Home Login Watch Videos Wars

[🇧🇩] The International Crimes Tribunal-1----Charging Hasina and her accomplices

[🇧🇩] The International Crimes Tribunal-1----Charging Hasina and her accomplices
28
718
More threads by Saif

G Bangladesh Defense

ICT begins trial of Hasina, Kamal, 11 army officers
M Moneruzzaman 22 January, 2026, 00:27

1769046017996.webp

Sheikh Hasina.

The International Crimes Tribunal-1 on Wednesday began the trial over enforced disappearances against deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, former defence adviser retired major general Tarique Ahmed Siddique, three former directors general of the Rapid Action Battalion, and 11 RAB directors deputed from the army.

The three-member tribunal, headed by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, opened the trial by recording the testimony of Supreme Court lawyer and enforced disappearance victim Mir Ahmad Bin Quasem Arman.

The trial of the 17 accused in this enforced disappearance case began two days after the same tribunal on Monday opened the trial of another enforced disappearance case against 13 people, including Hasina, Tarique, and 11 other serving and retired army officials deputed to the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence.

Arman, who testified as the first prosecution witness in the case on Wednesday, is the son of executed war crimes convict Mir Quasem Ali and is one of the 11 victims who returned from a secret detention centre run by RAB-1 Taskforce cell at its headquarters in Dhaka after their enforced disappearance.

Arman told the tribunal that he was confined for eight years at a secret detention centre run by RAB-1’s Taskforce cell during the ousted Awami League regime.

His testimony began after chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam had placed his opening statement before the tribunal.

Tajul said that enforced disappearances of political dissenters were used as a tool by the Awami League to remain in power for long.

The tribunal set January 26 to complete Arman’s testimony and cross-examination.

The same date was also fixed for hearing review petitions filed by detained army officers challenging the tribunal’s December 23 order that rejected their discharge petitions.

The 10 accused army officers, who were then deputed in the RAB-1, are now detained and were present in the dock.

Seven other accused, including Hasina, Asaduzzaman, Tarique, a retired army officer and three former senior police officers, are still in hiding and facing the trial in absentia.

The detained army officers are Colonel KM Azad, Colonel Abdullah Al Momen, Brigadier General Md Mahbub Alam, Lieutenant Colonel Anwar Latif Khan, Brigadier General Md Jahangir Alam, Lieutenant Colonel Sarwar Bin Kashem, Lieutenant Colonel Saiful Islam Suman, Brigadier General Tofayel Mostafa Sarwar, Brigadier General Kamrul Hassan and Lieutenant Colonel Moshiur Rahman Jewel.

Besides Hasina, Kamal and Tarique, the other absconding accused are retired lieutenant colonel Muhammad Khairul Islam, a former RAB intelligence chief now believed to be living in the United Kingdom, and three former police officers - Benazir Ahmed, a former inspector general of police, Khurshid Hossain and barrister Harun-or-Rashid, all former RAB director generals during the Awami League regime.

Arman, in his testimony, said that he was picked up from his rented home in the capital’s DOHS area on the night of August 9, 2016, by seven or eight armed men who identified themselves as members of RAB-1.

He said that the men were wearing bulletproof vests marked ‘RAB-1’.

At the time, the Appellate Division was hearing his father’s review petition against the death sentence for war crimes.

Arman testified that when senior officials visited him, he was handcuffed behind his back and made to stand facing a wall so that he could not recognise the officers.

He said that he heard some visitors speaking in Hindi and talking on mobile phones, and noticed the smell of perfume.

He said he spent eight Ramadans during his confinement for eight years. He added that he wanted a copy of the Quran but was denied.

According to him, a guard once said that they could not provide it because a foreign intelligence officer of RAW had been staying there.

Arman testified that he was taken to a secret detention centre after his abduction and kept in a small cell on the first floor for 16 days while blindfolded and handcuffed. Later, he was shifted to another cell.

He said that only one of his hands was free for eating and using the toilet.

