General Whatever

[Egyptian]

The UK and British did worse to you

What's wrong with you today, Lull? This is not like you

 

[Jiangnan]

The UK and British did worse to you

Do you know? I have always looked down upon you and the Indians. I still believe that you and the Indians can only fight with your mouths.

In 1945, China and the United States established the India.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The UK and British did worse to you

They don't know fighting for cause. The only thing they know is surrender. Now they live the life of Xi's slave.

 

[Vsdoc]

Iran has very old relations in the entire far east and Iran is respected out here. Most Iranis coming here don't want to stay here because of extreme racial diff, more than anything.

A 100k Iranis came here in 1990 and now we got only 5k max Iranis here in Japan today.

I'm just saying stating facts here doc.......Oriental mixing/ Dalit k baasturd Hendu-Paak, Camel Jaaky kaafirs, AL-Turkiyan Guppu looking Mongols?........

Iran can't mix wid nobody doc.......kya karain?

Its not even racist, its just self preservation......Islam toilet main totally janay waala hae buss 10/ 20 saal main in Iran.....

Then what?

I just had a huge discussion on dis with ten people on Zoro forum......and they all agreed k Zoro's/ Mobeds/ Dasturs not prepared for that exact moment, where they can reclaim a mighty empire......Da fukkin AL-Yahuday/ Shiit-Billay won't let go of Iran no?

Ye harami nahi chhorrain gay Iran ko......aaap kuchh bhee kar lo doc....its a serious drama bhai.

I told Sharma and Krishna about this last night.

Hobson's choice.

Should I survive like a dog.

Or die like a wolf.

 

[Vsdoc]

@Cryptonian @Krishna with Flute


You two loved talking about Pakistan grooming gangs only for Indians to top the list.

Proud moment.

Acche din.

 

[Jiangnan]

At the Tianjin summit. "Hello, dad"

 

[Vsdoc]

Hendu-pak/ colludz logon ko log kaat peet kar smashed up bottiyaan/ huddiyaan suar k saamnay daal detay hain......

Suar eats everything and then it all becomes pig shiit later. Nazi's used to burn them in dirty oil from fryers and sewers, if not in da gas ovens.

No trace!



@Sharma Ji ......dekh lay bhai.....you feel proud now?......

I did not believe this till I saw it in a movie first. Pig farm removal of evidence.

Haddi pasli chamdi baal naakhun sab chaba jaate hain. In minutes the person disappears completely. Without a trace. Ripped and chewed up whole.

I got a healthy respect for suars after that. No fukn around till they dead and on my eggs or in my sandwich.

 

[Sharma Ji]

Evictions of foreigners are fine, but your UP and Gujarati police (and BSF - acting in cahoots) are evicting mostly West Bengalis and pushing them illegally into Bangladesh.

Which means UP-ites and Biharis (and any outsider non-Bengalis in WB for that matter) will also get evicted from WB. They are already.

just kill them, no ?

please ?

 

[Bilal9]

@Bilal9 Now we know that the British killed 300 million Indians. But now we want to know. How many British soldiers were killed by Indians? In which battle did the Indian army defeat the British army?

One of the major rebellions was the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 and there were several regional uprisings, primarily in Bengal after 1857, whose leadership was educated by the British since the British ran India from Calcutta (Babus from Bengal were frequently judges, administrators and high grade civil servants appointed all across India). The British were however quite racist throughout (in addition to economically exploiting India quite mercilessly) and almost never fraternized with Indians, resulting to their eventual ouster from India.

Approximately 6,000 British individuals died during the Sepoy Mutiny, also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857. This figure includes both military personnel and civilians.

Reportedly 300,000 Mutineers also died during the Mutiny and the famine that followed.



Sepoy Mutiny of 1957

Outbreak​

On 29 March 1857, at Barrackpore (just north of Calcutta), Sepoy Mangal Pandey of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry attacked his officers. When his comrades were ordered to restrain him, they refused. But they stopped short of joining him in open revolt.

