[🇧🇩] Banking System in Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] Banking System in Bangladesh
345
12K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Fewer bank dividends under new policy signal a weaker financial ecosystem

MD. ZAKARIA

Published :
May 05, 2026 00:29
Updated :
May 05, 2026 00:33

1777946350988.webp


Bangladesh's banking sector is facing growing pressure as more than half of the banks failed to declare dividends for the year 2025. This situation reflects both the weak financial condition of many banks and the impact of stricter regulatory measures introduced by Bangladesh Bank.

Under DOS Circular No. 01 dated 13 March 2025, Bangladesh Bank introduced a new "Dividend Declaration Policy against Shares." The main objective of this policy is to strengthen the financial stability of banks before they distribute profits to shareholders.

According to this circular, banks must meet several conditions to declare dividends. First, they must fully comply with the Bank Company Act and all regulatory requirements. If there is any shortfall in loan or investment provisioning, the bank is not allowed to declare dividends. Banks must also maintain the required Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR). Failure to maintain these requirements disqualifies them from distributing dividends.

The policy also places strong emphasis on loan quality. If a bank's non-performing loan (NPL) ratio exceeds 10 percent, it cannot declare any dividend. At present, around 29 banks have NPL ratios above 29 percent, which is one of the main reasons behind the widespread failure to declare dividends this year.

The policy also places strong emphasis on the Dividend Payout Ratio, which is calculated as the declared dividend divided by net profit after tax. Bangladesh Bank has set strict limits on dividend distribution to ensure that banks retain sufficient earnings to strengthen their capital base. Under the regulation, no bank can declare dividends exceeding 30 per cent of its paid-up capital or 50 per cent or 40 per cent of its net profit-whichever is lower-subject to meeting the requirements for adequate loan and investment provisioning and maintaining a Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of at least 15 per cent or between 12.50 per cent and less than 15 per cent, as applicable. Furthermore, banks with a CAR above 10 per cent but below 12.50 per cent are permitted to declare only stock dividends, not cash dividends. These provisions ensure that only financially sound banks with adequate capital strength are allowed to distribute dividends, while relatively weaker banks retain earnings to improve their financial position.

The circular further states that if a bank receives any regulatory forbearance, such as deferred provisioning benefits, it cannot declare dividends during that period. This rule ensures that weak banks are not allowed to distribute profits without first addressing their financial vulnerabilities.

Due to these strict conditions, only 18 out of 52 banks declared dividends in 2025. Among the 36 listed banks, only 16 announced dividends. This has also negatively affected investor confidence in the stock market, as bank shares are traditionally considered attractive for regular dividend income.

Among the better-performing banks, several declared the maximum allowed dividend of 30 per cent. These include BRAC Bank, City Bank, Pubali Bank, Dutch-Bangla Bank, Prime Bank, and Uttara Bank. Jamuna Bank declared a 29 per cent dividend, while Eastern Bank declared 28 per cent. NCC Bank announced 21 per cent, and Bank Asia declared 17 per cent. Shahjalal Islami Bank and Trust Bank both declared 13 per cent, while Mutual Trust Bank (MTB) declared 12 per cent. Southeast Bank and Dhaka Bank each declared 10 per cent dividends, while Midland Bank declared 6 per cent. Outside listed banks, Community Bank and Bengal Commercial Bank also declared dividends.

However, many banks failed to declare any dividend. Islami Bank Bangladesh PLC, once a strong 'A' category bank, has now moved to the 'Z' category, indicating severe financial distress. Other banks that did not declare dividends include IFIC Bank, Standard Bank, UCB, Mercantile Bank, AB Bank, Al-Arafah Islami Bank, ICB Islamic Bank, National Bank, NRB Bank, NRBC Bank, ONE Bank, Premier Bank, and South Bangla Agriculture and Commerce Bank.

Some banks have also undergone mergers due to weak financial conditions. These include EXIM Bank, First Security Islami Bank, Social Islami Bank, Union Bank, and Global Islami Bank. These institutions are no longer operating independently, which has further impacted the overall banking landscape.

Among non-listed banks, Bangladesh Commerce Bank, Meghna Bank, Madhumati Bank, Padma Bank, and Shimanto Bank did not declare dividends. Citizens Bank earned profit but did not distribute dividends, possibly to strengthen its capital position.

State-owned banks are also under significant financial pressure. Sonali Bank, Janata Bank, Agrani Bank, Rupali Bank, BASIC Bank, Bangladesh Development Bank Limited (BDBL), Bangladesh Krishi Bank (BKB), Rajshahi Krishi Unnayan Bank (RAKUB), and Probashi Kallyan Bank were unable to declare dividends to the government.