He said that he later identified the building after visiting the site with the chief adviser, members of the enforced disappearance commission, the ICT chief prosecutor, and investigators following the change of government on August 5, 2024.

Arman told the tribunal that he fell sick several times and underwent surgery for thigh swelling inside the detention facility.

He said he saw a wooden box marked ‘TFI’ and was once given an ointment tube labelled ‘Property of RAB HQ’.

During winter, he said that he was given a blanket marked ‘RAB’ or ‘INT’. From his cell, he said, he could hear aircraft landing, training activities, and the movement of vehicles.

Arman said that he was always blindfolded with military-style fabric. One night, the blindfold was changed to a gamcha, and his hands were tied with cloth.

He said that he was later put into a microbus, forced to lie on the floor, and someone sat on his body during the drive. After about 30 minutes, he was released.

Arman said that he walked after being dropped off, heard the call to prayer, offered prayers, and then realised that he was in the Diabari area of Uttara.

On Monday, the same tribunal started enforced disappearance trial of Hasina, Tarique Ahmed Siddique, and 11 other serving and retired army officials, who were deputed in the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence during the Awami League regime, for their alleged involvement in committing crimes against humanity, including abduction, detention and torture of 26 people with dissenting views against the Awami League at the DGFI’s secret detention Cells.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

ICT-1 orders start of trial against Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Junaid Ahmed Palak
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha . Dhaka 21 January, 2026, 16:47

1769046339939.webp

Zunaid Ahmed Palak and Sajeeb Wazed Joy. | UNB file photo

International Crimes Tribunal-1 on Wednesday framed charges against Sajeeb Wazed Joy, son of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina and former ICT affairs adviser, and former state minister for the ICT division Zunaid Ahmed Palak for allegedly facilitating crimes against humanity by imposing a nationwide internet shutdown.

The three-member tribunal, headed by Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder, framed three charges of crimes against humanity against the duo and fixed February 18 for submission of the prosecution’s opening statement and commencement of witness depositions.

On January 15, the tribunal had set on Wednesday for passing its order after both the prosecution and defence concluded their hearings.

Chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam appeared for the prosecution, while Litonne Ahmed represented accused Zunaid Ahmed Palak and Manjur Alam defended fugitive accused Sajeeb Wazed Joy.

On December 4, the tribunal issued an arrest warrant against Joy after taking cognisance of the formal charges brought against him and Palak.

According to the formal charge, the accused are alleged to have shut down internet services across the country during the July uprising, thereby facilitating the commission of crimes against humanity.

The prosecution said Palak, while serving as state minister for the ICT division, posted a status on his verified Facebook account after receiving approval from Joy, which allegedly instigated widespread attacks on agitating students and the public by police and Chhatra League cadres.

Tajul Islam told the tribunal that, following Joy’s instructions, Palak first reduced mobile internet speed and later imposed a complete shutdown to create an environment conducive to the detention, torture and killing of protesters.

He further said Palak provided misleading statements regarding the internet disruption and later blocked social media platforms including WhatsApp, Facebook and TikTok to prevent information about the alleged atrocities from reaching the outside world.

‘The conspiracy to block the internet originated from Sajeeb Wazed Joy. He made the decision after consulting his mother, Sheikh Hasina, and Palak implemented it,’ the prosecution added.

The tribunal’s investigation agency submitted its probe report against the accused on December 3, 2025.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

ICT sentences ex-DMP boss Habib, 2 others to death over Chankharpul killings

Ex-AC Imrul, four other cops jailed for 3 to 6 years

M Moneruzzaman 26 January, 2026, 12:41

1769477393322.webp

Habibur Rahman

The International Crimes Tribunal-1 on Monday sentenced three senior officers of Dhaka Metropolitan Police to death and five of their subordinate officers to varying prison terms for their roles in the killings in the capital’s Chankharpool area during the 2024 student-led mass uprising.

The death sentence recipients are Dhaka Metropolitan Police’s former commissioner Habibur Rahman, former joint commissioner Sudip Kumar Chakraborty, and former Ramna assistant deputy commissioner Shah Alam Md Akhterul Islam.

