[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
829
35K
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

QatarEnergy extends LNG force majeure for Bangladesh


1788309311650.webp


QatarEnergy has extended its force majeure on liquefied natural gas deliveries to Bangladesh, Pakistan and Italy amid continued disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

Bloomberg reported that QatarEnergy notified Pakistani buyers this week that LNG cargo cancellations would continue into October, while supplies to Bangladesh would remain suspended beyond September.

--------------------
However, Petrobangla director Md Shoyeb, who oversees the state-owned company's operations and mines, said on Tuesday that Petrobangla had not received any notification from QatarEnergy regarding an extension of the force majeure.

QatarEnergy first declared force majeure in March following disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz after the outbreak of the US-Iran war. Missile attacks on Qatar's Ras Laffan facilities also disrupted the country's LNG production and exports.

QatarEnergy is Bangladesh's largest supplier of imported LNG under a 15-year long-term supply contract. The company has traditionally notified buyers about force majeure declarations or extensions around a month in advance.

The reported extension comes as LNG shipments through the Strait of Hormuz remain severely constrained, raising uncertainty over supplies to countries dependent on Qatari LNG.

Bangladesh has already been grappling with a persistent gas shortage, which has affected electricity generation and industrial production.

To make up for shortfalls from long-term LNG suppliers, the government has increased procurement from the spot market, where LNG cargoes are currently priced at more than twice the rates under long-term contracts.​
 

Modernisation, Expansion of ERL

Govt inks $1.0b loan deal with IsDB

A deal for the Eastern Refinery modernisation and expansion project is inked on Thursday at the Secretariat in the presence of Prime Minister Tarique Rahman and Islamic Development Bank Group Chairman Dr Muhammad Sulaiman Al Jasser. — PID

The Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) on Thursday confirmed $1.0 billion in loans to enhance Bangladesh's oil-refining capacity three times, officials say.

The loan agreement was signed between the Economic Relations Division (ERD) and IsDB in the capital on Thursday.

ERD Additional Secretary Dr Mohammad Mizanur Rahman and Director General, Country Programs, IsDB, Anasse Aissami inked the deal on behalf of the Bangladesh government and the Jeddah-based lender, respectively.

Bangladesh's Prime Minister Tarique Rahman and IsDB visiting President Dr Muhammad Al Jasser witnessed the signing ceremony.

Eastern Refinery Ltd (ERL) Managing Director Md Sharif Hasant said, "The process of appointing a consultancy firm for the project is proceeding rapidly. We aim to accelerate the project so that the trial run of the second unit can be completed by 2030."

Energy Division officials say the Modernisation and Expansion of Eastern Refinery Ltd in Bangladesh project will enhance ERL's current refining capacity from 1.5 million tonnes to 4.5 million tonnes per year.

This will contribute to further strengthening the country's energy security, producing environment-friendly (Euro-5 standard) petroleum oil, and reducing dependence on imported refined fuel oil, they say.

Besides, this will allow the country to meet roughly 45-50 per cent of its domestic petroleum product demand.

Construction will begin by December 2026, and the project is targeted for completion by November 2030.

According to ERD, the 20-year loan features a five-year grace period and is split into two phases - $520.6 million for the first phase alongside a $600,000 grant, and $483 million for the second one.

It carries an interest rate of a six-month SOFR plus a 1.6 per cent spread, ERD officials say.

The expansion is projected to save Bangladesh $9-11 per barrel compared to importing pre-refined fuel, translating into an estimated annual savings of $237 million, Energy Division officials say.

It will also enable the processing of a wider variety of crude oils, including Russian crude, and produce eco-friendly Euro 5-standard fuel, they add.

IsDB is one of the trusted multilateral development partners of Bangladesh and has provided continuous support for the socioeconomic development of Bangladesh since its inception, in the form of grants, project loans, trade financing, private sector financing, export credit guarantees, etc.

Its President Dr Muhammad Sulaiman Al Jasser called on Prime Minister Tarique Rahman and expressed his deep commitment to supporting Bangladesh's development priorities.

Tarique emphasised that IsDB should explore opportunities for low-cost financing for its members, stating that Bangladesh would extend all possible cooperation to further deepen the Bangladesh-IsDB partnership.​
 

Billions of taka worth of gas lie unused for want of a Tk 6 billion pipeline!

Monoj Dey

1788651416300.webp

Bhola and surrounding areas are considered Bangladesh’s second most promising hydrocarbon hub.

The Middle East war, which began on 28 February following a joint US-Israeli attack and aggression against Iran, has now continued for more than six months. Although the battlefield is more than 3,500 kilometers away, the fallout from the war has hit Bangladesh’s cities, villages, and small towns alike. Fuel and electricity prices have risen once, but far from bringing the situation under control, the crisis has only deepened.

Load-shedding, which had spread across villages and small towns, is now in the capital too. The shortage of gas has driven up costs everywhere, from cooking at home to shopping in the markets. At CNG filling stations, motorists are unable to get gas even after waiting for long periods. Production has fallen across all factories, from food-processing plants to export-oriented industries. With fertiliser factories shut down, agricultural production, including the Aman rice crop, and food security are also coming under threat. Electricity shortages are disrupting healthcare services as well.

Nearly 50 per cent of Bangladesh’s energy and electricity generation depends on gas. The price Bangladesh is now paying, down to the last penny, is the result of the steady shift toward import dependence in the gas sector since 2016. The war in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s attack and aggression against Ukraine in February 2022, had already exposed just how disastrous this dependence on imports could become. Yet no lessons were learned from that crisis.

At a time when the entire country and economy are suffering from gas and energy shortages, what could be more unfortunate than being unable to use our own gas? When will the decision finally be made to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline?

The crisis began soon after the then-government celebrated 100 per cent electrification by setting off fireworks. As European countries stopped buying Russian gas, the price of relatively cheap LNG on the spot market rose sharply. Oil prices also continued to climb. Foreign exchange reserves began to deplete rapidly as the country spent more on purchasing fuel. Even after electricity and gas prices were raised repeatedly, the energy crisis remained unresolved.

The energy crisis pushed the entire economy toward disaster. According to government figures, inflation kept rising until it reached 13-14 per cent. Economic growth and employment began to lose momentum. The cumulative anger of poor and marginalised citizens who had suffered continuous losses in real income and employment, along with young people facing an uncertain future, erupted in July-August 2024.

The Iran war has once again laid bare Bangladesh’s energy insecurity. A recent World Bank report says that if the crisis in the Middle East is prolonged, Bangladesh could face the risk of losing around 600,000 jobs. Urea fertiliser prices could double. If disruptions in the supply of various agricultural inputs occur, small farmers could face a major blow both to their food security and their incomes. The most worrying finding is that if rice prices rise by 10 per cent because of a fertiliser shortage, another 1.4 million people could be pushed into poverty.

Only 40 to 42 per cent of Bangladesh’s total gas demand is met from domestic sources. The rest has to be supplied through imported LNG. Of the imported LNG, 55 to 60 per cent comes from the Middle East. The war is not only disrupting fuel transportation through the Strait of Hormuz; energy infrastructure in countries such as Qatar, from which Bangladesh imports LNG under long-term contracts, has also been damaged. As a result, five of Petrobangla’s six LNG supply contracts have been declared under “force majeure.” Bangladesh has been forced to purchase LNG from the spot market at more than twice the usual price.

Bangladesh has become trapped in a vicious cycle of crisis centered on energy shortages: unless a reliable energy supply can be ensured, the economy will remain stagnant, while investment and employment will not grow. The crisis in the energy sector did not emerge overnight, and its solution cannot be confined to addressing the present crisis alone.

Otherwise, with any new global crisis, whether caused by war, a pandemic, or something else, the country could once again find itself back at square one.

In 2017, the National Committee to Protect Oil, Gas, Mineral Resources, Power and Ports put forward a master plan for a sustainable solution to Bangladesh’s energy crisis. Recently, economist Anu Muhammad referred to that plan in an article in Prothom Alo titled “There Is a Sustainable Solution to the Gas and Electricity Crisis.”

He wrote that the best path for us is to combine building national capacity to extract our own gas resources with strong policy and institutional measures to realise the vast potential of renewable energy.

Professor Anwar Hossain Bhuiyan of the Department of Geology at the University of Dhaka identified increasing gas exploration and extraction from domestic sources as the most realistic solution in an interview with Prothom Alo on 23 August.

He believes that by developing existing gas fields and conducting deep drilling, using modern technology, and exploring for gas in areas between existing fields, Bangladesh could potentially recover 18 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas, combining current and potential reserves. An investment of Tk 100 billion in gas exploration could yield gas worth Tk 5 trillion.

1788651488702.webp

Although a decision was taken to supply gas from Bhola in CNG cylinders, the initiative proved ineffective. File photo: Prothom Alo

Despite having limited resources and a small workforce, Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company Limited (BAPEX) has had a relatively high success rate in drilling and exploring gas wells. Globally, drilling 8 to 10 wells to find gas in one is considered a successful exploration rate; in Bangladesh, gas has been found in one out of every three wells drilled. The country’s main hydrocarbon, or gas, hub is the region comprising Cumilla, Brahmanbaria, and Sylhet.

Geologists consider Bhola and its surrounding areas to be the country’s second-most promising hydrocarbon hub. Gas has already been discovered at Shahbazpur, Bhola North, and Ilisha, as well as at Sundarpur in Noakhali and in Feni. Gas has also been found offshore at Kutubdia and Sangu in the southern sea. Taken together, these discoveries make the entire region highly promising for gas exploration.

Gas production in Bangladesh has been declining steadily since 2016-17. Yet despite the discovery of substantial gas reserves in Bhola, the gas has not been brought into the national grid through a pipeline. When shortages emerged, authorities adopted stopgap measures to transport gas after converting it into LNG and CNG, but these solutions failed to address the problem. In 2018, a decision was taken to build a pipeline to bring gas from the island district of Bhola to the mainland.

A report by Bonik Barta says the project was left on the back burner during the Awami League government simply because of the need for Tk 6 billion. The pipeline was not built even after eight years, on the grounds that transporting the gas through a pipeline would not be economically viable. Yet the three gas fields discovered so far in Bhola alone hold nearly 5 TCF of gas, with a current market value of around Tk 5 trillion. Not even half of the fields’ daily production capacity is currently being extracted.

As a result, the biggest question is whether there are powerful vested interests behind the failure to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline. A pipeline was not built because Tk 6 billion was deemed too expensive, even though thousands of crores of taka have been provided in annual subsidies for LNG imports. The unfortunate reality is that the same pipeline that could have been built for Tk 6 billion at the time would now cost Tk 30-40 billion.

Even during the 18 months of the interim government, no specific decision was taken to bring Bhola’s gas into the national grid. The current government has also yet to decide whether the pipeline will extend to Khulna or Dhaka. At a time when the entire country and economy are suffering from gas and energy shortages, what could be more unfortunate than being unable to use our own gas? When will the decision finally be made to bring Bhola’s gas to the mainland through a pipeline?

* Manoj De is Editorial Assistant, Prothom Alo​
 

Pertamina to get O&M contract for BD's first SPM
1789106610109.webp


Indonesian state-run company -- PT Pertamina -- is all set to bag the operation and management (O&M) contract of Bangladesh's maiden single-point mooring (SPM) for carrying fuel from vessels in outer anchorage to onshore storage tanks.

The state-run Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) recently completed the evaluation for selecting the O&M contractor to initiate the operation of the country's much-needed oil carrying infrastructure two years after its installation, a senior official of the Energy and Mineral Resources Division (EMRD) under the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR) told The Financial Express on Thursday.

A total of 11 companies had purchased tender documents to compete in the bidding, and three of them submitted bids in February this year to carry out the job.

After inking the deal, the Indonesian company will carry out the operation and management job for five years.

The Indonesian company has been selected as the O&M contractor following re-tendering.

Pertamina was the lone bidder in the initial tender, which was cancelled due to higher than expected price quotes.

During the BPC's previous tender, the Indonesian company had quoted $117 million, which was around 33 per cent above the BPC's budget of $88 million, resulting in the cancellation, said sources.

The SPM has already been kept idle for two years, and the BPC is counting extra money while using lighter vessels to carry fuel from mother vessels to tanks onshore as a consequence.

Chinese firm China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Co Ltd (CPPEC) completed the construction of the SPM with a double-pipeline project and handed over the infrastructure to the BPC in August 2024.

The guarantee period to resolve faults in operations of the SPM, however, expired in February this year, much ahead of its commencement of commercial operation, it has been alleged.

The delay in starting operations of the SPM system is allegedly benefiting private operators, who are earning hefty profits by carrying fuel from outer anchorage to onshore storage through lighter vessels, at the expense of public money, industry insiders said.

Allegations are rife that a vested interest group, working in collusion with private sector beneficiaries, was playing a key role in delaying the SPM and its associated fuel pipelines and infrastructure.

The SPM system is used for piping petroleum from vessels far offshore and onshore storage tanks, thus slashing both time and cost of oil imports.

CPPEC built the SPM system after being selected as a contractor "unsolicitedly" under the currently repealed Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provision) Act 2010.

The project cost escalated by 60 per cent to Tk 80 billion from the initial target of Tk 50 billion.

The installation of the SPM with the double pipeline project was implemented with Chinese concessional loans of around $554 million.

Of the total, China provided around $467.84 million as preferential buyers' credit and the remaining $82.5 million was available as soft loan.

The Exim Bank of China provided the money, to be repaid within 20 years at an interest rate of 2.0 per cent per annum with five years' grace period.

As part of the project, a 220-kilometre pipeline has been installed, with most of it laid in the waters of the Bay of Bengal.

Six storage tanks have also been constructed.

The tanks have a combined capacity of 240,000 tonnes of petroleum products, with 150,000 tonnes designated for crude oil and 90,000 tonnes for gas oil.

Once it is fully executed, the BPC will be able to unload petroleum products from a 100,000-deadweight tonnage tanker within 48 hours, which now takes 11 days.

No lighter vessels would be required to carry fuel from mother vessel, which is now moored at the outer quay, after implementation of the project.

The BPC is currently paying around $5.50 per tonne to lighterage or small vessels, owned mainly by the Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (BSC) to ferry petroleum to its onshore tanks from larger mother vessels.

Once operational, the SPM will save the cost of the BPC in unloading fuel significantly.

The government will be able to save around Tk 8.0 billion alone by reducing transport costs of petro-products from outer anchorage to onshore fuel tankers, market insiders said.​
 

Building sufficient LNG storage facility


1789107269320.webp


Absence of adequate facilities to store liquefied natural gas (LNG) is an unresolved issue for which Bangladesh is paying a heavy price. The country has increasingly become dependent on imported LNG to meet its growing energy needs, yet it has built almost no buffer against disruptions in supply, bad weather or sudden technical failures. As a result, the country is often compelled to buy LNG for immediate consumption, regardless of whether international prices are favourable or prohibitively high.

The consequences are particularly costly. State-run Petrobangla frequently has to pay demurrage to global LNG suppliers when cargo vessels cannot unload their consignments. During the monsoon, rough weather can force LNG carriers to remain stranded in the deep sea, while floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) may suspend ship-to-ship transfer on safety grounds. Reports say, recently Petrobangla had to pay around US$5.0 million to UK-based TotalEnergies Gas & Power Ltd after one of its LNG cargoes remained stranded in the Bay of Bengal because Excelerate Energy's FSRU was out of operation following a fire. To receive the cargo at a later date, Petrobangla had to pay more than US$1.0 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in addition to the contracted price. This is hardly an isolated incident. Petrobangla previously had to cancel at least five spot LNG cargoes and pay penalties when Summit Group's FSRU was shut down following the devastation caused by Cyclone Remal in May 2024. Deliveries were also deferred during Cyclone Mocha the previous year. Such episodes expose the vulnerability of a system that has little room for immediate remedy. The contrast with petroleum products is striking. Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC), despite importing roughly the same annual volume of petroleum products, maintains storage equivalent to about 60 days of consumption and plans to raise it to 90 days. Why should LNG, which has become equally critical to the country's economy, be treated differently?

Bangladesh began importing expensive LNG in 2018 without developing corresponding storage capacity. It now has LNG regasification capacity of around 8.0 million tonnes a year and imports more than 7.0 million tonnes annually, yet remains almost entirely dependent on uninterrupted maritime delivery. An enhanced LNG storage facility would provide that missing buffer. Cargoes could be received when vessels arrive, stored for later use and released into the system when required. More importantly, Bangladesh could take advantage of periods of relatively low international LNG prices to build up reserves instead of being forced to purchase fuel when the market is overheated. Storage would also allow regasification to resume quickly after an FSRU returns to operation.

Energy security is not merely about securing supplies; it is also about having required storage facilities to keep them. Bangladesh has spent billions on importing LNG but has yet to invest adequately in the buffer that could protect those imports from weather, accidents, price shocks and geopolitical disruptions. That omission is becoming increasingly expensive. Building LNG storage may require substantial investment, but continuing without it is likely to cost the country much more.​
 

Power and energy: How costs can be reduced at every stage of the supply chain
The ongoing crisis in the electricity and energy sectors did not develop overnight. Why did this crisis occur? Where were the mistakes and failures in policy-making? What is the way out of this crisis? Energy expert M Shamsul Alam analyses these issues along with proposed solutions to the crisis.


1789108375606.webp
 

Energy roadmap key to attracting more US investment

AmCham to celebrate 30th anniversary

Refayet Ullah Mirdha

1789111584843.webp


Over the past 16-17 years, $5 billion has come in from the US as foreign direct investment. Syed Mohammad Kamal, President of AmCham

Major takeaways
​
  • $5b more US investment targeted​
  • Predictable energy roadmap needed​
  • Energy supply certainty crucial​
  • ICT, AI seen promising​
  • Cybersecurity remains a challenge​
  • IP violations deter investment​
  • AmCham plans global roadshows​

An energy security roadmap, an enabling investment climate and timely policies are among the major tasks for the government to attract more American investment in Bangladesh, said Syed Mohammad Kamal, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Bangladesh (AmCham).

Over its 30-year journey in Bangladesh, AmCham members have invested more than $5 billion in the country. In the next four to five years, the chamber aims to bring at least another $5 billion in US investment to Bangladesh, as there are opportunities here, Kamal also said.

The AmCham president talked with The Daily Star yesterday in an interview on the occasion of the chamber’s 30th anniversary in Bangladesh, which will be celebrated on September 12.

In 1996, AmCham started its journey here as the America-Bangladesh Economic Forum (ABEF), but the name was later changed to AmCham, he said.

When the ABEF started its journey 30 years ago, bilateral trade between Bangladesh and the US was below $1 billion, hovering around $653 million.

But in the last calendar year, bilateral trade in goods and services between the two countries reached $13.7 billion in 2025, up 10.3 percent, or $1.3 billion, from 2024, according to data from the US Trade Representative (USTR).

US goods imports from Bangladesh totalled $9.5 billion in 2025, up 13.4 percent, or $1.1 billion, from 2024. The US goods trade deficit with Bangladesh was $7.1 billion, a 16.3 percent increase, or $993.5 million, over 2024, the USTR data also said.

US services exports to Bangladesh in 2025 were $1.4 billion, up 7.6 percent, or $102.0 million, from 2024. US services imports from Bangladesh were $362.0 million, down 14.6 percent, or $62.0 million, from 2024.

Over the years, the US has also become the market leader in several sectors, such as garments, as the US is the single largest export destination for Bangladesh because of the higher volume of apparel shipments.

In terms of attracting US investment to Bangladesh, if the government provides a good energy roadmap as per its plan, it is possible to bring in higher American investment.

For instance, the government has announced that the energy situation will improve significantly in two years as it has been taking a lot of initiatives, he said.

Providing an energy roadmap will give American investors greater predictability and enable them to make the right investment decisions. The roadmap will also provide predictability regarding energy supply.

The roadmap should clearly state what will be achieved in six months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months.

For instance, if any project is undertaken to improve the energy situation and, after working for a few months, it is said that it will not be able to continue, then what will happen to local and foreign investors? So, the energy roadmap is very important for foreign investors, Kamal also said.

Over the past 16-17 years, $5 billion has come in from the US as foreign direct investment. During the next four and a half years of their tenure, it is possible to bring another $5 billion in US investment here.

The AmCham has identified several sectors, such as ICT, AI, energy, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals and cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a major challenge for foreign investment, as data privacy has also become a challenge here.

Another major challenge is the violation of intellectual property rights, as fake goods sometimes emerge as threats to original products because of violations of intellectual property rules.

American investment in Bangladesh has remained underutilised, although there is a great opportunity to demonstrate its capabilities.

The AmCham chief also lauded the government’s promise to deregulate rules and policies, which will ultimately facilitate and expedite the processes for attracting foreign investment if these are implemented as per the commitments.

Regarding the signing of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade between Bangladesh and the US, he said there has been a lot of criticism around this.

Google News LinkFor all latest news, follow The Daily Star's Google News channel.
“I think the question of what we got and what we gave is one area to consider. But we also need to remember that if we look at our latest imports -- we know that we import less than $2 billion from the United States, while we export $11-13 billion to them,” he said.

Advocating the ART, he said there are many positive sides of the agreement which also need to be explored for exporting, importing and more investment between the two countries.

The government is looking for a cashless economy, or a cashless Bangladesh. Going fully cashless is probably not that easy, as perhaps Bangladesh will start with less cash and eventually become cashless. Because until now, 28 percent of transactions are cashless and 72 percent are conducted in cash, he added.

Here, all players need to be able to participate properly. We need to ensure that everyone can play in the areas where they have capabilities.

For example, we have seen Bangla QR being promoted over time. But Bangla QR is just one tool.

There are many other options: mobile financial services, cards like ours, and others.

Everyone has different capabilities, and they should all be able to remain players and help accelerate the transition to a cashless economy. The incentive the government has announced is not enough.

Currently, AmCham has 270 members. In Bangladesh, if it is about large American companies with direct investment, there are only around 56 or 57, maybe 60, he added, saying that AmCham will hold roadshows in different countries to attract more investment.​
 

Move on to secure foreign financing for solar megaproject


1789192473892.webp

FE file photo

The government has started exploring funds from Bangladesh's development partners to bankroll its ambitious rooftop solar project, according to sources.

To materialise the rooftop solar ambition the Power Division recently requested the Finance Division to arrange US$2.0 billion from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), sources said.

After receiving the request, the Finance Division is now exploring ways to arrange funds for financing projects aimed at generating an additional 3,000 to 4,000 megawatts of electricity from rooftop solar before next summer.

