Saif
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2024
- Messages
- 18,719
- Likes
- 8,678
- Nation

- Residence

- Axis Group

The moral argument against amnesty has to be nuanced and not absolute. It cannot be argued that black money per se is out of bounds of the formal economy. Benefit-cost analysis of taxing black money with a ceiling has to be compared with the scenario where it is kept out of the formal economy under all circumstances as a matter of policy. If the amount of money represented by the black economy is as big as even the most conservative estimate puts it, foregoing the tax revenue on this will mean a high opportunity cost that a cash strapped government can ill afford. Allied to this is the benefit of addition to investment in legal sectors. After the morality argument is taken care of satisfactorily, economic cost-benefit analysis of legalising black money should be front and centre of policy making. As of now very little by way of addressing the morality argument and pointing out the cost- benefit comparisons has been made by policy makers.
An economist of global repute while discussing morally as an ideology melded it with utility of utilitarianism and wrote: ' A society cannot exist unless its members have common feelings about what is the proper way of conducting its affairs'. (Joan Robinson, Economic Philosophy, 1963). Perhaps her words are as relevant today as they were when written.
An economist of global repute while discussing morally as an ideology melded it with utility of utilitarianism and wrote: ' A society cannot exist unless its members have common feelings about what is the proper way of conducting its affairs'. (Joan Robinson, Economic Philosophy, 1963). Perhaps her words are as relevant today as they were when written.