The tribunal found them guilty of crimes against humanity for their superior command responsibility in the Chankharpool operation, which left six protesters dead and several others injured.

The tribunal also ordered the confiscation of their properties to the state exchequer. All three convicts remain absconding.

Five other police officers were sentenced to three to six years’ imprisonment for their complicity in the killings.

They are former Ramna assistant commissioner Mohammad Imrul, Shahbagh police station inspector (operations) Arshad Hossain, and suspended constables Sujan Hossain, Imaz Hossain Imon, and Nasirul Islam.

AC Imrul was sentenced to six years, Arshad to four years and constables Sujan, Imaz and Nasir to three years.

Of the five, all but Imrul were present in the dock, as they are currently in custody.

A three-member tribunal, headed by Justice Md Golam Mortuza Mozumder, delivered the verdict. The other members are Justice Md Shofiul Alam Mahmood and retired district and sessions judge Mohammad Mohitul Haque Anam Chowdhury.

The detained convicts remained calm in the dock during the pronouncement of the verdict.

Their female family members, on hearing the verdict, however, broke down in tears inside the courtroom.

After the announcement of the verdict, chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam told the tribunal that the prosecution would appeal against lighter sentences against five ex-police officers.

Parents of several victims also expressed dissatisfaction with the lighter sentences given to the subordinate officers.

According to the prosecution, the convicted constables opened fire on protesters on August 5, 2024, killing six people.

According to the charges, the former metropolitan police chief and his officers allegedly ordered, abetted, and facilitated the killings while the constables carried out the shootings that left six people dead during a protest on August 5, 2024.

The six victims killed at Chankharpool are Shahriar Khan Anas, a class-10 student who left behind a poignant letter to his mother, Sheikh Mahadi Hasan Zunayed, also known as Mostakin, Mohammad Yakib, Md Rakib Hawlader, Mohammad Ismail Haque, and Manik Mia, who is also known as Saharik Chowdhury.

Anas, the very young student, left his Gandaria home that morning after writing, ‘I cannot stay at home while people from all walks of life have joined the July uprising,’ according to the tribunal investigator.

The tribunal held DMP commissioner Habibur and his colleagues, Sudip and Akhterul, responsible for the killings due to their superior command responsibility.

It observed that the subordinate officers were found liable to the extent of their complicity, but not as principal offenders.

The tribunal noted that it was not possible to determine which specific bullets killed which victims, but said this was not necessary to establish crimes against humanity.

The tribunal observed that after the fall of the Awami League regime on August 5, 2024, Habibur, Sudip, Akhterul and Imrul fled, reinforcing their involvement in the crimes.

It found that Habibur ordered his subordinate officers to use maximum force with lethal weapons against the protesters.

Habibur conveyed the order through a wireless message. He, along with Sudip and Akhterul, later briefed police officers at Shahbagh police station.

The tribunal found that ADC Akhterul also separately briefed police members deployed at Chankharpool.

As protesters were marching towards Central Shaheed Minar to join the March to Dhaka programme, constables Sujan Hossain, Imaz Hossain Imon and Nasirul Islam opened fire with lethal weapons, killing six protesters and injuring many others.

AC Imrul was present at the scene, and the forces involved were operating under his command, the tribunal found.

The tribunal found that ADC Akhterul compelled subordinate officers to fire, acting on the instructions of the DMP commissioner. Some officers refused to shoot, despite pressure.

It observed that 40 to 50 police and law enforcement personnel were deployed in the Chankharpool area.

It said that mere presence at the site was not a crime, as maintaining law and order was their duty.

The tribunal noted that constable Sujan, who had joined the police only months earlier, was not in a position to refuse orders from his superiors.

Sujan was seen rejoicing and cheering when his bullets hit protesters, the tribunal observed.

It found that ADC Akhterul forcibly handed a China rifle and bullets to Sujan, taking the weapon from constable Ajoy Ghose.

When some officers refused to fire, Akhterul threatened and verbally abused them, it said.

