[🇧🇩] Bangladesh Police and Rapid Action Battalion

[🇧🇩] Bangladesh Police and Rapid Action Battalion
189
8K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Police should act, prevent crime

SYED FATTAHUL ALIM

Published :
Jun 15, 2026 23:25
Updated :
Jun 15, 2026 23:25

1781590062899.webp


Of late, the violent crimes has not only increased in number, but their nature has also changed. Consider the sharp rise in crimes involving rape and murder of the vilest kind in the victims' supposedly secure homes, incidents of shooting to death in broad daylight, vigilantes beating suspected outlaws to death, eruption of gang wars leading to shootouts and resulting deaths, to mention but a few of the grave offences taking place about every day. Records with Bangladesh Police show that between January and May this year (2026), the number of murders committed was1,452, while that of kidnapping was 437. The cases of robbery or burglary are not included here. On the other hand, in nine months since July 2025, cases of repression against women and children saw their highest rise in April, 2026, marking a 35.4 per cent surge over the previous month of March. However, experts often question the veracity of the crime statistics produced by the authorities concerned. For, year-on-year, comparison in crime rates usually shows a declining trend, which may not quite reflect the real-world situation.

However, the recent spike in the incidence of violent crimes such as hacking to death of a mother and her teenage daughter in their house in the Anowara upazila of Chattogram by unidentified criminals, or the killing of a youth with sharp weapon after calling him out of his houses by one of the victim's close acquaintances in Khulna city in broad daylight, or the shooting and critically injuring of the listed criminal, Yasin Khan Palash or Kayla Palash in broad daylight last Friday near Rampura TV centre in the Hatirjheel area of the capital city, shooting to death of BNP leader Rafiqul Islam on the same day in the Labonchora area in Khulna-it all loks like an unleashed demon that has gone on a killing spree. However, committing deadly violence by desecrating a place of worship is rare in this country. Perhaps, criminals have by now grown bolder and are no more respecters of religious shrines. Last Sunday during the Fazr prayers at the West Kashipur Power Plant Jam-e-Masjid in Daulatpur of Khulna city, assailants entered the mosque, opened fire and injured two individuals, one of whom was reportedly in critical condition.

The critically injured was learnt to be the secretary of the mosque committee. Whatever the motive of the assailants, the choice of a mosque to attack their targeted persons shows that it is an instance of perpetrating crime with no holds barred. Why have the violence-mongers or criminals turned so desperate? Is it just that we are witnessing a complete breakdown in law and order during a government that is hardly three months in office? Is Home Minister Salahuddin Ahmed aware that all such deadly crimes are taking place under his watch? The patten of crime points to something sinister about them. It appears, all the criminal activities from the incidents of rape and killing of women and children to hacking of women and girls in their homes to gunning down of members of crime syndicates to shooting of political leaders and so on are well-orchestrated. The government seems to be either clueless about what lies behind the spate of murders and rapes or is considering those as nothing serious. If the government is too complacent and unconcerned about these violent crimes, the victims and their families cannot just resign to fate and accept the tragedies befalling them as normal. So, the government has a duty to protect the citizens from the machete-wielding and gun-toting gangs, who have, as though, gone on a rampage through the country. It is not enough that law enforcement department is quick to act after a deadly crime has taken place. In fact, it is pointless to shut the proverbial stable door after the horse has bolted. The police and their intelligence networks should rather be more proactive and be able to save lives by preventing serious crimes from happening in the first place.​
 

Police step out in new colours as uniform rollout begins

District units adopt dark blue, metropolitan police light olive, with khaki trousers for all

Star Online Report

1782951811467.webp

Photo: Courtesy

Bangladesh Police introduced new uniforms on Wednesday, with some officers beginning duty in dark blue or light olive shirts paired with khaki trousers.

The new uniforms were visible at the inauguration of the newly-built Barkau Police Camp under the Purbachal New City Project, where Inspector General of Police (IGP) Ali Hossain Fakir wore a dark blue shirt with khaki trousers, while Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) Commissioner Mosleh Uddin Ahmed wore a light olive shirt with khaki trousers.

DMP Media and Public Relations Additional Deputy Commissioner Niaz Mehedi told The Daily Star that officers have started wearing the new uniforms from Wednesday, though distribution is still ongoing. The rollout will be gradual, he said.

The Police Headquarters issued a notification on June 18 revising the dress code and reinstating dark blue and light olive shirts. It also introduced khaki trousers for all personnel, the first such change since 2004.

According to the notification, district police and most units will wear dark blue shirts, while metropolitan police will wear light olive shirts. Trousers for all personnel will be khaki.

The revised dress code will not apply to Armed Police Battalion (APBn), Special Security and Protection Battalion (SPBn), Special Branch, Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and Rapid Action Battalion (Rab), whose existing uniforms will remain unchanged.

The uniform change follows ongoing discussions on police reform, including a decision last year to revise the dress code. The previous iron-grey uniform was introduced on November 25 last year.​
 

Government orders 33 senior police officers into retirement

bdnews24.com

Published :
Jul 05, 2026 23:08
Updated :
Jul 05, 2026 23:14

The government has ordered 33 senior police officers, including deputy inspectors general (DIGs) and additional DIGs, into retirement.

The home ministry announced the decision in a notification on Sunday.

Most of the officers were serving as superintendents of police (SPs) in different districts during the 2018 general election.​

1783301297535.webp


1783301332869.webp
 

Govt transfers four DIGs
United News of Bangladesh . Dhaka 21 July, 2026, 22:01

1784678465018.webp


Representational image | File photo

The government has transferred four deputy inspectors general of the police in the latest reshuffle in the police administration.

