Home Watch Videos Wars

[🇧🇩] The International Crimes Tribunal-1----Charging Hasina and her accomplices

[🇧🇩] The International Crimes Tribunal-1----Charging Hasina and her accomplices
28
840
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

Tulip calls Bangladesh plot corruption verdict ‘predictable’, ‘farcical’

bdnews24.com
Published :
Dec 01, 2025 22:20
Updated :
Dec 01, 2025 22:20

1764637526056.webp

Sir Keir Starmer with a grinning Tulip Siddiq after Labour’s general election victory. Photo via The Telegraph

British MP Tulip Siddiq has rejected her sentence in Bangladesh on corruption charges, branding the verdict “flawed and farcical” and “as predictable as it is unjustified.”

Speaking to the press, Tulip alleged that Bangladeshi authorities attempted to discredit her using “fake” identity documents, a claim she reiterated after The Telegraph reported documents purporting to show her holding a Bangladeshi passport -- an assertion she denies.

The 43-year-old Hampstead & Highgate representative, who resigned from her UK ministerial role in January amid scrutiny over her family’s political ties, was sentenced in absentia to two years in prison on Monday over allegations that she manipulated her aunt, former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, to secure state land for her immediate family.

According to The Telegraph, The 43-year-old Hampstead & Highgate representative rejects the allegations outright, calling the proceedings “politically” driven and fundamentally “flawed”.

ALLEGATIONS AND VERDICT

A special court in Dhaka on Monday found Tulip guilty of “manipulating and influencing” her aunt, former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, to secure government plots for members of her immediate family.

Prosecutors said Tulip used her influence to persuade Hasina to arrange land allocations for Tulip’s mother Sheikh Rehana and her two siblings.

Mir Ahmed Ali Salam, of the prosecution, told The Times that a key witness against Tulip was Osman Goni, personal officer to Hasina’s former principal secretary. Osman testified that the MP had communicated through his superior regarding plot allocations.

Reuters reported that the plots -- part of a new township project, Purbachal New Town, intended to ease population pressures in Dhaka -- were unlawfully allocated through political influence and collusion with senior officials. Fourteen other defendants received five-year jail terms for their roles.

Tulip, Hasina and Rehana were each fined Tk 100,000, with another six months’ imprisonment if unpaid.

HASINA ALSO SENTENCED IN MULTIPLE CASES

The verdict comes amid a series of cases brought by the interim government against Hasina, who was ousted in Aug 2024 after weeks of student-led protests.

The Times reported that in the same corruption case Hasina and Rehana were sentenced to five and seven years respectively.

Last month, Hasina was also sentenced to death by the International Crimes Tribunal for ordering lethal crackdowns on protests -- charges she denies. She has been living in India since fleeing the country during the July Uprising.

CONCERNS OVER FAIR TRIAL

UK political figures and legal experts voiced deep alarm over the fairness of the process.

As reported by The Times, senior British lawyers -- including former attorney-general Dominic Grieve KC, former justice secretary Sir Robert Buckland KC, and Cherie Blair KC -- wrote to the Bangladeshi High Commission criticising what they described as a contrived and unjust procedure.

They said Tulip had not been informed of the charges, lacked access to legal representation, and that a lawyer appointed for her in Bangladesh had been pressured and placed under house arrest.

Both The Telegraph and Reuters reported that the UK Labour Party stated it “cannot recognise this judgment” due to Tulip’s lack of due process.

LABOUR TIES

Tulip’s political ties with Keir Starmer began in 2014, when she had already secured the Labour nomination for Hampstead and Kilburn and offered her support for his candidacy in the neighbouring seat of Holborn and St Pancras.

The duo entered Westminster on the same night in the 2015 general election.

Although they backed different contenders in that year’s leadership race, both were later brought onto Jeremy Corbyn’s front bench.

When Labour sought a new leader again in early 2020, Tulip was among the earliest MPs to publicly endorse Starmer, reported The Telegraph.

The Telegraph said she welcomed his eventual win, telling the Camden New Journal that he had remained “a good friend through thick and thin”.

Beyond their parliamentary roles, Tulip is widely regarded as one of the few MPs Starmer considers a personal friend rather than only a colleague, the British daily added.

He said so himself in 2018 while campaigning with her ahead of the local elections, praising his “good friend and colleague”.

