🇧🇩 - BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense | World Defense Forum
Reply

🇧🇩 BDR Mutiny---An Irreparable Damage to Bangladesh's First Line of Defense

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saif
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 57
  • Views Views 2K
G Bangladesh Defense Forum

Saif

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2024
Messages
6,094
Reaction score
2,147
Origin

Residence

Axis Group

15 YEARS OF BDR MUTINY​

No end to wait for justice​

Judge shortage holds back hearing of appeals against conviction, 283 in jail after acquittal of murder charges​

Muktadir Rashid and M Moneruzzaman | Published: 00:34, Feb 25,2024


facebook sharing button
226321_173.jpg

twitter sharing button

Families of the victims as well as the accused soldiers still cry for justice as appeals against convictions in the murder case for the February 25–26, 2009 mutiny in the border force are still pending with the Appellate Division, while a case under the explosives act is pending with the trial court.

Justice into the killings of 75 people, mostly army officers deputed in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles, has not been delivered even after 15 years of the mutiny in the border force, while many former soldiers and civilians have been languishing in jail for years and dozens have died pending trials.

Those who were acquitted by a trial court in November 2013 of the murder charge have been in jail as another case related to explosive substances is still pending with the trial court.

The families of the accused and convicts said at least 48 people have died in jail custody since the trial started, while the plot and plotters are yet to be identified.
‘Many questions about the incident are yet to be answered,’ said retired Lieutenant Colonel Mustafizur Rahman, who investigated the incident during his posting in army intelligence and later left the job and the country.

He said that their investigation could not identify many perpetrators.

Family members of the accused and convicts said that they were devastated by the event and its aftermath, and they wanted immediate disposal of the trials pending both in the Supreme Court and trial court.

The shortage of Appellate Division judges caused the delay in holding hearings on 71 appeals filed by the government and the convicts, according to attorney general AM Amin Uddin.

‘A special bench with at least four judges will be needed to hear and dispose of the large volume of appeals,’ Amin told reporters at his office on Thursday.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred BDR soldiers took arms against their officers deputed from the army at Durbar Hall during their annual gathering at the paramilitary headquarters in Dhaka, leaving 75 people—57 army officers, two wives of army officers, nine BDR soldiers, five civilians, an army soldier, and a police constable—killed.
Border guard special courts sentenced 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases—one filed for the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act—are still pending with the court.

A case filed under the Explosive Substances Act against 833 BDR personnel and a civilian is pending with the Dhaka Metropolitan Sessions Judge Court, and 273 of the 1,344 prosecution witnesses have so far been examined, said deputy chief prosecutor Sheikh Baharul Islam.

Only 18 prosecution witnesses were examined between February 2023 and February 2024, according to a court document.

The appeals filed by death-row convicts against their sentences and another by the government against the acquittal of some soldiers by the High Court in the murder case await an Appellate Division hearing.

Attorney general Amin said that the special bench required for the pending hearings could not be constituted unless new judges were appointed to the Appellate Division.
Two major cases were investigated jointly by the Criminal Investigation Department, and the trial started in 2011 against 850 riflemen and civilians.

Amid the simultaneous trial, the trial court continued the trial of the case filed for murder and other offences, slowing down proceedings in the explosives case.

On November 5, 2013, additional sessions judge Akhtaruzzaman, who was later elevated to the High Court as judge, pronounced the verdict in the murder case, sentencing 151 soldiers and civilian Zakir Hossain to death.

The court also jailed 160 soldiers, including late Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Nasiruddin Pintu, local Awami League leader and retired BDR subedar Md Torab Ali, for life terms, and 256 others for varying terms.

It acquitted 278 people. Four others died before the verdict.

In November 2017, the special High Court bench of Justice Md Shawkat Hossain, Justice Md Abu Zafor Siddique, and Justice Md Nazrul Islam Talukder upheld the death sentences of 139 soldiers. It commuted the death sentences of seven soldiers and Md Zakir Hossain, then a local Awami League leader, to life in jail.

The court acquitted four soldiers of the charges, and BDR deputy assistant director Habibur Rahman died in jail custody in February 2014 while his appeal against the death sentence was pending with the High Court.

The High Court upheld the life terms of 146 BDR personnel and acquitted 12 others of their life terms. Two others died during the pendency of their appeals.

Defence lawyers and family members said that a total of 283 acquitted people and 190 others, who completed their short jail terms in other cases, were still languishing in jail due to the delayed trial of the explosives case.

‘My brother sepoy Darul Islam was in Peelkhana during the mutiny. He was arrested later. He was jailed for seven years on the charge of murder but acquitted of the charges of murder, arson, and other heinous crimes. It’s been 10 years, he was not released,’ Sabuj Miah told New Age over phone.

He said that they had been trying to draw the attention of the government and judiciary to how the former troopers were facing injustice.

The attorney general said that the government filed 20 appeals in December 2020.

Death-row convicts filed 35 appeals in January and February 2021 against their sentences, a court official said. The attorney general said all appeals would be heard together.

Both the government inquiry committee, headed by former secretary Anis-uz-Zaman Khan, and an investigation conducted by the army failed to identify the plot and the plotters.

The report by Anis-uz-Zaman recommended an investigation into the failure to gather intelligence about the planned mutiny. The army did not make the results of its investigation public.

New York-based rights group Human Rights Watch said that it had obtained the report and stated that the report faulted the government for not having taken a stronger line against BDR before the rebellion.

The successive Awami League government has so far initiated no further investigation recommended by the two probe bodies, while the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party has been saying that they will identify the perpetrators if voted to power.

HRW also urged the government to establish an independent investigative and prosecutorial task force with sufficient expertise, authority, and resources to rigorously investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute all allegations of unlawful deaths, torture, and mistreatment of suspects in the BDR mutiny, regardless of the perpetrator’s rank or institutional affiliation.

Families of slain officers and convicted soldiers said that the nation should know the reason for the rebellion, as well as the plot and plotters because neither an investigation nor a trial revealed them.

Slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman, repeatedly said that the pawns were tried but the plotters were not identified.

As of February 24, a total of 761 BDR jawans have been detained in Dhaka Central Jail, Kashimpur High Central Jail-1, Kashimpur Central Jail-2, and Kashimpur High Security Central Jail, according to the directorate of the prisons.

Senior military and civilian officials will pay tribute to the graves of killed soldiers at their military graveyard in the capital’s Banani today.​
 

BDR mutiny: ‘It was done to destroy army’s morale’​

Says Fakhrul; probe, trial centring incident not transparent, says GM Quader

1708821448334.png

Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir. File photo

BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir yesterday said the BDR mutiny was part of a long-term conspiracy that aimed to destroy the morale of the country's army.

On the same day, Jatiya Party Chairperson GM Quader said the trial and investigation process of Pilkhana carnage was not transparent; most families of the martyrs believe this as well.

The BNP and JP leaders made the remarks at the capital's Banani army graveyard, after placing floral wreaths at the grave of army officers who died during the BDR carnage.

The nation yesterday mourned the death of 74 people, including 57 army officers, in the incident that occurred on February 25-26 in 2009.

Talking to the media, Fakhrul said the BDR mutiny was a serious conspiracy that was against the country.

Claiming that around 7,000 jawans of then BDR (now Border Guard Bangladesh) are innocent, Fakhrul said, hearing of their cases is yet to be completed.

"They have been spending their lives in inhumane prison conditions for 13 to 14 years. Their families and future are being destroyed," he added.

"Today, I will demand to resolve all judicial issues against them. They should be released."

Asked about an Awami League leader mentioning that Khaleda Zia's movement on the day of the carnage was "suspicious", Fakhrul said such a statement is nothing but irresponsible.

Meanwhile, GM Quader said due to non-transparency in the investigation process, the martyrs' families are angry. "The government needs to pay attention to the trial of the brutal killings so that the families can be relieved."

"What action has been taken against those who were responsible for such horrific murders? The nation wants to know," he added.

After placing wreaths, the victims' families expressed disappointment that the verdict of the BDR carnage case is yet to be executed.

The mutiny in 2009 shocked the nation. A total of 829 people, mostly BDR members, were accused in the carnage case filed later.

On November 5, 2013, a Dhaka court sentenced 148 BDR members and two civilians to death, 160 to life in prison, and 256 people, mostly BDR soldiers, to rigorous imprisonment.

The court acquitted 278, but the prosecutors later appealed against the acquittal of 69.​
 
BDR Mutiny: Security implications for Bangladesh and the region
 

Attachments

  • BDR Mutiny Security implications for Bangladesh and the region.pdf
    251.5 KB · Views: 8

Carnage At Pilkhana BDR HQ: 15 years on, justice yet to be meted out​


1708821871993.png


Fifteen years have passed since the BDR mutiny that killed 74 people, including 57 army officials, but the victim families are yet to get final justice and the accused their due punishment, as both the cases filed over the incident have not yet been disposed of due to lengthy legal processes and courts being overburdened with cases.

The mutiny at the Pilkhana headquarters of the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) on February 25-26, 2009, left the nation shocked, as people stood aghast at the extent of the barbarity perpetrated at the headquarters of the paramilitary force, later renamed Border Guard Bangladesh.​

On November 5, 2013, a Dhaka court handed down death sentences to 150 BDR members and two civilians, and life imprisonment to 160 others for their role and involvement in the carnage. A total of 256 people, mostly BDR soldiers, were handed jail sentences.

The court acquitted 278 others, but the prosecution later appealed against the acquittal of 69.

In January 2015, the HC started hearing the appeals of the convicts and pronounced its verdict on November 27, 2017, confirming the death penalty of 139.

It commuted the death penalty of eight convicts to life imprisonment and acquitted five others, who were sentenced to death by the trial court.

The HC upheld life imprisonment of 146 and acquitted 14 of the 160 accused, who were sentenced to life by the lower court.

A total of 248 accused out of the 278 got acquittals from the HC.

The execution of the death row convicts now depends on the hearing of appeals by the Appellate Division and its verdict.
Contacted, Law Minister Anisul Huq told The Daily Star on February 14 that the appeals, which have been filed against the HC verdict in the BDR carnage case, will be heard and disposed of by the Appellate Division when they serially come up in the hearing list.

Those, who have filed the appeals, may take the initiative for early hearings before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, he said, adding, "The state has nothing to do in this regard."

About the case filed under the Explosive Substances Act in connection with the same incident, the minister said the trial proceedings are going on at the lower court and will be finished when the relevant procedures are done.

Meanwhile, Aminul Islam, one of the defence lawyers in the BDR carnage case, told this newspaper that it depends on the chief justice when the Appellate Division will start hearing the appeals.

