[🇧🇩] Budget For 2026-2027

[🇧🇩] Budget For 2026-2027
89
980
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Delivering the promises

Sabbir Ahmad

Published :
Jun 26, 2026 00:57
Updated :
Jun 26, 2026 00:57

1782431299957.webp


On the morning after the budget, Salma Begum unlocked her small grocery shop in Jatrabari as the radio replayed fragments of the finance minister's speech. She paid little attention to the headline figure. Instead, her focus remained on the price of a litre of soybean oil, her son's college fees, and the interest on a loan for her small business, all far removed from the trillions discussed in Parliament. Like her, most citizens see a budget not as what is announced in Parliament but as what it means at a shop counter, a classroom, and a hospital bed over the next twelve months. Since the speech, as economists and business chambers scrutinised the fine print, the conversation has rightly shifted from the size of the promise to how to keep it.

GRAND AMBITION, HARD ARITHMETIC: The FY2026-27 budget, presented on June 11 by the finance minister, is the largest in Bangladesh's history. At Tk 9.38 trillion (lakh crore), or 13.7 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), it represents a 19 per cent expansion over the revised budget of the previous year. On the road to a trillion-dollar economy by 2034, it sets an optimistic target of 6.5 per cent GDP growth and 7.5 per cent inflation.

The heart of this historic blueprint is unmistakably people-centric. Education spending is surging to Tk 1.36 trillion (roughly 2 per cent of GDP), while health funding nearly doubles to Tk 694.09 billion. The social safety net expands to Tk 1.44 trillion, anchored by a flagship Family Card paying Tk 2,500 a month to 4.10 million women-headed households. For ordinary consumers, withholding tax on sixty essential commodities, from rice and edible oil to onions and sugar, falls from up to 5 per cent down to a uniform 0.5 per cent, while the tax-free income threshold climbs to Tk 375,000. These macro choices speak directly to Salma Begum's needs at that shop counter.

Ambition, however, must be matched by arithmetic. In its June 12 review, the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) noted that the 6.5 per cent growth target contrasts with a provisional growth rate of only 4.14 per cent. Reaching that goal would require domestic investment to become far more productive quickly. The bigger challenge is private investment. The budget projects only a slight rise, from 21.2 per cent to 21.3 per cent of GDP, but even that modest increase would require an additional Tk 1.65 trillion in private capital. With private-sector credit growing at just 4.75 per cent against a 9.4 per cent target, the gap between ambition and reality is clear. This may not be a fatal flaw in the budget but highlights where the delivery plan must be strongest.

EARNING THROUGH SUSTAINABLE REFORM: The single most consequential number in the budget is the revenue target. The National Board of Revenue (NBR) must collect Tk 6.04 trillion. Given that collections previously hovered around Tk 3.69 trillion and are tracking towards roughly Tk 4.0 trillion this cycle, the state must find an extra Tk 2.0 trillion in 12 months.

Tax professionals are clear about the challenge. One expert noted that sources of this incremental revenue remain unclear. Bangladesh has about 12.8 million registered taxpayers, but only about 4 million file income tax returns. The credible path forward cannot involve squeezing the same compliant shops or salaried workers harder. That would deepen the unfairness people like Salma Begum already feel. Instead, the NBR must pull the untaxed economy into the net. Scaling up quarterly online VAT returns, expanding digital invoicing, and tightening mandatory identification linked to bank accounts are ways to do this.

The budget's most contested provision deserves an honest word. The decision to allow undisclosed income tied to land and flat transactions to be regularised has been defended by NBR. They see it as a narrow disclosure mechanism to address distorted property records, not a blanket amnesty. A credible revenue strategy must treat these schemes as a one-time correction of property valuation records, not a recurring habit.

THE EXECUTION GAP: If raising funds is the steepest hill, spending them efficiently is the most critical test. This is where the finance minister's candour is refreshing. He openly acknowledged that development spending in the first ten months reached a dismal 40.7 per cent of the program, an admission rarely made in a budget speech.

This gridlock repeats at the top. Of the 20 flagship mega-projects holding nearly a fifth of the development budget, none are expected to finish on schedule. Rooppur is at 68.3 per cent completion after nearly a decade, while a vital metro line is at 5.8 per cent after six years. Even more telling, the number of projects with a 'token allocation' of a lakh taka or less has climbed to 77. This indicates that the project pipeline is cluttered with entries that lack genuine financial commitment for the current cycle.

The remedy is not more money but more discipline. It points to a clear direction: fewer projects finished faster. Spreading a Tk 3 trillion development programme across more than a thousand projects virtually guarantees slow progress. Instead, concentrating those funds on works ready with land or resources acquired and designs finalised would better stimulate the economy.

