โ˜• Support Us โ˜•
[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท] - Iran's Nuclear Program | Page 4 | PKDefense

[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท] Iran's Nuclear Program

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G   Iranian Defense
[๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท] Iran's Nuclear Program
139
4K
More threads by Saif

This is a new googly bro. Never saw it that way. What's the end game. Sorry to be borderline dismissive, but why Pakistan? You are really not that important in any key way globally.
Yeah but to us our country is important. We want change and chinas collusion with the US in maintaining that military junta regime in Pakistan is detrimental to all Pakistani citizens.

We want a Pakistani gubment that represents our interests and not US or Chinese interests.

China is a US toady.
 
Yeah but to us our country is important. We want change and chinas collusion with the US in maintaining that military junta regime in Pakistan is detrimental to all Pakistani citizens.

We want a Pakistani gubment that represents our interests and not US or Chinese interests.

China is a US toady.

Of course I understand what Pakistanis want.

But why would China collude with the US to prop up your military political charade.

What is THEIR endgame.
 
Of course I understand what Pakistanis want.

But why would China collude with the US to prop up your military political charade.

What is THEIR endgame.
I donโ€™t know. Itโ€™s a great question no?

However actions speak louder than words. All inferior military equipment is supplied to regimes by China only if they are friendly to the US.

Recently the Chinese have transferred an entire ballistic missile program including a whole factory to the Sawdiโ€™s.

All the junk weapons we operate are provided by China too. We know theyโ€™re junk, the US knows theyโ€™re junk, they wonโ€™t make any difference nor will they ever be used in anger.

China is a known US toady. Works with the US hand in hand.

Just look at sino/ US trade volume bhai.
 
I donโ€™t know. Itโ€™s a great question no?

However actions speak louder than words. All inferior military equipment is supplied to regimes by China only if they are friendly to the US.

Recently the Chinese have transferred an entire ballistic missile program including a whole factory to the Sawdiโ€™s.

All the junk weapons we operate are provided by China too. We know theyโ€™re junk, the US knows theyโ€™re junk, they wonโ€™t make any difference nor will they ever be used in anger.

China is a known US toady. Works with the US hand in hand.

Just look at sino/ US trade volume bhai.

US and China double-teaming on India. BKL.
 
US and China double-teaming on India. BKL.
You know it Docโ€ฆโ€ฆ.US uses China as a check on India, to fly straight like a pigโ€ฆโ€ฆ.

Likewise whatever the US wants geopolitically bhai, there is China to help out no?

This is why Iran has moved away from China and is now getting closer toward Imam Putin.

I donโ€™t believe anyone trusts China.
 
I donโ€™t think Iran should be talking to this elond musk no? Iss say baat kar k kya milay ga Iran ko? Heโ€™s fukking useless no?

Iran should keep up the pressure and make sure the US loses in both the ME and Ukraine no?

Iโ€™d be so disappointed if Iran talks to this doofus elond:

 

Iran to launch โ€˜advanced centrifugesโ€™ in response to IAEA censure
Agence France-Presse . Tehran 22 November, 2024, 21:38

1732325729144.png

Participants look at Iranian Almas missiles, 1st, 2nd and 3rd left, displayed at Iranโ€™s defence industry achievements exhibition, on August 23, 2023 in Tehran. | AFP photo

Iran said on Friday it would launch a series of โ€˜new and advancedโ€™ centrifuges in response to a resolution adopted by the UN nuclear watchdog that censures Tehran for what the agency called lack of cooperation.

The censure motion brought by Britain, France, Germany, and the United States at the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency follows a similar one in June.

It came as tensions run high over Iranโ€™s atomic programme, with critics fearing that Tehran is attempting to develop a nuclear weapon โ€” a claim the Islamic Republic has repeatedly denied.

The resolution โ€” which China, Russia and Burkina Faso voted against โ€” carried with 19 votes in favour, 12 abstentions and Venezuela not participating, two diplomats said.

โ€˜The head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran issued an order to take effective measures, including launching a significant series of new and advanced centrifuges of various types,โ€™ a joint statement by the organisation and Iranโ€™s foreign ministry said.

Centrifuges are the machines that enrich uranium transformed into gas by rotating it at very high speed, increasing the proportion of fissile isotope material (U-235).

โ€˜At the same time, technical and safeguards cooperation with the IAEA will continue, as in the pastโ€™ and within the framework of agreements made by Iran, the joint Iranian statement added.

Behrouz Kamalvandi, Iranโ€™s atomic energy organisation spokesman, on Friday said the new measures are mostly related to uranium enrichment.

โ€˜We will substantially increase the enrichment capacity with the utilisation of different types of advanced machines,โ€™ he told state TV.

Iranโ€™s retaliatory measures โ€˜are reversible if this (Western) hostile action is withdrawn or negotiations are opened,โ€™ Tehran-based political analyst Hadi Mohammadi said.

The confidential resolution seen by AFP says it is โ€˜essential and urgentโ€™ for Iran to โ€˜act to fulfil its legal obligationsโ€™ under the Non-Proliferation Treaty ratified in 1970.

The text also calls on Tehran to provide โ€˜technically credible explanationsโ€™ for the presence of uranium particles found at two undeclared locations in Iran.

In addition, Western powers are asking for a โ€˜comprehensive reportโ€™ to be issued by the IAEA on Iranโ€™s nuclear efforts โ€˜at the latestโ€™ by spring 2025.

The resolution comes after the IAEAโ€™s head Rafael Grossi returned from a trip to Tehran last week, where he appeared to have made headway.

During the visit, Iran agreed to an IAEA demand to cap its sensitive stock of near weapons-grade uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity.

โ€˜Iran did not start the cycle of provocation โ€” the Western side could, without passing a resolution create the atmosphere for negotiations if it really was after talks,โ€™ the analyst Mohammadi said.

In 2015, Iran and world powers reached an agreement that saw the easing of international sanctions on Tehran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme.

But the United States unilaterally withdrew from the accord in 2018 under then-president Donald Trump and reimposed biting economic sanctions, which prompted Iran to begin rolling back on its own commitments.

On Thursday, Iranโ€™s deputy foreign minister for legal and international affairs Kazem Gharibabadi warned of Iranโ€™s potential next step.

โ€˜Iran had announced in an official letter to European countries that it would withdraw from the NPT if the snapback mechanism was activated, and the Security Council sanctions were reinstated,โ€™ Gharibabadi said in a late-night interview with state TV.

The 2015 deal contains a โ€˜snapbackโ€™ mechanism that can be triggered in case of โ€˜significant non-performanceโ€™ of commitments by Iran.

This would allow many sanctions to be reimposed.

Tehran has since 2021 decreased its cooperation with the agency by deactivating surveillance devices monitoring the nuclear programme and barring UN inspectors.

At the same time, it has ramped up its nuclear activities, including by increasing its stockpiles of enriched uranium and the level of enrichment to 60 per cent.

That level is close, according to the IAEA, to the 90 per cent-plus threshold required for a nuclear warhead and substantially higher than the 3.67 per cent limit it agreed to in 2015.​
 

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts