- Joined
- Jan 26, 2024
- Messages
- 235
- Likes
- 61
South Asia

Another important thing to remember is that Punjabi soldiers were about 62% of the British Indian Army's combatant forces, which had a total strength of 158,200. Whatever the British army did in India could not have taken place without the participation of the Punjabi soldiers. They also helped the British suppress the Sepoy mutiny of 1857, as they were the only army unit that did not take part in the mutiny against the British. This is especially true for the Punjabi Sikh soldiers.They also built the Indian and hindu identity
I think the punjabi soldiers are the reason India won any war against us if it did, I'm not too familiar with it, just things I've heardAnother important thing to remember is that Punjabi soldiers were about 62% of the British Indian Army's combatant forces, which had a total strength of 158,200. Whatever the British army did in India could not have taken place without the participation of the Punjabi soldiers. They also helped the British suppress the Sepoy mutiny of 1857, as they were the only army unit that did not take part in the mutiny against the British. This is especially true for the Punjabi Sikh soldiers.


You are 100% correct because not only Indian Punjabi generals and Soldiers but also our own Punjabi generals defeated us. Both General Niazi and General Jagjit Singh, Sujan Singh Uban, were Punjabis. Look at this list and find out very hard who is not a Punjabi :I think the punjabi soldiers are the reason India won any war against us if it did, I'm not too familiar with it, just things I've heard


www.drnorthrup.com


Yaar AK don't call yourself names. Wes all da same. There's no diff between us, unless you make it a dogged point. We are all working in our own way to de radicalize our people from da CIA Charlie Wilson/ Brezhinski/ Zia ul Fuq syndrome.punjabi traitors. today they are forgotten no british talks bout them or celebrates them. used like condom and thrown away.
































