0

[🇧🇩] Everything about the interim government and its actions

Press space to scroll through posts
G Bangladesh Defense
[🇧🇩] Everything about the interim government and its actions
196
4K
More threads by Saif


'If discharge of duties made impossible, government will take decisions with people'

FE ONLINE DESK
Published :
May 24, 2025 18:18
Updated :
May 24, 2025 18:18

1748127666500.png


The interim government has warned that if foreign conspiracies or instigations by defeated forces render it impossible to fulfil its constitutional duties, it will present all relevant reasons to the public before taking necessary decisions.

In a statement issued by the Press Wing of the Chief Adviser following an unscheduled meeting of the Advisory Council on Saturday afternoon, the government expressed its deep concern over actions that are impeding its ability to operate effectively.

The meeting was held at the Planning Commission in Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, following a session of the National Economic Council.

It was chaired by the Chief Adviser, Professor Muhammad Yunus, according to local media.

The council extensively discussed the three principal responsibilities assigned to the interim government — the conduct of elections, implementation of reforms, and upholding the rule of law. The meeting also addressed the growing challenges posed by various unreasonable demands, intentional misinformation, and activities that fall beyond lawful jurisdiction, which are obstructing the normal functioning of the administration and creating confusion and mistrust among the public.

The Advisory Council emphasised the need for broader national unity to ensure stability in the country, progress with the reform agenda, uphold the judicial process, conduct fair elections, and permanently prevent the return of autocratic rule in Bangladesh.

The interim government affirmed its commitment to listening to the views of political parties on the matter and to clarifying its position transparently.

Despite numerous challenges, the government stated that it has been discharging its duties in line with the expectations of the people following the July uprising, and reiterated that it would not be deterred by group interests or undue influence.​
 

We’re in war-like situation: Yunus
At talks with parties, organisations, CA cites plots at home, abroad since AL ban

1748216207917.png


"There have been relentless efforts to destabilise the situation. We must protect ourselves from this."— Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus.

Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus yesterday said the country had been in a state of war since imposing the ban on the activities of the Awami League.

"A war-like situation emerged both inside and outside the country, preventing us from moving forward, causing everything to collapse, and pushing us back into subservience," Chief Adviser's Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam quoted Prof Yunus as saying last night.

The CA said this at meetings with political parties yesterday, according to Shafiqul.

Prof Yunus met 20 leaders of different political parties and organisations in two separate sessions at state guest house Jamuna.

The talks follow reports that Prof Yunus on Thursday expressed frustrations over some recent developments and expressed his desire to step down. BNP, Jamaat-e-Islami, and National Citizen Party leaders met separately with Yunus on Saturday.

The CA observed that the 2024 mass uprising gave the country a great opportunity to turn around, Shafiqul said.

"Since the Awami League's activities were banned [on May 12], there have been relentless efforts to destabilise the situation. We must protect ourselves from this," Yunus said.

He urged everyone to be confident that he would not do anything that may harm the country.

"I felt confident as we all sat together. If I fail to hold a fair election, I will feel guilty."

Shafiqul said party leaders reaffirmed their support to the interim government, its reform initiatives, approach to the trials of July killings, and efforts to hold a national election.

1748216258225.png

Photo: PID

The CA once again stated that he would hold the election between this December and June next year. The election will be held before June 30 and "everyone expressed their satisfaction" on the matter, Shafiqul said.

The political parties that met the CA demanded a clear roadmap to reforms, the election and trial for the July atrocities.

The leaders also said the interim government should hold trials of Awami League leaders' role in mass killings during the July uprising.

Mujahidul Islam Selim, former president of the Communist Party of Bangladesh, said the reform process should engage people and the interim government might not have enough time to implement the reform proposals.

"The election can take place after making the necessary reforms and the interim government can leave fundamental issues to the people. Unnecessary delays can further worsen the already unstable situation."

There are conspiracies at home and abroad to destroy the national unity seen during the July uprising.

Nagarik Oikya President Mahmudur Rahman Manna said "The chief adviser has said that due to Indian hegemony, the country is facing a major crisis. Therefore, he believes that the entire nation needs to be united.

"We will remain united leaving behind differences of opinion. The nation doesn't want Yunus to resign," Manna said after the meeting.

Saiful Haque, secretary of the Biplobi Workers Party, said, "This government's main mandate is to make reforms, hold the trials for the July killings and the election. The government should give clear-cut roadmaps for these tasks."

He pointed out that there was a lack of coordination among the advisers.

The decision to establish a humanitarian corridor [to provide aid to the people in Rakhine State] and hand over the operations of the Chattogram port to a foreign party should not be made by the interim government without discussions and consultations with political parties, he said.

"Prof Yunus did not make any straight comment regarding the humanitarian corridor and Chattogram port," he said.

Mojibur Rahman Monju, chairman of Amar Bangladesh Party, also emphasised the need for roadmap for reforms, trials and elections.

There is no alternative to unity among the July uprising forces, Monju added.

Rashtro Songskar Andolon Chief Coordinator Hasnat Quaiyum said the trial, reforms and elections should not be pitted against each other.

The election should be held without further delay, strictly following the announced roadmap, Hasnat said.

Ganosamhati Andolon Chief Coordinator Zonayed Saki said the controversy surrounding the advisers is undesirable.

If the two advisers of the Students Against Discrimination have political plans for the future, then a question of their resignation arises.

A specific roadmap for the election will help the political parties prepare for that.

Islami Andolon Bangladesh Ameer Rezaul Karim said, "If necessary reforms are not implemented, the nation's hope for a fair election will be jeopardised."

Bangladesh Khelafat Majlis Ameer Mamunul Haque urged the government to involve all political parties before making decisions on sensitive international matters.

Hefazat-e-Islam Secretary General Sajidur Rahman said that they informed CA that no law can be enacted contradicting the Quran and Sunnah.​
 

Government committed to ensuring religious freedom, Chief Advisor Yunus says
bdnews24.com
Published :
May 26, 2025 23:55
Updated :
May 26, 2025 23:55

1748301383770.png


Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus has reaffirmed the interim government’s commitment to safeguarding religious freedom in Bangladesh.

During a meeting with Stephen Schneck, chair of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) at the State Guest House Jamuna on Monday, he said: “The government is committed to upholding religious harmony in this country of 171 million people. We are determined to safeguard the religious freedom of every citizen.”

The Chief Adviser’s Office later said in a press release that the head of the government had invited journalists from around the world to visit Bangladesh and assess the situation firsthand following allegations of violence against minorities.

The statement quoted him as saying: “Any journalist can visit Bangladesh at any time. Many have already visited the country after the mass uprising.”

Yunus expressed concern over alleged “disinformation campaigns” under the guise of undermining minority rights and aimed at discrediting the July Uprising.

He highlighted massive efforts from external sources, including media from the South Asia region, to portray the uprising as an “Islamist extremist movement”.

The chief advisor noted that the government is striving hard to build religious harmony in the country, adding that violence targeting the minorities in the South Asia region and the genocide in Palestine have exacerbated tensions domestically.

Alongside religious freedom, the meeting focused on the government’s reform plans, constitutional amendments and the Rohingya crisis.

Schneck enquired about the activities of the reform commissions and the proposed constitutional amendments.

In response, Yunus said any constitutional changes would uphold religious freedom and minority rights and the discussion in this respect is underway with the political parties.

“Minorities will continue to enjoy the same rights as the majority Muslim population," he assured.

The chief advisor sought support from the USCIRF to highlight the plight of the Rohingya people and their prolonged persecution in Myanmar's Rakhine State.

He said the United Nations is scheduled to hold a special session on the Rohingya issue in September, following his request.

"We need to resolve the crisis. The sooner, the better, he said.

“A young generation, frustrated with anger, is growing up in the Rohingya camps. We must offer them a glimmer of hope.”​
 

People of Bangladesh enjoying full religious freedom: Mahfuj
BSS
Published :
May 26, 2025 21:11
Updated :
May 26, 2025 21:11

1748301585220.png

Information and Broadcasting Adviser Md Mahfuj Alam on Monday said that the people of Bangladesh are enjoying the highest level of religious freedom.

He made the remark during a meeting with a delegation from the US Commission on International Religious Freedom at the Industries Ministry.

Highlighting the historical context of long-standing Muslim-Hindu coexistence in the region, Mahfuj said, “Currently, no citizen in Bangladesh is being discriminated on the basis of religion. People of all faiths are enjoying equal rights.”

The adviser said the government is extending full support to ensure the smooth celebration of religious festivals across different communities.

Stating that there has been no incident of minority oppression in recent months, Mahfuj said the government has taken a firm stance to prevent such occurrences. “A vested quarter is always spreading propaganda that minority oppression is happening in Bangladesh. Everyone must raise their voice against such propaganda,” he added.

Mahfuj Alam also noted that some minority communities consider themselves allies of the Awami League (AL) and continue to work in favour of the party.

Chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom Stephen Schneck, US Embassy in Dhaka Charg, d’Affaires Megan Boldin, Political Economic Counselor Eric Gillan, and Senior Policy Analyst of the Commission Sima Hasan were present at the event.​
 

How far is the interim govt able to win confidence?

Kallol Mustafa
Updated: 26 May 2025, 15: 52

1748304261383.png


A wave of concern swept over the political arena recently when speculations spread that the chief advisor may resign out of anger and frustration.

According to a Prothom Alo report in this connection, a meeting of the advisory council held on 22 May discussed the matters of demonstrations blocking Dhaka city's roads every day, the political parties failing to reach a consensus on reforms and other issues, various quarters not cooperating with the government, and so on. At one point of the discussions the chief advisor raised the issue of not being able to work. He said, nothing tangible has been done about reforms and so what was the point of his staying on.

The chief advisor eventually didn't resign, but the issue remains hanging in the air. It has been over nine months, but no progress has been made regarding reforms. Four months have passed since the first six reforms commissions submitted their reports, but implementation has not begun. The political parties have differing stances on the question of certain fundamental reforms. But the responsibility of bringing out a consensus of the issue of reforms lies with the interim government.

If the political parties do not cooperate in this regard, the government should clarify the matter and try to mobilise public opinion on important reforms. But does the government have any initiative to take these reforms to the general public and explain their pros and cons? If not, then how will pressure be created on the unwilling political parties regarding fundamental reforms?

Questions are also being raised about whether the interim government is an NCP government or one that represents people of all views and affiliations. The neutrality of the two student advisors in the government has come under scrutiny.

Apart from the disunity among political parties on the issue of reforms, another major problem is that the actions of the government and its supporters give no indication of reforms. The bureaucracy, police, and judiciary are all functioning as before. Mass lawsuits are still being filed against people. Mass arrests have not stopped. The judiciary is not functioning independently.

Meanwhile, there has been no significant improvement in law and order. Highway robberies happen regularly. Mobs are attacking individuals and institutions. Extortion has not stopped. Along with the non-cooperation of various parties, there is also failure on the part of the government.

Take street protests, for example. It is natural for people from different classes and professions to have demands. If the government paid proper attention to these demands in a timely manner and tried to resolve them through dialogue, then these groups would not have had to take to the streets, or lay siege to Shahbagh or Jamuna.

But the fact is that until and unless there is a sit-in at Shahbagh or Jamuna, the attention of the government is not caught. Political governments have all sorts of mechanisms to listen to these demands and resolve them. But the interim government, even in nine months, has been unable to come up with any such mechanism and so the street blockades continue unabated. The government, rather, is seen to display a biased attitude in many instances.

When the National Citizens Party attempted to lay siege to Jamuna, the police behaved tolerantly. However, in the case of others, their behaviour has been aggressive. Such bias erodes public trust in the government. Arrests and baton charges are still being carried out as before to suppress labour movements. On one hand, mobs are being mobilised and achieving their demands with minimal effort, while on the other hand, people from various classes and professions are protesting day after day without receiving any attention from the government. Criminals are being released on bail, while innocent individuals, including women and children from the Bawm community, are being denied bail.

There are other problems too. The chief advisor feels that the government does not have full control over the administration, police and the election commission. There are pro-BNP elements everywhere. It is not possible to carry out a fair election under such circumstances. Professor Yunus does not want to take responsibility for such a situation. (Various parties active, advisors silent, Samakal, 24 May 2025)

The question is, who made the appointments to the police and the election commission. Without following any transparent and acceptable process, it as the government itself that made the appointments, transfers and promotions in the secretariat and all government institutions, at the behest of BNP, Jamaat, NCP and the Nagorik Committee. So they cannot shirk the responsibility.

