New Tweets

[๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ] Abolition of RAB and DGFI

G Bangladesh Defense
[๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฉ] Abolition of RAB and DGFI
1
53
More threads by Saif

Saif

Senior Member
Messages
17,442
Likes
8,380
Nation

Residence

Axis Group

Ex-army chief for DGFI, RAB abolition

RAW officials used meeting room at DGFI headquarters as office, he tells ICT-1

Staff Correspondent 09 February, 2026, 15:50

1770686909799.webp


Iqbal Karim Bhuiyan. | File photo

Former army chief and retired general Iqbal Karim Bhuiyan on Monday testified before International Crimes Tribunal-1, calling for the immediate abolition of the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence and the Rapid Action Battalion.

If RAB cannot be abolished, the members of the army should be withdrawn from the elite force.

The three-judge tribunal, chaired by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, adjourned the hearing until February 18 as his cross-examination remained incomplete.

Iqbal was testifying for the second day in the enforced disappearance case against former major general Ziaul Ahsan, a former additional director general of the RAB.

He said that the DGFI had lost its legitimacy after creating a โ€˜bad cultureโ€™ of secret detention centres, known as โ€˜Aynagharโ€™, and subjecting individuals to inhumane torture in the name of interrogation by keeping them detained for an indefinite period.

Iqbal said that, during his tenure, he learnt that some individuals from Indian intelligence agency, RAW, used to vist DGFI offices regularly under the patronage of former prime minister Sheikh Hasinaโ€™s defence adviser, retired major general Tarique Ahmed Siddique.

He said that RAW officials were allowed to use one of seven meeting rooms at DGFI headquarters as an office.

โ€˜They prepared lists identifying some people as extremists and supplied those lists to the DGFI,โ€™ he said, adding that he did not know whether DGFI acted on the lists.

He said that some people thought that he was taking a position against the army, but he explained that the army became โ€˜pollutedโ€™ by extrajudicial practices.

He narrated that a junior officer who returned from RAB told him that he was involved in killing six people, of whom two were directly killed by him.

The army officer said that he received Tk 10,000 and donated it to a mosque, which Iqbal said showed guilt.

He also mentioned that a major who killed suspects accused of raping and killing a woman while she was on her way to home from workplace at night.

He said that the officer justified the killings by claiming that the suspects had no right to live as they were involved in anti-social activities.

Iqbal said that he had later seen the officer posing with Colonel Ziaul Ahsan in a social media post and the incident frustrated him.

โ€˜My serving period was very painful due to RABโ€™s activities,โ€™ Iqbal said.

โ€˜The pain of my failure to do anything over RAB activities used to obsess me,โ€™ he said and added that time had come to complete those which he could not.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Breach in armed forces intelligence must be probed

THE involvement of the Rapid Action Battalion and the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence in grave rights violations, including enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killing, were reported before. But, the scale and gravity of the crimes under the deposed Awami League regime were shockingly revealed in the deposition of former army chief Iqbal Karim Bhuiyan. Giving his deposition in International Crimes Tribunal 1 on February 9 as the first prosecution witness in a crimes against humanity case against the relieved major general Ziaul Ahsan, the former army chief described how the deposed prime minister and her government exploited state security agencies to consolidate control over the armed forces, suppress political opponents and channel widespread corruption through national projects. Even more shocking in his deposition was the confirmation of long-circulating rumours that foreign intelligence, particularly Indiaโ€™s Research and Analysis Wing, had operational access to armed forces intelligence and its office. Such an allegation indicates that the DGFI had acted against its mandate, which is to provide tactical support for the armed forces and conduct counter-intelligence, rather than offer assistance to a foreign intelligence agency. The allegation warrants a credible investigation and strict action against the errant officers who acted against sovereign interests of Bangladesh.Bangladesh cultural tours

The former army chiefโ€™s deposition gives a horrifying account of the criminalisation of both the agencies, revealing that professional army officers returned from the battalion transformed into what he described as professional killers. He cited examples of battalion officials receiving monetary compensation and other rewards for killing unarmed โ€˜suspects.โ€™ His statement confirms what families of the victims have for long reported. The Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances in its report also substantiated prima facie evidence of torture in 253 cases of enforced disappearances and established compelling evidence of gross rights violations committed by the law enforcement agencies. What his deposition emphasised, however, was not just the trial of errant intelligence personnel but also the policy decision to involve soldiers trained under the โ€˜one bullet, one enemyโ€™ doctrine in civilian law enforcement, calling for the abolition of the two agencies. The armed forces intelligence has clearly deviated from its mandate, becoming a force for domestic surveillance and gathering intelligence on citizens. This deviation and the resulting murderous shift in institutional culture do not, however, diminish the essential need for the armed forces to collect military intelligence.

The political party that would form the government after the February 12 elections should, therefore, consider reforming and overhauling the armed forces intelligence services, prioritising the investigation of the reported breach of intelligence protocol and ensuring exemplary action against all who provided access for the Research and Analysis Wing, compromising national interests for partisan gains.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Respond

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle