[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Energy Security of Bangladesh
469
13K
More threads by Saif


Power sector managers need to ensure quality control
01 May, 2025, 00:00

THE absence of a quality control mechanism in the power sector has led to extra fuel costs in power generation. A recent Power Development Board analysis shows that some plants consume up to 90 per cent more fuel than others do. The finding indicates an overall power management failure in stopping the leak of the already scanty supplies of imported fuels. Experts say that factors such as the import and transport cost, the dollar exchange rate, plant factor and, especially, the quality of machines that contribute to varying degrees of fuel consumption, exist in the power sector. During the Awami League regime, when the power sector experienced a lopsided development, driven by an abnormally high overcapacity and an absurd capacity charge system, many party loyalists were rewarded with power projects without tender under the now-repealed indemnity law, with the power sector investors choosing their machines while quality control mechanisms did not exist. Independent power plants exploited the situation and brought used machines that led to the over-consumption of fuels and frequent shutdown of plants. The public power plants also used more fuels as they were poorly maintained. The scenario has not yet changed.

The frequent shutdowns of power plants, not only the old ones but also new ones, because of technical glitches show the absence of quality checks. For example, the first unit of the 1,320MW coal-fired Rampal plant, a Bangladesh-India joint venture, shut down eight times in the first nine months after it started running in December 2022. The plant, where per-unit fuel cost is 28 per cent higher than a similar power plant, was available for only 18 per cent of the time this January, according to the power board. Frequent shutdowns and resumptions of the plants require extra fuel. The fuel cost in the Tongi Power Plant is 47 per cent higher compared with the average cost of fuel in similar plants. Many other plants have continued to operate at a little fraction of their capacity. Among gas-based plants, as the power board analysis shows, the average fuel costs of public plants are about 20 per cent higher than that of independent power plants, largely because of old machines that have served out their economic life. So is the case with oil- and coal-based public power plants. Some independent power plants, including Adani and Summit’s, also have high fuel costs riding on unequal power deals.​
 

Bangladesh substantially reduces its outstanding dues to Adani
Dilip Jha, chief financial officer of the India-based company, tells Reuters
FE ONLINE DESK
Published :
May 02, 2025 18:13
Updated :
May 02, 2025 18:17

1746232814685.png


Bangladesh has substantially reduced its outstanding dues to India's Adani Power related to a power-supply deal, and the company is confident of recovering the roughly $900 million still remaining, its chief financial officer said.

According to Reuters, Bangladesh has struggled to pay its dues per the deal, signed in 2017, as imports got costly since the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 and amid the domestic political turmoil last August that led to the ouster of the country's prime minister.

As a result, Adani had halved supply last year but CFO Dilip Jha said the company has resumed full supply since as the country's monthly payments started covering some of the dues.

"We are supplying full power to Bangladesh ... the payment we are receiving now is more than the monthly billing," Jha said in a post-earnings call with analysts on Thursday.

"We are hopeful that not only will we continue to receive payments equivalent to the current month's billing, but that the old outstanding dues will also be liquidated."

The company said Bangladesh has paid nearly $1.2 billion of the roughly $2 billion totally billed to the country.​
 

Gas crisis in industries as supply increased in power sector
The supply of gas is lower than the demand. On top of that supply of gas to the power plants has been increased to cut down on load shedding.

Mohiuddin Dhaka
Published: 29 Apr 2025, 08: 41

1746236775946.png

Machineries at a dye factory remain idle due to gas crisis. Photo taken in BCIC Industrial Estate in Fatullah, Narayanganj. Prothom Alo

The demand for electricity is at its highest during summer. When production of electricity cannot meet the demand, there has to be power load shedding. The government this time, however, has been trying to limit the load shedding.

So, the electricity generation has been increased to keep the supply of electricity uninterrupted. To maintain this production, the supply of gas has been increased in the electricity sector, cutting down on the supply of that to the industrial and residential sectors.

Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation (Petrobangla) sources say that the daily demand of gas in the country stands at 3.8 billion (380 crore) cubic feet. The demand can somewhat be met when there’s a supply of 3 billion (300 crore) cubic feet. Then the situation is managed by rationing (by reducing the supply in one sector and increasing in another).

At present there is a supply of 2.7 billion (270 crore) cubic feet. Of that, 1.05 billion (105 crore) cubic feet is being supplied to the power plants.

The power sector is now considered with highest priority. As a result, the gas crisis has widened for the residential and industrial clients.

The largest gas distribution company, Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution, supplies gas to Dhaka, Gazipur, Mymensingh and Narayanganj regions.

Officials of this company say that their daily demand is 1.9 billion (190 crore) cubic feet. Currently, they are receiving about 1.52 to 1.53 billion (152 to 153 crore) cubic feet.

During times of such supply before, they could provide a maximum of 230 million (23 crore) cubic feet to the power sector. Now they have to provide 360 to 370 million (36 to 37 crore) cubic feet in this sector. This has created a shortage of 130 to 140 million (13 to 14 crore) cubic feet in the industrial and residential sectors. There is a shortage of gas in the industry even during the normal times. Now it has increased even more.

Even though the industrial customers pay higher prices, the power sector has to be prioritised in gas supply. Two more cargoes of LNG ships would have to be imported to meet the demand.
Director of operations and mines at the Petrobangla, Md Rafiqul Islam told Prothom Alo that the supply of gas to the power sector has been increased and this has created a bit of shortage. Local gas production might increase a bit within a day or two.

The idea of increasing LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) import is also being pondered upon, he added.

The country once produced 2.7 billion (270 crore) cubic feet of gas every day. Then the LNG import started in 2018 when the production started declining. The daily production has now dropped to 1.84 billion (184 crore) cubic feet.

Though the LNG import has increased than before, it is still not sufficient. About 800 to 850 million (80 to 85 crore) cubic feet of gas is supplied daily from the imported LNG.

A Petrobangla official stated that the company earns Tk 22.87 from selling per unit of gas while they are now spending an average of more than Tk 27 on the same unit.

Although gas is sold to the industry sector for Tk 30 per unit, the price of gas in the power sector is Tk 14.75.

Even though the industrial customers pay higher prices, the power sector has to be prioritised in gas supply. Two more cargoes of LNG ships would have to be imported to meet the demand.

This will increase the amount of losses for Petrobangla. However, more cargoes can be imported if the Power Development Board (PDB) pays a price of Tk 27.

Narayanganj and Gazipur, the two districts next to Dhaka, are mainly known as industrial zones. Most of the export-oriented readymade garment factories are located here. Production in these factories has been disrupted for a long time due to the gas crisis. It has turned even worse in the last two weeks.

Manager (transmission and distribution) of Titas Gas in Gazipur Md Redwan told Prothom Alo that the demand of gas in Gazipur stands now at 600 million (60 crore) cubic feet but only 350 million (35 crore) cubic feet is supplied.

According to industrial police data, there are a total of 2,176 factories in Gazipur district. Out of them, 1,187 are garment factories.

The number of small and large factories there would increase to about 5,000 if the unlicensed ones are counted in. Most of these factories are gas-powered.

Sohel Rana, Director of Sadma Group located in Mouchak area of Gazipur, told Prothom Alo that the gas pressure needs to be between 10 to 15 PSI (pound per square inch) for the factory to be running. But, there has not been more than two to three PSI of gas pressure in the last 15 days. Our production has been slashed by 30 to 40 per cent from this.

Deputy General Manager at Titas Gas’ Narayanganj office, Mamunur Rashid told Prothom Alo that the industrial and residential clients are receiving less amount of gas in some parts due to low supply.

MS Dyeing Printing and Finishing Limited, situated in BSCIC Industrial Estate in Fatullah of Narayanganj, has a production capacity of 40 tonnes. However, their production has dropped to 10 tonnes.

The company sent a letter to Titas on 23 April mentioning the matter of commercial losses caused from the low gas pressure.

While visiting the factory Sunday afternoon, the boiler was found shut and the gas pressure reading showed zero PSI. Another factory in BSCIC Industrial Estate, Fare Apparels Limited was out of production since morning and the workers were found sitting idle.

Research director at non-government research organisation, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), Khondaker Golam Moazzem told Prothom Alo that managing the energy supply crisis is a major challenge for the government.

They have to take the social, economic and political aspects into consideration, he advised.

According to him, the government must not go for increased LNG import to strike a balance in gas supply. “We need to emphasise on exploring and producing gas domestically.”

[Prothom Alo correspondents in Gazipur and Narayanganj have helped prepare this report.]

* The report, originally published in the print and online edition of Prothom Alo, has been rewritten in English by Nourin Ahmed Monisha​
 

Matarbari power as expensive as peers
Tariff could exceed Tk 13 a unit
Emran Hossain 03 May, 2025, 00:45

1746237085675.png


The power tariff of the coal-fired 1,200-megawatt Matarbari power plant is going to be as high as its peers, observed energy experts, saying that the government-approved power tariff made it appear as if the tariff was lower than that of the electricity purchased from similar power plants.