Both families are also said to have spent time together privately, with The Telegraph suggesting joint family holidays.

EXTRADITION UNLIKELY

Britain and Bangladesh do not have an extradition treaty, making it improbable that the former UK government minister will serve the sentence unless she voluntarily returns to Bangladesh.

The Times noted that extradition remains theoretically possible through a direct appeal to the UK home secretary.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Probe report in July crimes against humanity case against Joy, others received

BSS
Published :
Dec 03, 2025 20:12
Updated :
Dec 03, 2025 20:12

1764810388660.webp


The prosecution of the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) has received the probe report in a case filed over crimes against humanity committed during the July Mass Uprising against Sajeeb Wazed Joy and three others.

"We have received the probe report over July Mass Uprising crimes against humanity against Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Zunaid Ahmed Palak, Salman F Rahman and Anisul Huq," prosecutor Gazi MH Tamim told newsmen.

Although the prosecutor declined to provide details, various media outlets have reported that Joy, former ICT affairs adviser to ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, and Palak have been accused of shutting down internet services nationwide during the uprising, thereby abetting the commission of crimes against humanity.

Anisul Huq and Salman F Rahman, meanwhile, have reportedly been accused of inciting mass killings and other crimes against humanity by imposing curfew at the time.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

‘Mind your language’: Panna and Tajul exchange words in ICT-1 courtroom
Court says Panna, appointed as Hasina’s defence counsel, can't withdraw without permission

1764812167115.webp


The International Crimes Tribunal-1 today directed two deputy registrars to rush to the chamber of senior Supreme Court lawyer ZI Khan Panna -- earlier appointed by the court as defence counsel for Sheikh Hasina in an enforced disappearance case -- after he failed to appear at the hearing on charge framing.

The tribunal, visibly displeased, first halted proceedings and then ordered two deputy registrars to physically go to Panna's chamber and direct him to appear "immediately".

The hearing began with Chief Prosecutor Tajul Islam opening his submission on charge framing against 17 people, including Sheikh Hasina. However, Tribunal Chair Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder abruptly stopped him, asking, "Has the defence lawyer withdrawn?"

Tribunal member Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood asked, "Why is he not present today?"

Tajul informed the bench that Panna had written to the registrar expressing his withdrawal from the case. Justice Shofiul replied that such withdrawal required personal appearance: "He has to appear and explain."

The tribunal chair added, "Earlier, he was so interested, but now he is not. Just writing a letter to the registrar is not enough."

Tajul then noted that Panna had recently made "contemptuous" comments on social media.

The bench officer was asked to produce Panna's letter, which the chair read before remarking, "Does he not know the rules? He himself appeared and sought to be the defence lawyer for the No. 1 accused, and we accepted it."

Justice Mortuza ordered two deputy registrars to visit Panna's chamber and inform him, "The tribunal wants your presence right now."

Panna eventually arrived in a wheelchair. As he entered, Justice Mortuza reminded him, "You showed interest in defending Sheikh Hasina, and we appointed you."

"No," Panna replied. "The tribunal ordered orally, and I accepted orally."

Panna said he should have come in person to inform the court, but he was unwell.

The tribunal observed that the charge hearing was proceeding in his absence and would have to be re-heard once a new defence counsel was appointed. "You could have sent a representative," the chair said.

"I am unwell. I wanted to inform the court by appearing physically," Panna repeated.

Referring to a video the bench had received, Justice Shofiul said, "In the video, you were heard saying: 'My client, my leader does not accept this [tribunal's] judgement, then how could I go?' If your client has no faith, then why did you come? In the previous case against Sheikh Hasina, you came when the trial began."

Panna said he felt "sandwiched" between pressure from both his client and the opposing side. Smiling, the chair responded, "At this rate, you're going to have a heart attack from all the pressure."

Justice Mortuza continued, "We issued notices, but no one came. It's not written on anyone's forehead who is a good lawyer, so we appointed a senior one. Then you appeared midway and expressed interest, but by then we could not appoint you. We did not expect this kind of behaviour from you."

"I offer an unconditional apology," Panna replied.

The bench then pointed to lawyer Md Amir Hossain, present in the courtroom, saying they intended to appoint him as defence counsel and sought his consent. Amir, previously appointed as state defence counsel for Hasina and former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal in another crimes against humanity case, replied he would do as the tribunal directed.

The tribunal also asked other senior lawyers present whether they were interested.