Despite only a handful of soldiers having been involved, the entire regiment was disbanded in disgrace. Many sepoys elsewhere thought this too harsh a punishment.

The Mutiny proper began at Meerut (near Delhi) on 10 May 1857. Eighty-five members of the 3rd Bengal Light Cavalry, who had been jailed for refusing to use rifle cartridges they believed to be at odds with their religion, were broken out of prison by their comrades. They ransacked the nearby military station, killing any Europeans they could find.

Trouble spreads​

The situation rapidly escalated and the British response was slow. The following day, Delhi fell to the mutineers.

News of these events spread, encouraging further mutinies elsewhere. Eventually, all 10 of the Bengal Army's light cavalry regiments and most of its 74 native infantry regiments were affected.

Some units were disarmed before they had the chance to mutiny. In other cases, British officers refused to believe their men would rebel until it was too late. Not everyone who mutinied took up arms against the British. Many simply went home and refused to assist either side.

Confined to Bengal​

At the outbreak of the rebellion, there were only 35,000 British soldiers in the entire Indian subcontinent, and these were widely scattered. Reinforcements took months to arrive.

Fortunately for the British, it was almost exclusively soldiers of the Bengal Army who mutinied. The Company’s Madras and Bombay Armies were relatively unaffected, and other Indian units - including Sikhs, Punjabi Muslims and Gurkhas - supported the British.

This was partly due to their fear of a return to Mughal rule. But they also had little in common with the high caste Hindu sepoys of the Bengal Army.

Rulers join the rising​

Discontent was also high among local rulers, who were angered by the Company’s annexation of native states. Most notorious was the 1856 deposition of the Nawab of Oudh on the grounds that he was unfit to rule.

Equally unpopular was the policy of lapse, which said that the lands of any ruler who died without a male heir would be forfeit to the Company. Princes and maharajahs, along with their courtiers and soldiers, found themselves unemployed and humiliated.

These marginalized people, seen as having the authority to lead a campaign against the British, were in many cases a natural focal point for mutineers. And although they may have preferred to deal differently with the British, the arrival of rebel sepoys at their gates often forced them to take up the cause.

Other rulers remained neutral or felt that more could be gained by supporting the British.

Religious and social revolt​

Thousands of common people joined the revolt. Some for religious reasons, others out of loyalty to their old rulers or simply to engage in looting.

Many wanted to destroy the system by which the Company collected taxes. Peasants, who had been forced to switch from subsistence farming to export crops in order to meet increasing tax demands, needed little encouragement to rebel.

​

Rebel divisions​

It was not a unified revolt. While all wanted the British gone, notions of ‘Indian-ness’ were rare. Most of the sepoys hoped to restore Mughal rule under Bahadur Shah. But the inhabitants of Oudh wanted their Nawab back, and the people of Jhansi wanted their old state restored.

The revolt was also divided on religious lines. Most sepoys were Hindus, but other rebels were Muslims fighting a holy war.

75. Maulvi Ahmad-ullah Shah

That Ahmadullah Shah was one of the central figures in the popular uprising of 1857 in Awadh becomes clear when we reconstruct his life an...

web.archive.org

More here.

Decisive events of the Indian Mutiny | National Army Museum

The 1857 rising was the biggest threat to Britain's colonial power during its rule of the Indian subcontinent.

www.nam.ac.uk

What was the British Raj?

The British Raj was the administration of India by Britain, the government having taken over that role from the East India Company after the Indian Rebellion.

www.britishempire.me.uk

 

[Bilal9]

just kill them, no ?

please ?

Surely you jest.

Killing people is not a solution even the most fascist of nationalists will advocate - which can be avenged.

Murder is an act of rank stupidity above all - and only driven/advocated by leaders with single digit IQs.

Removing people is far more humane, less controversial (and less "messy" to boot).

 

[Sharma Ji]

umm, is the sexual innuendo really high here, or am I just another horny pjeet ?

 

[Sharma Ji]

Killing people is not a solution even the most fascist of nationalists will advocate - which can be avenged.