One positive development is that all banks completed their financial statements on time this year. Bangladesh Bank also provided limited support by relaxing provisioning requirements for funds stuck in merged banks. The current situation clearly indicates that the banking sector remains under stress. High default loans, weak governance, and poor lending practices continue to be major challenges.

If more banks were able to declare dividends, it would have strengthened investor confidence and improved the overall financial ecosystem. Regular dividend distribution plays an important role in attracting investors and maintaining trust in the banking sector.

In conclusion, the new dividend policy is a necessary step to strengthen the banking sector. However, it also highlights the structural weaknesses of many banks. To improve the situation, banks must reduce non-performing loans, enhance governance, and strictly follow regulatory guidelines. Only then can the financial ecosystem of Bangladesh become more stable and resilient.

Md. Zakaria, First Assistant Vice President, CRM-CMSME Division, NCC Bank PLC.​
 

Rethinking Bangladesh's banking profession through the lens of global best practices

Shahidul Alam Swapan

Published :
May 05, 2026 23:37
Updated :
May 05, 2026 23:37

1778024610137.webp


The banking sector is the lifeblood of any modern economy. It channels savings into investments, manages financial risks, and sustains economic growth. Yet for decades, Bangladesh's banking industry has struggled with a persistent and deeply rooted problem a workforce that lacks specialised professional knowledge. In response to this structural weakness, Bangladesh Bank has taken a bold and consequential step by amending its earlier circular on the Banking Professional Examination, commonly known as the Banking Diploma. Effective from January 2026, any officer of a bank or financial institution seeking appointment at a higher position in another bank must pass the Banking Diploma examination conducted by the Institute of Bankers, Bangladesh (IBB). Officers with 15 or more years of experience at the Senior Officer level, however, are exempt from this requirement.

This directive raises a question of profound importance: is it a well-reasoned reform rooted in global best practices, or merely a regulatory formality that risks falling short in practice? A careful examination of the policy, set against the backdrop of international banking standards, reveals both its considerable merit and the challenges that must be addressed to make it truly transformative.

To appreciate the significance of this directive, one must first understand the problem it is designed to address. Bangladesh's banking sector has long been characterised by appointments based on personal connections, political influence, and institutional loyalty rather than demonstrated professional competence. The consequences have been severe a steady rise in non-performing loans, recurring financial scandals, weak credit assessment practices, and a general erosion of public trust in the banking system.

A significant proportion of bank officers in Bangladesh hold general university degrees with little or no formal training in banking law, credit risk, financial regulation, or monetary policy. When such officers are promoted or transferred across institutions, the knowledge deficit travels with them. The Banking Diploma, comprising the Junior Associate of the Institute of Bankers Bangladesh (JAIBB) and the Associate of the Institute of Bankers Bangladesh (AIBB), is specifically designed to address this gap. It equips officers with structured, institution-specific knowledge that a general degree simply cannot provide. In this context, making the diploma a prerequisite for inter-bank promotions is not merely logical it is long overdue.

The United Kingdom offers one of the most instructive examples of how professional qualifications can reshape a banking culture. The Chartered Banker Institute (CBI) administers a tiered qualification framework comprising the Certificated Professional Banker (CCBI), the Associate Chartered Banker (ACBI), and the prestigious Chartered Banker (MCBI) designation. While these qualifications are not legally mandated, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enforces the Senior Manager and Certification Regime (SMCR), which requires that individuals in senior banking roles demonstrate fitness and propriety before appointment. In practice, this has made professional certification a de facto requirement for career advancement.

What makes the UK model particularly noteworthy is that it is market-driven rather than regulatory-driven. Banks themselves demand qualified professionals because the cost of incompetence in the form of regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and financial losses is simply too high. Bangladesh has not yet developed this self-regulating professional culture, which is precisely why the central bank's regulatory intervention is not only justified but necessary.

The United States takes a different but equally rigorous approach. Rather than a single overarching banking diploma, the American system relies on a rich ecosystem of role-specific certifications. The Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation is considered the gold standard for investment and asset management professionals. The Certified Financial Planner (CFP) credential governs financial advisory roles, while the Certified Risk Manager (CRM) qualification is essential for those managing institutional risk. This granular, role-based approach ensures that professionals are not just broadly educated in banking, but deeply expert in their specific domain.

For Bangladesh, this offers an important lesson. The current Banking Diploma framework, while valuable, is relatively uniform in its scope. As the sector matures, Bangladesh Bank and IBB should consider developing specialised modules covering areas such as Islamic banking, green finance, digital banking, and credit risk management so that the diploma evolves from a general qualification into a genuinely specialised professional credential.

Perhaps no country in the world offers a more compelling model for banking professionalism than Switzerland. As the home of UBS, and the globally respected Swiss National Bank, Switzerland has built a banking culture where professional excellence is not aspirational it is foundational. The Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) oversees the Swiss Certificate in Banking and Finance (SCBF) and the Swiss Diploma in Banking and Finance, both of which are widely recognised as benchmarks of professional competence. The Swiss Finance Institute (SFI) further offers advanced programmes for senior banking professionals, covering areas ranging from quantitative finance to regulatory compliance.

