[🇵🇰] Five reasons why socialism is not discussed in Pakistan

G Pakistan Affairs
[🇵🇰] Five reasons why socialism is not discussed in Pakistan
16
1K
More threads by Old School

Old School

Senior Moderator
Moderator
Jan 26, 2024
1,774
1,019
Origin

Residence

Axis Group

[H1]Five reasons why socialism is not discussed in Pakistan[/H1]
Why, with all its merits that seem to answer our problems, is there a lack of interest in socialism in Pakistan?
After years of abandonment following the demise of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall, socialism is generating academic and political interest again. The financial crash of 2007-08 only added fuel to the fire, as critics of capitalism pointed towards the inherent tendency of the system to collapse. The left-wing tilt of Latin America, since the start of the century, along with the victory of Syriza in Greece in the not too distant past, has only encouraged further debate on the merits of socialist thought.

Interest in socialism and the Marxist worldview has a long history in Pakistani politics. While it can safely be argued that Pakistan has never turned into, or come close to turning into a socialist society, there have been times in the past where this particular school of thought generated lively debate within political circles. As things stand currently however, interest in socialism in Pakistan is limited with only a handful of political entities with no substantial electoral muscle.

This leads to the natural question: Why, with all its merits that seem to answer so many of our problems, is there a disappointing lack of mainstream interest in socialism within the web of Pakistani politics?

The answer to this can include numerous explanations, and the purpose here is not to paint a simplistic picture of an otherwise complex situation. The purpose here is to only highlight some portions, perhaps the five most obvious ones:

1. Academic bias

The material taught in academic institutions of the country is tilted heavily in favour of the neo-liberal school of thought, where it is argued that merits of the free market far outnumber those of other alternatives. Pakistan Studies classes at school put Bhutto's nationalisation policies in an extremely negative light, which is further used as proof against the weakness of a planned economy.

By the time students start higher education, there is a strong focus on entrepreneurship, with academic literature arguing strongly in favour of profit and private ownership. While the curricula in business schools suffer from academic bias, the quality of education within social science has a different problem – a severe lack of quality.

It is no wonder that every time higher education in the country is discussed, we all know what the best business, engineering and medical institutions are, but are clueless when it comes to identifying the best social sciences institutions. Also, a large chunk of students beginning their bachelor degrees usually have the field with social science as their last option which means that exposure to academic literature on an alternative political school of thought, such as socialism, is not automatically present for fresh minds.

2. Religion

Pakistan has turned into a deeply religious society over the years, which is in stark contrast to socialism's hostile attitude towards religion. A far cry from embracing atheism, Pakistani society is not even open to the idea of secularism.

While there have been instances in the past where religion and socialism have been mixed by various leaders, even with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto bringing forward his brand of Islamic Socialism, separation of religion and state (even if it doesn't go as far as state atheism ), is necessary to move into a classless socialist society. Since religion has become such an integral part of the daily lives of average Pakistanis, opening the mind to a political ideology that argues the exact opposite is extremely difficult.

3. Decline of Pakistan People's Party

Even though Pakistan People's Party (PPP) abandoned its socialist roots a long time ago, its demise as a force at the federal level has done more harm than good for socialism in Pakistan. Historically, PPP has been the country's largest left-wing political party to argue for socialism. It has seen a rapid decline in popularity over the last few years, primarily because of the party's extremely poor performance in office, during its last tenure at the helm, and from being, arguably, the most popular and well organised political party in the country back in the day, now the PPP has been reduced to a regional party.

The decline of PPP has dealt socialist thought in Pakistan a blow since now the average Pakistani voter looks towards alternatives such as the largely conservative Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). Despite moving away from socialism, the PPP did, at least at some point in time, advocate for it, unlike the PML-N and PTI which argue on opposing ideological footings.

4. Focus on civil liberties, not enough on labour struggle

Over the last few years, Pakistan has seen an explosion of commentary and activism in favour of civil liberties. From women's rights to religious coexistence, a day doesn't go by when an article or blog on a topic arguing for civil liberties does not pop up.

However, there has been an almost complete lack of commentary on labour struggle, one of the central topics in Marxist theory and in turn, socialism. Perhaps the realisation of class conflict has not seeped into every day thought for Pakistanis yet, which is why labour struggle has not been present in mainstream socio-political discussions.