Before the report of the electoral reform commission was even released, the election commission was formed by the current interim government. At the time, many, including the electoral reform commission itself, had said that the reform recommendations should come first, and only then should the election commission be formed in accordance with those recommendations. But instead, the government went ahead and formed the election commission following the old model, including individuals recommended by the BNP and Jamaat.

Immediately after the formation of the interim government, there were widespread transfers and promotions in various positions of the administration. Several organisations had influence behind these decisions. Did the government say at that time that it would not make appointments or transfers in the administration or police based on the preferences of different parties? You can’t plant a tree following the suggestions of the BNP, Jamaat, and NCP, and then expect to reap fruit of your own choosing. The fruit will grow according to the way the tree was planted. Therefore, whatever the administration, judiciary, or election commission does now, the responsibility will ultimately fall on the interim government.

Questions are also being raised about whether the interim government is an NCP government or one that represents people of all views and affiliations. The neutrality of the two student advisors in the government has come under scrutiny. BNP has demanded their resignation. In response, NCP has accused the government of favouring BNP and has called for the resignation of three other advisors.

Meanwhile, it appears that the far-right groups consider the interim government to be their own. Perhaps it’s not surprising that they think that way. Ever since the government came to power, they have been vandalising shrines, harassing women in public spaces, shutting down fairs, festivals, music and theater events, attacking libraries, and carrying out violence and oppression against various minority and marginalised communities. But the government has taken no strong action to stop these acts. It’s as if there’s a free-for-all going on.

It is against this backdrop that BNP and several other political parties are putting pressure on the government regarding the election. Many of them believe that this government represents a specific group. There is a perception that the government shows partiality towards NCP. When it comes to reforms, there is a disconnect between the words and actions of the government and its ally, NCP. The excessive enthusiasm of some government figures over corridors and ports has also raised suspicions.

To overcome the current situation, the government must become more sincere about reforms and justice, and that sincerity must be visible to the public. Reforms should not be limited to rhetoric. This must be reflected in the government’s actions. A election date should be announced, and attention must be focused on reforms. The interim government must become, through its actions, not a government for any particular party or group, but a government for all democratic-minded people of the country.

* Kallol Mustafa is a writer on power, energy, environment and development economics.​
 

Govt seeks help from political parties to withdraw false cases

BSS Dhaka
Published: 28 May 2025, 16: 03

1748476039089.png

Logo of law, justice, and parliamentary affairs ministry

The law, justice and parliamentary affairs ministry has sought help from the political parties’ for withdrawing the cases filed with the intent to harass the opposition political leaders and workers during the fascist regime.

The ministry made the call on Wednesday, in the backdrop of allegations from different political parties of dilly dallying by the government in withdrawing the political cases.

“The allegation has no objectivity”, a press release of the ministry said, adding the inter-ministerial committee headed by law adviser Asif Nazrul is holding regular meetings since its inception on 22 September, 2024 last.

The committee in 16 meetings so far has proposed to withdraw 11,448 political cases and further work in this connection is ongoing, it said.

The committee is recommending withdrawal of the political cases after reviewing the lists and related documents sent by district-level committees and solicitor wing of the law ministry, it pointed out.

It also said political parties’ too may send list of political cases to the inter-ministerial committee to expedite the process, it said.

“In view of this, BNP has sent a list of around 16,000 cases by 14 January, 2025, and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami has sent a list of 1,200 cases by 27 April, 2025,” the press release noted.

The inter-ministerial committee, however, acting on its own initiative already recommended withdrawing around half of those cases,” the release said.

The ministry also blamed two political parties for not sending relevant documents like first information reports (FIR) and charge-sheets (where applicable) with their case lists saying it’s the main reason for delaying the withdrawal of the cases.

“Hefazat-e-Islam Bangladesh, on the other hand, filed a list of 44 cases just on May 20, 2025. Speedy action is being taken after reviewing the documents of the cases,” it added.

The law ministry reiterated its call to the political parties for submitting the FIR and charge-sheets along with their list of the cases for their quick disposal.​
 

CA to hold next round of talks with political parties Monday

Published :
Jun 01, 2025 18:05
Updated :
Jun 01, 2025 18:05

1748823411263.png


Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus will hold the next phase of talks with political parties on Monday afternoon.

The talks are scheduled to be held at the Foreign Service Academy at 4:30 pm, Chief Adviser’s Deputy Press Secretary Abul Kalam Azad Majumder told a media briefing on Sunday, UNB reports.

Azad said all political parties engaged in the ongoing reform discussions have been invited to attend it.

He said the Chief Adviser will inaugurate the talks on Monday, and the discussions will continue thereafter. More talks are likely to be held both before and after Eid-ul-Azha, Azad added.

The National Consensus Commission has initiated its second round of discussions with political parties.

Chief Adviser’s Press Secretary Shafiqul Alam and Senior Assistant Press Secretary Ahmmad Foyez were also present.​
 

Govt working sincerely to fulfil people's expectations: Asif Nazrul

Published :
Jun 03, 2025 23:01
Updated :
Jun 03, 2025 23:01

1748993238558.png


Law Affairs Adviser Asif Nazrul on Tuesday said the government is making sincere efforts to meet the people's expectations, mentioning that the core objective of all reform initiatives is to establish good governance and the rule of law in the country.



“The government is working to ensure that future rulers cannot endanger lives through abuse of power….so that people do not become destitute due to legal complexities, that personal freedoms are not compromised in the name of civic benefits, and that citizens can live under a well-defined legal system,” he said while speaking at a views-exchange meeting on the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025 held at the Judicial Administration Training Institute in Dhaka, UNB reports.

Regarding the implementation of reform proposals submitted by various commissions, Asif Nazrul said more than a hundred recommendations have already been identified as ready for immediate implementation, and work has begun to execute them.

He expressed the hope that these reforms would be completed by August this year.

“The government has already amended several laws, including the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), Cyber Security Act, Women and Children Repression Prevention Act, and the Power of Attorney Act,” he said, adding that amendments to the Judicial Service Recruitment Rules and the National Legal Aid Services Act are also in the pipeline.

“Two separate consultation meetings have been held regarding the enactment of a law to prevent enforced disappearances, and the process is expected to be completed within the next month,” he added.

The adviser also noted that the finance and home ministries have made several legal amendments. “The reform process is already underway."

He, however, pointed out that some major reforms, especially those requiring constitutional amendments, demand political consensus.

“In such cases, we are waiting for the July Charter. Once this charter is formulated in July, it will provide the foundation for undertaking broader reforms,” he explained.

Asif Nazrul acknowledged that the nature and structure of the current government are not entirely conducive to the scale of reforms expected by society, which is why the administration is having to work extra hard to deliver.

“The government will not attempt to amend the Constitution bypassing all political parties’ consensus,” he assured.

At the meeting, Attorney General Md Asaduzzaman, Chief Prosecutor of the International Crimes Tribunal Tajul Islam, Professor of Law Department of Dhaka University Mahbubur Rahman, Supreme Court lawyer Advocate Mahbub Uddin Khokon and others expressed their opinions on various sections and sub-sections of the draft ordinance.​
 

Chief adviser doesn’t answer, only smiles: Manna
Staff Correspondent Dhaka
Published: 03 Jun 2025, 19: 34

1748995748610.png

Mahmudur Rahman Manna speaks at a discussion at the Dhaka Reporters' Unity (DRU) auditorium in Dhaka on 3 June, 2025. Prothom ALo

The president of Nagorik Oikya, Mahmudur Rahman Manna, has alleged that chief adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus does not respond even if he is asked about any issues directly.

“He hasn’t provided any explanation about his comment that only one political party wants elections. Professor Yunus doesn’t answer to anyone. Even when asked questions directly, he often avoids answering, instead bids farewell with a sweet smile or remains silent totally,” Manna said.

He made the statements while addressing a discussion on trial of mass killings, state reforms, and roadmap to election at the Dhaka Reporters Unity (DRU) on Tuesday. Gono Odhikar Parishad hosted the programme.

Raising a question, Manna said, “Only one party wants elections before December – was it appropriate for Professor Yunus to make such a claim? Does it suit his stature? Is it possible he made a mistake? Did he not know that more than one, in fact nearly 29 political parties, have already demanded elections before December? This isn’t a mistake he should be making. Yet he hasn’t offered any explanation.”

The Nagorik Oikya president noted that the chief adviser met political leaders four or five times. He often begins meetings by saying he feels optimistic after speaking with politicians. “But he does not speak about state reforms, democracy, or elections in those meetings.”

He further said even Jamaat-e-Islami wants elections in February, not June. “No major party is talking about an election in June. Then, why are they pushing for holding the election in a hostile environment in June?”

Mahmudur Rahman Manna described the ambiguity amid ongoing political tensions as highly disappointing. He also pointed out inconsistencies between the government’s statement over the much-discussed corridor and the foreign consultants’ perspective, saying that it is only creating confusion.​
 

Govt should carry out reforms, trial, BNP should also step in
15 June, 2025, 00:00

THE problem of confidence that earlier surfaced between the government and political parties centring on the time frame for the next general elections appears to have been resolved for the time being at a meeting between the chief adviser to the interim government, Muhammad Yunus, and Tarique Rahman, the acting chairperson of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, in London on June 13. Both the government, which had stood its ground for the elections in the first fortnight of April 2026 — earlier, in fact, sometime between this December and June 2026 — and the political parties, majorly the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which stood their ground for the elections by this December, have made welcome concessions. The government and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party have now resolved that the elections could be held in mid-February 2026, before Ramadan, the month of fasting for the Muslims, would begin in the second fortnight of the month. This is a welcome development in view of the uncertainties that had been persistent on the political front a couple of weeks ago.

Whilst the Bangladesh Nationalist Party appears happy about the time frame for the elections, there are still some ifs and buts. The joint statement of London suggests that the elections could take place in the week before Ramadan in 2026 provided all preparations were made by then and sufficient progress were made in the democratic reforms of the state and in the justice and accountability of the crimes committed by the Awami League government, toppled on August 5, 2024, and its people during the July–August 2024 uprising. The planned reforms of the state, initiated soon after the installation of the interim government, for a sustainable democratic transition and the trial of the people involved in crimes against humanity during the 2024 student-mass uprising for justice and accountability and effective reparations, setting out a situation for no recurrence of such crimes, are of utmost importance. The government, which earlier talked with political parties on the home ground on the time frame for the elections that caused the problem of confidence, should, meanwhile, again talk with the other political parties on the latest time frame for the general elections having been agreed on at the meeting with the acting chairperson of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party in London. The Election Commission, which also talked with political parties on the issue, should talk with the parties again before it announces the election schedule.​
 

Unemployment in Bangladesh, root cause of Uprising, persists, says Advisor Asif Mahmud

bdnews24.com
Published :
Jul 17, 2025 21:24
Updated :
Jul 17, 2025 21:24

1752795806711.png


Unemployment was at the core of the July Uprising that toppled the Awami League regime, but Bangladesh has not been able to deal with the problem, Youth Advisor Asif Mahmud Shojib Bhuyain has said.

On Thursday, Asif, a former representative of the Anti-discrimination Student Movement, said though employment issues cannot be resolved overnight, not much progress has been made.

“Given that 63 percent of our population is under the age of 35, an unprecedented figure, very few countries face a similar demographic challenge.”

Speaking at a workshop in the Bangladesh Investment Development Authority (BIDA), he acknowledged that unemployment remains “Bangladesh’s biggest challenge”, yet admitted the state has been unable to take sufficient action due to structural and capacity limitations.

“We are perhaps not being able to work at the scale and volume that is necessary, due to limitations in capacity,” said Asif.

“Still, we are trying to work efficiently and are focusing on shaping our future responses accordingly.”

While managing ministerial responsibilities, Asif also identified himself as part of the youth cohort.

“I said 63 percent of our population is youth. If we fail to properly utilise this youth segment—I am also one of them—then we can’t expect great outcomes.”

He added that current employment capacities are insufficient and urged greater support for young entrepreneurs.

“Given our real employment capacity, we must help our entrepreneurs far more than we currently do.”

Asif also stressed the need for stronger coordination across government departments and agencies to enable this support.​
 

Another govt exists inside interim govt: Debapriya Bhattacharya
Staff CorrespondentDhaka
Updated: 23 Jul 2025, 17: 53

1753320331453.png


Debapriya Bhattacharya, a distinguished fellow at the Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), addresses a roundtable at the Prothom Alo office in Karwan Bazar, Dhaka on 23 July 2025.Sazid Hossain

Debapriya Bhattacharya, a distinguished fellow at the private research organisation Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD), has said there is another government inside the incumbent interim government.

He said, “The question regarding the neutrality of the government, especially from the perspective of party allegiance, has become very important now. Because it has somewhat been clear now that, in fact, there is another government inside those who we officially see as the government. It is an open secret. The government must prove its neutrality now.”

Debapriya Bhattacharya made these remarks while addressing a roundtable at the Prothom Alo office in Karwan Bazar, Dhaka on Wednesday. Prothom Alo organised the roundtable titled ‘July mass uprising: One year experience and future’.

A one-minute silence was observed at the beginning of the event to mourn the victims of the air force fighter jet crash into the Milestone School campus in Uttara.

A one-minute silence is observed at the beginning of the roundtable titled ‘July mass uprising: One year experience and future’ organised by Prothom Alo in Karwan Bazar, Dhaka on 23 July 2025 to mourn the victims of the air force fighter jet crash into the Milestone School campus in the capital’s Uttara.

A one-minute silence is observed at the beginning of the roundtable titled ‘July mass uprising: One year experience and future’ organised by Prothom Alo in Karwan Bazar, Dhaka on 23 July 2025 to mourn the victims of the air force fighter jet crash into the Milestone School campus in the capital’s Uttara.Sazid Hossain

He said, “We brought a new government to power in the spirit of anti-discrimination, but they could not reflect the spirit of anti-discrimination in economic management and reform process. The government maintains no clear moral stance.”

“The government is mulling economic expansion and standing for the weak communities on the basis of the universal human rights, but they are yet to take measures to identify that weak community to stand beside them. Since there is a possibility of reform, this did not even cover the manufacturing entrepreneur class let alone the poor class,” he added.

Debapriya Bhattacharya said that two fundamental questions have now come to the fore. One is the issue of an interim government—meaning it has a beginning and, it must also end after a clearly defined and limited period. It is time to bring this point forward: that this is not an eternal government, but an interim one. If it is indeed an interim government, then two questions, which are unsettling everyone—at least unsettling him—must be addressed. The first is the government’s neutrality. The neutrality of the interim government has now come to the fore as a major issue.

When the issue of a government’s neutrality is spoken of, it does not refer to the fundamental ideological neutrality, because a government will stand with marginalised people. A crisis has arisen in this regard because disadvantaged communities are feeling even more vulnerable and endangered. Much like during the regime of an authoritarian government, women, religious minorities, ethnic minorities—let alone people with gender diversity—are being pushed to the margins. This has become another concern, he added.

Debapriya further said the question of the government's neutrality has now become especially important from the perspective of party allegiance.

"This issue has gained importance because it has become fairly clear that the people we formally see as the government are not the only ones running it; there is another government within it. It is an open secret now that there is another government within government," he added.

Debapriya said the core power within the government is now so influential that the formal government cannot always act even within its desired jurisdiction.

So the need to reestablish the government's neutrality has become urgent, the CPD distinguished pointed out.

Raising a question on whether the interim government can even hold a fair election, Debapriya Bhattacharya said, “A real election is essential—not an election based on compromises, backroom deals, or seat-sharing, where people will live in peace after casting vote, as well the days after election. This leads to the second major concern: maintaining peace and security during the election. We have understood very well that this cannot be achieved through just administrative power or existing law enforcement agencies. This will not be possible without a significant role for the military. I simply understand the military would need to be deployed for three to four months and must begin by recovering illegal arms. Similarly, the military may need to work jointly with the local administration in other ways.”

In that case, the military will require a little more direct and active role going beyond the traditional roles of ‘in aid to civil administration’ or as a ‘striking force’, Debapriya said adding, the relationship between the government and the military has become a cause for public concern. As a result, the government’s neutrality and capability are now the two biggest questions.

“Since this is an interim government, the government should now prepare a desk-clearing list. If the honourable chief adviser delivers a speech to the nation, I expect that he will clarify how he intends to conclude his role. The chief adviser should clearly outline which reform initiatives he plans to complete, and where he expects to contribute or participate,” he added.

Debapriya further said that reform is an ongoing process. Political leaders must now present their election manifestos. Civil society, media, and entrepreneurs should engage in discussion or even protest on those manifestos, if necessary. The country will remain, the people will remain, but governments will come and go. With that mindset, the nation must move from this current transitional phase to the next stage.

“I feel it was more important to focus on the next year’s exit strategy —what it should be and what is needed to make it happen, rather than reviewing the past year,” he added.

Writer and thinker Farhad Mazhar; Hossain Zillur Rahman, executive chairman of Power and Participation Research Centre (PPRC); Anu Muhammad, member of Ganatantrik Odhikar Committee and former professor of Jahangirnagar University; senior Supreme Court lawyer Sara Hossain; writer and researcher Altaf Parvez; professor Saeed Ferdous; filmmaker Kamar Ahmad Saimon; writer and political analyst Zahed Ur Rahman; writer and researcher Maha Mirza; and research specialist at Press Institute of Bangladesh Sahul Ahmed, among others, participated in the event.​
 

Interim govt committed to restoring state power to people: Prof Yunus

UNB
Published :
Aug 04, 2025 17:51
Updated :
Aug 04, 2025 17:51

1754350808792.png


Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus on Monday said the interim government is committed to restoring the state power to people through a peaceful, fair and transparent election, as part of a sustainable political solution.

In a message on the occasion of the July Uprising Day, he also said, “To accelerate our democratic journey, dialogue continues with political parties and stakeholders on necessary reforms, including the political and electoral systems.”

The Chief Adviser called upon all to stand united beyond all divisions to confront and defeat all threats to the nation. “Together, we will build a Bangladesh where tyranny will never rise again.”

He said July rekindled the nation’s hope, a hope for a just, equal and corruption-free Bangladesh.

Prof Yunus said the sacrifice of thousands has gifted the country’s people this rare opportunity for national reform, and it must be protected at any cost.

He also warned that the fallen autocrats and their self-serving allies remain active, conspiring to derail the country’s progress.

“Today marks an unforgettable chapter in the history of Bangladesh. It was on this very day, one year ago, that the July Uprising reached its triumph, liberating our beloved nation from the grip of long-standing fascist rule,” the Chief Adviser said.

He extended his heartfelt congratulations to the people of Bangladesh whose united struggle brought about this historic achievement.

“On this solemn day, I remember with deep reverence the brave youth, workers, labourers and professionals who sacrificed their lives while confronting the fascist forces. My profound respect goes to every martyr of the uprising,” Prof Yunus said.

He also remembered with deep gratitude all the July warriors who were injured, permanently disabled and even lost their eyesight. “The nation shall forever honour their sacrifices.”

Stating that the July Uprising was a collective eruption against sixteen years of oppressive authoritarian misrule, the Chief Adviser said, “At its core, it was a fight to establish a new system free from discrimination, corruption and tyranny. The goal was to restore democracy and return the country to the hands of its people.”

Since assuming responsibility, he said the interim government has undertaken extensive reform efforts across all sectors of the state to fulfill these aspirations.

“The trials related to the July killings are progressing swiftly. Measures have been initiated to preserve the memory of the July martyrs and rehabilitate the injured July fighters,” the Chief adviser added.​
 

Interim government: How can it meet its commitment?
Syed Hasibuddin Hussain
Published: 04 Aug 2025, 08: 34

1754355692289.png

Chief advisor of the interim government Professor Muhammad Yunus

Awami League loyalists who have fled and are in hiding, continue to claim that the Yunus government is unelected and illegal, and that they do not even have the authority to declare the date for the forthcoming election.

On the other hand, some intellectuals and many from the more impassioned ranks of the movement, argue that since a revolution has taken place and the current government is the outcome of a collective popular will, it is not only legitimate but is in fact duty-bound to discard the old system entirely and rebuild the country with a new constitution.

Our experience, however, suggests that this government itself does not believe it has the authority to start from scratch or to make any bold decisions. Foreign agencies and investors have sensed this weakness and are refraining from entering into any agreements until an elected government is in place.

Meanwhile, they too understand that an interim government lacks the clear-cut legitimacy to sign binding deals. Even when this government receives proposals from reform commissions it has formed itself, it makes no effort to implement them. Instead, it shelves them for the next government. That indicates it does not consider itself authorised to carry out reforms either.

When Hasina fled, the public was relieved when army chief Wakar-Uz-Zaman stepped in to take control of the situation, because a power vacuum at the heart of the state threatens national stability. Later, when Prof Yunus assumed charge under the stewardship of President Shahabuddin Chuppu, people felt reassured to see a legitimate civilian government in power.

The problem remains that even if a constituent assembly is elected, that alone may not be enough to prevent the return of autocracy, because the elected representatives in that assembly may choose not to prioritise that.

The legitimacy of this interim government stemmed from the continuity of the existing constitution. Yet, although that continuity was preserved, the Yunus government’s authority ultimately derived from the uprising itself. And since the uprising was not merely about changing power but about ensuring that autocracy could never return, the Yunus government’s legitimacy lay in its mandate to prevent the restoration of dictatorship.

The question is: what are the limits of this interim government's legitimate authority? Since the interim government was formed within the continuity of the existing constitution, it does not have the authority to amend that constitution. And because it has no legislature or parliament, it also lacks the power to make laws. However, as the executive head of the state, the interim government does have the authority to issue decrees.

The question is, can they use decrees to carry out the necessary reforms to ensure that autocracy does not return? The answer is, no. Without constitutional and legal reforms, they cannot prevent the return of authoritarianism.

To change laws, a parliament is required. Since this government does not have an elected parliament, it can attempt to organise parliamentary elections and, through that elected body, enact the necessary legislation. But changing laws alone will not be enough to prevent a return to dictatorship. Fundamental constitutional reform is required to restore a balance of power.

It is under the current constitution that members of parliament take their oath, and therefore, they do not have the mandate to alter the constitution fundamentally. Their power extends only to amendments. Fundamental reforms to the constitution can only be made by an especially empowered body of elected representatives, what is known as a constituent assembly.

Since it is not drafting an entirely new constitution, we may also refer to this body as a constitutional reform assembly. The purpose of electing a constituent assembly is either to draft a new constitution or to carry out fundamental reforms of the existing one.

That means if the interim government merely holds an election to transfer power, it does not fulfill its full mandate. But if it holds an election for a constituent assembly to reform the constitution, then it sets the path toward fulfilling its responsibility.

However, the problem remains that even if a constituent assembly is elected, that alone may not be enough to prevent the return of autocracy, because the elected representatives in that assembly may choose not to prioritise that goal.

The solution to this problem can be found in the history of our own region. After the fall of Ayub Khan, the need to resolve the constitutional imbalance between West and East Pakistan became urgent. That’s why, when Yahya Khan announced the 1970 election, he issued the Legal Framework Order (LFO), under which the election was intended to form a constituent assembly. The objectives of that constituent assembly were clearly outlined in the LFO.

That means the way for this interim government to fulfill its promise is to formulate a new Legal Framework Order and hold elections for a constituent assembly. Fortunately, the July Charter being drafted by the Consensus Commission reflects a consensus among all political parties.

This charter could serve as today’s Legal Framework Order. A constituent assembly formed on the basis of this charter would be obligated to implement all the reforms outlined in the July Charter. And if that happens, the interim government’s pledge would be fulfilled and it would be able to step down with dignity by transferring power to an elected government under the newly reformed constitution.

* Syed Hasibuddin Hossain is an activist of the Rasthra Sangskar Anodolan​
 

Interview: Asif Nazrul
Conscious effort is made not to take sides with any party
Law Adviser Asif Nazrul during an interview with Prothom Alo

1754529240747.png

Professor Asif Nazrul is the law adviser to the interim government. In an interview with Prothom Alo, he speaks on a range of issues, including the government’s successes and failures over the past year, justice for the July killings, indiscriminate cases and arrests, mob violence, allegations of political bias, social inequality, the Pay Commission for public servants, elections, and the ban on Awami League activities. The interview was taken by Rajib Ahmed on 1 August at the official residence of the Law Adviser. Today we present the second part of the interview.

Prothom Alo: The government will complete one year at the helm on 8 August. Is there any possibility of reshuffling based on performance? You would perhaps agree that some advisers have done well, while others have not quite measured up.

Asif Nazrul
We face a lot of criticism, often quite harsh. But when I look at everyone individually, many among us are doing a very good job. Our economic adviser, Salehuddin Ahmed bhai, energy adviser, Fouzul Kabir bhai, and trade adviser, Sheikh Bashiruddin bhai are all doing well. Our religious affairs adviser AFM Khalid Hossain bhai has done an excellent job with Hajj management. I could name others too.

As for failures, it would not be appropriate for me to name names, that is for you to judge.

But we all have a sense, from Sir’s (Professor Yunus’) body language and his way of working, how much he values each of our contributions.

Prothom Alo: Let me ask a follow-up question. During the previous government’s tenure, we saw that no matter how much criticism there was, Sheikh Hasina never replaced anyone. She didn’t take heed of any criticism. Will this government follow the same path?

Asif Nazrul
No, but then some of the criticism is extremely harsh. If someone is to be removed on the basis of that kind of criticism, then criticism could start against everyone.

Prothom Alo : But isn’t there also reasonable, valid criticism?

Asif Nazrul
In such cases, things have to be considered in totality. For instance, something may seem like reasonable criticism, but if Sir (Professor Yunus) is not convinced, based on intelligence reports or other information, then taking action might discourage the concerned persons.
Some of us may have shortcomings, or be accused of inexperience. But have you heard of any allegations of corruption? There may be some campaigns against one or two individuals, but those aren’t based on proven facts. Do you hear accusations that we don’t show up to work? That we engage in nepotism? You don’t.

Prothom Alo: We've heard that some advisers show up at the office after 2 PM. We're only talking about one or two individuals, no one is saying the entire advisory council should go.

Asif Nazrul
I'm not quite aware of that.

Prothom Alo : When it comes to decision-making and discussions in the advisory council, is there ever a concern that outsiders might get to know what's being discussed?

Asif Nazrul
I don’t think so. There is no gap between the army and the government. It is for the election commission to decide if during the election more responsibility needs to be given to the army.

Prothom Alo : Given concerns about law and order and possible disruptions to the election, do you believe you will be able to deliver a free and fair election?

Asif Nazrul
Absolutely, we will.

Prothom Alo : Some say that without a more active role by the army, it won’t be possible to hold a fair election. There's also talk of a distance between the military and the government.

Asif Nazrul
There is absolutely no distance, rest assured. These are simply far-fetched speculations. In fact, some external forces have unfairly tried to blame the army in certain situations. Speaking as someone who was on the ground during the mass uprising, I can say that although the army is a branch of the government, it played a supportive role in the uprising as a whole. Sadly, some segments of society do not respect that. Yes, it’s possible that, in isolated cases, some individuals within the army may have engaged in reprehensive acts, but overall, their role was highly commendable. What I’m saying is, there is no gap between the army and the government. It is for the election commission to decide if during the election more responsibility needs to be given to the army.

Prothom Alo: Does the government have any partiality towards the new party, National Citizen Party (NCP)? Many say two government advisers are affiliated with them.

Asif Nazrul
At the decisive moment of the mass uprising, it was undoubtedly led by students, no one can deny that. When our government was formed, I remember hearing criticism about why there were so few student advisers. So when some friends of those student advisers formed a party, it may have seemed in some instances that the government was giving NCP special privileges. But in reality, that is not so.

Because of their leading role in the uprising, NCP is highly vulnerable. That is why they’ve been given extra security in places like Gopalganj and a few other areas. BNP and Jamaat are long-established, well-organised parties. NCP is not. If something happens to them, if they’re attacked anywhere, will the public forgive us?

Prothom Alo : From the way NCP leaders speak, they hardly seem vulnerable.

Asif Nazrul
In my view, a newly formed party can have many supporters, but they still don’t have many organisers or much experience. There’s another reason they need protection: NCP leaders are likely to be the first targets of the fallen Awami League.

We have intelligence reports indicating that Awami League instigated several protests against the government, including unrest involving Ansar personnel. There is credible evidence supporting this.

Prothom Alo: What would you say in response to the claim that you are distant from BNP but close to the religion-based parties? BNP secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir has expressed concern about the rise of right-wing forces.

Asif Nazrul
During the 15 years of Awami League rule, the religion-based parties were subjected to severe injustice and repression.

Prothom Alo : BNP too has been a victim of injustice and repression.

Asif Nazrul
Among centrist parties, it’s BNP. But in terms of numbers, the religion-based parties are greater. They have endured extreme persecution, arrests, disappearances, and they played a significant role during the July uprising. Naturally, we have to engage with them.

Prothom Alo : Engagement is expected. But the question is, are you closer to them than to the BNP?

Asif Nazrul
Some say we’re close to NCP, others say to the religious parties. After the London meeting between Professor Yunus and BNP’s acting chairman Tarique Rahman, some even claimed that the government is close to BNP. But when it comes to decision-making, we consciously and deliberately avoid taking the side of any party.

Prothom Alo : In some rallies, there were threats made to behead members of civil society. Yet no action was taken. Why?

Asif Nazrul
I think the police, who were supposed to take action, thought this was just political rhetoric. Taking action might provoke extremism further, and it might not be good for the safety of those involved. From what I’ve seen, the people who were threatened haven’t really reduced their public engagement. When running the state, you sometimes have to consider whether taking action might escalate things further.

Prothom Alo: Awami League's activities are now banned. Many people support the ban remaining in effect until the trials are over. But some are asking whether an executive order preventing Awami League from contesting the elections might raise questions abroad.

Asif Nazrul Those who want to raise questions will raise them anyway. But just look, there is no remorse within Awami League. On the contrary, their leader and other senior figures are claiming we committed the massacre and are openly declaring that if they return to power, they will take revenge and hang us.

Can you run a country while allowing political activities by a party that talks like this and tries to create chaos whenever it gets the chance? Can you bring them to justice under such conditions? It would create a completely unmanageable situation, plunging the country into violence and bloodshed. That would open the door for other destructive forces in Bangladesh to interfere. This concern is very real and, I believe, entirely justified.

