[🇧🇩] BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saif
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 102
  • Views Views 2K
[🇧🇩] BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense
102
2K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense Forum
āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻž āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ†āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§āĻœāĻžāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ• āĻšāĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ |
Pilkhana tragedy was an international conspiracy




Very sad turn of events - and miscalculation on the part of the perpetrators if they thought they'd be able to get away with this.

Rather daring - I must say.
 

Full truth of BDR carnage a must
19 August, 2024, 00:00

VICTIM families of the 2009 carnage in the headquarters of the Bangladesh Rifles, now renamed as the Border Guard Bangladesh, term the earlier legal proceedings a mockery of justice, noting that partisan interests of the Awami League government, overthrown on August 5, clouded the investigation. Several hundred border guards took up arms against their officers deputed from the army in February 25–26, 2009, leaving 75 people, including 57 army officers, dead. Special courts imprisoned 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on rebellion charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka and two criminal cases — related to the murders and under explosive substances — are pending with the court. Members of the families of the slain officers at a press conference in Dhaka on August 18 said that the narrative of a dispute over benefits disparity between the BDR and the army was false, noting that it was done to deflect attention away from the motives. Terming the massacre an unprecedented event in which Awami League political figures, including the now-deposed prime minister, conspired with a foreign nation to orchestrate the killing, the families demanded an independent investigation commission.

This is, however, not the first time that the families have made such demands, but their call for justice and an independent investigation, as the son of the slain BDR director general alleges, was met with death threats from some Awami League leaders. Immediately after the carnage, two committees were formed, but neither could establish the motive or the masterminds. None of the reports were made public in their entirety and the families alleged that the report partially released had been revised three times before its publication. They, therefore, demanded that the reports should be made public immediately so that a transparent investigation of the incident could be possible. Many BDG soldiers, under trial and convicted, levelled serious allegations of custodial torture. International rights organisations condemned the unfair mass trial after the use of torture, particularly when the death penalty is involved. The Awami League regime, however, maintained its partisan narrative that the murderous event was a result of a dispute over material benefits between the two forces which is believed to have obstructed justice.

The allegations that a foreign government was involved in the carnage and a political party presiding over the government that time played an active role in it are too serious to have been left uninvestigated. The interim government must, therefore, take early steps to form an independent commission, as suggested by the High Court in 2017, and make all previous investigation reports public. People can now expect a credible investigation and the full truth of the BDR carnage, considering that the home affairs adviser to the interim government was the head of one of the earlier committees.​
 
Very sad turn of events - and miscalculation on the part of the perpetrators if they thought they'd be able to get away with this.

Rather daring - I must say.

Hasina should be sued and India should be brought down to its knees by aiding insurgency in North-East for masterminding the BDR Carnage.
 
[H3]'āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŖā§‡āĻ˛ āĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻœāĻžāĻ°āĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻœāĻž āĻ†āĻœāĻŽā§‡āĻ° āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§āĻŦā§‡ āĻ¯ā§āĻŦāĻ˛ā§€āĻ—[/H3]


 

Families for fresh probe, making findings public
Tanzil Rahaman 24 August, 2024, 00:35

1724457053269.png

Families of military officers, who were killed during the BDR munity, pray for divine blessings for the salvation of the departed souls at the graveside at Banani Military Graveyard in Dhaka on 26 February, 2021. | New Age file photo

Families of the victims of the February 25–26, 2009 rebellion in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles demanded to the interim government a fresh inquiry into the killing of 75 people, including 57 army officials, to unearth the plot and plotters behind the carnage.

They also demanded public release of the findings, including the progress of the inquiries already carried out by the Bangladesh Army and home ministry, for collecting proper evidence and prosecuting the perpetrators of the massacre at the headquarters of the border forces, later renamed as Border Guard Bangladesh.

Rakin Ahmed, son of slain former BDR director general Major General Shakil Ahmed and Naznin Ahmed, both of whom were murdered during the carnage, told New Age on Thursday that they appealed for fresh inquiries by the interim government to collect evidence.

In the aftermath of the massacre, the home ministry and Bangladesh Army launched separate inquiries, and now retired Lieutenant General Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, currently the home affairs adviser to the Professor Muhammad Yunus-led interim government, headed the army inquiry.

‘We know that the incumbent home affairs adviser Jahangir Alam was under pressure during the inquiry when the Awami League was in power. We demand a restart of the inquiry for collecting evidence and making it public,’ said Rakin.

On August 16, 2024, families had sent a statement to law adviser Asif Nazrul and home adviser Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman confirmed the matter to New Age.

‘We are the family members of the Bangladesh Army officers martyred in the BDR Pilkhana killings (Shaheed Families) on 25–26 February 2009. We, who are left behind, the martyrs’ mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters, spouses, sons and daughters, have endured profound despair for 15 years. Today we call upon the interim government to uphold our right to the truth and to justice, by taking the following measures,’ the statement read.

The statement called upon the interim government to take up eight measures.

Their first demand is to publicly release the reports of all investigations carried out into the tragedy, including those held by the home ministry and army.

Their second demand is setting up of an inquiry commission in the public interest following the High Court recommendations in its 2017 judgment (published in 2020) relating to the BDR Pilkhana killings to unearth the facts behind the carnage.

The victim families’ third demand is more institutional measures to commemorate the BDR tragedy—publishing a gazette declaring February 25 as ‘Shaheed Shena Dibash’; acknowledge each fallen officer as a ‘Shaheed’ or martyr; keeping the national flag at half-mast on every February 25; and include a chapter in school textbooks on the BDR Pilkhana tragedy recognising the sacrifices of the people martyred there.

They also demanded in the statement the release of the innocent ‘Jawans’ (former BDR soldiers) who have been wrongly detained in the cases relating to the 2009 rebellion.

Bangladesh Army officers who lost their jobs for rightfully voicing their opinions for proper justice must be reinstated or duly compensated, the statement added.

Slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman said that they demanded that justice must prevail and no innocent people get punished.

Neither law adviser Asif Nazrul nor home adviser Jahangir responded to phone calls and messages for comments.

Justice into the killings of 75 people, mostly army officers deputed in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles, has not been delivered even after about 16 years have passed after the carnage, while many former soldiers and civilians have been languishing in jail for years and dozens have died pending trials.

Those who were acquitted by a trial court in November 2013 of the murder charge have been in jail as another case related to explosive substances is still pending with the trial court.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred Bangladesh Rifles soldiers took arms against their officers deputed from the army at Durbar Hall during their annual gathering at the paramilitary force’s headquarters in Dhaka, leaving 75 people—57 army officers, two wives of army officers, nine BDR soldiers, five civilians, an army soldier, and a police constable—killed.

Border guard special courts sentenced 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases—one filed for the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act—are still pending with the court.

The two major cases were investigated by the Criminal Investigation Department, and simultaneous trials started in 2011 against 850 riflemen and civilians.

In the middle of the trials, meanwhile, the court continued the trial of the case filed for murder and other offences, while slowing down the proceedings in the explosives case.

On November 5, 2013, additional sessions judge Akhtaruzzaman, who was later elevated to the High Court as a justice, pronounced the verdict in the murder case, sentencing 151 soldiers and civilian Zakir Hossain to death.

The court also jailed 160 soldiers, including late Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Nasiruddin Pintu and local Awami League leader and retired Bangladesh Rifles subedar Md Torab Ali who were handed life sentences, and 256 others for varying terms.

It acquitted 278 people. Four others died before the verdict.

Nehreen Ferdousi, wife of late colonel Md Mojibul Haque said that she did not believe that soldiers could do such massacre.

‘We demand that the masterminds are found out and brought to justice,’ Nehreen told New Age.

In November 2017, the special High Court bench of Justice Md Shawkat Hossain, Justice Md Abu Zafor Siddique, and Justice Md Nazrul Islam Talukder upheld the death sentences of 139 soldiers. It commuted the death sentences of seven soldiers and Md Zakir Hossain, then a local Awami League leader, to life in jail.

The court acquitted four soldiers of the charges, and BDR deputy assistant director Habibur Rahman died in jail custody in February 2014 while his appeal against the death sentence was pending with the High Court.

The High Court upheld the life terms of 146 BDR personnel and acquitted 12 others of their life terms. Two others died during the pendency of their appeals.

Both the government inquiry committee, headed by former secretary Anis-uz-Zaman Khan, and an investigation conducted by the army failed to identify the plot and the plotters. The report by Anis-uz-Zaman recommended an investigation into the failure to gather intelligence about the planned mutiny. The army did not make the results of its investigation public.

New York-based rights group Human Rights Watch said that it had obtained the report and stated that the report faulted the government for not having taken a stronger line against the Bangladesh Rifles before the rebellion.

The right group also urged the government to establish an independent investigative and prosecutorial task force with sufficient expertise, authority, and resources to rigorously investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute all allegations of unlawful deaths, torture and mistreatment of suspects in the BDR mutiny, regardless of the perpetrator’s rank or institutional affiliation.​
 
āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ•āĻŋ āĻ˜āĻŸā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‹, āĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ˜āĻŸā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‹?

 

Thorough investigation into BDR killings soon: home adviser

1725320061897.png

Photo: Star

Home Affairs Adviser Lt Gen (retd) Jahangir Alam Chowdhury has said that the process of a full investigation and the judicial probe into the Bangladesh Rifles (now the Border Guard Bangladesh) killings of 2009 will start soon.

The adviser made the remark while addressing reporters at the secretariat today.

The advisor said, "The incumbent government is determined to establish people's rights, good governance, and justice. Not only as a home adviser but also as a common citizen and former member of the army, I want justice for the BDR killings."

"A thorough investigation into the killing and a judicial process will be initiated soon," he added.

Before addressing the reporters, the advisor had a courtesy meeting with the Swiss Ambassador to Bangladesh.

Without elaborating on any details of the meeting, Jahangir said that they had discussed various issues during the meeting.

Jahangir did not take any questions from the reporters during or after the briefing.​
 

India, Sheikh Hasina blamed for 2009 BDR Mutiny
Staff Correspondent 01 September, 2024, 21:42

Speakers at a discussion blamed the ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina and the Indian government for the February 25–26, 2009 rebellion in the headquarters of erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles, now Border Guard Bangladesh.

Forming a strong commission to investigate the incident and restoring the previous name of the paramilitary force, BDR, instead of its present name BGB were also demanded in the event on Sunday.

The discussion titled ‘Pilkhana Carnage: Hasina and India’s Conspiracy’ was held at the Dhaka Reporters Unity organised by Bangladesh Policy Discourse.

Mentioning the BDR Carnage a long term plan, former Bangladesh Army Colonel Abdul Haque said, ‘Awami League leaders were involved in the killings during BDR mutiny. Fair investigation will reveal all this things. I was sacked from my job by the then Sheikh Hasina government for raising my voice about the matter.’

He said that India would grab the country completely if Hasina comes to power again.

Bangladesh Muslim League secretary general Kazi Abul Khair said that India had mainly plotted the Pilkhana carnage for vanishing the country.

‘The autocrat [Sheikh Hasina] was removed from power after hundreds of people and students sacrificed their lives. Without sacrificing the lives, we cannot be able to put down the autocrat from her chair,’ Abul mentioned.

He also urged the government to bring Awami League and its associates under law.

Kabir Hossain, father of Zabir Ibrahim killed in police firing on August 5, said that the prime accused in the killings during BDR mutiny and student-led mass uprising was Sheikh Hasina.

Kabir urged the interim government to bring Hasina back to the country and ensure punishment.

Dhaka City College principal Kazi Neamul Haq and Islamic scholar Enayetullah Abbasi, among others, spoke at the discussion.

At least 75 people, including 57 army officers were killed in the BDR mutiny.​
 

āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻŦā§āĻ¯ āĻ¤ā§āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻž āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ
āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ‡ āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ–ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¤āĻž āĻļāĻŋāĻ—āĻ—āĻŋāĻ°āĻ‡ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ“ āĻ­āĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ“ āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ‰āĻ˛ā§āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ– āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

1725689532842.png

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ | āĻ›āĻŦāĻŋ: āĻ­āĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ“ āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻž

āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ° āĻĢā§‡āĻŦā§āĻ°ā§ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°āĻŋāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ° āĻĻāĻĒā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§ƒāĻļāĻ‚āĻ¸ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻ° āĻ­āĻžāĻˇā§āĻ¯ āĻ¤ā§āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ (āĻ…āĻŦ.) āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĨ¤

āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻĻāĻ°ā§āĻļā§€ āĻ“ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ…āĻ­āĻŋāĻœā§āĻžāĻ¤āĻž āĻ¤ā§āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋāĻ“ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻ­ā§‚āĻŽāĻŋāĻ•āĻž āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻžāĻ‡āĨ¤'

'āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻš āĻĻāĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€ āĻ¤āĻĨāĻž āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻ­ā§‚āĻŽāĻŋāĻ•āĻž āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤āĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻ• āĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖāĻž āĻĒā§‹āĻˇāĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° ā§§ā§Ģ āĻŦāĻ›āĻ° āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ†āĻŽāĻ°āĻž āĻļā§āĻ§ā§ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ—āĻ¤ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻļā§āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ—ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ•ā§ƒāĻ¤ āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ• āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§āĻ‡ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻœāĻ¨āĻ—āĻŖāĻ“ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĻŋ,' āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤

āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ‡ āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ–ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¤āĻž āĻļāĻŋāĻ—āĻ—āĻŋāĻ°āĻ‡ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻļāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻŦā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ“ āĻ­āĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ“ āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ‰āĻ˛ā§āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ– āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻ¯ā§āĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻĢā§āĻ˛ā§‹āĻ°āĻŋāĻĄāĻžā§Ÿ āĻ…āĻŦāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻ°āĻ¤ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻ—āĻ¤ āĻŦā§ƒāĻšāĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻ¤āĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ¨āĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻ° āĻ‡āĻ‰āĻŸāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŦ āĻšā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ“āĻ‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻœā§‡āĻ° āĻ­āĻžāĻˇā§āĻ¯ āĻ¤ā§āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ—āĻ¤ ā§¨ā§Ģ āĻ†āĻ—āĻ¸ā§āĻŸ āĻ‡āĻ‰āĻŸāĻŋāĻ‰āĻŦ āĻšā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ˛āĻŸāĻŋ āĻ–ā§‹āĻ˛āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ ā§¨ā§¯ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡āĻ° āĻ­āĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ“ āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¤ā§āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ§āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ° ā§¨ā§Ģ āĻĢā§‡āĻŦā§āĻ°ā§ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°āĻŋ āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻ—ā§āĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻŦāĻĒā§‚āĻ°ā§āĻŖ āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛â€”āĻœāĻŋāĻāĻ¸āĻĒāĻŋāĻ¸āĻŋ āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚āĨ¤ āĻāĻ‡ āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚ā§Ÿā§‡āĻ° āĻŽāĻžāĻ§ā§āĻ¯āĻŽā§‡ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€ āĻ¸āĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ¨ā§‡ā§Ÿ āĻ†āĻ—āĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻŦāĻ›āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ•ā§€ āĻ•ā§€ āĻœāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ¸ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ•āĻŋāĻ‰āĻ° āĻ•āĻ°āĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻœāĻŋāĻāĻ¸āĻĒāĻŋāĻ¸āĻŋ āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚ā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ…āĻ‚āĻļ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻšā§āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛āĻžāĻŽāĨ¤ āĻ†āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ• āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ āĻĒā§ŒāĻ¨ā§‡ ā§¯āĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¸āĻŋāĻœāĻŋāĻāĻ¸ āĻ˛ā§‡āĻĢāĻŸā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻŸ āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻ‡āĻŦāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻŽāĻžāĻ˛ā§€ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸ā§‡ āĻ†āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ›ā§‡ āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§ ā§Žā§§ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ˛āĻŋāĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ†āĻ›ā§‡, āĻ¯ā§‡āĻŸāĻž āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤ āĻāĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ—ā§āĻĻāĻžāĻŽāĻœāĻžāĻ¤ āĻ“ āĻ°āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻžāĻŖāĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŖ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ•āĻ āĻŋāĻ¨ āĻšā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻšā§āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° ā§Žā§§ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ˛āĻŋāĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻŦāĻšāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¯āĻĻāĻŋ āĻšā§‡āĻĄ āĻŸā§āĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻĢāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿ, āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ• āĻ‰āĻĒāĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤'

āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, āĻ¸ā§‡ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡ āĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻŸāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻŽāĻšāĻžāĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ• (āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋ) āĻŽā§‡āĻœāĻ° āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻļāĻžāĻ•āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻā§‡āĻ° (āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻšāĻ¤) āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻļāĻžāĻ•āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ…āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻ—ā§āĻ˛ā§‹ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻŋ āĻšāĻ¨āĨ¤

'āĻ•āĻĨāĻĒā§‹āĻ•āĻĨāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›ā§‡, āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻš āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ (āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋ) āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§āĻ‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ¨āĻž āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻžāĻ¸āĨ¤ āĻ¯āĻĻāĻŋ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¨āĻŋāĻļā§āĻšāĻŋā§ŸāĻ‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ…āĻŦāĻšāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤'

āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻāĻ‡ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻœāĻŋāĻāĻ¸āĻĒāĻŋāĻ¸āĻŋ āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻšāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ āĻ¸āĻžā§œā§‡ ā§¯āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻŋāĻĒāĻžāĻ˛ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ•ā§āĻ°ā§‡āĻŸāĻžāĻ°āĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻĢāĻŋāĻ°ā§‹āĻœ āĻ¸āĻ­āĻžāĻ•āĻ•ā§āĻˇā§‡ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŦā§‡āĻļ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ•āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ—āĻŖā§āĻĄāĻ—ā§‹āĻ˛ āĻšāĻšā§āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļāĻ¨āĻž āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āĻœāĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻ¸āĻ­āĻž āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻ—āĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻ“ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‹āĻ—āĻžāĻ¯ā§‹āĻ—ā§‡āĻ° āĻšā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ āĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ•āĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛, āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŽāĻ°āĻŋāĻ• āĻ—ā§‹ā§Ÿā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻĻāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻžāĻ§ā§āĻ¯āĻŽā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āĻ§ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻĨā§āĻ¯ āĻ†āĻ¸āĻž āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ˛āĨ¤ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§‹ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‹ āĻ•ā§€ āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ›ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ° āĻ­ā§ŸāĻžāĻŦāĻšāĻ¤āĻž āĻ‰āĻĒāĻ˛āĻŦā§āĻ§āĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻšāĻžāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ•āĻžāĻ°āĻ“ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļ āĻ›āĻžā§œāĻž āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° ā§Ēā§Ŧ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ¤āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ° āĻĒāĻĻāĻžāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ• āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ…āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻļāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤ āĻšāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļ āĻĻā§‡āĻ‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¤āĻžā§ŽāĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŖāĻŋāĻ•āĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ¯ā§āĻĻā§āĻ§āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡, āĻ¯āĻžāĻ° āĻ¨āĻžāĻŽāĻ•āĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§Ÿ "āĻ…āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻļāĻ¨ āĻ°āĻŋ-āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§‹āĻ° āĻ…āĻ°ā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ°"āĨ¤'

āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ ā§¯āĻŸāĻž ā§Ēā§­ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻĒāĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻž āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ‰āĻ˛ā§āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ– āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻ• āĻ­ā§ŸāĻžāĻŦāĻš āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ‚āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŋāĻĒā§āĻ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻŦāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ (āĻŽāĻšāĻžāĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ•) āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻĻāĻ°āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻĻā§āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻļāĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ° āĻ¸ā§ˆāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ• āĻĻāĻ°āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŦā§‡āĻļ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻāĻ•āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ° (āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋ) āĻĒā§‡āĻ›āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻāĻ¸ā§‡ āĻĻāĻžāĻā§œāĻžā§Ÿ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ…āĻœā§āĻžāĻžāĻ¨ āĻšā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ…āĻĒāĻ°āĻœāĻ¨ āĻĻāĻ°āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ˛ āĻ…āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŽ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻŦāĻžāĻ‡āĻ°ā§‡ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°āĻĒāĻ°āĻ‡ āĻŦāĻžāĻ‡āĻ°ā§‡ āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ° āĻļāĻŦā§āĻĻ āĻ†āĻ¸ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ° āĻļāĻŦā§āĻĻ āĻļā§‹āĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻĻāĻ°āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ‰āĻĒāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ¸ā§ˆāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ•ā§‡āĻ°āĻž āĻ—āĻŖā§āĻĄāĻ—ā§‹āĻ˛ āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡ā§Ÿ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻĻāĻžāĻā§œāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿ, āĻĻāĻ°āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ˛ āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦā§‡āĻ° āĻšā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤'

