[🇧🇩] - BRICS---Can Developing Countries Including Bangladesh Benefit From It? | Page 2 | World Defense Forum
Reply
PK Defense Logo

Uniting Nations Through Defense and Political Dialogue

Defending Freedom of Expression!

[🇧🇩] BRICS---Can Developing Countries Including Bangladesh Benefit From It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saif
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 22
  • Views Views 622
G Bangladesh Defense Forum

BRICS' potential for changing global economic order
Nilratan Halder
Published :
Jan 09, 2025 22:36
Updated :
Jan 09, 2025 22:36

1736470128119.png


With Indonesia joining the BRICS, a platform looking for strengthening South-South Cooperation and setting into motion a new world order, it now accounts for 40 per cent of the world population and 35 per cent of the global gross domestic product (GDP). Indonesia becomes the 10th member of the intergovernmental organisation comprising six of the 10 most populous countries on the planet. India and China lead the table with more than 1.4 billion inhabitants each. If Thailand and Malaysia which have shown their interest in joining the bloc become full members, the population size of the BRICS will be 4.032 billion nearly half the world population. Their GDP will also inch towards the 40 per cent mark.

Now that the BRICS has grown in influence and financial status, it is a matter of time more emerging countries will clamour for membership. Given the monopoly of dollar in international trade and currency exchange, particularly the financial woes suffered by poor and developing nations like Bangladesh, there is every chance of such nations participating in the de-dollarising initiative and setting an alternative economic order. Costlier dollar in the post pandemic time followed by the disruptive period of international trade due to the Russia-Ukraine war has made them realise the bitter truth of relying on an apex single currency for exchange.

With the most populous countries also emerging as the leading financial powerhouses by 2050, the centre of gravity of the world economy is sure to shift. Therefore, an initiative to give a shape to the transition had to be taken in all seriousness. Thus comes the BRICS into being. China is still trailing US so far as their economic sizes are concerned but some of the variables are in favour of not only the Asian emerging giant but also India is poised to become the third largest economy behind the US and China by the middle of the century.

The potential of the BRICS in the process of expansion is great and if attained even 70-75 per cent of the promises, it could more than challenge the G7 bloc. The five founding members of the BRICS, according to the IMF data, had 33.76 per cent of the global GDP (in purchasing power parity terms) in October last. This share is against the 29.08 per cent GDP (PPP) of the G7 nations. The main contributor to the BRICS' higher GDP is China which has become the world's largest economy if measured by purchasing power parity. Its share in the global GDP is 19.1 per cent in PPP terms and around 18 per cent in nominal terms. The US, on the other hand, had 26 per cent of the global GDP in nominal terms but only 15.0 per cent in PPP terms in 2024.

Although India is the fifth largest economy in the world, in PPP terms it has long been ranked the third. More interestingly, apart from China and India, no other major economy has managed to expand their share for over a decade. For an example, in 2010, the USA's share in the global economy was 17.2 per cent but in 2024, it has declined to 15 per cent (PPP). India has raised its contribution from 6.0 per cent in 2014 to 8.2 per cent in 2024. Its contribution in PPP terms is two and a half times that of Germany, the third ranked economy in nominal terms. So the two most populous countries are still on what can be termed modest to robust growth trajectories.

That is likely to be the clinching factors for the BRICS when it comes to establishment of an alternative monetary and financial system if not a multi-dimensional economic order. Now what are the driving forces behind this economic performance by the world's two most populous countries? It is the manufacturing and productive capacities. BRICS members and its likely partners enjoy a lead in producing key commodities like cereals, fish and meat, oil seeds, crude oil, natural gas and minerals such as iron ore, copper and nickel. BRICS nations have a clear edge in producing the primary crops. Together Brazil, India and China produce two-thirds of the global sugarcane output. China and Brazil have 30 per cent share in the global maize production. Then China and India are the producers of half of the world's rice.

With Indonesia's entry into the bloc, the share of palm oil receives a boost. The country is the world's largest exporter of palm oil with 54 per cent share. If Malaysia and Thailand join the organisation, their production of this oil will be 90 per cent of the global total. In terms of production of another important crop potato, China and India have 40 per cent of the global share. In the production of fish, China and India have a lead. Similarly, in meat --- from beef to pork to chicken---production, Brazil, China and India have a share between 20-40 per cent of the global output. China and India are also leading producers of chicken eggs with China alone producing 34 per cent of the global total.

Thus the organisation has both raw materials and industrial capability along with agricultural support required for spurring economic growth. China has proved its technological muscle so has India in some of the select and advanced technology. With Russian advanced scientific and cutting-edge technological backup, the organisation can indeed establish a new global economic order.

