New Tweets

[🇵🇰] The Great Game: The Soviet KGB And Pakistan

G Pakistan Affairs
[🇵🇰] The Great Game: The Soviet KGB And Pakistan
40
2K
More threads by Old School

Old School

Senior Moderator
Moderator
1,774
1,020
Origin

Axis Group

[H1]The great game: The KGB and Pakistan[/H1]
THIS country cannot last. This was the conclusion of Joseph Stalin as the Soviet Politburo examined the map of the two winged Pakistan that emerged from the Partition of the subcontinent in August 1947.
The Kremlin's "special relationship" on the subcontinent was with India, not Pakistan. Mrs Gandhi could not have won the Bangladesh war without New Delhi's Friendship Treaty with the USSR. December 1971 was a Cold War proxy battlefield in the rice paddy fields of East Bengal.

A quarter century later, General Secretary Brezhnev and KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov, the Russian spymaster who literally changed the map of the world, vindicated Stalin's prophecy. Most students of Pakistani politics are obsessed by the symbiotic relationship between the CIA, the Pentagon, the White House and the successive military dictatorships that have ruled Pakistan. My interest lies in the other great game played in the shadow world from Moscow Centre by the Soviet KGB, arguably the most ruthless and powerful secret intelligence agency on the planet at the time.
You still meet them in Moscow, St Petersburg, London, Geneva and Istanbul. Fluent Urdu or Pashto/Dari speakers, elegant Russians in their fifties now, men and women who once worked for various KGB residents in Kabul, Rawalpindi, Lahore and Karachi. The intelligence caches provided by KGB archivist Vasili Mitrokhin to an enigmatic English don at Corpus Christi College, deep in the Cambridge fens, exposed the KGB's systematic infiltration of Pakistan's GHQ and diplomatic corps, confirmed that Chairman Andropov and his agents of the KGB First Chief Directorate waged a secret war against my country from the moment of its creation.
This was the secret world's Great Game of the1980's, was the modern equivalent of the struggle between the late Victorian British Raj and the Romanov empire, fought in Afghanistan for the sake of the jewel in the crown. I had no idea at the time but, as a teenager in London, I attended several "Save Bhutto" campaign rallies for the first elected prime minister of Pakistan then awaiting the hangman's noose in Rawalpindi. I saw Mir Murtaza and Shahnawaz, the sons of Bhutto.
A seventeen year old knows nothing about the cynical calculations of intelligence agencies or the surreal logic of the Cold War. I was simply motivated by outrage that a military dictator named Zia had usurped the power that the people of Pakistan had bestowed on ZA Bhutto, my boyhood hero for whom I had sworn to dedicate my life as a diplomat, to learn French, Spanish German, Russian and Arabic in a lifelong quest that still continues. But on April 4th 1979, when Zia hanged Bhutto, something died in me. I vowed never to work for any government of Pakistan ruled by a military dictator and I never did.
The Kremlin's "special relationship" on the subcontinent was with India, not Pakistan. Mrs Gandhi could not have won the Bangladesh war without New Delhi's Friendship Treaty with the USSR. December 1971 was a Cold War proxy battlefield in the rice paddy fields of East Bengal. Andropov distrusted ZA Bhutto, thought him a Chinese agent of influence ever since he joined Ayub Khan's Cabinet as foreign minister in 1964, was disgusted by the idea of a Berkeley–Oxford educated Sindhi feudal landowner donning a Mao cap and waving his little Green Book. Bhutto visited Moscow twice but neither Brezhnev, Podgornyn or Gromyko reciprocated with a state visit to Islamabad. The Kremlin distrusted Bhutto's new friends and patrons in the Islamic world – the Pahlavi Shah of Iran, Saudi King Faisal, Colonel Gaddafi, the Gulf oil shaikhs. They were right. Mr Bhutto was no Marxist Leninist ideologue but a student of Machiavelli, Napoleon and Sun Tzu. He had no permanent friends, no permanent enemies, only permanent interests. His cynicism cost him his life.
 
As young teenagers growing up in Karachi in the 1980's, the first time this Afghani war smacked me in the face was when we drove by the Regal area in Saddar, a day later in the aftermath of the car bomb which the Afghani KHAD intelligence carried out. That was the first time it occurred to me that we were at war with the Soviets. Dozens of shops were totally destroyed guys. A 100 odd people were killed and wounded, just bystanders. It was a horrible scene. There was a huge crater where the car bomb went off. I'll never forget that.
 
The first and most serious harm the Soviets did was to use various proxies to dismember our country in 1971. I find it outrageous how many naive Pakistanis remain so indifferent to the event of 1971 as if nothing happened. Let their neighbor take over half of their property and see how they feel about it. That is ignorance without limits. They do not realize how demoralizing and strategic loss it is for a country to lose half of its territory. The victory in 1971 massively encouraged the Soviets to go ahead with their Afghan adventure in 1979. If there had been no 1971, there would have never been a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and today's mess.
 
The first and most serious harm the Soviets did was to use various proxies to dismember our country in 1971. I find it outrageous how many naive Pakistanis remain so indifferent to the event of 1971 as if nothing happened. Let their neighbor take over half of their property and see how they feel about it. That is ignorance without limits. They do not realize how demoralizing and strategic loss it is for a country to lose half of its territory. The victory in 1971 massively encouraged the Soviets to go ahead with their Afghan adventure in 1979. If there had been no 1971, there would have never been a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and today's mess.
I wouldn't call losing East Pakistan as losing half of the country atleast in land area. Bangladesh is only slightly larger than Sindh province.
 
I wouldn't call losing East Pakistan as losing half of the country atleast in land area. Bangladesh is only slightly larger than Sindh province.
But it was the entire eastern wing. That is half in the strategic sense, not to mention more than half of the population and other strategic resources, plus access to the strategic Bay of Bengal. People in Punjab fight over two-inch land with their neighbors, and we are talking about 55,000 sq miles. The mass decline of education has blinded our people.
 
But it was the entire eastern wing. That is half in the strategic sense, not to mention more than half of the population and other strategic resources, plus access to the strategic Bay of Bengal. People in Punjab fight over two-inch land with their neighbors, and we are talking about 55,000 sq miles. The mass decline of education has blinded our people.
Yes back then, East Pakistan had a larger population than West Pakistan. Precisely why Mujib should have been PM.

By the way my old uncle who is now in his 70s, says people back then used to hate USSR the same way people nowadays hate USA. lol.
 
Yes back then, East Pakistan had a larger population than West Pakistan. Precisely why Mujib should have been PM.

By the way my old uncle who is now in his 70s, says people back then used to hate USSR the same way people nowadays hate USA. lol.
The USSR created many long-lasting problems, which we still face today. However, today's Russia is not the same, as it does not carry the USSR ideology. Today's Russia accepts its past mistakes, and it can be our good strategic partner.
 

Members Online

No members online now.

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle Create