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‹ āĻ¸āĻŦ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻ•āĻ˛ā§āĻĒāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻ‚āĻļāĨ¤ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻ•āĻ˛ā§āĻĒāĻ¨āĻž āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§€ āĻŦāĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻ¤āĻŦāĻžā§ŸāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻšāĻšā§āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤'

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡, āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋ āĻ¸āĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ¯ā§āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ•āĻ˛ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻāĻŸāĻž āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¨ā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻĄāĻŋāĻœāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°āĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ†āĻŽāĻ°āĻž āĻ•ā§€ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻŦāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻž āĻ¨āĻŋāĻšā§āĻ›āĻŋ, āĻ¤āĻž āĻ‰āĻ¨āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ‡āĨ¤'

āĻ“āĻ‡ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ ā§¯āĻŸāĻž ā§Ģā§Ē āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻŽā§‹āĻŦāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‹āĻ—āĻžāĻ¯ā§‹āĻ— āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻ­āĻŦ āĻšā§Ÿ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ‰āĻ˛ā§āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ– āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ (āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž) āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻš āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ• āĻ¤āĻĨā§āĻ¯ āĻĒā§‡ā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ—āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ…āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻļāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻžāĻ¨, āĻ•āĻ¤āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŖ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ āĻ˛āĻžāĻ—āĻŦā§‡ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ˆāĻ°āĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡? āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻ˛āĻžāĻŽ, āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖāĻ¤ āĻ›ā§Ÿ āĻ˜āĻŖā§āĻŸāĻž āĻ˛āĻžāĻ—ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŦā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžā§œāĻžāĻ¤āĻžā§œāĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻĻā§āĻ‡ āĻ˜āĻŖā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡ āĻ¤ā§ˆāĻ°āĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻ¯āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤'

ā§Ēā§Ŧ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻĻāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĨ¤ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄāĻŸāĻŋ āĻāĻ• āĻ˜āĻŖā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻž āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ‰āĻ˛ā§āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ– āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, ā§Ēā§Ŧ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄā§‡āĻ° āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻ•āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻĄāĻžāĻ° āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄāĻŋā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻšāĻžāĻ•āĻŋāĻŽā§‡āĻ° āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§āĻŦā§‡ ā§§ā§Ļ āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻž āĻ“ ā§Ŧā§Ģā§Ģ āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§ˆāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ• āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ‰āĻĻā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻž āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ āĻ¸āĻžā§œā§‡ ā§§ā§ĻāĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄā§‡āĻ° āĻ…āĻ—ā§āĻ°āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§€ āĻĻāĻ˛ āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ—ā§‡āĻŸ āĻ…āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŽ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻ—ā§‡āĻŸāĻ—ā§āĻ˛ā§‹āĻ° āĻ¸āĻžāĻŽāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ†āĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŖ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤āĻŋāĻšāĻ¤ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ­āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¨ āĻ…āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ° āĻŽā§‹āĻ¤āĻžā§Ÿā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ ā§§ā§§āĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ ā§Ēā§Ŧ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄā§‡āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻĨāĻŽ āĻ—āĻžā§œāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻŽā§‡āĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ—ā§‡āĻŸā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ›āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻ›āĻŋ āĻĒā§ŒāĻāĻ›āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ•āĻ†āĻĒ āĻ˛āĻ•ā§āĻˇā§āĻ¯ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ°āĻ•ā§‡āĻŸ āĻšāĻžāĻŽāĻ˛āĻž āĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ• āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻŽāĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻĒāĻžāĻļā§‡ āĻŦāĻ¸āĻž āĻāĻ•āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ—ā§āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻ° āĻ†āĻšāĻ¤ āĻšāĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, ā§§ā§ĻāĻŸāĻž ā§Šā§Ģ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡āĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸ āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻŽāĻšāĻžāĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ•ā§‡āĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‹āĻ—āĻžāĻ¯ā§‹āĻ— āĻ•āĻ°āĻžāĻ° āĻšā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŦā§‡ āĻ¤āĻž āĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻ­āĻŦ āĻšā§ŸāĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤ āĻšā§ŸāĻ¤ā§‹ āĻāĻ° āĻ†āĻ—ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛āĨ¤

āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻ˛ā§‡āĻĢāĻŸā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻŸ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻļāĻžāĻŽāĻ¸ā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻ°āĻžāĻ¤ āĻĻāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻļāĻžāĻŽāĻ¸ā§‡āĻ° āĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖāĻž āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§€, āĻ¸āĻžā§œā§‡ ā§§ā§ĻāĻŸāĻž āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ ā§§ā§§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ• āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ°āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ—ā§‡āĻĄ āĻĒā§ŒāĻāĻ›āĻžā§Ÿ ā§§ā§§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĒāĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ•ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒā§āĻŸā§‡āĻ¨ āĻļāĻĢāĻŋāĻ• āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§āĻŦā§‡ ā§Šā§Ģā§Ģ āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ°â€ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻŦ āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻĒā§ŒāĻāĻ›āĻžāĻ¨ ā§§ā§ĻāĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ†āĻ—ā§‡āĻ‡āĨ¤ āĻ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻŠāĻ°ā§āĻ§ā§āĻŦāĻ¤āĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ›ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŦā§‡āĻļā§‡āĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻšāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ā§‡āĻ“ āĻ¤āĻž āĻĒāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻĒā§‡āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻšā§ŸāĻ¤ā§‹ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻŽā§‹āĻ•āĻžāĻŦāĻŋāĻ˛āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ§āĻž āĻšāĻ¤ā§‹ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻāĻ¤ āĻ•ā§āĻˇā§ŸāĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻšāĻ¤ā§‹ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤

āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, ā§§ā§§āĻŸāĻž ā§Ēā§Ģ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡āĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻ¸āĻ“ āĻāĻāĻĢāĻĄāĻŋ (āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¨ā§āĻ¸āĻŋāĻĒāĻžāĻ˛ āĻ¸ā§āĻŸāĻžāĻĢ āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ°â€“āĻ¸āĻļāĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ° āĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€ āĻŦāĻŋāĻ­āĻžāĻ—) āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻ¨ā§ˆāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ•āĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ¸āĻŽāĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻšā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻĻāĻžāĻŦāĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‡, āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ†āĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ†āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ•ā§‡ āĻāĻ‡ āĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ‡ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ†āĻĻā§‡āĻļ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛, āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻĻā§ƒāĻˇā§āĻŸāĻŋāĻ° āĻ†ā§œāĻžāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻ¤ āĻĻā§āĻ‡ āĻ•āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‹āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ‰āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§‡ āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻā§‹āĻ¤āĻž āĻ¨āĻž āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŽāĻ°āĻŋāĻ• āĻ…āĻ­āĻŋāĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤

āĻ†āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋāĻ• āĻĻā§āĻĒā§āĻ° ā§§ā§¨āĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻ¸āĻ“ āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻœāĻ°ā§āĻ°āĻŋ āĻ­āĻŋāĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€āĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡āĻ–āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻŽā§āĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻĻā§āĻĒā§āĻ° ā§§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻĻāĻž āĻĒāĻ¤āĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ†āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻŽā§€ āĻ˛ā§€āĻ— āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤āĻž āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ•āĻŦāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨āĻ• āĻ“ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻœāĻž āĻ†āĻœāĻŽ āĻ†āĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻāĻ°āĻ‡ āĻŽāĻ§ā§āĻ¯ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻž āĻšāĻ˛ā§‹, āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻĢāĻŸāĻ• āĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻžā§Ÿ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ°â€ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻŦ āĻ“ āĻĒā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻļ āĻ†āĻ°āĻ“ āĻĻā§āĻŸāĻŋ āĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻĄā§‡āĻ‡āĻ°āĻŋ āĻ—ā§‡āĻŸ āĻāĻ˛āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŸāĻŋ āĻ…āĻ°āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¯āĻŽā§āĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ—āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ• āĻ˛ā§‹āĻ•āĻ•ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡āĻ–ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¯āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ•āĻžāĻœ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ•ā§ŒāĻ¤ā§‚āĻšāĻ˛āĻŦāĻļāĻ¤ āĻāĻ¸ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¸āĻ­āĻž āĻŦā§ˆāĻ āĻ• āĻ•āĻ°āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛āĨ¤ āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ¸āĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ†āĻ¸āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ“āĻ‡ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒāĻžāĻ˛āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ†āĻ¸āĻž āĻāĻ•āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ› āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ•āĻ•ā§‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¸āĻ­āĻžāĻ° āĻĒāĻ° āĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻ›ā§‹āĻŸ āĻŦā§ˆāĻ āĻ• āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻĄāĻžāĻ•ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĻā§‡ā§œ āĻ˜āĻŖā§āĻŸāĻž āĻĒāĻ°ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ āĻ“ āĻ¨ā§ŒāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻ¨ā§ˆāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ•āĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ¸ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻŸāĻŋ āĻ¸āĻŽāĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻšā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻž āĻšāĻ˛āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻĢāĻœāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§‚āĻ° āĻ¤āĻžāĻĒāĻ¸, āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ•āĻŦāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨āĻ• āĻ“ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻœāĻž āĻ†āĻœāĻŽ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻĻāĻ˛āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¯āĻŽā§āĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ†āĻ¸āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž (āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž) āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŽāĻž āĻšāĻžā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ (āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž) āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻžāĻ° āĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ¯ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻāĻ•ā§‡ (āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž) āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŋ, "āĻ…āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻšāĻ¤ āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻĻāĻžāĻŦāĻŋ āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¯āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ†āĻĒāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻ˛āĻŦā§‡āĻ¨, āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻĨāĻŽāĻ¤, āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻāĻ‡ āĻŽā§āĻšā§‚āĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āĻ§ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ¤ā§€ā§ŸāĻ¤, āĻ¯āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻŸāĻ• āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›ā§‡, āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ¸āĻŦāĻžāĻ‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻāĻ–āĻ¨āĻ‡ āĻŽā§āĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§€ā§ŸāĻ¤, āĻ…āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°āĻ¸āĻš āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§āĻĨāĻ¤, āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŽāĻž āĻĻā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻ‡ āĻ“āĻ ā§‡ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤"'

āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ†āĻ°āĻ“ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻž āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§‡ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻŦā§ˆāĻ āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŦā§ˆāĻ āĻ•ā§‡ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻĢāĻœāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§‚āĻ° āĻ¤āĻžāĻĒāĻ¸, āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ•āĻŦāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨āĻ• āĻ“ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻœāĻž āĻ†āĻœāĻŽ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻĨāĻŽ āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¤āĻžāĻ° (āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨) āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ‡āĨ¤ āĻĒāĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĄāĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŽāĻž āĻ˜ā§‹āĻˇāĻŖāĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž ā§ŦāĻŸāĻž ā§Šā§­ āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŸā§‡ āĻ¯āĻŽā§āĻ¨āĻž āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ‰āĻĻā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļā§‡ āĻ°āĻ“āĻ¨āĻž āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ—āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ˜ā§‹āĻˇāĻŖāĻž āĻĻā§‡ā§Ÿ, āĻ¸āĻžāĻ§āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŽāĻžāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻœā§āĻžāĻžāĻĒāĻ¨ āĻ¨āĻž āĻšāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°āĻŦā§‡ āĻ¨āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ—ā§‹āĻ˛āĻžāĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻ“ āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ–ā§āĻāĻœāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•ā§‡āĨ¤

āĻ°āĻžāĻ¤ ā§§ā§¨āĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻ¸āĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ–āĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ¨, āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻĢāĻœāĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§‚āĻ° āĻ¤āĻžāĻĒāĻ¸ āĻ“ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻ†āĻ‡āĻœāĻŋāĻĒāĻŋ (āĻĒā§āĻ˛āĻŋāĻļā§‡āĻ° āĻŽāĻšāĻžāĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻĻāĻ°ā§āĻļāĻ•) āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ†āĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĨ¤ āĻāĻ• āĻĒāĻ°ā§āĻ¯āĻžā§Ÿā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻ•āĻŋāĻ›ā§ āĻ…āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ†āĻŸāĻŸāĻŋ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻ°āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŽā§āĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻļā§āĻ§ā§ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŸāĻŋ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ°āĻĻā§‡āĻ°āĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ–āĻžāĻ¤ā§āĻ¨ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ°āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻ¨ā§āĻĻāĻŋ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ°āĻžāĻ–āĻž āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¤āĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŽā§āĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ° āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§‡ āĻ‰āĻĻā§āĻ¯ā§‹āĻ— āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¨āĻ¨āĻŋ, āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻ–ā§‹āĻāĻœāĻ“ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¨āĻ¨āĻŋ, āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĨ¤

ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ° ā§¨ā§Ŧ āĻĢā§‡āĻŦā§āĻ°ā§ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°āĻŋ āĻ†āĻŦāĻžāĻ° āĻ—ā§‹āĻ˛āĻžāĻ—ā§āĻ˛āĻŋ āĻļā§āĻ°ā§ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻžāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ§āĻžāĻ¨āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻ¸āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ āĻ¸āĻžā§œā§‡ ā§§ā§ĻāĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻĄā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§‹ āĻšā§Ÿ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖ āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻ˛ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŽāĻ°āĻŋāĻ• āĻ…āĻ­āĻŋāĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ āĻĒāĻ°āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ˛āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ­āĻžāĻ° āĻĨā§‡āĻ•ā§‡ āĻŸā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ• āĻ†āĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻŽāĻ¤āĻŋ āĻšāĻžāĻ¨, āĻ¸ā§‡āĻŸāĻž āĻĻā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŸā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ• āĻ°āĻ“āĻ¨āĻž āĻĻā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ¤āĻžā§ŽāĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŖāĻŋāĻ•āĻ­āĻžāĻŦā§‡ āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļ āĻĻā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ“ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ“ā§ŸāĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨, āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻ“ āĻŸā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ‚āĻ• āĻ†āĻ¸āĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻļā§āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻ•ā§‹āĻ¨ā§‹ āĻļāĻ°ā§āĻ¤ āĻ›āĻžā§œāĻž āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖā§‡ āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻŋ āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻĻā§āĻĒā§āĻ° ā§¨āĻŸāĻžā§Ÿ āĻœāĻžāĻ¤āĻŋāĻ° āĻ‰āĻĻā§āĻĻā§‡āĻļā§‡ āĻ­āĻžāĻˇāĻŖ āĻĻāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖā§‡āĻ° āĻ¸āĻŽā§ŸāĻ¸ā§€āĻŽāĻž āĻŦā§‡āĻāĻ§ā§‡ āĻĻā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ‡ āĻĒāĻ°āĻžāĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻļ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ (āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨) āĻĻāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻ†āĻ•ā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻŖ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻŋ āĻĻā§‡āĻ–ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻ†āĻ˛ā§‹āĻšāĻ¨āĻž āĻ“ āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖā§‡āĻ° āĻœāĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻ‰āĻĻāĻ—ā§āĻ°ā§€āĻŦ āĻšā§Ÿ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻ¸āĻžāĻĻāĻž āĻĒāĻ¤āĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻŸāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻ°āĻžāĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻžāĻŦā§‡āĻ• āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āĻ°āĻŽāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§āĻ°ā§€āĻ° āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§āĻŦā§‡ āĻāĻ•āĻŸāĻŋ āĻĻāĻ˛ āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻŦā§‡āĻļ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻāĻŦāĻ‚ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§€āĻ°āĻž āĻ†āĻ¤ā§āĻŽāĻ¸āĻŽāĻ°ā§āĻĒāĻŖ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĨ¤ āĻāĻ° āĻŽāĻžāĻ§ā§āĻ¯āĻŽā§‡ ā§Šā§Š āĻ˜āĻŖā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° āĻ…āĻŦāĻ¸āĻžāĻ¨ āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤ āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻžāĻŖ āĻšāĻžāĻ°āĻžāĻ¨ ā§Ģā§­ āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻž, āĻ¯āĻžāĻ°āĻž āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻŽā§‡āĻ°ā§āĻĻāĻŖā§āĻĄ āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ¨āĻŋā§Ÿā§‡āĻ“ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, 'āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° āĻ˜āĻŸāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ†āĻŽāĻŋ āĻ¯āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§‡āĻ° āĻ†āĻĻā§‡āĻļ āĻĻāĻŋāĻ‡, āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦāĻ˛āĻž āĻšā§Ÿ; āĻ¯āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻāĻ‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ•āĻ°āĻ›ā§‡, āĻ¤āĻ–āĻ¨ āĻ†āĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻāĻ° āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āĻœāĻ¨āĻŸāĻž āĻ•ā§€?'

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻĒā§āĻ°āĻ¤āĻŋ-āĻ‰āĻ¤ā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§‡ āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻāĻ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻ…āĻĢāĻŋāĻ¸āĻžāĻ° āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ° āĻ•āĻžāĻ°āĻŖ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ•ā§‡ āĻŦā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻžāĻ°āĻĒāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ†āĻ° āĻ‰āĻšā§āĻšāĻŦāĻžāĻšā§āĻ¯ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤ āĻ¤āĻŦā§‡ āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ¤ā§‡āĻŽāĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻšāĻžā§ŸāĻ¤āĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨āĻŋāĨ¤ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻŦāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ•āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋāĻ° āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ¤ā§ƒāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āĻĻāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻ˛ā§‡āĻĢāĻŸā§‡āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻŸ āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ†āĻ˛āĻŽ āĻšā§ŒāĻ§ā§āĻ°ā§€ (āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āĻ° āĻ‰āĻĒāĻĻā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻž)āĨ¤

āĻŽāĻ‡āĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻ āĻ†āĻļāĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡āĻ¨, āĻœāĻžāĻšāĻžāĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§€āĻ° āĻ†āĻ˛āĻŽ āĻšā§ŒāĻ§ā§āĻ°ā§€ āĻ¤āĻĻāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ āĻ•āĻŽāĻŋāĻŸāĻŋ āĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻ°ā§āĻ—āĻ āĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ•āĻ°ā§‡ āĻœā§œāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻŦā§āĻ¯āĻ•ā§āĻ¤āĻŋāĻĻā§‡āĻ° āĻŦā§‡āĻ° āĻ•āĻ°āĻ¤ā§‡ āĻ¸āĻ•ā§āĻˇāĻŽ āĻšāĻŦā§‡āĻ¨āĨ¤

āĻ…āĻ¨ā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤ā§€āĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻ¸āĻ°āĻ•āĻžāĻ° āĻ—āĻ āĻ¨ā§‡āĻ° āĻĒāĻ° āĻ¤āĻŋāĻ¨āĻŋ āĻŽā§‹āĻŦāĻžāĻ‡āĻ˛ āĻĢā§‹āĻ¨ā§‡ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ°āĻžāĻˇā§āĻŸā§āĻ° āĻ‰āĻĒāĻĻā§‡āĻˇā§āĻŸāĻžāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ›ā§‡āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ“ āĻœāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ āĻ­āĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ“ āĻŦāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžā§ŸāĨ¤

āĻ°āĻžāĻœāĻ§āĻžāĻ¨ā§€āĻ° āĻĒāĻŋāĻ˛āĻ–āĻžāĻ¨āĻžā§Ÿ āĻ¤ā§ŽāĻ•āĻžāĻ˛ā§€āĻ¨ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° (āĻŦāĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻŽāĻžāĻ¨ā§‡ āĻŦāĻŋāĻœāĻŋāĻŦāĻŋ) āĻ¸āĻĻāĻ° āĻĻāĻĒā§āĻ¤āĻ°ā§‡ ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§¯ āĻ¸āĻžāĻ˛ā§‡āĻ° āĻ˜āĻŸā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻĻā§‡āĻļā§‡āĻ° āĻ‡āĻ¤āĻŋāĻšāĻžāĻ¸ā§‡āĻ° āĻ¨ā§ƒāĻļāĻ‚āĻ¸ āĻāĻ‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ•āĻžāĻŖā§āĻĄāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ°ā§‡āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡ āĻ“āĻ‡ āĻ¸āĻŽā§Ÿ ā§Ģā§­ āĻœāĻ¨ āĻ¸ā§‡āĻ¨āĻž āĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŽāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻ¤āĻžāĻ¸āĻš āĻŽā§‹āĻŸ ā§­ā§Ē āĻœāĻ¨āĻ•ā§‡ āĻšāĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻž āĻ•āĻ°āĻž āĻšā§ŸāĨ¤​
 
