International definition doesn't apply to the US as even Florida local national guards operates F15 fighter jets. Us law doesn't recognize International jurisdiction fro example. When you use a common term without taking the country specifics, your content will become flawed. It is one for general public and another for defense affairs. If you want to give credibility to your content, you must follow the correct defense protocols.
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
  • Wow (+2)
Reactions: ThunderCat
Every International definition doesn't apply to the US as even Florida local national guards operates F15 fighter jets. Us law doesn't recognize International jurisdiction fro example. When you use a common term without taking the country specifics, your content will become flawed. It is one for general public and another for defense affairs. If you want to give credibility to your content, you must follow the correct defense protocols.

Ok that's something I didn't know. I didn't mean legal definition. I meant as in universal definition. For example some countries might not have a legal definition of white race; however the typical universal definition of a white person is a person of Caucasoid skull type plus white skin, typically one of European descent.

Most countries might not have a legal criteria for race. But a sort of universal definition definitely exists.
 
Last edited:
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond
@Old School I just checked out some portions of books online. They define the marshals as paramilitary. It seems they fall under the universal definition of paramilitary.

But as you pointed out a legal paramilitary might not exist in the legal books of law enforcement of America.
 
Last edited:
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E