Last but not least, Bangladesh, unfortunately, was not considered for membership although it was invited as an observer. It was surprising given the publicity of the Hasina government. Although six countries on the last day of the Johannesburg summit were invited to join the group, Bangladesh was not.​
 

BRICS' potential for changing global economic order
Nilratan Halder
Published :
Jan 09, 2025 22:36
Updated :
Jan 09, 2025 22:36

View attachment 12842

With Indonesia joining the BRICS, a platform looking for strengthening South-South Cooperation and setting into motion a new world order, it now accounts for 40 per cent of the world population and 35 per cent of the global gross domestic product (GDP). Indonesia becomes the 10th member of the intergovernmental organisation comprising six of the 10 most populous countries on the planet. India and China lead the table with more than 1.4 billion inhabitants each. If Thailand and Malaysia which have shown their interest in joining the bloc become full members, the population size of the BRICS will be 4.032 billion nearly half the world population. Their GDP will also inch towards the 40 per cent mark.

Now that the BRICS has grown in influence and financial status, it is a matter of time more emerging countries will clamour for membership. Given the monopoly of dollar in international trade and currency exchange, particularly the financial woes suffered by poor and developing nations like Bangladesh, there is every chance of such nations participating in the de-dollarising initiative and setting an alternative economic order. Costlier dollar in the post pandemic time followed by the disruptive period of international trade due to the Russia-Ukraine war has made them realise the bitter truth of relying on an apex single currency for exchange.

With the most populous countries also emerging as the leading financial powerhouses by 2050, the centre of gravity of the world economy is sure to shift. Therefore, an initiative to give a shape to the transition had to be taken in all seriousness. Thus comes the BRICS into being. China is still trailing US so far as their economic sizes are concerned but some of the variables are in favour of not only the Asian emerging giant but also India is poised to become the third largest economy behind the US and China by the middle of the century.

The potential of the BRICS in the process of expansion is great and if attained even 70-75 per cent of the promises, it could more than challenge the G7 bloc. The five founding members of the BRICS, according to the IMF data, had 33.76 per cent of the global GDP (in purchasing power parity terms) in October last. This share is against the 29.08 per cent GDP (PPP) of the G7 nations. The main contributor to the BRICS' higher GDP is China which has become the world's largest economy if measured by purchasing power parity. Its share in the global GDP is 19.1 per cent in PPP terms and around 18 per cent in nominal terms. The US, on the other hand, had 26 per cent of the global GDP in nominal terms but only 15.0 per cent in PPP terms in 2024.

Although India is the fifth largest economy in the world, in PPP terms it has long been ranked the third. More interestingly, apart from China and India, no other major economy has managed to expand their share for over a decade. For an example, in 2010, the USA's share in the global economy was 17.2 per cent but in 2024, it has declined to 15 per cent (PPP). India has raised its contribution from 6.0 per cent in 2014 to 8.2 per cent in 2024. Its contribution in PPP terms is two and a half times that of Germany, the third ranked economy in nominal terms. So the two most populous countries are still on what can be termed modest to robust growth trajectories.

That is likely to be the clinching factors for the BRICS when it comes to establishment of an alternative monetary and financial system if not a multi-dimensional economic order. Now what are the driving forces behind this economic performance by the world's two most populous countries? It is the manufacturing and productive capacities. BRICS members and its likely partners enjoy a lead in producing key commodities like cereals, fish and meat, oil seeds, crude oil, natural gas and minerals such as iron ore, copper and nickel. BRICS nations have a clear edge in producing the primary crops. Together Brazil, India and China produce two-thirds of the global sugarcane output. China and Brazil have 30 per cent share in the global maize production. Then China and India are the producers of half of the world's rice.

With Indonesia's entry into the bloc, the share of palm oil receives a boost. The country is the world's largest exporter of palm oil with 54 per cent share. If Malaysia and Thailand join the organisation, their production of this oil will be 90 per cent of the global total. In terms of production of another important crop potato, China and India have 40 per cent of the global share. In the production of fish, China and India have a lead. Similarly, in meat --- from beef to pork to chicken---production, Brazil, China and India have a share between 20-40 per cent of the global output. China and India are also leading producers of chicken eggs with China alone producing 34 per cent of the global total.

Thus the organisation has both raw materials and industrial capability along with agricultural support required for spurring economic growth. China has proved its technological muscle so has India in some of the select and advanced technology. With Russian advanced scientific and cutting-edge technological backup, the organisation can indeed establish a new global economic order.

Last but not least, Bangladesh, unfortunately, was not considered for membership although it was invited as an observer. It was surprising given the publicity of the Hasina government. Although six countries on the last day of the Johannesburg summit were invited to join the group, Bangladesh was not.​

UN is racist. It has not allowed any new member to get entry into P5. There is no possibility that the voice of any small nation may be heard. All those countries of P5 and their puppet west is losing their importance very fast. There is an urgent need for a new platform which is inclusive, fair and representative. Global south is emerging. Downfall of west and rise of global south under the leadership of India is inevitable. BRICS has the country like Russia, India, China who has a great potential to offer so many things which caters the need of emerging nations unlike west who wants to impose the things what they have on these emerging nations. More and more participation in BRICS is the need of hour to challenge the hegemony and exploitation of west.
 