What truly distinguishes Switzerland is its celebrated Dual Education System. Under this model, banking professionals simultaneously pursue practical on-the-job training and formal academic instruction. A young banker does not simply study theory in a classroom and then enter the workforce they learn and work in parallel, with each experience reinforcing the other. This integration of knowledge and practice produces professionals who are not only theoretically sound but operationally effective from the very beginning of their careers.

Switzerland's financial regulator, FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority), enforces a rigorous Fit and Proper standard for senior appointments. Before any individual can assume a leadership role in a Swiss bank, FINMA scrutinises their professional qualifications, ethical record, and technical competence. Crucially, FINMA also recognises extensive practical experience as a valid alternative to formal qualifications a principle that directly mirrors Bangladesh Bank's 15-year exemption clause.

Bangladesh would do well to draw inspiration from the Swiss model, not merely by mandating a diploma, but by working towards a system where learning and professional practice are genuinely integrated rather than treated as separate obligations.

Germany's approach to banking professionalism is deeply embedded in its broader vocational education philosophy. The IHK Certificate in Banking and Finance is a widely respected credential that forms the foundation of a banking career in Germany. France similarly maintains the Certificat de Compétences en Banque et Finance (CCBF) as a standard entry-level qualification. Across the European Union, the European Banking Federation (EBF) promotes Continuing Professional Development (CPD) as an ongoing obligation for all banking professionals not a one-time credential, but a lifelong commitment to learning.

This culture of continuous learning is perhaps the most important lesson Bangladesh can draw from Europe. The Banking Diploma should not be viewed as a box to tick on the way to a promotion. It should be the beginning of a professional journey, one that continues through regular training, updated knowledge, and ongoing engagement with the evolving landscape of global finance.

One of the most thoughtful aspects of Bangladesh Bank's directive is the exemption granted to officers with 15 or more years of experience at the Senior Officer level. This provision reflects a mature and balanced understanding of what professional competence truly means. Formal qualifications are important, but they are not the only measure of expertise. A banker who has spent a decade and a half navigating credit decisions, managing client relationships, and weathering financial crises has accumulated a depth of practical wisdom that no examination can fully capture.

This principle is well recognised internationally. The Chartered Banker Institute in the UK maintains an Experiential Route that allows seasoned professionals to gain recognition based on their career achievements. Switzerland's FINMA similarly accepts demonstrated experience as a valid basis for senior appointments. By incorporating this exemption, Bangladesh Bank has avoided the trap of rigid credentialism and struck a more equitable balance between formal education and lived professional experience.

The directive's intent is sound, but its success will depend entirely on the quality of its implementation. Several critical challenges must be addressed with urgency. The IBB examination syllabus must be rigorously updated to reflect the realities of modern banking. Topics such as fintech, digital payments, cybersecurity, environmental finance, and algorithmic risk management are reshaping the global banking landscape. A diploma that does not engage with these developments risks producing officers who are qualified on paper but unprepared for the challenges of contemporary banking.

The examination infrastructure also requires significant strengthening. Currently, examinations are held only twice a year. As the number of candidates grows in response to the new directive, the existing system may struggle to cope, leading to bottlenecks and delays that frustrate career progression. Online examination platforms and more frequent testing windows should be introduced without delay. Furthermore, banks themselves must be required to invest in preparing their officers for the diploma. Corporate training programmes, study leave, and financial support for examination fees should become standard practice across the industry.

Bangladesh Bank's directive is a meaningful and well-directed step, but it should be seen as the beginning of a larger transformation rather than an end in itself. The ultimate goal must be to build a banking sector where professional excellence is not compelled by regulation alone, but driven by a genuine culture of learning, accountability, and pride in expertise. When Bangladesh's bankers come to view their professional qualifications not as a bureaucratic hurdle but as a mark of distinction as their counterparts in London, New York, Zurich, and Frankfurt do the sector will have truly come of age.

Measured against the standards of the world's most sophisticated banking systems, Bangladesh Bank's directive stands as a rational, timely, and necessary reform. The United Kingdom, the United States, Switzerland, and Germany have each demonstrated, in their own way, that professional competence is the cornerstone of a trustworthy and resilient banking sector. Bangladesh is now moving in the same direction. The path ahead requires not just enforcement, but investment in curriculum, infrastructure, training, and above all, in the belief that a well-qualified banker is not a cost, but the greatest asset any financial institution can possess.

Shahidul Alam Swapan, Switzerland-based private banking and financial crime compliance expert, columnist, and poet.​
 

Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom