Iranian Defense- Copy to clipboard
- Thread starter
- #91
Saif
Senior Member
- Messages
- 14,145
- Reaction score
- 7,446
- Origin
- Residence
- Axis Group
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
Experts say the attacks are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
Iranian Red Crescent volunteers working in a Tehran neighbourhood hit by a reported Israeli strike. Photo: Iranian Red Crescent / AFP
Israel's strikes on Iran have taken aim at its nuclear facilities, amid fears that the Islamic republic is seeking to develop nuclear weapons -- an accusation Tehran denies.
Experts told AFP that while the attacks might have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear programme, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow.
What is the extent of the damage?
Israel's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and a uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing information from Iranian officials.
IAEA said on Friday that a key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed, also citing Iranian officials.
There was "extensive" damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organisation specialising in nuclear proliferation, which analysed satellite images.
A loss of electricity to underground facilities can significantly damage the site's centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, the ISIS institute said.
If backup power is lost, "at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being", it said.
Iran has said the damage to Fordow, south of Tehran, was minor.
But experts said it is impossible at this stage to determine the impact the strikes might have had on uranium stockpiles believed to be stored around the Isfahan site.
Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to "secret facilities," then "the game is lost for Israel".
Can the programme be destroyed?
While "Israel can damage Iran's nuclear programme... it is unlikely to be able to destroy it", Vaez said, arguing that Israel does not have the massively powerful bombs needed "to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow".
Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association.
She also stressed that Israel's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists.
- What are the risks to the Iranian population? -
The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites.
"There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release," said Davenport.
But an attack on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, could "have a serious impact on health and the environment", she added.
After Israel launched its strikes, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked" and that targeting Iranian sites could have "grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond".
Is Iran close to developing a nuclear bomb?
After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment.
As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes enriched to up to 60 percent -- just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.
Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA.
Iran is the only non nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.
While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there is "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme".
Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads.
But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal.
"Israel's strikes set Iran back technically, but politically the strikes are pushing Iran closer to nuclear weapons," she said.
Iranian Red Crescent volunteers working in a Tehran neighbourhood hit by a reported Israeli strike. Photo: Iranian Red Crescent / AFP
Israel's strikes on Iran have taken aim at its nuclear facilities, amid fears that the Islamic republic is seeking to develop nuclear weapons -- an accusation Tehran denies.
Experts told AFP that while the attacks might have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear programme, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow.
What is the extent of the damage?
Israel's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and a uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing information from Iranian officials.
IAEA said on Friday that a key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed, also citing Iranian officials.
There was "extensive" damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organisation specialising in nuclear proliferation, which analysed satellite images.
A loss of electricity to underground facilities can significantly damage the site's centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, the ISIS institute said.
If backup power is lost, "at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being", it said.
Iran has said the damage to Fordow, south of Tehran, was minor.
But experts said it is impossible at this stage to determine the impact the strikes might have had on uranium stockpiles believed to be stored around the Isfahan site.
Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to "secret facilities," then "the game is lost for Israel".
Can the programme be destroyed?
While "Israel can damage Iran's nuclear programme... it is unlikely to be able to destroy it", Vaez said, arguing that Israel does not have the massively powerful bombs needed "to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow".
Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association.
She also stressed that Israel's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists.
- What are the risks to the Iranian population? -
The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites.
"There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release," said Davenport.
But an attack on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, could "have a serious impact on health and the environment", she added.
After Israel launched its strikes, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked" and that targeting Iranian sites could have "grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond".
Is Iran close to developing a nuclear bomb?
After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment.
As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes enriched to up to 60 percent -- just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.
Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA.
Iran is the only non nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.
While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there is "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme".
Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads.
But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal.
"Israel's strikes set Iran back technically, but politically the strikes are pushing Iran closer to nuclear weapons," she said.