The deeper fix is to pay for outcomes rather than invoices. Each disbursement should be tied directly to a functioning clinic, a trained teacher, or a completed section of road, all of which are verified and recorded digitally. India offers a working template for the "Direct Benefit Transfer" system, which routes welfare straight into bank accounts, saving documented Rs 3.48 trillion by eliminating leakages and ghost beneficiaries. Bangladesh's own Farmer Card initiatives reach 4.1 million women and 4.25 million marginal farmers via mobile banking. Built on this digital logic, these targeted programmes could become the most efficient use of money this state has ever made.

FINANCING WITHOUT A SAFETY NET: One vital feature of this budget has drawn less attention than it deserves: the government intends to finance a Tk 2.43 trillion deficit, 3.6 per cent of GDP, by relying on roughly $11 billion in foreign assistance. Notably, it plans to do this without an IMF programme. This is a bold statement of confidence. It carries real advantages, sparing the country a fresh round of externally imposed austerity conditions.

But walking away from the fund also removes a crucial cushion. Financing this layout relies heavily on foreign borrowing of Tk 1.55 trillion. Much of this is concessional. This approach limits domestic bank borrowing to Tk 1.12 trillion. Such restraint may leave vital banking liquidity for factory owners in Narayanganj or software founders in Banani. But concessional dollars arrive on the lender's timetable, not ours. By forgoing an IMF backstop, our internal delivery plan must remain flawless.

Health services, education stipends, and safety-net disbursements must be ring-fenced as untouchable regardless of the quarter. These are the lines that reach Salma Begum's family directly.

Physical infrastructure, by contrast, can breathe: works nearing completion that unlock immediate returns receive funding first, while long-term projects can be paced against actual quarterly revenue collections. The Tk 600 billion stimulus package, with its 6 per cent interest subsidy and promise of 2.50 million jobs, can powerfully amplify this momentum. However, it will only succeed if credit flows through the banking sector on pure commercial merit rather than political connection. This is not a retreat; it is the discipline required to protect the budget's promises from the risks that underlie them.

For Salma Begum, success will not be measured in trillions or lakh crores. It will be measured by the real-world cost of restocking her shelves, the quality of her son's education, and the actual affordability of credit to expand her business. The FY27 budget provides the government with both the resources and the mandate to address these ground realities. What the state must now ensure is the unforgiving standard of execution: honest targets, digital pipelines, finished projects, and the courage to prioritise. If it succeeds, this budget will be remembered not only as the largest in our nation's history, but as the one that finally taught us how to deliver.

Dr Sabbir Ahmad is an engineering and corporate leader with extensive global experience in digital connectivity, energy infrastructure, and sustainable development.​
 

FY2026-27 budget targets: A bridge too far?

Mustafizur Rahman

1782432165660.webp

FILE VISUAL: REHNUMA PROSHOON

In the budget for FY2026-27, the finance minister has proposed several important departures and new measures that deserve both attention and appreciation. These include some significant changes or initiatives in fiscal policies and measures, attempts to reset allocative priorities, and deregulation in several areas. The proposed budget has significantly increased allocations for health, education, and social safety nets, and set out plans to roll out targeted measures to stimulate investment and improve ease of doing business.

The above is reflected in measures to rationalise VAT and import duties, convert taxes deducted at source into advance income tax to be subsequently adjusted with payable taxes, widen the remit of bonded warehouse facilities and use of bank instruments to cover most export-oriented sectors, and calibrate import duties on intermediate and finished goods in support of import-substituting and export-oriented industries. Several measures have been proposed to encourage innovation, incentivise the creative economy, encourage youth-led entrepreneurship, and promote investment in IT-enabled services.

Whether these measures and signals would translate into real investment, supply-side response, job creation, lowering of the inflation rate, and attaining the government’s aspiration to graduate to a welfare state built on high economic growth, social inclusiveness, and environment-friendly development process remains to be seen. Much will hinge on the implementation of the budgetary proposals and their delivery to produce expected outcomes. This is where the policymakers are likely to face formidable challenges, originating both from within the budgetary framework and from institutional factors.

To illustrate this point, one of the budget’s key weaknesses concerns the FY2025-26 benchmarks against which the FY2026-27 targets have been set. Several instances may be cited in this connection. For example, while the BBS projection of GDP growth for the outgoing FY2025-26 is 4.14 percent, the corresponding figure cited in the budget is 5 percent. So to reach the target of 6.5 percent planned for FY2026-27, GDP will have to actually grow by 2.4 percentage points, and not 1.5 percentage points as envisaged in the budget. Similarly, revenue income for FY2025-26 has been estimated at Tk 5,88,000 crore, but the actual figure for the July-April period of FY2025-26 is only about Tk 3,27,000 crore. This will necessitate a 221 percent rise in revenue collection during the last two months of May and June 2026 compared to the corresponding two months of FY2024-25.

Thus, if the FY2026-27 revenue generation target is to be attained, the growth of revenue must be higher than the 18 percent mentioned in the budget speech. The growth rate will need to be perhaps as high as 35 to 40 percent, a formidable task by any count.

Moreover, BBS figures show that the average inflation rate for the July-May period of FY2025-26 was 8.63 percent. However, the budget mentions a relatively lower average inflation rate for the year: 7 percent. Although export growth for July-April, FY2025-26 is negative, at -2.5 percent, the budget envisages a growth rate of 9 percent in FY2025-26! Indeed, exports will have to grow by an impossible 155 percent in June compared to the previous year if the growth mentioned in the budget is to be attained in FY2025-26. The projection of remittance flows is also quite surprising. During the first 11 months of FY2025-26, $32.76 billion remittance has been received—a 19 percent growth over FY2024-25, averaging almost $3.0 billion each month. Yet, the budget’s projection for FY2025-26 is only 10.1 percent growth from the $30.328 billion of remittance received in FY2024-25. This would mean remittances in June 2026 would be a meagre $0.6 billion when in June 2025 the amount was $2.8 billion, or a negative growth of 78.6 percent.

These misalignments of key performance indicators for FY2025-26, used as reference points for designing the FY2026-27 budget, call into question the veracity and soundness of the performance targets set out for the upcoming fiscal year. The newly elected government had a reason and an opportunity to depart from this budget tradition often followed by previous political governments, too. BNP was at the helm of power only during the fourth quarter of FY2025-26 (March-June, 2026) and didn’t have control over attaining the FY2025-26 budget targets. As such, a more realistic baseline would have allowed it to set more attainable macroeconomic targets, but the government didn’t choose to take advantage of this opportunity.

As noted before, the quality of budget implementation will determine whether investment is stimulated, inflation is reduced, and new jobs are created as planned. Here, three factors would be crucial: (a) institutional capacity to deliver the budgetary targets, (b) quality of macroeconomic management, and (c) good governance and accountability in all spheres of budget implementation.

Reduction of import duties and waiver of VAT and advance income tax on many items would no doubt have revenue implications. Against this backdrop, full-scale digitalisation, based on interoperable and integrated systems, should be implemented to attain the high revenue mobilisation target of Tk 6,95,000 crore. Many countries have established a QR-based and cashless system of transactions, which Bangladesh should adopt if the tax base is to be broadened and income and expenditure statements are to be reconciled.

While astute budgetary proposals, resource allocations, and fiscal measures are necessary, they are not sufficient for implementation to produce the expected results. For that, a conducive business environment, broader macroeconomic management, and institutional capacity to implement the proposals and measures are required.

Concerned institutions, therefore, must have the capacity to manage resources, ensure allocative efficiency, and attain expected outcomes and impacts. For example, the education and health sectors have been allocated significantly higher allocations in the FY2026-27 budget compared to any time in the past. This is justified. However, experience shows that these sectors have previously struggled to spend even much lower allocations. Thus, the ability to spend the newly allocated resources by ensuring good value for money is a must to achieve the education and health sector-related outcomes on the ground.

Close involvement of local communities and service-receivers in implementing the social safety net programmes, including the Family Cards and Farmers Cards; transparency and accountability in resource utilisation; and an effective system of grievance redressal are necessary to implement these programmes effectively. A welcome initiative in this context is the budget’s promise to set up digital platforms and dashboards for monitoring progress and redressing grievances.

Curtailing inflation will depend, to a large extent, on stimulating supply-side response through higher investment. But of no less importance will be the quality of market management. Overseeing, monitoring, and managing the various players operating between customs points and retail points, and between farm gate and consumers, will be crucial. Public institutions tasked with these responsibilities will need to play a proactive role here.

There is hope that the government will employ its best effort to ensure that the allocated money is actually spent on the ground. In case revenue mobilisation cannot reach the very high growth target set in the budget, the government might be compelled to borrow more than it was envisaged in the budget. Higher domestic borrowings could crowd out the private sector. Higher foreign borrowings are already creating a pressure of increased external debt servicing obligations in the budget. Already, a significant amount of money is being allocated in the budget against repayment of domestic and external debt; this amount is expected to rise over the near-term future. The debt situation should be kept under active monitoring and periodic review to reduce the attendant risks of falling into the dreaded debt trap.

In the 1977 film titled A Bridge Too Far, directed by Sir Richard Attenborough, the heroic objectives of the Allied mission could not be achieved because of delays, coordination failure, and unexpected resistance. One hopes that the present government will rise to the occasion and confront prevailing formidable challenges successfully to accomplish the mission, get to the bridge, and attain the lofty goals set out in the FY2026-27 budget.

Professor Mustafizur Rahman is distinguished fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).​
 

Latest Posts

Back