Thankfully for you it does not matter either way.
- Thread starter Saif
- Start date
- Replies 108
- Views 871
Bangladesh Defense ForumThankfully for you it does not matter either way.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #92
Aftermath of Sheikh Hasina’s extradition request
THE Bangladesh government lodging a formal request to extradite its former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, through a diplomatic note verbale dated December 23, 2024, is a welcome step...
www.newagebd.net
Aftermath of Sheikh Hasina’s extradition request
by Quazi Omar Foysal 27 December, 2024, 00:00
New Age/Mehedi Haque
THE Bangladesh government lodging a formal request to extradite its former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, through a diplomatic note verbale dated December 23, 2024, is a welcome step towards addressing the allegations of human rights violations and international crimes during the fifteen-year-long tenure of the previous government. The extradition request is based on the 2013 Bangladesh-India Extradition Treaty (amended in 2016). This treaty was concluded during Hasina’s regime and binds both states under international law. As of now, India’s response to the note verbale has been limited to an acknowledgement of receipt. Bangladesh has subsequently revealed that it will remind India of the request but has not specified a timeline.
This decision by the government marks a clear departure from its earlier stance. On October 30, 2024, it had stated that it would request Sheikh Hasina’s extradition from India only after a successful trial outcome. This author has previously argued (New Age, November 9, 2024) that such an approach could potentially undermine the prospect of the extradition process itself. However, as the chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal-Bangladesh, ICT-BD, has rightly pointed out, the successful extradition of Hasina could pave the way for a more effective and fair trial.
At this juncture, Bangladesh can validly claim that the extradition request meets the conditions stipulated in the 2013 Bangladesh-India Extradition Treaty and does not fall under grounds for rejection. However, the success of the deal depends on whether India accepts Bangladesh’s interpretation of the treaty. Historically, any attempts to extradite high-ranking political figures from allied nations have often produced more heat than light. The Hasina extradition attempt cannot be viewed in isolation, especially considering that she is widely recognised as one of India’s closest allies in South Asia. This complicates the matter further, given the political dynamics at play.
One of the key drawbacks of the 2013 Extradition Treaty is the absence of a compulsory dispute resolution mechanism. Bangladesh must, therefore, pursue the matter through diplomatic channels. While the Indian government has not made any official comments, some political commentators have raised concerns about the political nature of the crime, the fairness of trials and the potential use of the death penalty. In that context, the government should address these issues robustly alongside its diplomatic efforts.
It is often criticised that the call for the trial of Hasina is political in nature. In fact, political crimes are exempted from the purview of the 2013 Extradition Treaty. While the publicly available information about Bangladesh’s note verbale does not mention the forum of the trial, it can be inferred that it involved, as indicated by the ICT-BD chief prosecutor, the trials of international crimes. There is a global consensus that political crimes do not cover international crimes, and this does not attract the definition of political crimes provided in the 2013 Extradition Treaty.
The decision to hold trials for international crimes is viewed by some as politically motivated, though such trials themselves are not inherently political. The allegations of international crimes and human rights violations committed under Hasina’s regime are widely accepted. This view is supported by the OHCHR Preliminary Analysis on Bangladesh (August 16, 2024) and is likely to be reinforced by its upcoming final report. Additionally, the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances’ recent findings further substantiate these allegations. Thus, dismissing these accusations as political crimes would be equivalent to an indirect denial of those horrendous crimes inflicted on Bangladeshis during the last 15 years, including the July massacre.
There are some concerns regarding the ICT-BD’s adherence to fair trial standards. The ICT-BD has attracted widespread criticisms, mostly on its fair trial standards and the use of the death penalty, during its functioning in the Awami League era. The current interim government, aware of these criticisms, has amended the ICT-BD Act to replace its Nuremberg-era provisions with Rome Statute-era provisions. These amendments address rules of evidence, the rights of the defence and the rights of victims.
It is interesting to note that when Bangladesh moved to prosecute ICT-BD convicts despite the above-mentioned criticisms, India continued to strengthen its relations with the Awami League government. This pattern persisted even after the Awami League’s controversial re-election in a largely voteless 2014 general election.
In the current context, it is expected that the government should take adequate steps to ensure the proper implementation of these provisions, which appear to offer greater protections to both the accused and victims than the general criminal justice system of Bangladesh. The successful implementation of the provisions of the amended ICT-BD, alongside addressing other alleged irregularities in Bangladesh’s justice system, will provide a strong counter-justification for India’s hesitance to extradite Hasina.
Furthermore, there remain persistent concerns over the death penalty in the ICT-BD Act. In many extradition cases, the death penalty has been successfully cited as a bar to extradition, largely based on the principle of non-refoulement. Nevertheless, since both Bangladesh and India retain the death penalty, it is difficult to see why India would raise objections to its application in this case. While abolitionists often argue against the death penalty in transitional justice contexts, Bangladesh is not legally obligated to adopt this stance. On a related note, the issue of death penalty abolition may resurface, and it would be prudent for the current government to reconsider this matter.
On the other hand, it is equally implausible to imagine India amending its penal provisions to extradite an accused of terrorism from other death penalty-retaining states, including Bangladesh. This logic should also apply to cases involving serious international crimes supported by credible evidence in the present case.
Pending the anticipated delay by the Indian government, Bangladesh may simultaneously explore alternative forums for Hasina’s trials to facilitate an extradition agreement with India. This approach is supported by several precedents. For instance, former Liberian president Charles Taylor was prosecuted by the Special Tribunal for Sierra Leone in The Hague, Netherlands, rather than in Freetown, to ensure transparency and fair trial standards. Similarly, the deposed Chadian dictator Hissène Habré was tried by the African Extraordinary Chamber, a tribunal established jointly by the African Union and Senegal on the same grounds.
If India continues to delay the extradition deal, Bangladesh could propose an alternative judicial arrangement, potentially in collaboration with the UN or SAARC. International practice demonstrates that holding trials in multiple forums is feasible. In this case, the majority of the accused could be tried at the ICT-BD, while Sheikh Hasina would be tried at a specialised tribunal. In such a scenario, Bangladesh should prioritise the realisation of justice, rather than the forum in which it is pursued.
As events unfold, Bangladesh must remain open to further negotiations with India. Bangladesh should consider offering ‘diplomatic assurances’ to India, including guarantees to ensure Hasina’s fair trial rights and adherence to relevant human rights standards, with provisions for monitoring by India. This approach may become increasingly crucial in the days to come.
The Hasina extradition request serves as a critical test of India’s commitment to mending its recently strained bilateral relationship with Bangladesh, following the toppling of the Hasina government on August 5. In this context, India should approach the issue in good faith, interpreting the 2013 Extradition Treaty legally rather than politically. It remains to be seen whether the extradition request will lead to another irresolvable dispute between Bangladesh and India or whether it will signify a new phase of cooperation in their bilateral relations.
Quazi Omar Foysal is an international law expert, currently serving as a lecturer at American International University-Bangladesh and practising as an advocate at the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
by Quazi Omar Foysal 27 December, 2024, 00:00
New Age/Mehedi Haque
THE Bangladesh government lodging a formal request to extradite its former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, through a diplomatic note verbale dated December 23, 2024, is a welcome step towards addressing the allegations of human rights violations and international crimes during the fifteen-year-long tenure of the previous government. The extradition request is based on the 2013 Bangladesh-India Extradition Treaty (amended in 2016). This treaty was concluded during Hasina’s regime and binds both states under international law. As of now, India’s response to the note verbale has been limited to an acknowledgement of receipt. Bangladesh has subsequently revealed that it will remind India of the request but has not specified a timeline.
This decision by the government marks a clear departure from its earlier stance. On October 30, 2024, it had stated that it would request Sheikh Hasina’s extradition from India only after a successful trial outcome. This author has previously argued (New Age, November 9, 2024) that such an approach could potentially undermine the prospect of the extradition process itself. However, as the chief prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal-Bangladesh, ICT-BD, has rightly pointed out, the successful extradition of Hasina could pave the way for a more effective and fair trial.
At this juncture, Bangladesh can validly claim that the extradition request meets the conditions stipulated in the 2013 Bangladesh-India Extradition Treaty and does not fall under grounds for rejection. However, the success of the deal depends on whether India accepts Bangladesh’s interpretation of the treaty. Historically, any attempts to extradite high-ranking political figures from allied nations have often produced more heat than light. The Hasina extradition attempt cannot be viewed in isolation, especially considering that she is widely recognised as one of India’s closest allies in South Asia. This complicates the matter further, given the political dynamics at play.
One of the key drawbacks of the 2013 Extradition Treaty is the absence of a compulsory dispute resolution mechanism. Bangladesh must, therefore, pursue the matter through diplomatic channels. While the Indian government has not made any official comments, some political commentators have raised concerns about the political nature of the crime, the fairness of trials and the potential use of the death penalty. In that context, the government should address these issues robustly alongside its diplomatic efforts.
It is often criticised that the call for the trial of Hasina is political in nature. In fact, political crimes are exempted from the purview of the 2013 Extradition Treaty. While the publicly available information about Bangladesh’s note verbale does not mention the forum of the trial, it can be inferred that it involved, as indicated by the ICT-BD chief prosecutor, the trials of international crimes. There is a global consensus that political crimes do not cover international crimes, and this does not attract the definition of political crimes provided in the 2013 Extradition Treaty.
The decision to hold trials for international crimes is viewed by some as politically motivated, though such trials themselves are not inherently political. The allegations of international crimes and human rights violations committed under Hasina’s regime are widely accepted. This view is supported by the OHCHR Preliminary Analysis on Bangladesh (August 16, 2024) and is likely to be reinforced by its upcoming final report. Additionally, the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances’ recent findings further substantiate these allegations. Thus, dismissing these accusations as political crimes would be equivalent to an indirect denial of those horrendous crimes inflicted on Bangladeshis during the last 15 years, including the July massacre.
There are some concerns regarding the ICT-BD’s adherence to fair trial standards. The ICT-BD has attracted widespread criticisms, mostly on its fair trial standards and the use of the death penalty, during its functioning in the Awami League era. The current interim government, aware of these criticisms, has amended the ICT-BD Act to replace its Nuremberg-era provisions with Rome Statute-era provisions. These amendments address rules of evidence, the rights of the defence and the rights of victims.
It is interesting to note that when Bangladesh moved to prosecute ICT-BD convicts despite the above-mentioned criticisms, India continued to strengthen its relations with the Awami League government. This pattern persisted even after the Awami League’s controversial re-election in a largely voteless 2014 general election.
In the current context, it is expected that the government should take adequate steps to ensure the proper implementation of these provisions, which appear to offer greater protections to both the accused and victims than the general criminal justice system of Bangladesh. The successful implementation of the provisions of the amended ICT-BD, alongside addressing other alleged irregularities in Bangladesh’s justice system, will provide a strong counter-justification for India’s hesitance to extradite Hasina.
Furthermore, there remain persistent concerns over the death penalty in the ICT-BD Act. In many extradition cases, the death penalty has been successfully cited as a bar to extradition, largely based on the principle of non-refoulement. Nevertheless, since both Bangladesh and India retain the death penalty, it is difficult to see why India would raise objections to its application in this case. While abolitionists often argue against the death penalty in transitional justice contexts, Bangladesh is not legally obligated to adopt this stance. On a related note, the issue of death penalty abolition may resurface, and it would be prudent for the current government to reconsider this matter.
On the other hand, it is equally implausible to imagine India amending its penal provisions to extradite an accused of terrorism from other death penalty-retaining states, including Bangladesh. This logic should also apply to cases involving serious international crimes supported by credible evidence in the present case.
Pending the anticipated delay by the Indian government, Bangladesh may simultaneously explore alternative forums for Hasina’s trials to facilitate an extradition agreement with India. This approach is supported by several precedents. For instance, former Liberian president Charles Taylor was prosecuted by the Special Tribunal for Sierra Leone in The Hague, Netherlands, rather than in Freetown, to ensure transparency and fair trial standards. Similarly, the deposed Chadian dictator Hissène Habré was tried by the African Extraordinary Chamber, a tribunal established jointly by the African Union and Senegal on the same grounds.
If India continues to delay the extradition deal, Bangladesh could propose an alternative judicial arrangement, potentially in collaboration with the UN or SAARC. International practice demonstrates that holding trials in multiple forums is feasible. In this case, the majority of the accused could be tried at the ICT-BD, while Sheikh Hasina would be tried at a specialised tribunal. In such a scenario, Bangladesh should prioritise the realisation of justice, rather than the forum in which it is pursued.
