🇧🇩 Everything About Sheikh Mujib and March 7

[Saif]

March 7 belongs to people, not just AL: Anu Muhammad
Says any attempt to erase history won't be tolerated

Anu Muhammad

Renowned economist and former Jahangirnagar University professor, Anu Muhammad, today said March 7 does not belong to the Awami League, nor is the historic speech of that day a personal matter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.

In response to the recent cancellation of March 7 as a national day, Prof Anu expressed his views on his personal Facebook account, saying that the day represents the collective consciousness of people from all walks of life, nearly every political group, and organisation in the country.

"The power of Mujib's speech was derived from the extraordinary rise of the people. In fact, the Liberation War of 1971 began on this very day.

"March 7 is undoubtedly a significant part of our history. While Sheikh Mujib is a political figure subject to criticism and analysis, but any attempts to erase history will not be tolerated," he wrote.​

 

[Saif]

Govt doesn't consider Bangabandhu the Father of the Nation: Nahid Islam

"Bangabandhu has been made controversial by the Awami League," he said

www.thedailystar.net

Govt doesn't consider Bangabandhu the Father of the Nation: Nahid Islam
interim government's stance on Bangabandhu

Nahid Islam, adviser to the Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications, and Information Technology, said today that the interim government does not recognise Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as the Father of the Nation.

"Bangabandhu has been made controversial by the Awami League," he said in response to a question from journalists at the Secretariat.

When asked if he personally considers Bangabandhu the Father of the Nation, Nahid replied, "The Awami League held power in a fascist manner. They stayed in power by suppressing people's voting rights, through enforced disappearances, killings, and even genocide. Therefore, whatever they declared—whether calling someone the Father of the Nation or designating a national day—such continuities will not remain in the new Bangladesh."

He added that the government wants to rebuild Bangladesh in a new way, which requires bringing a new perspective to history.

When asked if the government considers anything done by the Awami League to be of national importance, the adviser responded, "A government without a mandate has no legitimacy. Many actions were taken during that period, but all of them will be restructured and reassessed."

In response to a question about whether the current interim government considers Bangabandhu the Father of the Nation, he replied, "Certainly not."

He further explained, "If we did, then we wouldn't have a Father of the Nation at all. Many people have contributed to the struggles of this land. Our history didn't start in 1952 alone. We have the anti-British struggle, the movements of 1947 and 1971, as well as those of 1990 and 2024. We have many founding fathers. It is through their struggles that we achieved independence."

The information adviser also commented on the cancellation of certain national days, saying, "The national days being cancelled were imposed by the Awami League. This was fascist behaviour. The government considers them unimportant, which is why they are being cancelled."

He added that a new national day might be established to commemorate the mass uprisings.​