Why are you not tired saying it to your imbecile fello lungi billo.
Did you?
Dramay na kar.
Uniting Nations Through Defense and Political Dialogue
Defending Freedom of Expression!
- Thread starter Saif
- Start date
- Replies 137
- Views 2K
Bangladesh Defense ForumWhy are you not tired saying it to your imbecile fello lungi billo.
Did you?
Dramay na kar.
Ye dekh tera double digit IQ lungi.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #123
Padma, Ganges: Combined water measurement begins
Bangladesh and India are set to start measuring the water level in the Padma and Ganges rivers today as per the Ganges Water Sharing Treaty 1996.
Padma, Ganges: Combined water measurement begins
Photo: Sheikh Mehedi Morshed
Bangladesh and India are set to start measuring the water level in the Padma and Ganges rivers today as per the Ganges Water Sharing Treaty 1996.
A two-member Indian team comprising of India's Central Water Commission Executive Engineer Muttath Leo Franklin and Assistant Director Ritesh Kumar will begin measurement of the water in the 3,500 feet upstream of Hardinge Bridge point of the Padma.
A two-member team of Bangladesh led by Pabna Hydrology Executive Engineer Md Rezaul Karim will start the water measurement at the Farakka point in India.
Md Jahedul Islam, acting executive engineer of the regional hydrology department in Pabna, said, "Starting from tomorrow [today], both teams will continue monitoring of the water level until May 31."
"We have already given letters to the Pabna superintendent of police office and the Kushtia superintendent of police office for taking necessary security measures ahead of the joint monitoring work," he said.
Photo: Sheikh Mehedi Morshed
Bangladesh and India are set to start measuring the water level in the Padma and Ganges rivers today as per the Ganges Water Sharing Treaty 1996.
A two-member Indian team comprising of India's Central Water Commission Executive Engineer Muttath Leo Franklin and Assistant Director Ritesh Kumar will begin measurement of the water in the 3,500 feet upstream of Hardinge Bridge point of the Padma.
A two-member team of Bangladesh led by Pabna Hydrology Executive Engineer Md Rezaul Karim will start the water measurement at the Farakka point in India.
Md Jahedul Islam, acting executive engineer of the regional hydrology department in Pabna, said, "Starting from tomorrow [today], both teams will continue monitoring of the water level until May 31."
"We have already given letters to the Pabna superintendent of police office and the Kushtia superintendent of police office for taking necessary security measures ahead of the joint monitoring work," he said.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #124
‘Dam’ disregard deepens downstream discontent
WATER disputes between nations frequently emerge from managing shared hydrological resources, mainly when an upstream riparian state exerts control over the source and implements large-scale infrastructural initiatives that may disrupt downstream flow dynamics. India’s extensive hydropower...
www.newagebd.net
‘Dam’ disregard deepens downstream discontent
Simon Mohsin 09 January, 2025, 00:00
The Brahmaputra Basin. | Institute for Water Modelling
WATER disputes between nations frequently emerge from managing shared hydrological resources, mainly when an upstream riparian state exerts control over the source and implements large-scale infrastructural initiatives that may disrupt downstream flow dynamics. India’s extensive hydropower projects on the River Brahmaputra and its tributaries in Arunachal Pradesh have prompted legitimate concern in Bangladesh, a downstream riparian state.
Bangladesh fears that these developments could critically undermine its water security, with potential repercussions for environmental stability and social cohesion. While the objectives of India’s energy generation and flood mitigation strategies are not inherently flawed, such undertakings necessitate an elevated level of responsibility and proactive consultation to maintain regional hydro-political equilibrium. Bangladesh’s concern about India’s upstream hydropower projects on the Brahmaputra is multifaceted, primarily related to water security and environmental impact. According to a US-based Centre for Naval Analyses study, the Brahmaputra supplies 75 per cent of Bangladesh’s river water during the dry season, a critical resource for its agriculture and security. However, Bangladesh already faces a 25 per cent deficit in its required water intake. This situation could worsen because of India’s dam-building activities and water diversion projects upstream.
The water-sharing dynamics between India and Bangladesh have for long been marked by tension, particularly surrounding the Teesta waters accord, which has become a pivotal point of dispute. Despite extensive negotiations, a formal agreement regarding the River Teesta, a vital resource for the agriculture-dependent north of Bangladesh, remains elusive. Under the administration of Sheikh Hasina, there was a period of relative stability in Bangladesh-India relations, with significant expectations for the finalisation of the Teesta accord. However, various political obstacles, especially at the regional level in India, have hindered progress, exacerbating Bangladesh’s apprehension regarding India’s overall water-sharing commitments across transboundary river systems.
After the recent change in government in Dhaka, the future of the collaborative spirit that characterised Hasina’s regime remains in doubt, albeit somewhat uneven. The new leadership in Bangladesh might take a more cautious and assertive approach, particularly concerning the Brahmaputra hydropower projects and the ongoing Teesta issue. Rebuilding the strong bilateral ties developed under Hasina’s administration could be slow, necessitating careful diplomacy. For India, balancing its energy ambitions with Bangladesh’s water security concern will be vital in deciding whether this shared resource will become a source of cooperation or conflict again. There are already signs that India could be jeopardising its relationship with Bangladesh, especially with narratives of unchecked sectarian violence emerging since Sheikh Hasina’s departure. These discussions tend to overlook Hasina’s manipulation of the Hindu minority and the fact that much of the post-uprising violence has been more politically motivated.