āĻŦāĻŋāĻĄāĻŋāĻ†āĻ° āĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āĻ°ā§‹āĻšā§‡āĻ° āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¨ āĻļā§‡āĻ– āĻšāĻžāĻ¸āĻŋāĻ¨āĻžāĻ° āĻ¸āĻ™ā§āĻ—ā§‡ āĻ•ā§€ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻšā§Ÿā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāĻ˛ āĻœā§‡āĻ¨āĻžāĻ°ā§‡āĻ˛ āĻŽāĻˆāĻ¨ āĻ‡āĻ‰ āĻ†āĻšāĻŽā§‡āĻĻā§‡āĻ°?

 

BDR Mutiny: Dismissed jawans demand reinstatement in their jobs with full facilities
UNB
Published :
Sep 27, 2024 20:39
Updated :
Sep 27, 2024 21:11

1727486054687.png


Affected members of the BDR mutiny of 2009 from 64 districts called for the reinstatement of innocent BDR personnel who were dismissed following the tragic events in Pilkhana on February 25-26, 2009.

They made the demands in a press conference held at the Dhaka Press Club on Friday.

The conference emphasized the necessity of a thorough and impartial investigation into those responsible for the killings, as well as the release of individuals who have been detained under the Explosive Substances Act for 15 years without due process.

Saeed Ahmed Khan, a dismissed BDR member, asserted that those accountable for the planned killings must face proper investigation. He stressed the importance of reinstating all innocent BDR members with full government benefits and called for expedited legal support for those unjustly imprisoned.

Khan pointed out that with the formation of a new government, there should be additional time allocated for a fair investigation. He welcomed the Home Advisor’s announcement regarding the establishment of a committee to re-investigate the Pilkhana incident.

Khan further explained that although no incident occurred outside Dhaka on February 25, 2009, rumors spread on February 26 about attacks on BDR units by the army, causing panic among BDR members in external units. This led to mass arrests under treason charges, with many receiving sentences through special courts despite the lack of evidence for the treason claims. He expressed hope that the current government would ensure justice through proper investigation and release the innocent BDR members while reinstating them with government benefits.

He also raised concerns about the Indian government issuing a red alert at 6am on February 25, three hours before the Pilkhana incident, questioning the motive behind this alert. Despite the chaos, BDR members involved in a meeting at the Jamuna River denied any killings had taken place, leaving the public unaware of the events.

Khan concluded by expressing his disapproval of a recent protest organized by a group claiming to represent the interests of the dismissed BDR members, stating that their demands lack moral support from those truly affected.​
 

Govt should form commission to credibly investigate BDR carnage
04 November, 2024, 00:00

THE demand of families of the victims of the rebellion at the Bangladesh Rifles, now renamed as Border Guard Bangladesh, and its sacked members for a commission to investigate the incident and bring actual perpetrators to justice is completely justified. BDR Kalyan Parishad on November 2 put forth the demand. The victims have also urged the government to reinstate jobs of more than 18,000 sacked members of the force, claiming that they were not actual perpetrators. The victim families have termed the earlier legal proceedings a mockery of justice and said that the toppled Awami League government manipulated the investigation of the rebellion, which left 75 people, including 57 army officers, dead in February 25–26, 2009. Several hundred soldiers that day took up arms against their officers deputed from the army at the Durbar Hall during an annual gathering at the force’s headquarters in Dhaka. Special courts, meanwhile, sentenced 5,926 soldiers to imprisonment for varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases, one filed over the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act, are still pending with court.

Victim families claim that the narrative of a dispute over the disparity in benefits between the officers deputed from the army and soldiers is false and such a narrative was spread to divert attention away from the motives behind the massacre. They also claim that prominent political figures of the Awami League, including the deposed prime minister, conspired with a foreign nation to orchestrate the killing. The victim families have also made the demand for an independent commission to re-investigate the carnage many times in the past. During the Awami League regime, the call for justice and an independent investigation allegedly entailed death threats from some Awami League leaders. Two inquiry committees were formed after the carnage, but neither could identify the motive or the masterminds. None of the reports were made public in their entirety and there is an allegation that the report partially released had been revised three times before its publication. Many border guards, under trial and convicted in legal cases, also levelled allegations of custodial torture. The Awami League regime, however, maintained its partisan narrative that the carnage was the result of a dispute over benefits between officers and soldiers.

The contesting narratives centring on the carnage and the allegations of deprivation and denial of justice by the victim families and sacked and under-trial soldiers are too serious to be left uninvestigated. The carnage left a big wound and only a credible investigation followed by justice can heal the wound. The government should, therefore, form an independent commission for a credible investigation. The authorities should also make all previous reports public in their entirety.​
 

Why body won’t be formed for BDR carnage probe: HC
Staff Correspondent 06 November, 2024, 00:47

1730855185678.png


The High Court on Tuesday asked the interim government to explain why a National Independent Investigation Committee should not be formed to thoroughly investigate the massacre at the then Bangladesh Rifles headquarters in February 25–26, 2009.

The court also directed the government to explain why February 25 should not be officially designated as ‘Shaheed Sena Dibash’ to honor the victims of carnage.

A total of 74 people, including 57 army officers, were killed in the massacre during the Awami League regime of Sheikh Hasina who was deposed through a student-led mass uprising on August 5.

The bench of Justice Farah Mahbub and Justice Debasish Roy Chowdhury issued the ruling in response to a writ petition filed by Supreme Court lawyers Md Tanvir Ahmed and Biplab Kumar Poddar in public interest.

In an interim order, the court instructed the interim government’s home adviser, Lieutenant General (retd) M Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, to resolve within 10 days an application by Tanvir seeking updates on ther forming of an independent commission proposed by himself for the BDR carnage probe.

The court further asked the authorities of the interim government to explain why the inaction of the then government in probing the BDR carnage should not be declared illegal.

Tanvir argued that the 2009 massacre was not a spontaneous revolt but a premeditated attack against the army officers stationed at the then BDR headquarters.

He suggested that a new investigation be conducted, ideally led by a retired Appellate Division judge, to unearth the actual perpetrators and motives behind the incident.

Tanvir further alleged that the massacre was a conspiracy and the then head of the government Sheikh Hasina and her associates were involved in the killing mission.