At this point, Chief Prosecutor Tajul told the bench that Panna's comment -- "my client does not accept the trial" -- was contemptuous.

Justice Shofiul replied, "We have learned many things from you. We consider you an idol… You played an important role during the student-led July movement."

He then asked Panna, "Are we to assume you are in contact with her [Sheikh Hasina]? You cannot say, 'My client does not accept the tribunal, so I cannot appear.'"

Justice Mortuza again reminded him, "You know that once appointed, you cannot withdraw without the tribunal's permission. You may criticise a judge or a judgement, but you cannot defy the tribunal. The Constitution itself grants this tribunal an upper hand."

When Panna argued that his client insisted on the Constitution of 1972, the tribunal responded, "The Constitution is there. No other constitution was formulated in 1990 or at any other time."

As Tajul rose again to speak, Panna questioned why he was "jumping up." Tajul shot back, "Mind your language." The chair intervened, instructing Tajul to sit.

At one point, the tribunal chair remarked to Panna, "You are not in good health."

Tajul again referred to Panna's social media remarks. The chair responded, "We are overlooking what you have said, but do not make such comments in the future. People listen to the words of senior lawyers like you."​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

ICT orders arrest of Joy
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha . Dhaka 04 December, 2025

1764899650242.webp

Sajeeb Wazed Joy | BSS photo

The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT)-1 on Thursday issued an arrest warrant against Sajeeb Wazed Joy, former ICT affairs adviser and son of ousted Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina, in a case lodged over crimes against humanity committed during the July Mass Uprising.

The three-member tribunal, headed by Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder, passed the order after taking cognisance of the formal charge brought against Joy and former state minister for ICT Division Zunaid Ahmed Palak.

The tribunal fixed December 10 for passing further orders in the case.

According to the formal charge, Joy and Palak are accused of shutting down nationwide internet services during the July uprising, allegedly facilitating the commission of crimes against humanity.

‘Palak, being the state minister for the ICT Division at the time, gave a status and made a post on his verified Facebook account after getting approval from Sheikh Hasina’s ICT affairs adviser Sajeeb Wazed Joy, hence instigating an unprecedented attack on the agitating students and people by police and Chhatra League cadres,’ the prosecution said.

Chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam said Palak, following the order and approval from Joy, first reduced the speed of mobile internet and subsequently shut it down to create an opportunity to detain, torture and kill the protesters.

‘He then gave a false statement regarding the shutdown of the internet and later blocked a couple of social networking sites like WhatsApp, Facebook and TikTok to keep the whole world in the dark regarding the horrific crimes that were taking place at the time.

‘The conspiracy to block the internet came from Sajeeb Wazed Joy. He made the decision after taking advice from his mother, Sheikh Hasina, and his decision was executed by Palak,’ the prosecution added.

The investigation agency of the tribunal on December 3 submitted the probe report against the accused.

‘We have received the probe report on the July Mass Uprising crimes against humanity against Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Zunaid Ahmed Palak, Salman F Rahman and Anisul Huq,’ prosecutor Gazi MH Tamim told newsmen last evening.

Sources said Anisul Huq and Salman F Rahman have also been accused of inciting mass killings and other crimes against humanity by imposing curfew at the time.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

ICT orders notice in newspapers to summon Sajeeb Wazed Joy

UNB
Published :
Dec 10, 2025 21:47
Updated :
Dec 10, 2025 21:47

1765415427539.webp


The International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) on Wednesday ordered the publication of a notice in two national dailies to summon Sajeeb Wazed Joy, son of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, in a case related to crimes against humanity during the July-August uprising in 2024.

A two-member judicial panel led by Chairman Justice Md. Golam Mortuza Majumder with Justice Md. Shafiul Alam Mahmud, issued the directive after hearing from Chief Prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam, who informed the tribunal that Joy, against whom an arrest warrant had been issued, was absconding.

The tribunal granted the prosecution’s application to publish the notice and fixed December 17 for the next hearing.

The other accused in the case, former ICT State Minister Zunaid Ahmed Palak, is in custody and was produced before the tribunal on Wednesday.

Lawyer Liton Ahmed stood on behalf of Palak.

The charges against Joy and Palak include concealing information about killings during the mass uprising by shutting down the internet, incitement to massacre, conspiracy, and involvement in the killings.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
 
G
O
 
H
O
M
E