South Asia Pakistan’s Op Bunyan ‘Successfully Photoshopped’: Asim Munir's Memento To Sharif Fact Checked

South Asia Pakistan’s Op Bunyan ‘Successfully Photoshopped’: Asim Munir's Memento To Sharif Fact Checked
More threads by Krishna with Flute

G  South Asia
Ali ibn Abi Talib<a href="Ali - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> (c. 600 – 661 CE) was the fourth Rashidun caliph who ruled from 656 CE until his assassination in 661, as well as the first Shia Imam. He was the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Born to Abu Talib ibn Abd al-Muttalib and Fatima bint Asad, Ali was raised by his elder cousin Muhammad and was among the first to accept his teachings.

Ali played a pivotal role in the early years of Islam when Muslims were severely persecuted in Mecca. After immigration (hijra) to Medina in 622, Muhammad gave his daughter Fatima to Ali in marriage and swore a pact of brotherhood with him. Ali served as Muhammad's secretary and deputy in this period, and was the flag bearer of his army. Numerous sayings of Muhammad praise Ali, the most controversial of which was uttered in 632 at the Ghadir Khumm, "Whoever I am his mawla, this Ali is his mawla." The interpretation of the polysemous Arabic word mawla is disputed: For Shia Muslims, Muhammad thus invested Ali with his religious and political authority, while Sunni Muslims view this as a mere statement of friendship and rapport. When Muhammad died in the same year, a group of Muslims met in the absence of Ali and appointed Abu Bakr (r. 632–634) as their leader. Ali later relinquished his claims to leadership and resigned from public life during the reigns of Abu Bakr and his successor, Umar (r. 634–644). Even though his advice was occasionally sought, the conflicts between Ali and the first two caliphs are epitomized by his refusal to follow their practices. This refusal cost Ali the caliphate to the benefit of Uthman (r. 644–656), who was thus appointed to succeed Umar by the electoral council. Ali was also highly critical of Uthman, who was widely accused of nepotism and corruption. Yet Ali also repeatedly mediated between the caliph and the provincial dissidents angered by his policies.

Following Uthman's assassination in June 656, Ali was elected caliph in Medina. He immediately faced two separate rebellions, both ostensibly to avenge Uthman: The triumvirate of Talha, Zubayr, both companions of Muhammad, and his widow Aisha captured Basra in Iraq but were defeated by Ali in the Battle of the Camel in 656. Elsewhere, Mu'awiya, whom Ali had just removed from the governorship of Syria, fought against Ali the inconclusive Battle of Siffin in 657, which ended in a failed arbitration process that alienated some of Ali's supporters. These formed the Kharijites, who later terrorized the public and were crushed by Ali in the Battle of Nahrawan in 658. Ali was assassinated in 661 by the Kharijite dissident Ibn Muljam, which paved the way for Mu'awiya to seize power and found the dynastic Umayyad Caliphate.

Ali is revered for his courage, honesty, unbending devotion to Islam, magnanimity, and equal treatment of all Muslims. For his admirers, he has thus become the archetype of uncorrupted Islam and pre-Islamic chivalry. Sunni Muslims regard him as the last of the rashidun (lit. 'rightly-guided') caliphs, while Shia Muslims venerate him as their first imam, that is, the rightful religious and political successor to Muhammad. Ali's place is said to be second only to Muhammad in Shia Muslim culture. The shrine of Ali in Najaf, Iraq, is a major destination for Shia pilgrimage. The legacy of Ali is collected and studied in numerous books, the most famous of which is Nahj al-balagha.
 
The Battle of al-Qadisiyyah<a href="Battle of al-Qadisiyyah - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> (Arabic: مَعْرَكَة ٱلْقَادِسِيَّة Maʿrakat al-Qādisīyah; Persian: نبرد قادسیه Nâbārd-e Qâdisiyeh) took place between the armies of the Rashidun Caliphate and the Sasanian Empire in November 636. It resulted in a decisive victory for the Rashidun army and is considered to be one of the most significant engagements of the Muslim conquest of Persia, and thereby of the early Muslim conquests as a whole. After losing al-Qadisiyyah, the Sasanian army was left unable to defend against the Rashidun siege of Ctesiphon, thus being forced to retreat from all of Mesopotamia. This development enabled further Rashidun offensives into the Persian mainland and culminated in the Sasanian Empire's annexation by 651.

It is widely believed that the Rashidun army's advance on al-Qadisiyyah began on 16 November 636 and continued for the next three days. During the battle, Sasanian troops were thrown into disarray following the death of their general Rostam Farrokhzad under uncertain circumstances. The ensuing collapse of their positions marked a cataclysmic defeat that led to the Rashidun army's seizure of Ctesiphon, which had served as the Persian capital city since the Parthian period.<a href="Battle of al-Qadisiyyah - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a>

The Rashidun Caliphate's success in capturing al-Qadisiyyah was key to conquering the Sasanian province of Asoristan, and was followed by major engagements at Jalula and Nahavand. The battle allegedly saw the establishment of an alliance between the Sasanian Empire and the Byzantine Empire.[<em><a href="Wikipedia:Citation needed - Wikipedia" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2022)">citation needed</span></a></em>] This purported alliance, for the Byzantines, was motivated by the contemporary Rashidun invasion of the Levant and Egypt.

In 2024, scholars and researchers from Durham University and the University of al-Qadisiyyah identified the likely site of the battle to an open field situated approximately 19 kilometres (12 mi) to the south of modern-day Kufa.<a href="Battle of al-Qadisiyyah - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>9<span>]</span></a><a href="Battle of al-Qadisiyyah - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a>
 
@Vsdoc dhimmi "Hussaini" bammans ka batao
I have no idea man. Wo tumhare Hindu hain. You should know no?

Personally I look at the whole fracas following succession of Muhammad as a good thing.

As I've often said on the original forum, in its moment of greatest triumph was born the seed of Islam's eventual split and destruction.

Even the guy who actually led the attack on Persia later lamented that he wished God could have sent down a wall of fire to quarantine Persia from the rest of Islam and the Muslim world.

The actual fire is still to come.

A vengeful fire.
 
Mughals ka kya scene tha, Turko-Mongol or Persiands ?

History is not my strong my strong point.. but whoever the fugg that lot were, fvck em..
Seljuk gaandu moved down from north and east and settled in Iran as refugees basically escaping Han Chinese/ Russians persecution and expulsions.

From Iran they moved into Anatolia and then eventually their eastern wing consolidated into Samarqand and Bukhara from where they eventually attacked India/ Pakistan.

They all got persianized and even adopted Irans language and civilization.

In Pakistan our jahil pendu think the Mughals spoke punjabi or mirpuri……😝……and were muzlim…..😝

Taimur lund was not even muzlim when he started attacking India. 😝
 

Latest Posts

Back