[🇧🇩] NYPD Kills Bangladeshi Teen Win Rozario After He Calls 911 for Help, as His Mom Pleads for His Life

[Lulldapull]

What is more important than Nation is cultural identity and feeling of oneness. Though, Nepal and India are different nation today, people still have Roti Beti relation. Incase, Nepal merges with India, there won't be much issues. They can assimilate easily with India. This is the reason why 6 million Nepalis earn their livelihood in India without any viza and have merged with local population without much problem. I see more similarities between rural Gujarat people and rural Pakistani people of some area of Sindh than between Kerelites. India is nation not because different people came to gather, formed a union and unanimously decided to form a nation with federal structure. In Kashi Vishwanath, priest is always from South India. Kashivishwanath Darshan is incomplete without the darshan of Pashupatinath. This cultural bonding is much stronger than L**d identity of nation. Look at Pakistan. Baloch do not consider them Pakistanis, nor Pashtuns. A nation without shared value and shared culture is a L**d nation like Pakistan while people feel one though they are from different nation. Example, Nepali and Indian Hindus, Pakistani and Irani Baloch, Pakistani and Afghani Pashtuns.

Iraanddz a nation Krishna......2500 saal ho gaey bhai......Aaaj US k saamnay kharra hae refusing to surrender. Aaap kar saktay ho what Iraaandzz is doing?
No right, cuz the Zio's already own you. Yous can't do it bhai cuz yous ain't a nation. Just like baqisstaanndd no?

 

[Vsdoc]

What is more important than Nation is cultural identity and feeling of oneness. Though, Nepal and India are different nation today, people still have Roti Beti relation. Incase, Nepal merges with India, there won't be much issues. They can assimilate easily with India. This is the reason why 6 million Nepalis earn their livelihood in India without any viza and have merged with local population without much problem. I see more similarities between rural Gujarat people and rural Pakistani people of some area of Sindh than between Kerelites. India is nation not because different people came to gather, formed a union and unanimously decided to form a nation with federal structure. In Kashi Vishwanath, priest is always from South India. Kashivishwanath Darshan is incomplete without the darshan of Pashupatinath. This cultural bonding is much stronger than L**d identity of nation. Look at Pakistan. Baloch do not consider them Pakistanis, nor Pashtuns. A nation without shared value and shared culture is a L**d nation like Pakistan while people feel one though they are from different nation. Example, Nepali and Indian Hindus, Pakistani and Irani Baloch, Pakistani and Afghani Pashtuns.

Thank you for changing goalpost.

So we agree.

India was never a nation.

Forget 5000 years.

 

[Vsdoc]

All these kings had Marriage relation amongst themselves. Gujart Kings had Rajasthani Queen, Mysore king's wife was from Kathiyawad (Saurashtra Region of Gujarat). Ramji's wife Mata sita was from Nepal. All were relatives. Because of vast geographical area and diverse culture, there were many kingdom.
Kingdom of Chandragupta had many areas under his reign beyond today's India. His kingdom fulfills most of the criterion you noted. So as the case with Samudragupta and Lalitaditya Muktapid who rulled many parts of Today's China and Russia.
Race, Ethnicity and Language is a L**D European concept for a nation. India with over 28 languages and over 700 dialects is a much united nation than 26 Arab nations with same language, ethnicity and race.

Crap or not is your opinion.

All I have gotten you to agree is that India was never a nation.

I am satisfied with that.

Because that was my original position.

Let's move on.

 

[Vsdoc]

Sharma would eventually come around to da right side doc......hes just like a child. We're talking to him.....he's getting it slowly......but I have hope that he'd eventually turn and realize that all dis nonsense is just.....nonsense. Khud colluddz hae, so he's already half way there already. Eventually he'd understand dat sucking off the Zio's is pointless. I mean as an Indian colluddzz fella he should know better.

Your last sentence is the crux no?

Its not just Indian. Or colored. I am Indian and colored. You are Pakistani and colored.

You are being kind. Say it like it is. Its being Hindu.

Jews look down on Hindus worse than Christians or Muslims do. Especially their ultra orthodox crowd.

They look at Hindus as sub human animists and polytheists.

Now for a Hindu to suck their cock 24/7 is just about enough to push me over the edge man.

I cannot respect such extreme lack of self respect.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

Thank you for changing goalpost.

So we agree.

India was never a nation.

Forget 5000 years.

I Haven't and I do not change goal post ever like you did in the argument of Mahabharat. I explained you why shared values/Culture is more important than physical boundaries of nation which keeps changing. You are not willing to understand inspite of providing numerous examples. You are Donald trump of this Forum.

 

[Vsdoc]

I Haven't and I do not change goal post ever like you did in the argument of Mahabharat. I explained you why shared values is more important than physical boundaries of nation which keeps changing. You are not willing to understand inspite of providing numerous examples. You are Donald trump of this Forum.

You changed the goalpost.

First you claimed India was a nation for 5000 years.

Now you say being a nation is not really important.

You are most likely to succeed in politics from this forum.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

You changed the goalpost.

First you claimed India was a nation for 5000 years.

Now you say being a nation is not really important.

You are most likely to succeed in politics from this forum.

I gave you numerous example starting Mahabharat and visnu puran. I gave you example of foreign scholars who wrote about India and not about Kalinga or Takshshila or Hastinapur, Vaishali, Gurjar Desh etc. Today's India was known in China as Tianzau. Had there been no identity as a nation, why all of them used a single word for all these kingdoms together rather than naming them separately. Why inspite of being a formal nation, people of many nations do not want to consider themselves the national of that nation. You are unwilling understand anything out of this. You have a special privilege to discard anything calling it a Sanghi Propaganda.

 

[Afhan]

US police department is the worst human rights violator. Their human rights violation against black Americans and other ethnic/religious minorities is wide spread. But the shameless US Govt. always lectures us about our human rights condition.

When has India ever been a nation for even 500 years (actually not even 100), leave alone 5000?

Poetic license?

Dsskh

rf

I gave you numerous example starting Mahabharat and visnu puran. I gave you example of foreign scholars who wrote about India and not about Kalinga or Takshshila or Hastinapur, Vaishali, Gurjar Desh etc. Today's India was known in China as Tianzau. Had there been no identity as a nation, why all of them used a single word for all these kingdoms together rather than naming them separately. Why inspite of being a formal nation, people of many nations do not want to consider themselves the national of that nation. You are unwilling understand anything out of this. You have a special privilege to discard anything calling it a Sanghi Propaganda.

This is a valid point @Vsdoc