Earlier, government high-ups had ordered diversion of necessary funds from the development budget as the private-sector renewable-energy producers suggested fundraising for financing rooftop solar-power generation.

1789192510445.webp


Sources have said the Power Division on August 31 wrote the letter to the Finance Division urging to obtain $2.0-billion support from the ADB for the expansion of rooftop solar.

Tahmilur Rahman, a senior assistant secretary, in the letter wrote that to reduce dependency on fossil fuels, generate clean and eco-friendly electricity, decrease financial risks in the power sector, achieve greater self-reliance, and attain SDG targets, the government formulated the 'National Renewable Energy Development Strategy 2026-2030" which was approved by the cabinet last July.

The strategy sets a target to achieve 20 per cent of total electricity generation from renewables by 2030. Among this, the target for generating electricity from rooftop solar is 5,500mw.

"Considering the country's current electricity situation and the anticipated electricity demand for the upcoming summer season, generating an additional 3,000 to 4,000 megawatts of electricity from rooftop solar before next summer is under active consideration," he wrote.

Mr Rahman also mentioned that plans have been made to create new entrepreneurs and service providers, install solar systems nationwide, provide necessary incentives, and expand the coverage of the net-metering system.

"Adequate and sustainable financing is crucial to enhance the necessary capacity of the power and energy sector and ensuring sustainable development. As a developing nation, active participation from international development agencies is necessary to implement this government initiative," he added.

Mr Rahman also has written that examples are there where various international development agencies provide effective assistance to developing countries through direct loan support for expanding renewable energy, especially rooftop solar projects.

Therefore, he requested arranging some $2.0 billion from the ADB to catalyse the renewable-energy sector, including the expansion of rooftop solar, and to achieve the targets set by the government.

A Finance Division official told The Financial Express that the funds cannot be arranged under budget-support programme but rooftop solar-related projects can be taken for which financial supports can be sought from the development partners.

Contacted, president of Bangladesh Sustainable and Renewable Energy Association (BSREA) Mostafa Al Mahmud said a large sum of financial support is necessary to materialise the government's target of generating 3,000 to 4,000mw electricity from rooftop solar before next summer.

"During a meeting with Power Division officials last month, we made it clear that without financial backup the initiative won't move forward," he said.

Mr Mahmud guesses that the government is probably creating a Tk 20-billion fund to finance the effort to enhance green-power generation.

"Foreign funds can be a good option for the government since many multilateral development partners provide low-cost funds for clean-energy generation," he notes.

According to Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA), presently, the country has the installed capacity to generate 1,852 megawatts of electricity from renewable sources.​
 

Bangladesh's energy security, future plans highlighted at Tokyo LNG conference


State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Aninda Islam Amit today highlighted Bangladesh's current energy situation, key challenges and future plans at an international LNG conference in Tokyo.

He presented Bangladesh's energy outlook while participating in the 15th LNG Producer-Consumer Conference 2026 at a hotel here.

The conference was held under the theme "Advancing LNG for the Future: Resilience and Reliability."

The state minister stressed the importance of reliability, diversification, affordability and flexibility in ensuring modern energy security.

He said energy security could no longer be viewed simply in terms of the availability of energy, as geopolitical changes, supply disruptions and instability in global fuel markets have created new challenges.

Highlighting Bangladesh's energy situation, Amit said fuel consumption was rising rapidly due to population growth, industrialisation, urbanisation and increasing electricity demand.

Although natural gas remains a key fuel for power generation, fertiliser production, industries and commercial activities, domestic production is insufficient to meet the growing demand, he said.

As a result, imported liquefied natural gas (LNG) has become an increasingly important part of the country's gas supply system.

The state minister said Bangladesh currently receives around 1,100 million cubic feet of LNG per day through two floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), while the country's annual LNG demand stands at nearly 7 million tonnes.

To meet the growing demand, necessary infrastructure expansion work is progressing rapidly, he said.

Under the plan, an additional FSRU with a capacity of 600 million cubic feet per day is expected to be launched in Maheshkhali by 2028, while a land-based LNG terminal with a capacity of 1,000 million cubic feet per day is planned for Matarbari by 2030.

Bangladesh also plans to increase its LNG supply by an additional 3 to 4 million tonnes per annum between 2026 and 2030, with the volume projected to reach 17 to 18 million tonnes per annum during 2031-2040.

On supply diversification and international investment, Amit said Bangladesh was procuring LNG from multiple sources through government-to-government agreements, requests for quotation and direct procurement.

He said the government had adopted transparent and investment-friendly policies to attract international investors to the sector.

The state minister emphasised the importance of mutual participation and international cooperation in building a safe, reliable, cost-effective and sustainable energy future.

He said Bangladesh would continue working with friendly countries and international partners to strengthen long-term energy security.​
 

Gas troubles to ease by this evening

Prime Minister rolls out plans during meet with business leaders for short-and long-term solution to gas, power crises


1789426622214.webp

Prime Minister Tarique Rahman presides over a meeting on challenges and future roadmap of the power and energy sector at the secretariat in the capital on Monday. — PID

Gas-supply situation across Bangladesh will improve by Tuesday evening, Prime Minister Tarique Rahman said Monday while rolling out short-and long-term remedies for gas-power crises during a meeting with business leaders.

He sought support from all concerned in carrying out the government-broached comprehensive power-and-energy roadmap to boost power and natural-gas supply and ensure the country's future energy security.

The masterplan comprises installing more floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) and land-based LNG terminals, expediting oil-and gas explorations, building more coal-fired power plants and boosting renewable-energy installations.

State Minister for the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR) Aninda Islam Amit presented a detailed plan titled 'Challenges and Future Roadmap for Bangladesh's Power and Energy Sector' during the meeting at the Prime Minister's Office in the Secretariat, with Tarique Rahman chairing the session.

Assuring the immediate relief from gas crunch facing industries and households, the premier explained that the recent gas shortage stemmed from an accident at one of the country's two floating LNG terminals, which disrupted supply to industries, power plants, households, and other gas-guzzling consumers.

"We hope, Inshallah, from tomorrow evening, gas supply will be restored to the condition it was one and a half months ago," he said.

He also said the construction of the country's third floating LNG terminal will be completed within the next two years.

"Energy crisis is an inherited problem," he said, adding: "The government has identified the problems, developed plans, and is now in the implementation phase."

"Planning and execution take time. These challenges were passed on to us, and solving them requires patience and cooperation," said the head of government.

He stressed that uninterrupted energy supply is essential for Bangladesh to achieve its target of becoming a $1.0-trillion economy by 2034.

The Prime Minister appealed to the business community to remain patient and supportive as the government works to stabilise power-and energy supply.

"When businesses suffer, the entire economy suffers. Resolving power and energy crisis is not just about industry-it is about national growth," he noted.

He also called on the media to play a constructive role by clearly communicating government plans to the public.

"If the media understands our objectives, they can present them accurately to the people, avoiding confusion and misinformation," Rahman explained, adding that transparency is central to his government's approach.

"We are not hiding the problems. We are openly discussing them and explaining how we plan to solve them. There is no reason for despair."

The Prime Minister warns that political instability could undermine economic progress. He urged all stakeholders to allow the government to complete its planned initiatives during its tenure.

"The people will decide who governs, but whichever government is in power should be given the chance to implement its plans," he told his business audience.

In his presentation the MPEMR state minister clearly explained a roadmap to businessmen and media representatives on how the government will reduce the gap between electricity demand and supply by 2030.

By 2030, there will be no gap between demand and supply, he said, adding that the government aims to raise power-generation capacity to 20,500megawatts by 2027, 22,500MWs by 2028, 26,500MWs by 2029 and 31,300MWs by 2030.

Mr Amit attributed the recent crisis primarily to the war between the US and Iran, saying that around 70 per cent of Bangladesh's liquefied natural gas (LNG) comes from the Middle East through the now-troubled Strait of Hormuz.

The accident at the Maheshkhali FSRU facility subsequently aggravated the situation, he said.

The current dismal power-and energy situation is an outcome of wrong policies, indecision and a lack of proper planning by the previous Awami League government, he said.

The state minister also alleged that the previous government had provided special advantages to certain quarters through the now-defunct Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply (Special Provisions) Act 2010.

He also opined that the accident at the FSRU, which triggered gas crisis, led to an escalation in electricity demand as the commoners went for electric stoves for cooking.

Electricity-driven three-wheelers, locally named Banglar Tesla, are also consuming around 3,000-4,000MW electricity, he said.

Electricity demand increased by 17 per cent to 18,178 MWs this September compared to 15,271 MWs in September 2025.

Country's overall gas supply fell to around 2,300 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) in September 2026 due to the FSRU accident from 2,607mmcfd in September 2025.

The government plans to raise available generation capacity by 3,000-4,000MWs from rooftop solar systems with a cost of Tk 10.50 per unit.

The planned generation mix by 2030 includes 6,000MWs from coal-fired plants, 6,000MW s from gas-fired plants, 4,000MWs from liquid-fuel plants, 3,000-4,000MWs from rooftop solar and 2,500MWs through electricity imports, the MPEMR state minister said.

A new 195MW gas-fired power plant will be installed in Bhola island to utilise the tapped gas, he told the meet.

The government has reduced government expenditure by around Tk 5.0 billion annually by reducing tariffs of some 19 power plants after reviewing their power- purchase agreements (PPAs), he said, adding that discussions are underway with another 51 power plants to cut the tariff rates.

Mr Amit said the industries that have already applied for gas connections would receive those connections by 2030.

The government is also discussing the possibility of importing gas from neighbouring Myanmar, he said.

To boost domestic gas exploration, two rigs will be procured for state-owned Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company (Bapex).

Foreign exploration companies are also being encouraged to work jointly with Bapex in exploring new gas reserves.

He also defended Bangladesh's fuel prices, saying that the country still has some of the lowest fuel prices in the world. While Bangladesh increased the price of diesel by 15 per cent, Myanmar raised it by 71.9 per cent and Pakistan by 40 per cent.

The government has planned to build new coal-fired power plants at Payra and Matarbari, and Barapukuria with the capacities of 1,320MWs, 1,320MWs, and 300MWs respectively.

It also has planned to modernise the transmission and distribution network to improve the reliability of power supply and reduce system losses.

"The government has also planned to utilise local coal utilising environment- friendly modern technologies taking into account the local people's concerns," he told function.

Smart prepaid meters will be introduced to reduce system losses and eliminate irregular or "ghost" bills, while electricity imports through regional cooperation will be expanded.

Prime Minister Tarique Rahman's Gulshan residence will be fully solar-dependent from next week, said the MPEMR state minister responding to a set of queries from the media.

Commerce Minister Khondaker Abdul Muktadir, PM's Finance Adviser Rashed Al Mahmud Titumir and Education Adviser Mahdi Amin as well as top business leaders also spoke at the problem-shooting meeting.

Among the business figures who spoke were President of the International Chamber and Commerce (ICC) - Bangladesh Mahbubur Rahman and Administrator of the Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FBCCI) Md Fazlul Haq. Senior journalists and TV commentators also spoke.​
 

Gas supply finally improves
Staff Correspondent 15 September, 2026, 08:44

1789451761351.webp

Representational image created with the help of AI

Bangladesh’s regasified liquefied natural gas supply rose to 980 million cubic feet per day at 10:00pm on Monday, pushing total gas supply to 2,582 mmcfd -- the highest level since a fire-hit floating LNG terminal went offline on July 21.

Petrobangla, the state-owned Oil, Gas and Mineral Resources Corporation, reported that the Excelerate Energy-operated Moheshkhali LNG terminal ramped up its supply to 500 mmcfd at 9:05pm on Monday, contributing significantly to the improvement.

The other floating LNG terminal, operated by Summit Power International, was supplying 480 mmcfd to the national gas grid at the time, according to Petrobangla data.

The combined RLNG supply of 980 mmcfd marked a significant improvement from the severely reduced supply levels witnessed over the past several weeks following the fire incident at the Excelerate terminal.

The Excelerate terminal had been operating below capacity for days as its LNG inventory ran dry amid delays in securing additional cargoes through direct government procurement.

The terminal had also been operating at reduced capacity since the July 21 fire damaged one of its boilers, disrupting its normal regasification capacity.

The country’s two floating storage and regasification units have a combined capacity to send out 1,100 mmcfd of gas to the grid.

The latest increase in RLNG supply is expected to ease the prolonged gas shortage that has disrupted industrial production and power generation across the country.​
 

Govt plans 5 new LNG terminals by 2035


1789533470107.webp


The government plans to build five new liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals by 2035 to boost gas supplies for industrialisation as domestic natural gas production declines rapidly.

The planned facilities comprise three floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) and two land-based LNG terminals, State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Aninda Islam Amit said at a meeting with top business leaders and senior journalists at the Secretariat on Monday. Prime Minister Tarique Rahman chaired the meeting.

One of the three planned FSRUs will be located at Kutubjom, in deep water off Moheshkhali in Cox's Bazar, under a government-to-government proposal from a Chinese company. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs gave policy approval on July 28 to process the proposal.

The Chinese-built FSRU will have a regasification capacity of around 174,000 cubic metres of LNG, about 26 per cent higher than the roughly 138,000 cubic metres capacity of the two existing FSRUs, Amit said.

The terminal is expected to start supplying regasified LNG by mid-2028, potentially adding 600 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) to the country's regasification capacity, he said.

The larger FSRU will also be able to receive LNG from bigger vessels, helping reduce import costs, he added.

The government expects to sign a deal for another FSRU of similar size by December 2026. It is also examining the feasibility of urgently setting up at least one more FSRU in southwestern Bangladesh or near Payra or Mongla ports, Amit said.

Of the two planned land-based terminals, state-run Petrobangla is working to develop a 7.5 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) facility near the under-construction Matarbari deep sea port in Cox's Bazar.

Petrobangla is evaluating bids to appoint a transaction adviser to begin the process of selecting a contractor for the country's first land-based LNG terminal.

A second land-based terminal with a similar 7.5 MTPA capacity will be developed at Matarbari in a later phase, the state minister said.

Alongside LNG imports, the government plans to increase domestic gas production by intensifying exploration and strengthening state-run Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company (BAPEX).

Under its short-, medium- and long-term plans to address power and gas shortages, the government aims to drill 300 new gas wells - 150 by 2030 and another 150 between 2031 and 2035, Amit said.

An international bidding round for 26 offshore blocks is also underway to accelerate offshore exploration, he added.

Despite the planned expansion, Bangladesh continues to face a significant gas shortage.

The prime minister assured businessmen at Monday's meeting that the government would raise overall gas supplies by Tuesday evening.

On Tuesday, LNG regasification returned to levels seen before a 21 July accident that forced one of the country's two operational FSRUs at Moheshkhali to shut down, according to Petrobangla.

The country had been regasifying LNG at near-maximum capacity before the 21 July incident. Petrobangla data show regasification reached around 993 mmcfd on 20 July, a day before the accident.

Bangladesh was regasifying around 990 mmcfd of LNG at noon on Tuesday, against total FSRU regasification capacity of 1.1 billion cubic feet per day, according to Petrobangla data.

Total natural gas supply stood at around 2.61 billion cubic feet per day, supported by higher regasified LNG volumes.

However, national gas demand remains around 4,000 mmcfd, leaving a shortfall of nearly 1.4 billion cubic feet per day. Petrobangla has been rationing gas supplies to industries, power plants and other consumers to manage the shortage.

Despite rising demand, Bangladesh has been unable to import larger volumes of LNG due to infrastructure constraints.

Disruptions in the Middle East have also constrained contractual LNG supplies, forcing Bangladesh to rely more heavily on spot purchases.

Since starting LNG imports in 2018, Bangladesh imported around 38.755 million tonnes of LNG in 625 cargoes through July 2026, according to official data from state-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd.​
 

Gas supply increases, industry gets priority

Staff Correspondent
Dhaka
Published: 16 Sep 2026, 08: 34

1789534632984.webp

A gas stove File photo

Gas supply in the country has increased after more than a month and a half. Following the prime minister’s announcement to increase gas supply to industries, supply began rising from Monday night and increased further yesterday, Tuesday.

Petrobangla officials said industrial consumers were being given the highest priority after the increase in supply. Most of the additional gas is going to the industrial sector.

Petrobangla oversees the import of liquefied natural gas (LNG), while its subsidiary, Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Limited (RPGCL), imports it.

Two officials responsible for LNG supply told Prothom Alo that supply was initially disrupted following a fire at a floating terminal. In addition, delays in LNG cargo arrivals due to the war in the Middle East delayed efforts to increase supply. Cargoes are now arriving regularly.

According to Petrobangla sources, although daily gas demand is 3.8 billion cubic feet, the situation has been managed by supplying 2.65 to 2.7 billion cubic feet. Of this, LNG has supplied up to 1.05 billion cubic feet.

At 10:00 pm on Monday, LNG supply was 980 million cubic feet. It increased to 990 million cubic feet on Tuesday. Total gas supply stood at 2.61 billion cubic feet, of which 1.62 billion cubic feet came from domestic gas fields.

Earlier, gas supply from the floating terminal in Maheshkhali operated by US company Excelerate was suspended following a fire on 21 July. Before that, daily supply stood at 2.64 billion cubic feet, with 990 million cubic feet coming from LNG.

Although LNG is now supplying the same amount, production from domestic gas fields has already fallen by 40 million cubic feet.

Petrobangla and RPGCL sources said plans had been made to bring in 10 LNG cargoes in September. Despite several rounds of tenders, all 10 cargoes could not be secured. Prices have also risen significantly.

Two officials responsible for LNG supply told Prothom Alo that supply was initially disrupted following a fire at a floating terminal. In addition, delays in LNG cargo arrivals due to the war in the Middle East delayed efforts to increase supply. Cargoes are now arriving regularly.

A total of nine cargoes have been confirmed for this month. Of these, two are from Gunvor USA under long-term contracts, two from Aramco under short-term contracts and five have been purchased from the spot market, they said.

RPGCL sources said two Aramco cargoes and one each from British Petroleum and Posco have already supplied LNG this month. After that, one Gunvor cargo is expected today, 16 September, followed by one Aramco cargo on 18 September, one TotalEnergies cargo on 23 September, another Aramco cargo on 25 September and one Gunvor cargo on 28 September.

This has created an opportunity to increase LNG supply. Meanwhile, the process of purchasing 11 LNG cargoes for October is under way. Eight cargoes for October have already been confirmed. A tender was invited Tuesday to purchase three more.

Syed Imtiaz Rajib, general manager of Fakir Knitwear Limited in the Kayempur area of Fatullah, Narayanganj, said, “The pressure should be 10 PSI, but we are getting 4 PSI. It has increased somewhat compared with before.”

Amzad Hossain, president of the Narayanganj Dyeing Owners Association, told Prothom Alo that the pressure required to run factories had still not been available as of Tuesday.

Load-shedding continues, but eases somewhat

Although plans were taken to increase electricity generation from coal amid the gas shortage, the generation could not be increased due to coal shortages and technical problems. As a result, load-shedding has continued across the country for a month.

At 1:00 am on Tuesday, load-shedding of more than 2,500 megawatts was required. During the daytime Tuesday, the highest load-shedding was close to 2,000 megawatts.

An initiative was taken to increase generation from oil-fired power plants to reduce load-shedding, but this has not been possible to a greater extent due to insufficient stocks of furnace oil. Generation from oil may be increased after 20 September.

At around midnight on Wednesday, one unit of the Adani power plant was shut down due to a technical failure. This further reduced generation, causing load-shedding to increase across the country. Supply from the plant’s second unit resumed at noon on Sunday. Since then, the plant has been supplying more than 1,400 megawatts during periods of peak demand.

Before the Adani power plant resumed operation, one unit of the Rampal power plant in Bagerhat was shut down at around 11:30 am on Sunday due to a technical problem. After one unit was shut down, the plant generated 610 megawatts Tuesday. It may take another two days for the plant to return to full production.

There are two coal-fired power plants in Patuakhali, built as joint ventures between China and Bangladesh. Each plant was built with a capacity of 1,320 megawatts.

One unit of the Payra power plant is currently shut down due to a technical problem, leaving it to generate 570 megawatts. There is sufficient coal at the plant. At another plant in the same district, generation exceeded 1,000 megawatts Tuesday after coal supplies increased.

Sources at the Bangladesh Power Development Board (PDB) and Power Grid Company said the highest amount of electricity can be generated from coal. However, the coal-fired power plants have been unable to generate at full capacity for a month. Up to 3,500 megawatts is being generated from fuel oil.

At 1:00 am on Tuesday, load-shedding of more than 2,500 megawatts was required. During the daytime Tuesday, the highest load-shedding was close to 2,000 megawatts. Earlier last month, load-shedding of more than 3,500 megawatts had been required. By comparison, load-shedding has therefore decreased.

[Narayanganj correspondent contributed information for this report]​
 

Solar equipment imports get major tax relief
Staff Correspondent . Dhaka 18 September, 2026, 00:00

1789706271399.webp


The government on Wednesday slashed the tax burden on imports of solar power equipment and components for plant or power system from 17 per cent to 1 per cent, aiming to accelerate renewable energy.

Finance ministry issued a gazette notification confirming the sweeping tax cuts.

Under the notification, the importer would get relief by exempting imports of components from customs duty above 1 per cent, as well as fully waiving regulatory duty, supplementary duty, VAT, advance tax, and advance income tax.

The concession would remain in force for 180 days from the date of the gazette notification.

Under the concession, the commercial importer could import equipment including steel and aluminum mounting structure, AC and DC generators including lithium storages, batteries, inverters, solar inverters, and other components.

Earlier, in the budget for the financial year 2026–27, a statutory regulatory order had exempted key solar power equipment from customs duty, regulatory duty, and supplementary duty, and advance tax.

However, that measure still left an overall tax burden of 17 per cent, comprising 15 per cent VAT and 2 per cent advance income tax.

The development reduced the total tax burden on these imports to a nominal 1 per cent.

This decision came against the backdrop of an ongoing global energy crisis and persistent domestic electricity shortages, which have intensified the demand for reliable alternative power sources, said the National Board of Revenue.

It stated that the tax relief would bolster solar power generation across the country while curbing dependence on fossil fuels.

In a departure from previous policies, the facility has also been extended—subject to specific conditions—to commercial importers of solar power equipment.

Previously, commercial importers were ineligible for these tax benefits, NBR added.​
 

Winning the sea, but losing the energy race
1789772436239.webp


Bangladesh is facing its worst gas shortage in a decade, with households, factories and power plants all struggling with inadequate supply. Domestic output has fallen to around 1,620 million cubic feet a day from a peak of nearly 2,800 million, leaving the country short by roughly 1,300 to 1,500 million cubic feet every single day. Imported liquefied natural gas has helped cover some of that gap, but rising prices and the ongoing war in the Middle East have made it much more expensive and harder to secure. Each time the gas shortage reaches this level of severity, offshore exploration in the Bay of Bengal naturally becomes subject of renewed public discussion. The catch is that this idea relies on a resource potential that is still largely unproven, since nobody knows for certain if the sea actually holds enough gas to make extraction worth the cost. On top of that, even if a promising discovery is made, developing an offshore field and getting that gas into the national system would still take years.

The irony is that the physical space to conduct this exploration is already secured and waiting. The country won a massive maritime zone of over 118,000 square kilometres after settling boundary disputes with India and Myanmar more than a decade ago. It has been 12 years since that historic legal victory, yet successive governments have treated the exploration of this vast underwater territory as a secondary concern. Instead of launching serious drilling campaigns, leaders have allowed the area to remain largely untouched while neighbouring nations actively extract energy resources from their adjacent waters. Myanmar, sharing the exact same maritime neighbourhood, has continued extracting gas from fields close to the boundary line throughout this period, drawing on geology that very likely extends into waters now legally belonging to Bangladesh. Meanwhile that same geological formation yields nothing on this side of the line.

The state gas corporation Petrobangla carries a large share of the blame for how little that maritime advantage has been used. Political appointees have occupied the top positions of the organisation for years instead of true professionals, which severely weakened the expertise and technical continuity needed to negotiate confidently with foreign companies. Bapex, the exploration arm that should have been pushing the process forward, has also struggled to turn its technical recommendations into a consistent exploration programme.

This lack of strategic continuity became particularly costly when ConocoPhillips identified a deep-water prospect that state experts estimated could contain around five trillion cubic feet of gas. Such a massive discovery would have been a complete game changer for the national energy grid. However, the extreme depth and distance made the extraction process incredibly expensive. The American company requested a revised pricing formula to make the project financially viable, suggesting a slight increase in the gas price. The government responded with a flat refusal and rigidly stuck to the old pricing structure rather than negotiating towards a middle ground. ConocoPhillips eventually walked away. Looking back, this decision stands as a massive failure of foresight. The issue was not simply whether the higher price sought by the company was acceptable. It was whether a way could have been found to keep negotiations alive over a resource that, developed on time, could have reduced import dependence and spared the country the present cry of shortage.

The instinct for rigid decision-making also showed up in the bidding rounds that followed. The offshore bidding round in 2024 ended in complete failure despite initial interest from several major international players including ExxonMobil. Eventually, the process had to be cancelled. A government committee later identified unfavourable pricing terms among the reasons for the poor response.

The current administration is now attempting to restart the effort with a new tender for 26 offshore blocks, split between 15 deep sea and 11 shallow water areas. Learning from that earlier embarrassment, the government has adjusted the production sharing contract terms to offer better financial incentives. Turkish Petroleum and China National Offshore Oil Corporation have already purchased tender documents, while several other firms have collected information packages. Buying paperwork and submitting a firm bid by the end of November remain two very different steps yet the early signs of interest offer a small measure of hope.

While adjusting the terms to attract foreign companies makes logical sense, the state must ensure the fundamental purpose of domestic exploration is not compromised in the process. If the actual cost of extracting gas from the deep sea ends up matching or exceeding the price of imported liquefied natural gas, the citizens will still end up paying high prices. The production sharing contracts therefore need to strike a balance between giving investors enough incentive and ensuring that Bangladesh receives a reasonable return. This necessary caution does not mean offshore exploration should be abandoned. On the contrary, finding new domestic sources of gas is one of the few realistic ways to reduce dependence on volatile international markets over the longer term. The real trouble is the timeline. Even if the current bidding process is a complete success, Petrobangla estimates that it could take roughly eight years to bring the gas to the national grid. Such a long delay creates a massive disconnect between immediate survival and long-term planning. The country is essentially looking for a distant lifeboat while the current ship has started taking on water.

At the same time, the existing engines of domestic energy are actively failing. This reveals severe operational inefficiencies within the national oil and gas corporation and its dedicated exploration arm. Notably, these two organisations are rarely seen as serious exploration companies, despite being the country's own institutions for exactly that purpose. The same underperformance runs through the education system where universities across the country produce graduates from relevant engineering and geology departments every year, yet their academic knowledge rarely translates into homegrown exploration initiatives. The complete absence of independent drilling campaigns led by the state shows that the educational pipeline is not feeding into practical execution. Offshore exploration may offer a significant new source of gas in the future, but building stronger domestic capacity is necessary to reduce the dependence that has brought the country to its present predicament.​
 

Why Bangladesh’s energy crisis keeps coming back

Khairul Hassan Jahin

Why does Bangladesh remain trapped in recurring gas and electricity shortages despite decades of investment in the energy sector? Economist and energy activist Anu Muhammad speaks to The Daily Star about the policy choices behind the crisis, the country’s growing dependence on imported energy, and why he believes domestic gas, stronger national institutions and renewable energy offer a different path.
 

Rooftop solar policy may fall short of expectations
Sabbir Ahmad 19 September, 2026, 00:00

1789774201373.webp


NURUL Amin worked for 31 years in the private sector and invested most of his savings on a six-storey building at Mirpur. When he applied for an electric connection in January, the clerk gave a condition tat he had not planned for: his roof size triggered a mandatory requirement to install solar panels before the meter could be energised. This requirement is a formal mandate. A revised Power Division circular issued in December 2025 makes net-metered rooftop solar compulsory for any building with at least 1,000 square feet of usable roof space applying for a connection, legally binding the owner to a 20 operational commitment.

Then Nurul Amin came across the government’s rooftop solar incentive policy. On paper, there seemed to be a silver lining. He could earn an attractive tariff of Tk 10.50 for every unit of surplus electricity his battery-backed system fed into the national grid. However, his optimism quickly faded on reading the fine print.

Under the new framework, this guaranteed revenue is only locked in until February 28, 2030. For a solar setup he is forced to install and keep running for two decades, his immediate question: what happens afterward? The question exposes the central weakness of Bangladesh’s new rooftop solar incentive, a timing mismatch between a long-lived mandated asset and a revenue guarantee lasting less than three years.

The Power Division’s notification, effective from September 1, is an important step. For eligible systems commissioned by February 28, 2027, surplus electricity supplied to the grid will receive that incentive. The government has benchmarked the generation cost of battery-backed rooftop solar at Tk 8.00 and added a 20 per cent profit margin and an 11.25 per cent premium to calculate the incentive price.


The next day, the data presented in the parliament estimated a purchase rate of Tk 10.15, relying instead on a Tk 6 to Tk 7 cost structure with a 40 per cent margin and a 5 per cent premium. Although both frameworks add up mathematically, they introduce conflicting financial baselines. Because a long-term energy asset demands a predictable 20-year lifecycle, lenders require absolute legislative clarity on which economic framework will ultimately govern the investment.

This creates a strange investment proposition — a system expected to operate for twenty years receives a guaranteed incentive for less than three. Because the ending of the proposed incentive is a fixed date, February 2030, rather than a duration from the project’s commissioning date, early 2027 investors face a compressed recovery window. A system energised this October earns the incentive for roughly forty-one months, whereas one commissioned on the final permitted day in February 2027 receives it for only 36. The offer shrinks with every month of due diligence, rewarding whoever moves fastest rather than whoever builds best. The policy’s central bankability problem is not the level of the tariff but this calendar-based expiry of the revenue support, leaving investors without any clarity on the long-term tariff framework after 2030.

That uncertainty matters because Bangladesh is simultaneously pushing rooftop solar through its broader national programme. The opportunity is substantial. Infrastructure Development Company Ltd estimates more than 3,600MWp of rooftop potential, requiring about Tk 16,295 crore of investment. The textile and garment sector alone accounts for about 2,815MWp. Against that potential, the installed base remains thin. A Centre for Policy Dialogue study counted 4,551 net-metered rooftop installations totalling 213.3MW. The country also has a cautionary precedent in its own off-grid programme, where nearly half of the sixty lakh solar home systems once installed are now reported to be non-functional.

For these investors, Tk 10.50 is not necessarily the main problem. The problem is whether the revenue can be predicted over the life of the asset. For a commercial or industrial consumer, the economics will therefore depend heavily on how much solar electricity is consumed behind the meter and how much is exported. The incentive needs to encourage both, particularly on the large industrial roofs where Bangladesh has the greatest potential. Recent policy discussions have already identified financing cost as a major barrier. The question here is narrower: even if affordable finance is made available, will a lender have a sufficiently predictable revenue stream against which to borrow?

Then there is the issue of payment security. The policy tasks state distribution companies tracking exports and transferring earnings to bank or mobile wallets. Yet, it does not set out payment guarantees, escrow protections, or late-payment interest mechanisms. The structural problem is that the same distribution company measures the export and releases the payment. It is both the buyer and the party that determines what it owes, and a prosumer who disputes the reading needs an independent route for resolution. While demanding these safeguards might seem excessive for a household solar setup, it becomes important if Bangladesh wants to inspire a decentralised army of rooftop producers rather than relying on a handful of large-scale projects.

Power grid risk is another unmitigated threat. When a local grid goes down or a utility feeder fails to accept power, the rooftop system stops exporting. When these restrictions stem from utility constraints rather than system failures, the individual investor should not have to absorb the financial hit. The policy must establish transparent curtailment rules and clear compensation for ‘deemed generation’.

Similarly, the battery-backed structure of the new incentive package needs more rigorous economic grounding. Batteries increase upfront capital expenditure and require replacement over a twenty-year project life. Yet, the policy reduces this complex lifecycle question to a single generation-cost benchmark of Tk 8. While that may be useful as a policy assumption, it does not fully capture replacement and life-cycle costs, especially without a mechanism to monetise the storage services these batteries can provide to the grid.

More importantly, a flat export tariff can mis-price the value of storage. Solar power is harvested under the midday sun, but Bangladesh’s power system breaks under evening peak loads. On August 11, the national demand peaked at 18,043MW at 9:00pm against the supply of 15,036MW, leaving a deficit of about 3,000MW at precisely the hour when rooftop solar is no longer generating. A battery that shifts clean energy into those critical hours provides a premium service to the grid, one that a blunt, uniform tariff fails to incentivise or reward.

Of course, funding avenues do exist. Bangladesh Bank’s green refinancing facilities support eligible projects at concessionary rates of up to 5 per cent for three to ten years, while Infrastructure Development Company Ltd offers targeted rooftop-solar financing. Yet, the mismatch extends far beyond loan tenure. Existing financing windows and dense documentation requirements remain extremely difficult for smaller or residential borrowers to navigate. Furthermore, a recent study by the Centr5e for Policy Dialogue on industrial rooftop solar underscores the fragility of these economics, demonstrating that investment readiness completely evaporates once commercial borrowing costs cross the 10.5 per cent threshold.

Eventually, energy financing cannot exist in a vacuum; it must match the project’s revenue profile. No bank will willingly issue a 10-year loan for a solar setup whose guaranteed returns expire in less than three. The central bank should, therefore, consider a dedicated, low-cost rooftop-solar credit package with longer tenors and credit guarantees across commercial lenders, creating a streamlined one-stop facility for citizens. But the financing product will only solve part of the problem unless the underlying revenue guarantee is also long enough to support it.

This does not mean the government must promise subsidies forever. A simple, two-pronged reform would suffice. First, the incentive from a fixed calendar date should be decoupled for, instead, a guarantee the tariff for a fixed 10–12 years from the actual commissioning date. Second, the post-2030 rules should be defined today by setting a predictable tariff floor tied to bulk electricity rates. A predictable lower rate is far more useful to a lender than an attractive rate that suddenly disappears.

True policy modernisation also requires enforceable utility payment deadlines, independent arbitration for meter disputes, and clear compensation for grid-enforced curtailment. If Bangladesh wishes to transition from heavy fuel reliance to decentralised solar security, it must stop treating battery storage as a passive commodity and start pricing it as the vital grid-stabilising service it truly is.

Bangladesh does not lack roofs; it lacks a sound investment framework that makes those roofs financially dependable. The new incentive package is a welcome beginning, but it must not devolve into another short-lived programme measured merely by the number of systems rushed online before a hard deadline. The real test of this policy is whether a building owner, a factory manager, and a banker can look at the same framework and confidently calculate what that rooftop solar system will be worth a decade from now.

People like Nurul Amin do not ask the state to subsidise their electricity forever. They simply ask for a baseline regulatory clarity. If the government forces them to buy into a 20-year asset, it owes them an answer to what happens when the clock runs out in February 2030.

Dr Sabbir Ahmad is a technology executive and chief executive officer of Silicon Array Ltd, with experience in digital connectivity, infrastructure and energy.​
 

LNG reliance deepens energy crisis, yet Bangladesh doubles down
Shahriar Azam . Dhaka 20 September, 2026, 05:53

1789862366242.webp


Bangladesh is living through an energy crisis largely of its own making, born of a decade-long push to meet its energy needs through heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels.

Billions have been spent on liquified natural gas since its import began in 2018 but the gas crisis is far from over. Households have never seen a shortage reach this far with literally no supply for weeks now.

Yet, nearly every fix now on the table, from emergency spot-market cargoes to new floating LNG terminals, offers ways that started the problem in the first place.

Bangladesh first turned to imported LNG to plug a widening gap between demand and dwindling output from domestic fields, brushing aside warnings that tying the national grid to a volatile global market would eventually expose the country to shocks well beyond its control.

Those warnings have since played out in full. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz amid the latest Middle East conflict choked off a critical import corridor, triggering fuel queues that stretched for kilometres at filling stations, leaving families to go without cooking gas and forcing industrial production lines to scale back.

Yet the response drawn up by the government remains, in essence, a repeat of the old playbook: more LNG purchases, more regasification terminals – this time at prices markedly higher than those Bangladesh paid during the tenure of the Awami League government, which was deposed from power in 2024 by a student-led mass uprising amid a deepening economic crisis.

‘Additional floating LNG terminals cannot provide a sustainable solution,’ said energy expert Badrul Imam, who has argued for years that Bangladesh must prioritise exploring and developing its own gas reserves rather than deepening its reliance on imports.

The scale of that reliance is stark. Domestic gas production, including output from state-run Petrobangla and international oil companies, has fallen to around 1,600 million cubic feet per day, down from roughly 2,700 mmcfd in 2016 – a decline of more than 40% even as demand has climbed.

Bangladesh currently has two floating storage and regasification units in Maheshkhali. The latest emergency began with the disruption at one of them on July 21, but officials and analysts say the vulnerability runs far deeper.

Scrambling to secure cargoes on a volatile spot market, the Cabinet Committee on Government Purchase on September 2 approved deals with BP Singapore Pte Ltd at $28.03 per million British thermal units and Aramco Trading Singapore at $27.54 per MMBtu – well above the $20-$21.50 range of earlier tenders that had gone unapproved.

Officials estimate that every $1 rise in the price of LNG per unit adds roughly Tk 41.33 crore to the government’s bill, or at least Tk 165 crore per cargo.

The annual LNG subsidy for 2026-27 has been burned in just the first two months of the fiscal year.

Rather than reverse course, the government has doubled down.

On July 29 it signed a 13-year supply agreement with US-based Gunvor USA LLC for 117 LNG cargoes, locking in long-term volumes but not, analysts caution, insulating the country from price swings or from the geopolitical risk that has already disrupted supply once.

A third FSRU has been approved for Moheshkhali’sKutubdia, with three more floating terminals planned by 2029 at Payra, Mongla and Hiron Point – an expansion that, critics say, entrenches the very dependency that caused the crisis rather than resolving it.

State minister for power, energy and mineral resources Aninda Islam Amit on September 7 said in the parliament, the government was planning to sign contracts for at least two new FSRUs this year with a possibility of a third in the Mongla region. Recruitment of a transaction adviser for the 1000 mmcfdMatarbari land-based LNG terminal was in process.

Amit said domestic gas production is depleting at a rate of 150 mmcfd per year.

The government is committed to supply around 2,800 mmcfd of gas from imported LNG through new infrastructures by 2030, while domestic gas production will be increased to 2320 mmcfd through digging 150 wells by this timeframe, the state minister told parliament.

However, as a welcome move to fast tract clean energy transition, the cabinet on September 7 approved a proposal to exempt the import of machinery and parts required for setting up renewable solar plants from various taxes and duties for six months.

‘The energy sector is falling back into a vicious cycle of capacity payments,’ said FarseemMannanMohammedy, an energy expert, adding that such charges pile up regardless of whether the underlying facility – a power plant, an FSRU, a coal plant or a solar project – is even generating power.

He also pointed to a persistent lack of transparency in how these agreements are struck.

The Power Development Board paid out more than Tk 44,000 crore in capacity payments in the fiscal year through June 2025, a figure projected to top Tk 48,000 crore this year; the FSRUs alone cost an estimated $454,000 a day in such charges.

For the proposed third FSRU in Maheshkhali’sKutubjom, China National Energy Engineering & Construction Co will charge $3,42,000 per day as station charge.

Installed generation capacity stands at 29,158 megawatts across 137 plants, yet fuel shortages mean less than half of that can be used, indicating unplanned development.

Renewable energy remains a fraction of the mix: 1,446 megawatts on-grid and 378 megawatts off-grid, according to the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority, far short of the 20% by 2030 target set out in the ruling party’s manifesto.

On the ground, the toll is mounting. More than 900 textile mills have shut down or scaled back operations, officials and industry groups say, while steel, paper and other manufacturers are running well below capacity, threatening exports and jobs.

Low gas pressure has disrupted household cooking across the country, pushing families toward costlier alternatives as LPG prices climb, while long queues at CNG refuelling stations have become a fixture of daily life for autorickshaw and ride-share drivers.

Government ministers have conceded there is no quick fix. Zahed Ur Rahman, the prime minister’s adviser on information and broadcasting, recently said resolving the shortage fully could take at least two years – a timeline echoed separately by the power, energy and mineral resources minister and the finance minister.

For now, Bangladesh remains caught between an old strategy that helped create the crisis and a new one that largely extends it.

Breaking that cycle, analysts say, will require sustained investment in domestic exploration, tighter fiscal discipline over costly import contracts, and a genuine push toward energy sources the country does not have to import at all.​
 

Fuel shock to ripple across economy

Experts say goods, services to get more expensive after Tk 20-a-litre rise; govt insists it had no choice

Md Asaduz Zaman , Sukanta Halder , and Shamima Rita

1790057340494.webp

A filling station employee dispenses octane to a car after the Tk 20 per litre price hike for all four major petroleum products came into effect yesterday. The pump has posted notices displaying the new rates to avoid confusion among customers. The photo was taken in the capital’s Paribagh area. PHOTO: PRABIR DAS

The government’s latest fuel price hike is set to ripple across the economy, threatening to rekindle inflation just as it had begun to ease, experts say.

Higher transport fares, freight charges, irrigation expenses and production costs are now expected to push up the prices of goods and services, adding to the burden on households and businesses already grappling with elevated expenses.

The Tk 20-a-litre increase, which took effect yesterday, pushed diesel, petrol, octane and kerosene to their highest-ever retail prices. This marks the third fuel price hike since the BNP government assumed office in mid-February.

Diesel, the country’s most widely used fuel and the backbone of transport, agriculture and industry, now costs Tk 135 per litre, up from Tk 115. Before the US-Israeli war on Iran began, diesel was selling for Tk 100 a litre.

The government has defended the decision, saying it had become unavoidable amid surging import costs, a growing subsidy burden and rising risks of cross-border fuel smuggling.

Speaking at a press conference at the Secretariat yesterday, Anindya Islam Amit, state minister for power, energy and mineral resources, said maintaining the previous prices was no longer financially sustainable.

According to the minister, diesel would now cost about Tk 205 per litre had Bangladesh fully implemented its automatic fuel-pricing mechanism, under which domestic fuel prices are adjusted in line with international market rates. Even after the increase, the government is still subsidising diesel by about Tk 70 per litre, down from roughly Tk 90 previously.

“There was no alternative before us. Otherwise, the government would neither want nor choose to take such an unpopular decision,” he said.

The move comes amid volatility in the global energy market, with Brent crude remaining above the $100-a-barrel mark for much of the past two weeks.

Economists say the decision may reduce pressure on the government’s fuel subsidy bill but argue that the relief is largely fiscal rather than economic, as the burden is effectively being transferred to commuters, farmers, businesses and households.

They warn that the increase could drive up food prices, raise operating costs for firms already struggling with high borrowing costs and further weaken a job market that has struggled to recover for years.

The impact on transport has been immediate.

Bus operators on the Dhaka-Khulna route and other southern routes have already decided to raise fares by Tk 50 per passenger, according to transport owners.

Some operators imposed even steeper hikes. Islam Paribahan has raised fares by as much as Tk 100, said Md Hamid, one of its counter managers, taking the Dhaka-Thakurgaon fare to Tk 700. On some long-distance routes, passengers reported paying up to Tk 200 more.

The speed with which fares rose has heightened concerns that higher fuel costs will quickly spread through the broader economy via increased transport and freight expenses.

The Bangladesh Inland Container Depots Association (BICDA), for instance, has raised six service charges related to handling import, export and empty containers by 9.85 percent.

“The decision was taken to adjust the additional fuel cost,” said Md Ruhul Amin Sikder, BICDA secretary-general, following a meeting of association members yesterday morning.

The fuel price hike comes at a particularly sensitive time for the economy.

The government has recently announced a revised pay scale for public sector employees, but millions of workers in the private and informal sectors are unlikely to receive comparable wage adjustments. Real incomes are already under pressure. The wage rate index slowed to 8.05 percent in August from 8.22 percent in July, remaining below the inflation rate.

Nazneen Ahmed, executive director of the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), said higher fuel prices would have economy-wide consequences, affecting everything from agricultural production and transportation to industrial operations.

“Think about how much the cost of operating a bus will increase from one end of the city to the other and the impact that will have on fares.”

Evidence of that was already visible on Dhaka roads yesterday.

Passengers said Meghla Transport buses operating between Gulistan and Kalabagan via Shahbagh, as well as Rajanigandha buses on the Chittagong Road-Mohammadpur route, were charging an additional Tk 5. Ride-sharing drivers were also demanding higher fares.