On April 29, the advisory committee on government purchase approved the public power plant’s power tariff at Tk 8.44 a kilowatt-hour or 7.6621 US cents a kWh, with Tk 5.84 a kWh spent as fuel cost and Tk 2.60 a kWh given as capacity charge.

An official document showed that the rates of fuel use and capacity charge were determined considering that the power plant operated at 85 per cent of its capacity.

The document also showed that the calculation considered the dollar exchange rate to be Tk 110.25.

The dollar exchange rate is crucial in determining the tariff since power plants depend on fuel import for their production and their capacity charge is paid mostly in the dollar. The current dollar rate, according to the Bangladesh Bank, is Tk 122.

‘Considering the dollar rate at such a low level in the calculation is misleading,’ said Hasan Mehedi, member secretary of the Bangladesh Working Group on Ecology and Development, a forum of rights activists and organisations.

‘The tariff of coal-based power plant is tough to determine for it involves so many issues and uncertainties,’ he said.

An analysis done past year by the Bangladesh Power Development Board revealed that the average fuel cost among all coal-fired power plants in the country was Tk 7.02, more than 16 per cent higher than what the newly approved Matarbari tariff allowed.

The fuel cost varied greatly depending mainly on machine quality, coal quality and the operational period of power plants. For instance, the fuel cost in a unit of the Barapukuriya power plant was Tk 12.30, the PDB analysis showed.

In joint venture coal-based power plants, the fuel cost ranged between Tk 6.67 and Tk 7.84. The coal-fired independent power plants’ fuel cost ranged between Tk 6.26 and Tk 6.75.

For an ultra-supercritical coal power plant, the technology of which is also used in Matarbari, the BPDB’s fuel cost stood at Tk 6.77.

The fuel cost could vary greatly due to the high vulnerability of the international fuel market. During the Covid pandemic, the price of a tonne of coal reached $400. The current price of coal is below $100 a tonne.

The BPDB analysis also revealed that the average government-set cost stood at Tk 4.63 past year, nearly 45 per cent higher than what the Matarbari was allowed to get.

‘The plant availability factor could influence the power tariff,’ said Shafiqul Alam, lead energy analyst at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, a research organisation.

Power tariff goes up if the plant’s capacity remains unutilised, energy analysts said, given that the capacity charge is paid anyway. Increased utilisation contributes greatly to decreasing tariff, they said.

In 2023-24, according to the BPDB, the average plant availability among the coal-based power plants was 35.25 per cent.

The plant factor of the Adani coal power plant, which is supplying electricity from India, was 62.32 per cent, which was the second highest plant factor after import with 85 per cent plant factor.

Power plants in Bangladesh have never run at 85 per cent of their capacity in recent time.

The ongoing dollar crisis is a major reason for keeping power plants idle due to lack of fuel supply.

The BWGED estimated that the Matarbari power plant would actually get Tk 2,565 crore a year at the current dollar exchange rate.

If the plant availability dropped to 60 per cent, the BWGED said that at the newly announced tariff per unit of production cost at the Matarbari power plant would stand at Tk 10.55.

The tariff would increase to Tk 13.14 if the plant availability dropped to 37 per cent, which was the average plant availability of Barapukuria and Payra power plants between the financial years of 2020-21 and 2023-24.

The average coal power tariff in 2023-24 was Tk 12.74.

ANM Obaidullah, member of the BPDB, said that the government-approved tariff was determined based on the dollar exchange rate the day the plant rolled into commercial operation.

‘This is the base price,’ said Obaidullah.

‘Depending on situations, the tariff could be changed,’ he said, saying that power tariffs were paid after evaluation based on the actual situation.

Unlike the other power plants, the Matarbari power plant started its operation without having signed a power purchase agreement.

The first unit of the Matarbari power plant started commercial operation in December 2023 and the second unit started operation in August 2024.

So far the plant has received only the fuel cost for running its operation.​
 

Bangladesh to buy six spot LNG cargoes in May
FE ONLINE REPORT
Published :
May 03, 2025 19:11
Updated :
May 03, 2025 19:11

1746317535957.png


The government is eyeing importing a total of six spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes in May, the highest number in a single month, to meet mounting summer demand.

State-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd (RPGCL) already bought five spot LNG cargoes for May delivery windows, a senior RPGCL official told The Financial Express on Saturday.

He said the RPGCL’s tender to buy one more spot LNG cargo in the May 30-31 delivery window is also open, along with two more spot LNG cargo tenders for the June 26-27 and July 2-3 delivery windows.

The country’s energy demand has gone up since early April with the advent of summer, which is expected to grow further with the rise of mercury.

Bangladesh bought four spot LNG cargoes for the deliveries in the past two months – March and April.

The bid winners will deliver the LNG cargoes at Moheshkhali Island in the Bay of Bengal, with options to discharge the cargo at either of the country’s two floating storage regasification units (FSRUs) located on Moheshkhali Island.

The RPGCL, a wholly owned subsidiary of state-run Bangladesh Oil, Gas, and Mineral Corporation, or Petrobangla, looks into LNG trades in Bangladesh.

The volume of each of the spot LNG cargoes will also be around 3.36 million British thermal units (MMBtu).

Bangladesh previously awarded its latest spot LNG cargo to Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd. for the May 25-26 delivery window at $11.83 per MMBtu.

Bangladesh currently imports LNG from Qatar Energy and OQ Trading International under long-term deals and purchases LNG also from the spot market to re-gasify LNG in its two operational FSRUs, having a total capacity of 1.10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd).

The country has been reeling from an acute energy crisis as its natural gas output is depleting.

Bangladesh has been rationing gas supply to industries, power plants and other gas-guzzling industries to cope with the mounting demand.​
 

Tackling renewable energy's critical dimensions
Muhammad Zamir
Published :
May 04, 2025 23:53
Updated :
May 04, 2025 23:53

1746404865592.png


Renewable energy, also called green energy, is made from renewable natural resources that are replenished on a human timescale. Some also consider nuclear power a renewable power source, although this is controversial, as nuclear energy requires mining uranium, a nonrenewable resource. Renewable energy installations can be large or small and are suited for both urban and rural areas.

Renewable energy systems have rapidly become more efficient and cheaper over the past 30 years. A large majority of worldwide newly installed electricity capacity is now renewable. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, have seen significant cost reductions over the past decade, making them more competitive with traditional fossil fuels. From 2011 to 2021, renewable energy has grown from 20 per cent to 28 per cent of global electricity supply. Power from the Sun and wind accounts for most of this increase, growing from a combined 2 per cent to 10 per cent. Use of fossil energy has also shrunk from 68 per cent to 62 per cent. In 2024, renewables accounted for over 30 per cent of global electricity generation and are projected to reach over 45 per cent by 2030. Many countries already have renewables contributing more than 20 per cent to their total energy supply, with some generating over half or even all their electricity from renewable sources.

Renewable energy is usually understood as energy harnessed from continuously occurring natural phenomena. The International Energy Agency defines it as "energy derived from natural processes that are replenished at a faster rate than they are consumed". Solar power, wind power, hydroelectricity, geothermal energy and biomass are widely agreed to be the main types of renewable energy. Renewable energy often displaces conventional fuels in three particular areas-- electricity generation, heating water and transportation. It is also useful for providing rural (off-grid) energy services.

Solar power produced around 1.3 terrawatt-hours (TWh) worldwide in 2022, representing 4.6 per cent of the world's electricity. Almost all of this growth has happened since 2010. Solar energy can be harnessed anywhere that receives sunlight; however, the amount of solar energy that can be harnessed for electricity generation is influenced by weather conditions, geographic location and time of day.

At this point one also needs to recognise that renewable energy has a critical role in addressing climate change. As part of the global effort to limit climate change, most countries have committed to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. In practice, this means phasing out fossil fuels and replacing them with low-emissions energy sources. This much needed process, coined as "low-carbon substitutions" in contrast to other transition processes including energy additions, needs to be accelerated multiple times in order to successfully mitigate climate change. It may be recalled that at the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, around three-quarters of the world's countries set a goal of tripling renewable energy capacity by 2030.

The European Union aims to generate 40 per cent of its electricity from renewables by the same year. The European Union has pledged Euro 1.3 billion, urging Bangladesh to increase renewable energy use by over 3 per cent and reform its energy structure. Recently, an event--"Renewable Energy Fest 2025" in Bangladesh focused on a green energy transition through policy reform, innovation and youth participation. Dr. Michal Krejza of the EU Delegation in Bangladesh, emphasised regional energy connectivity and said, "The EU has pledged Euro 1.3 billion to increase Bangladesh's renewable energy use by more than 3 per cent and reform its energy structure. This is being considered as vital if Bangladesh is to reach its electricity demand of 58,410 MW by 2041.

It would be pertinent to understand that renewable energy is more evenly distributed around the world than fossil fuels, which are concentrated in a limited number of countries. It also brings health benefits by reducing air pollution caused by the burning of fossil fuels.