In a move to boost the region’s energy capacity, India has recently taken significant steps to advance its hydropower ambitions in the northeastern state of Arunachal Pradesh. It committed $1 billion to expedite the construction of 12 hydropower projects on tributaries of the Brahmaputra. This large-scale initiative underscores India’s commitment to developing its hydropower potential as part of its broader energy security and sustainability strategy.
The 12 projects form only a tiny part of India’s larger vision for Arunachal Pradesh, which has an estimated hydropower potential of more than 57,000MW. The projects are strategically planned on various tributaries of major rivers. India’s investment in hydropower development, particularly in its northeastern regions, aims at harnessing the Brahmaputra’s hydropower potential, estimated at more than 57,000MW. These projects also serve as a geopolitical statement, reinforcing India’s sovereignty over regions that China has intermittently laid claim to. While India’s motivations are clear, the unilateral approach to these projects has raised eyebrows. As these dams are built on a river that flows into Bangladesh, the downstream impact causes a grave concern.
Beyond water shortage, Bangladesh also faces the heightened risk of flash floods. India’s release of stored water from its dams could cause flooding in densely populated, low-lying areas, a situation that Bangladesh has been victim to annually. The broader ecological impact, such as disruption to local ecosystems and biodiversity and potential displacement of communities, adds to Bangladesh’s concern. Moreover, despite the northeastern region’s limited demand, India’s plans to transmit electricity generated from these hydropower projects through Bangladesh have sparked further controversy. The Siliguri corridor, the chicken’s neck, poses technical challenges because of the infrastructure, adding strain to Bangladesh’s infrastructure and security. Bangladesh’s installed power generation capacity stands at 28,166MW while the maximum demand recorded by the Power Development Board in 2024 was 17,200MW. This indicates that the power sector has a surplus generation capacity of 38.9 per cent. It raises questions about the necessity of such transmission lines, creating an additional layer of diplomatic tension between the two countries.
International water law, underpinned by principles such as equitable and reasonable use and not to cause significant harm, calls for cooperation between riparian states. Bangladesh has consistently advocated using established diplomatic frameworks, like the Joint River Commission, to resolve water-sharing disputes and ensure that its interests are considered. However, India’s unilateral decisions on the Brahmaputra have been perceived as dismissive of this collaborative approach, intensifying concerns in Dhaka. As the upper riparian state, India carries more significant responsibility. Given the shared nature of the Brahmaputra, India should adopt a more consultative stance, engaging with Bangladesh to placate its concern and actively incorporate them into project planning. A holistic, sustainable approach to managing the river’s resources could benefit both nations, provided trust and transparency are prioritised.
While water security is a pressing issue, it is inextricably linked to broader geopolitical dynamics in South Asia. India’s position as the upper riparian state gives it considerable leverage over its neighbours. Treaties, such as the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 between India and Pakistan, exemplify how water can become both a tool of diplomacy and a potential source of conflict. Although the treaty has held for decades, India’s recent moves to renegotiate specific key provisions point to the enduring complexities of such agreements. India’s move to renegotiate parts of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan signals its shifting approach to water diplomacy. This renegotiation, driven by geopolitical tensions, raises concern about other regional water-sharing agreements, including those with Bangladesh. If the precedent set by the Indus treaty holds, future agreements might increasingly be influenced by regional power dynamics rather than mutual necessity.
In the context of the Brahmaputra, long-term treaties between India and Bangladesh should not be treated as diplomatic bargaining chips. While geopolitical realities cannot be ignored, essential resources like water must not be used as leverage in negotiations concerning trade, border disputes or broader regional security issues. Stable water-sharing agreements are fundamental to peace and cooperation and must withstand transient political and diplomatic fluctuations.
Water disputes are not new in South Asia. Still, their importance has increased as resource demand grows alongside environmental degradation and climate change. As the upper riparian state, India must acknowledge Bangladesh’s legitimate concern. Transparent dialogue, mutual respect and a commitment to sustainable development can transform water from a source of conflict into an avenue for cooperation in South Asia. India and Bangladesh can ensure long-term stability in a region fraught with challenges by fostering trust and creating inclusive frameworks for managing shared rivers.
On the same note, Bangladesh faces a dual threat as China, another riparian state, is also building a dam on the Brahmaputra portions that fall within the Chinese borders. On November 30, 2020, China’s major hydropower project on the Brahmaputra, River Yarlung Zangbo, in Tibet raised concern in India and Bangladesh as the river flows through the two countries. The dam will be built at a massive gorge in the Himalayan reaches. The Brahmaputra makes a massive U-turn to flow into Arunachal Pradesh and then to Bangladesh. The project is raising concerns in riparian states such as India and Bangladesh. India’s 12 projects are likely to have geopolitical and geostrategic implications on countering China’s efforts. Nevertheless, both the countries need to consider the impact of their respective projects on Bangladesh. In contrast, Bangladesh needs to reinforce its diplomatic efforts through all available avenues to ensure that the country can mitigate the ensuing effects of these projects.
Simon Mohsin is a political and international affairs analyst.