Some commuters also reported fewer buses on the roads.

Moni Begum, who works at BIRDEM Hospital, was waiting in Shahbagh for a bus to Jatrabari. She said she usually caught one soon after office hours, but few were running. “It was the same when I came to work in the morning.”

CPD chief Nazneen Ahmed argued that a more gradual adjustment could have achieved the government’s objective without generating such a sharp economic shock. “Inflation had slowed over the past two months, but this will create a new kind of pressure.”

Nazneen also believes diesel and kerosene prices should have been left unchanged because they have a disproportionate impact on lower-income households, public transportation and industries.

The timing of the fuel adjustment alongside the implementation of the new pay scale, she warned, could fan the flames of inflation.

“…because two things are happening simultaneously, inflationary expectations will increase and push prices higher.”

Deen Islam, an economics professor at Dhaka University, said the impact would extend well beyond transport costs. “The cost of getting loans and marketing will raise the prices of goods and services in one go.”

He suspects that Bangladesh may not have been adequately prepared for rapidly changing geopolitical realities and that the timing of such a policy intervention therefore required careful consideration.

In his view, policymakers face a difficult trade-off between maintaining subsidies and safeguarding fiscal stability. While higher prices create immediate economic pain, sustained subsidies merely defer the adjustment while adding longer-term fiscal risks.

“There is no optimal policy here,” Deen said.

Bangladesh is not alone in confronting this dilemma.

Several import-dependent economies in the region have faced similar pressures. Pakistan, which relies heavily on oil imports from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates through the Strait of Hormuz, raised diesel prices by about 20 percent in March.

The Energy and Mineral Resources Division maintains that fuel prices in neighbouring and several other Asian countries remain significantly higher than those in Bangladesh.

Anu Muhammad, former professor of economics at Jahangirnagar University, argued that the government could have cut the taxes and fees it collects on fuel rather than, in his words, “putting the burden on the entire economy”.

Tight revenue collection may explain why the authorities were “choosing the easy means”, he said. “Judging by the government’s approach, it seems to be trying to become unpopular very quickly.”

Beyond the policy debate, the effects are already being felt by consumers and workers.

Shaheen Al Mamun, a grocer in Dhaka’s West Kafrul area, said customers’ purchasing power had been declining steadily over the past two to three years. “Now, with fuel prices rising by such a large amount all at once, people’s suffering will only increase.”

Abdul Mannan, who has been pulling a rickshaw in Dhaka for 16 years, said he was uncertain whether he would be able to continue sending money home every week if essential goods became more expensive.

Saidul Islam, a rice farmer in Habiganj, estimated that the fuel hike would add around Tk 200 per katha to his cultivation costs. Expenses related to operating power tillers are expected to increase, while labour costs are likely to follow.

Mohammad Lutfor Rahman, an economics professor at Jahangirnagar University, said production costs are about to rise across almost all sectors.

Rising agricultural costs would affect food prices and disproportionately hurt daily-wage earners and private-sector workers whose incomes are unlikely to keep pace, he said.

“We may move towards stagflation, which means high inflation, declining purchasing power, rising inequality, and an increase in joblessness,” he said. With the job market stagnant and industrialisation unlikely to pick up, “the situation ahead may be challenging for Bangladesh”.

Business leaders said they were not surprised by the direction of the move but questioned its scale and timing.

“We knew the government would eventually raise prices, but the timing and magnitude of the increase are concerning,” said Taskeen Ahmed, president of the Dhaka Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

He said businesses were already struggling with a prolonged energy crisis and that the fresh fuel price hike would place additional strain on production, logistics and household spending.

Taskeen urged all stakeholders to use fuel more efficiently and adopt austerity measures.​
 

Higher fuel prices to push up costs of production

Business leaders say

Jagaran Chakma

1790058040933.webp

Star Online Graphics

The latest fuel price hike will raise production, transport and energy costs across Bangladesh, putting further pressure on businesses, exporters and consumers already facing high inflation and weak demand, business leaders said.

The government yesterday raised the prices of diesel, octane, petrol and kerosene by Tk 20 a litre. The government cited sharply higher international fuel prices and freight costs amid the ongoing Middle East conflict.

The increase comes as businesses are already dealing with high interest rates, rising logistics costs, energy shortages and weak demand.

“The fuel price hike will push those costs up further and hurt our export competitiveness,” said Shams Mahmud, managing director of Shasha Denims Ltd.

For export-oriented industries, higher fuel prices will add to production costs, particularly for factories that rely on diesel generators during power or gas shortages.

“Energy security has still not been resolved. We are having to use diesel generators, which adds another layer of cost,” Shams said.

He said the impact would also be felt in agriculture, where diesel is widely used for irrigation and transportation, eventually pushing up food production and transport costs.

Anwar-ul Alam Chowdhury Parvez, president of the Bangladesh Chamber of Industries, said the increase would raise costs across agriculture, manufacturing and transport.

“Farmers’ costs will rise, which will increase food production costs. Industries will also face higher operating costs, while their capacity to produce and employ people will come under further pressure,” he said.

The higher fuel prices are also expected to add to inflationary pressure as the cost of transporting raw materials, imported goods, agricultural products and export shipments rises.

Parvez said the government should have consulted businesses before announcing such a sharp increase and should have raised prices gradually.

Taskeen Ahmed, president of the Dhaka Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said the private sector was frustrated by the sudden increase.

“We knew the government would eventually raise prices, but the timing and magnitude of the increase are concerning,” he said.

The knitwear sector is particularly exposed because factories often rely on generators during load-shedding. Mohammad Hatem, president of the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association, said the increase would raise both factory and transportation costs.

Factories would face higher costs for transporting fabrics, accessories, imported inputs and export shipments, he said.

“Industries are already going through a difficult period and facing various kinds of crises. At this point, it is not possible for the industry to absorb this additional burden,” Mohammad said.

Shams said higher transport and living costs would also reduce consumers’ disposable income and weaken domestic demand.

“When people have less disposable income, they spend less. That means buying and selling in the market will decline, and the internal economy will also take a hit,” he said.

He also warned that continued energy shortages could create industrial safety risks and raise concerns among international buyers about Bangladesh’s compliance standards.

Shams said the fuel price increase may also be influenced by the government’s efforts to reduce energy subsidies under its IMF programme.

The challenge, he said, is to implement such reforms without further undermining business competitiveness, consumer purchasing power and economic activity.​
 

Fuel price hike: Who will bear the burden

Selim Raihan


1790134455697.webp

Selim Raihan File photo

The recent increase in fuel oil prices will not remain confined to filling stations. Its impact will gradually spread across almost all sectors of the economy. Inflation has been high for several years. The purchasing power of common people is under pressure, while private investment remains weak. It is in precisely such a situation that fuel oil prices have been increased. Therefore, the concern is not merely the higher price of fuel; rather, the bigger question is how much pressure its indirect effects will put on the overall price level through the transport, food, agriculture, industry and services sectors. More importantly, there appears to be no clear government strategy to deal with this new inflationary pressure.

Diesel is the most important fuel in Bangladesh’s economy. It is used at various stages of transport, agriculture, industry and power generation. Therefore, when diesel prices rise, the cost of transporting goods increases first. The cost of operating buses and trucks rises, so does the cost of irrigation, as well as the cost of running generators and various types of machinery. Businesses generally do not bear all of these additional costs themselves. Over time, a large portion of them is passed on to consumers through higher product prices.


The risk is even greater in the case of food inflation. Transport, irrigation and supply costs are involved at almost every stage, from agricultural production to marketing. As a result, when fuel prices rise, pressure is created on several sources of costs at the same time. If traders, transport owners and workers believe that prices may rise further in the future, the problem could become more complicated. They then start adjusting product prices and wages in advance. This increases the risk of inflation becoming prolonged, making it more difficult to control later.

Its social impact is equally important. Relatively wealthy families may directly use more fuel, but low-income families often face greater losses indirectly. This is because a large share of their income is spent on food, transport and essential goods. A slight increase in bus fares, a rise in the prices of rice or vegetables, or higher cooking costs can create significant pressure on their monthly budgets. Low-income working people in cities, farming families dependent on diesel-powered irrigation systems and workers in the informal sector are at the greatest risk. It is seen that the incomes of the vast majority of these people do not increase at the same rate as inflation. As a result, the fuel price hike ultimately reduces the real income of these groups of people.

It is also true that if oil prices rise significantly in the international market, the government cannot continue providing subsidies indefinitely or completely shield consumers from this pressure. Large subsidies put pressure on the government’s financial situation. The liabilities of Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation increase, while the scope for spending on important sectors such as health, education, social protection and infrastructure may decrease. Therefore, price adjustment may be necessary.

But the issue should not be reduced to only two alternatives—either providing subsidies or raising prices. The inefficiencies within the energy sector also need to be discussed with equal importance. The sector faces institutional weaknesses, inefficiencies in procurement and distribution systems, limited transparency, and pressure from various types of taxes and duties on fuel. Yet when prices are increased, these issues receive comparatively less discussion. If retail prices are regularly increased without efforts to reduce the sector’s own costs and inefficiencies, the burden of those inefficiencies is effectively passed on to consumers.

The issue of taxes on fuel oil also needs to be reconsidered. If international prices rise while the country continues to maintain a high tax burden, consumers face a double pressure. The government certainly needs revenue. The question is how rational the current tax structure on fuel is when the country has been experiencing high inflation for several consecutive years. This is particularly important for products such as diesel, whose prices are linked to the costs of almost all types of goods and services. In this situation, tax policy cannot be considered solely from the perspective of revenue collection; its overall economic impact must also be taken into account.

The timing of this price increase is also not favourable for the economy. On the one hand, borrowing costs are high and business financing is difficult; on the other hand, domestic demand is also weak. In such a situation, higher fuel and transport costs will create new pressure on businesses’ profits. Large businesses may be able to cope to some extent, but small and medium-sized enterprises have less capacity to do so. Many businesses may postpone investment, reduce production or delay plans to create new jobs. Export-oriented businesses are also not free from its impact. If fuel oil prices rise, transport and production costs within the country will increase, which could put pressure on their competitiveness.

Therefore, the policy response should not be limited to raising prices. First, a transparent and credible method of fuel pricing is needed. The goal is to distinguish temporary price increases in the international market from permanent cost pressures within the country. Second, the structure of taxes and duties on fuel needs to be reviewed. Third, there needs to be an open review of where inefficiencies exist in the operations, procurement methods and distribution system of Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation.

At the same time, the nature of support also needs to change. Instead of keeping fuel cheap indiscriminately for everyone, targeted support for low-income families, agriculture and essential public transport could be relatively more effective. This would reduce pressure on government expenditure while also providing some protection to the most vulnerable groups.

Ultimately, fuel price adjustment is not merely a matter of calculation; it is also a question of distribution. It may be necessary to reduce some of the government’s financial pressure, but it is equally important to consider who bears the cost of reducing that pressure. Without institutional reforms, a review of the tax structure and measures to protect vulnerable groups, simply pursuing price increases may make the government’s calculations somewhat easier. But the cost may have to be paid in many ways, such as higher inflation, reduced purchasing power, greater inequality and, above all, weaker economic growth.

*Selim Raihan is a professor at the Department of Economics at the University of Dhaka and Executive Director of the research organisation South Asian Network on Economic Modeling (SANEM).​
 

Bangladesh’s real choice is diversification
Simon Mohsin 24 September, 2026, 00:00


1790224207766.webp


A US sanction against a Russian bank. A veto at the UN Security Council over Iran. A tanker rerouted away from the Strait of Hormuz. These sound like stories about Washington, Moscow, Tehran or Beijing, distant disputes with little bearing on daily life in Dhaka. Yet within days, the same chain of events shows up as higher fuel prices at the pump, LNG shortages that idle factories, costlier electricity, delayed shipments and mounting pressure on the country’s foreign-exchange reserves. The gap between geopolitical headline and household reality has never been shorter and Bangladesh needs to start treating it that way.

What looks like a sanctions story is, for Bangladesh, actually an energy story! The new US measures against Russia’s VTB Bank over its alleged role in helping Iran evade sanctions show that financial institutions connected to sanctioned economies can themselves become targets, not just the sanctioned states. More consequential still is new US legislation authorising tariffs of up to 100 per cent on major purchasers of Russian oil and gas. Bangladesh is not a major purchaser of Russian energy and is not the direct target of either measure. But that is precisely the point: energy, banking, shipping and trade are now so interconnected that a country can be affected by a crisis it had no part in creating.

The first transmission mechanism is oil. Russia remains one of the world’s largest energy producers, and Middle Eastern suppliers remain central to Asian energy security. When sanctions restrict Russian barrels or instability threatens Gulf shipping lanes, the result is less certainty in the market, and less certainty translates quickly into higher risk premiums and higher prices. For Bangladesh, what matters is not simply the headline price of a barrel of crude on international markets. It is the total cost of actually getting that barrel, physically and financially, into Bangladeshi ports, refineries and power plants.

The second, and arguably more dangerous, transmission mechanism is LNG. As domestic gas production has declined, Bangladesh has grown steadily more dependent on imported liquefied natural gas to keep its power plants and factories running. That dependence means an international LNG shock does not stay international for long; it becomes a domestic industrial shock within weeks. Asian LNG prices climbed towards $30 per million British thermal units amid recent Gulf disruptions, and Bangladesh has already experienced gas shortages tied to terminal shutdowns compounding the wider crisis. LNG availability, spot prices, long-term contracts, terminal capacity, shipping schedules and foreign-exchange reserves are not five separate problems. They are one problem wearing five different faces.

The Strait of Hormuz sharpens this point further. Roughly a fifth of Bangladesh’s imported fuel passes through that single waterway, sourced largely from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. A willing supplier is not the same thing as a secure delivery. Even if Riyadh and Abu Dhabi remain entirely happy to sell to Bangladesh, disruption along the route can delay cargoes and inflate freight and insurance costs regardless of supplier goodwill. This is worth stating plainly, because Bangladeshi energy planning has tended to focus on the former and neglect the latter: supplier diversification is not the same thing as route diversification, and a strategy that achieves only the first has solved only half the problem.

India offers a useful case study here, not as a political model to imitate, but as a preview of the dilemma facing any large energy importer. Russian crude has come to account for more than 40 per cent of India’s oil supply, offering real economic advantages. But the new US legislation now forces New Delhi to weigh those advantages against potential tariff exposure, while replacing that volume of oil suddenly would raise costs even where alternatives technically exist. India’s response, publicly defending its energy-security interests while carefully assessing the new US measures rather than reacting reflexively, illustrates a broader principle: energy procurement decisions must now be evaluated on both price and geopolitical risk simultaneously.

Bangladesh’s circumstances, however, are not India’s. Dhaka lacks India’s refining capacity, its domestic market size and its purchasing leverage. Copying India’s playbook would be a mistake. What Bangladesh needs instead is resilience calibrated to its own scale, diversified suppliers, diversified shipping routes, adequate strategic reserves, more flexible contracts, a broader LNG supplier base and a larger share of domestically generated renewable power.

The stakes become concrete once energy security is translated into industrial terms. A garment factory does not care whether a gas shortage originated in a sanctions dispute in Washington or a shipping disruption near Hormuz. It cares whether the electricity stays on, whether gas pressure is sufficient and whether diesel remains affordable enough to keep production running. With garments generating more than four-fifths of Bangladesh’s export earnings and employing roughly four million workers, an energy crisis at home is, in practice, an export crisis waiting to happen. Recent factory surveys showing widespread stoppages and cancelled orders amid energy shortages are an early warning, not an isolated event.

A second, quieter transmission channel is foreign exchange. Bangladesh pays for imported fuel almost entirely in dollars. When global prices rise, the effect cascades — a larger import bill increases dollar demand, which pressures already-strained reserves, which in turn makes it harder to finance the next round of energy imports. Energy policy and exchange-rate management, in other words, cannot be planned as separate exercises. They are the same exercise viewed from different ministries.

This is where strategic reserves matter more than they are usually given credit for. The right question is not simply how much fuel Bangladesh consumes in a year. It is how many days Bangladesh could keep functioning if a major supply route were suddenly disrupted. A country with substantial reserves buys itself time to negotiate during a crisis. A country without them is forced to buy at spot prices precisely when spot prices are at their worst. Bangladesh’s recent moves to expand fuel stockpiles towards a 90-day reserve target are a step in the right direction, but reserves should be understood as a macroeconomic shock absorber, not merely an emergency stockpile.

Renewable energy deserves a place in this argument too, not primarily as climate policy, but as geopolitical insurance. Every unit of domestic solar or wind power that displaces imported fuel is a unit of international price volatility, shipping risk and foreign-exchange exposure that Bangladesh no longer has to carry. That reframing matters, because it makes the case for renewables to finance ministries and energy planners, not only to environmental advocates.

All of this points towards a more sophisticated procurement philosophy: risk-adjusted energy cost. The cheapest contract on paper is not necessarily the cheapest energy strategy in practice. A slightly costlier but reliable supply, accounting for route security, insurance, supplier concentration, sanctions exposure and contract flexibility, can be far less expensive than a nominally cheap cargo that simply fails to arrive during a crisis.

From this, five priorities follow: diversify suppliers, diversify shipping routes and storage, expand strategic reserves, grow domestic renewable and industrial self-generation capacity, and build a standing national energy-risk monitoring mechanism linking the energy, finance, commerce and foreign ministries with Bangladesh Bank, ports and major exporters. That last point deserves emphasis, because a single geopolitical event — a sanctions announcement, a shipping disruption or a regional conflict — can simultaneously touch every one of these institutions, yet Bangladesh currently has no mechanism that treats them as one interconnected problem rather than several unrelated ones.

The world is entering an era in which geopolitical conflicts increasingly travel along chains — energy, into finance, into shipping, into manufacturing, into trade. Bangladesh cannot control the decisions made in Washington, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing or New Delhi. What it can control is how much of the resulting shock it must absorb.

Bangladesh cannot prevent the next geopolitical energy shock. But it can decide how much of that shock it is willing to import.

Simon Mohsin is a political and international affairs analyst and a research fellow at Bangladesh Neeti Gobeshona Kendra.​
 

Attachments

  • 1790224135514.webp
    1790224135514.webp
    100.7 KB · Views: 12

SPM to be operated by Indonesian company


1790316359215.webp


CHATTOGRAM: Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) is going to appoint operations and maintenance (O&M) contractor for the operation of the Single Point Mooring (SPM) with double pipeline after getting approval from the cabinet committee.

BPC will appoint PT Pertamina Trans Kontinental of Indonesia as the O&M contractor for the SPM at a cost of Tk 19.46 billion.

The government has approved the appointment at the 46th meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Government Purchase chaired by Finance Minister Amir Khosru Mahmud Chowdhury on Wednesday. The proposal was placed by the Energy and Mineral Resources Division, while BPC will implement the contract.

The BPC has constituted a separate company for maintenance and operation of petroleum pipelines. It has already built four pipeline projects, including SPM with double pipeline from Moheshkhali to Eastern Refinery Limited (ERL), India-Bangladesh Friendship Pipeline, Chattogram-Dhaka Pipeline, Pitalganj-Kurmitola Pipeline.

Talking to The Financial Express, Managing Director of ERL Sharif Hasant said, "The SPM project had already been completed last year. We have already started the procedures for operating the project." It may be mentioned that the SPM project was undertaken by the BPC to transport imported raw petroleum to state-owned ERL at Patenga in Chattogram in order to reduce the transportation cost of petroleum fuel and also ensure prompt direct unloading from the deep sea vessels.

The SPM project was taken up in 2012 and after completing the official process, the government awarded the contract of the project to the Chinese company China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPP). The BPC signed a contract with the CPP on December 7, 2016 to implement the 'SPM with Double Pipeline'.​
 

We need reliable buyers to build more solar power

Md. Sajid Hasan

1790318307885.webp

Bangladesh’s solar ambitions will depend not only on generating power but also on finding reliable buyers. FILE PHOTO: REUTERS

A factory that wants solar electricity and a landowner who can host a solar plant may be hundreds of kilometres apart, and Bangladesh’s electricity network should make that distance manageable. For a developer, however, finding both is only the beginning. The project still needs permission and capacity to move power between them, at a cost the buyer will accept.

This is the test facing Bangladesh’s merchant-power reform. The Policy for Enhancement of Private Participation in the Renewable Energy-based Power Generation, 2025 allows renewable generators to sell directly to large consumers through transmission and distribution networks. But meeting the country’s target of supplying 20 percent of electricity demand from renewables by 2030 requires projects that can secure finance. Investors need a credible route from a proposed solar site to a paying customer before they commit substantial development spending. At the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission’s August 23 hearing, industry representatives and energy experts opposed a proposed cross-subsidy surcharge on merchant-power customers. Distribution utilities sought compensation for revenue they could lose as large customers moved to private suppliers. How much freedom will the new market offer if network charges erode the savings that attract buyers?

Outside industrial centres, inexpensive land, and a nearby substation can look promising. But the substation’s location reveals little about how much generation the network can accommodate. Under the policy, access depends on available network capacity, and the relevant utility’s power-system study determines how much a plant can supply. A study might show that the plant needs a longer connection, network reinforcement, or a smaller capacity, thus changing the economics enough to make the land unattractive. Limited electricity demand near the site need not rule it out: distant customers can provide a market if the network can carry the power.

The developer must then establish how dependable those customers will be. The policy permits a distribution utility to buy up to 20 percent of a plant’s declared monthly energy output through a power purchase agreement. This is conditional on the utility’s demand and capacity; it creates no automatic obligation to absorb unsold electricity. Payment security is required for utility contracts, but it cannot create demand. A lender will therefore look beyond annual output. A factory may need less electricity when solar generation is strongest. It may reduce production, pay late, or close. Several customers can spread that exposure, although negotiating with them adds work. Interest in cleaner energy must translate into contracts specifying volumes, payment obligations, and what happens when circumstances change.

Market organisation can make these risks harder to manage. Developers negotiate with buyers while still establishing the network costs and connection conditions that determine the offer. Buyers need a credible delivered price; lenders need contracts they can evaluate. Resolving these uncertainties alone can delay investment.

Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) could help organise the buying side. Working with distribution utilities, it could invite large consumers to register how much renewable electricity they need and when, then connect suitable buyers with developers. Participation should be voluntary, with parties responsible for their contracts. A further policy option would let BPDB combine demand from committed customers, purchase agreed volumes from solar plants, and resell the electricity to them. This could help larger plants secure finance when no single factory can absorb their output. The programme should require verified demand, competitive procurement, and limits on BPDB’s financial obligations. Purchases beyond the merchant policy’s 20 percent provision would need an explicit legal and regulatory basis.

This would be useful only if BPDB’s payments were dependable. The International Energy Agency identifies financially credible intermediaries as a way to reduce renewable projects’ revenue risks. Payment security and rules for customer withdrawal and interrupted delivery would be essential. With those conditions in place, coordinated purchasing could shorten negotiations and help more investment reach solar projects at scale.

These arrangements would also need reliable grid information. Power grid and distribution utilities should publish a regularly updated, indicative hosting capacity map showing how much additional renewable generation their networks can accept. It should distinguish available capacity from capacity dependent on upgrades and explain its assumptions. Detailed studies would remain necessary; developers would know where they were worth paying for.

A developer dealing with the power grid, BPDB, rural electrification system, or NESCO should encounter common application requirements and published response times. Bangladesh already has a national net-metering portal through which applicants select their utility and track progress. Merchant projects need more extensive studies and contracts, but the portal offers a precedent for coordinating applications. A common portal would need clear responsibilities. Applicants should know which organisation must answer next and when. Preliminary advice should identify connection constraints early.

Network charges deserve the same clarity. Utilities incur costs in delivering electricity, and protecting consumers who cannot switch suppliers is a legitimate concern. Charges to recover lost revenue or support other consumers should be transparently calculated and assessed against their effect on renewable investment. Buyers need to understand the total delivered cost, including losses and backup supply, and how it may change.

Sylhet’s tea estates illustrate why these details matter. The policy provides for facilitating projects on private tea estates. Using suitable unused land still requires lawful permission, a grid connection, and buyers for any electricity intended for sale outside the estate. Clear renewable energy permissions could help owners and developers assess sites while protecting cultivation, workers’ interests, and the underlying lease.

Bangladesh should make these questions answerable before developers incur substantial costs. A defined BPDB role in organising demand, alongside clearer grid access and charges, could improve access to finance.

Md. Sajid Hasan is Energy Intelligence Associate at Lontana Consulting and intern at King’s College London.​
 

LNG unloading resumes, pressure normalises: Amit


1790381058584.webp


State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Aninda Islam Amit on Friday said the gas pressure had become normal by this afternoon, as unloading of liquefied natural gas (LNG) resumed at 7:18am.

“LNG cargoes have resumed gas transfer to the two floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) in the Bay of Bengal after temporary disruption on Thursday due to adverse weather,” he said, replying to a question.

After a meeting of the District Hospital Health Management Committee at Jashore Circuit House, the state minister also said that the gas supply is expected to help normalise the gas pressure soon.

Highlighting the ongoing development activities in the health sector in Jashore, he said residents of Jashore would be provided with full-fledged coronary care unit (CCU) services within the stipulated timeframe.

He said the government is working to ensure exclusive healthcare services, including for heart diseases, so that patients are not forced to travel to Dhaka or other districts for treatment.

The state minister said the government would also work to provide advanced healthcare services in remote and disadvantaged areas within the next few months.

Deputy Commissioner Mohammad Ashek Hasan chaired the meeting, while reserved seat lawmaker Sabira Nazmul, General Hospital Superintendent Dr Md Hossain Shafayat, Civil Surgeon Dr Md Masud Rana and senior officials concerned attended.

The state minister also said the government would take initiatives to readjust fuel prices after declining energy prices in the global market.

“If global energy prices remain stable or come down, we will try to readjust fuel prices in the country as soon as possible to provide relief to people,” he said.​
 

Is profit-sharing enough to revive Phulbari?


1790465656129.webp


Nearly two decades after protests halted the Phulbari coal mine, the government has now seized on the long-stalled project as a possible remedy for the country's worsening fuel crunch. The package on the table relies on an open pit extraction method and a profit-sharing model with local landowners to overcome the resistance that stalled the project. Under the proposal, landowners would lease out their land in return for regular payments and a share of the mine's profits. They would also reclaim their plots when the lease period ends and have access to jobs in and around the mine while their communities would gain new housing, piped water and an uninterrupted supply of electricity. This marks a departure from the earlier approach under which affected people were largely expected to accept compensation for losing their land and little else. The government appears to have learned that compensation and rehabilitation alone are unlikely buy consent and has adopted a framing calculated to blunt both local anger and international criticism. Nor is it difficult to discern the motivation of the government. Phulbari is estimated to contain 572 million tonnes of coal, of which about 475 million tonnes is considered mineable and its development could reduce the country's dependence on imported coal at a time when imported energy has grown costlier and less certain.

Even as the promise of financial gain and infrastructure development sounds appealing, the choice of open-pit extraction carries risks that the new package does little to address. Open-pit mining does not simply borrow land for a few decades and hand it back in the same condition. It requires the removal of the earth above the coal seam, along with the farms, homes and other structures standing on it. Land returned decades later would be handed back as a void, utterly unrecognisable to the landowners who once farmed it. More significantly, the mine would radically alter the lives of the people living above the coal reserve. Families would be forced to leave places where they have lived and farmed for generations, as villages, markets, schools and ponds that define their world are swept away. Meanwhile, the water table on which the entire agricultural region depends would sink as excavation moves further underground. The proposed mine site sits on some of the most fertile farmland in the northwest, land that feeds a large part of the country, and open-pit mining would do away with it for good.

The proposed profit-sharing arrangement raises a further set of questions about who the beneficiaries will be and how those benefits will be calculated. Share of the profits is undoubtedly attractive, but calculating the actual net profit of a massive mining operation involves numerous variables and accounting methods that can easily be manipulated to reduce the payout to local landowners.

It is also worth remembering that this is not the first time Phulbari has been presented as the answer to the nation's energy question. Asia Energy, the local arm of the British company GCM Resources, completed a feasibility study and submitted a development scheme long ago, but its plan collapsed in the face of fierce local resistance, most notably the protests of 2006 in which lives were lost. A deal that could not win the people's trust then cannot expect it now merely because the profit-sharing language has grown more generous. Policymakers must recognise that any attempt to bypass genuine ecological safeguards and public accountability will only invite renewed social conflict.​
 

Fuel price adjustment & wider economic interests

1790551319223.webp

Filling stations start to sell fuel at newly hiked prices on Monday — bdnews24.com Photo

Bangladesh government’s decision to raise retail prices of fuel oil including diesel, petrol, octane and kerosene—by Tk 20 per litre on September 21, 2026, has once again highlighted the country’s challenging energy economic realities. Bangladesh remains fully import dependent for fuel oil. It is compelled to import most of its fuel oil in refined form due to its limited domestic refining capacity (Eastern Refinery can refine approximately 1.2 million tonnes of imported crude petroleum annually). Currently, Bangladesh imports approximately 7 million tonnes of crude and refined petroleum (including diesel, octane, jet fuel, furnace oil, lubricant and others) annually. Annual spending on petroleum imports fluctuates heavily based on global market prices. During last fiscal year Bangladesh spent approximately 10.6 billion US dollars on fuel imports. With the country’s primary energy supply heavily dependent on imports, the government has limited immediate alternatives to ensure an uninterrupted supply of fuel oil.

The abrupt fuel price hike has triggered a domino effect across the economy, multiplying the hardships faced by ordinary people. A rise in fuel prices never remains confined to petrol stations; it drives up costs across transport, agriculture, industry and services. This, in turn, fuels inflation, reduces purchasing power and weakens the competitiveness of exporters. Higher transport fares and rising prices of everyday essentials not only increase people’s financial burden on citizens but also contribute to widespread frustration.

Consequently, the government has raised bus fares by Tk 0.17 per kilometre, while long-distance bus fares have already increased by Tk 50–100. Local buses on the Dhaka–Chattogram route are charging an additional Tk 5–10. Truck freight rates have surged by Tk 2,000–8,000. Furthermore, private container depot operators have imposed a 9.85 per cent fuel surcharge on container handling.

The government has announced fare increases for buses, minibuses and launch services, but not for air-conditioned buses, goods-carrying trucks or covered vans. This has left considerable room for operators to impose their own charges. Some are reportedly charging an additional Tk 50 to Tk 200 for each trip, while truck and covered-van operators are imposing even higher increases. Truck owners, for example, have reportedly been charging an additional Tk 4,000–6,000 on some routes.

The increase in fuel prices is also affecting the handling of import-export containers, as the machinery and vehicles used at private inland container depots are largely diesel-powered.

The higher price of diesel will be an additional burden on farmers who are already struggling with a fertiliser shortage. As reported, around 15-24 per cent of total diesel consumed in Bangladesh (about 0.97- 1.25 million tonnes of diesel annually) are used in agriculture. Diesel is required not only for irrigation but also to operate machinery used for land preparation, planting, harvesting, threshing and transporting agricultural produce.

The increase in diesel prices will therefore affect almost every stage of agricultural production, putting further pressure on farmers and food production while potentially worsening food insecurity and inflation.

At a time when inflation is already high (reaching 8.26 per cent in August 2026) and wages are rising at a slower pace, higher transport costs are likely to push up food prices and service charges, placing an even greater burden on ordinary people.

For lower-income households, higher fuel costs are particularly difficult to absorb because a larger share of their income is spent on essential goods and services, whose prices are heavily influenced by transportation and energy costs.

Media reports suggest that the chairman of Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) wrote to the Energy Division about the corporation’s financial crisis and mounting losses. In the BPC letter dated September 8, two factors were identified as the main causes of BPC’s financial difficulties. The first was that domestic fuel prices had not been adjusted regularly in line with global prices. The second was a change in the method of assessing duties and taxes on petroleum products introduced in June 2025.

Under the new system, duties and taxes on imported petroleum products are calculated based on their actual import or invoice value rather than a fixed tariff value. As a result, when international fuel prices rise, the amount of duty payable also increases, contributing significantly to BPC’s losses. According to BPC, the change has increased its tax burden by around Tk 15–20 per litre compared with the previous system.

Following the rise in international fuel prices amid the conflict in the Middle East, the import duty and taxes rose to Tk 38.64 per litre in March, Tk 38.90 in April, Tk 29.74 in July, and Tk 32.44 in August. In September, the duty is expected to be around Tk 38–40 per litre.

Government officials have described fuel price adjustments as “the only acceptable option” to prevent a massive fiscal deficit, ease pressure on the treasury and reduce the government’s subsidy burden. According to published reports, BPC’s accumulated losses amounted to more than Tk 22,875 crore between March and August 2026 as conflicts in the Middle East disrupted energy supply chains and increased energy procurement and shipping costs.

Officials have also argued that adjusting domestic fuel prices was necessary to prevent cross-border smuggling to neighbouring countries where fuel prices are higher. At the same time, the government has faced the challenge of reducing subsidies on fuel imports while preserving resources for social safety-net programmes.

Against this backdrop, the government has chosen to impose additional costs on the public in order to reduce BPC’s annual losses by Tk 10,000 crore.

Some economists argue that the government could seek to balance the expenditure burdens through stricter austerity measures and more disciplined public spending (government has repeatedly announced and introduced austerity measures including reducing fuel and electricity consumption in public offices by 30 per cent, halting new vehicle procurement and restricting foreign travels) while directing resources that generate broader economic and social benefits.

Dhaka University professor and economist Selim Raihan has highlighted the concerns that the government ministries frequently fail spending and savings targets because there is little or no quarterly or half yearly oversight to ensure compliance. Moreover, efforts to cut expenditures foreign training, vehicle purchases and hospitality budgets often face resistances from bureaucrats and administrative bodies.

At the same time, the government has decided to implement a new pay scale for government employees. Published reports suggest that the new pay scale is expected to increase government expenditure by Tk 1,05,380 crore over three years: Tk 37,372 crore in the current year, Tk 44,838 crore in 2027 and Tk 23,170 crore in 2028.

The government has also committed thousands of crores to major and costly purchases, (including several Boeing passenger aircrafts, fighter jets and other equipment. This raises a broader question about government’s spending priorities. On the one hand, the government considers reducing BPC’s annual losses by Tk 10,000 crore by raising fuel prices, imposing additional costs on households and businesses. On the other hand, it has committed expenditures many times larger through higher government salaries, major equipment purchases and infrastructure projects.

The central issue, therefore, is not simply BPCs financial discipline or the need to balance its budget. It is also a question of government priorities: how limited public resources should be allocated, which expenditures should receive precedence, and how the burden of economic adjustment should be distributed between the government, businesses and ordinary citizens. Ultimately, the challenge is to reconcile the financial sustainability of the energy sector with the wider economic interests of households, businesses, farmers and the national economy.

Mushfiqur Rahman is a mining engineer. He writes on energy and environment issues.​
 

Amit urges global firms to join Bangladesh offshore bidding round
Bangladesh offers 26 Bay of Bengal blocks as government highlights offshore potential and investment opportunities


1790726300153.webp

State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Aninda Islam Amit addresses the World Energies Summit in London on Tuesday, September 29, 2026. Photo: Collected

State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Aninda Islam Amit on Tuesday urged international oil and gas companies to participate in the Bangladesh Offshore Bidding Round 2026.

He made the call while addressing the Ministerial Address on the Strategic Stage of the two-day World Energies Summit in London, where he highlighted Bangladesh’s growing energy demand, offshore energy potential and improved investment framework.

The state minister also highlighted the government’s commitment to increasing the exploration and production of domestic gas and energy resources amid the country’s rapidly growing energy demand, according to a press release.

At the event, which will end on Wednesday, Bangladesh’s growing energy demand, offshore energy potential and improved investment framework were presented before international investors.

The state minister invited international oil and gas companies to participate in the Bangladesh Offshore Bidding Round 2026, under which a total of 26 blocks in the Bay of Bengal have been opened for investors, including 11 shallow-water blocks and 15 deep-water blocks.

Chairman of Invest Bangladesh Chowdhury Ashik Mahmud Bin Harun presented an overview of Bangladesh’s overall investment climate, highlighting macroeconomic stability, the growing momentum of investment and the government’s supportive policies for international investors.

The presentation also highlighted Bangladesh’s relatively unexplored offshore potential, availability of modern seismic data and the competitive commercial terms of the Offshore Model Production Sharing Contract 2026.

The Bangladesh delegation called upon international energy companies to review the geological and seismic data and directly contact the Bangladesh government and Bangladesh Oil, Gas & Mineral Corporation (Petrobangla) to participate in the ongoing bidding round.

On the first day of the summit, the Bangladesh delegation also held meetings with four international oil companies on the sidelines.

During the meetings, the delegation highlighted the benefits of the ongoing offshore bidding round and requested the companies to participate in the bidding process.

On the final day of the summit on Wednesday, meetings will be held with four more major companies from around the world.​
 

Private investment in rooftop solar


1790810343514.webp


The energy crisis is no longer merely a matter of households struggling with shortages of gas and electricity; it is a threat to the country’s economic future. It is because energy security has a direct bearing on industrialisation, investment, employment generation and export competitiveness. Acute shortages of gas and electricity have recently crippled production in hundreds of factories. Energy experts therefore opine that the government and the private sector have to work in tandem to find a sustainable and long-term solution to the energy crisis.

According to the Bangladesh Power Development Board (PDB), the country’s grid-connected power generation capacity stood at 28,919 megawatts (MW) as of June 2026, while total capacity, including captive and off-grid generation, was 32,332 MW. However, actual generation is far below the installed capacity due to shortages of primary fuels including gas, coal and furnace oil. Reports suggest that overall electricity generation during this summer has been hovering around 13,000–14,000 MW against demand of roughly 16,000–17,000 MW. This 4000 MW shortfall triggered widespread loadshedding across the country in August. The gap between installed capacity and actual generation lays bare the fact that the challenge in the power sector is not merely to increase generation capacity. Rather, the priority should be to ensure the availability of primary fuel and address technical and transmission constraints so that existing power plants can operate close to their available capacity.

Recent PDB data also underscore another major weakness in the country’s energy sector: its heavy dependence on fossil fuels. Of the country’s total installed power generation capacity, around 44 per cent is gas-based, around 24 per cent is coal-based and around 23 per cent is furnace-oil-based. By contrast, solar power accounts for only about 1.94 per cent and wind power a mere 0.22 per cent. And the result is that power generation is frequently hampered by dwindling supplies from local gas fields, as well as disruptions in LNG imports caused by global price volatility, supply chain disruptions or technical glitches.

Moreover, when the prices of LNG, coal and oil rise in the international market, they not only increase the cost of power generation but also put pressure on the country’s foreign-currency reserves. Meanwhile, inadequate gas supply, low gas pressure, load-shedding and rising energy prices ultimately increase the cost of production. This is all the more concerning for export-oriented sectors, as higher production costs can erode their global price competitiveness.

Against this backdrop, diversifying the country’s energy mix, particularly by expanding renewable sources such as solar power, is not only a choice but an imperative. Neighbouring countries have already demonstrated the potential of solar energy to reduce dependence on conventional fuels. Pakistan, for instance, has rapidly expanded solar generation, with installed solar capacity reportedly exceeding 6,000 MW and meeting a substantial share of its electricity needs. The country estimates that greater reliance on solar power could save billions of dollars annually by reducing fuel imports. India, too, has significantly expanded its renewable-energy capacity, with renewable sources now contributing tens of thousands of megawatts to its power system. Bangladesh, by comparison, has less than 1,600 MW of solar generation capacity. For years, the scarcity of land has been cited as a major obstacle to large-scale solar expansion. However, a study by the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA) estimates that rooftop spaces on industrial, commercial and residential buildings in urban areas alone could support 7,000–8,000 MW of electricity generation. Energy experts therefore see rooftop systems as a faster and cost-effective way to boost renewable energy capacity without requiring large tracts of land for utility-scale renewable projects.

Encouragingly, the government has set a target of meeting 20 per cent, or 5,000 MW, of total electricity demand from renewable sources by 2030, with the share rising to 30 per cent by 2040. Of late, the government has also announced a host of measures to revitalise the renewable energy sector. These include reducing the import duty on solar equipment to 1 per cent from 17 per cent, installing rooftop solar systems on government buildings, and providing incentives for rooftop solar installations in the private sector. The government has also approved the Net Metering Guideline 2025. Under the programme, consumers generating surplus electricity will be able sell it directly to the government at Tk10.50 per kilowatt.

However, financing is crucial. Installing rooftop solar systems initially requires substantial investment. The government can either subsidise solar panels and battery storage systems or direct banks and financial institutions to offer low-interest loans for such installations. At the same time, the tax policy for solar panels, inverters, battery storage and related technologies should be designed in a way that makes them more affordable.

Another important factor is policy continuity. Rooftop solar system installations require considerable upfront investment, and businesses will commit this fund only when they have confidence that the policy environment will remain supportive over the lifespan of a solar system. Policies related to net metering and surplus power sales must be transparent and predictable over the long term. Frequent policy changes or uncertainty over these arrangements could discourage private investment. A stable policy framework, therefore, is essential to encourage large factories and commercial establishments to invest in rooftop solar. If such establishments can meet even 25 per cent of their electricity needs from solar power, the combined effect could make a significant contribution to reducing pressure on the national grid and lowering dependence on conventional energy sources. A strong public-private partnership can transform the private sector from a passive energy consumer into an active energy producer, helping the government build a more reliable, resilient and sustainable energy system in the long term.​
 

Petrobangla sees no LNG shortage as 19 cargoes due in Oct-Nov


1790810657567.webp


Petrobangla has secured 19 LNG cargoes for October and November, ensuring uninterrupted supply and ruling out any shortage during the two-month period, officials from Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation Petrobangla) said.

Of the total, 10 cargoes are scheduled to arrive in October and the remaining nine in November. So, there will be no shortage of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) during October and November, they said.

Talking to BSS, Petrobangla Chairman Md Abdul Mannan said there is no problem regarding LNG-carrying cargoes for November as the required nine cargoes have been confirmed.

He said necessary LNG cargoes have been secured for October as well, with a total of 10 cargoes scheduled for import. This ensures preparedness for LNG supplies over the coming months.

Mannan said, “We are consistently trying to ensure the necessary LNG supplies for the upcoming three-month period. This approach eliminates the risk of any gas supply shortages from LNG availability.”

Petrobangla oversees LNG imports with the approval of the Energy Division.

Meanwhile, Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Limited (RPGCL), a subsidiary of Petrobangla, is responsible for tasks such as LNG importation, cargo scheduling, contract negotiation and implementation, and terminal operations.

Sources at Petrobangla and RPGCL told BSS that the import of a total of 19 LNG cargoes has been confirmed for October and November.

Of the total, 10 cargoes scheduled for October. So, three will be sourced from the spot market, two under long-term contracts, and five under short-term contracts.

Additionally, nine cargoes of LNG are scheduled for import in November. Of those, six will be brought under long-term agreements and three under short-term agreements.

These cargoes have been sourced from various countries, including the United States, Nigeria and Angola.

They said LNG is being procured from diverse sources to meet domestic demand. The cargoes will arrive according to schedule and subsequently be supplied to the national gas grid.

According to RPGCL data, each cargo contains about 32 lakh million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) of LNG. Based on this, the import of about 60.8 million MMBtu of LNG has been secured across the 19 cargoes scheduled for October and November.

The imported LNG arrives at the country’s LNG terminals via sea routes, where it undergoes a process known as regasification - converting the LNG back into a gaseous state.

Following regasification, the gas is supplied to the national gas grid through pipelines.

Petrobangla Director (Finance) Mizanur Rahman said the secured shipments include cargoes under both long-term and short-term agreements, alongside purchases from the spot market.

With imports secured to meet demand, no major disruptions in LNG supply are anticipated over the coming months, he said.

Petrobangla officials said the imported LNG is supplied to the national gas grid after regasification, after which the gas is used in various sectors of the country.

Qatar-based QatarEnergy and OQ Trading of Omani supply LNG to Bangladesh under long-term agreements. Besides, OQ Trading supplies LNG to Bangladesh under short-term contracts.

Bangladesh also imports LNG from the spot market as required.​
 

Bangladesh invites global firms to bid for 26 offshore blocks
Staff Correspondent 29 September, 2026, 22:14

1790813230574.webp

Press Release Photo

Bangladesh has invited international oil and gas companies to participate in its 2026 offshore bidding round for 26 blocks in the Bay of Bengal, the energy ministry said.

The invitation was made at a ministerial session of the World Energies Summit in London on Tuesday, according to a press release issued by the ministry.