As events unfold, Bangladesh must remain open to further negotiations with India. Bangladesh should consider offering ‘diplomatic assurances’ to India, including guarantees to ensure Hasina’s fair trial rights and adherence to relevant human rights standards, with provisions for monitoring by India. This approach may become increasingly crucial in the days to come.
The Hasina extradition request serves as a critical test of India’s commitment to mending its recently strained bilateral relationship with Bangladesh, following the toppling of the Hasina government on August 5. In this context, India should approach the issue in good faith, interpreting the 2013 Extradition Treaty legally rather than politically. It remains to be seen whether the extradition request will lead to another irresolvable dispute between Bangladesh and India or whether it will signify a new phase of cooperation in their bilateral relations.
Quazi Omar Foysal is an international law expert, currently serving as a lecturer at American International University-Bangladesh and practising as an advocate at the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #93
India unlikely to respond to call on Hasina extradition: Hindustan Times
The report noted that key procedural requirements have not been fulfilled by Dhaka to advance such a request.
India unlikely to respond to call on Hasina extradition: Hindustan Times
File photo
India is unlikely to act on Bangladesh's request to extradite former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the Hindustan Times reported today, citing sources familiar with the situation. The report noted that key procedural requirements have not been fulfilled by Dhaka to advance such a request.
The extradition plea was submitted as a note verbale—an informal diplomatic communication—by the Bangladesh High Commission in New Delhi to India's Ministry of External Affairs on December 23. This development occurred against the backdrop of heightened tensions in bilateral relations following the establishment of Bangladesh's interim government under Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus.
A note verbale, considered one of the most basic forms of diplomatic communication, is generally not used for sensitive matters like extradition requests, Hindustan Times reported, quoting sources on condition of anonymity.
Hasina, 77, has been residing in India since leaving Bangladesh amidst nationwide protests led by student groups. She fled Dhaka on August 5. Yunus and other interim government leaders have referred to her presence in India and her statements while in exile as contributing to tensions in India-Bangladesh relations.
Some observers in New Delhi view the extradition request as largely symbolic—a measure by Bangladesh's interim government to address domestic political pressures, particularly from student groups pushing for Hasina's return, the Hindustan Times reported, citing sources.
"Extradition is not some simple process and both parties making and receiving such a request have certain obligations. The person who is the subject of an extradition request also has options. Those options are yet to be exercised," the Hindustan Times quoted one source as saying.
The person sought for extradition retains the right to challenge the request in court, a step that has not yet been pursued.
Moreover, the India-Bangladesh extradition treaty of 2013 includes clauses under which an extradition request can be denied. Article 6, or the "Political Offence Exception" allows refusal if the offense is deemed political in nature, the newspaper stated.
Article 8, which outlines additional grounds for rejecting extradition, specifies that an individual cannot be extradited if the accusation lacks good faith or fails to serve the interests of justice, the report added.
The Hindustan Times also noted that during Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's visit to Dhaka last month, discussions focused on charting a constructive path forward in bilateral relations.
An official statement released after Misri's day-long visit on December 9 emphasised India's "willingness to build a positive and constructive relationship" with Bangladesh, built on mutual trust and respect for each other's concerns.
While reiterating India's support for a democratic, stable, and inclusive Bangladesh, Misri stressed that bilateral cooperation in areas like connectivity, trade, and energy is "geared towards the benefit of the people of Bangladesh".
Although India has ongoing concerns about the treatment of Hindus and other minorities in Bangladesh, there are indications that Dhaka's leadership may be adopting a more conciliatory stance towards New Delhi, reports Hindustan Times.
The Hindustan Times also observed that neither Hasina's presence in India nor Bangladesh's extradition request was mentioned in a detailed interview with Bangladesh Army Chief Gen Waker-Uz-Zaman published by Prothom Alo on Wednesday.
Zaman acknowledged Bangladesh's dependence on India as an "important neighbour" and will not do anything that goes against New Delhi's strategic interests. India has an interest in Bangladesh's stability and the two sides share a give-and-take relationship that "must be based on fairness", said The Hindustan Times.
Bangladesh's Foreign Affairs Adviser Touhid Hossain also highlighted the importance of balancing the extradition request with other pressing issues on Wednesday.
The reciprocal release of each country's fishermen on January 5 is seen as a step towards improving India-Bangladesh relations, the report concluded.
File photo
India is unlikely to act on Bangladesh's request to extradite former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the Hindustan Times reported today, citing sources familiar with the situation. The report noted that key procedural requirements have not been fulfilled by Dhaka to advance such a request.
The extradition plea was submitted as a note verbale—an informal diplomatic communication—by the Bangladesh High Commission in New Delhi to India's Ministry of External Affairs on December 23. This development occurred against the backdrop of heightened tensions in bilateral relations following the establishment of Bangladesh's interim government under Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus.
A note verbale, considered one of the most basic forms of diplomatic communication, is generally not used for sensitive matters like extradition requests, Hindustan Times reported, quoting sources on condition of anonymity.
Hasina, 77, has been residing in India since leaving Bangladesh amidst nationwide protests led by student groups. She fled Dhaka on August 5. Yunus and other interim government leaders have referred to her presence in India and her statements while in exile as contributing to tensions in India-Bangladesh relations.
Some observers in New Delhi view the extradition request as largely symbolic—a measure by Bangladesh's interim government to address domestic political pressures, particularly from student groups pushing for Hasina's return, the Hindustan Times reported, citing sources.
"Extradition is not some simple process and both parties making and receiving such a request have certain obligations. The person who is the subject of an extradition request also has options. Those options are yet to be exercised," the Hindustan Times quoted one source as saying.
The person sought for extradition retains the right to challenge the request in court, a step that has not yet been pursued.
Moreover, the India-Bangladesh extradition treaty of 2013 includes clauses under which an extradition request can be denied. Article 6, or the "Political Offence Exception" allows refusal if the offense is deemed political in nature, the newspaper stated.
Article 8, which outlines additional grounds for rejecting extradition, specifies that an individual cannot be extradited if the accusation lacks good faith or fails to serve the interests of justice, the report added.
The Hindustan Times also noted that during Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's visit to Dhaka last month, discussions focused on charting a constructive path forward in bilateral relations.