He added that the deposition of the witnesses under the Explosive Substances Act has been going on before the magistrate court concerned.

A total of 68 appeals and leave-to-appeal petitions have been filed on behalf of the convicted accused.

Of them, 35 appeals were filed by 63 condemned convicts. The rest were filed on behalf of 162 convicts who were sentenced to life, he said, adding that the state also filed 20 appeals against the acquittals of 83 by the HC.

Aminul further said that around 500 accused, who have already served jail sentences and got acquitted by the trial court and HC, could not walk out of jail as they are also accused in the Explosives Substances Act case.

Over a year will be needed to finish the trial of the case filed under the Explosive Substances Act, he said, adding that family members of the arrested have been suffering and leading very miserable lives.

A total of 256 convicts in the carnage case are behind bars beyond their jail terms as the trial of the second case filed under the Explosive Substances Act is yet to be completed.

Public Prosecutor Mosharraf Hossain Kajol said the trial court has so far recorded depositions of 271 of a total of 644 witnesses in the second case, the trial of which was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The PP hoped it would be completed this year.​
 

Fakhrul questions investigation into 2009 BDR mutiny​

Fakhrul questions investigation into 2009 BDR mutiny


BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir on Saturday alleged that there was no proper investigation into the killings of 57 army officers in the BDR mutiny in 2009.

"We think the way this incident should have been investigated and the way the investigation process should have been conducted to bring out the real offenders and the masterminds through a fair investigation, that didn't happen unfortunately," he said.

Fakhrul came up with the remarks while talking to reporters after placing wreaths at a monument set up at Banani Army Graveyard in memory of the army officials killed in the Pilkhana carnage, marking the 14th anniversary of the incident.

He said the Army had conducted an investigation into the BDR mutiny incident, but the nation has not yet got the full report of that probe.

The BNP leader said some people were awarded death sentences and life imprisonment in a case filed in connection with the mutiny and subsequent killings.

But he lamented that the trial of another case filed under the Explosive Substances Act in connection with the same incident has not yet been completed, forcing many soldiers of the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) who claim themselves innocent still stay in jail.

"I was in prison a few days ago. I saw there that many ex-BDR members who were made accused in this case have been living inhumanly for 13/14 years. Their families and future are ruined," Fakhrul said.

He demanded the government take steps to complete the trial in the explosive case so that those who are innocent can return to normal life with their families.

On 25-26 February 2009, a mutiny in the then Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) left 74 people, including 57 army officers, murdered at the Pilkhana Headquarters.

On 5 November 2013, a Dhaka court awarded death sentences to 150 BDR members and two civilians, and life imprisonment to 160 others in the case. On 27 November 2017, the High Court confirmed the death penalty for 139 out of 152 accused.

Following the heinous killings of the army officers at the Pilkhana headquarters, the government renamed the mutiny-hit paramilitary force BDR as Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), changing its logo as well as uniform.

Fakhrul along with some ex-army officials went to the graveyard and placed wreaths at the monument and offered special prayers there seeking eternal peace of the departed souls of the slain army officers.

The BNP leader expressed deep homage to the slain army officers whom he described as the assets of the nation in protecting independence and sovereignty.

He also talked to Rakin Ahmed Bhuiya, son of then BDR Director General Maj Gen Shakil Ahmed who was killed in the mutiny along with her wife.​
 

AL, its govt involved in BDR carnage: Fakhrul​


AL, its govt involved in BDR carnage: Fakhrul


BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir on Sunday alleged that Awami League and its government were involved in the BDR mutiny at the Pilkhana Headquarters that left 57 army officers killed.

"The Awami League government gets unnerved whenever 25 February comes. One of their (govt's) ministers said yesterday (Saturday) whether our leaders Begum Khaleda Zia and Tarique Rahman were involved in that carnage," he said.

Speaking at a discussion, the BNP leader further said, "We would like to say very clearly that Awami League and its government were fully involved in this killing. With their direct cooperation and through their conspiracy and plan, this BDR carnage was carried out to turn Bangladesh into a weak subservient state and to completely demoralize the patriotic army of the country."

Fakhrul said the government's involvement can easily be understood as it talked to the rebel leaders and made a negotiation with them at the time of the mutiny. "What kind of negotiation it was? You compromised with those who were killing the smart officers of our army."

As per the rules of the Army, he said the mutiny must be suppressed through intervention, not by another means. "Moeen U Ahmed was the then Army Chief who played the main role in destroying democracy in Bangladesh through 1/11 (political changeover) and who tried to hamper the country's independence and destroy the army."

BNP arranged the discussion at Dhaka Reporters' Unity (DRU) in memory of 57 army officers killed in the BDR mutiny 14 years back.

On 25-26 February 2009, a cabal of the then Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) killed 74 people, including 57 army officers, of the paramilitary force at the Pilkhana Headquarters.

Following the heinous killings of the army officers at the Pilkhana headquarters, the government renamed the mutiny-hit paramilitary force BDR as Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), changing its logo as well as uniform.​
 

Army dropped plans to attack BDR HQ on Hasina's advice'​

PTI | ByHT Correspondent, Dhaka
Mar 01, 2009 02:57 PM IST

Bangladesh Army was ready to storm the headquarters of the BDR in Dhaka soon after the mutiny erupted, but heeded to Premier Sheikh Hasina's advice at the last minute to resolve the issue politically, a top officer has revealed. "The Prime Minister directed that the crisis be solved politically and it has been resolved in that manner," Brig. Gen. Mahmud Hossain, Director of Military Intelligence said.​


Bangladesh Army was ready to storm the headquarters of the BDR in Dhaka soon after the mutiny erupted, but heeded to Premier Sheikh Hasina's advice at the last minute to resolve the issue politically, a top officer has revealed.
"The Prime Minister directed that the crisis be solved politically and it has been resolved in that manner," Brig. Gen. Mahmud Hossain, Director of Military Intelligence, told a press conference in Dhaka last night.

He said the army was ready to put down the BDR mutiny soon after it began on Wednesday, but decided to support Hasina's decision to solve the issue politically.

The bloody two-day revolt by the renegade soldiers of the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles left at least 73 Army officers and four civilians dead.

Terming it "possibly the worst massacre of Army officers in Bangladesh's history", Brig Hossain said the anger among the armed forces was "very natural".

"However, the Army is a disciplined force which can control its emotion", he said.

Asked if a retaliation by the army would have led to more bloodshed, army doctor Col. Abdul Salam, who was also present at the press conference, said "it's a difficult question but the restraint by the Army was good."

Outraged over the killing of its officers during the mutiny by BDR soldiers, the Bangladesh Army demanded "maximum" punishment for those involved in the massacre.

"Exemplary punishment of the culprits will cool our resentment. Our demand is that the investigation into the killings should be quickened and maximum punishment should be given to those persons responsible for them," Brig. Hossain said.

He said the Army has begun its own probe into the killings of its officers during the mutiny even as the investigation ordered by a government-constituted committee continues.​
 
If Hasina wasn't the culprit then why on earth did she call Indian foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee? India was quick to blame Jamaat-e Islami for the BDR mutiny to hide its involvement in the mindless killings of 57 army officers. I firmly believe the BDR mutiny was the dirty work of India and Awami League. The truth shall come out one day and the justice will be done to punish India and Awami League for their crimes.


Hasina sought int'l help after mutiny​

She phoned Pranab, states US cable leaked by WikiLeaks

After the 2009 BDR mutiny, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had telephoned India's External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee requesting assistance from the international community, The Hindu reported citing a leaked US embassy cable.


Though Hasina had not been specific about the kind of help she needed, Pranab had offered “to be responsive” if needed and the Indian government had also rallied London, Beijing and Tokyo to support the cause, the article published yesterday said.


Nirupama Subramanian wrote that US Embassy Charge d'Affaires Steven White was surprised when he was called in for a meeting with Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon on the last weekend of February 2009.

That “unusual Saturday meeting” was to discuss the mutiny by troopers of the Bangladesh Rifles a couple of days earlier, and the worry in the Indian government about its implications for the newly elected government of Hasina, perceived as being a friend of India, the report said.

The cable that was sent on March 2, 2009 (194661: confidential), and accessed by The Hindu through WikiLeaks, details the conversation between the American stand-in envoy and Menon.

India feared that the Jamaat-e-Islami would exploit the instability resulting from the rebellion to “fish in troubled waters.”

The foreign secretary described the mutiny as long in the planning. Menon did not blame the Jamaat directly for it, but said the party was disappointed by the results of the December 2008 election, and the steps taken by the new government to counter extremism.

Secondly, it appears India was worried that the mutiny could affect the civilian government's relations with the military.

Menon expressed concern about the likely effect of the violence on the army, which had lost several officers while quelling the mutiny. The foreign secretary indicated this might lead to trouble for the Hasina government with the army.

He noted that the mutineers had thrown the bodies of military officials into sewers. But he was encouraged that the army chief was working closely with the government to stabilise the situation.

“Menon appreciated the US statement on the violence and stressed the importance of close coordination and consultation between the US and India as the situation developed. He warned that while the initial violence was over, it would take several days before it was clear what would happen next and that further trouble was possible,” the US official cabled.

A month later, India continued to be worried about the after-effects of the mutiny. On March 26, 2009, the US embassy in Delhi cabled (198952: confidential) that India's main concern was to stabilise Prime Minister Hasina's government, the article wrote.

The ministry of external affairs deputy secretary told embassy officials that India was concerned about the possible involvement of “radical forces.”

He related that many of the known culprits in the massacre were recruited under the previous BNP government and have Jamaat-e-Islami links.

The Indian foreign secretary shared with US Ambassador Peter Burleigh his assessment that the situation in Bangladesh was “fragile” following the mutiny, Nirupama wrote.

According to a cable sent on April 16, 2009 from New Delhi (202615: confidential) reporting the meeting, Menon expressed the Indian government's worry that the current environment would allow extremist groups in Bangladesh to destabilise the democratic government and provide them with a “freer hand” to launch attacks in India.

“Pressed by the ambassador to identify which groups India was concerned about, Mr. Menon said that India's worries extended from political parties like the Jamaat-e-Islami to extremist groups like the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, Bangadesh (HUJI, B),” the embassy cabled.

The Indian official told the US ambassador that even though petty issues often consumed politics in Bangladesh, he was surprised that despite the instability created by the mutiny, “politicians were focused on matters such as Opposition Leader Begum Zia's housing.”

“India was concerned about a sense of drift in the government and [Menon] judged that the government was not functioning in a normal fashion,” the cable said.​
 

Pilkhana carnage: BNP raises questions over lengthy judicial procedure​


1708903605267.png


BNP today expressed concern over the prolonged legal proceedings in the Pilkhana mutiny case.