Simon Mohsin 09 January, 2025, 00:00
The Brahmaputra Basin. | Institute for Water Modelling
WATER disputes between nations frequently emerge from managing shared hydrological resources, mainly when an upstream riparian state exerts control over the source and implements large-scale infrastructural initiatives that may disrupt downstream flow dynamics. India’s extensive hydropower projects on the River Brahmaputra and its tributaries in Arunachal Pradesh have prompted legitimate concern in Bangladesh, a downstream riparian state.
Bangladesh fears that these developments could critically undermine its water security, with potential repercussions for environmental stability and social cohesion. While the objectives of India’s energy generation and flood mitigation strategies are not inherently flawed, such undertakings necessitate an elevated level of responsibility and proactive consultation to maintain regional hydro-political equilibrium. Bangladesh’s concern about India’s upstream hydropower projects on the Brahmaputra is multifaceted, primarily related to water security and environmental impact. According to a US-based Centre for Naval Analyses study, the Brahmaputra supplies 75 per cent of Bangladesh’s river water during the dry season, a critical resource for its agriculture and security. However, Bangladesh already faces a 25 per cent deficit in its required water intake. This situation could worsen because of India’s dam-building activities and water diversion projects upstream.
The water-sharing dynamics between India and Bangladesh have for long been marked by tension, particularly surrounding the Teesta waters accord, which has become a pivotal point of dispute. Despite extensive negotiations, a formal agreement regarding the River Teesta, a vital resource for the agriculture-dependent north of Bangladesh, remains elusive. Under the administration of Sheikh Hasina, there was a period of relative stability in Bangladesh-India relations, with significant expectations for the finalisation of the Teesta accord. However, various political obstacles, especially at the regional level in India, have hindered progress, exacerbating Bangladesh’s apprehension regarding India’s overall water-sharing commitments across transboundary river systems.
After the recent change in government in Dhaka, the future of the collaborative spirit that characterised Hasina’s regime remains in doubt, albeit somewhat uneven. The new leadership in Bangladesh might take a more cautious and assertive approach, particularly concerning the Brahmaputra hydropower projects and the ongoing Teesta issue. Rebuilding the strong bilateral ties developed under Hasina’s administration could be slow, necessitating careful diplomacy. For India, balancing its energy ambitions with Bangladesh’s water security concern will be vital in deciding whether this shared resource will become a source of cooperation or conflict again. There are already signs that India could be jeopardising its relationship with Bangladesh, especially with narratives of unchecked sectarian violence emerging since Sheikh Hasina’s departure. These discussions tend to overlook Hasina’s manipulation of the Hindu minority and the fact that much of the post-uprising violence has been more politically motivated.
In a move to boost the region’s energy capacity, India has recently taken significant steps to advance its hydropower ambitions in the northeastern state of Arunachal Pradesh. It committed $1 billion to expedite the construction of 12 hydropower projects on tributaries of the Brahmaputra. This large-scale initiative underscores India’s commitment to developing its hydropower potential as part of its broader energy security and sustainability strategy.
The 12 projects form only a tiny part of India’s larger vision for Arunachal Pradesh, which has an estimated hydropower potential of more than 57,000MW. The projects are strategically planned on various tributaries of major rivers. India’s investment in hydropower development, particularly in its northeastern regions, aims at harnessing the Brahmaputra’s hydropower potential, estimated at more than 57,000MW. These projects also serve as a geopolitical statement, reinforcing India’s sovereignty over regions that China has intermittently laid claim to. While India’s motivations are clear, the unilateral approach to these projects has raised eyebrows. As these dams are built on a river that flows into Bangladesh, the downstream impact causes a grave concern.
Beyond water shortage, Bangladesh also faces the heightened risk of flash floods. India’s release of stored water from its dams could cause flooding in densely populated, low-lying areas, a situation that Bangladesh has been victim to annually. The broader ecological impact, such as disruption to local ecosystems and biodiversity and potential displacement of communities, adds to Bangladesh’s concern. Moreover, despite the northeastern region’s limited demand, India’s plans to transmit electricity generated from these hydropower projects through Bangladesh have sparked further controversy. The Siliguri corridor, the chicken’s neck, poses technical challenges because of the infrastructure, adding strain to Bangladesh’s infrastructure and security. Bangladesh’s installed power generation capacity stands at 28,166MW while the maximum demand recorded by the Power Development Board in 2024 was 17,200MW. This indicates that the power sector has a surplus generation capacity of 38.9 per cent. It raises questions about the necessity of such transmission lines, creating an additional layer of diplomatic tension between the two countries.
International water law, underpinned by principles such as equitable and reasonable use and not to cause significant harm, calls for cooperation between riparian states. Bangladesh has consistently advocated using established diplomatic frameworks, like the Joint River Commission, to resolve water-sharing disputes and ensure that its interests are considered. However, India’s unilateral decisions on the Brahmaputra have been perceived as dismissive of this collaborative approach, intensifying concerns in Dhaka. As the upper riparian state, India carries more significant responsibility. Given the shared nature of the Brahmaputra, India should adopt a more consultative stance, engaging with Bangladesh to placate its concern and actively incorporate them into project planning. A holistic, sustainable approach to managing the river’s resources could benefit both nations, provided trust and transparency are prioritised.
