Donate ☕
201 Military Defense Forums
[🇧🇩] - BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense | Page 2 | PKDefense
Home Login Forums Wars Movies Watch Videos
Serious discussion on defense, geopolitics, and global security.

[🇧🇩] BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense
115
5K
More threads by Saif

15 YEARS OF BDR MUTINY​

No end to wait for justice​

Judge shortage holds back hearing of appeals against conviction, 283 in jail after acquittal of murder charges​

Muktadir Rashid and M Moneruzzaman | Published: 00:34, Feb 25,2024


facebook sharing button
226321_173.jpg

twitter sharing button

Families of the victims as well as the accused soldiers still cry for justice as appeals against convictions in the murder case for the February 25–26, 2009 mutiny in the border force are still pending with the Appellate Division, while a case under the explosives act is pending with the trial court.

Justice into the killings of 75 people, mostly army officers deputed in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles, has not been delivered even after 15 years of the mutiny in the border force, while many former soldiers and civilians have been languishing in jail for years and dozens have died pending trials.

Those who were acquitted by a trial court in November 2013 of the murder charge have been in jail as another case related to explosive substances is still pending with the trial court.

The families of the accused and convicts said at least 48 people have died in jail custody since the trial started, while the plot and plotters are yet to be identified.
‘Many questions about the incident are yet to be answered,’ said retired Lieutenant Colonel Mustafizur Rahman, who investigated the incident during his posting in army intelligence and later left the job and the country.

He said that their investigation could not identify many perpetrators.

Family members of the accused and convicts said that they were devastated by the event and its aftermath, and they wanted immediate disposal of the trials pending both in the Supreme Court and trial court.

The shortage of Appellate Division judges caused the delay in holding hearings on 71 appeals filed by the government and the convicts, according to attorney general AM Amin Uddin.

‘A special bench with at least four judges will be needed to hear and dispose of the large volume of appeals,’ Amin told reporters at his office on Thursday.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred BDR soldiers took arms against their officers deputed from the army at Durbar Hall during their annual gathering at the paramilitary headquarters in Dhaka, leaving 75 people—57 army officers, two wives of army officers, nine BDR soldiers, five civilians, an army soldier, and a police constable—killed.
Border guard special courts sentenced 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases—one filed for the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act—are still pending with the court.

A case filed under the Explosive Substances Act against 833 BDR personnel and a civilian is pending with the Dhaka Metropolitan Sessions Judge Court, and 273 of the 1,344 prosecution witnesses have so far been examined, said deputy chief prosecutor Sheikh Baharul Islam.

Only 18 prosecution witnesses were examined between February 2023 and February 2024, according to a court document.

The appeals filed by death-row convicts against their sentences and another by the government against the acquittal of some soldiers by the High Court in the murder case await an Appellate Division hearing.

Attorney general Amin said that the special bench required for the pending hearings could not be constituted unless new judges were appointed to the Appellate Division.
Two major cases were investigated jointly by the Criminal Investigation Department, and the trial started in 2011 against 850 riflemen and civilians.

Amid the simultaneous trial, the trial court continued the trial of the case filed for murder and other offences, slowing down proceedings in the explosives case.

On November 5, 2013, additional sessions judge Akhtaruzzaman, who was later elevated to the High Court as judge, pronounced the verdict in the murder case, sentencing 151 soldiers and civilian Zakir Hossain to death.

The court also jailed 160 soldiers, including late Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Nasiruddin Pintu, local Awami League leader and retired BDR subedar Md Torab Ali, for life terms, and 256 others for varying terms.

It acquitted 278 people. Four others died before the verdict.

In November 2017, the special High Court bench of Justice Md Shawkat Hossain, Justice Md Abu Zafor Siddique, and Justice Md Nazrul Islam Talukder upheld the death sentences of 139 soldiers. It commuted the death sentences of seven soldiers and Md Zakir Hossain, then a local Awami League leader, to life in jail.

The court acquitted four soldiers of the charges, and BDR deputy assistant director Habibur Rahman died in jail custody in February 2014 while his appeal against the death sentence was pending with the High Court.

The High Court upheld the life terms of 146 BDR personnel and acquitted 12 others of their life terms. Two others died during the pendency of their appeals.

Defence lawyers and family members said that a total of 283 acquitted people and 190 others, who completed their short jail terms in other cases, were still languishing in jail due to the delayed trial of the explosives case.

‘My brother sepoy Darul Islam was in Peelkhana during the mutiny. He was arrested later. He was jailed for seven years on the charge of murder but acquitted of the charges of murder, arson, and other heinous crimes. It’s been 10 years, he was not released,’ Sabuj Miah told New Age over phone.

