[🇧🇩] Indus Water Treaty---Is there anything to learn for Bangladesh?

[Saif]

India says it will never restore Indus water treaty with Pakistan

India will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Islamabad, and the water flowing to Pakistan will be diverted for internal use, Home Minister Amit Shah said in an interview with Times of India on Saturday. India put into "abeyance" its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the usag

thefinancialexpress.com.bd

India says it will never restore Indus water treaty with Pakistan

REUTERS
Published :
Jun 21, 2025 19:04
Updated :
Jun 21, 2025 19:04

People walk next to a cultivated land on the dry riverbed of the Indus River in Hyderabad, Pakistan April 25, 2025. Photo : REUTERS/Yasir Rajput/Files

India will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Islamabad, and the water flowing to Pakistan will be diverted for internal use, Home Minister Amit Shah said in an interview with Times of India on Saturday.

India put into "abeyance" its participation in the 1960 treaty, which governs the usage of the Indus river system, after 26 civilians in Indian Kashmir were killed in what Delhi described as an act of terror. The treaty had guaranteed water access for 80 per cent of Pakistan's farms through three rivers originating in India.

Pakistan has denied involvement in the incident, but the accord remains dormant despite a ceasefire agreed upon by the two nuclear-armed neighbours last month following their worst fighting in decades.

"No, it will never be restored," Shah told the daily.

"We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably," Shah said, referring to the northwestern Indian state.

The latest comments from Shah, the most powerful cabinet minister in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's cabinet, have dimmed Islamabad's hopes for negotiations on the treaty in the near term.

Last month, Reuters reported that India plans to dramatically increase the water it draws from a major river that feeds Pakistani farms downstream, as part of retaliatory action.

Pakistan's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comments.

But it has said in the past that the treaty has no provision for one side to unilaterally pull back and that any blocking of river water flowing to Pakistan will be considered "an act of war".

Islamabad is also exploring a legal challenge to India's decision to hold the treaty in abeyance under international law.​

 

[Saif]

Pakistan accuses India of weaponising water after treaty suspension

Pakistan said on Thursday two river projects by arch-rival India would ‘weaponise’ water and violate a major treaty between the neighbouring nations, threatening a response if they move ahead.

www.newagebd.net

Pakistan accuses India of weaponising water after treaty suspension
Agence France-Presse . Islamabad, Pakistan 05 June, 2026, 01:13

Pakistan said on Thursday two river projects by arch-rival India would ‘weaponise’ water and violate a major treaty between the neighbouring nations, threatening a response if they move ahead.

India, which has announced the two initiatives separately this year, insists it is within its rights to press ahead with projects on the waters it controls, even though rivers flowing though both countries would be impacted.

Pakistan’s foreign ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi told journalists that New Delhi had not consulted Islamabad on the two Chenab River projects that he said would undermine the Indus Water Treaty.

‘These projects confirm that India seems to weaponise water,’ he said. ‘This carries dangerous implications not only for Pakistan’s economy but also for regional stability and international peace and security.’

India announced last year it was suspending the bilateral Indus Water Treaty that governs the use of waterways relied on by hundreds of millions, in the lead up to armed conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours.

Andrabi, however, said the treaty still binds both governments.

Pakistan has previously said it would consider any attempt to change the flow of cross-border waterways an ‘act of war’ and said there was no mechanism for either country to unilaterally withdraw from the 1960 pact that had survived three armed hostilities.

In May, India’s government-owned National Hydroelectric Power Corporation issued a tender notice for a proposed tunnel project that would transfer water from the Chenab River to the Beas basin.

India’s power ministry said in January it was undertaking ‘sediment removal’ at Salal Power Station on the Chenab River ‘following the termination of the Indus Waters Treaty’.

Andrabi said that ‘any illegal measure to endanger Pakistan’s water, food and economic security as well as the survival and wellbeing of its 250 million people is unacceptable.’

‘Pakistan will retain all options necessary for safeguarding rights under the treaty and to protect its vital national interest,’ he said, without elaborating on a course of action.

Water risks becoming a flashpoint in a region grappling with climate change and population growth, which are stretching resources in the agricultural sectors that form the backbone of both countries’ economies, experts say.

India’s foreign ministry rejected a May 15 decision by what it termed the ‘illegally constituted so-called Court of Arbitration’ — the Hague-based body used to resolve disputes between India and Pakistan related to the treaty.

Pakistan said the decision supported its stance that the treaty remained in effect, which New Delhi denied.

‘India’s decision to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance remains in force,’ New Delhi’s foreign ministry said.

The water treaty provided a rare avenue of diplomatic engagement between the rival sides until India suspended its involvement following a deadly attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir in April 2025.

New Delhi blamed Islamabad for backing the attack, which Islamabad denies.

The two countries engaged in intense drone, missile and artillery exchanges the following month which left nearly 70 people dead on both sides.​