A BNP delegation led by its standing comittee member Abdul Moyeen Khan paid homage to those killed in the mutiny at the Banani Military graveyard in the morning.

"We have heard about the judgment in the Pilkhana carnage case, but what is the status of the judgment? Has there been any appeal, and why has the hearing not completed in 15 years? Furthermore, another explosive case was filed in 2011... Why is the trial of the case still lingering?" he said.

"Today, we will say only one thing, every citizen of Bangladesh should get justice... That's what we expect. "

On February 25, 2009, several hundred Bangladesh Rifles (now BGB) men staged an armed revolt at the Darbar Hall of the force's Pilkhana headquarters during the three-day "BDR Week".

A total of 74 people, including 57 Army officers, were killed in the massacre beginning on this day.

The mutiny finally ended the following day (Feb 26) with the surrender of firearms, ammunition, and grenades through a negotiation between the then government and the BDR rebels.
 
In my opinion, the Indian army moved its para commando brigade from Agra to West Bengal to give a strong signal to Bangladesh army that if Sheikh Hasina was harmed due to BDR revolt, the Indian army will launch an attack on Bangladesh to save Sheikh Hasina. I think this is clear enough that both India and Awami League were the masterminds of BDR revolt.


Bangladesh mutiny: India moves more troops to WB

New Delhi: India has air lifted "elements" of its para brigade based in Agra to Kalaikunda in West Bengal to deal with any contingency which arises due to the internal turmoil in Bangladesh.

Sources said, over a battalion strength (over 1000 soldiers) of the 50m independent Parachute Brigade was moved on Sunday from Agra to Kalaikunda, which has a large IAF base.

"Depending on the situation, more could follow. With Bangladesh army progressively taking over from the paramilitary BDR in posts along the Indo-Bangladesh border, it's a precautionary move," said a source.

With India keen on securing Bangladesh's firm cooperation in rooting out anti-Indian terror and insurgent outfits operating from its soil, the armies from the two countries recently came together to hold their first ever counter terrorism exercise in February-March.

Over the last couple of years, New Delhi has actively worked towards bolstering ties with Dhaka- which included forging links with Bangladesh army chief General Moeen U Ahmed, who took over the country's reins in early in 2007 with one of the main objectives being the need for both countries to "resolutely" tackle terrorism together.

New Delhi wants Dhaka tom act decisively against the over 100 suspected terror training camps and hide-outs of North-East insurgent outfits within its borders, apart from a hard crackdown on Harkat-Ul-Jihad-Islami (HuJI), which has left its imprints in several terror attacks in India.

 
The IAF was put on stand by mode to rescue Hasina and her cohorts who were involved in BDR mutiny. First they moved para commando brigade from Agra to West Bengal and then put IAF on stand by mode. These events clearly show the Indian involvement in BDR mutiny.


IAF on stand-by, ready to help Bangladesh​

Hindustan Times | ByRahul Singh, New Delhi
Mar 02, 2009 01:20 AM IST

With Bangladesh caught in a bloody turmoil after the two-day mutiny by a disgruntled border security force last week, the Indian Air Force has been put on standby to render assistance to the neighbouring country, if required, reports Rahul Singh.​

With Bangladesh caught in a bloody turmoil after the two-day mutiny by a disgruntled border security force last week, the Indian Air Force (IAF) has been put on standby to render assistance to the neighbouring country, if required.

The IAF’s transport bases, equipped with IL-76 heavy-lift and AN-32 medium-lift aircraft, have been asked to stay prepared for any commitment to Bangladesh whose fragile civilian government is coming to terms with the rebellion by the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles (BDR).

A senior IAF official, who refused to be identified, told HT on Sunday the force was ready to provide logistics as well as humanitarian help.

“We follow some drills whenever there is any instability or calamity in neighbourhood. Bangladesh returned to democratic rule barely two months ago,” a source in the air headquarters said.

The IAF had flown relief supplies to Bangladesh in November 2007, under Operation Sahayta, after a devastating cyclone tore through the country’s western coast leaving thousands dead and millions homeless.

In a stand-by scenario, the air force prioritises its commitments to make sure that assets are available at any given time for speedy deployment. The focus was on conserving assets to deal with any eventuality, said another official. It could also entail curbing leave temporarily to ensure availability of air crews.

The IAF’s transport base at Jorhat in Assam is the closest to Bangladesh. It is also one of the biggest transport bases of the force.

The mutinous guards went on a shooting spree at BDR’s officer corps at an annual meeting where troops were supposed to discuss grievances with the seniors. The rebels wanted among other things better pay, change in the command and control structure and permission to be part of lucrative UN peacekeeping missions.​
 
Last edited:
What you have witnessed and those that appeared in various media during the few days around 25 February 2009 are only "reactionary activities" to some 'still unknown' actions. To find those " unknown actions," you must return about six months before 25 February 2009. I am specifically talking about the last half of 2008. A few things happened in those six months that triggered this tragedy at Pilkhana.
Look for significant activities and developments within the Bangladesh Army in the last half of 2008. If you don't know about those last six months, try to find out as much as possible.
Bangladeshi media was under the Emergency rule in those last six months, and BD government intelligence services heavily censored them. I haven't seen any Bangladeshi/foreign big talker talking about those six months because General Moeen/Fakhruddin's hybrid emergency government ultimately kept them in the darkness during that period. You will be amazed if you fully understand and follow my suggestion.
 
Let me share an article I wrote in 2009 right after the BDR mutiny. My article was published in some online media.

BDR Revolt: A Deadly Strategic Game Plan
By Saif
Introduction

Since the independence, Bangladesh Rifles, the first line of defense, have been combating smuggling, human trafficking, drug trafficking and other illegal activities along the border and have made supreme sacrifices to protect the lives and properties of the people from enemy invasion with great courage and valor. Bangladesh Rifles have earned worldwide recognition for its determination, patriotism, and professionalism when they successfully repelled a large invasion by Indian border security force at Roumari point in 2001.

Despite its performance and patriotism, the members of Bangladesh Rifles got little attention from successive governments to alleviate the problem of poor pay and benefit structures allowed for them. Nevertheless, they continued to discharge their duties with utmost sincerity and took part in all nation building activities maintaining professionalism and discipline.

On 25th Feb, 2009, the nation was shocked at the news that some BDR members had revolted and killed many officers, who were on deputation from Bangladesh army, to protest against poor pay and benefit structures, and alleged corruption by the late Director General.

The mutineers asked the government to implement a set of demands on a priority basis to address the problems of the members of Bangladesh Rifles. Some of these demands[1] are as follows:



  1. withdrawing army officers from all command posts of BDR and recruiting new officers from BCS cadres
  2. allowing full rationing for BDR members
  3. sending BDR personnel to U.N. peacekeeping missions
  4. revamping salary structures and promotion procedures
  5. allowing defense allowances for BDR members
  6. procuring more transportation vehicles to guard the long porous border with India and Myanmar
  7. increasing the quality of food and
  8. improving educational and medical facilities for family members of the soldiers

Because of defense strategy, BDR is considered 2nd line of defense and embedded in the army, so it will not be possible to withdraw army officers from the command posts of BDR, but the rest of the demands deserve due consideration because these are logical and should have been given to the BDR members a long time ago for they put their lives in danger to safeguard the frontiers of the country.

It is, therefore, hoped that the government will take appropriate measures to remove the grievances of the BDR members to stop the occurrences of similar incidents in the future.

Now, let us examine whether there were any political motivations behind this unfortunate incident that shocked the entire nation.
 
The Revolt: Actors Involved, Motivations and Methods Employed

The relationship between Awami League and the defense forces of the country has never been cordial because of former's security outlook that anticipates no security threat from India and considers defense expenditures needless. The clauses of the '25 year friendship treaty' that virtually eliminated Bangladesh's sovereign right to seek assistance from other friendly nations to expand and modernize its armed forces, the step motherly attitude of the government, and the formation of Rakkhi Bahini had created widespread resentment among the army officers during the first tenure of Awami League. Instead of taking corrective measures to remove the legitimate grievances of the army officers, the then government continued with their suppressive and discriminatory policies to neglect, humiliate and alienate the armed forces, which ultimately led to the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman along with most of his family members at the hands of a few young army officers. Awami League has never forgotten the incident nor forgiven the armed forces for the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and has left no stone unturned to avenge the incident in 1975 by creating divisions in the armed forces through various political machinations.

The comments of the LGRD minister after the BDR mutiny is a testament to the fact that his party still holds grudges against the army for the death of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and other four prominent leaders of Awami League in 1975 at the hands of a section of army officers. He said, "If the trial of Bangabandhu and four national leaders killing cases were held in time and the offender were brought into justice, the Pilkhana tragedy was not take place".[2] Didn't the minister try to justify the killings of the army officers at the BDR headquarters because the killers of Bangabandhu had not been brought to justice after 1975?

After the political change in 1/11, the military backed government had thrown many Awami League leaders into jail for their alleged involvement in financial scandals and abuse of power, which many believe, has caused further deterioration in the relationship between Awami League and the armed forces. After the elections, Awami League's virulent verbal attack on the army for its role in 1/11 is a testament to the fact that they wanted to weaken the army so that the military could never repeat a 1/11 like situation to bring about political changes in the country.

India has its own agenda to diminish our defense capability because it needs a subservient military in Bangladesh to achieve its strategic objectives of establishing total domination on Indo-Bangla border, and using our defense and intelligence resources to quell protracted insurgencies in its North East region. India's abortive misadventure inside Bangladesh territory in 2001 forced them to reorganize their security policy vis a vis Bangladesh to emphasize the need for searching new avenues to play larger role in the matters related to defense of Bangladesh and to diminish Chinese influence in the country. But this could only be accomplished through active cooperation from a friendly government in Bangladesh to create tension within our defense forces to break their morale and to make it imperative for Bangladesh to seek Indian help in reorganizing the defense system.


So, the BDR mutiny may be the case of a teamwork between a foreign external intelligence agency and some political elements within the country to set the stage for departure of the army officers from Bangladesh Rifles to weaken it and to tarnish the image of the army before the whole nation to break their morale.

The assertion that some local political elements and India are working together to weaken the security systems of Bangladesh may be true because the government's quick decision to grant general amnesty to all rebellious members of Bangladesh Rifles without assessing the ground reality and to not allow any military action to quell the rebellion, which gave the mutineers enough time to put forth a set of demands and to flee in groups from the BDR headquarters seem to be a preplanned strategy to instigate a rebellion, to break the chain of command of BDR, to kill a large number of officers, and to ensure a safe exit for the mutineers.