He said that they had been trying to draw the attention of the government and judiciary to how the former troopers were facing injustice.

The attorney general said that the government filed 20 appeals in December 2020.

Death-row convicts filed 35 appeals in January and February 2021 against their sentences, a court official said. The attorney general said all appeals would be heard together.

Both the government inquiry committee, headed by former secretary Anis-uz-Zaman Khan, and an investigation conducted by the army failed to identify the plot and the plotters.

The report by Anis-uz-Zaman recommended an investigation into the failure to gather intelligence about the planned mutiny. The army did not make the results of its investigation public.

New York-based rights group Human Rights Watch said that it had obtained the report and stated that the report faulted the government for not having taken a stronger line against BDR before the rebellion.

The successive Awami League government has so far initiated no further investigation recommended by the two probe bodies, while the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party has been saying that they will identify the perpetrators if voted to power.

HRW also urged the government to establish an independent investigative and prosecutorial task force with sufficient expertise, authority, and resources to rigorously investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute all allegations of unlawful deaths, torture, and mistreatment of suspects in the BDR mutiny, regardless of the perpetrator’s rank or institutional affiliation.

Families of slain officers and convicted soldiers said that the nation should know the reason for the rebellion, as well as the plot and plotters because neither an investigation nor a trial revealed them.

Slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman, repeatedly said that the pawns were tried but the plotters were not identified.

As of February 24, a total of 761 BDR jawans have been detained in Dhaka Central Jail, Kashimpur High Central Jail-1, Kashimpur Central Jail-2, and Kashimpur High Security Central Jail, according to the directorate of the prisons.

Senior military and civilian officials will pay tribute to the graves of killed soldiers at their military graveyard in the capital’s Banani today.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

AL, its govt involved in BDR carnage: Fakhrul​


AL, its govt involved in BDR carnage: Fakhrul


BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir on Sunday alleged that Awami League and its government were involved in the BDR mutiny at the Pilkhana Headquarters that left 57 army officers killed.

"The Awami League government gets unnerved whenever 25 February comes. One of their (govt's) ministers said yesterday (Saturday) whether our leaders Begum Khaleda Zia and Tarique Rahman were involved in that carnage," he said.

Speaking at a discussion, the BNP leader further said, "We would like to say very clearly that Awami League and its government were fully involved in this killing. With their direct cooperation and through their conspiracy and plan, this BDR carnage was carried out to turn Bangladesh into a weak subservient state and to completely demoralize the patriotic army of the country."

Fakhrul said the government's involvement can easily be understood as it talked to the rebel leaders and made a negotiation with them at the time of the mutiny. "What kind of negotiation it was? You compromised with those who were killing the smart officers of our army."

As per the rules of the Army, he said the mutiny must be suppressed through intervention, not by another means. "Moeen U Ahmed was the then Army Chief who played the main role in destroying democracy in Bangladesh through 1/11 (political changeover) and who tried to hamper the country's independence and destroy the army."

BNP arranged the discussion at Dhaka Reporters' Unity (DRU) in memory of 57 army officers killed in the BDR mutiny 14 years back.

On 25-26 February 2009, a cabal of the then Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) killed 74 people, including 57 army officers, of the paramilitary force at the Pilkhana Headquarters.

Following the heinous killings of the army officers at the Pilkhana headquarters, the government renamed the mutiny-hit paramilitary force BDR as Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), changing its logo as well as uniform.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Army dropped plans to attack BDR HQ on Hasina's advice'​

PTI | ByHT Correspondent, Dhaka
Mar 01, 2009 02:57 PM IST

Bangladesh Army was ready to storm the headquarters of the BDR in Dhaka soon after the mutiny erupted, but heeded to Premier Sheikh Hasina's advice at the last minute to resolve the issue politically, a top officer has revealed. "The Prime Minister directed that the crisis be solved politically and it has been resolved in that manner," Brig. Gen. Mahmud Hossain, Director of Military Intelligence said.​


Bangladesh Army was ready to storm the headquarters of the BDR in Dhaka soon after the mutiny erupted, but heeded to Premier Sheikh Hasina's advice at the last minute to resolve the issue politically, a top officer has revealed.
"The Prime Minister directed that the crisis be solved politically and it has been resolved in that manner," Brig. Gen. Mahmud Hossain, Director of Military Intelligence, told a press conference in Dhaka last night.

He said the army was ready to put down the BDR mutiny soon after it began on Wednesday, but decided to support Hasina's decision to solve the issue politically.

The bloody two-day revolt by the renegade soldiers of the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles left at least 73 Army officers and four civilians dead.

