[🇧🇩] Extradition of Hasina, Awami Leaders/Beneficiaries and Related News.

[Vsdoc]

well in short

1. those who wanted to make pakistan satyed back in India

2. the ones who were biggest champions of doing ground work and agitation of pakistan are the biggest victims ..... then be it

a) punjabi christains who marked rich hindu properties for muslim mobs are now most hunted and abused religious minority in Pakistan

b) Ahemdies did all the beurocratic work so that hindu& sikh majority Lahore and surrounding area comes into pakistan and look at there situation in pakistan today they are not even considerred muslims

c) it was Bengali muslims which started masacrre or Hindus in calcutta of 14-8-1946 and later Rajshai and noakhali and later rest of EAST BENGAL to raise the deamnd of Pakistan and what did they get in 1970 at hands of Bihari Muslim and Razakar armies and West Pakistani army

d) Shia muslims of UP and all urdu speaking muslims that voted almost 90% in favour of making of pakistan in 1946 are sitill called MOHAJIRS and hated by Punjabies , Balouchies and Pakhtoons alike

3. Those ruling Pakistan have no sense of love or responsibility towars either the population or the land or even the state they just want to loot and scoot and its been going on since inception

4. biggest problem for bangladesh is they are clueless and more importantly dont know the real objective of there main opposition with India

5. the main cash industry of bangladesh was garment manfacturing and no all that has come back to India and rest gone to vietnam and sri lanka


and no matter how much they want India will now never own Bangladesh like before

anything else ... cheers doc

This is a good summary Guru.

I still maintain that even historically, the Bengali Muslim population was more vicious than the Punjabi and Sindhi Muslims.

Also, the posh Bengali Hindu population was simply not up to the task.

 

[Vsdoc]

Also, if you see Pakistani Punjabis and Indian Punjabis, they are quite obviously the same people.

But if you see our Bengalis and you see Bangladeshis, there is a distinct difference in looks, features, morphology, anthropological differences.

I put Joe on the spot once (offline) about it, and after squirming for a bit (quite a lot, verbosity etc.) he attempted to school me in the differences.

There are basically 3 distinct type of Bangladeshis, and none of the 3 are similar to Bengalis, save for the language (even there the dialects are totally distinct).

So its not just a matter if conversion here as with the Punjab side.

I think there waa a deeper pre-existing socio-cultural, even racial/ethnic divide, where on which was superimposed the Hindu caste structure.

@Krishna with Flute
@Guru Dutt
@Bagheera0084
@Dogun18
@Mainerik
@Egyptian
@Lulldapull
@VCheng
@Saif
@Bilal9
@ThunderCat
@ghazi
@Ghazi52
@PakistanProud
@RayKalm

 

[Guru Dutt]

Also, if you see Pakistani Punjabis and Indian Punjabis, they are quite obviously the same people.

But if tou see our Bengalis and you see Bangladeshis, there is a distinct difference in looks, features, morphology, anthropological differences.

I put Joe on the spot once (offline) about it, and after squirming for a bit (quite a lot, verbosity etc.) he attempted to school me in the differences.

There are basically 3 distinct type of Bangladeshis, and none of the 3 are similar to Bengalis, save for the language (even there the dialects are totally distinct).

So its not just a matter if conversion here as with the Punjab side.

I think there waa a deeper pre-existing socio-cultural, even racial/ethnic divide, where on which was superimposed the Hindu caste structure.

@Krishna with Flute
@Guru Dutt
@Bagheera0084
@Dogun18
@Mainerik
@Egyptian
@Lulldapull
@VCheng
@Saif
@Bilal9
@ThunderCat
@ghazi
@Ghazi52
@PakistanProud
@RayKalm

well Doc thing is

1. There are three levels of Bengalies or there were three levels of Bengali hindus in united british east and west bengal

a)feudal & rich hindu Jamindars who were basically Thakurs and a very few of them Brahmins and were less than 1-2% of united british bengals hindu population

b) educated bhramin and mixed bhrmo smaji and bengali kayasta and baniya hidus and some middle class educated christians mostly converted bengalies and biharies they had almost 20-24% in hindu population in united bengal
c) this had almost 75% of the hindu bengali population and were mostly lower caste and were farmers and landless labourers and fishermen or those working in industrial units in urban areas while others doing odd jobs in and around urban areas

combined population of Hindus in undivided bengal was almost 62% which after three british made famines and partition related riots came down to almost 49% of which 40% was in west bengal and rest in east pakistan or bangladesh or east bengal of british india


as for Punjabi or bengali or Urdu speaking or even Irani well a Muslim once he is close to 50% of population in a non muslim majority nation he will start massacrre of so called KAFIRs then be it undivided Punjab or Bengal or sindh or Kashmir or for that matter any part of the world ......

. there is either DAR UL IMAN or DAR UL HARAB .... either you are a Muslim or you are a Kafir and there is only two choices for Kafir in a musim ruled nation

1. convert
2.go away or get killed


that is what hapenned in persia 1100 years ago or 1000 years ago in Afghanistan or to Hindus in 1947 in east or west pakistan or in 1970-71 to hindu bengalies and now they will get the same treatment or are getting the same treatment in bangladesh ....... its faliure of indians that we are keeping these bangladeshi and rohingyas muslims in india

 

[Vsdoc]

combined population of Hindus in undivided bengal was almost 62% which after three british made famines and partition related riots came down to almost 49% of which 40% was in west bengal and rest in east pakistan or bangladesh or east bengal of british india

Why did more Hindus than Muslims (compared to their overall population share figure) die in the Bengal famines?

 

[Guru Dutt]

Why did more Hindus than Muslims (compared to their overall population share figure) die in the Bengal famines?

well i m not from bengal so cant tell more on that but basic reason was most muslims in those areas survived on fish and other meat while most hindus even in bengal were either too poor or were vegtarians or were in urban centers where they dint had easy acess to fishries which muslims living on on coastal areas and on riversides had

 

[Vsdoc]

well i m not from bengal so cant tell more on that but basic reason was most muslims in those areas survived on fish and other meat while most hindus even in bengal were either too poor or were vegtarians or were in urban centers where they dint had easy acess to fishries which muslims living on on coastal areas and on riversides had

I have seen more vegetarian Parsis than vegetarian Bengalis (none, actually).

Never met a Bengali who does not eat fish. And most of the Bengalis I know are Brahmin.

 

[Guru Dutt]

I have seen more vegetarian Parsis than vegetarian Bengalis (none, actually).

Never met a Bengali who does not eat fish. And most of the Bengalis I know are Brahmin.

well there are bengali vegetarian's and yes in bhrami's aswell

and while most bengali's specially bharims were most numerous througut India as they were in British beurcracy first as British empire came to bengal first so did bengali bhramis were firt to get british education and then all jobs related to it that is why you meet mostly bengali bhramin 's wuth sirnames like DASS, MITRA, SEN, BENREJI, CHATERJI,ChAKWARTI, GANGULY, BHADURI, BHAGCHI,BHATTACHARYA, ACHARYA

 

[Sharma Ji]

BHADURI

I thought they were jaats or something, Haryanay side se.

or maybe BhidUri are an altogether different group.