If the local and foreign conspirators who planned, directed, and implemented the rebellion are not identified and the rebellious members of BDR who broke the chain command are not brought to justice such occurrences of rebellion may be repeated in other security forces to destabilize the entire nation and to create a situation for external powers to intervene in the name of peacekeeping.
 
Findings of The Army Report

The army formed its own 20 member probe committee on 2nd March, led by Lt. General Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, to investigate into the gruesome murder of army officers by the rebels at BDR headquarters on 25th Feb, 2009, and this probe committee acted separately from the committee formed by the government to investigate into the same matter. After investigating for more than two months, the committee has made the summary of their report public for the sake of transparency of the investigation. The army report published in various newspapers has identified the following reasons for the BDR mutiny:

  1. Wrong impression about the facilities of the army
  2. Lack of transparency in establishing and running BDR shops
  3. Delays in payment of duty allowances for the 2008 national elections
  4. Misunderstanding about lease and contracts of different works in the BDR headquarters
  5. Wrong impression about the BDR's director general Shakil Ahmed and his wife Nazneen Shakil, and Dhaka sector commander Mujibul Haque's alleged involvement in irregularities
  6. Delays made by the Home and Finance ministries in resolving the BDR problems

The army report on BDR mutiny did not find any convincing evidence of any direct or indirect militant links simply because of the fact that the extremists did not have as elaborate network and manpower as needed to plan and execute a mission deep inside the military establishment of Bangladesh with a pinpoint accuracy to kill almost 15% officers of the Bangladesh army within the space of 24 hours as the previous democratically elected government had already dismantled the countrywide terror network of JMB, the most powerful extremist group in the country and executed its top masterminds as part of its continuous effort to fight against terrorism for which Bangladesh has partnered with the international community and has received accolades from across the world.

Criticisms of The Army Report

In investigating such a complex and dangerous incident that paralyzed the entire defense system of the country, the investigators should have had proper authority to contact, interrogate, and collect information from people who had direct or indirect contacts with the rebels before and after the mutiny to explore local and external linkages. They also should have followed a similar structured method described below to accomplish the investigation process:

  1. Identifying and defining the scope of the problem
  2. Setting and determining the scope of the investigation objectives
  3. Assembling adequate manpower with expertise and experience to form a committee
  4. Identifying target population for interrogation/questioning
  5. Verifying and confirming collected information for accuracy
  6. Submitting the findings and recommendations to the government

But the military investigators had to narrow down their scope of investigation to exclude exploring the possibility of political and external connections because of lack of proper government authorizations to contact and interrogate certain people. Many believe, the restrictions on the investigators may have been imposed to protect the local and external conspirators who had teamed up to cause the mutiny and kill scores of army officers.

Even though the army report did not find any convincing links of politicians and external powers to this sad episode that shook the entire defense system of the country, the involvement of some elements within the government, and of some foreign intelligence agencies should not be ruled out because, as per the report, the committee could not work freely since the government imposed restrictions on investigators to limit their power to collect necessary evidence, to verify obtained information, and to confirm information sources to identify, investigate, establish and confirm the involvement of political and foreign elements in the mindless killing of the officers at the BDR headquarters.

The events in the BDR headquarters were meticulously planned by some powerful quarters to use the BDR against the army to kill as many officers as possible to leave no able hands to lead this force in order to achieve the goals of destroying the border defense system of the country, of avenging the incident in Roumari in 2001, of proving BDR as an undisciplined force to create a situation to make it imperative to reorganize it with the help of a certain neighbor and of creating a permanent mistrust and suspicion between the two forces entrusted with the responsibilities of protecting national security.

The political connections to the incident are visible from a series of events, including, a section of politicians and media launched a vituperative attack on the army for its role in the events on and after 1/11 to instigate anti army sentiment across the country; the government did not order 350 RAB personnel, who reached the gate of BDR headquarters at 10:10 am, for an action against the mutineers, who were yet to be organized and set up heavy arms at the gates of the headquarters; the government ordered the 46th brigade of Bangladesh army, who reached the gates of the BDR headquarters at 10:50 am, to go out of sight from the headquarters, which gave the rebels enough time to organize themselves to kill and torture more people in the BDR complex; the mutineers were given a chance to contact the media to propagate unfounded accusations against the Bangladesh army; and an advanced list was already prepared to torture and kill the wives of the army officers.

Even though the army report attributed the failure of Juba League's president Jahangir Kabir Nanak and general secretary Mirza Azam in the negotiation with the rebels to surrender arms and to release the hostages to lack of professionalism, the thing that is still bugging a lot of people is the reason why the prime minister chose these two fellows who had no prior experience in crisis management and had a criminal record of killing 11 Innocent civilians by setting fire to a double decker bus near Sheraton hotel in 2004. Let me quote the passage from the report published in a newspaper where one of the top Awami League leaders, Mr. Sheikh Selim, disclosed the cold blooded murder of innocent civilians by Nanak and Azam:

“He also disclosed that AL's front organisation Juba League's president Jahangir Kabir Nanak and general secretary Mirza Azam were involved in killing 11 people by setting fire to a double-decker BRTC bus near Dhaka Sheraton Hotel in 2004.

Both Nanak and Azam held a meeting at Juba League office in the evening on that day and made a plan to commit the arson. "I protested the incident to our party chief and told her the politics cannot be done in such a way," the investigators said quoted Selim as saying.”

Although the investigators were able to confirm the involvement of Torab Ali, a local Awami League leader, in the mutiny, they, however, were unable to establish a link between him and his partners within the political circle due to absence of government authorizations to contact and question top ruling party leaders. This, many believe, may have been done to conceal the political connections to the mutiny, and to the subsequent murder of scores of brilliant army officers.

It is astounding that the military investigators did not even try to obtain government authorizations to explore external connections to the mutiny because such an impeccable operation to carryout large scale killings of army officers was not the work of a bunch of youngsters, but rather the work of a professional organization who had inside information to plan and execute such a flawless military mission at the heart of the nation's defense establishment to take out all the intended targets and to ensure safe exit for all those who took part in it.

There is a growing fear of Indian involvement in the BDR revolt and the mass killing of the army officers at the BDR headquarters because of the comments of Mr. Pranab Mukherjee who said, "I had to go out of my way to issue a stern warning to those trying to destabilise the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh that if they continued with their attempts, then India would not sit idle.", which is another way of saying that India would have approved a direct military intervention if developments in Bangladesh had gone against their strategic interest.

The same report also said, “New Delhi had conveyed it was willing to take counter-measures in Dhaka, direct intervention included.”[6] Now the question is why did the Indian minister issue such a warning to Bangladesh? Did he not believe the people and the security forces of Bangladesh are capable enough to protect their own prime minister? Or did he want to conceal India's own involvement in the mutiny through intimidation? Whatever the case may be, India's over enthusiasm in our internal affairs has raised some serious suspicions about its intentions with regards to our national security.

The order to put Indian air force on a stand by mode and to deploy para commandos from Agra to West Bengal[8] to deal with any emergency situation in

Bangladesh can also be construed as Indian attempt to interfere in our internal affairs using the tension created after the mutiny, and if we combine this with the comments of Mr. Pranab Mukharjee then a strategic scenario emerges where Bangladesh is being destabilized with the intent to force herself into a long term bilateral security arrangements with India to pave the way for greater Indian role in the matters of Bangladesh's security and defense. And the proof of it can be found in a report in The Telegraph, a Calcutta based newspaper, where India offered to send a peace mission to give security to the Calcutta-Dhaka-Calcutta Moitree express and termed it as the first international bilateral peace mission by India after its peace mission in Sri-Lanka[9]. The views expressed in another report from the same newspaper that said “Details of the talks were not immediately available but the US has been keen that India plays a stabilising role in the South Asian region. It is in this context that the Indian effort to send a peace mission, not only for the security of the train service between Dhaka and Calcutta, but also in a larger context, preferably on an appeal from Dhaka, will be internationally acceptable to Washington.”[10] are detrimental to our national security because it proves, in light of recently concluded Indo-U.S. Strategic agreement, there is ample international support for India to play larger role in South Asia, in general, and Bangladesh, in particular. This is what many have been saying for a while that the bilateral task force, military exercise between Bangladesh and Indian armed forces, and the revolt by the BDR members are all part of a grand design to make the security forces of Bangladesh subservient to the strategic and political interests of India and Awami League.

External linkages to the BDR revolt can also be found by the seizure of various fire arms, equipment and other military gadgets at the BDR headquarters that are not used by any security agencies in the country.[11] Experts believe such sophisticated military gadgets were supplied by external sources to perform the killings of the army officers in the BDR headquarters complex.
 
Concluding Observations

With the growing suspicion of involvement of some elements within the government in the well orchestrated revolt at BDR headquarters firstly, to rid BDR of army officers for the purpose of weakening our border security and secondly, to kill the brightest army officers with an ultimate plan to destroy our defense system, the government is feeling the heat from both the army and the people of the country. Sensing the impending danger of being exposed, a certain quarter has revived the old arms smuggling case and is frantically trying to associate the opposition parties, the intelligence agencies, and even Pakistan and its external spy agency, ISI, with ULFA to convince the public of the existence of a nexus between the nationalist forces, the defense establishment of the country, Pakistan and the United Liberation Front of Assam with the sole purpose of falsely accusing them of sponsoring terrorism and masterminding the carnage at the BDR headquarters.

In order to make their case more convincing and deal a heavy blow to our national defense, they even drew China, the largest arms supplier and trusted defense partner of Bangladesh, into this complex scenario. Gruesome murder of the army officers, prompt announcement of general amnesty by the prime minister without properly understanding the ground reality, unabated media propaganda to humiliate the army, reluctance of the government to order for a military action against the rebels, decision to send Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam, who have criminal records of killing 11 innocent civilians, as negotiators, stern warning of military intervention against Bangladesh from Indian minister Pranab Mukherjee, and the subsequent deployment of Indian troops along the border suggest the involvement of powerful local and external elements in the BDR revolt to accomplish a diabolical plan to inflict enormous damage upon the defense system of Bangladesh.

The army investigators should have done an exhaustive investigation into the possibility of involvement of political and foreign elements in the BDR revolt to expose the real conspirators for the sake of our national security, but unfortunately the army top brass did not pursue for the mandate to explore political and foreign connections because of the reluctance of the government, and also the Indian threat of military intervention might have forced them to confine their investigation to only a small area just to identify the BDR jawans who were involved in the killings of the officers and to bring charges against them. Lastly, the defense forces of the country should know that similar attempts to incite rebellions in other security forces will be attempted in future if the real culprits are not exposed and punished with iron fist.
 