While water security is a pressing issue, it is inextricably linked to broader geopolitical dynamics in South Asia. India’s position as the upper riparian state gives it considerable leverage over its neighbours. Treaties, such as the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 between India and Pakistan, exemplify how water can become both a tool of diplomacy and a potential source of conflict. Although the treaty has held for decades, India’s recent moves to renegotiate specific key provisions point to the enduring complexities of such agreements. India’s move to renegotiate parts of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan signals its shifting approach to water diplomacy. This renegotiation, driven by geopolitical tensions, raises concern about other regional water-sharing agreements, including those with Bangladesh. If the precedent set by the Indus treaty holds, future agreements might increasingly be influenced by regional power dynamics rather than mutual necessity.
In the context of the Brahmaputra, long-term treaties between India and Bangladesh should not be treated as diplomatic bargaining chips. While geopolitical realities cannot be ignored, essential resources like water must not be used as leverage in negotiations concerning trade, border disputes or broader regional security issues. Stable water-sharing agreements are fundamental to peace and cooperation and must withstand transient political and diplomatic fluctuations.
Water disputes are not new in South Asia. Still, their importance has increased as resource demand grows alongside environmental degradation and climate change. As the upper riparian state, India must acknowledge Bangladesh’s legitimate concern. Transparent dialogue, mutual respect and a commitment to sustainable development can transform water from a source of conflict into an avenue for cooperation in South Asia. India and Bangladesh can ensure long-term stability in a region fraught with challenges by fostering trust and creating inclusive frameworks for managing shared rivers.
On the same note, Bangladesh faces a dual threat as China, another riparian state, is also building a dam on the Brahmaputra portions that fall within the Chinese borders. On November 30, 2020, China’s major hydropower project on the Brahmaputra, River Yarlung Zangbo, in Tibet raised concern in India and Bangladesh as the river flows through the two countries. The dam will be built at a massive gorge in the Himalayan reaches. The Brahmaputra makes a massive U-turn to flow into Arunachal Pradesh and then to Bangladesh. The project is raising concerns in riparian states such as India and Bangladesh. India’s 12 projects are likely to have geopolitical and geostrategic implications on countering China’s efforts. Nevertheless, both the countries need to consider the impact of their respective projects on Bangladesh. In contrast, Bangladesh needs to reinforce its diplomatic efforts through all available avenues to ensure that the country can mitigate the ensuing effects of these projects.
Simon Mohsin is a political and international affairs analyst.
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
I read with great interest ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta’s latest National Interest column, an open letter to Dr Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to Bangladesh’s interim government. Before responding to the article, I want to clarify my personal and professional association with Dr Yunus.
Expert MarketRemarkable Dash Cams
Ad
My association with him began in 2014 when I first met him, and it deepened in 2016 when I invited him to deliver a Nobel Laureate Lecture at Kuwait University. On both occasions, I had the privilege of interviewing him for Kuwait Times and producing a four-part documentary on his incredible journey and the global impact of his work. These interactions allowed me to see Yunus as an accomplished intellectual and a compassionate leader deeply committed to humanitarian values.
Dr Muhammad Yunus is admired by political and business leaders across the world for his unparalleled contributions to social and economic development. He represents a unique combination of intellectual brilliance and unshakeable moral integrity. His leadership is deeply anchored in the principles of dignity and empowerment for marginalised groups. His ideals transcend boundaries, bringing new dimensions to solving some of the world’s biggest problems.
Sponsored CollectionsGluten Free Bread
Ad
Dear Shekhar Gupta, your open letter to Yunus was thought-provoking and reflected a fine grasp of the complex socio-political terrain of South Asia. However, many of your assertions deserve closer and more balanced examination, particularly regarding Bangladesh’s political trajectory, its relationship with India, and the overwhelming support Yunus commands from diverse communities. With this in mind, I address these points to provide a more holistic view based on personal experience and wider context.
You have portrayed India as a friendly and helpful neighbour, but this does not consider the deep-seated feeling in Bangladesh about India gaining disproportionately from the bilateral relationship. Indeed, during Sheikh Hasina’s rule, India has enjoyed certain privileges, including:
- One-sided beneficial trade and connectivity: Bangladesh provides India access to the northeastern states through its territory, allows transit routes, and imports Indian goods when the trade is heavily skewed toward India.
- Water-sharing agreements: The long-overdue Teesta River water-sharing agreement has still not been settled, which also creates discontent among Bangladeshis over India’s exploitative reluctance.
- Border killings: The continuing border incidents with the Border Security Force (BSF) have resulted in heavy losses, adding to anti-India sentiment.
Degree®Our MotionSense® Technology Is Specially Designed To Keep You Fresh And Odor-Free.
Ad
Your assertion that Hasina was deeply unpopular is supported by her administration’s association with alleged electoral manipulation and suppression of dissent. However, it is crucial to understand why her government’s overt alignment with Indian interests exacerbated public dissatisfaction:
- Perception of dependency: Many Bangladeshis believe Hasina’s policies excessively prioritised Indian interests at the expense of national sovereignty.
- Energy agreements and FDI: Controversial agreements granting Indian companies access to Bangladesh’s energy sector often lacked transparency, further alienating the populace. In this context, Prof. Yunus’s leadership has been hailed as a breath of fresh air, promising a more balanced and self-reliant Bangladesh.
- Champion of empowerment: Yunus founded Grameen Bank and thus changed the course of millions of lives, many of them marginal women, by providing microfinance. His initiatives have earned him respect from all quarters.