Prothom Alo : Some people are saying that instead of banning the Awami League through executive orders, it would be more effective to let the people reject them themselves.

Asif Nazrul
That’s true, being rejected by the people carries even more impact. But we genuinely fear that if Awami League remains active, not just in elections but in politics more broadly, it will become impossible to hold elections or even govern the country. We have intelligence reports indicating that Awami League instigated several protests against the government, including unrest involving Ansar personnel. There is credible evidence supporting this.

Prothom Alo: The government sent mangoes to India, and dispatched physicians after the Indian fighter jet crash. We're seeing fewer anti-India statements from the advisers these days. How are relations with India?

Asif Nazrul
We do not want to be India’s enemy, but we don’t want to be its servant either. We want a relationship based on mutual respect and equality.

To be continued.................
 
Prothom Alo : The government has reportedly written to India about carrying out the Teesta project with Chinese funding. Was this discussed in the Advisory Council?

Asif Nazrul
Sometimes such issues are discussed in the Advisory Council, sometimes in the “kitchen cabinet” of a few advisers, and sometimes Sir (Professor Yunus) calls us individually to consult. No such major decision is made by any adviser alone.

Prothom Alo : Do you or your government ever feel pressured or influenced by Facebook users or YouTubers? You yourself once said that if such pressure is ignored, smear campaigns begin.

Asif Nazrul
Social media pressure exists everywhere in the world to some extent. These days, people can write whatever they want. There's no enforcement of the Digital Security Act, no fear of arrest or threats. But I personally do not make decisions based on Facebook or YouTube. It's possible that one or two individuals might be troubled by a specific campaign online and may try to act, or avoid acting, accordingly. But that’s not how decisions should be made.

Prothom Alo: The UN Human Rights Office is opening a mission in Dhaka. Yet, under your ministry, the National Human Rights Commission has been without a chairman for eight months.

Asif Nazrul
That’s a fair criticism. The current Human Rights Commission is almost toothless, you could say. There are serious problems in the law itself. With so many other reforms underway, we haven’t yet been able to reform the Commission. A major overhaul of the law is necessary before appointing anyone. There’s no point appointing someone just to fill a seat. But we will act on this very soon.

Prothom Alo : Some say what Bangladesh really needs is reconciliation. You’ve spoken about a Reconciliation Commission. You and the Chief Justice recently visited South Africa. There, justice was served, and people asked each other for forgiveness. Will we move toward reconciliation or remain trapped in endless division and conflict?

Asif Nazrul
In South Africa, the white population was genuinely remorseful. That remorse led them to seek reconciliation. But do you see any remorse among our perpetrators? How can you reconcile with those who show no regret?

Prothom Alo: Those you refer to will come under the purview of justice. But beyond them, there are countless Awami League leaders, workers, and supporters.

Asif Nazrul
Action is not being taken against the entire population. Reconciliation involves several concepts. One is truth-seeking, which we are doing. Second, memorialisation, for that, we are establishing the July Museum. Third, reparation. That is being provided. And fourth, justice. Reconciliation comes after these four processes. The justice process has begun. If, after that, the environment for reconciliation emerges, if not under this government, then perhaps under the next, such possibilities can be considered.

Prothom Alo: Without reconciliation, are we doomed to remain trapped in a cycle of division and revenge?
Asif Nazrul
Reconciliation is a truly valuable concept in any context. We needed reconciliation right after the Liberation War. We needed it after the pro-democracy movement of the 1990s. But reconciliation requires a favourable environment. How can you build goodwill with those who harmed you if they show no remorse?

Prothom Alo : We need a Nelson Mandela. Who besides Professor Yunus could be that leader?

Asif Nazrul
Opposite Mandela, there was also a leader like De Klerk. Look at the role De Klerk played. Mandela didn’t bring about reconciliation and the end of apartheid alone.

We’ve been studying reconciliation efforts in South Africa, Sri Lanka, and other countries. A formal initiative may later come from the Chief Justice. Let the discussion continue among the people.

Prothom Alo : Thank you.

Asif Nazrul
Thank you too.​
 

Govt ready to hand over power to elected representatives: CA

Published :
Aug 12, 2025 21:03
Updated :
Aug 12, 2025 21:03

1755043480758.png


Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus on Tuesday said the government is now ready to hand over power to the elected representatives, as it has already announced the election timeframe.

“We are now ready to hand over power to the elected representatives. I have already announced the election time,” he said while exchanging views with Bangladeshi expatriates in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The Chief Adviser said the government is working to ensure the voting rights of expatriates in this election, reports BSS.

“I hope this time you will have a new experience. You will all be voters and will be able to vote. We have discussed this issue with the Election Commission. They are taking preparations,” he added.

Prof Yunus expressed gratitude to the Bangladeshi expatriates in Malaysia for their important contribution to the economy of Bangladesh.

“You are making a huge contribution to the economy. We have to recognise your contribution. We have to ensure the voting rights of expatriates in the next election.”

Foreign Affairs Adviser Md Touhid Hossain and Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas Employment Adviser Professor Asif Nazrul were also present at the meeting.

The Chief Adviser said since assuming office, the government tried to discuss with the expatriates and listen to their words.

“You have many complaints, some of which are fair. We are continuously trying to resolve these problems. We are trying to reduce the complications,” he said.

He also said the government has taken very quick measures to resolve the passport-related complications and the ‘Nagorik Seba Bangladesh’ initiative is being taken to provide all government services to the expatriates.

In addition, work is underway to create a special app for expatriates so that all Bangladeshi expatriates living in different countries of the world can stay connected on one platform, the Chief Adviser said.

Referring to the role of expatriates in Bangladesh’s economic recovery from the devastating situation, he said the situation in the country has now returned to a comfortable state. “You have made a big contribution to the recovery of the economy.”

Several problems of Bangladeshi expatriates in Malaysia were discussed in the meeting.

Among those, discussions have been held with Malaysian authorities on increasing manpower at the embassy, granting Graduate Plus visas to Bangladeshi students, regularising those who have become irregular, and cooperation in the trade and industry sectors, said Expatriate Welfare Adviser Asif Nazrul.

Representatives from different professions, classes, organisations, and businesses participated in the meeting.​
 

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle
⬆️ Top
Read Watch Wars