General Whatever

Reply (Scroll)
Press space to scroll through posts
G General
General Whatever
12K
183K
More threads by ghazi

Superior civilization don't think that way. There are some values which are personal and are societal which whole society follows as a normal. What may not be pet will be pet for others. How can you be so sure that the you haven't drink the milk of cow whose beef you eat.

Your civilization is not superior in any way to its parent civilization.

In fact over millennia it has taken on a lot more of its contaminant hue than what it started off as.

We are not of your civilization. So why try to foist your new age Puranic ideation on to your daddies?

You do know rhat your Vedic daddies ate beef just as your Aryan Zoroastrian grand daddies did, right?
 
Bull hai, Krishna.. originally jisko revere kara jata tha.

How it came to cow, pata nahi, but then if you're a strict vegetarian dharmi, then all life is sacrosanct, right ?

Cow, Bull, Bhed, Bakra, Mor, Chidiyas, Machli, Murga.. jaan sab me hoti hai... why play favourites ?

@Krishna with Flute
Bull ko bhi venerate karte hue slay kiya jata hai.

Like your purer less gau belt chtyatic brothers in Nepal still do.
 
Yes, all life are sacred but as I said earlier, if we have grown up drinking her milk, you are under her obligation. Because you grew up consuming something which belongs to her children. She fed us along with her children, it is special. She is special amongst other animals. She shares your pain as well. If you have a pet cow in your house, if you are not well, she won't eat. If someone dies in house, she sheds tear. In west, where meat eating is very common, they don't ead dog's meat because of is human beings best friend. When it comes to cow, people gather to give sermon. Ever Arabs don't kill camel.
This is kattar mulla thinking.

Like the Egyptian mull cleric who said that to make a woman safe to strange men in her own home, she should allow them to suckle her breasts.

Thanks much Krishna.

Humko iss chtyape se door rakho.
 
Bull ko bhi venerate karte hue slay kiya jata hai.

Like your purer less gau belt chtyatic brothers in Nepal still do.
Yes, ritual sacrifice.

Even in Islam, halal ka concept ye hi hai.. yu supposed to rear and give it love, and develop feelings for the poor thing.. before you kill it.

Philosophically, impermanence waala hard lesson, exam practicals... that's the idea behind it.

Irl, however.. its a matter of show and pomp.. the 'ritual' has long since lost its meaning.

religion khatam hai, ghanta kisi ke dil me bhakti bhaav hai aaj ki date me.. sab dhongi madrchod.
 
im not an atheist, far from.. but ye religion peligion bakwaas waste of time hai..

burger khane ka mood hai toh kha lo, pijja pe papronee bhi dalva lo, extra !

chewtia ho gai hai dunia in this kalyug.
 
Yes, ritual sacrifice.

Even in Islam, halal ka concept ye hi hai.. yu supposed to rear and give it love, and develop feelings for the poor thing.. before you kill it.

Philosophically, impermanence waala hard lesson, exam practicals... that's the idea behind it.

Irl, however.. its a matter of show and pomp.. the 'ritual' has long since lost its meaning.

religion khatam hai, ghanta kisi ke dil me bhakti bhaav hai aaj ki date me.. sab dhongi madrchod.


Bull-slaying in ancient Persia is primarily linked to the pre-Zoroastrian religion of Mithraism, where it was central to the tauroctony myth, a depiction of the god Mithras sacrificing a bull to bring life-giving forces to the world. This ritual and symbolism later spread to the Roman Empire, where it was a key image in underground sanctuaries called Mithraea. The act signifies the transformation of life and the triumph of the spirit, with the bull's blood bringing forth wheat, wine, and the growth of herbs.

Mithraic Bull Sacrifice

The Symbolism:
The bull in Mithraism symbolized masculinity, strength, lunar and earthly forces, and fertility. Its slaying represented the creation of life and the cosmic renewal that sustained the world.

Origin:
This ceremony was likely a remnant of old Iranian paganism, pre-dating Zoroastrianism, which is suggested by Zarathustra's rejection of such sacrifices.

Roman Impact:
The cult of Mithras, with the bull-slaying image as its central symbol, became popular among soldiers in the Roman Empire, who identified with Mithras's victory.

Astronomical and Cosmic Significance:
The tauroctony also had astronomical connections, with the Sun god (often identified with Mithras) positioned in the Scorpio constellation while the bull is in Taurus.

Mithras and the Bull's Death

The Act:
In the tauroctony myth, the god Mithras holds the bull by the muzzle and stabs it behind the shoulder with a short sword.

The Result:
From the bull's spilled blood and body emerged wheat, wine, and the growth of useful herbs and plants.

The Snake:
The Indian-Persian god of evil, Ahriman, sends a snake to lick the blood and prevent the birth of the grape plant, but fails.

Cultural and Ritual Significance

Fertility and Abundance:
The bull's blood represented generative power, symbolizing the fertility and abundance necessary for life to flourish.

Salvation:
The act of Mithras slaying the bull was seen as a salvation for mankind, with soldiers who shed their blood for the Roman Empire identifying with Mithras.

Cycle of Life and Rebirth:
The myth highlighted themes of divine kingship, the sanctity of life, and the inescapable eternal cycle of death and rebirth that ordered the universe.
 
Last edited:
The base problem is two fold

1) Aadimanoos and their local regional ritual practices and deities. Apna hi australoid pantheon.

2) Hindu reformism and inorganic growth and "assimilation" of alien blood and practices. Puranic kaal 2000 years ago. And then most recently Adi Shankaracharya a thousand odd.
 
This is kattar mulla thinking.

Like the Egyptian mull cleric who said that to make a woman safe to strange men in her own home, she should allow them to suckle her breasts.

Thanks much Krishna.

Humko iss chtyape se door rakho.

Dur raho na bhai kaun invite karta hai? Upar se aise illogical parallel draw kar ne ki koshish.
 
The base problem is two fold

1) Aadimanoos and their local regional ritual practices and deities. Apna hi australoid pantheon.

2) Hindu reformism and inorganic growth and "assimilation" of alien blood and practices. Puranic kaal 2000 years ago. And then most recently Adi Shankaracharya a thousand odd.
So far peaceful coexistence chal rhi, things are ok only

 
Ok.

So before she became your wife, and before you were married and had no wide, they were all your mothers sisters and daughters right?

Do you know what that makes you?

Hindi mein usko mc bc ya beti chod bolte hain.

You are at your illogical best once again. Not every girl is in our contact to whom we consider our sister. To see every other women except wife is a moral which is taught. Anything other than that is deviation from that.
 
You are at your illogical best once again. Not every girl is in our contact to whom we consider our sister. To see every other women except wife is a moral which is taught. Anything other than that is deviation from that.
So you dont marry in your neighborhood and known people.

Kya lambi lambi cchod rahe ho bhai.

Mai yahan Scandinavian lagta hun tujhe?
 

Members Online

Latest Posts

Latest Posts

Back
Top