Saif
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2024
- Messages
- 17,239
- Likes
- 8,332
- Nation

- Residence

- Axis Group

Trade-off between macro-economic stability and growth
Is there a paradox between growth and macro-economic stability? In normal circumstances they are considered complementary-one reinforcing the other; but asking which comes as the foremost priority may lead to answers that would tend to vary from place to place reflecting the various dimension
Trade-off between macro-economic stability and growth
WASI AHMED
Published :
Jun 04, 2024 23:16
Updated :
Jun 04, 2024 23:16
Is there a paradox between growth and macro-economic stability? In normal circumstances they are considered complementary-one reinforcing the other; but asking which comes as the foremost priority may lead to answers that would tend to vary from place to place reflecting the various dimensions characterising economies. Is it appropriate to say that while macro-economic stability of a country is the precondition for economic growth, the latter may not necessarily be indicative of the former? The trade-off between the two is not simple enough.
Macroeconomic stability can be defined and measured in different dimensions including real, nominal and external stability. To speak of the most important one, real stability is related to sustained and stable growth in economic activity and employment, and is measured by business cycle indicators, such as the unemployment rate or the output gap. Macroeconomic stability is often considered a buffer against currency and interest fluctuations in the global market. Exposure to currency fluctuations, large debt burdens, and unmanaged inflation can cause economic crises and a collapse of GDP. It is here that macro-economic stability features as the foundation of an economy. Economists consider five variables to measure macro-economic stability. These include low and stable inflation, low long-term interest rates, low national debt relative to GDP, low deficits, and currency stability.
To read the rest of the news, please click on the link above.
WASI AHMED
Published :
Jun 04, 2024 23:16
Updated :
Jun 04, 2024 23:16
Is there a paradox between growth and macro-economic stability? In normal circumstances they are considered complementary-one reinforcing the other; but asking which comes as the foremost priority may lead to answers that would tend to vary from place to place reflecting the various dimensions characterising economies. Is it appropriate to say that while macro-economic stability of a country is the precondition for economic growth, the latter may not necessarily be indicative of the former? The trade-off between the two is not simple enough.
Macroeconomic stability can be defined and measured in different dimensions including real, nominal and external stability. To speak of the most important one, real stability is related to sustained and stable growth in economic activity and employment, and is measured by business cycle indicators, such as the unemployment rate or the output gap. Macroeconomic stability is often considered a buffer against currency and interest fluctuations in the global market. Exposure to currency fluctuations, large debt burdens, and unmanaged inflation can cause economic crises and a collapse of GDP. It is here that macro-economic stability features as the foundation of an economy. Economists consider five variables to measure macro-economic stability. These include low and stable inflation, low long-term interest rates, low national debt relative to GDP, low deficits, and currency stability.
To read the rest of the news, please click on the link above.
