State minister for power, energy and mineral resources Aninda Islam Amit said Bangladesh’s energy demand was increasing with economic growth and that the government was working to expand exploration and production of domestic gas and other energy resources.

He urged international oil and gas companies to participate in the Bangladesh Offshore Bidding Round 2026.

Under the bidding round, 11 shallow-water and 15 deep-water blocks in the Bay of Bengal have been opened to international investors.

Invest Bangladesh chairman Chowdhury Ashik Mahmud Bin Harun presented an overview of Bangladesh’s economy at the session, highlighting the country’s macroeconomic conditions, investment flows and government measures to facilitate international investment.

His presentation also highlighted Bangladesh’s offshore exploration prospects, available seismic data and the commercial terms offered under the Offshore Model Production Sharing Contract 2026.

At the event, the Bangladesh delegation encouraged international energy companies to review the available geological and seismic data and contact the government and Petrobangla directly to participate in the bidding round.​
 

HEALING BANGLADESH'S ELECTRICITY WOES
ADB to funnel funds into govt's ambitious solar power recipe
Targets reforms for energy eco-system dev, renewable energy integration in grid system


1790984137164.webp



Policy-based lending by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) is expected funnel several-hundred million dollars into government's ambitious recipe to heal electricity crises by enhancing solar-power generation, officials said.

A team of the ADB, led by its Director of the South Asia Energy Team Sujata Gupta, held out the support in meetings with the officials from Finance Division, Power Division, Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA), Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC) and Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) during three days ending Thursday.

Earlier, the Power Division had requested the ADB support through policy-based lending to accelerate renewable-energy development, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, promote clean and environmentally sustainable electricity generation, reduce power-sector subsidies, strengthen sector sustainability, and contribute to the achievement of the UN-designated Sustainable Development Goals.

The Power Division also had requested the Finance Division to seek $2.0 billion from the ADB to materialise its rooftop solar power ambition. Subsequently, the Finance Division requested the Economic Relations Division to place the proposal to the ADB for getting the loan "as soon as possible".

Sources said during the meetings with the officials, the ADB team discussed the government priorities and ongoing policy and regulatory reforms for accelerating renewable-energy development.

Also, they reviewed recent policy and regulatory and institutional measures to identify key constraints to scaling up renewable energy investment, including private-sector participation, sources said.

Moreover, they discussed issues and areas for identifying potential policy actions that could be supported under the proposed ADB policy-based loan.

Also, the proposed policy-reform areas and implementation arrangements came into discussion during the meetings, sources familiar with the developments said.

According to officials concerned, initially, the ADB officials said they would bring forward US$100 million from the pipeline and add some more to the amount for releasing several hundred million dollars to help materialise the government's solar- power ambitions.

The size of the proposed policy-based loan and an indicative timeline for processing the loan will be finalised after having meeting with the top officials from the ERD, sources said.

In exchange, the ADB asks Bangladesh to carry out reforms for financial sustainability, energy-ecosystem development, and integration of renewable energy in grid system, according to officials concerned.

In the recent weeks, the government has taken a range of measures to accelerate renewable-energy deployment. It has issued several regulatory orders and notifications to incentivise rooftop solar development, introduced policy directions to promote private- sector investment in merchant power plants, and issued guidelines to facilitate renewable- energy projects through public-private partnerships on land owned by state-owned entities.

The government also set target to generate an additional 3,000 to 4,000 megawatts of electricity from rooftop solar before next summer to avoid the possible power crisis then.

Also, the government high-ups ordered diversion of necessary funds from the development budget as the private-sector renewable-energy producers suggested creation of funds for financing rooftop solar-power generation.

Following that, a Tk 15-billion fund has been created by repurposing Tk 10 billion from budgetary allocation for Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) sector and Tk 5.0 billion from operating loans.

President of Bangladesh Sustainable and Renewable Energy Association (BSREA) Mostafa Al Mahmud told The Financial Express a large sum of financial support is necessary to materialise the government's target of generating 3,000 to 4,000MW electricity from rooftop solar before next summer.

"Foreign funds can be a good option for the government since many multilateral development partners provide low-cost funds for clean energy generation," he said.​
 

Bangladesh’s coal turn is a fresh bad sign for LNG exporters

REUTERS, Littleton

1790986662764.webp

Labourers unload coal from a cargo ship in Dhaka. Coal-fired electricity generation overtook gas-fired generation for the first time this summer in Bangladesh, data from Ember shows. Photo: AFP/FILE

Bangladesh should be one of the global LNG industry’s success stories, but instead it is a warning sign.

Few countries better fit the profile of a future liquefied natural gas growth market.

Electricity demand is rising, domestic gas reserves are falling, and policymakers have invested heavily in LNG import infrastructure to bridge the gap.

For years, those trends helped make Bangladesh a veritable poster child among LNG bulls who argued that rapidly growing Asian economies would underpin LNG demand growth for decades.

Instead, Bangladesh has crossed a milestone that should give LNG investors pause.

Coal-fired electricity generation overtook gas-fired generation for the first time this summer, data from Ember shows, marking a dramatic shift for a country where gas previously accounted for over 90 percent of electricity supplies.

Coal-fired electricity output was 3.92 terawatt hours (TWh) in July, compared to 3.66 TWh of generation from gas-fired plants.

That flip is significant because it has implications for gas use trends across the broader developing world.

COAL COMPETITION

The LNG industry’s growth story rests on a relatively small group of markets.

Demand in Europe is expected to flatten or decline over time as renewables expand.

Japan and South Korea remain major gas importers but both have more new nuclear power generation capacity under construction than gas-fired capacity, according to Global Energy Monitor (GEM), which should limit gas-fired growth.

China remains important, but its energy strategy is also mainly focused on developing domestic clean energy supplies and limiting fossil fuel import reliance.

That leaves emerging Asia, where countries such as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam and the Philippines have long been viewed as the next generation of LNG buyers.

Those countries are expected to account for much of the growth needed to absorb the massive wave of LNG export capacity being built in the United States, Qatar and elsewhere.

The problem is that these countries are also among the world’s most price-sensitive energy consumers.

Bangladesh’s latest power mix data illustrates the challenge.

Despite expanding access to LNG imports, gas is losing market share to cheaper coal.

That is the opposite of what LNG bulls need to see.

ECONOMIC PAIN

The shift in Bangladesh’s power mix is primarily driven by costs.

Developing economies need reliable electricity, but it needs to be cheap and abundant enough to support industrial growth and expanding urban populations.

In many cases, those priorities outweigh concerns about emissions, and put LNG at a disadvantage.

Unlike domestic energy sources, LNG exposes buyers to global fuel markets.

And following the outbreak of Russia’s war with Ukraine in 2022 and the US and Israeli war with Iran in 2026, global gas buyers have received the painful message that gas imports can get very expensive.

Since the first US and Israeli strikes against Iran in late February, Asian LNG prices have surged from around $11 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) to over $25/MMBtu, dealing a stinging blow to cost-sensitive buyers, LSEG data shows.

Of course, coal carries its own risks, but remains substantially cheaper in Asia at the equivalent of around $6.50/MMBtu for supplies from Australia and nearer $5.00/MMBtu from Indonesia, according to LSEG.

And when governments are trying to keep electricity affordable, those considerations matter.

BROADER MESSAGE

What makes Bangladesh notable is that it appears to be part of a broader pattern.

Several Asian countries have registered steady declines in natural gas’s share of their generation mixes in recent years, including Pakistan and India, which were also viewed as high-potential LNG markets.

Even in Japan, one of the world’s largest LNG importers, gas’s share of the electricity mix has declined from over 40 percent in 2020 to around 28 percent so far this year, Ember data shows.

China is also registering declining gas intensity in power generation.

Despite becoming the world’s largest LNG importer, gas remains only a marginal contributor in China’s electricity production, accounting for around 3 percent of the generation mix so far in 2026. These declines in gas reliance for power generation in key Asian markets undermine arguments that rising electricity demand automatically triggers rising gas consumption.

Indeed, across much of Asia, gas is finding itself squeezed between rapidly growing renewable power and a coal sector that remains difficult to dislodge.

STAYING POWER

Much of the energy-transition debate was previously framed around the idea that gas would gradually displace coal in emerging markets, before being displaced itself by renewables and batteries.

But those discussions overlook the fact that many power operators across Asia remain in no rush to replace coal systems that they have spent decades building and remain cheap to operate.

As a result, every new LNG cargo must justify its cost against a fuel that many developing countries prefer on cost and reliability grounds.

The result is a challenging commercial reality for the LNG export sector.

While wealthy economies may value gas for its emissions advantages and flexibility, lower-income economies often place a higher premium on affordability.

That creates an uncomfortable mismatch between where LNG suppliers need demand growth and where LNG can most easily compete.

WARNING SIGNS

None of this means LNG demand is about to collapse.

Global gas consumption continues to grow in many markets, and new import infrastructure continues to be built.

But Bangladesh offers a valuable reminder that future demand is unlikely to be as automatic as some projections assume.

The world’s LNG industry is currently investing billions of dollars in new export capacity based on the assumption that developing economies will steadily increase gas consumption as their electricity systems expand.

Bangladesh’s experience highlights that gas use has the potential to follow a declining trajectory instead, and may lead LNG investors to ask how many other countries may follow similar paths.​
 

Experts suggest for long-term policy certainty
Prothom Alo English Desk

1791068887773.webp


A webinar titled “Bangladesh's Renewable Energy Transition: Closing the Gap to 2030, and the Economic Opportunity Ahead” was organised by the Dacca Institute of Research and Analytics (daira) on Friday to discuss Bangladesh’s renewable energy targets. Collected

A webinar titled “Bangladesh's Renewable Energy Transition: Closing the Gap to 2030, and the Economic Opportunity Ahead” was organised by the Dacca Institute of Research and Analytics (daira) on Friday to discuss Bangladesh’s renewable energy targets, the challenges of implementation, and the policy and infrastructure requirements for accelerating the country’s transition toward renewable energy, says a press release.

Speakers at the webinar highlighted the existing gap between Bangladesh’s renewable energy ambitions and its current capacity to deliver them.

The discussion focused on the need for grid modernisation, energy storage, reliable and accessible energy data, institutional coordination, private-sector investment, and long-term policy certainty.

Speakers also examined the economic and energy-security implications of Bangladesh’s continued dependence on imported fossil fuels.

The session began with a presentation of a policy brief by daira researcher Suborna Akther Laboni. The presentation highlighted that renewable energy currently accounts for approximately 2.3 per cent of Bangladesh’s grid electricity, while the government has set a target of achieving a 20 per cent renewable energy share by 2030.

The presentation noted that solar power costs approximately Tk 9.5 per unit, compared with around Tk 25 per unit for oil-fired generation, highlighting the economic potential of renewable energy.

The presentation further noted that only around 358 MW of renewable energy capacity was under construction as of February 2026, while approximately 760 MW would need to be added annually to remain on track toward the 2030 target.

Meeting the target would require an estimated US$933–980 million in annual investment through 2030. The presentation also highlighted the employment potential of rooftop solar, which generates approximately 26.6 jobs per MW, compared with around 2.1 jobs per MW for utility-scale solar.

The policy brief also examined the challenges surrounding Bangladesh’s electricity grid and renewable energy financing. It noted that a US$515 million World Bank grid programme was rated 'moderately unsatisfactory' in December 2024, having enabled approximately 0.04 GW of renewable energy capacity against a 0.15 GW target.

The presentation also discussed recent policy developments, including the cancellation of 31 renewable energy projects with a combined capacity of approximately 3,300 MW in September 2024, their reopening for review in April 2026, duty relief introduced in the FY2027 budget, and the rooftop solar incentive launched in September 2026.

Speaking on the institutional dimensions of Bangladesh’s energy transition, John Fluharty, Resident Programme Director at the International Republican Institute, emphasised the importance of transparency, accountability, and institutional trust.

He argued that a sustainable energy transition requires institutions capable of bringing different stakeholders into the decision-making process and ensuring clear oversight of public funds.

He stated, “The idea that transparency and accountability equals bureaucracy is just a bad way to look at it.”

He further emphasised that publishing information and establishing shared processes can strengthen trust and facilitate more effective decision-making.

Discussing the technical challenges facing Bangladesh’s electricity system, Mohammad Subail Bin Alam, COO of Rancon Infrastructures and Adjunct Faculty Member at the University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, stated, “We are not ready.”

He explained that Bangladesh’s existing grid was primarily designed around a limited number of large power plants and one-way electricity flows. The expansion of rooftop and distributed solar, he noted, would require two-way distribution networks, upgraded transformers, advanced monitoring systems such as SCADA, and greater battery-storage capacity.

He further argued that transmission, generation, and monitoring infrastructure must be planned together if Bangladesh is to add the volume of renewable capacity required to meet its targets.

Referring to the experience of Pakistan, he noted that rapid solar expansion without adequate storage and grid planning could create additional pressure on the electricity system.

He also called for policy certainty of at least five years, greater coordination among institutions including SREDA and the Bangladesh Power Development Board, and increased access to concessional financing.

Highlighting the importance of transparency and reliable information, Md Ismail Ali, Editor of The Daily Jatiyo Arthoniti, called for the establishment of a centralised and publicly accessible digital energy database.

He suggested that such a system should be updated regularly and enable policymakers, investors, researchers, and citizens to compare renewable energy targets, installed capacity, and actual electricity generation.

He also raised concerns about short-term policy incentives, arguing that investors require greater certainty when making investments in infrastructure with long operational lifespans.

According to him, renewable energy projects cannot be effectively financed when policy commitments remain limited to short periods.

The moderator, Sakib Bin Amin, Senior Research Fellow at daira and Professor of Economics at North South University, highlighted the importance of addressing inefficiencies across Bangladesh’s wider electricity system.

He noted that transmission and distribution losses of nearly 10 per cent, compared with approximately 2–3 per cent globally, indicate significant scope for improving system efficiency.

Amin proposed greater use of public-private partnerships, including build-operate-transfer models, alongside the establishment of a national energy data centre and an environmental quality council.

He also emphasised the importance of strengthening energy storage capacity, monitoring subsidies to ensure they reach their intended beneficiaries, and promoting energy efficiency and demand-side management to reduce pressure on imported fuel.

The discussion also highlighted the importance of establishing a predictable policy environment for renewable energy investment.

Speakers emphasised that frequent changes in incentives, unclear institutional responsibilities, inadequate infrastructure, and limited access to affordable financing could undermine Bangladesh’s ability to translate renewable energy targets into actual projects.

Concluding the discussion, Sakib Bin Amin emphasised that Bangladesh’s challenge is increasingly one of implementation rather than target-setting.

He stated, “We need to connect policy with projects, projects with finance, finance with infrastructure, and generation with a grid capable of absorbing and delivering that electricity reliably.”

The webinar brought together representatives from academia, the private sector, media, research, and policy institutions to discuss the opportunities and challenges surrounding Bangladesh’s renewable energy transition.

The discussion formed part of daira’s broader engagement on sustainable development, economic policy, energy security, and emerging policy challenges in Bangladesh.​
 

442MW Rampal solar project awaits ECNEC approval


1791243271163.webp



The government has planned to set up a Tk 2,502.39 crore project to build a 442-megawatt-peak (DC) solar photovoltaic power plant at Rampal in Bagerhat, aiming to increase renewable power generation and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

The proposed “Construction of 442 MWp (DC) Solar Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Power Plant at Block-B, Rampal” project will be implemented by Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) under the Power Division from July 2026 to December 2029, reports UNB.

The project proposal will be placed before the ECNEC on Wednesday for final approval, according to the Project Evaluation Committee (PEC) of the Planning Commission for scrutiny.

Of the total estimated cost, Tk 375.35 crore will come from BPDB’s own resources, while Tk 2,127.03 crore will be financed from the Power Sector Development Fund.

The Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC) had given in-principle approval on May 22, 2022, for financing Tk 2,380 crore, equivalent to 85 percent of the project’s then-estimated cost, from the Power Sector Development Fund.

The project will be implemented on 685 acres of usable land in Block-B of the Rampal power plant complex.

BPDB acquired 1,834 acres of land in Rampal in 2012, dividing it into Block-A, covering 915.50 acres, and Block-B, covering 918.50 acres.

Block-A houses the 1,320MW Maitree Super Thermal Power Plant, while Block-B remains under BPDB.

Land development, preservation work and construction of a boundary wall have already been completed there.

According to the project proposal, 76.63 acres of Block-B have been kept as a green belt, 32.87 acres for flood protection embankments, 94 acres as low-lying land and around 30 acres as a lake.

The proposed solar plant will include installation of solar panels, inverter stations, a pooling substation, power evacuation facilities and other civil works.

The project will also engage foreign consultants for 32 person-months and local consultants for 52 person-months.

Electricity generated by the plant will be converted to 230kV through 0.8/33kV and 33/230kV substations and evacuated through an approximately three-kilometre 230kV double-circuit transmission line to the adjacent Bangladesh-India Friendship Power Company Ltd (BIFPCL) 400/230kV substation.

Three new 230kV bays, including one spare, will have to be constructed at the BIFPCL substation for connecting the solar plant to the national grid.

The project proposal says the plant is intended to support the government’s renewable energy target, fuel diversification and reduction of carbon emissions.

It says Bangladesh’s power generation capacity currently stands at 32,332MW, with renewable sources accounting for 1,216MW, or 3.76 percent.

The government has set a target of raising the share of renewable energy in the overall energy mix to 20 percent by 2030, according to the proposal.

The project is also aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 7, which seeks affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.

The proposal says the solar plant will help reduce reliance on gas, oil and coal and avoid emissions of carbon dioxide, sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter associated with fossil-fuel-based generation.

The project was initially examined through an in-house feasibility study by BPDB in March 2022.

The Planning Commission has raised an issue over the feasibility study, noting that the relevant government guideline requires investment projects costing more than Tk 50 crore to undergo feasibility studies by experienced, independent and professional institutions or consultants.

However, a detailed feasibility study by Infrastructure Investment Facilitation Company (IIFC), a government-owned institution, was completed in May 2025.

Based on its recommendations, the draft Development Project Proposal (DPP) was sent to the Power Division on June 4, 2025.

The project scrutiny committee held a meeting on February 25, 2026, after which the Power Division sent the DPP to the Planning Commission.​
 

Bangladesh eyes LNG, fertiliser import from Algeria under G2G deal
Salahuddin further calls on Algeria to hire skilled workers from Bangladesh, including doctors and nurses


1791271964761.webp

Photo: UNB

Bangladesh and Algeria have set in motion a government-to-government (G2G) initiative for long-term imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and fertiliser.

Home Minister Salahuddin Ahmed disclosed the plan after a meeting with Algerian Ambassador to Bangladesh Dr Abdelouahab Saidani at his ministry office on Monday.


He said Bangladesh will import LNG and fertiliser from Algeria under the G2G framework.

Salahuddin also urged Algeria to widen the trade basket in Dhaka's favour, saying Algiers could increase imports of Bangladeshi garments and pharmaceutical products.

Salahuddin further called on Algeria to hire skilled workers from Bangladesh, including doctors and nurses.

Beyond trade and energy, the two sides discussed maintaining peace and order, security cooperation, preventing and combating human trafficking, migration management, and expanding economic and commercial ties.

They laid particular emphasis on specialised training to improve the efficiency and professionalism of security forces, joint workshops, and the exchange of legislative support.

Recalling that Algeria was the first Arab country to recognise Bangladesh after its independence in 1971, the ambassador voiced his country's strong interest in further strengthening the historic and friendly relationship.

Referring to the invitation extended by Prime Minister Tarique Rahman to the Algerian President to visit Dhaka, Salahuddin said Bangladesh is pleased that the invitation has been accepted.

He stressed fixing a mutually convenient diplomatic date for the visit.

At the end of the meeting, both countries reaffirmed their commitment to deepening and strengthening cooperation in security, trade and bilateral diplomatic relations.​
 

Bringing volatile LPG market to order


1791328959328.webp


The Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission (BERC)'s decision on Sunday to raise the price of a 12-kg cylinder of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) by Tk252 to Tk1,837 at one go is a jolt to common consumers. The regulator reportedly attributed the increase to higher international prices of propane and butane (constituents of LPG), enhanced freight and traders' premiums and increased transportation costs following the equally cut-throat fuel-oil price hike. The BERC expects the adjustment would bring the volatile LPG market to order. But will a higher official price stabilise a market when the prices fixed earlier by the regulator were hardly ever complied with? In September, when BERC fixed LPG price, in many places consumers had to pay up to Tk500 more for a cylinder of the gas. After the latest hike of LPG price, dealers are charging an additional amount between Tk 300 and Tk 400 for a 12-kg cylinder. Clearly, the problem is not purely one of price-setting.

Intriguingly, the price instability persists despite LPG operators' claim that there is no overall shortage. According to the LPG Operators Association of Bangladesh (LOAB), the quantities of LPG imported in the previous two months should be enough to meet domestic demand. The government also reviewed National Board of Revenue (NBR) data on import, stock and supply and found the overall position satisfactory. Furthermore, it has, facilitated private operators by restructuring the tax regime, removing VAT at production and trading stages and advance tax on imports while raising import and storage limits. The government-imported LPG is also in the market to supplement private supply. Yet the benefits provided to businesses are not being reflected at the consumers' end. For households without pipeline gas, LPG is not a luxury but an essential cooking fuel. So, to claim that LPG imports are adequate is cold comfort for the consumer public as they have to pay through the nose for a cylinder.

Against this backdrop, the BERC's instruction to a number of LPG importers for submission of their September sales information deserves attention. The regulator reportedly sought details of sales to bottled-gas consumers, industries and autogas users following allegations that supplies to the retail market were deliberately squeezed in anticipation of a price increase. Distributors, on the other hand, complain that they are not getting LPG from operators at regulator-approved rates, while importers reject the allegation. Somewhere between import terminal, storage, bottling plant, distributor, dealer and retailer, the officially determined price is being lost. That should not remain a matter of allegation and counter-allegation. If imports are sufficient, there has to be an explanation why cylinders disappear from shops and reappear at prices far above the BERC rate. The repeated failure to enforce the official price also raises a basic question about the usefulness of monthly price announcements unless the regulator can ensure compliance throughout the supply chain.