Due to limited information sources, you still have failed to find the chronicles of the last eight months before Pilkhna. Did you know that the Late General Shakil was more senior to General Mubeen, who would become the next CAS after Moeen's retirement? Already In September 2008, it was clear that slain General Shakil Ahmed would be superseded and General Mubeen would become the next CAS. Then, there were other significant incidents that you probably don't know. All you are doing is to get busy with the day after but not the day before. I gave you only one minor clue, far from the whole.
You must start afresh to unearth Pilkhana 2009 and forget everything you have known. If you don't, each year, you will still keep digesting the same old recycled story repeatedly and wondering why it happened.
 
Last edited:
Lt. Gen (rtd) Moinul Islam termed the BDR mutiny as preplanned and indirectly blamed Awami League and India for the mindless killings of the army officers.


 
Last edited:
Mr. Hasan Mahmud is talking rubbish to hide Awami League's involvement in the BDR carnage. Blaming BNP for the incident is not going to work. The circumstantial evidences clearly show Awami League and India's involvement in the tragic event. An impartial investigation into the matter will definitely reveal Awami League and India's role in the BDR mutiny which took place in 2009.

BNP was involved in BDR carnage: Foreign Minister​

FE ONLINE DESK
Published :​
Feb 26, 2024 18:18
Updated :​
Feb 27, 2024 00:47


1708992058787.png


Foreign Minister Dr Hasan Mahmud on Monday alleged that BNP was directly involved in the BDR carnage, which took place on February 25 in 2008.

“The Awami League came to power in 2008 after a landslide victory in the elections in January that year. It is a common sense that no government wants to be involved in any incident that could destabilise it,” he argued.

“The BNP leaders, like [Ruhul Kabir] Rizvi Ahmed, are talking insane out of frustration, as after the 2024 elections they have no existence. They exist only in the television channels,” the foreign minister said when asked to comment on Rizvi’s remark that the AL was responsible for the BDR killing.

Talking to reporters at his residence in Dhaka city, Hasan Mahmud pointed out that those killed in the carnage were members of families linked to the Awami League.

In this connection, he added that before the carnage, BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia left her cantonment residence early in the morning, which was very unusual because she was not an early riser.

“It means that she knew about the incident beforehand. So all of these prove that it was the BNP that was directly involved in the carnage in order to destabilise the government.

Responding to a question, the foreign minister said that he had a detailed discussion with the visiting US team on Sunday where issues related to taking bilateral ties to a new height were focused.

“I have told them that President Biden’s letter to our Prime Minister contributed a lot to further solidifying the bilateral ties.”

Asked whether the US team took a one-sided view as they had meetings with pro-BNP civil society members, he said that it was up to them.

“However, maybe those persons requested an audience with the US team. I hope in future they will meet with people of all quarters,” he added.
 
Due to limited information sources, you still have failed to find the chronicles of the last eight months before Pilkhna. Did you know that the Late General Shakil was more senior to General Mubeen, who would become the next CAS after Moeen's retirement? Already In September 2008, it was clear that slain General Shakil Ahmed would be superseded and General Mubeen would become the next CAS. Then, there were other significant incidents that you probably don't know. All you are doing is to get busy with the day after but not the day before. I gave you only one minor clue, far from the whole.
You must start afresh to unearth Pilkhana 2009 and forget everything you have known. If you don't, each year, you will still keep digesting the same old recycled story repeatedly and wondering why it happened.
I wrote the article based on the information available in the media at that time. There is no way for me to get inside information as I am not in the military. General Moeen tried to be the president of Bangladesh but could not get U.S.A's approval. So, he did his best to get Awami League in the power because that was the only way he could save his skin from BNP. It is my firm belief that India masterminded the BDR revolt to kill army officers to avenge its defeat in Roumari. Awami League extended its helping hand to India to avenge Mujib's death at the hand of the army.
 
It is my firm belief that India masterminded the BDR revolt to kill army officers to avenge its defeat in Roumari. Awami League extended its helping hand to India to avenge Mujib's death at the hand of the army.
That is a manufactured disinformation spread by people who were the real masterminds. Those who were killed were primarily pro-Indian officers, including General Shakil. I was present on one occasion where General Shakil presented his thesis of giving India all the transit they needed. He presented it in writing, and I have a copy. It is okay if you are not from the military, as most of them are not smart anyway. However, you need a critical mind and solid information to think independently.
 
However, you need a critical mind and solid information to think independently.
Solid information on BDR revolt cannot be found on the Internet. Researchers need access to inside information which I don't have. I also know that General Shakil was pro-India. Sheikh Hasina propagated the lies that all the murdered officers were pro-India. She did that to put the blame on BNP.
 
I also know that General Shakil was pro-India.
How do you know that ? Did you talk to him personally, or did someone tell you? If you can not come out from the BNP/BAL binary and give India credit for everything that you can not solve, you will never understand the dynamics of Bangladesh.
There are more powerful forces in Bangladesh than BNP/BAL. You have to know who they are, and they are not "do takke ka" officers as you may presume. You saw how "do takke ka" officers died in Pilkhna. It is the same In Pakistan.
I am telling you this because you have joined this defense forum to discuss things more critically than people in the tea stalls do based on hearsay. You will learn only when you acknowledge what you are missing.
 
How do you know that ? Did you talk to him personally, or did someone tell you?
I also read his article where he had advocated for giving transit facilities to India. No army officers with anti India bias would advocate for giving transit facilities to India because they knew India would use this transit facilities for military purpose. I don't discuss things based on hearsay. Please don't insult me. I rely on media and books/magazines for information. Researchers who don't have access to inside information use media and books/magazines to collect information. I am telling you the BDR revolt was masterminded by India. Thank you.
 
I also read his article where he had advocated for giving transit facilities to India. No army officers with anti India bias would advocate for giving transit facilities to India because they knew India would use this transit facilities for military purpose. I don't discuss things based on hearsay. Please don't insult me. I rely on media and books/magazines for information. Researchers who don't have access to inside information use media and books/magazines to collect information. I am telling you the BDR revolt was masterminded by India. Thank you.
Don’t take it personally. It is not facebook and nothing to feel insulted. Researchers don’t come to conclusions based on propaganda materials either. I already mentioned if read in my earlier posts that the so called BDR revolt was a reaction only. But what was the original action which prompted Indian government to get involved? What actually happened ? There was something serious going on and it has nothing to with revenge of previous hostilities . Your BD media is fully silent on it because they are not allowed to tell it you guys are also satisfied with India theory while closing the case. And BNP is no less pro-Indian than BAL. We know their founder Zia killed unarmed Pak officers while they were sleeping in 1971 including his commanding officer.
 

AL govt behind BDR mutiny: Rizvi​


1709079194095.png


Responding to Foreign Minister Hasan Mahmud's comment that BNP was involved in the BDR mutiny, BNP Senior Joint Secretary General Ruhul Kabir Rizvi yesterday said the incident occurred under the patronage of the Awami League government.

He made the remarks at a press conference at the party's Nayapaltan central office.​

"The absence of the army operation in Pilkhana, the hospitality offered to the killers, the announcement of general amnesty, and allowing many to flee abroad raised many questions. Many people lost their jobs for raising those questions," he said.

"Secret information leaked by WikiLeaks published on August 30, 2011, testimonies of those involved in the incident, their trial process, partial report of the investigation committee, investigative reports of local and foreign newspapers and media, clearly prove that 57 army officers and many of their family members were brutally killed in the name of BDR mutiny in cold blood under the patronage of the Awami League government. And behind them were this government's foreign lords," he alleged.


Hasan Mahmud on Monday said it is clear as daylight that BNP was behind the BDR mutiny and killed the country's smart officers.​
 
And BNP is no less pro-Indian than BAL. We know their founder Zia killed unarmed Pak officers while they were sleeping in 1971 including his commanding officer.
Ask any Indian politicians, they will tell you that BNP is the only political party that spread anti India sentiment throughout Bangladesh. As for zia killing Lt. Colonel Janjua, do you even know how many Bengali army officers were killed by the Pakistani army?

You are going offtopic by discussing the events of Bangladesh's liberation war. I think you should stop bringing 1971 war in a thread opened to discuss BDR revolt. Thank you.
 
Ask any Indian politicians, they will tell you that BNP is the only political party that spread anti India sentiment throughout Bangladesh. As for zia killing Lt. Colonel Janjua, do you even know how many Bengali army officers were killed by the Pakistani army?

You are going offtopic by discussing the events of Bangladesh's liberation war. I think you should stop bringing 1971 war in a thread opened to discuss BDR revolt. Thank you.
BD army themselves killed their own rogue officers in Pilkhna 2009, but their intelligence set up a propaganda to divert people's attention to India ( most convenient) and elsewhere.
Nothing is off-topic when you discuss about India/Pakistan/Bangladesh military. Your BD army has a long track record of killing their officers, which was started by BNP founder Ziaur Rehman in 1971 ( most likely also by RAW?). You do not have the honesty to blame your own Army, and then you blame India, Pakistan, and everyone else. Unlike your Facebook page, everything you post here in this forum must go through public scrutiny. Accept it.
 
BD army themselves killed their own rogue officers in Pilkhna 2009, but their intelligence set up a propaganda to divert people's attention to India ( most convenient) and elsewhere.
Nothing is off-topic when you discuss about India/Pakistan/Bangladesh military. Your BD army has a long track record of killing their officers, which was started by BNP founder Ziaur Rehman in 1971 ( most likely also by RAW?). You do not have the honesty to blame your own Army, and then you blame India, Pakistan, and everyone else. Unlike your Facebook page, everything you post here in this forum must go through public scrutiny. Accept it.
Your claim that Bangladesh army killed their own officers in 2009 is bulls*hit. My thread has nothing to do with Bangladesh army. It has everything to do with Bangladesh Rifles (border security force). So you gone offtopic when you brought up president zia and our liberation war in the discussion. In 1971 there was no Bangladesh army. It was Pakistan army who started the killing of Bengali army and police officers in 25th March 1971. Do you have the honesty to blame your own Pakistan army for the killing and raping in East Pakistan? Don't teach me about public scrutiny of my post. I have been posting on the internet for 30 years. So, please go give your advice to someone else.
 
Last edited:
Don't teach me about public scrutiny of my post. I have been posting on the internet for 30 years. So, please go give your advice to someone else.
Even if you have used the internet for 1000 years, you still have to follow the fundamentals of reasoning and logic. It appears you are unwilling to accept anything other than your discourse - one-sided propaganda. You are not getting it as it seems. I am not advising you. Next time, you will see sanctions. It is a warning.
 
Could you please direct me to forum rules that I have broken which forced you to issue me a warning?
You said: So, please go give your advice to someone else.
Forum rules are guidelines only and not set in stone. It is my work to give you feedback, and you want me to relieve myself of my work. Imagine, there will be anarchy and chaos in this forum if every member starts acting with this attitude. That alone warrants a red flag and warning. If you have used the internet for 30 years, as you said, that is great! Now, you are in this forum which welcomes all sorts of opinions. It is not your task to set up rules for what one can or can not post. Try to learn by asking more questions, and do not shut down people by calling something "off-topic". Everything is interrelated in this world. No one is an island. If you do not like it and you want to go the route of "complaining against complaining", you are free to do so. You keep posting, and we will be giving our feedback. Other posters will also share their views.

We do not want this Bengali section to become an "Exclusion Zone," which you want. It is still a section of the greater Pkdefense forum, and this forum should not be used as a political propaganda tool against any particular country or government. Our ultimate goal is to serve Pakistan by discussing contemporary military and strategic issues that benefit Pakistan, as the name implies.
 
The daily Manab Jamin has published an interview of ex DG of BDR Lt. Gen. Moinul Islam where he categorically blamed Awami League and India for the BDR Revolt and the subsequent killings of 57 army officers. The interview is in Bengali.


সেদিন পিলখানায় কী ঘটেছিল ডিজি মইনুলের বয়ানে​

অনলাইন ডেস্ক​

২৬ ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২৪, সোমবার
mzamin

facebook sharing button

twitter sharing button

পিলখানায় সেনা কর্মকর্তাদের পরিকল্পিতভাবে হত্যা করা হয়েছিল বলে মনে করেন লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল (অব.) মো. মইনুল ইসলাম। বাংলা আউটলুক নামে একটি অনলাইনকে দেয়া সাক্ষাৎকারে তিনি বলেছেন, পিলখানার পরিস্থিতি বিশেষ করে অস্ত্রাগারের পরিবেশ দেখে পরিষ্কার বোঝাই যাচ্ছিল এটি পরিকল্পিতভাবেই ঘটানো হয়েছিল এবং সেই পরিকল্পনার অংশ হিসেবে ঘটনার পেছনের লোকজন ২০-২১ দিন আগেই এখানে ঢুকেছিল।

পনের বছর আগে পিলখানায় কথিত বিডিআর বিদ্রোহে সাতান্ন সেনা কর্মকর্তাসহ ৭৪ জনকে হত্যা করা হয়। এ ঘটনার পর বিডিআর মহাপরিচালকের দায়িত্ব পান মো. মইনুল ইসলাম। তার নেতৃত্বে বাংলাদেশ রাইফেলসের নাম পরিবর্তন করে বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশ-বিজিবি করা হয়। জুলাই ২০১৫ সালে তিনি সশস্ত্র বাহিনী বিভাগের প্রিন্সিপাল স্টাফ অফিসার হন। ২০১৬ সালের ফেব্রুয়ারিতে সেনাবাহিনী থেকে অবসর গ্রহণ করেন তিনি। পিলখানার মর্মান্তিক ঘটনার নানা দিক নিয়ে কথা বলেন তিনি।


বাংলা আউটলুক: বিদ্রোহের ৪৮ ঘণ্টার মাথায় ২৮ ফেব্রুয়ারি আপনাকে তৎকালীন বিডিআর’র দ্বায়িত্ব দেয়া হলো; পিলখানায় গিয়ে কী দেখলেন?

লেফটেন্যান্ট জেনারেল (অব.) মো. মইনুল ইসলাম: চারদিকে অস্ত্র, গোলাবারুদ ও গ্রেনেড ছড়ান-ছিটান। সেখানে যে ধরনের হত্যাযজ্ঞ হয়েছে, তার তেমন কোনো আলামত ছিল না। কোনো রক্তের চিহ্ন নেই। খুব যত্নে ধুয়ে-মুছে পরিপাটি করে রাখা হয়েছে। ওই দিনই সন্ধ্যায় পিলখানা থেকে যারা বাইরে চলে গিয়েছিল, তাদের ফিরে আসার আহ্বান জানানো হয় টেলিভিশনে। আমি তখন মহাপরিচালক, আমিই জানি না। সবখানে অস্ত্রশস্ত্র, গ্রেনেড ছড়িয়ে-ছিটিয়ে আছে। আমি জানালাম, এখনই ঢোকানো যাবে না।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আপনি পরবর্তীতে যে তদন্ত কমিটি হয়েছিল, সেই কমিটিতে ছিলেন; পরিবেশ পরিস্থিতি দেখে কী মনে হয়েছিল? এটি কি হঠাৎই ঘটেছিল?

মইনুল ইসলাম: হ্যাঁ। বর্তমান প্রধান নির্বাচন কমিশনার হাবিবুল আউয়াল তখন সচিব ছিলেন। তিনিও ওই কমিটিতে ছিলেন। আমি সিভিলদের নিয়ে তদন্ত করার অনুরোধ করেছিলাম। সরকারকে চিঠিও দিয়েছিলাম। ঘটনার আগে-পরে চাইনিজদের বিষয়গুলোও আমলে নিতে বলেছিলাম। সেই সময়ের কন্ট্যাক্টগুলোর ব্যপারেও খোঁজ নিতে বলা হয়েছিল। ইন্ডিয়ার বিষয়েও খোঁজ নেয়া জরুরি ছিল।

বাংলা আউটলুক: চাইনিজরা ওই দিন কী করছিল?

মইনুল ইসলাম: তখন বিডিআর’র সাধারণ আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র ক্রয়ের কার্যক্রম চলমান ছিল। এগুলো ছিলো স্নাইপার রাইফেল। সেগুলো চীন ডেলিভারি দেওয়ার পর সে সম্পর্কে বিডিআর সদস্যদের ধারণা দিতে একটি টিম পিলখানায় অবস্থান করছিল। ঘটনার দিন গোলাগুলি কিছুটা বন্ধ হলে তারা নিরাপদেই বের হয়ে গিয়েছিল। তদন্তে তাদের বিষয়েও খোঁজ নেয়া প্রয়োজন ছিল।

1708884136ana.jpg


বাংলা আউটলুক: ইন্ডিয়ানদের প্রসঙ্গ আসলো কেন?

মইনুল ইসলাম: স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ চলাকালে ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফ পাক বাহিনীর বিরুদ্ধে বাংলাদেশের বর্ডারের খুব কাছে অবস্থান নিয়েছিল। যুদ্ধের পর ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফ কয়েকটি ঘাঁটি ছেড়েছিল। আবার কোথাও কোথাও ছাড়েনি। বিডিআরের তুলনায় ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফ দুর্বল ছিল। কারণ বিএসএফের কমান্ডিংয়ে আর্মি ছিল না। কিন্তু বিডিআরের কমান্ডে ছিল আর্মি। ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফ তাদের ক্যাম্পের সীমা পেরিয়ে বাংলাদেশের বেশ কয়েকটি বিওপিতে অবস্থান করছিল সেই মুক্তিযুদ্ধ চলাকালে। ১৯৭৫ সালের পর ১৯৮১ সালের আগে ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফকে বাংলাদেশের বিওপি ছাড়তে বাধ্য করার জন্য বেশ কয়েকটি অপারেশন শুরু হয়েছিল। অপারেশনে ইন্ডিয়ান বিএসএফ পিছু হটতে বাধ্য হয়েছিল। ইন্ডিয়া এটার কাউন্টার কখনো করেনি বা করতে পারেনি। সেই সক্ষমতা বিএসএফের ছিলও না। সেই সুযোগও বিএসএফ পায়নি। ইন্ডিয়া সবসময়ই চেয়েছিল, কীভাবে বাংলাদেশ সেনাবাহিনীকে দুর্বল করা যায়। পিলখানা হত্যাকাণ্ড ছিল মোক্ষম সময়। সেনাবাহিনীর সবগুলো মেধাবী কর্মকর্তাকে দু’দিনের মধ্যে গুলি করে মেরে ফেলা হলো। এটা সবাই সেভাবেই দেখে। এই বিষয়টিও তখন আমলে নেয়া জরুরি ছিলো, বিভিন্ন পক্ষ থেকে কথাও এসেছিল। এর ওপর পিলখানার পরিস্থিতি বিশেষ করে অস্ত্রাগারের পরিবেশ দেখে পরিষ্কার বোঝাই যাচ্ছিল এটি পরিকল্পিত ভাবেই ঘটানো হয়েছিল এবং সেই পরিকল্পনার অংশ হিসেবে ঘটনার পেছনের লোকজন ২০-২১ দিন আগেই এখানে ঢুকেছিল।

বাংলা আউটলুক: ইন্ডিয়ার সম্পৃক্ততা কি আপনাদের অনুমান ছিলো? না কোনো আলামত পেয়েছিলেন?

মইনুল ইসলাম: আমাদের কাছে মনে হয়েছে। সিম্পটমগুলো (লক্ষণ) ফুটে উঠেছিল, বিভিন্ন সময় ইন্ডিয়ান পত্রপত্রিকায় লেখালেখি হয়েছিল। তারা বিরোধিতা করেছিল কেন বাংলাদেশের বর্ডার গার্ড আর্মি দ্বারা পরিচালিত হয়। ইন্ডিয়া সবসময়ই বিডিআরের কমান্ডিংয়ে আর্মি এবং ১৯৮১ সালের আগের বেশ কয়েকটি অপারেশন এবং পরবর্তিতেও বেশ কয়েকটি অপারেশন নিয়ে প্রতিশোধপরায়ণ ছিল। তারা চেষ্টাও করেছিল। এখানেই পরিষ্কার, এখানে ইন্ডিয়ার ইন্ধন ছিল। আমরা যখন বিডিআর (বিজিবি) রিফর্ম করি তখনও ইন্ডিয়ানদের অনেক বাধার মুখে পড়েছি। আর্মি কেন বিডিআরকে কমান্ড করে এটাও ইন্ডিয়া সহ্য করতে পারত না। সঠিক তদন্ত করলে নিশ্চয়ই বেরিয়ে আসত। আরো অনেকের সম্পৃক্ততা ছিল। তা-ও বেরিয়ে আসত।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আর কাদের সম্পৃক্ততা ছিল বলে মনে হয়েছে?