Records showed that Nasirul Islam officially returned his rifle and bullets. However, video footage showed him opening fire, leading the tribunal to conclude that he may have been forced to use another weapon during the operation.

At least 40 police members were issued 18 China rifles, 15 shotguns and two SMGs, along with a large quantity of ammunition.

Official records showed that only four to five officers returned their weapons and bullets, while the use of ammunition far exceeded what was accounted for.

The tribunal observed that the scale of firing was extensive, indicating widespread use of lethal force.

Referring to Article 7(2) of the Rome Statute, the tribunal said crimes against humanity require an attack against civilians that is widespread and systematic.

The tribunal found that during the July–August protests, law enforcers and Awami League activists were deployed nationwide to suppress protests using lethal force. It cited the use of drones and helicopters, internet shutdowns, obstruction of ambulances, denial of medical treatment, disruption of burials and threats to doctors.

It noted that a United Nations report also classified the July–August violence as crimes against humanity, specifically citing the Chankharpool killings as an example of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians.

This is the tribunal’s second verdict among at least 15 crimes against humanity cases linked to the July–August atrocities now pending before the two International Crimes Tribunals reconstituted in October 2025 under the interim government of Professor Muhammad Yunus.

In its first verdict on November 17, 2025, the tribunal sentenced deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan to death in absentia. Former inspector general of police Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun, who turned state witness, was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. They were found guilty of committing crimes against humanity for their superior command responsibility in committing widespread and systematic atrocities against July protesters across the country during the 2024 mass uprising.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

ICT orders arrest of Hasina, Kamal, 4 ex-DMP officials
Staff Correspondent 29 January, 2026, 18:05

1769737852072.webp


The International Crimes Tribunal-1 on Thursday issued arrest warrants against ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, and four former senior officials of Dhaka Metropolitan Police in a crimes against humanity case over enforced disappearances, abductions, and torture.

The case relates to the alleged detention and abuse of 10 people at secret cells of the DMP’s Counter Terrorism and Transnational Crime unit in July 2016.

The four other accused police officers are DMP’s former additional commissioner Sheikh Muhammad Maruf Hasan, former joint commissioner (crime) Abdul Baten, former joint commissioner (Detective Branch) Krishna Pada Roy, and former CTTC chief Monirul Islam.

Former inspector general of police AKM Shahidul Haque and former DMP commissioner Asaduzzaman Mia, who were arrested earlier, were produced before the three-member tribunal.

The tribunal issued warrants against the six absconding accused and directed the inspector general of police to submit an execution report by February 8.

According to the prosecution, on July 26, 2016, senior DMP police officials, along with their forces, carried out a so-called block raid at a house in Kalyanpur.

The prosecution alleged that several madrasa students and religious-minded youths were abducted and confined on the fourth floor of a building popularly known as the ‘five-storey Jhaj Building at Kalyanpur in the capital.’

The victims are Motaleb Abdullah Raihan Kabir alias Tareq, Matiur Rahman, Md Zubayer Hossain, Sejat Rouf alias Ark, Taj-ul Haque alias Rashik, Abu Hakim alias Naim, Ashiquzzaman Khan, and one unidentified man.

Investigators claimed that the victims were later portrayed as extremists and that police opened indiscriminate fire during a staged operation, killing several of them.

Rafiqul Hasan Regan, who survived with bullet injuries, was allegedly forced to file a false case describing the incident as a militant crackdown.

ICT prosecutor Gazi Monwar Hossain Tamim read out the formal charges after the investigation agency submitted the charge sheet to the ICT registrar.

He told journalists that the investigation found the youths had been arrested from different parts of the country, well before the incident.

Some were allegedly held in Detective Branch custody for two to three months before being brought to the Kalyanpur house on the night of the incident.

After the killings, the incident was publicly described as a successful anti-militant operation, the prosecution alleged.​
 
Analyze

Analyze Post

Add your ideas here:
Highlight Cite Fact Check Respond

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense
G
O
 
H
O
M
E