Tanvir referenced former army chief Moeen U Ahmed, who said in a recent media interview that the true reasons behind the massacre remained undisclosed due to the previous government’s inaction, underscoring the need for transparency and accountability in addressing the national tragedy.

Moeen termed the massacre a ‘preplanned act of murders of our army officers in shooting at a place’ instead of the revolt as described and argued for a thorough and independent probe to bring the actual perpetrators to book.

The Tuesday’s ruling came at a time when the families of the victims of the Bangladesh Rifles, now renamed as Border Guard Bangladesh, and its sacked members has been demanding for establishing a commission to investigate the incident and bring actual perpetrators to justice.

BDR Kalyan Parishad on November 2 put forth the demand.

The victims have also urged the government to reinstate jobs of more than 18,000 sacked members of the force, claiming that they were not offenders.

The victim families termed the earlier legal proceedings a mockery of justice and said that the toppled Awami League government manipulated the investigation of the rebellion.

In the carnage, a group of soldiers took up arms against their officers deputed from the army at the Durbar Hall during an annual gathering at the force’s headquarters in Dhaka.

Special courts, meanwhile, sentenced 5,926 soldiers to imprisonment for varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases, one filed over the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act, are still pending with court.​
 

Families for lodging complaint with ICT to unearth truth of Pilkhana BDR carnage
Staff Correspondent 28 November, 2024, 19:21

1732842002386.png

File photo shows family members of the defence officers, killed during the BDR Mutiny in 2009, pray for the eternal peace of the martyrs at the Military Graveyard in the capital’s Banani on Saturday marking the 14th anniversary of the Pilkhana BDR carnage in 2023. | Sony Ramany

The families of the victims of the 2009 Pilkhana carnage on Thursday announced that they would lodge a complaint to the International Crimes Tribunal against deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and others over the massacre.

Saquib Rahman, son of slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique, came up with the information at a press conference at the Retired Armed Forces Officers’ Welfare Association building in the capital’s Mohakhali, saying that they would submit the complaint within two weeks.

In February 25-26, 2009, carnage at the then BDR headquarters in the capital’s Pilkhana left 57 military officers and 17 civilians killed, including the chief of the BDR, Major General Shakil Ahmed.

Saquib said they would file the complaint against a number of people of the then government, including Sheikh Hasina and the then chiefs of the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence and National Security Intelligence, and others who were involved in the Pilkhana massacre.

Hasina’s former security adviser, Major General (retired) Tarique Ahmed Siddique; former lawmakers Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, Sheikh Selim, and Jahangir Kabir Nanak; and others would also be accused, he added.

Nehreen Ferdousi, wife of slain Colonel Mujibul Hoque, presented six-point demand at the press conference urging the interim government to launch a fresh investigation for the sake of a fair trial and give a progress report regarding the proposed inquiry commission.

The other demands include that all investigation reports related to the tragedy be made public, February 25 be officially recognised as ‘Shaheed Shena Dibash’ through an official gazette before February 2025, and the national flag be flown at half-mast every year on this day, and the 57 brave soldiers who were killed should be given the status of martyrs through an official gazette.

Apart from this, she also demanded that the Pilkhana tragedy should be included in the syllabus of school textbooks, and all innocent people who were arrested should be given speedy release by completing the trial quickly.

Echoing the six-point demand, Rakin Ahmed Bhuiyan, son of Maj Gen Shakil Ahmed and Naznin Ahmed, both of whom were killed during the carnage, accused the then Awami League government of carrying out the massacre and demanded the identification of the mastermind involved behind the scenes.

Victim family members also said that the narrative about a dispute over ‘Operation Dal-Bhat’ leading to the killings is false, saying that it was spread with the intention of diverting attention away from the actual motives behind the killings.

Terming the massacre as planned murder, they said that then top officials of the government and security forces, India and its intelligence agency were involved in the incident.

The fascist Sheikh Hasina killed the 57 army officers, otherwise the Hasina government could not cling to the state power for 15 years, they said.

The victim family members urged the interim government to ensure justice through transparent probe and trial over the incident and bring the mastermind involved with the incident to book.​
 

Pilkhana tragedy: Complaint to be filed with ICT against Hasina, then army, DGFI officers

Saquib Rahman, son of slain Col Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique, today said that they plan to lodge a complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal within two weeks to ensure justice for the "hidden conspirators" and to unearth the "truth" behind the Pilkhana tragedy that took place 15 years ago.

Saquib revealed this information during a press briefing held at RAOWA Hall in Mohakhali, where he spoke on justice for the 74 victims, including 57 officers, who were killed during the Pilkhana massacre, and to mark the day as "Martyrs' Day" for the slain soldiers.

He said that the trial proceedings of the BDR Mutiny case have been pending in the Appellate Division for the past 15 years, and that they were unaware of any recent developments in the case, adding that no one had made any contact throughout this prolonged period.

"We, the victims, have no idea about the status of the case. Then, how will the people of the country know?" he questioned.

"Our plan of action is to lodge a complaint with the International Crimes Tribunal within the next two weeks. We hope the government will ensure the safety of the families of the martyrs, as we lodge complaints against those who were in power during the previous government," Saquib said.

Saquib also named several people, including Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, Sheikh Fazlul Karim, Jahangir Kabir Nanak, and Mirza Azam, in connection with the incident.

He suggested that Sheikh Hasina could be held accountable under the "Doctrine of Superior/Command Responsibility" as per international law, as she was the head of the defence ministry at the time.

"We'll lodge a complaint against her, the then army officers, and especially the DGFI officers," he said.

Saquib also hinted at lodging complaints against journalists who misinterpreted the incident.

Meanwhile, Rakin Ahmed, the son of Maj Gen Shakil Ahmed, demanded that those responsible for the Pilkhana massacre be brought to justice following a thorough investigation.

Rakin also called for the declaration of Pilkhana Massacre Day as Martyrs' Day, stating, "If the perpetrators are punished, all the people of the country will stand by us. Specific measures must be taken for those who were removed from their jobs for seeking justice for the killings."

Nahrin Ferdousi, wife of slain Col Mujibul Haque, also made several demands during the press briefing.

These included the declaration of February 25 as Martyr Army Day through a gazette before February 2025, the lowering of the national flag to half-mast on that day across the country, the renewal of investigations into the Pilkhana killings, the provision of updates to the victims of the Pilkhana tragedy regarding the progress of the proposed inquiry commission, and the release of all investigation reports to the public.

She called for the 57 slain army officers to be honoured as "martyrs", the inclusion of the Pilkhana tragedy in school textbooks, and the ensuring of justice for all those innocent individuals arrested in connection with the case, following the disposal of the case.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred Bangladesh Rifles (now BGB) personnel staged an armed revolt at the Darbar Hall of the force's Pilkhana headquarters during the three-day "BDR Week".

A total of 74 people, including 57 army officers, were killed before the mutiny ended the following day.​
 

Latest Posts

Back