Terming it "possibly the worst massacre of Army officers in Bangladesh's history", Brig Hossain said the anger among the armed forces was "very natural".

"However, the Army is a disciplined force which can control its emotion", he said.

Asked if a retaliation by the army would have led to more bloodshed, army doctor Col. Abdul Salam, who was also present at the press conference, said "it's a difficult question but the restraint by the Army was good."

Outraged over the killing of its officers during the mutiny by BDR soldiers, the Bangladesh Army demanded "maximum" punishment for those involved in the massacre.

"Exemplary punishment of the culprits will cool our resentment. Our demand is that the investigation into the killings should be quickened and maximum punishment should be given to those persons responsible for them," Brig. Hossain said.

He said the Army has begun its own probe into the killings of its officers during the mutiny even as the investigation ordered by a government-constituted committee continues.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
If Hasina wasn't the culprit then why on earth did she call Indian foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee? India was quick to blame Jamaat-e Islami for the BDR mutiny to hide its involvement in the mindless killings of 57 army officers. I firmly believe the BDR mutiny was the dirty work of India and Awami League. The truth shall come out one day and the justice will be done to punish India and Awami League for their crimes.


Hasina sought int'l help after mutiny​

She phoned Pranab, states US cable leaked by WikiLeaks

After the 2009 BDR mutiny, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had telephoned India's External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee requesting assistance from the international community, The Hindu reported citing a leaked US embassy cable.


Though Hasina had not been specific about the kind of help she needed, Pranab had offered “to be responsive” if needed and the Indian government had also rallied London, Beijing and Tokyo to support the cause, the article published yesterday said.


Nirupama Subramanian wrote that US Embassy Charge d'Affaires Steven White was surprised when he was called in for a meeting with Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon on the last weekend of February 2009.

That “unusual Saturday meeting” was to discuss the mutiny by troopers of the Bangladesh Rifles a couple of days earlier, and the worry in the Indian government about its implications for the newly elected government of Hasina, perceived as being a friend of India, the report said.

The cable that was sent on March 2, 2009 (194661: confidential), and accessed by The Hindu through WikiLeaks, details the conversation between the American stand-in envoy and Menon.

India feared that the Jamaat-e-Islami would exploit the instability resulting from the rebellion to “fish in troubled waters.”

The foreign secretary described the mutiny as long in the planning. Menon did not blame the Jamaat directly for it, but said the party was disappointed by the results of the December 2008 election, and the steps taken by the new government to counter extremism.

Secondly, it appears India was worried that the mutiny could affect the civilian government's relations with the military.

Menon expressed concern about the likely effect of the violence on the army, which had lost several officers while quelling the mutiny. The foreign secretary indicated this might lead to trouble for the Hasina government with the army.

He noted that the mutineers had thrown the bodies of military officials into sewers. But he was encouraged that the army chief was working closely with the government to stabilise the situation.

“Menon appreciated the US statement on the violence and stressed the importance of close coordination and consultation between the US and India as the situation developed. He warned that while the initial violence was over, it would take several days before it was clear what would happen next and that further trouble was possible,” the US official cabled.

A month later, India continued to be worried about the after-effects of the mutiny. On March 26, 2009, the US embassy in Delhi cabled (198952: confidential) that India's main concern was to stabilise Prime Minister Hasina's government, the article wrote.

The ministry of external affairs deputy secretary told embassy officials that India was concerned about the possible involvement of “radical forces.”

He related that many of the known culprits in the massacre were recruited under the previous BNP government and have Jamaat-e-Islami links.

The Indian foreign secretary shared with US Ambassador Peter Burleigh his assessment that the situation in Bangladesh was “fragile” following the mutiny, Nirupama wrote.

According to a cable sent on April 16, 2009 from New Delhi (202615: confidential) reporting the meeting, Menon expressed the Indian government's worry that the current environment would allow extremist groups in Bangladesh to destabilise the democratic government and provide them with a “freer hand” to launch attacks in India.

“Pressed by the ambassador to identify which groups India was concerned about, Mr. Menon said that India's worries extended from political parties like the Jamaat-e-Islami to extremist groups like the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, Bangadesh (HUJI, B),” the embassy cabled.

The Indian official told the US ambassador that even though petty issues often consumed politics in Bangladesh, he was surprised that despite the instability created by the mutiny, “politicians were focused on matters such as Opposition Leader Begum Zia's housing.”

“India was concerned about a sense of drift in the government and [Menon] judged that the government was not functioning in a normal fashion,” the cable said.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond
Dr. Moyen talks about BDR Mutiny.

 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Pinaki Bhattacharya Talks about BDR Killings---Part-1​


 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

⤵︎

Latest Posts