An official statement released after Misri's day-long visit on December 9 emphasised India's "willingness to build a positive and constructive relationship" with Bangladesh, built on mutual trust and respect for each other's concerns.
While reiterating India's support for a democratic, stable, and inclusive Bangladesh, Misri stressed that bilateral cooperation in areas like connectivity, trade, and energy is "geared towards the benefit of the people of Bangladesh".
Although India has ongoing concerns about the treatment of Hindus and other minorities in Bangladesh, there are indications that Dhaka's leadership may be adopting a more conciliatory stance towards New Delhi, reports Hindustan Times.
The Hindustan Times also observed that neither Hasina's presence in India nor Bangladesh's extradition request was mentioned in a detailed interview with Bangladesh Army Chief Gen Waker-Uz-Zaman published by Prothom Alo on Wednesday.
Zaman acknowledged Bangladesh's dependence on India as an "important neighbour" and will not do anything that goes against New Delhi's strategic interests. India has an interest in Bangladesh's stability and the two sides share a give-and-take relationship that "must be based on fairness", said The Hindustan Times.
Bangladesh's Foreign Affairs Adviser Touhid Hossain also highlighted the importance of balancing the extradition request with other pressing issues on Wednesday.
The reciprocal release of each country's fishermen on January 5 is seen as a step towards improving India-Bangladesh relations, the report concluded.
Hasina should be granted Indian citizenship.
It would be ridiculously easy to do.
The fact that neither India nor Hasina are opting for that option should tell the chaddi warriors something.
The fact that neither India nor Hasina are opting for that option should tell the chaddi warriors something.
- Jan 24, 2024
- 2,151
- 1,067
- Copy to clipboard
- Moderator
- #96
You will no doubt read about it in the US, when we do it, little runt.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #98
We can offer Bangladeshi citizenship to ex ULFA leader Paresh Barua.
www.thedailystar.net
‘What can we do?’
Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain yesterday said he has come to know about the reported visa extension of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who is staying in India since her ouster on August 5 last year, through media.
‘What can we do?’
Says Touhid on ‘Hasina’s visa extension by India’
Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain yesterday said he has come to know about the reported visa extension of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who is staying in India since her ouster on August 5 last year, through media.
"Like you, I also got to know it from newspapers. What can we do?" he said when journalists asked him about the reported visa extension of Hasina at the foreign ministry.
Quoting sources in New Delhi, the Hindustan Times yesterday reported that New Delhi extended Sheikh Hasina's visa.
According to the report, the Union home ministry was required to sign off on the visa extension through the local Foreigners Regional Registration Office. Authorities, however, dismissed claims that the former leader had been granted 'asylum' in the country.
Bangladesh sought Hasina's extradition through a note verbal sent to the Indian Ministry of External Affairs on December 23.
Asked about New Delhi's response to the communication, Touhid Hossain told reporters: "We have not yet received any response to our letter."
On Monday, the Department of Immigration and Passports cancelled the passports of 97 people, including Hasina, for their alleged involvement in enforced disappearances and killings during protests in July.
Says Touhid on ‘Hasina’s visa extension by India’
Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain yesterday said he has come to know about the reported visa extension of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, who is staying in India since her ouster on August 5 last year, through media.
"Like you, I also got to know it from newspapers. What can we do?" he said when journalists asked him about the reported visa extension of Hasina at the foreign ministry.
Quoting sources in New Delhi, the Hindustan Times yesterday reported that New Delhi extended Sheikh Hasina's visa.
According to the report, the Union home ministry was required to sign off on the visa extension through the local Foreigners Regional Registration Office. Authorities, however, dismissed claims that the former leader had been granted 'asylum' in the country.
Bangladesh sought Hasina's extradition through a note verbal sent to the Indian Ministry of External Affairs on December 23.
Asked about New Delhi's response to the communication, Touhid Hossain told reporters: "We have not yet received any response to our letter."
On Monday, the Department of Immigration and Passports cancelled the passports of 97 people, including Hasina, for their alleged involvement in enforced disappearances and killings during protests in July.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #99
No response yet from India over Hasina's extradition: Touhid Hossain
Foreign adviser Md Touhid Hossain has said they have not received any response from India on extraditing Sheikh Hasina. The foreign adviser made this remark while answering queries from newsmen at the foreign ministry on Wednesday.
en.prothomalo.com
No response yet from India over Hasina's extradition: Touhid Hossain
Diplomatic Correspondent
Dhaka
Updated: 08 Jan 2025, 22: 17
Foreign adviser Md. Touhid Hossain at a media briefing at the foreign ministry on 1 October 2024File photo
Foreign adviser Md Touhid Hossain has said they have not received any response from India on extradition of Sheikh Hasina.
The foreign adviser made this remark while answering queries from newsmen at the foreign ministry on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, New Delhi has extended the tenure of visa of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina.
When asked about the development, Touhid Hossain said, "Like you, I have also learnt from the newspaper. What can we do."
When asked whether you received any response to the letter seeking repatriation of Sheikh Hasina, the adviser said, "We have not received any response to the letter sent to India for the repatriation of Sheikh Hasina."
On 23 December, Bangladesh sent a letter to India for extraditing former prime minister Sheikh Hasina on charges of crimes against humanity.
Sheikh Hasina has been staying in India since she fled to India on 5 August. Since then Bangladesh is making calls to bring her home back.
According to a report of The Hindustan Times, India has extended the tenure of visa for Sheikh Hasina.
The report also read that Hasina, 77, fled to India after stepping down amid nationwide protests. She has not been allowed to communicate with other people since she arrived at Hindon airbase on 5 August. She, however, has been moved to a safehouse in Delhi.
The former prime minister's visa was recently extended to facilitate her stay in the country, the people said on condition of anonymity. They dismissed speculation about Hasina being granted asylum in the country by pointing out that India doesn’t have a specific law for dealing with refugees and matters such as asylum.
Diplomatic Correspondent
Dhaka
Updated: 08 Jan 2025, 22: 17
Foreign adviser Md. Touhid Hossain at a media briefing at the foreign ministry on 1 October 2024File photo
Foreign adviser Md Touhid Hossain has said they have not received any response from India on extradition of Sheikh Hasina.
The foreign adviser made this remark while answering queries from newsmen at the foreign ministry on Wednesday.
Meanwhile, New Delhi has extended the tenure of visa of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina.
When asked about the development, Touhid Hossain said, "Like you, I have also learnt from the newspaper. What can we do."