Removing them is far more humane, less controversial (and less "messy" to boot).

Do it on the sly, don't have to go around announcing it.

 

[Sharma Ji]

niice, this one will be visible from India !

Chandra Grahan 2025: When is the lunar eclipse and where can you see it in India? - The Times of India

Trending News: India will witness the second lunar eclipse of 2025, also known as Chandra Grahan, on September 7th. The total lunar eclipse will be visible across th

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

monsoon likely to play spoilsport, certainly across the deccan.

 

[Jiangnan]

One of the major rebellions was the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 and there were several regional uprisings, primarily in Bengal after 1857, whose leadership was educated by the British since the British ran India from Calcutta (Babus from Bengal were frequently judges, administrators and high grade civil servants appointed all across India). The British were however quite racist throughout (in addition to economically exploiting India quite mercilessly) and almost never fraternized with Indians, resulting to their eventual ouster from India.

Approximately 6,000 British individuals died during the Sepoy Mutiny, also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857. This figure includes both military personnel and civilians.

Reportedly 300,000 Mutineers also died during the Mutiny and the famine that followed.



Sepoy Mutiny of 1957

Outbreak​

On 29 March 1857, at Barrackpore (just north of Calcutta), Sepoy Mangal Pandey of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry attacked his officers. When his comrades were ordered to restrain him, they refused. But they stopped short of joining him in open revolt.

Despite only a handful of soldiers having been involved, the entire regiment was disbanded in disgrace. Many sepoys elsewhere thought this too harsh a punishment.

The Mutiny proper began at Meerut (near Delhi) on 10 May 1857. Eighty-five members of the 3rd Bengal Light Cavalry, who had been jailed for refusing to use rifle cartridges they believed to be at odds with their religion, were broken out of prison by their comrades. They ransacked the nearby military station, killing any Europeans they could find.

Trouble spreads​

The situation rapidly escalated and the British response was slow. The following day, Delhi fell to the mutineers.

News of these events spread, encouraging further mutinies elsewhere. Eventually, all 10 of the Bengal Army's light cavalry regiments and most of its 74 native infantry regiments were affected.

Some units were disarmed before they had the chance to mutiny. In other cases, British officers refused to believe their men would rebel until it was too late. Not everyone who mutinied took up arms against the British. Many simply went home and refused to assist either side.

Confined to Bengal​

At the outbreak of the rebellion, there were only 35,000 British soldiers in the entire Indian subcontinent, and these were widely scattered. Reinforcements took months to arrive.

Fortunately for the British, it was almost exclusively soldiers of the Bengal Army who mutinied. The Company’s Madras and Bombay Armies were relatively unaffected, and other Indian units - including Sikhs, Punjabi Muslims and Gurkhas - supported the British.

This was partly due to their fear of a return to Mughal rule. But they also had little in common with the high caste Hindu sepoys of the Bengal Army.

Rulers join the rising​

Discontent was also high among local rulers, who were angered by the Company’s annexation of native states. Most notorious was the 1856 deposition of the Nawab of Oudh on the grounds that he was unfit to rule.

Equally unpopular was the policy of lapse, which said that the lands of any ruler who died without a male heir would be forfeit to the Company. Princes and maharajahs, along with their courtiers and soldiers, found themselves unemployed and humiliated.

These marginalised people, seen as having the authority to lead a campaign against the British, were in many cases a natural focal point for mutineers. And although they may have preferred to deal differently with the British, the arrival of rebel sepoys at their gates often forced them to take up the cause.

Other rulers remained neutral or felt that more could be gained by supporting the British.

Religious and social revolt​

Thousands of common people joined the revolt. Some for religious reasons, others out of loyalty to their old rulers or simply to engage in looting.

Many wanted to destroy the system by which the Company collected taxes. Peasants, who had been forced to switch from subsistence farming to export crops in order to meet increasing tax demands, needed little encouragement to rebel.