As a society that has suffered from a large amount of infringement on personal space and rights, the impulse is always to speak out in favour of civil liberties, since they directly impact our daily lives. Labour struggles, incorrectly in our minds; do not impact our average everyday lives, which could potentially be one of the reasons behind the apathetic attitude towards it. Also, it is pertinent to point out that trade unions in Pakistan do not yield enough influence which makes labour struggle even more difficult.

5. False view of the socialist/communist ideology

From a historical point of view, the Cold War communist world in Pakistan (like large parts of the rest of the world) has been extremely negative, generally consisting of state brutality, economic mismanagement, unparalleled red tape-ism and massive corruption. This in turn, has lent a more favourable view of opposing political and economic ideologies, and discarded the socialist school of thought.

While criticism of the Cold War communist states is completely justified, the fact that the States in question did not practice communism or socialism in its actual form has never crossed most people's minds. Socialist ideology is actually the exact opposite of what was carried out in the Cold War communist States, and in many ways; modern States such as North Korea. However, this is not discussed enough, since the image of the socialist world in young minds exposed to history, continues to be negative and no effort has been put into changing that.
 
[H1]Pakistan: failing state or neoliberalism in crisis?[/H1]
The popular image of Pakistan is of a failing state with nuclear weapons. Neither the government nor the army can prevent the Taliban's terrorist outrages, not least because they cannot do without the proxy forces they use against Afghanistan and India, forces often indistinguishable from the Taliban in their methods. What follows seeks to show the falsity of this pathologising, Islamophobic mythology that pays little attention to Pakistan's place in the global division of labour. It applies an understanding of imperialism as the combination of the unequal competition between capitals and the geopolitical conflicts between states aiming to show that the core elements of Pakistan's crisis are not unique to Pakistan but result from dynamics which always produce uneven results.

Our starting point is the world economy. With global economic growth slow and without a full recovery from the 2008 crash, despite record stock market highs, Pakistan's annual growth, at just over 4 percent, barely keeps GDP per head rising. Growth of 7 percent is needed to absorb the annual 2 million increase in the labour force. The resultant poverty for most of its 180 million people, half of them under 25, is not specific to Pakistan. Rather, as Karl Marx put it, "an accumulation of misery [is] a necessary condition, corresponding to the accumulation of wealth".1 But why is Pakistan's performance so weak when compared to most of South and East Asia? The argument that imperialism has underdeveloped Pakistan as some form of neo-colony is mistaken.2 The reasons for Pakistan's failure to join the Asian tigers do not lie in unmediated North on South pressures from the heart of the beast, depriving Pakistan of access to productive resources.3 Rather the explanation lies in the failure of the Pakistan bourgeoisie to establish its territory as a location for successful accumulation in a world dominated by competing global capitals. Unlike India and South Korea, it has failed to establish its own multinationals. This is despite the geopolitical advantages it possesses with major powers competing to strengthen their influence.

Pakistan's colonial legacy

It is true that the early stages of capitalism as a global system, the primitive accumulation of capital, saw the Indian subcontinent robbed of greater wealth than anywhere else.4 The destruction of much of its textile industry in the 18th and 19th centuries created a huge, captive market for British exports. Yet under imperial domination of the world's most valuable colony there was a willingness to develop selected productive capacity in the Indian subcontinent.5 Arguably the most important example was the expansion of the Indus irrigation system in Punjab. Today it is the world's largest, valued at $300 billion.6 Securing the north western border with Afghanistan against the expanding empire of the Russian tsars, the so-called "Great Game", was an important element of British imperial strategy.

The British used a peculiarly sharp form of divide and rule in creating "Muslim" Pakistan in 1947. Partition, the division of the subcontinent, came at the cost of over a million lives. Pakistan was based on the large landowners of Punjab and, on the opposite side of the subcontinent, the privileged few of East Bengal in what would later become independent Bangladesh.7 Together with the mohajirs, educated migrants from northern India, they saw the opportunities to be gained from creating their own state. The result was a truncated state dominated by mohajir and Punjabi elites who oppressed all other nationalities including Sindhis, Pashtuns, Balochis and Bengalis economically, politically and culturally. The need to have India as a threat that justified Pakistan's existence guaranteed that throughout the Cold War the subcontinent would never unite against the US and its allies. In two halves on opposite sides of the subcontinent separated by a thousand miles of hostile territory, starting with just 9 percent of the industry and virtually none of the banks that had existed in previously united India, Pakistan would always struggle to compete.
Pakistan: failing state or neoliberalism in crisis? • International Socialism (isj.org.uk)
 