মইনুল ইসলাম: স্থানীয় রাজনৈতিক একটি পক্ষের সম্পৃক্ততা ছিল। বিদ্রোহের আগে বেশ কয়েকবার স্থানীয় ক্ষমতাসীন দলের নেতারা সদর দপ্তরে বিভিন্ন ক্যাম্পে দ্বায়িত্ব পালনকালে অসদুপায় অবলম্বনের দায়ে বিডিআরের অভিযুক্ত জওয়ানদের পক্ষে দাবি নিয়ে যেতে দেখা গেছে। বিদ্রোহের দিন বিডিআরের কিছু লোক রিভেঞ্জ (প্রতিশোধপরায়ণ) ছিল। তাদের সাথে আশপাশের বিভিন্ন রাজনৈতিক দলের লোকজন ছিল। কেন বিডিআর আর্মি অফিসার দ্বারা পরিচালিত হবে- এসব নিয়ে কথাও বলেছেন তারা। ঘটনার দিন পিলখানায় গোলাগুলি চলছে, আশপাশের সাধারণ মানুষ জীবন নিয়ে নিরাপদে সরে যাচ্ছিলেন। আর পাশেই বিদ্রোহীদের পক্ষে আজিমপুরে ‘জয় বাংলা’ স্লোগান দিয়ে আওয়ামী লীগ রাস্তায় মিছিলও করেছে। নিশ্চয়ই তাদেরও সমর্থন ছিল এই ঘটনায়। আর তারাও নিশ্চিত ছিল তাদের ওপর কেউ গুলি করবে না। সেগুলোও তদন্ত করা হয়নি। সবকটি পক্ষ মিলেই আর্মিকে শেষ করে দেয়ার ষড়যন্ত্র করেছিল।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আর কী কী দুর্বলতা বা অসামঞ্জস্যতা দেখেছিলেন সেই দিন?

মইনুল ইসলাম: প্রতি বছরই একই প্রোগ্রাম হয়, একই আয়োজন থাকে। গতানুগতিকই কিছু কমিটি থাকে। কমিটিগুলোতে বিডিআরের অফিসারদেরই (ডিএডি) ইনচার্জ করা হতো। কিন্তু ওই বছরই (২০০৯ সালে) সকল কমিটির হেড করা হয়েছিল আর্মি থেকে আসা অফিসারদের। কেন আর্মি অফিসারদের প্রধান করা হলো? আর আর্মি অফিসরাদের সাথে আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র দেয়া হলো না। আগ্নেয়াস্ত্রের কমান্ডিং ক্ষমতা রাখা হলো বিডিআর অফিসারদের (ডিএডি) নিয়ন্ত্রণে। তার মানে আর্মি অফিসারদের হাতে কোনো অস্ত্র দেয়া হলো না। অস্ত্র থাকল বিডিআরদের হাতেই। এ বিষয়টিরই তো হিসেব মেলেনি। এর কারণটা কী? আগে-পরে করা হলো না; কিন্তু ওই বছর কেন করা হলো? এটা তো দরকার ছিল না। করা হলো, কিন্তু আগে যখন বিডিআর’র ডিএডিরা এই দ্বায়িত্বে ছিল, তখন আগ্নেয়াস্ত্র বহন করার অনুমোদন ছিল, কিন্তু যখন আর্মি অফিসারদের ওইসব কমিটির প্রধান করা হলো, অস্ত্র দেয়া হলো, কিন্তু বিডিআর’র নিয়ন্ত্রণে রাখা হলো কমান্ডিং পাওয়ার।

বাংলা আউটলুক: অস্ত্রাগার, গোলাবারুদের দ্বায়িত্বে কারা ছিল?

মইনুল ইসলাম: আর্মির অফিসারদের দায়িত্বে ছিল। গার্ড কমান্ডাররা তাদের গ্রেফতার করেছিল। গোলাবারুদ এবং অস্ত্রাগার সবই লুট হয়েছিল। সব তো নিয়ে বের হয়ে যায়নি। যার যখন যা লেগেছে, তারা নিয়ে বেরিয়ে গেছে। যখন হিসেব শুরু হলো, কতগুলো ছিল, কতগুলো আমরা পেলাম, তা না হলে তো স্টক (মজুত) মিলবে না। গোলাবারুদ এবং অস্ত্র সব গণনা করা হলো। সমস্ত গোলাবারুদের বক্স থাকে সিল করা। যেগুলো সিলড সেগুলো চেক করিনি। বক্সের ওপর ওজন লেখা থাকে, মেপেছি। স্যাম্পল চেক করেছি, ঠিক ছিল। যেগুলো ঠিক ছিল না, সেগুলো চেক করে দেখেছি। গ্রেনেডের ভেতরে ফিউজ দেওয়া। মানে রেডি টু ইউজ (ব্যবহারের জন্য প্রস্তুত করা)। এটা কী করে সম্ভব! গ্রেনেড এবং ফিউজ আলাদা বক্সে থাকে। এটি ছিলো অস্বাভাবিক ঘটনা। এরকম অনেকগুলো বক্স ছিল। এটি আগে থেকেই রেডি করা ছিল। তার মানে আগে থেকেই ভেতর থেকে কেউ এ কাজ করেছে। পূর্বপরিকল্পিত ভাবে করা হয়েছে। এ বিষয়টিও তদন্ত করা হয়নি। আমাদের খতিয়ে দেখতেও দেয়া হয়নি।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আপনি কী বলতে চাইছেন, এই বিদ্রোহে প্রত্যক্ষ মদদ ছিলো?

মইনুল ইসলাম: অবশ্যই ইন্ডিয়ার মদদ ছিলো। কারণ আমাদের তো আর কোনো শত্রু ছিলো না। মিয়ানমারের কিছুই করার ছিল না।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আপনাদের তদন্ত প্রক্রিয়ায় কোন প্রতিবন্ধকতা ছিলো?

মইনুল ইসলাম: আমরা ডিজিএফআই, এনএসআই, এনটিএমসি এদের যুক্ত করে তদন্ত করার কথা বলেছিলাম। কে কার কাছে কল করছে, কী বলছে। এসব বিষয় বের করার জন্য কল রেকর্ড বের করতে বলেছিলাম। এ রকম একটি অস্বাভাবিক ঘটনায় অনেক ধরনের আলামত থাকে, সেগুলো বের করা জরুরি ছিলো। কিন্তু তা করতে দেয়া হয়নি। তথ্য চেয়েও আমরা পাইনি। বলা হয়েছিল, এগুলো সিক্রেট। তাহলে আমরা তদন্ত করব কীভাবে? এ বিষয়ে সরকারকে এটা চিঠিও দিয়েছিলাম। বর্তমান প্রধান নির্বাচন কমিশনার হাবিবুল আউয়াল আমাদর কমিটির প্রধান ছিলেন।

বাংলা আউটলুক: তদন্তে আর কী কী অস্বাভাবিক ঘটনা পেয়েছিলেন?

মইনুল ইসলাম: আরেকটি বিষয়, আমাদের কাছে খটকা লেগেছিল। সেটি হচ্ছে পিলখানার ভেতরে দু’দিনব্যাপী অফিসারদের হত্যা করা হচ্ছিল। ভেতর থেকে বাঁচার আকুতি শোনা যাচ্ছিল। বাইরে র‌্যাব ঘিরে রেখেছিল। আর্মি ভেতরে ঢুকতে চেয়েছিল। কিন্তু তখন আর্মিকে বলা হয়েছিল, ভেতরে ঢুকলে দেশে গৃহযুদ্ধ বেঁধে যাবে। তাদের ঢুকতে দেয়া হলো না কেন? এখানে অবশ্যই কোনো একটা অদৃশ্য শক্তি ইশারা করেছে। তাদের নির্দেশেই আর্মিকে ভেতরে ঢুকতে দেয়া হয়নি। এটা পরিষ্কার।

বাংলা আউটলুক: আপনারা তদন্ত প্রতিবেদন জমা দিয়েছিলেন?

মইনুল ইসলাম: আমরা একটা প্রতিবেদন জমা দিয়েছিলাম। আলামত নষ্ট হয়ে যাওয়া, তথ্য চেয়ে না পাওয়ায় আমাদের সেই প্রতিবেদন আমলে নেয়া হয়নি। আমাদের ৭-৮ জনের ওই তদন্ত কমিটি একসাথে মিটিংও করতে পারিনি।

বাংলা আউটলুক: পিলখানা হত্যাকাণ্ডের বিচার শেষ হয়েছে, আপনার মন্তব্য কি?

মইনুল ইসলাম: এখানে দুই ধরনের অপরাধের বিচার হয়েছে। কিন্তু বিদ্রোহের কারণ এবং পরিকল্পনা বেরই করা হলো না।
 
পিলখানায় অফিসার হত্যাযজ্ঞে যেসব দাবি জানালো তাদের পরিবার |

 

Make probe report into BDR massacre public: Hafiz
Published :
Aug 17, 2024 21:54
Updated :
Aug 17, 2024 21:54


1723942408115.png


Newly appointed BNP Standing Committee member Major (retd) Hafizuddin Ahmed on Saturday demanded that the interim government make public the army's probe report into the 2009 BDR (Bangladesh Rifles) massacre, described as a mutiny by the ousted Awami League government.

He voiced this demand while speaking at a discussion organised by the Jatiyatabadi Muktijoddha Dal at the Jatiya Press Club, demanding the trial of Sheikh Hasina for ordering the police force to carry out the massacre of students and for banning the Awami League as a terrorist organisation.

However, Hafiz lamented that the report from this thorough investigation has yet to be disclosed. "We want the truth-finding report from the probe conducted under his leadership to be made public."

He, however, lamented that the report of this thorough investigation has yet to be disclosed. "We want the truth-finding report from the probe conducted under his leadership to be made public."

He bemoaned that the report of this thorough investigation has yet to be disclosed. "We want the truth-finding report of the probe conducted under his leadership to be made public."

Hafiz, a military officer-turned-politician, said the meritorious and smart army officers were given posting in BDR. “They were brutally killed due to conspiracies by the neighbouring country (India).”

He also criticised the slow progress of the mutiny trial, suggesting that it was moving so slowly that it might not be completed until the Day of Judgment.

The BNP leader called for the establishment of a special tribunal, if necessary, to promptly execute those who were sentenced to death for ensuring peace to the victims' souls.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred Bangladesh Rifles (now BGB) men staged an armed revolt at the Darbar Hall of the force's Pilkhana headquarters during the three-day "BDR Week".

A total of 74 people, including 57 Army officers, were killed in the massacre spread over two days.

Later, an inquiry committee was formed by the army under the leadership of Lt. General Jahangir Alam Chowdhury to investigate the massacre.