Solar power produced around 1.3 terawatt-hours (TWh) worldwide in 2022, representing 4.6 per cent of the world's electricity. Almost all of this growth has happened since 2010. Solar energy can be harnessed anywhere that receives sunlight; however, the amount of solar energy that can be harnessed for electricity generation is influenced by weather conditions, geographic location and time of day.

Eco-scientists have observed that humans have harnessed wind energy for more than 2200 years. Until the 20th century, it was primarily used to power ships, windmills and water pumps. Today, the vast majority of wind power is used to generate electricity using wind turbines. Modern utility-scale wind turbines range from around 600 kW to 9 MW of rated power. The power available from the wind is a function of the cube of the wind speed, so as wind speed increases, power output increases up to the maximum output for the particular turbine. Areas where winds are stronger and more constant, such as offshore and high-altitude sites, are preferred locations for wind farms.

Wind-generated electricity met nearly 4 per cent of global electricity demand in 2015, with nearly 63 GW of new wind power capacity installed. Wind energy was the leading source of new capacity in Europe, the US and Canada, and the second largest in China. In Denmark, wind energy met more than 40 per cent of its electricity demand while Ireland, Portugal and Spain each met nearly 20 per cent.

Globally, the long-term technical potential of wind energy is believed to be five times total current global energy production, or 40 times current electricity demand, assuming all practical barriers needed were overcome. This would require wind turbines to be installed over large areas, particularly in areas of higher wind resources, such as offshore and likely also industrial use of new types of VAWT turbines in addition to the horizontal axis units currently in use. As offshore wind speeds average ~90 per cent greater than that of land, offshore resources can contribute substantially more energy than land-stationed turbines.

Investments in wind technologies reached US Dollar 161 billion in 2020, with onshore wind dominating at 80 per cent of total investments from 2013 to 2022. Offshore wind investments nearly doubled to US Dollar 41 billion between 2019 and 2020, primarily due to policy incentives in China and expansion in Europe.

It needs to be noted here that technological research is continuing at a serious and comprehensive manner with regard to the improvement of renewable energy technologies. There are also other renewable energy technologies that are still under development, including enhanced geothermal systems, concentrated solar power, cellulosic ethanol and marine energy.

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) has stated that ~86 per cent (187 GW) of renewable capacity added in 2022 had lower costs than electricity generated from fossil fuels. IRENA also stated that the capacity added since 2000 reduced electricity bills in 2022 by at least US Dollar 520 billion, and that in non-OECD countries, the lifetime savings of 2022 capacity additions will reduce costs by up to US Dollar 580 billion.

Solar power, also known as solar electricity, is the conversion of energy from sunlight into electricity, either directly using photovoltaics (PV) or indirectly using concentrated solar power. Solar panels use the photovoltaic effect to convert light into an electric current. Concentrated solar power systems use lenses or mirrors and solar tracking systems to focus a large area of sunlight to a hot spot, often to drive a steam turbine.

Photovoltaics (PV) were initially solely used as a source of electricity for small and medium-sized applications, from the calculator powered by a single solar cell to remote homes powered by an off-grid rooftop PV system. Commercial concentrated solar power plants were first developed in the 1980s. Since then, as the cost of solar panels has fallen, grid-connected solar PV systems' capacity and production has doubled about every three years. Three-quarters of new generation capacity is solar, with both millions of rooftop installations and gigawatt-scale photovoltaic power stations continuing to be built.

By 2024, solar power was generating 6.9 per cent (2,132 TWh) of global electricity and over 1 per cent of primary energy, adding twice as much new electricity as coal. Along with onshore wind power, utility-scale solar has become the source for new installations in most countries. As of 2023, 33 countries generated more than a tenth of their electricity from solar, with China making up more than half of solar growth. Almost half the solar power installed in 2022 was mounted on rooftops.

It would be worthwhile to point out here that solar-cell efficiencies of laboratory-scale devices using pertinent materials have increased from 3.8 per cent in 2009 to 25.7 per cent in 2021 in single-junction architectures, and, in silicon-based tandem cells, to 29.8 per cent, exceeding the maximum efficiency achieved in single-junction silicon solar cells. Perovskite solar cells have, therefore, been the fastest advancing solar technology as of 2016. With the potential of achieving even higher efficiencies and very low production costs, perovskite solar cells have become commercially attractive. Core problems and research subjects include their short and long-term stability.

Recently experts have suggested that Bangladesh urgently needs a long-term financing roadmap to promote renewable-energy projects and reach the country's target of net-zero carbon emission by 2050. They have also observed that to achieve the goal, the country that is extremely vulnerable to global warming, also requires the framing of the monetary policy in such a way that the commercial lenders-- both state-owned commercial Banks (SCBs) and private commercial Banks (PCBs)-- can feel encouraged to support proliferation of renewable energy.

In this context, it was good to know that the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) has agreed to provide US Dollar 167 million in loans -- roughly Tk 20.10 billion -- to develop a 220MW solar power plant in the Sonagazi area of Feni district, a facility with the highest solar capacity in the country to date. The Power Division proposed the project with an estimated cost of Tk 21.35 billion, with the combined contribution of the government and Electricity Generation Company of Bangladesh Limited (EGCB) amounting to Tk 1.25 billion, according to Planning Commission sources. The project seeks to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, lower carbon emissions, and contribute to economic development and improved living standards.

Muhammad Zamir, a former Ambassador, is an analyst specialised in foreign affairs, right to information and good governance.​
 

Govt to buy 4 more LNG cargoes over next 4 months to supply more gas to industries
FE Online Report
Published :
May 07, 2025 20:14
Updated :
May 07, 2025 20:14

1746664074126.png


The government has moved to buy four additional liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes during the next four months from May to August at the cost of around Tk 28 billion to allocate more gas to industrial consumers.

State-run Petrobangla will also reduce natural gas allocations for gas-fired power plants to 1,050 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) from existing 1,200 mmcfd to ramp up gas supply to industries by 150 mmcfd.

Adviser of the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Muhammad Fouzul Kabir Khan drew up the plan to ramp up natural gas supplies to industries during a meeting with businesspersons at the Secretariat Wednesday.

Some 100 mmcfd of additional gas from additional LNG cargoes and some 150 mmcfd from divertion will ensure around 250 mmcfd of additional gas in total for industries during the next four months, said Mr Khan.

The government will have to spend an additional Tk110 billion to supply this additional gas to the industry, he added.

President of Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters’ Association (BKMEA) Md Hatem, Hamim Group Director AK Azad, Meghna Group managing director Mostafa Kamal, Pran Group Chairman Ahsan Khan Chowdhury, Bangladesh Chamber of Industries (BCI) president Anwar Ul Alam Chowdhury Parvez, energy secretary Saiful Islam, Petrolbangla Chairman Md Rezanur Rahman and Chief Advisor's press secretary Shafiqul Alam were among others attended the meeting.​
 

Govt floats tender to buy one more spot LNG cargo in June
FE Online Report
Published :
May 11, 2025 19:20
Updated :
May 11, 2025 19:31

1747007812858.png


The government has reissued a tender to purchase one spot LNG cargo for the June 26–27 delivery window to meet growing summer demand from industries and power plants.

State-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd (RPGCL) reissued the tender last week to procure the cargo, which will have a volume of around 3.36 million British thermal units (MMBtu).

The winning bidder will deliver the LNG cargo to Moheshkhali Island in the Bay of Bengal, with the option to discharge it at either of the country’s two floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) located on the island.

RPGCL reissued the tender after cancelling the previous one because of receiving higher-than-expected price proposals from suppliers, said a senior RPGCL official.

If this tender succeeds, the country’s total spot LNG purchases for June will be three cargoes -- half the number purchased in May, he said.

Bangladesh bought six spot LNG cargoes for May deliveries, the highest in a single month so far this year.

The country expects lower LNG demand in June due to cooler temperatures and monsoon rainfall, which is likely to result in fewer spot LNG purchases, the RPGCL official added.

RPGCL, a wholly owned subsidiary of state-run Petrobangla, oversees LNG trading in Bangladesh.

Recently, Bangladesh awarded two spot LNG cargo tenders to Vitol Asia Pte Ltd for the May 30–31 and July 2–3 delivery windows at \$11.44 per MMBtu and \$11.57 per MMBtu, respectively.