In that case, the government and BERC need to move beyond issuing warnings and conducting sporadic market drives. What is necessary is a real-time system of keeping tabs on how much LPG each operator imports, stores, bottles and sells, to whom and at what stage of the distribution chain. Those data should be matched with customs records and periodically audited so any unexplained withholding of supply can be detected early. Genuine increases in international price and freight costs have to be reflected in domestic prices. True, no market can be insulated from global realities. But such cost increases cannot be an excuse for artificial scarcity or profiteering. The government, therefore, should track down the rackets behind artificial supply crisis of LPG before meting out punishment to those responsible.​
 

Unlocking the potential of wind power


1791329054514.webp



As energy security rises ever higher on the government's agenda, exploring every viable source of energy has become an imperative. Leaving any potential energy source unexplored is no longer an option. Against this backdrop, the government's decision to introduce comprehensive guidelines for developing onshore wind-power projects marks a timely and potentially transformative step towards diversifying the country's energy mix.

The newly unveiled framework seeks to establish a clear and transparent pathway for the development of land-based wind power projects. Industry leaders have welcomed the initiative, expressing optimism that the guidelines will encourage greater private-sector participation while enabling Bangladesh to unlock what many believe to be its still largely untapped wind-energy potential. More importantly, the framework reflects growing policy recognition that achieving long-term energy security will require the country to move decisively beyond its overwhelming reliance on conventional fuels.

Wind energy has long been regarded as one of the world's most promising renewable resources. It is clean, inexhaustible and increasingly cost-competitive as technological advancements continue to improve turbine efficiency and reduce generation costs. Unlike fossil-fuel-based power plants, wind farms emit no greenhouse gases during operation and require no imported fuel. For a country like Bangladesh, which spends billions of dollars annually on importing coal, liquefied natural gas and petroleum products, the economic significance of such a resource extends well beyond environmental considerations. Every additional megawatt generated from domestic renewable sources lessens the country's vulnerability to international fuel-market shocks and contributes to greater energy independence.

According to the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA), Bangladesh possesses modest but commercially viable onshore wind resources. These are concentrated primarily along the country's 710-kilometre coastline, the Chittagong Hill Tracts and selected open plains in the north-west. Extensive wind-resource mapping conducted jointly by SREDA and international partners has identified several promising sites where average annual wind speeds range between 5.0 and 7.5 metres per second at hub height-sufficient for utility-scale electricity generation using modern wind-turbine technology.

Yet despite this encouraging resource assessment, Bangladesh has barely begun to harness wind energy. At present, the country generates only 62 megawatts of electricity from wind out of a total renewable-energy capacity of 1,807 megawatts. The figure is strikingly small when viewed against the government's ambitious targets under the Renewable Energy Policy 2025, which aims to generate 20 per cent of the country's electricity from renewable sources by 2030 and 30 per cent by 2040.

The newly adopted guideline therefore deserves attention not merely as another regulatory document but as an effort to remove many of the uncertainties that have historically discouraged investment in renewable energy projects. Investors are often reluctant to commit capital where regulatory procedures remain ambiguous or project risks are difficult to assess. By laying down technically robust minimum standards aligned with internationally recognised benchmarks such as IEC 61400-1, IEC 61400-12 and the IFC Performance Standards, the government aims to provide developers, financiers and lenders with greater confidence that projects can be implemented under predictable rules.

Renewable-energy projects typically require substantial upfront investments and depend heavily on long-term financing. Financial institutions are far more willing to support projects where regulatory requirements, land acquisition procedures, environmental compliance and grid-access arrangements are clearly defined. In this respect, the guideline attempts to reduce uncertainty by establishing a transparent regulatory pathway from project conception to commissioning.

The provisions relating to land acquisition and project implementation are particularly significant. Developers are required to ensure that all lands needed for turbines, substations, access roads, meteorological masts, cable routes and related infrastructure are legally available and comply with existing land-use regulations and environmental restrictions. Where the government allocates land for wind development, developers will have three years to complete project development and begin commissioning, although extensions may be granted in justified circumstances. Such provisions seek to strike a balance between preventing speculative land occupation and allowing sufficient flexibility for genuine investors facing unforeseen delays.

Another notable feature is the requirement to verify technical and commercial feasibility of grid connectivity before making investment commitments. This addresses one of the persistent challenges confronting renewable-energy projects worldwide. Electricity generation alone cannot ensure project success unless adequate transmission infrastructure exists to evacuate power efficiently.

The guideline also rightly encourages the integration of energy-storage systems alongside wind farms. As renewable-energy penetration increases, maintaining grid stability becomes increasingly important because wind generation naturally fluctuates with weather conditions. Battery storage technologies can smooth these variations, improve electricity dispatch, reduce curtailment and enhance overall grid reliability. Such integrated systems are rapidly becoming an essential component of modern renewable energy development across the world.

However, regulatory reform alone will not guarantee success. Wind-power development will ultimately depend on policy consistency, competitive financing, efficient approval processes and continued investment in transmission infrastructure. The government must also strengthen institutional capacity, ensure timely project implementation and maintain investor confidence through transparent decision-making. At the same time, local communities should be meaningfully engaged throughout project development to minimise social conflicts and ensure that environmental safeguards are rigorously observed.

The road ahead will undoubtedly present challenges. But every successful energy transition begins with the creation of credible institutions and sound policies. The new onshore wind-power guideline is one such building block. If implemented with sincerity, consistency and long-term vision, it can help transform Bangladesh's abundant coastal winds from an overlooked natural phenomenon into a dependable source of clean electricity and environmental stewardship.​
 

Bangladesh’s solar growth: Will the incentives be enough?

Moshahida Sultana Ritu

Bangladesh is betting on rooftops to help power its energy future—but will the promise of a guaranteed payment be enough to make people invest? In 2026, the government launched a special incentive package for rooftop solar, particularly systems paired with battery storage. The ambition is bold: expand renewable energy, ease pressure on the national grid, and strengthen energy security. Under the scheme, eligible consumers can sell surplus electricity to the grid for Tk 10.50 per unit. That rate starts with a benchmark generation cost of Tk 8, then adds a 20 percent profit margin and an 11.25 percent premium. Consumers who can generate power for less than the benchmark cost keep the difference as extra profit. But behind the attractive headline rate lies a bigger question: can this incentive deliver the solar growth Bangladesh is counting on?

The incentive is time-limited. Rooftop systems installed by February 28, 2027, qualify for the tariff, with payments continuing for three years, until February 28, 2030. The scheme also requires solar equipment—including panels, batteries, inverters and meters—to meet technical standards set by the Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution and the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority. Distribution utilities will record electricity supplied to and received from the grid, and incentive payments will be made through bank accounts or mobile financial services.

A tariff alone, however, cannot overcome the financial, regulatory and practical risks that shape investment decisions. Several features of this policy may limit how much solar growth it produces.

1791416397563.webp

Workers install a rooftop solar panel, as Bangladesh seeks to expand solar generation through new incentives. Photo: Star.

Tk 10.50 may not be enough to justify the investment

The first question is whether Tk 10.50 per unit offers a strong enough return to encourage consumers and businesses to invest. The figure may look attractive, but the purchase tariff is only one part of the investment calculation. Rooftop solar systems with battery storage require substantial upfront capital. Investors must also account for financing costs, equipment replacement, maintenance, installation and the possibility that project costs will rise.

The return also depends on how much electricity a system can supply to the grid. A household or business will generally use some of its solar power on site; only the surplus is eligible for the purchase tariff. The resulting revenue may therefore be lower or less predictable than the headline rate suggests. Battery storage adds cost, and its performance and replacement needs affect the project’s long-term economics.

Investors also consider the opportunity cost of their capital: money spent on solar cannot be used for other business or household purposes. A three-year guaranteed payment may not be enough to compensate for the upfront investment and the risks involved, particularly if the project’s overall financial return depends on what happens after the guaranteed period ends.

A short eligibility window can discourage careful investment

The second concern is the short time available to qualify. The scheme applies to systems installed by February 28, 2027, giving consumers a limited window to decide, secure finance, obtain approvals, procure compliant equipment and complete installation. A deadline can prompt action, but it can also encourage rushed decisions or exclude viable projects because of delays beyond investors’ control.

The timing compares unfavourably with approaches that give developers more time to respond. Vietnam, for instance, offered a time-bound feed-in tariff for one year. A longer eligibility window can give households, businesses and installers time to understand the rules, arrange financing and build projects without sacrificing quality. In Bangladesh, where procurement, approvals and installation can take time, a short deadline may reduce participation rather than accelerate it. Projects rushed to meet the deadline may also fall short of the required standards and end up as stranded investments.

A limited window is especially problematic when investors are uncertain about what happens after it closes. Consumers may be reluctant to make a major purchase if the guaranteed tariff is available only to systems completed by a particular date, because a project started in good time may still finish late. Short deadlines may also create bottlenecks, as applicants all seek approvals and equipment in the run-up to the deadline.

Three years of revenue certainty may not be enough

The third issue is the duration of the guaranteed price. The scheme offers Tk 10.50 per unit for three years, through February 2030. That commitment provides some predictability, but rooftop solar systems and batteries are long-term assets. Investors need to consider returns over a much longer period than the tariff’s guaranteed term.

Vietnam’s feed-in tariff was guaranteed for 20 years, giving investors a far longer period of revenue certainty. Such commitments helped make projects financeable, particularly as solar technology costs gradually declined. When investors can estimate revenue over many years, they can compare it more confidently with installation costs, financing payments and operating risks.

In Bangladesh, uncertainty about future electricity prices complicates that calculation. The government has recently increased oil and furnace-oil prices, while coal prices remain exposed to international volatility and geopolitical disruption. If the cost of conventional electricity rises, the government may eventually increase the price consumers pay for electricity or revise the value of power supplied to the grid. Investors may therefore wonder whether Tk 10.50 will remain attractive. If electricity prices rise above that level in the next few years, a three-year guarantee may seem too short to justify investing now.

This uncertainty creates two kinds of risk. Investors might expect higher future electricity prices but have no assurance that the solar purchase tariff will rise with them. They may also fear that a change in policy will alter the terms under which their project was approved. A predictable long-term framework is often more valuable than a nominally attractive tariff whose future is uncertain.

Incentives cannot substitute for risk-reducing policy

The fourth issue is the wider investment environment. Financial incentives can influence a decision, but they are most effective when supported by clear rules that reduce risk. In Bangladesh, prospective investors may still face uncertainty about future electricity prices, potential cost escalation, bureaucratic delays, the time required to complete projects and the process for receiving payments.

These risks matter because an incentive’s headline value is not the same as guaranteed profit. A business calculates expected earnings after considering the chance that costs will rise, approvals will be delayed or a project will miss the eligibility deadline. Unclear procedures may raise financing costs, while delays can postpone revenue and undermine returns. Requiring compliant equipment is sensible for safety and performance, but standards and certification processes must be transparent and readily accessible.


1791416485207.webp

Bangladesh’s 2026 rooftop solar package offers Tk 10.50 per unit for surplus electricity, but short timelines and policy uncertainty may limit investment. Visual: Artificial Intelligence.

The government could strengthen the scheme by clarifying application procedures, setting predictable timelines for approvals and payments, and explaining how tariff eligibility will be treated when delays are outside an applicant’s control. It should also communicate what happens after February 2030 and whether future projects will receive a similar arrangement. Such steps can lower perceived risk without necessarily increasing the purchase tariff.

Merchant solar faces additional barriers

The incentive package must also be assessed alongside the challenges faced by merchant power plants—solar projects built to sell electricity to buyers, unlike rooftop systems that mainly serve their owners. These projects may need land, grid access and dependable buyers. Acquiring agricultural land for large solar plants raises concerns about competing land uses, livelihoods and food production. Even where suitable sites exist, developers need clear rules and a credible process for obtaining land and permits.

Open-access rules allow private generators to use the grid to deliver power to customers, in return for wheeling charges. But those charges can erode solar’s price advantage. The 2026 framework lists transmission wheeling charges of about Tk 0.46 per unit at 230 kV, Tk 0.49 at 132 kV and Tk 0.79 at 33 kV. Additional distribution and injection charges are reported at Tk 0.97–1.58 per unit, depending on voltage. These fees may reflect network costs, but they add to the delivered price and complicate project economics.

A proposed benchmark price of Tk 6.48 per unit for solar merchant power plants may also be too low to attract investment. Developers must absorb land, financing, grid and administrative costs, and they bear risks that the benchmark may not reflect.

The incentive fails to account for solar’s cost advantage over other energy sources

The case for solar becomes clearer when its price is viewed alongside the cost of other electricity sources. Recent estimates put furnace-oil generation at roughly Tk 20.69–27.39 per unit, with higher costs reported during peak or emergency use. Coal-based generation is estimated at around Tk 13.20–15 per unit. Domestic gas-fired electricity can cost about Tk 7.09 per unit. Electricity produced with imported or spot LNG is far more expensive: estimates range from Tk 30 to Tk 50 or more per unit. These estimates are not perfectly comparable, as costs vary by plant, contract, fuel prices and operating conditions. Still, they show that solar, at a benchmark generation cost of Tk 8 per unit, can be cheaper than several of the alternatives Bangladesh relies on.

The power system may therefore pay for the availability of fossil-fuel plants as well as for the electricity they generate. Solar investors, by contrast, put up their own capital and are paid only for the electricity they actually supply.
The comparison matters even more because many conventional power plants receive capacity charges for keeping generating capacity available, even when they are not producing electricity. Rooftop solar receives no capacity payment. The power system may therefore pay for the availability of fossil-fuel plants as well as for the electricity they generate. Solar investors, by contrast, put up their own capital and are paid only for the electricity they actually supply.

Solar’s lower generation cost and the absence of a capacity charge should make it attractive from the perspective of system costs. Yet the Tk 10.50 purchase tariff, the short eligibility window and the limited three-year guarantee may not provide enough certainty or return to attract investment at scale. The low cost of solar does not automatically translate into a strong business case for households and firms if they bear substantial upfront costs and risks.

Policy certainty is essential for growth

Bangladesh’s 2026 rooftop solar package is a welcome effort to create demand and reward consumers who supply surplus electricity to the grid. It recognises that solar can help diversify the power mix and reduce reliance on costly imported fuels. Yet its impact will depend on more than the purchase tariff. Investors need to know that revenues can justify capital costs and risks, that rules will be applied consistently, and that projects can be completed and connected on time.

The country’s broader energy plans also matter. If the government intends to add more coal-based power plants and LNG terminals, it sends a mixed signal to solar investors. It may suggest that the long-term strategy remains centred on fossil fuels, even as the government offers incentives for renewables. That ambiguity can weaken confidence in the durability of solar support.


1791416539156.webp

Rooftop solar can ease pressure on the national grid, but high upfront costs and uncertain returns remain barriers to investment. Photo: Star.

This tension is especially significant in a country with excess generation capacity, where consumers already face high electricity prices driven partly by capacity charges. New generating assets may add to system costs even when they are not fully used. Expanding solar is therefore not only a matter of offering an incentive; it is also a question of whether planning, procurement and grid policy consistently favour least-cost and reliable options.

The three-year Tk 10.50 tariff and limited eligibility period may help some consumers install rooftop systems, but they may not be enough to trigger growth at scale. A stronger policy would combine fair compensation with longer-term predictability, efficient approvals, transparent grid-access rules and a credible plan for integrating renewable energy into future power planning. Policy certainty is essential. Without it, even a promising incentive may fail to turn solar potential into a significant investment.

Dr Moshahida Sultana is an energy researcher and Associate Professor in the Department of Accounting at the University of Dhaka.​
 

Stabilising domestic oil prices
Faizul Latif Chowdhury 08 October, 2026, 00:00

1791417888259.webp



THERE is no arguing that the government is currently caught in a severe macroeconomic impasse. The escalation of regional geopolitical conflicts has driven international petroleum, oil and lubricants prices upward, exhausting foreign currency reserves and exacerbating domestic inflation. Concurrently, critically low domestic revenue collection limits the government’s capacity to offer any further fiscal relief.

The current 25.9 per cent cumulative ad valorem (percentage-based) tax structure on fuel imports compounds this crisis by creating a ‘passive windfall’ for the National Board of Revenue at the direct expense of the consumer. As global import prices spike, the absolute tax collected per litre automatically balloons, feeding a destructive domestic inflation loop. Tis may be discontinued right away.

A structurally neutral, counter-cyclical alternative is abolishing the ad valorem architecture at the port, and replacing it with a specific duty, meaning flat-rate tariff per litre in the taka. This transition untethers the state budget from international volatility, provides predictable revenue for sovereign debt service, protects the productive economy (agriculture and mass transit) from hyper-inflation and simplifies customs administration at the Chittagong port.

Bangladesh’s fiscal policy space is heavily constrained by structural vulnerabilities. It is difficult to hold NBR responsible for the widening revenue deficit. The country possesses one of the lowest tax-to-GDP ratios in South Asia, leaving no room to simply cut taxes without violating fiscal sustainability and international financing safeguards.

The current 25.9 per cent import tax structure is calculated sequentially, meaning taxes multiply upon other taxes rather than applying as flat fees. First, customs duty is collected at the rate of 6.0 per cent on the ‘assessable value’ at port of entry. Then import VAT is calculated at the rate of 15 per cent, based on the duty-paid value (assessable value plus customs duty).

Thirdly, advance tax is realised at the rate of 2.0 per cent. This causes upfront liquidity pull. No one clearly understands the logic behind introducing advance tax, over and above advance income tax.

Finally, advance income tax is collected at the rate of 2.0 per cent, to be adjusted later.

Altogether, the incidence turns out to be 25.9 per cent. When the international cost of refined diesel stands at an assessable value of Tk 70.00 per litre, the NBR bags Tk 37.00 per litre in cumulative duties. If global disruptions drive the assessable value up to Tk 90.00 per litre, the 25.9 per cent progressive structure automatically forces the tax collection to surge to Tk 47.00 per litre. No customs officer can claim credit for this additional collection.

This passive state profit acts as an aggressive, regressive consumption tax. To mitigate the shock, the Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) is forced to run steep commercial deficits or pass the costs onto the refuel stations, stunting sluggish investments and raising transport and irrigation costs.

In this context, we propose replacing the multi-tiered percentage calculation with a single, statutory flat BDT rate assessed purely against the physical volume of fuel unloaded at the port. The ministry of finance should abolish the percentage-based customs duty, VAT, advance tax, and advance income tax system on fuel imports, replacing it with a singular, uniform specific duty denominated in fixed taka per physical litre at port of entry. Based on average historical revenue generation, the optimal baseline is proposed as follows:

(a) High-speed diesel and furnace oil: A flat, immutable Tk 35.00 per imported litre.

(b) Octane and petrol: A flat, immutable Tk 45.00 per imported litre.

Under this scheme, customs officers will calculate state revenue based entirely on physical volume unloaded from vessels rather than volatile international monetary valuation invoices.

The first layer of the proposed reform would be to eliminate the 6 per cent customs duty, 15 per cent VAT on duty-paid value, 2 per cent advance tax, and 2 per cent advance income tax on energy imports.

The second step should be to put in place and institutionalise a flat tariff of Tk 35.00 per litre for diesel (the primary driver of the productive economy) and Tk 45.00 per litre for octane/petrol at the import stage.

As the third step, the Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation should be declared fully exempt from upfront advance tax and advance income tax liquidity obligations, instantly freeing up state-level foreign exchange capacity.

Transitioning to a volumetric specific duty structure provides the National Board of Revenue with critical leverage to stabilise the broader macroeconomy without compromising structural fiscal discipline. Needless to emphasise that it will enhance sovereign fiscal credibility of the business scenario. On the other hand, by establishing a guaranteed, floor revenue of Tk 35.00 per imported litre, the NBR guarantees a reliable stream of non-devaluing domestic cash. This ensures the treasury can comfortably meet high domestic debt service liabilities without relying on inflationary central bank money printing.

This will reign in the inflationary feedback loop due to uncontrollable rise of petroleum in the international market. Because diesel drives mass passenger transit, commercial logistics and agricultural irrigation (powering water pumps across rural grids), any increase in its cost has an immediate multiplier effect on the consumer price index and food security. A flat BDT tax stops the tax architecture from artificially inflating these essential sectors during global energy shocks.

Exempting the BPC from upfront advance collections removes unnecessary internal administrative bottlenecks. It prevents the state from efficiently choking its own energy supply chain’s liquidity, helping preserve scarce foreign currency reserves for international settlement rather than tying it up in internal tax escrow accounts.

Will this be a freeze on the collection of customs duty from imported petroleum, oil and lubricants? This is certainly a relevant question for the government exchequer. The answer is yes. The amount collected at the port of entry will not change unless there is an increase in import volume. Historically the import of petroleum, oil and lubricants has increased every year since the birth of Bangladesh.

Let us not forget that instituting a flat-rate specific duty, replacing the ad valorem one, will eliminate passive windfalls, allowing the retail pump price to remain significantly closer to the actual cost of fuel. Budgetary revenue becomes a direct function of physical consumption volume, ensuring steady funds for the government exchequer. At the port, the customs officials will simply verify the physical volume unloaded from the tanker and apply the flat multiplier, and the clearance procedure will be truly simplified. The Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation will know in advance how much will be the duty liability at the port. The government will not be forced to deploy massive universal subsidies to shield consumers against international price hike. The new system will put in place a clean domestic retail pricing while ring-fencing treasury baseline in a transparent way. Good governance does not need windfall gain in revenue owing to international price hike.

Faizul Latif Chowdhury teaches economics and business at the Independent University Bangladesh.​
 

Solar power cheaper than oil and coal, focus shifts to solar

Mohiuddin
Dhaka

1791504131677.webp

Solar panels installed on the roof of Jorargonj Bouddha High School in Mirsarai, Chattogram Prothom Alo

A 100-megawatt solar power plant was commissioned in Bhabanipur, Pabna, in 2024. The plant was built on 400 acres of land on the vast sandy char of the Padma River. During the day, the plant supplies solar-generated electricity to the national grid.

As rising global prices of fuel oil and gas and supply shortages have made it increasingly difficult and costly to operate the country’s fossil fuel-based power plants, the solar power plant on the Padma char is supplying electricity to people. Solar power does not require fuel imports using foreign currency, nor does it cause air pollution. It is also relatively cheaper.

The Bhabanipur solar power plant was developed by Paramount Group. Under a 20-year power purchase agreement signed with the company in 2021, the price of electricity is 11.5 US cents per unit, equivalent to around Tk 13 at present. By contrast, the cost of electricity from furnace oil-fired power plants is more than Tk 28 per unit. The cost of coal-fired power is around Tk 15 per unit. Coal also carries the risk of environmental pollution.