When asked whether you received any response to the letter seeking repatriation of Sheikh Hasina, the adviser said, "We have not received any response to the letter sent to India for the repatriation of Sheikh Hasina."
On 23 December, Bangladesh sent a letter to India for extraditing former prime minister Sheikh Hasina on charges of crimes against humanity.
Sheikh Hasina has been staying in India since she fled to India on 5 August. Since then Bangladesh is making calls to bring her home back.
According to a report of The Hindustan Times, India has extended the tenure of visa for Sheikh Hasina.
The report also read that Hasina, 77, fled to India after stepping down amid nationwide protests. She has not been allowed to communicate with other people since she arrived at Hindon airbase on 5 August. She, however, has been moved to a safehouse in Delhi.
The former prime minister's visa was recently extended to facilitate her stay in the country, the people said on condition of anonymity. They dismissed speculation about Hasina being granted asylum in the country by pointing out that India doesn’t have a specific law for dealing with refugees and matters such as asylum.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #100
Visa issue doesn’t exist once passport is revoked: Govt
Referring to deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s reported visa extension, the interim government on Thursday said the visa issue does not exist once a passport is cancelled. “I would give you a general answer – if a passport is cancelled, no visa issue remains,” Spokespe
Visa issue doesn’t exist once passport is revoked: Govt
Published :
Jan 09, 2025 21:10
Updated :
Jan 09, 2025 21:10
Referring to deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s reported visa extension, the interim government on Thursday said the visa issue does not exist once a passport is cancelled.
“I would give you a general answer – if a passport is cancelled, no visa issue remains,” Spokesperson at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mohammad Rafiqul Alam told reporters while responding to a question at a weekly briefing at the ministry.
He also said that passport cancellation issues are notified through Bangladesh Missions abroad so that countries with diplomatic relations with Bangladesh are informed about the cancellation, UNB reports.
“As we don’t have additional information, we would not speculate,” Alam added.
Earlier, the Department of Immigration and Passports revoked the passports of 97 people, including Hasina, due to their alleged involvement in the July killings and alleged involvement in enforced disappearances.
However, the Hindustan Times, a major national daily of India, reported that Sheikh Hasina’s visa extension was recently approved, and facilitated by India’s Union Home Ministry through the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO).
Hasina, 77, has been residing in India since fleeing her country in August last year, following widespread protests that culminated in her resignation.
"Like you, I too came to know about this (extension of Sheikh Hasina's visa) through the newspaper. What can we do?" Foreign Adviser Md. Touhid Hossain posed a counter question when journalists approached him at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday.
He also said they have not yet received a response to the letter (note verbale) sent to India requesting Sheikh Hasina's extradition.
“At this moment, we are waiting for India’s reply,” Spokesperson Alam said on Thursday, adding that there is no relation between the former prime minister’s status in India and Dhaka’s request for her extradition.
The spokesperson said everyone knows that she is in India and Bangladesh requested her extradition as a citizen of Bangladesh.
The interim government in Bangladesh, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, formally requested Hasina’s extradition through a note verbale sent to India’s Ministry of External Affairs on December 23.
Published :
Jan 09, 2025 21:10
Updated :
Jan 09, 2025 21:10
Referring to deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s reported visa extension, the interim government on Thursday said the visa issue does not exist once a passport is cancelled.
“I would give you a general answer – if a passport is cancelled, no visa issue remains,” Spokesperson at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mohammad Rafiqul Alam told reporters while responding to a question at a weekly briefing at the ministry.
He also said that passport cancellation issues are notified through Bangladesh Missions abroad so that countries with diplomatic relations with Bangladesh are informed about the cancellation, UNB reports.
“As we don’t have additional information, we would not speculate,” Alam added.
Earlier, the Department of Immigration and Passports revoked the passports of 97 people, including Hasina, due to their alleged involvement in the July killings and alleged involvement in enforced disappearances.
However, the Hindustan Times, a major national daily of India, reported that Sheikh Hasina’s visa extension was recently approved, and facilitated by India’s Union Home Ministry through the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO).
Hasina, 77, has been residing in India since fleeing her country in August last year, following widespread protests that culminated in her resignation.
"Like you, I too came to know about this (extension of Sheikh Hasina's visa) through the newspaper. What can we do?" Foreign Adviser Md. Touhid Hossain posed a counter question when journalists approached him at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday.
He also said they have not yet received a response to the letter (note verbale) sent to India requesting Sheikh Hasina's extradition.
“At this moment, we are waiting for India’s reply,” Spokesperson Alam said on Thursday, adding that there is no relation between the former prime minister’s status in India and Dhaka’s request for her extradition.
The spokesperson said everyone knows that she is in India and Bangladesh requested her extradition as a citizen of Bangladesh.
The interim government in Bangladesh, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, formally requested Hasina’s extradition through a note verbale sent to India’s Ministry of External Affairs on December 23.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #101
Bangladesh has no info on whether Hasina given Indian citizenship: MoFA
The Bangladesh foreign ministry has no information regarding whether ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has obtained Indian citizenship
en.prothomalo.com
Bangladesh has no info on whether Hasina given Indian citizenship: MoFA
BSS
Published: 16 Jan 2025, 22: 49
Foreign ministry’s spokesperson Mohammad Rafiqul Alam BSS
The Bangladesh foreign ministry has no information regarding whether ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has obtained Indian citizenship.
“We do not have any information on whether former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has taken Indian citizenship,” ministry’s spokesperson Mohammad Rafiqul Alam made the remark while responding to a question at the ministry’s weekly briefing.
He added that Hasina’s current status is a matter under the jurisdiction of the Indian government.
Hasina has been residing in India since fleeing the country in August last year, following widespread protests that culminated in her resignation.
Regarding demands to review all agreements with India, Rafiqul Alam clarified, “Bilateral agreements with India have been made by various ministries and agencies.
If any ministry or agency feels the need for a review, they may proceed accordingly.”
When asked if all agreements with India will be made public, the spokesperson explained, “All agreements with India are already public.
You can view them on the Indian Ministry of External Affairs’ website.”
In response to another query, he stated, “I am not aware of any secret agreements with India.”
Answering another query, Alam said Dhaka is waiting for India’s reply regarding Bangladesh’s new High Commissioner to India as Bangladesh sought agrimo (recognition).