Rebel divisions​

It was not a unified revolt. While all wanted the British gone, notions of ‘Indian-ness’ were rare. Most of the sepoys hoped to restore Mughal rule under Bahadur Shah. But the inhabitants of Oudh wanted their Nawab back, and the people of Jhansi wanted their old state restored.

The revolt was also divided on religious lines. Most sepoys were Hindus, but other rebels were Muslims fighting a holy war.

More here.

Decisive events of the Indian Mutiny | National Army Museum

The 1857 rising was the biggest threat to Britain's colonial power during its rule of the Indian subcontinent.

www.nam.ac.uk

View attachment 22051

View attachment 22050

What was the British Raj?

The British Raj was the administration of India by Britain, the government having taken over that role from the East India Company after the Indian Rebellion.

www.britishempire.me.uk

Shocking. Only 35,000 British soldiers were enough to rule India...

So only the Bengalis really resisted the British?

@Lulldapull

 

[Bilal9]

Hendu-pak phaeg:

View attachment 22049

Understanding the Reversion of Domestic Pigs to Feral Pigs​

Definition of Feral Pigs​

Feral pigs are domestic pigs that have escaped or been released into the wild. They live as wild animals and can also include hybrids with wild boars. Over time, these pigs can develop characteristics similar to their wild ancestors.

Process of Reversion​

Domestic pigs can quickly revert to feral traits within just a few generations. This transformation includes:

• Physical Changes: Their coats may change color, and they can develop tusks.
• Behavioral Changes: Feral pigs tend to become more aggressive compared to their domestic counterparts.

Factors Contributing to Reversion​

Several factors influence the reversion of domestic pigs to feral pigs:

• Escape from Captivity: Damage to fences, such as from wildfires, can lead to pigs escaping into the wild.
• Rapid Reproduction: Feral pigs reproduce quickly, with sows capable of having multiple litters each year, leading to a swift increase in population.

Environmental Impact​

Feral pigs can cause significant ecological damage. They are opportunistic omnivores, primarily consuming plant matter but also preying on small animals. Their foraging behavior disrupts local ecosystems, making it difficult for native plants and animals to thrive.

Conclusion​

The reversion of domestic pigs to feral pigs is a rapid process influenced by environmental factors and their reproductive capabilities. This transformation poses challenges for ecosystems and agriculture, highlighting the importance of managing feral pig populations effectively.

 

[Bilal9]

Shocking. Only 35,000 British soldiers were enough to rule India...

So only the Bengalis really resisted the British?

@Lulldapull

Yes - this was largely the case, and then - mostly led by High Caste Bengalis (both Hindu and Muslim) who were better educated. But Bengal in those days included most of Eastern India, including UP, Punjab, Bihar, Orissa (Odisha). most of modern day Pakistan, Myanmar and most of the NE Seven Sister Indian states.

You see - most of India was still ruled by Princely states who paid tithes to the British. The British ruled a few pockets may be amounting to a total of 50%. This was divided into British ruled "presidencies" - such as the Bengal presidency, the Madras presidency, the Bombay presidency etc.

If you understand these historical demarcation lines drawn by the British (and why they marked them as such), a lot of the cultural demarcations of India will become clear to you.

Bengal Presidency - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Bilal9]

niice, this one will be visible from India !

Chandra Grahan 2025: When is the lunar eclipse and where can you see it in India? - The Times of India

Trending News: India will witness the second lunar eclipse of 2025, also known as Chandra Grahan, on September 7th. The total lunar eclipse will be visible across th

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

monsoon likely to play spoilsport, certainly across the deccan.

A blood moon is coming: Here's what you need to know about the total lunar eclipse on Sept. 7

Start preparing now to catch next month's dramatic total lunar eclipse.

www.space.com

 

[Sharma Ji]

A blood moon is coming: Here's what you need to know about the total lunar eclipse on Sept. 7

Start preparing now to catch next month's dramatic total lunar eclipse.

www.space.com

season here, even up north atm

 

[Sharma Ji]

 

[Vsdoc]

season here, even up north atm

Best season of the year.

Why the fkd up face.