In addition to spot cargoes, Bangladesh has been importing LNG from its two long-term suppliers --QatarEnergy LNG (formerly Qatargas) and OQ Trading International -- for regasification at its two operational FSRUs.​
 

Watt’s going on? A renewable dream stuck in load-shedding

1747011232937.png

Renewable Energy Policy (REP) 2025 needs a serious rewrite. Targets must be based on sound projections, not fantasies. FILE ILLUSTRATION: REHNUMA PROSHOON

Renewable energy in Bangladesh is a bit like your overly ambitious cousin who swears they'll start waking up at 6:00 am, run 10 kilometres, and read Tolstoy before breakfast—grand promises, minimal follow-through, and inevitably back to square one by the weekend. Every now and then, we're treated to a flashy announcement: a new solar megaproject here, a bold wind energy target there, all wrapped in glossy government statements and hashtags like #GreenBangladesh. We are now in 2025, and despite years of courtship with solar panels and flirtation with wind turbines, we're still stuck in a toxic relationship with fossil fuels—cuddling up to imported coal and whispering sweet nothings to liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Let's look at the reality behind the ribbon cuttings. Despite years of lofty commitments and climate conference pledges, renewable energy in Bangladesh accounts for only about 4.5 percent of total installed capacity, and more than 80 percent of that comes from solar. But even that number flatters to deceive. Most of it is from small, decentralised systems—rooftop solar, solar home systems in villages—not large-scale, grid-connected solar farms. The sun might shine relentlessly here, but our solar energy ambitions collapse faster than a flimsy Dhaka umbrella in July rain.

Why is the picture so bleak in a country that quite literally bakes under the sun and gets enough wind along the coast to power an Atif Aslam concert? Because our approach to renewable energy is equal parts chaotic and comical. Think of it as a gym subscription, enthusiastically bought, barely used, and always waiting for "the first of next month." One minute we're promising 6,000 megawatts of renewable energy by 2025, and the next, we're cutting the power sector budget by 15 percent and quietly stalling the very policy reforms that would make those targets remotely achievable.

Let's dissect the big announcement. The long-awaited draft of the Renewable Energy Policy (REP) 2025 was finally published in February, heralding the same old excitement, now with bigger numbers. It promises that by 2030, Bangladesh will generate 20 percent of its electricity—6,145 megawatts—from renewables. By 2041, this will leap to 30 percent. It sounds impressive until you realise the whole projection is based on an inflated electricity demand estimate from the Integrated Energy and Power Master Plan (IEPMP). According to the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), a more realistic figure for 20 percent renewable electricity by 2030 would be around 5,600 megawatts, and just 10,500 megawatts for 30 percent by 2041. In other words, the government has taken some creative liberties with its math.

Let's not forget that back in 2008, Bangladesh set a modest goal of reaching 10 percent renewable electricity by 2020. That deadline ghosted us like a flaky Hinge match. Fast forward to today, and we're barely scraping five percent. Yet we are now expected to believe we'll quadruple that number in just six years. To put things in perspective, even China, the undisputed heavyweight champion of renewables, is targeting 25 percent non-fossil energy by 2030. Bangladesh, which has neither China's resources, infrastructure, nor investment climate, thinks it can match that. Bold. Delusional, but bold.

What really makes the draft policy shine, in the same way cheap plastic does under bad lighting, is its complete avoidance of any fossil fuel phase-out plan. Countries like the United Kingdom and Germany have legally committed to phasing out coal. Bangladesh? We're still busy signing new fossil fuel deals like it's 1999. The draft throws around the phrase "green energy" with such abandon you'd think it means anything remotely not-black—bioenergy, waste-to-energy, and other vaguely greenish things. Meanwhile, natural gas and nuclear power continue to dominate the IEPMP, making the entire renewable section of the policy feel like a reluctant afterthought, written at 2:00am before a donor meeting.

It gets better—or worse, depending on your appetite for bureaucratic chaos. The draft assigns oversight of renewable energy projects to the Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA ), while giving licensing power to the Bangladesh Energy Regulatory Commission. So now, we're left with a classic two-headed administrative monster. One body to dream up ideas, another to sign them off, and both to blame each other when nothing gets done.

Financing? That part is written in invisible ink. The policy mumbles about a Sustainable Energy Development Fund but uses delightful hedging language like "may be implemented" and "could be considered." Which is a bit like a marriage proposal that goes, "I might, perhaps, love you… in theory." It name-drops Bangladesh Bank and the Infrastructure Development Company Limited but forgets to outline how any of this will translate into real money. There's not a single concrete strategy to generate the billions of dollars necessary for this transition. And foreign investors? The policy greets them with all the warmth of a Dhaka traffic jam. No incentives, no guarantees, just a polite shrug and a vague mention of possible stamp duty waivers.

Industries, which consume most of the electricity in the country, don't fare much better. The draft policy gives a casual nod to rooftop solar for factories but offers no real blueprint for integrating solar energy into the energy-hungry manufacturing sector. It dangles carrots like "production-linked incentives may be provided" and "waivers may be considered for EVs," without saying anything. The entire policy reads like a horoscope—generously vague, suspiciously optimistic, and completely open to interpretation.

And what of our national grid? Ah, yes, that antique piece of electrical infrastructure, about as ready for a renewable revolution as a tea kettle is for launching satellites. Our solar projects sit idle because the grid can't handle the load. Wind projects are stuck in limbo. Meanwhile, someone from the ministry insists it was all "working fine yesterday."

Meanwhile, ministers cruise around in fossil-fuel-guzzling sports utility vehicles (SUVs), giving speeches about green energy in front of billboards that read "Go Green" in fonts large enough to be visible from outer space. It's satire that writes itself.

So, what can actually be done? For starters, REP 2025 needs a serious rewrite. Targets must be based on sound projections, not fantasies. A proper fossil fuel phase-out timeline must be included. Financial incentives should be made real, not theoretical. Off-grid and rooftop solar should be given a central role in industrial zones. SREDA needs to be empowered with full licensing authority, so at least someone is clearly in charge. And above all, we need to swap out all those "may"s and "could"s for "shall"s and "will"s—because climate change doesn't respond to passive voice.

Right now, Bangladesh's renewable energy policy looks like it was written to impress donors and confuse citizens. And as we fumble forward with candles during load-shedding, fanning ourselves with expired optimism, it's worth remembering potential means nothing without action.

Thus, here's hoping we graduate from glossy dreams to gritty implementation. Because sunlight may be free, but stupidity is proving to be very, very expensive.

Barrister Noshin Nawal is an activist, feminist, and a columnist for The Daily Star.​
 

Govt set to nearly halve power subsidies in FY 2026
FHM Humayan Kabir
Published :
May 14, 2025 00:55
Updated :
May 14, 2025 00:55

1747180534559.png


The government is set to halve the power subsidy for the next fiscal year (FY2025-26) to reduce the financial burden on the exchequer.

A substantial payment already made to clear the outstanding bills accumulated over the last couple of years for purchasing electricity from the independent power producers and an efficient power-sector- management plan apparently helped the government to go for the cutback.

Analysts, however, suggested maintaining a balance between the subsidy reduction and electricity tariffs so that the consumers, particularly households, do not have to bear the brunt.

In the national budget for FY 2025-26, scheduled to be placed in parliament on June 2, the allocation for power subsidy would be Tk 350 billion, about 56.5 per cent of Tk 620 billion revised allocation for the outgoing fiscal year, officials said on Tuesday.

The original allocation for power subsidy was Tk 360 billion for FY 2024-25.

The plan to cut Tk 270 billion or nearly 43.5 per cent signals a major shift in the government's approach to managing the financial burden of the power sector, analysts said.

The current fiscal year witnessed a considerable increase in power subsidies due to huge payment obligations of outstanding bills, accumulated over the last couple of years on account of mainly capacity charges and other bills of power producers.

"We have a plan to cut the subsidy in the upcoming FY as we have already paid a major portion of the dues in the current FY," said a senior official at the Ministry of Finance (MoF).

He said the power sector is likely to get an allocation of Tk 350 billion as the subsidy aimed at paying the arrears and bills of the Independent Power Producers (IPPs) like Indian Adani Power, Summit Power, and Aggreko Intl.

Bangladesh needs to provide huge subsidies every year mainly to pay outstanding bills to the IPPs against the purchase of electricity at higher rate from the producers and sell it to the consumers at lower prices.

An MoF official told the FE that they had already released Tk 460 billion out of Tk 620 billion subsidies, kept aside at the revised national budget for FY2025, to pay the arrears.

The remaining amount of subsidies would be released based on the demand by the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) in the coming days, he added.

The interim government augmented budgetary subsidy to Tk 620 billion in the current FY2025 budget as it wishes to pay the accumulated arrears by the next fiscal year.

The government owed the IPPs and the private-sector rental- power plants nearly Tk 130 billion until last month (April), as per data collected by the FE from the Power Division and the MoF documents on the payment obligations.

Indian Adani Power, Bangladesh-China Power Company Plant (Payra power plant), Meghnaghat 450MW Power Ltd, 210MW Rural Power Co Ltd, 335MW Summit-Meghnaghat Power Ltd and 414MW Sembcorp NWPC Ltd, 145MW Aggreko International Projects, United Power and Doreen Power are the major IPPs working in Bangladesh.

Another MoF official said that they are going to allocate a comparatively lesser amount of funds for the next FY as the power subsidy in the upcoming national budget amid expectations of a potential easing of global fuel prices in the coming fiscal year.

Moreover, the government has been emphasising on efficiency improvements within the power generation and distribution companies to reduce operational costs.