- Symbol of integrity: He signifies integrity and transparency in a political landscape full of corruption and cronyism. His international stature and status as a Nobel laureate raise his profile as a unifying figure. Yunus’ popularity is premised on people’s aspiration for governance, which is committed to safeguarding Bangladesh’s interests without adopting an adversarial approach toward her neighbours.
- Mutual respect and reciprocity: Bangladesh seeks a partnership based on mutual benefit, whereby India acknowledges and addresses its concerns rather than expecting unconditional allegiance.
- Cultural sensitivity: India must approach Bangladesh with respect for its sovereignty and avoid actions perceived as hegemonic, ensuring that the relationship is built on equal footing.
Also read: Bangladesh is becoming a security threat to India. Yunus govt is stoking anti-India politics
Your apprehensions regarding Yunus’ long-term goals and governance are understandable. Yet, his priorities, as stated, include restoring democratic institutions, free and fair elections, and a transparent governance framework that upholds the principles of accountability. Unlike power-hungry leaders, Yunus has repeatedly emphasised the need for reform of institutions rather than feeding individual ambitions.
I want to take up the appeal that Bangladesh should try to maintain a cooperative relationship with India as a good neighbour. Though I am in principle agreeable to such fostering of amicable ties, I cannot get rid of the question: on what foundational basis is such a relationship to be built? It is befitting to reflect upon why India has not been able to maintain cordial relations with most of its neighbours in the SAARC region, including Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even Bhutan. The common thread through these strained relationships is India’s perceived “big brother” approach and hegemonistic tendencies that often create an imbalance in mutual respect and equitable cooperation. Otherwise, without a resolution of these issues, no goodwill can last.
Finally, Bangladesh’s journey under Yunus has reached a point where his leadership is a prelude to balanced diplomacy, democratic restoration, and national self-reliance. For India, the most important neighbour, this juncture provides an opportunity for consolidating the relationship through genuine cooperation and not a threat to her interests.
Your letter to Yunus reminds me that history, politics, and diplomacy are in a balancing act. Let us hope all the stakeholders come forward to help create a future where mutual respect and shared prosperity define the region.
Serajul I. Bhuiyan is a Professor and former Chair, the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications, Savannah State University, Savannah, Georgia, USA. Views are personal.
(Edited by Ratan Priya)
- 41
Live Mint
Follow
111.1K Followers
Donald Trump's inauguration: Invitation sent to XI, prominent tech leaders; is PM Modi attending? Check list here
Story by Sanchari Ghosh• 4h • 2 min read
Trump's Inauguration: Tech and Business Leaders Set to Attend January 20 Event
As Donald Trump will take oath as the 47th President of the United States on January 20, several prominent personalities, including politicians, tech leaders, business leaders, and other prominent leaders, will attend his inauguration event. Check the full list here:
Prominent tech leaders invited: who are attending?
According to sources close to the organisers, Meta Platforms Inc CEO Mark Zuckerberg plans to attend the event.OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman is also likely to attend. In addition to Altman, OpenAI President Greg Brockman and Chief Product Officer Kevin Weil will also attend the inauguration, according to a company spokesperson.
Trump said at a press conference last month that Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google co-founder Sergey Brin met with him at Mar-a-Lago, though Google has not confirmed the meeting.
Uber Technologies Inc CEO Dara Khosrowshahi will attend some of the surrounding festivities, according to the company. Uber also plans to host an inauguration party in Washington with Elon Musk’s X social media firm and The Free Press, a media company.
Coinbase Global Inc CEO Brian Armstrong has been invited to events around the inaugural, including a presidential dinner, the company said.
During his first term, Trump clashed with Silicon Valley on issues such as immigration and online content moderation. He was not on best terms with executives such as Zuckerberg and Amazon.com Inc founder Jeff Bezos.
However, recently, both Meta and Amazon pledged to donate $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund. Zuckerberg and Bezos have also dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Altman, meanwhile, personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund after having previously given money to President Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign.
Related video: Donald Trump’s Inauguration: EAM Jaishankar to Join Meloni, Javier Milei in Grand Celebrations (Oneindia (Video))Play Video
Oneindia (Video)
Donald Trump’s Inauguration: EAM Jaishankar to Join Meloni, Javier Milei in Grand CelebrationsUnmute
0
0
Invites sent to world leaders: Is PM Modi attending?
Live Mint
Mint PremiumInvest Smart: Insights by Experts, Curated & InteractiveSubscribe Now
Visit Live MintIndian stock market falls in 6 of 9 sessions in January: How should you rejig your portfolio now?
OnePlus 13 vs iPhone 16: Which latest flagship smartphone you should buy
Republic Day 2025: Is it the 76th or 77th Republic Day on 26 January? Know here
Sponsored Content
More for You
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
Opinion by Serajul Bhuiyan• 6h • 5 min read
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
I read with great interest ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta’s latest National Interest column, an open letter to Dr Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to Bangladesh’s interim government. Before responding to the article, I want to clarify my personal and professional association with Dr Yunus.
Sponsored CollectionsBirthday Gift Baskets
Ad
My association with him began in 2014 when I first met him, and it deepened in 2016 when I invited him to deliver a Nobel Laureate Lecture at Kuwait University. On both occasions, I had the privilege of interviewing him for Kuwait Times and producing a four-part documentary on his incredible journey and the global impact of his work. These interactions allowed me to see Yunus as an accomplished intellectual and a compassionate leader deeply committed to humanitarian values.