He also submitted the investigation report, but the Awami League government did not reveal it.

Hafiz, who was promoted from vice chairman to standing committee member of the BNP on Friday, urged India to make friendship with the people of Bangladesh.

“I would like to say to India, that we are very grateful for your cooperation in our Liberation War. You have fought alongside us during the war but don't try to be the master of this country, don't try to stand against the people," he said.

If BNP comes to power, Hafiz said their party will have friendly relations with India but the neighbouring country should not try to conspire against Bangladesh and its people.​
 
একটা সম্পদ দিয়ে কারো বাবা হারানোর কষ্ট চাপা দেওয়া যায় না। Pilkhana Tragedy


 
পিলখানা হ- ত্যাকান্ডে জড়িত শেখ হাসিনা, শেখ সেলিম, তাপসঃ রাকিন আহমেদ

 
[H3]পিলখানা হ/ত্যা/কা/ণ্ড: মরতে তো একদিন হবে, তোমারা ভয় পাচ্ছো কেন?: পার্ট ২[/H3]


 
পিলখানা হ/ত্যা/কা/ণ্ডের লো/মহ/র্ষক বর্ণনা দিলেন লে. কর্নেল সৈয়দ কামরুজ্জামান: পার্ট ১

 
পিলখানা হ/ত্যা/কাণ্ড: ‘আমার স্যারকে তোরা কেউ মা/রবি না’

 
৫৭ সেনা অফিসারকে মে'রে ফেললো, আমরা কিছুই বলতে পারিনি |

 
পিলখানার ঘটনা ছিল আন্তর্জাতিক চক্রান্ত |
Pilkhana tragedy was an international conspiracy


 
পিলখানার ঘটনা ছিল আন্তর্জাতিক চক্রান্ত |
Pilkhana tragedy was an international conspiracy




Very sad turn of events - and miscalculation on the part of the perpetrators if they thought they'd be able to get away with this.

Rather daring - I must say.
 

Full truth of BDR carnage a must
19 August, 2024, 00:00

VICTIM families of the 2009 carnage in the headquarters of the Bangladesh Rifles, now renamed as the Border Guard Bangladesh, term the earlier legal proceedings a mockery of justice, noting that partisan interests of the Awami League government, overthrown on August 5, clouded the investigation. Several hundred border guards took up arms against their officers deputed from the army in February 25–26, 2009, leaving 75 people, including 57 army officers, dead. Special courts imprisoned 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on rebellion charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka and two criminal cases — related to the murders and under explosive substances — are pending with the court. Members of the families of the slain officers at a press conference in Dhaka on August 18 said that the narrative of a dispute over benefits disparity between the BDR and the army was false, noting that it was done to deflect attention away from the motives. Terming the massacre an unprecedented event in which Awami League political figures, including the now-deposed prime minister, conspired with a foreign nation to orchestrate the killing, the families demanded an independent investigation commission.

This is, however, not the first time that the families have made such demands, but their call for justice and an independent investigation, as the son of the slain BDR director general alleges, was met with death threats from some Awami League leaders. Immediately after the carnage, two committees were formed, but neither could establish the motive or the masterminds. None of the reports were made public in their entirety and the families alleged that the report partially released had been revised three times before its publication. They, therefore, demanded that the reports should be made public immediately so that a transparent investigation of the incident could be possible. Many BDG soldiers, under trial and convicted, levelled serious allegations of custodial torture. International rights organisations condemned the unfair mass trial after the use of torture, particularly when the death penalty is involved. The Awami League regime, however, maintained its partisan narrative that the murderous event was a result of a dispute over material benefits between the two forces which is believed to have obstructed justice.

The allegations that a foreign government was involved in the carnage and a political party presiding over the government that time played an active role in it are too serious to have been left uninvestigated. The interim government must, therefore, take early steps to form an independent commission, as suggested by the High Court in 2017, and make all previous investigation reports public. People can now expect a credible investigation and the full truth of the BDR carnage, considering that the home affairs adviser to the interim government was the head of one of the earlier committees.​
 
Very sad turn of events - and miscalculation on the part of the perpetrators if they thought they'd be able to get away with this.

Rather daring - I must say.

Hasina should be sued and India should be brought down to its knees by aiding insurgency in North-East for masterminding the BDR Carnage.
 
[H3]'কর্ণেল গুলজারকে পিলখানায় হত্যা করেছিল মির্জা আজমের নেতৃত্বে যুবলীগ[/H3]


 

Families for fresh probe, making findings public
Tanzil Rahaman 24 August, 2024, 00:35

1724457053269.png

Families of military officers, who were killed during the BDR munity, pray for divine blessings for the salvation of the departed souls at the graveside at Banani Military Graveyard in Dhaka on 26 February, 2021. | New Age file photo

Families of the victims of the February 25–26, 2009 rebellion in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles demanded to the interim government a fresh inquiry into the killing of 75 people, including 57 army officials, to unearth the plot and plotters behind the carnage.

They also demanded public release of the findings, including the progress of the inquiries already carried out by the Bangladesh Army and home ministry, for collecting proper evidence and prosecuting the perpetrators of the massacre at the headquarters of the border forces, later renamed as Border Guard Bangladesh.

Rakin Ahmed, son of slain former BDR director general Major General Shakil Ahmed and Naznin Ahmed, both of whom were murdered during the carnage, told New Age on Thursday that they appealed for fresh inquiries by the interim government to collect evidence.

In the aftermath of the massacre, the home ministry and Bangladesh Army launched separate inquiries, and now retired Lieutenant General Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, currently the home affairs adviser to the Professor Muhammad Yunus-led interim government, headed the army inquiry.

‘We know that the incumbent home affairs adviser Jahangir Alam was under pressure during the inquiry when the Awami League was in power. We demand a restart of the inquiry for collecting evidence and making it public,’ said Rakin.

On August 16, 2024, families had sent a statement to law adviser Asif Nazrul and home adviser Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman confirmed the matter to New Age.

‘We are the family members of the Bangladesh Army officers martyred in the BDR Pilkhana killings (Shaheed Families) on 25–26 February 2009. We, who are left behind, the martyrs’ mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters, spouses, sons and daughters, have endured profound despair for 15 years. Today we call upon the interim government to uphold our right to the truth and to justice, by taking the following measures,’ the statement read.

The statement called upon the interim government to take up eight measures.

Their first demand is to publicly release the reports of all investigations carried out into the tragedy, including those held by the home ministry and army.

Their second demand is setting up of an inquiry commission in the public interest following the High Court recommendations in its 2017 judgment (published in 2020) relating to the BDR Pilkhana killings to unearth the facts behind the carnage.

The victim families’ third demand is more institutional measures to commemorate the BDR tragedy—publishing a gazette declaring February 25 as ‘Shaheed Shena Dibash’; acknowledge each fallen officer as a ‘Shaheed’ or martyr; keeping the national flag at half-mast on every February 25; and include a chapter in school textbooks on the BDR Pilkhana tragedy recognising the sacrifices of the people martyred there.

They also demanded in the statement the release of the innocent ‘Jawans’ (former BDR soldiers) who have been wrongly detained in the cases relating to the 2009 rebellion.

Bangladesh Army officers who lost their jobs for rightfully voicing their opinions for proper justice must be reinstated or duly compensated, the statement added.

Slain Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique’s son, Saquib Rahman said that they demanded that justice must prevail and no innocent people get punished.

Neither law adviser Asif Nazrul nor home adviser Jahangir responded to phone calls and messages for comments.

Justice into the killings of 75 people, mostly army officers deputed in the erstwhile Bangladesh Rifles, has not been delivered even after about 16 years have passed after the carnage, while many former soldiers and civilians have been languishing in jail for years and dozens have died pending trials.

Those who were acquitted by a trial court in November 2013 of the murder charge have been in jail as another case related to explosive substances is still pending with the trial court.

On February 25, 2009, several hundred Bangladesh Rifles soldiers took arms against their officers deputed from the army at Durbar Hall during their annual gathering at the paramilitary force’s headquarters in Dhaka, leaving 75 people—57 army officers, two wives of army officers, nine BDR soldiers, five civilians, an army soldier, and a police constable—killed.

Border guard special courts sentenced 5,926 soldiers to varying terms on mutiny charges in 57 cases, including 11 in Dhaka, while two criminal cases—one filed for the murders and the other filed under the Explosive Substances Act—are still pending with the court.

The two major cases were investigated by the Criminal Investigation Department, and simultaneous trials started in 2011 against 850 riflemen and civilians.

In the middle of the trials, meanwhile, the court continued the trial of the case filed for murder and other offences, while slowing down the proceedings in the explosives case.

On November 5, 2013, additional sessions judge Akhtaruzzaman, who was later elevated to the High Court as a justice, pronounced the verdict in the murder case, sentencing 151 soldiers and civilian Zakir Hossain to death.

The court also jailed 160 soldiers, including late Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Nasiruddin Pintu and local Awami League leader and retired Bangladesh Rifles subedar Md Torab Ali who were handed life sentences, and 256 others for varying terms.

It acquitted 278 people. Four others died before the verdict.

Nehreen Ferdousi, wife of late colonel Md Mojibul Haque said that she did not believe that soldiers could do such massacre.

‘We demand that the masterminds are found out and brought to justice,’ Nehreen told New Age.

In November 2017, the special High Court bench of Justice Md Shawkat Hossain, Justice Md Abu Zafor Siddique, and Justice Md Nazrul Islam Talukder upheld the death sentences of 139 soldiers. It commuted the death sentences of seven soldiers and Md Zakir Hossain, then a local Awami League leader, to life in jail.

The court acquitted four soldiers of the charges, and BDR deputy assistant director Habibur Rahman died in jail custody in February 2014 while his appeal against the death sentence was pending with the High Court.

The High Court upheld the life terms of 146 BDR personnel and acquitted 12 others of their life terms. Two others died during the pendency of their appeals.

Both the government inquiry committee, headed by former secretary Anis-uz-Zaman Khan, and an investigation conducted by the army failed to identify the plot and the plotters. The report by Anis-uz-Zaman recommended an investigation into the failure to gather intelligence about the planned mutiny. The army did not make the results of its investigation public.

New York-based rights group Human Rights Watch said that it had obtained the report and stated that the report faulted the government for not having taken a stronger line against the Bangladesh Rifles before the rebellion.

The right group also urged the government to establish an independent investigative and prosecutorial task force with sufficient expertise, authority, and resources to rigorously investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute all allegations of unlawful deaths, torture and mistreatment of suspects in the BDR mutiny, regardless of the perpetrator’s rank or institutional affiliation.​
 
Back
Top