Besides, an earlier transfer order involving DIG Miah Masud Karim of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has been cancelled.

The Ministry of Home Affairs issued a notification in this regard on Tuesday.

According to the notification, Mymensingh Range DIG Md Ataul Kibria has been transferred and posted as DIG of the CID, while Khulna Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mohammad Zahidul Hasan replaced Kibria.

Sylhet Metropolitan Police (SMP) Commissioner Abdul Quddus Chowdhury has been posted as Chattogram Range DIG, while DIG Sarwar Murshed Shamim of the Police Headquarters has been appointed as SMP commissioner.

The notification also said the earlier order issued on June 28 transferring CID's DIG Miah Masud Karim to the Armed Police Battalion has been cancelled.​
 

Govt sends 17 police officers, including DIGs, ADIGs, into retirement

Staff Correspondent
Dhaka

1784849394975.webp

Home Ministry logo

The government has retired 17 senior police officers from public service, including three officers holding the rank of Deputy Inspector General (DIG).

The decision was announced in a gazette notification issued today, Thursday, by the Police-1 Branch of the Public Security Division under the Ministry of Home Affairs.

The notification, signed by Senior Secretary Monzur Morshed Chowdhury, states that the officers have been retired in the public interest under Section 45 of the Government Service Act, 2018.

Those retired include three DIGs, 12 additional DIGs and two officers holding the rank of Superintendent of Police (SP).

According to the notification, the retired officers include Highway Police DIG Mohammad Abdullahil Baki, Bangladesh Police Academy (Sardah) DIG Md Walid Hossain, and CID DIG Sana Shaminur Rahman.

The additional DIGs retired are Mohammad Sarwar Hossain and Rebecca Sultana of the CID; Bidhan Tripura and Sultana Nazma Hossain of the Tourist Police; AKM Iqbal Hossain of the Police Staff College; Saheli Ferdous of the Armed Police Battalion (APBn); Mohammad Tabarak Ullah of the Bangladesh Police Academy, Sardah; Hasina Rahman of Police Telecom; Faisal Mahmud of the Central Police Hospital under Police Headquarters; Kaniz Fatema of Police Headquarters; Jesmin Begum of the Naval Police; and DMP Additional DIG Mosammat Farida Yasmin.

The list also includes Mohammad Habibur Rahman, deputy commissioner of the Rangpur Metropolitan Police, and Abdur Rahim Shah Chowdhury, superintendent of police of TDS. The notification states that the retired officers will receive retirement benefits in accordance with the applicable rules. It also says that the order, issued in the public interest, takes immediate effect.​
 

Renaming Rab as SRB is not reforming

Proposed law risks preserving the very structures that enabled Rab’s abuses

1787096971015.webp

VISUAL: STAR

A post-uprising government’s recognition that retaining the Rapid Action Battalion (Rab)—a security force that has earned global notoriety for its egregious disregard for human rights—is no longer tenable is a welcome first step towards restoring the rule of law. According to an official release, the cabinet on Monday approved a draft law titled “Special Response Battalion (SRB) Act, 2026,” which, if enacted, would effectively rename Rab as SRB. But rebranding without substantive internal reforms falls short of the expectations of human rights advocates and the victims of past abuses committed by Rab.

Reportedly, the new force would be a specialised unit of the police—essentially the same status Rab had on paper. Like Rab, SRB would continue to be headed by a serving additional IGP and remain under the command of the IGP. The draft law also provides for the transfer of Rab’s manpower, orders, powers, facilities, funds, assets, accounts, records and other property to SRB. Most strikingly, members of the armed forces would continue to serve in SRB on deputation. Cases filed by Rab would also continue as though they had been filed by SRB. Existing Rab regulations would likewise remain in force, with necessary adaptations, until rules for the new force are framed. In other words, what we are seeing is textbook repackaging, which could allow the force to continue operating with little or no meaningful accountability.

These, one may recall, are precisely the concerns that led the United States to impose sanctions on senior Rab commanders as well as the force itself. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which investigated killings and other violations committed by security forces during the July uprising, recommended, among other measures, “dissolving the Rapid Action Battalion and return personnel not involved in serious violations to their respective units.”

The proposed law and the conversion of Rab into a new force through the wholesale transfer of existing personnel, including those serving on deputation from other forces, clearly depart from these recommendations. Thousands of victims of abuses allegedly committed by Rab members, including so-called “crossfire” killings and enforced disappearances, are still waiting for justice and compensation. Allowing personnel implicated in such abuses to continue their law-enforcement roles under a new institutional identity would be deeply unjust. The policing duties assigned to SRB also appear inconsistent with the rationale for creating a specialised force, which should be assigned clearly defined special duties.

The government, in response to concerns of abuse, may argue that it has introduced a safeguard by proposing a multiparty grievance-redressal committee to handle complaints. But this mechanism is also problematic. Unless the committee is genuinely independent, adequately empowered and protected from the influence of security forces, it is unlikely to provide credible investigations or effective remedies.

We, therefore, call upon the government to undertake broader consultations on the draft legislation and make necessary changes before proceeding. Such consultations could include open hearings before the parliamentary standing committees. The abolition of Rab must be substantive, not cosmetic. It must be accompanied by credible accountability for past crimes, justice and reparations for victims, and safeguards against the continued militarisation of a civilian law-enforcement institution.​
 

Latest Posts

Back