Additionally, there would be a push towards gradual adjustments of electricity tariffs to better reflect the actual cost of generation, the MoF official said, with a reference to the IMF's suggestion to this effect.

While the move towards reducing subsidies is seen by some economists as a positive step towards fiscal consolidation and promoting a more sustainable energy sector, concerns remain about its potential impact on consumers.

Any significant upward adjustment in electricity tariffs could put a strain on household budgets and potentially affect industrial competitiveness.

"The reduction in subsidies is a double-edged sword," said Dr Fahmida Khatun, a leading economist and Executive Director at the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).

"While it's crucial for the long-term financial health, the government must carefully manage the transition to avoid sharp price hikes that could negatively impact the economy and the general public."

Stakeholders in the power sector, including generation companies, distribution entities, and consumer groups, will be closely watching the developments and their potential implications.

The government is expected to outline its strategy for mitigating any adverse impact of reduced subsidies, which could include targeted support for vulnerable populations and industries, as well as continued efforts to improve the efficiency and sustainability of the power sector, said an official at the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB).

The focus will likely be on striking a balance between fiscal responsibilities and ensuring affordable and reliable access to electricity for all, he said.

However, government officials maintained that the subsidy is a necessary measure in the short- to medium-term to ensure energy security and support the nation's development goals.

They emphasize that alongside the subsidies, the government is also actively pursuing strategies to diversify the energy mix, enhance efficiency in power generation and transmission, and explore renewable energy sources to achieve greater energy independence and reduce the financial burden in the long run.

Further details regarding the specific mechanisms for subsidy reduction and potential tariff adjustments are expected to be revealed during the budget presentation and subsequent discussions, officials said.​
 

Government's plan for increasing gas supply for industries
Mushfiqur Rahman

Published :
May 15, 2025 11:48
Updated :
May 15, 2025 11:48

1747352081669.png


The government has decided to increase gas supply for the industry sector. Dr Fauzul Kabir Khan, Energy adviser of the interim government, informed that the initiative would be taken to increase LNG import (4 additional LNG cargo would be imported during May-August 2025) for additional gas supply in the country. He further informed that natural gas supply would be reduced (from the existing 1,200 mmcfd to 1,050 mmcfd) for power sector and the industries would get more gas. The impact of gas supply shortages for the power plants would be minimised by increased use of liquid fuel-based power plants. Business and Industry leaders of the country have long been demanding unhindered gas and power supply for the industries.

Petrobangla struggles to maintain gas supply as the domestic productions for natural gas has been steadily declining in the country. Currently, Petrobangla has been supplying approximately 2,700 mmcfd (both from domestic productions and from imported LNG). Imported LNG, regasification of the same and transmission of the natural gas processed from LNG remain costly and importing more LNG results in increasing government subsidies. The Energy Adviser informed that the additional 4 cargo LNG import (each LNG cargo holds approximately 3,000 million cubic feet of gas equivalent after regasification) during May-August 2025 period would compel the government to balance Taka 11,000 crore (Tk. 110 billion) shortfall for Petrobangla.

Business leaders have been claiming that the shortages of natural gas supply and abrupt gas price hikes at a regular interval 'erodes Bangladesh's regional competiveness', hurting investment and industrial growth. Energy Regulatory Commission raised 33 per cent gas prices for new industries and captive power plants on 13 April 2025. As per published sources, manufacturing sector consumes approximately 19 per cent and captive power sector consumes 18 per cent gas from the total consumption in industry and power sector in the country. So far, imported LNG share of the country's total gas supply accounts about 30 per cent. The balance supply is ensured from domestic sources (Petrobangla and IOC productions). Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA) criticised the government's decision (for gas tariff hike) as 'discriminatory' and called for review of the decision.

Ministry of Finance sources inform that the government's revised budget for the current financial year included Taka 190 billion crore subsidies for power, LNG and fertiliser. As reported, subsidies for power sector for the fiscal year stood at Taka 62,000 crore, for LNG Taka 9,000 crore and fertiliser Taka 28,000 crore. Experts consider that the price escalation for energy commodities in the global market and a number of wrong policies introduced in the energy and power sector in Bangladesh are responsible for huge government subsidy requirements for energy and power sectors. Experts feel that policy interventions and consistent monitoring of their execution to reduce the capacity charges paid to the power plants, eliminating inefficiencies and wastage of resources are important for reducing the subsidy burden. At the same time, government initiatives are urgent for increasing investment for domestic primary energy development.

Analysts have been observing that efficient use of energy and power has been increasing in industry sectors, specially, in small industrial enterprises. Experts also observe that the published information on GDP growth rate and growth of electricity consumption in the country do not match. Reports suggest that during the last 15 years electricity generation capacity growth in the country has increased almost 4.75 times. On the contrary, electricity consumption capacity growth remains limited (within the limits of 16-17 thousand megawatts maximum). Published sources further inform that during 2016-2024 period, electricity consumption growth was on average 4 per cent. Sector analysts observe that the industrial electricity consumption rate in the country is not increasing as expected. Industry owners prefer not to rely on grid electricity due to its unreliability. They rely on captive power generation. Published reports indicate that captive power generation capacity installed in the country is approximately 3,000 MW. President of the Bangladesh Chamber of Industries (BCI) Mr. Anwarul Alam Chowdhury considers that the 'growth of electricity use in industry sector is not significant'. He further considers that the true information on the country's GDP growth, energy sector growth should be published for the benefit of all concerned.

It may be recalled, that the previous government prepared the 'Power System Master Plan 2010' and projected that the annual growth of electricity would reach 10 per cent. The document projected that the economic growth would increase significant demand for electricity in the country. Based on the projections, nearly 90 power plants projects had been approved during 2010-2024 period. In reality, a large numbers of the installed power plants have been sitting idle as electricity demand growth projections did not prove correct. As a result, the burden for payments of huge capacity charges for the idling power plants has been increasing.

Mushfiqur Rahman is a mining engineer. He writes on energy and environment issues.​
 

Adani Power and high cost of its electricity
SYED MUHAMMED SHOWAIB

Published :
May 17, 2025 00:52
Updated :
May 17, 2025 00:52

1747438955320.png


The cost of keeping the lights on in Bangladesh is drawing ever more intense scrutiny, especially over electricity imported under the agreement with Adani Power. In early May, Adani Power's Chief Financial Officer Dilip Jha disclosed that Bangladesh owes approximately $0.9 billion for electricity supplied from the 1,600 MW Godda Plant in India's Jharkhand state. This follows a $1.2 billion payment made to Adani just last November. By June, the outstanding amount is projected to reach $1.3 billion, once again placing considerable pressure on the country's foreign currency reserves and raising serious questions about the wisdom of the deal.

One reason why the dues are mounting so quickly is the steep late payment fee, which reportedly stood at $136 million as of May 2025, accruing at an interest rate of 2.0 per cent per month. That's nearly 27 per cent annually, making it a penalty five times higher than typical global borrowing costs. With reserves already depleted to just over $20 billion following recent international payments, it is getting increasingly difficult for Bangladesh to sustain such costly terms.

The core issue, however, lies in the inflated cost of electricity itself. In fiscal year 2023-24, Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) paid an average of Tk 14.87 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) to Adani, totalling over Tk 121 billion or around $1.0 billion. In contrast, other Indian suppliers charged significantly lower prices. NVVN Ltd charged around Tk 8.07 per kWh, Sembcorp Energy India Ltd Tk 10.42 and PTC India Ltd Tk 9.28. This puts Adani's tariff at least 30 per cent higher than comparable suppliers. The discrepancy becomes even more pronounced when compared to domestic projects such as the 1,200 MW Matarbari Coal-Fired Power Plant in Cox's Bazar, which has agreed to sell power to BPDB at just Tk 8.45 per kWh.

In a country where public subsidies are required to keep retail electricity prices affordable, such inflated import prices are hard to justify. Subsidising overpriced electricity drains public funds and distorts budget priorities, yet the government has little choice if it wants to avoid public backlash over higher retail electricity prices. Amid these concerns, the High Court in November last year ordered the formation of a committee to review the terms and conditions of the power purchase agreement with Adani. A three-member committee was reportedly formed in response, but its findings are yet to be made public.

The over-reliance on imported electricity also raises strategic considerations. Energy is a strategic asset, and dependence on a single foreign supplier under restrictive and lopsided conditions leaves Bangladesh exposed to serious geopolitical and economic vulnerabilities. It is not hard to see how Europe paid a heavy price for its dependence on Russian gas after the invasion of Ukraine, for instance.

Bangladesh has relied heavily on energy imports in recent years, often out of necessity. But that necessity is quickly diminishing. A number of domestic energy projects including gas, coal, solar and the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant is set to transform the country's energy mix. Rooppur alone will add 1,200 MW of nuclear capacity by late 2025. Several existing plants are also operating below capacity due to fuel supply or grid issues, not for a lack of infrastructure. This changing situation makes it both necessary and possible to revisit past deals signed under very different conditions.