I believe in our country just like in India the converted bhraymuns are in power as the waderay n chaudhrys. The feudal setup created by da Brits/ culture almost guarantees ruling da ghareeb converted masses via intellect n trickery. It's a sad existence for the 90% of our awaam who don't got an education nor any access to it nor healthcare/ social support. The elites use third class deobandi/ wahabbi islam as the hammer on da racial dalit convert anvil. It's true guys.....It's just a sad reflection of our society. I don't know any other way to describe dis misery. I hope to god that Iran intervenes and saves our country along brotherhood and camaraderie. Vurna hum nay dobara say hindu bun jana hae, just down da road. You guys need to have a think about dis. Our ghareeb ain't goin listen to Russians or Chinese........but they might just listen to da Irani's along cultural/ historic lines and get up on their feet and stop begging the west and China for help. Somebody with a long stick needs to be appointed ASAP like Ayub Khan sahb and he sorts out this chutiya mess.
 
I believe in our country just like in India the converted bhraymuns are in power as the waderay n chaudhrys. The feudal setup created by da Brits/ culture almost guarantees ruling da ghareeb converted masses via intellect n trickery. It's a sad existence for the 90% of our awaam who don't got an education nor any access to it nor healthcare/ social support. The elites use third class deobandi/ wahabbi islam as the hammer on da racial dalit convert anvil. It's true guys.....It's just a sad reflection of our society. I don't know any other way to describe dis misery. I hope to god that Iran intervenes and saves our country along brotherhood and camaraderie. Vurna hum nay dobara say hindu bun jana hae, just down da road. You guys need to have a think about dis. Our ghareeb ain't goin listen to Russians or Chinese........but they might just listen to da Irani's along cultural/ historic lines and get up on their feet and stop begging the west and China for help. Somebody with a long stick needs to be appointed ASAP like Ayub Khan sahb and he sorts out this chutiya mess.
Even Iranians have a large elite class, and their lavish lives do not match ordinary Iranians'. So, don't say that all Iranians live in paradise. That would be a false generalization. Yes, their average is much better than our average, but they still have a long way to go to fight corruption and inequalities.
On the other hand, The third-class Deobandi/ wahabbis in Pakistan will tell our people not to follow the Iranians, or they will end up in eternal Jahannam. Poor and ignorant folks will agree.
 
Thats why Pakistan needs to change its domestic policies.
We need to industrialize and we need to improve our economy.
We need to have a manufacturing based economy.
You can not have an industrial-based economy if spiraling inflation and costs of production continue to rise. The country is managed by FA/FSc pass people for god sake. lol

Read this : Foreign firms looking for a way out of unstable Pakistan | fDi Intelligence – Your source for foreign direct investment information - fDiIntelligence.com
 
Iran should help us get up on our feet and become a responsible player at least in the regional sphere. Otherwise wes not goin make it folks. The level of corruption and exploitation of 250 million Pakistani ghareeb converts is literally off da scales! Hamaray mulk ka boht bura haal hae ga, half our population is starving by any measurable metric or standard. China has unfortunately been asked to leave Pakistan so now it’s up to the irani’s to intervene and save the republic. Irans got education, industry and energy. Sawdi bhungi only got da energy and he loves da modi. No point mincing words…..these are the facts!
 
Iran should help us get up on our feet and become a responsible player at least in the regional sphere. Otherwise wes not goin make it folks. The level of corruption and exploitation of 250 million Pakistani ghareeb converts is literally off da scales! Hamaray mulk ka boht bura haal hae ga, half our population is starving by any measurable metric or standard. China has unfortunately been asked to leave Pakistan so now it’s up to the irani’s to intervene and save the republic. Irans got education, industry and energy. Sawdi bhungi only got da energy and he loves da modi. No point mincing words…..these are the facts!
We should do that for ourselves, we have a population three times bigger, but nothing will solve until the mullah issue is solved
 
You can not have an industrial-based economy if spiraling inflation and costs of production continue to rise. The country is managed by FA/FSc pass people for god sake. lol

Read this : Foreign firms looking for a way out of unstable Pakistan | fDi Intelligence – Your source for foreign direct investment information - fDiIntelligence.com
We should ask China and GCC countries to bail us out. Then we can pay them back once our economy is doing well.

We should get Chinese and Japanese economic advisors.
 
We should do that for ourselves, we have a population three times bigger, but nothing will solve until the mullah issue is solved
Molvi issue is army invented and sustained. Without molvi issue there is a very strong possibility of ‘ghar wapsi’…..the UK created the country for their own benefit, and if you observe closely, they are the only stakeholders.
 

Staff online

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back