[🇵🇰] Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan:

Reply
G Pakistan Affairs
[🇵🇰] Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan:
Ghazi52
32
482
More threads by Ghazi52

Ghazi52

Ghazi52

The Legend
Moderator
112,648
305
Origin

Source : https://www.dawn.com/news/1861249/8-terrorists-killed-during-ibo-in-north-waziristan-ispr

Eight terrorists killed during IBO in North Waziristan​

Iftikhar Shirazi
September 26, 2024

Weapons and ammunition recovered from the terrorist after the IBO. — Photo provided by the author

Weapons and ammunition recovered from the terrorist after the IBO. — Photo provided by the author

Eight terrorists were killed after security forces conducted an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in the North Waziristan district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the military’s media affairs wing said on Thursday.

According to a press release issued by Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the operation was conducted last night on the “reported presence of terrorists in the area”.

The press release said that an intense exchange of fire took place between the security forces and Khawarij during the operation and, as a result, eight terrorists were “sent to hell”.

While it wasn’t mentioned in the statement which terrorist group was involved in the attack, in July, the government, through an official notification, designated the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as Fitna al Khawarij, while mandating all institutions to use the term khariji (outcast) when referring to the perpetrators of terrorist attacks on Pakistan.

Director General ISPR Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry had confirmed the same a month later.

“Weapons and ammunition were also recovered from the deceased terrorist, who remained actively involved in terrorist activities against security forces and targeted innocent civilians as well, the ISPR statement said in its press release today.

“Sanitisation of the area is being carried out to eliminate any other Kharji found in the area as security forces are determined to wipe out the menace of terrorism from the country,” it added.

Meanwhile, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi paid tribute to the security forces for killing terrorists.

According to a post on the interior ministry’s X account, Naqvi said that the security forces took timely action to eliminate the terrorists.

“Salute to the brave soldiers of the security force,” he said.

Pakistan has lately witnessed a sharp uptick in the number of attacks targeting security forces, other law enforcement agencies, and security checkpoints, particularly in Balochistan and KP.

Attacks escalated after the TTP broke a fragile ceasefire agreement with the government in 2022 and vowed to target security forces.

In August, three soldiers were martyred and five terrorists were killed after security forces foiled an infiltration attempt at the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in the province’s Bajaur district.

On September 6, four terrorists were killed when they tried to attack the Frontier Corps headquarters in KP’s Mohmand district.

On September 20, six soldiers were martyred while 12 terrorists were killed during two encounters in North and South Waziristan districts.
 
This KPK terror is completely out of control. We have a serious ethno-facist problem in FATA and it is not going away. Now its not even a jihadi issue anymore. Just pure hate fest.

How do you counter hateful terrorists now?

Used to be jihadist terrorists but now they are full on racist ethno-facist terrorists.
 
Last edited:
Vsdoc said:
Iranis are scum?

Why man?
Click to expand...
Current Persian political and military apparatus is.

People would hate me for it, but the Iran under Pehalvi dynasty was much much better in every sense.

Right now its a rabid mullah regime hell bent on getting its people killed and poking its neighbours due to a mix of their incompetence, religious fervourism and martyr syndrome.
 
steppeWolff said:
Current Persian political and military apparatus is.

People would hate me for it, but the Iran under Pehalvi dynasty was much much better in every sense.

Right now its a rabid mullah regime hell bent on getting its people killed and poking its neighbours due to a mix of their incompetence, religious fervourism and martyr syndrome.
Click to expand...

Really surprised to hear a Muslim Pakistani say that.
 
Vsdoc said:
Really surprised to hear a Muslim Pakistani say that.
Click to expand...
Doc, I believe in judging regimes based on their actions, not just their religious or ideological labels. The Pehlavi era had its flaws, but under it, Iran was a stable, and rapidly modernizing nation with strong global ties. Today, the IRI’s policies whether crushing dissent at home, fueling conflicts abroad, or mismanaging the economy have brought immense suffering to ordinary Iranians.

My criticism isn’t about religion; it’s about the regime’s oppressive governance and reckless foreign policy. And let’s be honest whatever limited support Pakistan maintains for Iran is purely out of strategic necessity, not admiration. Since the Revolution, Iran has been hostile to Pakistan, whether through backing Baloch insurgents, fueling violence in Karachi in the 1990s, or cozying up to India at our expense. Many Pakistanis see this clearly, just as many Iranians despise their own regime’s failures.

Anyways, we are venturing far off topic now.
 
steppeWolff said:
Doc, I believe in judging regimes based on their actions, not just their religious or ideological labels. The Pehlavi era had its flaws, but under it, Iran was a stable, and rapidly modernizing nation with strong global ties. Today, the IRI’s policies whether crushing dissent at home, fueling conflicts abroad, or mismanaging the economy have brought immense suffering to ordinary Iranians.

My criticism isn’t about religion; it’s about the regime’s oppressive governance and reckless foreign policy. And let’s be honest whatever limited support Pakistan maintains for Iran is purely out of strategic necessity, not admiration. Since the Revolution, Iran has been hostile to Pakistan, whether through backing Baloch insurgents, fueling violence in Karachi in the 1990s, or cozying up to India at our expense. Many Pakistanis see this clearly, just as many Iranians despise their own regime’s failures.

Anyways, we are venturing far off topic now.
Click to expand...
It not off topic at all. To discuss the regime and politics and foreign relations of a nation that shape conflicts. And the response of international players. No nation is an island.

The Pahlavis were western plants. Oil was discovered. And Pahlavi Iran was no different to today's Saudi Arabia in terms of sovereignty.

The revolution was hijacked by Islamic hardliners.

The revolution was not wrong.

The same reason the Pahlavi son in exile being planted back in Iran by the west is never going to succeed.

In the end Iran is going to be broken and violently splintered and open for oil rapine just like all the other fallen middle eastern regimes.

Forgive me if as Zoroastrian Persian I do not wish that on my ancestral land and people.
 
Vsdoc said:
It not off topic at all. To discuss the regime and politics and foreign relations of a nation that shape conflicts. And the response of international players. No nation is an island.

The Pahlavis were western plants. Oil was discovered. And Pahlavi Iran was no different to today's Saudi Arabia in terms of sovereignty.

The revolution was hijacked by Islamic hardliners.

The revolution was not wrong.

The same reason the Pahlavi son in exile being planted back in Iran by the west is never going to succeed.

In the end Iran is going to be broken and violently splintered and open for oil rapine just like all the other fallen middle eastern regimes.

Forgive me if as Zoroastrian Persian I do not wish that on my ancestral land and people.
Click to expand...
Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh
 
steppeWolff said:
Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.
Click to expand...

The exact same can be said about the British in undivided India.

Bottom line was that they were planted in place of Mossadegh to get the oil.
 
steppeWolff said:
Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh
Click to expand...

Whatever change has to come to Iran, has got to be organic and driven by Iranians.

It is their country.

The US is no one.
 
steppeWolff said:
Doc, you raise valid concerns about foreign interference and the tragic fate of many Middle Eastern nations, no one wants to see Iran broken or exploited. But let’s be clear: The Pahlavis, for all their flaws, were not mere ‘Western plants.’ They built institutions, drove industrialization, and maintained a degree of sovereignty that allowed Iran to be a regional power, not a proxy battlefield. Comparing them to modern Saudi Arabia oversimplifies history; Iran under the Shah had its own agency, even as it aligned with the West during the Cold War.

As for the Revolution, its original ideals whether democratic, nationalist, or even religious were indeed hijacked by hardliners, and the result has been catastrophic for ordinary Iranians. The Islamic Republic’s policies have isolated Iran economically, radicalized its politics, and turned it into a pariah state all while claiming to resist ‘imperialism.’ Yet today, Iran’s regime fuels conflicts abroad and represses its people at home, making it vulnerable to the very foreign exploitation you fear.

No one wants chaos for Iran. But the current regime’s trajectory, militarization, isolation, and internal repression is what risks fracturing the country, not nostalgia for the past. A stable, sovereign Iran would need a government that prioritizes its people over ideology and regional adventurism. As a Pakistani, I’ve seen how the Islamic Republic’s actions have harmed my country too. That’s not anti-Iranian sentiment, it’s a critique of a regime that has failed its own citizens and its neighbors alike.

That being said, the current scion of the Pehlavi dynasty looks like a village idiot compared to his father. On top of that, he's a proven cuck. What a fall eh
Click to expand...
Problem though is that the GCC k bhungi all agreed to suck dick along with the turkiyan guppu people too. All their money is deposited in the west and they are only allowed to buy junk eff-sola or third class Chinese weapons which don’t even work bhai. Then big western corporations enter the fray and take up all infrastructure work and suck up all the remaining cash too. The 1000 dalit princes are allowed to have some money for hookers and partying and the Turks allowed to sell liquor and cater to western tourists on budget travel packages. Hendu-Pak slave labor erects tall buildings and keeps streets clean so as long as population is low in the GCC.

Hamain Pakistan main to Kuchh nahi mila ye sub kar k……our country is not even livable anymore due to security reasons.

Iran cannot agree to slavery like the other dalit countries have accepted.

Iranians will hang anyone who accepts slavery as the path forward as suggested by trump sahb.
 
Vsdoc said:
The exact same can be said about the British in undivided India.

Bottom line was that they were planted in place of Mossadegh to get the oil.
Click to expand...
The British in India were colonial occupiers, an outright foreign power extracting resources and suppressing local sovereignty for 200 years. The Pehlavis, for all their faults and ties to the West, were an Iranian dynasty that modernized the country, expanded education, and maintained independence in foreign policy, something Mossadegh himself acknowledged when he served as Prime Minister under the Shah.

Yes, the 1953 coup replaced Mossadegh to secure Western oil interests but that doesn’t negate the fact that the Shah’s Iran was still a functioning state with growing infrastructure, universities, and global ties. Compare that to today’s Islamic Republic; a regime that has turned Iran into an international pariah, gutted its economy through incompetence and sanctions, and spends billions on proxies while Iranians starve. If resisting imperialism means making your own people poorer, less free, and more isolated than under a monarchy, then the Revolution has failed on its own terms.

The real tragedy is that Iran today is more vulnerable to foreign exploitation than ever and not because of the Pehlavis, but because the regime’s brutality and adventurism have left it with few allies and a collapsing economy. If you want to prevent Iran’s oil rapine, then the first step is rejecting a government that prioritizes ideological zeal over national survival.

Note: I am in no way a monarchy supporter. I am a critic of the current IRI regime, compared to it, even the Monarchy looks good.
 
Lulldapull said:
Problem though is that the GCC k bhungi all agreed to suck dick along with the turkiyan guppu people too. All their money is deposited in the west and they are only allowed to buy junk eff-sola or third class Chinese weapons which don’t even work bhai. Then big western corporations enter the fray and take up all infrastructure work and suck up all the remaining cash too. The 1000 dalit princes are allowed to have some money for hookers and partying and the Turks allowed to sell liquor and cater to western tourists on budget travel packages. Hendu-Pak slave labor erects tall buildings and keeps streets clean so as long as population is low in the GCC.

Hamain Pakistan main to Kuchh nahi mila ye sub kar k……our country is not even livable anymore due to security reasons.

Iran cannot agree to slavery like the other dalit countries have accepted.

Iranians will hang anyone who accepts slavery as the path forward as suggested by trump sahb.
Click to expand...
Okay. Let’s separate the chaff from wheat and the slogans from reality.

The GCC states have transactional relationships with the West but do not pretend that Iran’s "resistance" model has brought prosperity or sovereignty either. Unlike the Gulf, Iran has:

A crumbling currency, with the rial among the world’s worst performing.
A brain drain of millions of educated Iranians fleeing repression.
An economy strangled by sanctions, not because of slavery’l but because the regime prioritizes missiles over markets and proxies over people.

The Gulf monarchies may be flawed, but their people have infrastructure, jobs, and relative stability. Meanwhile, Iranians queue for bread, sell kidneys to survive, and get shot protesting for basic rights. If that’s resistance, then it’s a resistance that only benefits the mullah regime and not the ordinary Iranians.

As for Pakistan, our problems are self-inflicted too but at least we don’t pretend ANYMORE that starving our own people while funding foreign militias is some kind of defiance.

The IRI’s biggest failure is turning Iran, a civilization with 3,000 years of history, into a glorified garrison state.
 
steppeWolff said:
The British in India were colonial occupiers, an outright foreign power extracting resources and suppressing local sovereignty for 200 years. The Pehlavis, for all their faults and ties to the West, were an Iranian dynasty that modernized the country, expanded education, and maintained independence in foreign policy, something Mossadegh himself acknowledged when he served as Prime Minister under the Shah.

Yes, the 1953 coup replaced Mossadegh to secure Western oil interests but that doesn’t negate the fact that the Shah’s Iran was still a functioning state with growing infrastructure, universities, and global ties. Compare that to today’s Islamic Republic; a regime that has turned Iran into an international pariah, gutted its economy through incompetence and sanctions, and spends billions on proxies while Iranians starve. If resisting imperialism means making your own people poorer, less free, and more isolated than under a monarchy, then the Revolution has failed on its own terms.

The real tragedy is that Iran today is more vulnerable to foreign exploitation than ever and not because of the Pehlavis, but because the regime’s brutality and adventurism have left it with few allies and a collapsing economy. If you want to prevent Iran’s oil rapine, then the first step is rejecting a government that prioritizes ideological zeal over national survival.

Note: I am in no way a monarchy supporter. I am a critic of the current IRI regime, compared to it, even the Monarchy looks good.
Click to expand...
I am not a Shah supporter. Even though under the Shah Parsis were almost on the brink of moving back to Iranian soil.

Not permanently. But initially as industries and townships. Who knows what after that.

I am definitely not a Mulla supporter. That much is obvious to anyone who knows vsdoc.
 
steppeWolff said:
Okay. Let’s separate the chaff from wheat and the slogans from reality.

The GCC states have transactional relationships with the West but do not pretend that Iran’s "resistance" model has brought prosperity or sovereignty either. Unlike the Gulf, Iran has:

A crumbling currency, with the rial among the world’s worst performing.
A brain drain of millions of educated Iranians fleeing repression.
An economy strangled by sanctions, not because of slavery’l but because the regime prioritizes missiles over markets and proxies over people.

The Gulf monarchies may be flawed, but their people have infrastructure, jobs, and relative stability. Meanwhile, Iranians queue for bread, sell kidneys to survive, and get shot protesting for basic rights. If that’s resistance, then it’s a resistance that only benefits the mullah regime and not the ordinary Iranians.

As for Pakistan, our problems are self-inflicted too but at least we don’t pretend ANYMORE that starving our own people while funding foreign militias is some kind of defiance.

The IRI’s biggest failure is turning Iran, a civilization with 3,000 years of history, into a glorified garrison state.
Click to expand...
GCC k dalit are few million sitting on huge oil n gas and totally governed by the west. Trump just went over there and snatched $5.6 trillion from them. Dunya bhar ka slave labor working for a pittance doing the hard yards. Of course they got it good. They are owned and operated by the west as colonial outposts. AL-Turkiya is a Muslim rundi khana where they like I said custom tailored for budget tour deals for the poorer EU crowd. That’s their economy bhai, same in poor old egypt sub saalay hand to mouth dalit k bachay. These are not countries. These are all Muslim colonies under western administrative control. In ka koi future nahi hae bhai. I don’t believe they can even stand on their own.

Iranis despite sanctions got 80 million population with a per capita of $8000. They have good education good medical reasonable infrastructure despite sanctions.

In our country bhai we are on a $3 dollar a day survival mode. Hum to bhookay murr rahay hain. We are truly in dire straits. Our future is seriously up in the air where we can literally disintegrate any moment. Bohot he bura haal hae. I don’t see us making it thru these tough times.

Now our military has been humiliated too and it was a real body blow. I’m actually worried now.

Iran is multiple levels better off than us in every imaginable metric and they actually do have a shot at being a great country.
 
Lulldapull said:
Iranis are all totally secular. Nobody goes to prayer or worship completely like western countries. Pakistanis are AL-Qaeda people compared to iranis.
Click to expand...
Being "secular" (actually atheist or at best agnostic) is a shitty place to be in for such a proud race which gave the world its oldest religion.

Its a place which will have Jew and Christian vultures descending on.

That is absolutely not acceptable.
 