The Adani agreement is particularly troubling not only because of high cost, but also for its lack of transparency. Under the PPA, Adani Power was required to disclose any tax exemptions granted by the Indian government. However, BPDB officials have reported that Adani failed to inform them about a key regulatory change. In February 2019, India amended its Special Economic Zone (SEZ) policy to grant tax-free status to Adani's Godda plant for electricity exports. This benefit was never passed on to Bangladesh which constituted a breach of contract and a serious lapse in disclosure. Had Bangladesh been informed, it could have pushed for a lower tariff to reflect Adani's reduced operating costs. Instead, the country not only overpaid for electricity but also ended up subsidising a foreign company's tax advantage.

Given the scenario, Bangladesh has a strong case for renegotiating its agreement with Adani Power. Although the contract reportedly contains strict conditions for termination, this only makes renegotiation more urgent. An unfavourable deal does not mean it is unchangeable. In international business, new information and changing circumstances, especially failures to disclose key terms, can provide legitimate grounds for reopening agreements. Doing so, however, requires political will and strategic foresight. The BPDB's approach to Adani Power should be that of a sovereign entity protecting its economic future, not merely a passive debtor. The renegotiation efforts should also prioritise all three demands: lowering per-unit cost, softening late payment penalty and adjusting tax-sharing terms in light of exemptions granted to Adani by the Indian government.

Bangladesh need not enter this process from a position of weakness. The Matarbari agreement with the Coal Power Generation Company of Bangladesh Ltd (CPGCBL) provides a clear and relevant benchmark. If a domestic plant using imported coal can offer electricity at Tk 8.45 per kWh, there is little justification for paying nearly twice that amount for similar energy from across the border. Furthermore, Bangladesh's growing domestic capacity means that the country will soon have the option to reduce its reliance on external suppliers. This shift in energy self-sufficiency strengthens its negotiating hand.

Globally, many countries are rethinking their energy strategies in the face of fossil fuel depletion. China, the UAE, the United States and even India are expanding their nuclear power infrastructure. Nuclear power offers long-term stability and low running costs, advantages Bangladesh must make the most of through Rooppur and future projects. A forward-looking energy policy should focus on building domestic and sustainable sources, not tie the country to expensive and rigid deals born of short-term need.

The deal with Adani Power does not have to remain a long-term burden. With a clear strategy, Bangladesh can push to revise the deal, protect its economy, and make better use of its public funds.​
 

Undoing power sector damage
Published :
May 18, 2025 00:33
Updated :
May 18, 2025 00:33

1747526542620.png


The full scale of mismanagement, waste and arbitrary decisions that characterised Bangladesh's power sector under the authoritarian Awami League regime is increasingly becoming more apparent. One deal after another, struck by the state-run Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB), stands out for poor judgment and disregard for national interest. The 718MW JERA Meghnaghat plant stands as a prime example of these problematic deals. Despite the project's completion, it remains idle due to an acute gas shortage and transmission bottlenecks, yet the government is liable to pay millions in capacity charges. This arrangement, signed under a long-term power purchase agreement (PPA), is indicative of the imprudence that has defined energy planning in recent years where contracts were awarded without due diligence, tariffs were inflated and foreign interests were accommodated at the expense of public funds.

The JERA Meghnaghat plant is merely the tip of the iceberg in the power sector's crisis. Across the industry, the country is burdened with expensive electricity from unsolicited projects awarded under the now-defunct Speedy Supply of Power and Energy (Special Provision) Act 2010. These contracts often bypassed feasibility studies and were exempt from public scrutiny. This has led to an oversupply of generation capacity -- largely dependent on natural gas -- even though Petrobangla cannot provide even half of the required supply to keep existing plants running. Idle plants continue to collect capacity payments, bleeding the BPDB's finances dry without delivering electricity to the grid. At Meghnaghat alone, three large LNG-based plants sit underutilized due to gas shortages and delays in substation construction. Meanwhile, the government is forced to pay these idle power plant owners through capacity charges, wasting significant taxpayer funds just to meet the costly contractual obligations.

Blame for this unsustainable mess rests squarely on the ousted Awami League government, which spent years pursuing power generation targets without securing fuel supply or transmission capacity. In many instances, contracts were awarded not on the basis of national demand forecasts or technical merit, but to serve political convenience, funnel money to individuals politically connected with Awami League, and cultivate foreign partnerships for short-term gain. This wilful neglect of prudent planning and financial discipline has saddled the nation with high-cost energy, undermined investor confidence and pushed public utilities like BPDB closer to insolvency. Experts have repeatedly cautioned against inflated demand projections and warned of the dangers of overcapacity, but such concerns were brushed aside. Instead of a stable, affordable energy system, the country has been left with one that is expensive, inefficient and shaped more by private interests than public need.

There is, however, a measure of hope that the current interim administration may begin to correct course. The initiative to renegotiate tariffs that started with the JERA plant is a step in the right direction. The incumbent adviser to the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources Muhammad Fouzul Kabir Khan deserves a degree of appreciation for initiating this difficult and politically charged process. While his efforts cannot erase the consequences of a decade of misgovernance, they mark a crucial first step towards repairing the extensive damage inflicted upon the sector. To truly rectify the situation, the government must review all existing PPAs to assess fairness and economic viability one by one and phase out the unsustainable practice of capacity payments. Above all, long-term energy planning must be rooted in a reliable fuel supply chain and investment in transmission infrastructure. Bangladesh's energy future must not remain hostage to past mistakes. With a clear strategy and political will, the country can still build a power sector that truly serves its people.​
 

Govt pays off overdue Chevron gas bills
With cash in hand, US Co resurrects investment plan


M Azizur Rahman
Published :
May 18, 2025 00:10
Updated :
May 18, 2025 00:10

1747526996217.png


With cash in hand, US energy giant Chevron assures state-run Petrobangla of resurrecting its held-back investment worth around US$65 million in Jalalabad compression project, insiders said, as the interim government cleared arrears in gas bill at one go.

The Chevron Bangladesh company assurance came during a joint-management committee meeting recently following a request from Petrobangla to resume the multinational's stalled investment after clearing all overdue payments.

Chevron Bangladesh had put on hold the Jalalabad compression-project investment proposal through a letter to the state corporation on April 4, 2024.

In the letter, Chevron Bangladesh President Eric M walker wrote on deferment of the project until the overdue -payment balance was fully cleared by Petrobangla.

Prior to sending the letter, the arrears in payment to Chevron Bangladesh rose as high as to $280 million.

The international oil company (IOC) Bangladesh outfit had a plan to initiate the compression project in 2023 and it had then approved a budget worth $65 million to implement the project.

But Petrobangla was struggling to make payment to Chevron Bangladesh over the past several years following global economic turmoil caused by the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine that led to deep currency devaluation.

According to information provided by Chevron a couple of years back, upon completion of the project, it will be possible to extract an additional 352 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas from the Jalalabad gas field, said one source.

"Hence, after the implementation of the project, it will arrest the declining production trend significantly," said a senior Petrobangla official.

The failure to complete the project in time will result in a significant reduction in gas production, which will undermine the main purpose of the second extension of production period for blocks 13 and 14, he said.

But sources fear that gas production from Jalalabad field wouldn't be as large as Chevron had projected a couple of years back as the field's reserves shrank from the previous level due to continuous sucking.

"Bangladesh has been facing a significant challenge in foreign -currency issue since June 2022. As a result, Petrobangla was unable to pay regular invoices despite its keenness," a recent Petrobangla letter to the Chevron Bangladesh president clarified the reason why such delay in payment.

Regardless of the constraints, Petrobangla shows its testament of good intention and commitment towards the repayment plan, the Petrobangla letter, issued by its Director (finance) AKM Mizanur Rahman, reads.

Due to the present government's fair, transparent, accountable, and effective policies and activities, the foreign-currency-availability situation has changed, it said.

In these circumstances, Petrobangla has cleared all outstanding arrear balance, including regular invoices, within the timeframe, it also said.

"It translates that Petrobangla always remains dedicated to its commitment. We further expect that it will continue in the future, too," the government side says in the letter.

Asked about the investment plan, Chevron Bangladesh Media and Communications Manager Shaikh Jahidur Rahman said, "As part of our ongoing efforts to support the government in maintaining uninterrupted gas supply, the team is always evaluating various opportunities."

He hastens to add: "As a matter of policy, we do not comment on specific commercial matters."

Mr Rahman, however, hails the government gesture in clearing all the arrears in payments. "We greatly appreciate the efforts of the interim government, energy ministry, and Petrobangla to resolve this issue."

Separately, another investment proposal of Chevron Bangladesh worth around $500 million to develop Bangladesh's onshore hydrocarbon block-11 and attain exploration rights over an extended area of block-12 in the Surma basin is currently pending with Petrobangla for approval.

Chevron plans to explore these blocks to discover fresh gas, a move that would augment supplies to meet the country's insatiate energy needs.

