[🇧🇩] Bangladesh-Pakistan Relation---Can we look beyond 1971?

[Krishna with Flute]

It may or may not have ended, but the roads are still open. Or if closed, can be re-opened.

The need for the Tajikistan-Kyrgyzstan-China-Pakistan area at the top of CPEC to have a sea-port outlet has not gone away.

This is one of the many reasons why Pakistan is geo-politically important to China's land locked central Asian areas and other countries like Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and even Uzbekistan.

View attachment 8530

I asked you to take a look at the Wiki page but you have no interest in discussing specifics.

Anything is important only till it has utility and no substitute is available. CPEC is now dead and can not be revived.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

Because of a false narrative of Islamic brotherhood, Pakistan tried to forge many such brotherhood with many Islamic nations which did not work. Any artificial and unnatural relation does not work. They are bound to fail. They try to ditch their real brothers having blood relations and tried to befriend with those who looted and oppress their country. This artificial brotherhood failed badly. Anyway, there is nothing wrong in trying something. If you are unwilling to learn something in soft way, nature will make you learn in hard way.

 

[Bilal9]

Anything is important only till it has utility and no substitute is available. CPEC is now dead and can not be revived.

Well Pakistani brothers and sisters know best.

@ThunderCat bhai - what are your thoughts please?

 

[Bilal9]

Anything is important only till it has utility and no substitute is available. CPEC is now dead and can not be revived.

You refuse to take a look at that map and are acting (and commenting) like a propaganda bot.

Those land-locked countries and Western Chinese areas don't have a need to access sea routes through a port like Gwadar port? Sea access is not important?

Yes or no?

There is no credible or practical alternative.

 

[Bilal9]

Because of a false narrative of Islamic brotherhood, Pakistan tried to forge many such brotherhood with many Islamic nations which did not work. Any artificial and unnatural relation does not work. They are bound to fail. They try to ditch their real brothers having blood relations and tried to befriend with those who looted and oppress their country. This artificial brotherhood failed badly. Anyway, there is nothing wrong in trying something. If you are unwilling to learn something in soft way, nature will make you learn in hard way.

The narrative of Islamic brotherhood is not false.

It may ebb or flow, but it is ultimately reality, even more so today than ever.

You will not comprehend this, living in a majority Hindu country.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The narrative of Islamic brotherhood is not false.

It may ebb or flow, but it is ultimately reality, even more so today than ever.

You will not comprehend this, living in a majority Hindu country and being its Hindutva cheerleader.

That is why Saudi and UAE supports Israel against Iran. Iran hangs Sunni clerics saudi beheads shias.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

You refuse to take a look at that map and are acting (and commenting) like a propaganda bot.

Those land-locked countries and Western Chinese areas don't have a need to access sea routes through a port like Gwadar port? Sea access is not important?

Yes or no?

There is no credible or practical alternative.

No.

It is abandoned a long back. I challange you to quote any 5 major projects completed in CPEC in last 3 years.

 

[Saif]

Bangladesh, Pakistan discuss next round of foreign secretary-level consultations

Bangladesh and Pakistan, on Thursday, discussed holding the next round of foreign secretary-level consultations. The issue was discussed when the High Commissioner of Pakistan to Bangladesh Syed Ahmed Maroof met the Foreign Secretary Md Jashim Uddin at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Strengtheni

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

Bangladesh, Pakistan discuss next round of foreign secretary-level consultations
Published :
Sep 19, 2024 23:24
Updated :
Sep 19, 2024 23:24

Bangladesh and Pakistan, on Thursday, discussed holding the next round of foreign secretary-level consultations.

The issue was discussed when the High Commissioner of Pakistan to Bangladesh Syed Ahmed Maroof met the Foreign Secretary Md Jashim Uddin at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Strengthening cooperation in areas of trade, and commerce, enhancing people-to-people contacts, and the issue of the Rohingyas also featured in their discussion.

They also discussed tapping the potential of SAARC, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The High Commissioner congratulated the Foreign Secretary on assuming his new responsibilities, reports UNB.

The Foreign Secretary conveyed thanks for the congratulatory message from the Prime Minister of Pakistan to the Chief Adviser.

He also discussed the background of the recent mass uprising and the priorities of the Interim Government.​

 

[ThunderCat]

Well Pakistani brothers and sisters know best.

@ThunderCat bhai - what are your thoughts please?

I was against CPEC for environmental reasons, not because I oppose trade between China & Pakistan. This craze Pakistanis have for industrializing every part of their country is sick & destructive.

Ecology always wins over economy. Like it or not.

 

[Saif]

I was against CPEC for environmental reasons, not because I oppose trade between China & Pakistan. This craze Pakistanis have for industrializing ever part of their country is sick & destructive.

Ecology always wins over economy. Like it or not.

I thought China already invested $46 billion in CPEC, no?