“We are waiting for India’s reply. I don’t think it is taking more time than usual.
There is no specific timeframe but usually it is by 3 to 4 months,” said the spokesperson.
BSS
Published: 16 Jan 2025, 22: 49
Foreign ministry’s spokesperson Mohammad Rafiqul Alam BSS
The Bangladesh foreign ministry has no information regarding whether ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has obtained Indian citizenship.
“We do not have any information on whether former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has taken Indian citizenship,” ministry’s spokesperson Mohammad Rafiqul Alam made the remark while responding to a question at the ministry’s weekly briefing.
He added that Hasina’s current status is a matter under the jurisdiction of the Indian government.
Hasina has been residing in India since fleeing the country in August last year, following widespread protests that culminated in her resignation.
Regarding demands to review all agreements with India, Rafiqul Alam clarified, “Bilateral agreements with India have been made by various ministries and agencies.
If any ministry or agency feels the need for a review, they may proceed accordingly.”
When asked if all agreements with India will be made public, the spokesperson explained, “All agreements with India are already public.
You can view them on the Indian Ministry of External Affairs’ website.”
In response to another query, he stated, “I am not aware of any secret agreements with India.”
Answering another query, Alam said Dhaka is waiting for India’s reply regarding Bangladesh’s new High Commissioner to India as Bangladesh sought agrimo (recognition).
“We are waiting for India’s reply. I don’t think it is taking more time than usual.
There is no specific timeframe but usually it is by 3 to 4 months,” said the spokesperson.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #102
Hasina must be brought back thru legal process: Shafiqul
Shafiqul made the remarks while speaking as the main discussant at a seminar titled, "July Revolution Aspirations and the Media"
Hasina must be brought back thru legal process: Shafiqul
Photo: BSS
Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam today said ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina must be returned to the country through legal process and brought her to justice.
"The way Sheikh Hasina brought back her father's murderers, we will bring back the murderers of the movement and try them in court," he said.
Shafiqul made the remarks while speaking as the main discussant at a seminar titled, "July Revolution Aspirations and the Media".
The Islamic University (IU) authorities and the Islamic University Journalists Association (IUJA) jointly organised this seminar at Bir Shrestha Hamidur Rahman Auditorium on the campus in Khulna.
Alam said the interim government is working on state reforms to build Bangladesh as per the aspirations of the July revolution and implementing the aspirations of the people.
He also said half of the IU students are females, which is a very good image.
"I saw in the documentary that girls were leading the July movement. This university played an important role in the movement," the press secretary said.
Noting that this image should be conveyed to the world as the future of the students is related to the image, he said, "We have to work to preserve the history of the movement of this university."
He said the names of the halls that still remain in the name of the dictator need to be changed to the martyrs' names.
The press secretary said the aspirations of people are being fulfilled through reform commissions to build a new Bangladesh.
The reports of commissions are the outcomes of the July uprising, he said, urging all students to read these reports and join debate on those on the campus.
Photo: BSS
Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam today said ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina must be returned to the country through legal process and brought her to justice.
"The way Sheikh Hasina brought back her father's murderers, we will bring back the murderers of the movement and try them in court," he said.
Shafiqul made the remarks while speaking as the main discussant at a seminar titled, "July Revolution Aspirations and the Media".
The Islamic University (IU) authorities and the Islamic University Journalists Association (IUJA) jointly organised this seminar at Bir Shrestha Hamidur Rahman Auditorium on the campus in Khulna.
Alam said the interim government is working on state reforms to build Bangladesh as per the aspirations of the July revolution and implementing the aspirations of the people.
He also said half of the IU students are females, which is a very good image.
"I saw in the documentary that girls were leading the July movement. This university played an important role in the movement," the press secretary said.
Noting that this image should be conveyed to the world as the future of the students is related to the image, he said, "We have to work to preserve the history of the movement of this university."
He said the names of the halls that still remain in the name of the dictator need to be changed to the martyrs' names.
The press secretary said the aspirations of people are being fulfilled through reform commissions to build a new Bangladesh.
The reports of commissions are the outcomes of the July uprising, he said, urging all students to read these reports and join debate on those on the campus.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #103
Refusal to return Hasina violation of extradition treaty: Law adviser
Published :
Jan 21, 2025 17:38
Updated :
Jan 21, 2025 17:38
Law Adviser Dr Asif Nazrul has said that if India refuses to return Sheikh Hasina, it would constitute a violation of the extradition treaty between Bangladesh and India.
"We have written a letter for extradition. If India does not extradite Sheikh Hasina, it will be a clear violation of the extradition treaty between Bangladesh and India," he said at a views-exchange meeting with reporters at the Secretariat on Tuesday.
In that case, he said, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will take necessary steps to address the matter within the international community.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also making efforts and a red alert has already been issued, he added.
"We are doing everything we can. The government will continue all efforts to bring Sheikh Hasina back. If necessary, international support will be sought,” said the law adviser.
Referring to the trial of the July mass killings, the adviser said a second tribunal will be formed, if needed, to expedite the trial of those involved in the massacre, UNB reports.
“There is no conflict between the trial of the July mass killing criminals and the upcoming elections. The trial will proceed at its own pace. We will finish the trial work as quickly as possible. If necessary, international judges will be appointed,” he said.
Published :
Jan 21, 2025 17:38
Updated :
Jan 21, 2025 17:38
Law Adviser Dr Asif Nazrul has said that if India refuses to return Sheikh Hasina, it would constitute a violation of the extradition treaty between Bangladesh and India.
"We have written a letter for extradition. If India does not extradite Sheikh Hasina, it will be a clear violation of the extradition treaty between Bangladesh and India," he said at a views-exchange meeting with reporters at the Secretariat on Tuesday.
In that case, he said, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will take necessary steps to address the matter within the international community.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also making efforts and a red alert has already been issued, he added.
"We are doing everything we can. The government will continue all efforts to bring Sheikh Hasina back. If necessary, international support will be sought,” said the law adviser.
Referring to the trial of the July mass killings, the adviser said a second tribunal will be formed, if needed, to expedite the trial of those involved in the massacre, UNB reports.
“There is no conflict between the trial of the July mass killing criminals and the upcoming elections. The trial will proceed at its own pace. We will finish the trial work as quickly as possible. If necessary, international judges will be appointed,” he said.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #104
No update on red notice for Hasina, says foreign ministry
The foreign ministry has said there is no updated information regarding the issuance of a red notice by Interpol for the return of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina from India to face trial. During the ministry's weekly briefing on Monday, spokesperson Rafiqul Alam responded to media inquiries,
No update on red notice for Hasina, says foreign ministry
bdnews24.com
Published :
Jan 28, 2025 00:11
Updated :
Jan 28, 2025 00:11
The foreign ministry has said there is no updated information regarding the issuance of a red notice by Interpol for the return of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina from India to face trial.
During the ministry's weekly briefing on Monday, spokesperson Rafiqul Alam responded to media inquiries, saying: “I do not have updated information on the red notice matter.”
Hasina has been residing in India since fleeing there on Aug 5, following massive public protests.
While several senior leaders of her party, the Awami League, have been arrested, most remain in hiding.
In the wake of the student movement and subsequent crackdown, charges have been filed at the International Crimes Tribunal, or ICT, accusing Hasina and others of crimes against humanity, including “genocide”, in relation to the government’s actions during the protests.
The interim government has started the trial process for these charges.
Between Jul 5 and Aug 5, a number of allegations related to “genocide and crimes against humanity” were submitted to the tribunal’s investigation agency and prosecution office during the student-led mass movements across Bangladesh.
Among these, arrest warrants have been issued by the tribunal for Hasina, her family members, and senior Awami League leaders in two cases.
On Dec 23, Bangladesh sent a diplomatic note to the Indian government, requesting Hasina’s return for trial.
However, India has yet to provide an official response, with media reports indicating that her visa has been extended.
Before sending the diplomatic note, the government and the ICT prosecution department had been discussing the possibility of issuing Interpol's red notice to facilitate Hasina’s return.
On Nov 12, the tribunal’s Chief Prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam said steps would be taken to issue the red notice after corresponding with the Inspector General of Police Baharul Alam.
However, more than two and a half months later, no red notice has been listed on the International Criminal Police Organisation or Interpol’s website.
WHAT IS AN INTERPOL RED NOTICE?
According to Interpol, a red notice is a process through which law-enforcing agencies around the world are asked to locate and temporarily detain individuals who are the subject of extradition or surrender procedures.
It is not an international arrest warrant.
The Interpol site clarified that member countries follow their own domestic laws when executing arrests based on a red notice.
These notices are intended solely for use by law-enforcing agencies and are typically shared publicly at the request of member countries.
In response to further questions on the red notice for Hasina, Rafiqul said: “A country can request a red notice through Interpol by providing details about a suspected criminal, after which the relevant country can apply for the notice. The red notice is similar to an international arrest warrant.”
BENGALURU INCIDENT, BORDER KILLING INQUIRY
Rafiqul also provided updates regarding two other incidents involving Bangladeshi nationals in India.
He confirmed that the ministry had requested information regarding the death of a Bangladeshi woman, who was allegedly raped and murdered in Bengaluru.
A body of the 28-year-old Bangladeshi woman was discovered on the banks of a lake in the Ramamurthy area of the southern Indian state.
Initial reports from police indicated that she had been raped and murdered.
The identity of the woman has not been released by the Karnataka police, although they confirmed she worked as a domestic help in an apartment building in Bengaluru.
Her family lives in the same area, and her husband works as a sanitation worker for the Bengaluru Municipal Corporation.
In response to another query, the spokesperson said the ministry was also looking into the recent incident at the Kulaura border, where a Bangladeshi national was reportedly killed.
Rafiqul said, “We are investigating the matter. From what we have gathered, it appears to be more of a family dispute. Since this incident involved border crossing, the BGB [Border Guard Bangladesh] is in talks with the Border Security Force. We do not have all the details, but our relevant wing is looking into it.”
In a separate issue, Rafiqul commented on the participation of a high-level government delegation in India’s Republic Day celebrations, calling it a normal diplomatic occurrence.
He remarked: “We have always maintained that Bangladesh hopes for good relations with all countries. There is no special reason to view this differently. At such events, it is typical for a high-level representative to attend, including the guest of honour. This is a routine diplomatic practice.”
bdnews24.com
Published :
Jan 28, 2025 00:11
Updated :
Jan 28, 2025 00:11
The foreign ministry has said there is no updated information regarding the issuance of a red notice by Interpol for the return of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina from India to face trial.
During the ministry's weekly briefing on Monday, spokesperson Rafiqul Alam responded to media inquiries, saying: “I do not have updated information on the red notice matter.”
Hasina has been residing in India since fleeing there on Aug 5, following massive public protests.
While several senior leaders of her party, the Awami League, have been arrested, most remain in hiding.
In the wake of the student movement and subsequent crackdown, charges have been filed at the International Crimes Tribunal, or ICT, accusing Hasina and others of crimes against humanity, including “genocide”, in relation to the government’s actions during the protests.
The interim government has started the trial process for these charges.
Between Jul 5 and Aug 5, a number of allegations related to “genocide and crimes against humanity” were submitted to the tribunal’s investigation agency and prosecution office during the student-led mass movements across Bangladesh.
Among these, arrest warrants have been issued by the tribunal for Hasina, her family members, and senior Awami League leaders in two cases.
On Dec 23, Bangladesh sent a diplomatic note to the Indian government, requesting Hasina’s return for trial.
However, India has yet to provide an official response, with media reports indicating that her visa has been extended.
Before sending the diplomatic note, the government and the ICT prosecution department had been discussing the possibility of issuing Interpol's red notice to facilitate Hasina’s return.
On Nov 12, the tribunal’s Chief Prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam said steps would be taken to issue the red notice after corresponding with the Inspector General of Police Baharul Alam.
However, more than two and a half months later, no red notice has been listed on the International Criminal Police Organisation or Interpol’s website.
WHAT IS AN INTERPOL RED NOTICE?
According to Interpol, a red notice is a process through which law-enforcing agencies around the world are asked to locate and temporarily detain individuals who are the subject of extradition or surrender procedures.
It is not an international arrest warrant.
The Interpol site clarified that member countries follow their own domestic laws when executing arrests based on a red notice.
These notices are intended solely for use by law-enforcing agencies and are typically shared publicly at the request of member countries.
In response to further questions on the red notice for Hasina, Rafiqul said: “A country can request a red notice through Interpol by providing details about a suspected criminal, after which the relevant country can apply for the notice. The red notice is similar to an international arrest warrant.”