The gas-rich Surma basin is situated in the country's northeast, and the region contributes much of the natural gas in the national gas grid.

Chevron had previously invested around $500 million under its Bibiyana project during 2012-2015. It included a gas-plant expansion, new development wells, and an enhanced liquid-recovery unit, Platts reported previously.

If new gas is discovered, Chevron would be able to supply natural gas within the shortest possible time using the same processing plant it uses to process Bibiyana gas, sources familiar with the situation said.

The multinational could ramp up natural gas production by up to 1.35 billion cubic feet per day from Bibiyana gas field and the new areas using the currently operational Bibiyana process plant, they added.

Petrobangla officials have said the company has not yet made any decision on Chevron's hydrocarbon exploration and its investment plan.

Chevron Bangladesh is currently the largest producer of natural gas in Bangladesh with its output of around 1.08Bcf per day from three of its onshore fields - Bibiyana, Jalalabad, and Moulavi Bazar, which are in blocks 12, 13, and 14, respectively, according to official Petrobangla data as of Saturday.​
 

Bangladesh plans additional spot LNG import in early July amid energy crisis
FE ONLINE REPORT
Published :
May 19, 2025 18:54
Updated :
May 19, 2025 18:54

1747697752457.png


The government is considering importing one more spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargo in early July to meet the country’s natural gas demand during the upcoming monsoon.

State-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd (RPGCL) aims to purchase the spot LNG cargo for delivery within the July 2-3 window, a senior RPGCL official told The Financial Express on Monday.

The volume of the spot LNG cargo is around 3.36 million British thermal units (MMBtu).

The successful bidder will deliver the LNG cargo at Moheshkhali Island in the Bay of Bengal, with options to discharge the cargo at either of the country’s two floating storage and regasification units located on Moheshkhali Island.

If this tender is successful, the country’s total procurement of spot LNG cargoes in early July will be two in total.

The country may also seek to purchase more spot LNG cargoes in late July, the official added.

Bangladesh has so far purchased three spot LNG cargoes for June deliveries.

RPGCL is a wholly owned subsidiary of state-run Petrobangla and handles LNG trading in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh recently awarded a spot LNG cargo in a buy tender to Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd for the June 26-27 delivery window at $12.18 per MMBtu.

Previously, the country awarded a July 2-3 delivery window spot LNG cargo to Vitol Asia Pte Ltd at $11.57 per MMBtu.

Bangladesh currently imports LNG from Qatar Energy and OQ Trading International under long-term deals and also purchases LNG from the spot market to regasify in its two operational floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), which have a total capacity of 1.10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd).

The country has been facing an acute energy crisis as its natural gas output declines.

Bangladesh has been rationing gas supplies to industries, power plants, and other high-demand sectors to manage the rising demand.​
 

Possible withdrawal of VAT on LNG import
Petrobangla looks to go without subsidy

M Azizur Rahman

Published :
May 22, 2025 00:32
Updated :
May 22, 2025 00:32

1747869358338.png


The state-run Petrobangla is upbeat about withdrawal of value-added tax (VAT) on the import of expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) as it would help reduce overall LNG cost and free this state-entity from any subsidy from the government, said sources.

Top officials of the Energy and Mineral Resources Division (EMRD) under the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR) and Petrobangla already held several meetings with the officials of National Board of Revenue (NBR) over the issue, they said.

"We are expecting that the NBR will withdraw 15 per cent VAT on the import of LNG as the value of this imported fuel is not added, rather reduced, as it is blended with local gas," Petrobangla's director for finance AKM Mizanur Rahman told The Financial Express on Wednesday.

When it comes to the current market price and the volume of LNG imports, Petrobangla would be able to reduce the overall LNG import cost by around Tk 65-69 billion annually.

Petrobangla received state-subsidy worth around Tk 60.35 billion during the fiscal year 2023-2024.

Currently, Petrobangla's LNG import cost from spot market is around US$14 per million British thermal unit (MMBTu) and the cost of that from long-term LNG suppliers is around US$10.50 per MMBTu, said Mr Rahman.

Petrobangla has been importing around 98 LNG cargoes - 56 from long term LNG suppliers and 42 from spot market annually.

If the country imports an increased volume of LNG, the overall cost reduction would be higher, said the Petrobangla official.

Petrobangla would be able to increase import of more cargoes with the money saved from the current VAT, which will increase the country's overall natural gas supplies and reduce the gas crisis facing industries, power plants and other gas-guzzling consumers.

According to sources at the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the government paid subsidies worth around Tk 25 billion in FY '19, Tk 35 billion in FY '20, Tk 34.97 billion in FY '21, Tk 60 billion in FY '22, and Tk 63.32 billion in FY '23 as state subsidies on account of LNG imports to Petrobangla.

Currently, LNG import faces double taxation - 15 per cent VAT at the import stage and another 15 per cent at the consumer level without any actual value addition.

It violates the core principle of VAT, it has been alleged.

Besides, the NBR slaps an additional 2.0 per cent advance tax (AT) and a 5.0 per cent source tax, inflating further the overall LNG import costs.

Bangladesh blends imported LNG with local natural gas after its re-gasification.

According to Petrobangla, the cost of blended natural gas during FY '23 was Tk 19.09 per cubic metre (cm) and it soared to Tk 23.85 per cm in FY '24 and Tk 29.39 per cm in FY '25.

The weighted average sales price of gas, however, was Tk 11.91 per cm in FY '23, Tk 22.87 per cm in FY '24 and remained the same at Tk 22.87 per cm in FY '25.

The price gap between the cost of blended natural gas and its weighted average sales price was Tk 7.18 per cm in FY '23. It came down to only Tk 0.98 per cm in FY '24 following several rounds of hike in tariffs including the highest ever rate of 178.88 per cent.

Following the significant hikes, the price gap between the cost of blended natural gas and its weighted average sales price widened again to 6.52 per cm in FY '25, according to Petrobangla.

The overall costs of gas rose to Tk 75.72 per cm in the current FY, Petrobangla has estimated.​
 

Gas distributor gets lavish on borrowed money, receives PC rebuff
FHM Humayan Kabir

Published :
May 24, 2025 00:58
Updated :
May 24, 2025 00:58

1748043094764.png


A gas-pipeline project is spurned by government planners for a lavish estimation of expenditures, including a fat consultancy cost, to be funded with local and foreign loans, insiders said Friday.

Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company PLC proposed to spend Tk 3.085 billion for consultancy service alone out of the Tk 81.61-billion pipeline-installation project, they said, only to be spurned by the Planning Commission (PC).

The state-run energy company also earmarked a massive Tk 32.187 billion worth of funds for road-restoration works which the PC noted as a "bloated cost", officials concerned told The Financial Express.

"The Commission has denied approval for the gas-pipeline project as Titas Gas has undertaken the scheme with some unnecessary expenditures taking huge amount of loans from internal and external sources," said officials involved with the approval process.

The gas-supply company has also proposed some other costs that are higher than similar kind of ongoing projects, he added.

Raising question on the necessity of undertaking the gas-pipeline-installation project on borrowed money from costly loans amid the country's present economic condition, the PC has sent back the project proposal for a recast.

The project denial came when Titas Gas company sought approval for 'Replacement and improvement of the existing gas network in Dhaka and Narayanganj City Corporation areas, incorporating GIS mapping and SCADA system project' at the Project Evaluation Committee (PEC) meeting last week.

According to the development project proposal (DPP), the state entity has undertaken Tk 81.61- billion-cost project for installing the pipeline where 90 per cent of the funds would be borrowed from home and abroad.

The company planned to borrow Tk 33.53 billion, equivalent to nearly US$280 million, from the China-based New Development Bank (NDB) and Tk 39.87 billion from government exchequer. The remaining Tk 8.21 billion was to be invested from Titas coffers.

The NDB charges interest rate based on SOFR and a spread of 50 basis points. It also charges front-end fee, commitment fee and maturity premium.

The loan's maturity is 20 years which is shorter than that of other loans, like from the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, and Japan. The 6-month SOFR rate was 4.42096 per cent on Thursday.

Titas Gas has also sought Tk 39.87 billion in loan from the Ministry of Finance (MoF). The MoF usually borrows from local banking system for fulfilling the gap financing in the country's development works.

According to the PEC-meeting sources, the attendees asked the Titas management whether this type of project with massive borrowing is the priority one of the government at this moment when the country's revenue collection and foreign-exchange reserves are in a poor state.

"Most of the funds (Tk 39.87 billion or 49 per cent) will be borrowed from internal resources. This fund will be very costly as it will be borrowed from the domestic banking system," says the official who attended the PEC meeting.

The remaining 41 per cent will be borrowed from the NDB which is also a costly, market-based loan, adds the official, requesting anonymity.

"Since the government stopped residential and some other gas connections to the consumers, so the existing pipeline may be enough for supplying gas for some few years. Besides, the MIS and SCADA system installation is an ambitious work at this moment when the Bangladesh economy is under stress," he quotes the PEC meeting as saying.