Vsdoc said:
Being "secular" (actually atheist or at best agnostic) is a shitty place to be in for such a proud race which gave the world its oldest religion.

Its a place which will have Jew and Christian vultures descending on.

That is absolutely not acceptable.
Click to expand...
EU ko dekh lo bhai……I lived in Australia for a decade and if your colleagues found out you went to church, then you were ostracized at work for being low IQ.

The atheist Jew has influenced western society and it’s caught on in Iran too no?
 
Lulldapull said:
EU ko dekh lo bhai……I lived in Australia for a decade and if your colleagues found out you went to church, then you were ostracized at work for being low IQ.

The atheist Jew has influenced western society and it’s caught on in Iran too no?
Click to expand...
I have had this discussion too many times ro count bro with overseas clueless Iranis.

They look at us as some sort of fundamentalist mullas or rabbis. But Zarathushti.
 
Vsdoc said:
I have had this discussion too many times ro count bro with overseas clueless Iranis.

They look at us as some sort of fundamentalist mullas or rabbis. But Zarathushti.
Click to expand...
Vohi baat hae na bhai........anything western is Hollywood.......aur apnay khud k log lund pe charrhain.

Its an incurable disease.

The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

Worked with many Irani engineers over the years and its the same story......you ask em that why did you leave your country......its not like yous from a shiit-hole like Egypt or our poor ol Pakistan or Sudan or India......and the answer is always the same.......oh I too wanted that hollywood lifestyle......
 
Lulldapull said:
Vohi baat hae na bhai........anything western is Hollywood.......aur apnay khud k log lund pe charrhain.

Its an incurable disease.

The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

Worked with many Irani engineers over the years and its the same story......you ask em that why did you leave your country......its not like yous from a shiit-hole like Egypt or our poor ol Pakistan or Sudan or India......and the answer is always the same.......oh I too wanted that hollywood lifestyle......
Click to expand...
Sirji it is 1400 years of Islamic revisionism and denialism.

Where Zoroastrianism has been maligned and myths built around it.

Our libraries and texts burned and destroyed.

Our temples converted to mosques.

Their patron deities, gods and goddesses, given Islamic names and histories.

Right from being a messianic faith to being some sort of black sorcery (majoos is basically the genesis of magic) to being the original faith and word of God that was corrupted by power and empires and Emperors.

I've heard it all. I am but one man. I do not have a clue where to begin on an alien population of 60 million.
 
Bagheera0084 said:
But Waziristsn is in NWFP. Does NWFP too have links with Iran like Balochistan has?
Click to expand...
So as @Lulldapull and @steppeWolff have educated us in the recent past

Pashtuns (of NWFP, and Afghanistan too) are exerting an undue demographic and cultural change influence in Pakistan in non Pashtun areas.

Like Balochistan and Sindh, and I believe parts of southern Punjab too.

Balochistan is a huge pand area, and ethnic Baloch are very few. And are being replaced/displaced by Pashtuns from up north.

Its not necessarily all hostile either, cause the Pashtun and Baloch both being Iranic cultures. Annd both Sunni, there is significant amount of intermarrying as well. So land essentially changes hands with wedlock. Between both families and villages and tribes.
 
Last edited:

Baloch women blackmailed into becoming terrorists: arrested suicide bomber

Previous Thread

12 hurt as bomb targets police van in Quetta

Next Thread

Posts you haven't read yet..

Countries Latest Posts

Continent Latest Posts

Similar threads

Ghazi52
[🇵🇰] Bannu Police Station Attack, Five terrorists eliminated
Replies
3
Views
945
Ghazi52
Ghazi52
Ghazi52
[🇵🇰] Six army men martyred, as many TTP terrorists killed in North Waziristan IBO
Replies
3
Views
278
TheNewb77
T
Ghazi52
[🇵🇰] Security forces kill 6 BLA terrorists in Balochistan
Replies
2
Views
212
Sharma Ji
Sharma Ji

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

  • Home
  • Tube
  • Watch
    • Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2024 XenForo Ltd.
    Some of the add-ons on this site are powered by XenConcept™ ©2017-2025 XenConcept Ltd. (Details)
    test
    Xenforo Theme © by ©XenTR
    Back
    PKDefense - Recommended Toggle