BENGALURU INCIDENT, BORDER KILLING INQUIRY
Rafiqul also provided updates regarding two other incidents involving Bangladeshi nationals in India.
He confirmed that the ministry had requested information regarding the death of a Bangladeshi woman, who was allegedly raped and murdered in Bengaluru.
A body of the 28-year-old Bangladeshi woman was discovered on the banks of a lake in the Ramamurthy area of the southern Indian state.
Initial reports from police indicated that she had been raped and murdered.
The identity of the woman has not been released by the Karnataka police, although they confirmed she worked as a domestic help in an apartment building in Bengaluru.
Her family lives in the same area, and her husband works as a sanitation worker for the Bengaluru Municipal Corporation.
In response to another query, the spokesperson said the ministry was also looking into the recent incident at the Kulaura border, where a Bangladeshi national was reportedly killed.
Rafiqul said, “We are investigating the matter. From what we have gathered, it appears to be more of a family dispute. Since this incident involved border crossing, the BGB [Border Guard Bangladesh] is in talks with the Border Security Force. We do not have all the details, but our relevant wing is looking into it.”
In a separate issue, Rafiqul commented on the participation of a high-level government delegation in India’s Republic Day celebrations, calling it a normal diplomatic occurrence.
He remarked: “We have always maintained that Bangladesh hopes for good relations with all countries. There is no special reason to view this differently. At such events, it is typical for a high-level representative to attend, including the guest of honour. This is a routine diplomatic practice.”
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #105
Interim govt requests Interpol to issue red notice on Sheikh Hasina
Bangladesh has requested the Interpol to issue a red notice on deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina who has been living in India since she was overthrown in the August uprising. Police chief Baharul Alam disclosed the information at a high-level meeting with security chiefs, presided over by inter
Interim govt requests Interpol to issue red notice on Sheikh Hasina
Published :
Feb 03, 2025 23:04
Updated :
Feb 03, 2025 23:04
Bangladesh has requested the Interpol to issue a red notice on deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina who has been living in India since she was overthrown in the August uprising.
Police chief Baharul Alam disclosed the information at a high-level meeting with security chiefs, presided over by interim government head Muhammad Yunus, at the State Guest House Jamuna on Monday, the Chief Adviser’s Office said in a statement.
"We've made a request. We hope we will get some response soon," he said.
Baharul said police have set up 10 teams to monitor the murder cases filed over the atrocities and killings by Hasina's security forces during July and August.
Yunus directed police to fast-track these cases and to make sure that no innocent people are harassed by these cases, the statement read.
He also asked police and the law-enforcing agencies to create a command centre to intensively monitor law and order situation in the country.
The assembly was also attended by Home Advisor Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, Special Assistant to Chief Adviser Khuda Baksh Chowdhury, Home Secretary Nasimul Gani, and chiefs of police, BGB, RAB, DMP, Coast Guard and Special Branch.
Yunus said the security agencies must make maximum use of the latest communication tools to make sure they can quickly intervene in a situation.
"We have to set up a command center or a command headquarters, which will coordinate among all the police and security agencies," he told senior security officials.
The chief adviser said the new command structure would "skillfully and intensively" communicate among all agencies, police stations across the country and all law-enforcing authorities.
He ordered the security chiefs to stay vigilant against any attempt to disrupt the law and order situation in Bangladesh.
"We have to be as alert as if we were in a war-like situation. This year is a very critical year for the country. We must not allow anyone to create chaos and anarchy," he said.
The adviser said the cronies of Hasina were spending a huge amount of money to attempt to foment anarchy and spread disinformation.
"We must stay vigilant. Everyone should fight against this disinformation menace," he said.
He ordered the security chiefs to protect the human rights of every citizen and take special measures to thwart any attacks on the religious or ethnic minorities.
"Our global image will be badly damaged if we can't protect our religious minorities. We will also have to be very transparent in this regard," he said.
The chief adviser also ordered police to launch a crackdown on extortionists in an effort to keep prices of food and essential commodities stable during Ramadan.
Published :
Feb 03, 2025 23:04
Updated :
Feb 03, 2025 23:04
Bangladesh has requested the Interpol to issue a red notice on deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina who has been living in India since she was overthrown in the August uprising.
Police chief Baharul Alam disclosed the information at a high-level meeting with security chiefs, presided over by interim government head Muhammad Yunus, at the State Guest House Jamuna on Monday, the Chief Adviser’s Office said in a statement.
"We've made a request. We hope we will get some response soon," he said.
Baharul said police have set up 10 teams to monitor the murder cases filed over the atrocities and killings by Hasina's security forces during July and August.
Yunus directed police to fast-track these cases and to make sure that no innocent people are harassed by these cases, the statement read.
He also asked police and the law-enforcing agencies to create a command centre to intensively monitor law and order situation in the country.
The assembly was also attended by Home Advisor Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, Special Assistant to Chief Adviser Khuda Baksh Chowdhury, Home Secretary Nasimul Gani, and chiefs of police, BGB, RAB, DMP, Coast Guard and Special Branch.
Yunus said the security agencies must make maximum use of the latest communication tools to make sure they can quickly intervene in a situation.
"We have to set up a command center or a command headquarters, which will coordinate among all the police and security agencies," he told senior security officials.
The chief adviser said the new command structure would "skillfully and intensively" communicate among all agencies, police stations across the country and all law-enforcing authorities.
He ordered the security chiefs to stay vigilant against any attempt to disrupt the law and order situation in Bangladesh.
"We have to be as alert as if we were in a war-like situation. This year is a very critical year for the country. We must not allow anyone to create chaos and anarchy," he said.
The adviser said the cronies of Hasina were spending a huge amount of money to attempt to foment anarchy and spread disinformation.
"We must stay vigilant. Everyone should fight against this disinformation menace," he said.
He ordered the security chiefs to protect the human rights of every citizen and take special measures to thwart any attacks on the religious or ethnic minorities.
"Our global image will be badly damaged if we can't protect our religious minorities. We will also have to be very transparent in this regard," he said.
The chief adviser also ordered police to launch a crackdown on extortionists in an effort to keep prices of food and essential commodities stable during Ramadan.
Similar threads
Latest Posts
-
-
-
-
[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[🇮🇳] How this Indian submarine base checkmates China
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