Additionally, Titas has proposed spending Tk 61.05 million for hiring cars, Tk 35.85 million for training, and Tk 1.81 billion for land acquisition, which are deemed unnecessary spending, another official says.

According to the officials, the project's net present value (NPV) is very negative, giving rise to a big question on returns.

Meanwhile, the company has sought five and a half years as project-execution period till December 2030, which is "a violation of government's project preparation, processing, approval and revision guidelines", says the official.

No responsible executives from Titas Gas PLC were available for immediate comment.​
 

Fresh tender floated to purchase one more spot LNG cargo
FE REPORT
Published :
May 23, 2025 11:51
Updated :
May 23, 2025 11:51

1748043320337.png


State-run Rupantarita Prakritik Gas Company Ltd (RPGCL) has floated a fresh tender to purchase one spot LNG cargo during the second week of July to feed growing demand in gas-guzzling power plants and industries.

The RPGCL intends to buy the spot liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargo for the July 11-12 delivery window, a senior RPGCL official told The Financial Express Thursday.

The volume of the spot LNG cargo is around 3.36 million British thermal units (MMBtu).

The bid submission deadline is May 25.

The bid winner will deliver the LNG cargo at Moheshkhali island in the Bay of Bengal, with options to discharge the cargo at either of the country's two floating storage re-gasification units located on Moheshkhali island.

If this tender becomes successful, the country's total buying of spot LNG cargoes in early July will be three.

The country might seek to buy more spot LNG cargoes in late July, said the official. Bangladesh has purchased three spot LNG cargoes for June deliveries.

RPGCL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of state-run Petrobangla and looks into LNG trades in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh previously awarded one spot LNG cargo for July 2-3 delivery window to Vitol Asia Pte Ltd at $11.57 per MMBtu.

Bangladesh currently imports LNG from Qatar Energy and OQ Trading International under long-term deals and purchases LNG also from the spot market to re-gasify in its two operational floating, storage and re-gasification units (FSRUs) having the total capacity of 1.10 billion cubic feet per day (Bcfd).

The country has been reeling from an acute energy crisis as its natural gas output is depleting.

Bangladesh has been rationing gas supply to industries, power plants and other gas-guzzling industries to cope with the mounting demand.​
 

Country's first crude-oil refinery project
Further delay likely as interim govt also moves slowly


M Azizur Rahman
Published :
May 26, 2025 01:44
Updated :
May 26, 2025 01:44

1748214040692.png


Bangladesh's delay in constructing its first crude-oil refinery after independence is set to linger further as the interim government is also in the slow lane to implement the project like the previous ones.

Bangladesh had "failed" to build any crude-oil refinery over the past half a century after its independence, resulting in huge waste of foreign currencies that went into the import of refined oils from the international market, market insiders said.


Only "negligence" on the part of the authorities concerned is to blame, they added, in an indication of the dominance of rent-seeking import lobbies.

The country's currently operational maiden refinery - Eastern Refinery Ltd (ERL) - was built way back in 1968 by French company Technip, three years before the emergence of independent Bangladesh from the Pakistani rule.

The volume of petroleum oil imports increased around threefold over the past five decades to feed the growing consumption in transport, industries, and other commercial outlets with the expansion of the country's overall economy.

The feasibility study, conducted by Engineers India Limited (EIL), has confirmed that the entire investment will be recovered in less than seven years, banking on an internal rate of return (IRR) of 16 per cent, once a new crude-oil refinery having the capacity of around 3.0 million tonnes per annum is built.

The Front End Engineering Design (FEED) report, prepared by Technip, reveals that the new refinery will help save $19 per barrel of oil.

"We are searching for foreign funding to implement the project," Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) Chairman Amin Ul Ahsan told The Financial Express Saturday.

"Once we get the funding, we shall float tenders to select an engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor to implement the project," he said.

Market sources said the previous governments delayed implementing the project in the same fashion either for arranging funds or selecting the EPC contractor.

The Energy and Mineral Resources Division (EMRD) under the Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR) is trying to arrange funds from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), and the World Bank (WB).

As per the latest development project proposal (DPP), the project cost is estimated at Tk 364 billion. It has an annual refining capacity of 3.0 million tonnes.

The BPC is set to provide Tk 110 billion for the project, while the remaining Tk 254 billion is expected to be secured from foreign loans.

Sources said the MPEMR first decided to build a new crude-oil refinery at an estimated cost of Tk 130 billion in 2010 on the basis of a feasibility study funded by the IsDB.

The EMRD redesigned the DPP in 2023 with an estimated cost of Tk 237 billion through domestic financing due to the delay caused by the unavailability of foreign resources.

The proposal was later withdrawn from the Planning Commission to implement the project with funding from the controversial S Alam industrial group, and a memorandum of understanding (MoU) was inked with the acquisitive conglomerate - now in the wilderness following the fall of the past government through an uprising.

The current interim government cancelled the MoU with S Alam Group and decided to proceed with the new unit under a project of the Annual Development Programme (ADP).

The cost of the project increased by Tk 126 billion, or 53.40 per cent, over the past two years due to delays in the name of the PPP framework.

Compared to its 2010 estimate, the project cost increased 2.8 times, said sources.

The EMRD recently decided to implement the project titled "Modernisation and expansion of Eastern Refinery Limited (ERL)" with foreign financing and BPC's own financing.

State-owned ERL is currently capable of refining only 1.5 million tonnes of petroleum products against the country's annual fuel demand of about 7.0 million tonnes.

The ERL is meeting around 18.62 per cent to 23.92 per cent of the total petroleum-oil and -lubricant demand.

The project aims to boost refining capacity to 4.5 million tonnes per year by adding another 3.0 million tonnes.

The new plant will produce Euro-5-quality fuels, which include diesel, octane and petrol with a sulphur content of less than 10 parts per million (ppm), adhering to global environmental standards and promoting cleaner air for future generations.

Implementing this project would save foreign exchange by reducing dependence on imported refined petroleum.

In addition, the plant would help increase the income of BPC by processing various value-added by-products at affordable costs, alongside the production of liquid fuels from refining crude oils, reveals the project proposal.

Besides, the proposed refinery will serve as a "forward linkage" for the "Installation of Single-Point Mooring (SPM) with Double Pipe Line" project, which was built at a cost of around Tk 80 billion and is set to initiate commercial operations soon.

The SPM project has the capacity to transport 9.0 million tonnes of fuels annually, split equally between 4.5 million tonnes of refined fuels and 4.5 million tonnes of crude oils.

Until the new refinery is completed, two-thirds of the SPM's capacity regarding crude oil will remain idle.

The EMRD has projected that petroleum demand in the country will reach 11.45 million tonnes in the fiscal year 2023-31, with an average growth rate of 5.9 per cent in the next couple of years.

Once the second unit is commissioned, the ERL will be able to meet about 40 per cent of the national demand while its share will fall to just 13 per cent in the absence of the new plant.

"It is sheer negligence from the government high-ups as it could not build a new refinery even over the past 53 years," Energy Adviser of the Consumers Association of Bangladesh (CAB) Prof M Shamsul Alam told The Financial Express.

"A vested quarter having a nexus with government high-ups has been delaying the project's execution to earn money as commission," he said, in tune with usual quips over import preference.

"Consumers are the ultimate losers," he lamented.

Building the oil refinery through competitive bidding will ensure the execution of the project in a transparent and accountable manner, said energy expert Prof M Tamim, who was a special assistant of a previous caretaker government.​
 

Petrobangla refutes claims on industrial gas crisis
The state-run agency says industrial gas supply rose 21% in the Jan-Apr period

1748306782450.png


Petrobangla has issued a clarification in response to what it described as "misleading and confusing" statements made by representatives of various associations regarding gas supply to industrial establishments.

The state-run oil, gas, and mineral corporation issued the statement a day after textile and garment industry owners claimed that many mills are on the verge of shutting down, as they are unable to operate even at minimum capacity due to an acute gas crisis.

Today, Petrobangla said the actual gas supply data contradict the claims circulated in the media.

Between January and April this year, the average daily gas supply to the industrial sector stood at 997 million cubic feet (mmcfd), up 21 percent from 823 mmcfd in the same period of 2024, it said.

In April alone, supply reached 1,088 mmcfd, a rise of around 50 percent year-on-year, the statement added.

To meet the growing industrial demand, Petrobangla has arranged the import of six additional liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes this year, it said.

The import cost of LNG is about Tk 65 per cubic metre, while industrial users pay Tk 30 and captive power producers Tk 31.50 per cubic metre.

The government is subsidising Tk 35 per cubic metre of gas supplied under the current pricing structure.

Citing additional LNG imports and adjustments in sector-wise distribution, Petrobangla said it plans to supply an extra 150 mmcfd from Wednesday.

"The government is actively working to ensure adequate gas supply to industries and has taken timely measures to that end. We hope this clarification will dispel any misunderstandings surrounding the issue," the statement said.​
 

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

Back
Top