Mostly zabardasti countries ki groupings, the UN is dysfunctional AF

What good will a much smaller grouping of not-the-richest countries ka gang do ? Internal conflict bhi hai with 2 of the biggest here, India and China.

China and Rus have problems with the west, with whom there will need to be at least a degree of inter operability.

SAARC type fuss sa lag raha scene :LOL:
 

Bangladesh yet to benefit from BRICS bank
FHM Humayan Kabir
Published :
Jan 18, 2025 23:57
Updated :
Jan 18, 2025 23:57

1737245788577.png


Bangladesh has so far failed to reap any benefits of the BRICS-led New Development Bank (NDB) despite its entry into the new multilateral lender more than three years ago in 2021.

The NDB has still to approve any loan for Bangladesh other than that for five founding members-Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS), insiders said on Saturday.

In September 2021, the board of the Shanghai-based lender welcomed Bangladesh as its sixth member.

Insiders said Bangladesh has taken a cautious approach to acquire loans from the NDB, formerly BRICS Development Bank, as those are costly compared to other typical lenders of the country.

Following its accession, Bangladesh sought loans from the NDB to finance building some infrastructure and facilitate socio-economic development.

In the meantime, a high-level delegation from the NDB also visited Bangladesh in January 2024. Dhaka requested it to expedite the loan approval process.

But the lender has taken a delaying tactic to approve the loan for Bangladesh, said government officials involved in communications with the NDB.

However, the NDB's Corporate Communications Division told the FE that they are on track to help Bangladesh.

"NDB is fully committed to working closely with Bangladesh, supporting infrastructure and sustainable development projects in alignment with its national development objectives and commitments under SDGs," said the NDB through an email communication last Friday.

During last year's meeting with NDB vice-president and COO Vladimir Kazbekov, the lender informed Dhaka that it was looking to lend money equivalent to $1.0 billion per year for large-scale projects in Bangladesh and about $3.5-$5.0 billion during the 2022-2026 work plan period.

Earlier, Bangladesh sought financial assistance for different projects, including five bridges, at an estimated cost of $8.87 billion.

The NDB has so far approved concept papers of four projects-three for the public sector and one for a private commercial bank-at least a year ago.

It endorsed a $320-million loan for a Dhaka Wasa project in August 2023, $100 million for a DNCC project in December 2023 and $442 million for Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company in February 2024.

Besides, the NDB approved another $25-million loan for the private commercial bank-City Bank PLC-in April 2024.

"We're waiting for approval of at least two quick loans from the NDB board. We're also ready to sign the loan deals," said a senior official of the Economic Relations Division (ERD).

A DWASA official said they were waiting for the approval of the NDB loan with an eye to improving Dhaka's water supply system with the proposed project.

Following its birth, the NDB agreed to finance infrastructure projects in member countries worth a cumulatively loan of $35 billion for about 100 projects, NDB president Dilma Rousseff told a programme last year.

A couple of finance ministry officials said the government was going slowly with the proposed NDB loans as those are comparatively costly.

The FE analysis has found that the NDB's maturity is a maximum of 19 years along with five years' grace period.

The lender charges six-month LIBOR/SOFR plus spread ranging from 1.03 per cent to 1.35 per cent for borrowing its loans.

Besides, it charges 0.25-per cent front-end fee for approved loans while 0.25-per cent commitment fee for an undisbursed amount of the credit after approval.

The Bangladesh government also borrows costly loans from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which covers a market-based (SOFR) one.

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New Your, the SOFR rate was 4.92974 per cent on Saturday.

In a query, the NDB replied that it was mobilising resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in BRICS and other emerging market economies and developing countries.

In line with NDB's commitment to transparency and information disclosure, the bank is publishing information about proposed projects on its official website, added the Corporate Communications Division of the NDB.

"For example, NDB is considering advancing a loan of USD 25 million to City Bank Plc, one of the largest commercial banks in Bangladesh. The funds will be on-lent to private sector for investments in sustainable infrastructure projects in clean energy and energy efficiency, transport and digital infrastructure."

"The project is at an advanced stage of preparation, with approval targeted within the first half of 2025," it said.

When Bangladesh formally acceded to NDB, it actually joined with a larger subscription of $942 million (1.84 per cent of the total) and received 1.88 per cent of exercisable votes on the two boards of the bank.​
 
BD definitely should pursue BRICS membership along with ASEAN.

BD needs to be present in as many forum as possible to increase our global exposure.

I have to be honest it is unlikely BRICS will introduce its own currency… the countries are very different and have do not really think in short term there is much benefit in it.

BD is part of BRICS Bank, we should explore cheap loans from it if feasible.

Your points are well taken, but getting too involved in BRICS activity - especially concerning de-dollarization, will prove to be very detrimental to Bangladesh Exports to the USA, which is one of our primary apparel markets.

Trump has threatened "friend" Modi that any further pursual of de-dollarization by India will invite an imposition of 100% tariffs on Indian exports to the US. Bangladesh certainly does not want to be in that boat.

All other points made are reasonable and those avenues can be explored.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back