On the other hand, during the tenure of the Awami League government, which was ousted in the July mass uprising, approvals for solar power plants were granted without competitive tenders. Equipment for solar power plants was also more expensive at the time.

As a result, electricity prices were higher. After the fall of the Awami League government, the interim government invited tenders and was able to sign contracts for solar power at less than Tk 8 per unit. This shows that solar power is cheaper than electricity generated from coal and oil.

Despite these advantages, Bangladesh remains behind in renewable energy. During the Awami League government’s 15-and-a-half-year rule, one power plant after another was built relying on fossil fuels.

Renewable energy, however, did not receive sufficient attention. Towards the end of the Awami League government’s tenure, some greater emphasis was placed on solar power amid growing difficulties in the sector.

Between 2010 and 2023, around $30 billion was invested in the power sector, equivalent to Tk 3.7 trillion at current prices. Only 3.3 per cent of that investment went to renewable energy.
According to data from the Bangladesh Power Development Board (PDB), contracts were signed for the construction of a total of 136 power plants during the Awami League government’s tenure, most of them based on fossil fuels.

The country’s total power generation capacity now stands at 28,347 megawatts.

Of this, 19 power plants based on renewable energy sources—solar, hydro and wind—have a combined generation capacity of 1,089 megawatts.

Only 4 per cent of the total electricity connected to the grid comes from renewable sources. PDB data show that renewable energy accounted for 2.58 per cent of power generation capacity in fiscal year 2012–13.

However, according to data from the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA), many companies and organisations generate electricity from rooftop solar systems and feed it into the grid.

As a result, a total of 1,492 megawatts of electricity from renewable sources is currently connected to the grid. Even taking this figure into account, renewable energy accounts for only 5 per cent of total power generation capacity.

The target was to generate 10 per cent of the country’s total electricity from renewable sources by 2021. That target was not achieved. The deadline was later extended to 2025, but that target was also missed because of inadequate investment in the sector.

Between 2010 and 2023, around $30 billion was invested in the power sector, equivalent to Tk 3.7 trillion at current prices. Only 3.3 per cent of that investment went to renewable energy.

The new BNP government is stepping up efforts to increase solar power generation and is offering various incentives to the sector.

State Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Anindya Islam Amit told Prothom Alo that the government is giving the highest priority to renewable energy. He said rooftop solar was being prioritised to rapidly increase power generation before next summer, so that people would not face the kind of hardship they experienced last summer.

Alongside rooftop solar, initiatives have been taken to build power plants on government land through partnerships. He said there is strong interest among both domestic and foreign investors. The government has already approved a 442-megawatt solar power plant at the site designated for a coal-fired power plant in Rampal, Bagerhat.

Solar power gets a boost amid crisis

The Awami League government built one power plant after another, relying on imported gas, coal and fuel oil. After the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022, energy prices in the global market rose sharply.

The target was to generate 10 per cent of the country’s total electricity from renewable sources by 2021. That target was not achieved. The deadline was later extended to 2025, but that target was also missed because of inadequate investment in the sector.
Foreign exchange reserves continued to decline as the country spent more to import fuel. The price of the dollar rose, as did the prices of electricity, gas and fuel oil in Bangladesh.

Despite having many power plants, people then had to endure load-shedding. In such circumstances, the government of the time was forced to place greater emphasis on renewable energy. Towards the end of the Awami League government’s tenure, consent letters were issued for 37 solar power plants.

In the process of building power plants, the government first issues a consent letter to an investor, followed by a power purchase agreement. The consent given to the 37 power plants towards the end of the Awami League government’s tenure was cancelled during the interim government’s term.

The stated reason was that the Awami League government had issued the consent letters without inviting tenders under the Special Provisions Act for the Quick Enhancement of Electricity and Energy Supply. The High Court repealed the special powers law on 14 November 2024. As a result, there was no scope to sign agreements with those plants.

On 18 November 2024, the Bangladesh Power Development Board (PDB) informed 31 companies by letter that it would not purchase any electricity from them. Between December and January, 15 companies filed 11 writ petitions with the High Court challenging the government decision. Meanwhile, the interim government invited tenders in several rounds and signed agreements for 11 solar power plants—seven on 25 January and four on 29 January. These plants have a combined generation capacity of 818 megawatts.

Since the new BNP government took office, tenders have so far been invited for the construction of 10 solar power plants. However, the deadline for submitting bids has been extended several times. As a result, it is not known how many bids have been submitted or which companies have expressed interest.

During the Awami League government’s tenure, sovereign guarantees were provided for foreign loans taken for power plants. The interim government scrapped the practice. Sources at the PDB and private power plants say foreign lenders are reluctant to provide loans without sovereign guarantees. There have also been difficulties in purchasing land for the past two years. The companies that have recently secured power plant projects have limited experience.

In addition, imports of power plant equipment have been disrupted by the war in the Middle East. Taken together, these factors mean there is little prospect of obtaining electricity from the newly contracted solar power plants within the next year or two.

Confidence Group won contracts to build three solar power plants after participating in tenders during the interim government’s tenure. Group Chairman Imran Karim told Prothom Alo that some problems had arisen over land purchases and bank financing. It could take until mid-2028 to begin generation. However, he said the new government was providing certain assurances for the projects, which would make financing easier.

According to PDB data, work is currently under way on 19 renewable energy-based power plants in the private sector, with a combined generation capacity of 1,042 megawatts. Six solar power plants are under construction in the public sector, with a combined capacity of 110 megawatts.

An agreement for one of these plants, with a capacity of 100 megawatts, was signed in 2023. During the interim government’s tenure, agreements were signed for five publicly owned plants with a combined solar generation capacity of 10 megawatts. In addition, a consent letter has been issued for a 100-megawatt solar power plant in Cox’s Bazar, and the agreement is under process.

Investors left in a difficult position

A report published by the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) in April said that if the 31 solar power plants whose consent letters were cancelled in the private sector had been implemented, they would have generated 3,287 megawatts of electricity and attracted $6 billion in investment. Fifteen of the companies had already purchased land. However, there were questions over the price at which electricity from those plants would be sold.

Sources in the Power Division said the average price of solar power under the 10 tenders conducted during the interim government’s tenure was 21 per cent lower than that of the power plants whose consent letters were cancelled.

The average price had previously been 10.47 US cents per unit, or around Tk 13. Following the tenders, it fell to an average of 8.27 cents, or slightly more than Tk 10. One agreement was signed at as low as 7.49 cents per unit, or slightly more than Tk 9.

After the consent letters were cancelled, Chinese companies also proposed renegotiating the price of electricity. The government, however, has yet to consider the proposal. The Ministry of Power did form a committee in May to review the claims of the cancelled solar and renewable energy projects. Little progress has been made by the committee so far.

People familiar with the matter say some of the cancelled power plants could be contracted after negotiating lower prices. This would make it possible to obtain solar power quickly.

For example, two plants—a 50-megawatt facility in Dimla, Nilphamari, and a 100-megawatt facility in Dinajpur—could begin commercial generation within next year if necessary. Everything needed for the two plants had already been completed, and even draft power purchase agreements had been prepared. However, work came to a halt after their consent letters were cancelled.

Sources said the cancelled power plants involved investment from several countries. One of the investors was among China’s top five power companies. It had received consent for two power plants with a combined capacity of 150 megawatts. In addition, agreements for several more plants with a combined capacity of 600 megawatts were at an advanced stage of negotiation, including a 200-megawatt floating solar power plant. Some companies, unable to invest in Bangladesh, have instead invested in the Philippines and Vietnam over the past two years. The Chinese company is also working on a $7 billion investment plan in Indonesia.

Several officials associated with the cancelled power plants told Prothom Alo on condition of anonymity that if fresh tenders were invited, the plants would not begin generation for another five years.

Instead, they said, the government could quickly scrutinise the cancelled projects and allow genuine investors whose plants had made sufficient progress to proceed.

On the matter, State Minister Anindya Islam Amit said some of the projects whose consent letters had been cancelled had already made progress. He said the government was reviewing which power plants had genuinely secured projects in compliance with the rules and made investments, with a view to bringing them into generation.

Experiences of Three Countries

In 2006, neighbouring India brought renewable energy under a separate institutional framework by establishing the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy.

According to a statement issued by the country’s Press Information Bureau (PIB) on 8 April, renewable energy meets 51.5 per cent of India’s 203 gigawatts of electricity demand.

Vietnam had only 86 megawatts of solar power capacity in 2018. By the end of 2025, that figure had risen to more than 19,000 megawatts. Pakistan has also made significant progress in solar power. As electricity prices rose sharply in the country, many people began installing rooftop solar systems.

Grid-connected rooftop solar capacity has surpassed 6,000 megawatts. Various sources, however, say the actual amount of rooftop solar power is several times higher, as much of it is not connected to the grid and is used directly by consumers.

Potential in Bangladesh

The current government has announced a target of generating 10,000 megawatts of electricity from renewable energy by 2030. People familiar with the sector say the target is achievable. Import duties on equipment for solar power plants have already been reduced to 1 per cent.

The government has also introduced substantial incentives for rooftop solar power. It will purchase rooftop electricity at Tk 10.50 per unit, creating considerable interest in the market. Alongside rooftop systems, the government now needs to accelerate the construction of large-scale solar power plants on land. It has planned to allocate government land for solar power plants through public-private partnerships.

Experts say electricity can be generated from renewable sources at a lower cost than from nuclear power plants. Building a nuclear power plant can take 10 to 12 years, whereas a solar power plant can be built within one and a half years.

Land acquisition, however, remains a major challenge. Bangladesh has around 3.6 million acres of khas land and 1.8 million acres of non-agricultural land. Of this land, there is an opportunity to use 30,000 acres of char land to generate 10,000 megawatts of solar power. The PDB also owns around 6,000 acres of land that could be used to build solar power plants.

The cost of generating solar power is also declining. An investment of around $35 million is required to build a 50-megawatt power plant. The investment can be recovered within six to seven years.

Khondaker Golam Moazzem, president of the Knowledge Hub Institute, told Prothom Alo that the government’s efforts to promote small-scale solar power generation, starting with rooftop systems, were encouraging.

Some private-sector companies are also generating solar power on the rooftops of industrial facilities. However, he said, the construction of large-scale solar power plants needs to be accelerated.

He said the government should quickly submit the report of the committee formed to evaluate the power plants cancelled by the interim government. If necessary, he added, appropriate foreign companies could be given an opportunity to proceed after negotiating an agreement on electricity prices.​
 

Govt secures $3.1b loan to keep fuel and LNG flowing

Indicative interest rate is about 5.38%

Star Business Report

1791591126715.webp


Bangladesh has secured a $3.1 billion non-concessional loan to finance fuel oil and liquefied natural gas imports, as the government moves to safeguard energy supplies from disruption.

The Standing Committee on Non-Concessional Loan -- the body responsible for approving commercial-rate foreign borrowing -- formally approved the facility on Wednesday, according to finance ministry officials.

The financing comes from the Jeddah-based International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation (ITFC), the trade-finance arm of the Islamic Development Bank Group.

The loan is split between the two state-owned energy companies. The Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation will use $2.5 billion to import fuel oil, while Petrobangla will use $600 million to purchase LNG.

The deal is structured as co-financing. ITFC will provide $600 million from its own resources, while Bangladesh Bank will provide the remaining $2.5 billion, or about 80 percent of the total.

The loan carries an interest rate of six-month term SOFR plus 1.70 percentage points, along with an annual administrative fee of 0.20 percent. Officials said the margin is 0.05 percentage points lower than last year’s.

Based on the six-month SOFR rate of 3.68 percent on October 1, the indicative interest rate is about 5.38 percent.

Each drawdown must be repaid in full in a single payment after six months. As the loan is expected to be rolled over at the end of each period, the central bank’s outstanding exposure would be about $195 million at any one time, according to a committee document.

The exposure could rise to a maximum of $1.25 billion if repayments were delayed.

To ensure uninterrupted fuel imports, the committee’s chair cleared the proposal on an urgent basis, following which the full committee approved it.

The two sides reached a preliminary agreement on the financing amounts at a negotiation meeting on June 29.

Bangladesh classifies a loan as non-concessional when its grant element -- a measure of how far its terms are softer than market rates -- falls below 25 percent.

Such loans face tighter scrutiny under the government’s debt rules, which cap annual debt servicing on this type of borrowing at the lower of 10 percent of export earnings or 15 percent of revenue.​
 

Sustainable energy idea contest launched


1791676495964.webp


Sfuron, a national sustainable energy idea contest that invites university students and energy-sector professionals to pitch ideas for a sustainable energy future, has been launched this week.

Winners will receive prizes and present their ideas to development partners and investors.

The contest invites university students and energy-sector professionals to put forward practical ideas for a sustainable energy future. It is anchored in the National Renewable Energy Development Strategy Paper (RESP) 2026–2030, which sets a 10,450 MW renewable energy target by 2030 and aims to save 15% energy across households, industry and the commercial sector over the same period, against a 2026 baseline.

Organised by the Power Division of the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources in cooperation with the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA), the contest is implemented by GIZ in Bangladesh, on behalf of German Development Cooperation and the European Union.

Submissions are invited under two categories.

The Renewable Energy track looks for ideas that can help the country reach its 10,450 MW electricity target, from rooftop solar, grid modernisation and storage, increasing production of local solar panels and inverters, wind energy and land-efficient options such as agrivoltaics and floating solar.

The Energy Efficiency track calls for ideas that help cut energy use, including campus and community interventions, clean cooking, digital monitoring tools, efficient retrofits, behaviour change and policy proposals.

Students must enter as teams of two from any public or private university and any discipline. Professionals working in the power and energy sector can enter as individuals.

Every participant will be verified at application, and entries found to be unverified or fraudulent may be disqualified at any stage.

Participants register on the contest website and upload a written concept note along with a short pitch video of up to three minutes. The strongest ideas will be shortlisted to pitch live before a jury of experts.

Submissions are open from 8 to 25 October 2026, and winners will be recognised at an award ceremony.

Winners in each group will receive trophies, certificates and prizes to support their academic or professional journey, along with the chance to present their ideas to development partners, investors and financing institutions.

Anyone with an idea worth sharing can register and submit at Sustainable Energy Idea Contest 2026.​
 

Bangladesh, Algeria Discuss Potential MoUs on LNG, LPG


1791761480476.webp



Bangladesh and Algeria have discussed potential cooperation in liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as the two countries seek to expand bilateral ties in the energy sector.

The issue was discussed at a meeting between Bangladesh’s Minister for Power, Energy and Mineral Resources, Iqbal Hassan Mahmood, and Algeria’s Ambassador to Bangladesh, Dr Abdelouahab Saïdani, at the minister’s office in Dhaka on Sunday afternoon.

The discussions focused on potential memorandums of understanding (MoUs) on LNG and LPG cooperation, as well as preparations for the minister’s upcoming visit to Algeria.

The meeting also reaffirmed the two countries’ shared commitment to strengthening their longstanding bilateral relations, advancing mutual interests and expanding cooperation in the energy sector.

Secretary of the Energy and Mineral Resources Division (EMRD), Md. Ziaul Huq, was also present at the meeting.​
 

LPG users at traders’ mercy

Regulator fails to act: experts

Shahriar Azam . Dhaka


1791866478197.webp



Amid households’ continued struggle to secure liquefied petroleum gas despite paying prices far above government-fixed rates, sector experts and insiders have accused traders of holding consumers hostage during an acute energy crunch.

The crisis might deepen further. Because, LPG distributors on Monday announced a two-day nationwide strike on October 15 and 16, halting retail sales across Bangladesh to push for an increase in their commission from Tk 50 to Tk 150 per cylinder.

They have also demanded an end to alleged harassment by law enforcement agencies and measures to bring idle cylinders back into circulation, warning of tougher agitation if their demands are ignored.

M Shamsul Alam, energy adviser to the Consumers Association of Bangladesh, described the sector as an oligopoly run by a handful of private companies.

The vulnerability of the regulator, Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission, created this bottleneck, he said, warning that the regulatory framework has collapsed and the government retains virtually no grip on the retail market.

The BERC has failed to enforce its benchmark price, set without public hearings in breach of existing rules, since it began fixing prices five years ago.

At present, a standard 12kg LPG cylinder sells for up to Tk 2,400, against the regulated ceiling of Tk 1,837 for October.

Compounding the burden, some distributors have raised empty cylinder prices by about 50 percent over the past several months. This sharp run-up in cylinder costs illustrates how private suppliers wield arbitrary control over the retail supply chain.

Empty canisters from active suppliers are fetching steep premiums because other market key players – Bashundhara and Beximco – have struggled to import gas following the fall of the Sheikh Hasina administration in August 2024, when those same firms held dominant sway over the trade.

At Dipto Enterprise in Dhaka’s Panthapath, proprietor Ujjal Hossain said he was stocking only BM-branded 12kg cylinders at Tk 2,000. With BM supplying steady volumes into a dry market, the cost of its empty canister jumped from Tk 1,400 to Tk 2,200.

Conversely, empty canisters from stalled suppliers have seen their value drop. Used Bashundhara containers are selling for as low as Tk 800. For households forced to abandon an unavailable brand, obtaining a filled container from another distributor requires buying a new metal bottle, pushing total switching costs up to Tk 4,200.

Bashundhara LP Gas, which commanded a 15.5 percent share of total imports in FY2023, saw its intake drop to 5.19 percent in FY2024 and further down to 3.68 percent in FY2025. Md Redwanur Rahman, sales and marketing head at Bashundhara LP Gas, did not answer phone calls seeking comment on the decline.

Beximco LPG has experienced similar supply contractions due to restrictions in opening import letters of credit.

Following Hasina government’s fall, these groups ran into banking roadblocks and complications in opening LCs to secure shipments.

Because private operators use incompatible cylinder fittings and decline to refill rival containers, the collapse of these dominant brands has left consumers trapped.

National Board of Revenue statistics indicate that LPG imports have held steady – 158,000 tonnes arrived in August, 156,000 tonnes in September, and 39,000 tonnes during the first 11 days of October.

Annual imports have also expanded consistently, rising from 1.223 million tonnes in 2023 to 1.442 million tonnes in 2024 and 1.447 million tonnes in 2025.

More than 98 percent of Bangladesh’s LPG requirements are met through imports run by private companies.

After the government froze new residential piped gas links in 2015 to preserve declining domestic natural gas reserves, rapid urbanisation drove millions of households into the cylinder market.

Today, domestic kitchens account for roughly 80 percent of national LPG consumption, with commercial, transport, and industrial sectors taking up the remaining share.

The LPG market disruption is particularly severe across district centres.

In Rajshahi, local distributor association officials confirmed that dispatches from Bashundhara and Beximco – which together control nearly 60 percent of the regional market – have dried up entirely.

Momotaj Begum, a resident in Rajshahi, said the ban on exchanging empty cylinders across brands has heavily increased monthly family expenses, forcing many households to buy rival canisters at exorbitant rates or shift to electric induction cookers.

In Bogura, LPG Traders Cooperative Association president Aslam Khan on Monday said Bashundhara supplies have remained halted for nearly a year, while deliveries from Delta and Orion stopped in late September.

Ahsanul Jabbar, secretary general of the LPG Operators Association of Bangladesh, cited steady import figures from the NBR to argue that primary suppliers were providing adequate quantities of LPG.

He accused downstream distributors of withholding stock to create artificial shortages and increase their profit margins.

However, dealers and retailers dispute that claim, countering that overheads, freight rates, and wages have escalated to the point where the Tk 50 statutory commission is no longer viable.

BERC chairman Jalal Ahmed dismissed requests to raise dealer commissions without statutory public hearings, adding that the commission formed an inspection team on Sunday to investigate the supply chain.

Shafiqul Alam, energy analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), said that industrial manufacturing units had increasingly turned to LPG over the past four to five years to bypass domestic natural gas shortfalls.

‘While national demand is rising by about 12 percent annually, imports have not grown fast enough to bridge the gap,’ he said.

With state authorities unable to police official prices, consumers remain caught between a fractured distribution network and corporate commercial tactics, bearing the cost of an essential utility left entirely to an unregulated market.​
 

Petrobangla extends offshore oil, gas bidding deadline to March 31, 2027


1791933310750.webp



Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation (Petrobangla) on Tuesday extended the deadline for submitting bids under the offshore oil and gas exploration and development tender by four months, pushing the final date from November 30 this year to March 31, 2027.

According to Petrobangla, the deadline was extended following recent discussions with and requests from several renowned international oil companies (IOCs).

Authorities hope that making data packages more accessible alongside this extended timeline will encourage greater participation from global energy firms in the current bidding round.

On May 24, Petrobangla officially invited international tenders for oil and gas exploration across 15 deep-sea blocks and 11 shallow-sea blocks.

The tender document is priced at $7,000, with options for bidders to submit proposals for specific individual blocks or the entire offshore region, said Petrobangla Director Engineer Md Shoyeb.

So far, three major entities, including Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO) and China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), have purchased the tender documents.

A previous bidding round initiated in March 2024 attracted interest from seven prominent international companies, including US-based ExxonMobil, with two firms purchasing data packages from Petrobangla.

However, due to political transitions and various other constraints, those companies ultimately refrained from submitting bids, leading to the cancellation of the 2024 round.

Following an evaluation by an inquiry committee formed by the last interim government, several key revisions were introduced to the Model Production Sharing Contract (PSC).

These include reductions in pipeline transport costs from the deep sea to the mainland, lowering the WPPF (Workers' Profit Participation Fund) share from 5 percent to 1.5 percent, and raising ceiling gas prices tied to Brent crude – setting the price up to $11 per thousand cubic feet for deep-sea blocks and $10.50 for shallow-water blocks, compared to fixed rates of $7.25 and $5.60 under the 2019 PSC.

Energy sector analysts point out that despite Bangladesh securing more than 118,813 square kilometres of maritime territory following favourable international verdicts against Myanmar in 2012 and India in 2014, exploration efforts in the Bay of Bengal have long remained sluggish.

With domestic gas production declining from a peak of nearly 2,800 million cubic feet per day (MMCFD) down to around 1,620 MMCFD against a daily demand estimated at 4,000 MMCFD and an authorised system load exceeding 5,356 MMCFD, the country continues to face a persistent supply deficit of roughly 1,400 MMCFD.

Officials expect that the revised terms and extended deadline will help revitalise foreign investment and alleviate the growing energy crunch impacting national industrial growth.​
 
Back
Top