Dr Muhammad Yunus is admired by political and business leaders across the world for his unparalleled contributions to social and economic development. He represents a unique combination of intellectual brilliance and unshakeable moral integrity. His leadership is deeply anchored in the principles of dignity and empowerment for marginalised groups. His ideals transcend boundaries, bringing new dimensions to solving some of the world’s biggest problems.
Attachments
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
Opinion by Serajul Bhuiyan
• 6h • 5 min read
View attachment 12955
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
I read with great interest ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta’s latest National Interest column, an open letter to Dr Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to Bangladesh’s interim government. Before responding to the article, I want to clarify my personal and professional association with Dr Yunus.
Sponsored CollectionsBirthday Gift Baskets
Ad
My association with him began in 2014 when I first met him, and it deepened in 2016 when I invited him to deliver a Nobel Laureate Lecture at Kuwait University. On both occasions, I had the privilege of interviewing him for Kuwait Times and producing a four-part documentary on his incredible journey and the global impact of his work. These interactions allowed me to see Yunus as an accomplished intellectual and a compassionate leader deeply committed to humanitarian values.
Dr Muhammad Yunus is admired by political and business leaders across the world for his unparalleled contributions to social and economic development. He represents a unique combination of intellectual brilliance and unshakeable moral integrity. His leadership is deeply anchored in the principles of dignity and empowerment for marginalised groups. His ideals transcend boundaries, bringing new dimensions to solving some of the world’s biggest problems.
Now BD should intensify BOYCOTT India campaign. They should learn from Pakistan. They boycotted Indian goods at government level. It is a different matter that they end up buying Indian goods via UAE. There is a time for BD to show courage and officially ban all imports from India.
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
India has disproportionately benefited from Bangladesh. Yunus govt is balancing that
I read with great interest ThePrint Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta’s latest National Interest column, an open letter to Dr Muhammad Yunus, the Chief Adviser to Bangladesh’s interim government. Before responding to the article, I want to clarify my personal and professional association with Dr Yunus.
Expert MarketRemarkable Dash Cams
Ad
My association with him began in 2014 when I first met him, and it deepened in 2016 when I invited him to deliver a Nobel Laureate Lecture at Kuwait University. On both occasions, I had the privilege of interviewing him for Kuwait Times and producing a four-part documentary on his incredible journey and the global impact of his work. These interactions allowed me to see Yunus as an accomplished intellectual and a compassionate leader deeply committed to humanitarian values.
Dr Muhammad Yunus is admired by political and business leaders across the world for his unparalleled contributions to social and economic development. He represents a unique combination of intellectual brilliance and unshakeable moral integrity. His leadership is deeply anchored in the principles of dignity and empowerment for marginalised groups. His ideals transcend boundaries, bringing new dimensions to solving some of the world’s biggest problems.
Sponsored CollectionsGluten Free Bread
Ad
Dear Shekhar Gupta, your open letter to Yunus was thought-provoking and reflected a fine grasp of the complex socio-political terrain of South Asia. However, many of your assertions deserve closer and more balanced examination, particularly regarding Bangladesh’s political trajectory, its relationship with India, and the overwhelming support Yunus commands from diverse communities. With this in mind, I address these points to provide a more holistic view based on personal experience and wider context.
You have portrayed India as a friendly and helpful neighbour, but this does not consider the deep-seated feeling in Bangladesh about India gaining disproportionately from the bilateral relationship. Indeed, during Sheikh Hasina’s rule, India has enjoyed certain privileges, including:
India’s hegemonic influence on Bangladesh
While India has played a role in Bangladesh’s liberation and development, its perceived disregard for equitable reciprocity undermines the goodwill between the two nations.
- One-sided beneficial trade and connectivity: Bangladesh provides India access to the northeastern states through its territory, allows transit routes, and imports Indian goods when the trade is heavily skewed toward India.
- Water-sharing agreements: The long-overdue Teesta River water-sharing agreement has still not been settled, which also creates discontent among Bangladeshis over India’s exploitative reluctance.
- Border killings: The continuing border incidents with the Border Security Force (BSF) have resulted in heavy losses, adding to anti-India sentiment.
Degree®Our MotionSense® Technology Is Specially Designed To Keep You Fresh And Odor-Free.
Ad
Your assertion that Hasina was deeply unpopular is supported by her administration’s association with alleged electoral manipulation and suppression of dissent. However, it is crucial to understand why her government’s overt alignment with Indian interests exacerbated public dissatisfaction:
Sheikh Hasina’s alignment with Indian interests
- Perception of dependency: Many Bangladeshis believe Hasina’s policies excessively prioritised Indian interests at the expense of national sovereignty.
- Energy agreements and FDI: Controversial agreements granting Indian companies access to Bangladesh’s energy sector often lacked transparency, further alienating the populace. In this context, Prof. Yunus’s leadership has been hailed as a breath of fresh air, promising a more balanced and self-reliant Bangladesh.
Your labeling of Yunus as an “accidental leader” totally underestimates the organic, grassroots support that he enjoys from Bangladeshis on the ground.
Overwhelming public support for Yunus
- Champion of empowerment: Yunus founded Grameen Bank and thus changed the course of millions of lives, many of them marginal women, by providing microfinance. His initiatives have earned him respect from all quarters.
- Symbol of integrity: He signifies integrity and transparency in a political landscape full of corruption and cronyism. His international stature and status as a Nobel laureate raise his profile as a unifying figure. Yunus’ popularity is premised on people’s aspiration for governance, which is committed to safeguarding Bangladesh’s interests without adopting an adversarial approach toward her neighbours.
Your suggestion that anti-India feelings are being exploited as a political tool by Yunus’s government deserves scrutiny. While forging constructive ties with India is necessary, it is equally important to address the genuine grievances of the Bangladeshi people:
India-Bangladesh relations: A call for equitability
Yunus’ leadership offers an opportunity to reset and reframe this bilateral relationship, emphasising cooperation while safeguarding Bangladesh’s interests.
- Mutual respect and reciprocity: Bangladesh seeks a partnership based on mutual benefit, whereby India acknowledges and addresses its concerns rather than expecting unconditional allegiance.
- Cultural sensitivity: India must approach Bangladesh with respect for its sovereignty and avoid actions perceived as hegemonic, ensuring that the relationship is built on equal footing.
Also read: Bangladesh is becoming a security threat to India. Yunus govt is stoking anti-India politics
Your apprehensions regarding Yunus’ long-term goals and governance are understandable. Yet, his priorities, as stated, include restoring democratic institutions, free and fair elections, and a transparent governance framework that upholds the principles of accountability. Unlike power-hungry leaders, Yunus has repeatedly emphasised the need for reform of institutions rather than feeding individual ambitions.
A Vision for the future
I want to take up the appeal that Bangladesh should try to maintain a cooperative relationship with India as a good neighbour. Though I am in principle agreeable to such fostering of amicable ties, I cannot get rid of the question: on what foundational basis is such a relationship to be built? It is befitting to reflect upon why India has not been able to maintain cordial relations with most of its neighbours in the SAARC region, including Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and even Bhutan. The common thread through these strained relationships is India’s perceived “big brother” approach and hegemonistic tendencies that often create an imbalance in mutual respect and equitable cooperation. Otherwise, without a resolution of these issues, no goodwill can last.
Finally, Bangladesh’s journey under Yunus has reached a point where his leadership is a prelude to balanced diplomacy, democratic restoration, and national self-reliance. For India, the most important neighbour, this juncture provides an opportunity for consolidating the relationship through genuine cooperation and not a threat to her interests.
Your letter to Yunus reminds me that history, politics, and diplomacy are in a balancing act. Let us hope all the stakeholders come forward to help create a future where mutual respect and shared prosperity define the region.
Serajul I. Bhuiyan is a Professor and former Chair, the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications, Savannah State University, Savannah, Georgia, USA. Views are personal.
(Edited by Ratan Priya)
Live Mint
Follow
111.1K Followers
Donald Trump's inauguration: Invitation sent to XI, prominent tech leaders; is PM Modi attending? Check list here
Story by Sanchari Ghosh
• 4h • 2 min read
Trump's Inauguration: Tech and Business Leaders Set to Attend January 20 Event
As Donald Trump will take oath as the 47th President of the United States on January 20, several prominent personalities, including politicians, tech leaders, business leaders, and other prominent leaders, will attend his inauguration event. Check the full list here:
Prominent tech leaders invited: who are attending?
According to sources close to the organisers, Meta Platforms Inc CEO Mark Zuckerberg plans to attend the event.
OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman is also likely to attend. In addition to Altman, OpenAI President Greg Brockman and Chief Product Officer Kevin Weil will also attend the inauguration, according to a company spokesperson.
Trump said at a press conference last month that Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google co-founder Sergey Brin met with him at Mar-a-Lago, though Google has not confirmed the meeting.
Uber Technologies Inc CEO Dara Khosrowshahi will attend some of the surrounding festivities, according to the company. Uber also plans to host an inauguration party in Washington with Elon Musk’s X social media firm and The Free Press, a media company.
Coinbase Global Inc CEO Brian Armstrong has been invited to events around the inaugural, including a presidential dinner, the company said.
During his first term, Trump clashed with Silicon Valley on issues such as immigration and online content moderation. He was not on best terms with executives such as Zuckerberg and Amazon.com Inc founder Jeff Bezos.
Continue reading
However, recently, both Meta and Amazon pledged to donate $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund. Zuckerberg and Bezos have also dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Altman, meanwhile, personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund after having previously given money to President Joe Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign.
Play Video
Oneindia (Video)
Donald Trump’s Inauguration: EAM Jaishankar to Join Meloni, Javier Milei in Grand Celebrations
Unmute
0
View on Watch
Invites sent to world leaders: Is PM Modi attending?
Live MintMint PremiumInvest Smart: Insights by Experts, Curated & Interactive
Subscribe Now
Indian stock market falls in 6 of 9 sessions in January: How should you rejig your portfolio now?
OnePlus 13 vs iPhone 16: Which latest flagship smartphone you should buy
Republic Day 2025: Is it the 76th or 77th Republic Day on 26 January? Know here
Sponsored Content
More for You
Jayshankar will attend instead.
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
Bangladesh to skip India Meteorological Department’s 150-year celebration
Story by PTI• 1d • 2 min read
Bangladesh to skip India Meteorological Department’s 150-year celebration
Bangladeshi officials will not attend the 150th-anniversary celebrations of the India Meteorological Department (IMD), authorities have said, citing restrictions on non-essential foreign travel at government expense.
Mominul Islam, the acting director of the Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD), on Friday confirmed receiving the invitation from the IMD a month ago, saying: “The India Meteorological Department invited us to their 150th-anniversary celebrations. We maintain good relations and continue to collaborate with them.” “However, we are not going to the event as there is an obligation to limit non-essential foreign trips funded by the government,” Islam told bdnews 24.
He emphasised the regular contact between the two agencies, noting his recent visit to India on December 20, 2024, for a separate meeting with Indian meteorologists.
The IMD invited several neighbouring nations — including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives — and countries from the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
A top IMD official told PTI: “We have asked all the countries that were part of India when IMD was launched (150 years ago) to join this festival.” “Pakistan has already agreed to join the event, but Bangladesh has not responded.” Founded in 1875 during British colonial rule, the IMD was established in response to devastating weather events, including the cyclone that ravaged Kolkata in 1864 and subsequent monsoon-related disasters in 1866 and 1871.
Related video: India Bangladesh Border | Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry Summons Indian High Commissioner | N18G (News18)
India Bangladesh Border | Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry Summons Indian High Commissioner | N18G
Unmute
0
View on Watch
More videos
WION'Bangladesh strategically important to India': Indian Army chief
3:09
2:49
2:09
Also read | Dev Pragad, Indian-origin CEO of Newsweek, lauds diaspora's success in the West
Initially headquartered in Kolkata, the IMD relocated several times, moving to Shimla in 1905, Pune in 1928, and eventually Delhi in 1944. The department will officially mark its sesquicentennial on January 15, 2025.
Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.
Situation across LAC 'sensitive but stable': Indian army chief says patrolling, grazing restarted
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
Bangladesh to skip India Meteorological Department’s 150-year celebration
Story by PTI
• 1d • 2 min read
View attachment 12958
Bangladesh to skip India Meteorological Department’s 150-year celebration
Bangladeshi officials will not attend the 150th-anniversary celebrations of the India Meteorological Department (IMD), authorities have said, citing restrictions on non-essential foreign travel at government expense.
Mominul Islam, the acting director of the Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD), on Friday confirmed receiving the invitation from the IMD a month ago, saying: “The India Meteorological Department invited us to their 150th-anniversary celebrations. We maintain good relations and continue to collaborate with them.” “However, we are not going to the event as there is an obligation to limit non-essential foreign trips funded by the government,” Islam told bdnews 24.
He emphasised the regular contact between the two agencies, noting his recent visit to India on December 20, 2024, for a separate meeting with Indian meteorologists.
The IMD invited several neighbouring nations — including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives — and countries from the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
A top IMD official told PTI: “We have asked all the countries that were part of India when IMD was launched (150 years ago) to join this festival.” “Pakistan has already agreed to join the event, but Bangladesh has not responded.” Founded in 1875 during British colonial rule, the IMD was established in response to devastating weather events, including the cyclone that ravaged Kolkata in 1864 and subsequent monsoon-related disasters in 1866 and 1871.
News18
India Bangladesh Border | Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry Summons Indian High Commissioner | N18G
Unmute
0
View on Watch
More videos
3:09
2:49
2:09
Also read | Dev Pragad, Indian-origin CEO of Newsweek, lauds diaspora's success in the West
Initially headquartered in Kolkata, the IMD relocated several times, moving to Shimla in 1905, Pune in 1928, and eventually Delhi in 1944. The department will officially mark its sesquicentennial on January 15, 2025.
Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.
Situation across LAC 'sensitive but stable': Indian army chief says patrolling, grazing restarted
Too much unnecessary provocation from BD side. India should consider action.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #131
It is India who is to be blamed for provocation. Just read the name of the conference. It is 'Undivided India'. Why should Bangladesh, an independent country, should join such trash conference? By the by, what action can India take against Bangladesh for not joining a conference organized by India?
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
See, what lucky bisht adviced to BD
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
If I am not wrong, BD participate in common wealth games.
- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #134
A good portion of your politicians are of the opinion that Pakistan and Bangladesh should come back to India's lap to form 'Undivided India'. Being an independent country Bangladesh cannot accept such concept. Commonwealth does not have such plan so participating in commonwealth games does not breach our sovereignty.
- Jan 26, 2024
- 1,008
- 181
- Axis Group
Believe me my friend,
We don't want those pieces of land with the population they have. we are fed up with these Indian Muslims. An irresistible , treacherous community by and large. We don't want more liability. It is a different matter that now they have started receiving the treatment they deserve. Once we neutralize them, we can think of Akhand Bharat but it is atleast 5 decades away.
Similar threads
Latest Posts
-
-
-
[🇧🇩] India's Water Terrorism Against Bangladesh
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
-
[🇨🇳] China Launches the Type 076 LHD 'Sichuan' - Its New Aircraft Carrier!
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
South Asia Muslim names of 11 villages changed to Hindu ones
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[🇮🇳] In first, India is developing hypersonic cruise missiles interceptor.
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
[🇧🇩] Artificial Intelligence-----It's challenges and Prospects in Bangladesh
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
-
-
-
South Asia Indian Railway, Tracking the news, progress and development.
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
[🇮🇳] Indian Navy takes delivery of sixth and last Scorpene-class submarine Vaghsheer
- Latest: Krishna with Flute
-
-
