New Tweets

Atrocities of BSF/How BGB responds

Atrocities of BSF/How BGB responds
214
6K
More threads by Saif


Time for Delhi to stop playing border ploys, Dhaka to be bold
02 February, 2025, 00:00

THE installation of electric poles and searchlights by India’s Border Security Force within 50 yards of the zero line in the Patgram border in Lalmonirhat appears to be an insidious effort as the Joint India-Bangladesh Guidelines for Border Authorities of the Two Countries, or Border Guidelines, signed in 1975, does not allow the construction of structures within 150 yards from the zero line on each side of the border. The Coordinated Border Management Plan, which was signed in July 2011 and replaced the Border Guidelines, is said not to be different, in principle, from the guideline, but it is said to have made some significant deviations from the guideline in border management principles. Indian border forces of the Fulkadabri camp in the Cooch Behar district of West Bengal, installed the poles and searchlights, amidst heavy deployment, spanning a kilometre at night on January 30 in breach of the regulation, panicking people living in the area. Protest by a Border Guard Bangladesh patrol team stopped the installation. But, the Indian guards are reported to have ignored the call for a flag meeting between company commanders the next day.

The move at hand of the Indian border guards could well be construed as an attempt at discommoding the Bangladesh government, which is in a transitional phase, especially in view of a series of events have happened in the border with the direct involvement of India’s Border Security Force. Such events began in the final days of December 2024 with the erection of barbed-wire or electric fences along the border in Lalmonirhat, Chapainawabganj and Naogaon. Tension also brewed as the Indian guards on January 8 began erecting fences in the no man’s land. Indian forces tried to pick up a few Bangladeshis, harvesting wheat, at night on January 17, resulting in a scuffle, which rolled caused clashes involving several hundred villages of both Bangladesh and Indian the next morning, leaving three Bangladeshis wounded. Given that the director generals of the Bangladesh and the Indian border forces are scheduled to meet in New Delhi in February 17–20, with a focus on India’s erecting fences at several points along the border, there are ample reasons to believe that the January 30 incidents is part of a series of discommoding ploys of the Indian border forces that is unbecoming. Such events also endanger any efforts for improvement in bilateral relations, which have faced a setback because of India’s support for the authoritarian Awami League regime, toppled in a mass uprising on August 5, 2024.

Events creating border tension have also marked many occasions of border guard meetings between the two countries in the past. Delhi should understand that such events deepen an anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh. And, this is not welcome when both the neighbours are working to improve bilateral relations. Delhi should stop playing border ploys and Dhaka should adequately take up the issue with Delhi.​
 

Bangladesh-India border: more than a line
03 February, 2025, 00:00

1738538831334.png


THE implications of strained border relations extend beyond politics. Border communities bear the brunt of these tensions, with disrupted livelihoods and lost lives, writes Imran Hossain

THE Bangladesh-India border has always been more than just a physical demarcation. It is a complex intersection of history, culture, and shared livelihoods. Yet, in recent months, this boundary has increasingly become a flashpoint for disputes, threatening the hard-won equilibrium between the two neighbours. For both nations, the stakes are high — economically, politically, and socially. For the people living along the border, it is not just a geopolitical issue; it is about their homes, lands and future.

Fences and fractures

INDIA’S move to construct barbed wire fencing along multiple segments of the border has sparked anger and concern in Bangladesh. These actions violate the 1975 Memorandum of Understanding, which prohibits development within 150 yards of the zero line without mutual consent. While India argues that fencing is necessary to curb smuggling and unauthorised migration, the perspective from Dhaka is starkly different. Many Bangladeshis see it as a challenge to sovereignty and an erosion of trust. Resistance to the fencing — from Lalmonirhat to Chapainawabganj — has been mounting among Bangladesh’s Border Guard and local communities.

Even within India, the border fence remains a divisive topic. Critics, including former diplomats and academics, argue that it undermines the spirit of friendship and cooperation essential to Indo-Bangladeshi relations. The irony of promoting bilateral ties while building physical barriers has not gone unnoticed. While supporters claim the fence has reduced illegal activities, these arguments often ignore the human cost of division.

To grasp the current tensions, one must revisit the historical context of the border. The 1947 partition, which created East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), laid the foundation for today’s disputes. The hastily drawn Radcliffe Line left unresolved territorial claims and enclaves that remained contentious for decades. The 2015 land boundary agreement marked a significant milestone, resolving enclave issues and clarifying territorial boundaries. However, the agreement also highlighted the power imbalance between the nations, leaving many in Bangladesh feeling sidelined by India’s strategic priorities.

India’s domestic politics have further complicated the situation. The Bharatiya Janata Party has used border security as a platform to amplify nationalist rhetoric. Visits by BJP lawmakers to fencing sites and interactions with the Border Security Force are not just about strengthening security — they also stoke nationalist fervour. For Bangladesh, this political narrative has added new layers of tension. India’s focus on ‘securing the border’ often leaves Bangladesh feeling scapegoated for internal political gain. While nationalist rhetoric may win votes, its long-term impact on bilateral ties could be deeply damaging.

Cost of conflict

THE implications of strained border relations extend beyond politics. Border communities bear the brunt of these tensions, with disrupted livelihoods and lost lives. Farmers worry about losing access to land, traders face increased scrutiny, and families mourn loved ones killed in cross-border violence. Incidents like the tragic death of Felani Khatun in 2011 remain powerful reminders of the human toll.

Beyond the emotional and physical cost, economic fallout is a growing concern. Bilateral trade, valued at billions annually, risks being undermined by diplomatic discord. The psychological burden on border residents caught in the middle of these disputes is equally devastating.

Pathways to peace

RESOLVING these tensions requires diplomacy, cooperation, and community engagement. First, high-level dialogues must be prioritised to address immediate concerns and rebuild trust. Both nations need to reaffirm their commitment to existing agreements and create mechanisms to prevent future violations.

Second, fostering collaboration between the Border Guard Bangladesh and the Indian Border Security Force is vital. Regular communication, joint patrols, and training exercises can build confidence and reduce misunderstandings.

Third, the voices of border communities must be heard. Awareness campaigns and conflict resolution programmes can empower residents to mediate tensions and foster cooperation. Addressing unclear territorial demarcations through joint surveys and committees could also resolve long-standing disputes.

Finally, political leaders on both sides must exercise restraint in using border issues as a tool for electoral gains. True security stems not from fences or rhetoric but from mutual respect and collaboration.

While historical disputes and current tensions have tested relations, the potential for cooperation remains immense. By focusing on equitable policies and community-driven approaches, both nations can transform the border from a source of division into a gateway for shared prosperity. The time for action is now — for the millions whose lives depend on peace and stability along this vital frontier.

Imran Hossain is a lecturer in business administration at the Rabindra Maitree University.​
 
@Saif bhai,

BDR massacred over 400 BSF and NSG Black Cat commandos in the Boraibari episode when Indians tried to invade Bangladesh. I don't think even Pakistanis have fought this type of conflict with Indians with these types of outcomes.

Here is a recount session. I'm sure you've posted it before, I haven't looked hard enough.

BSF and Indian MEA should be told - that if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.

 
Last edited:

BSF accused of beating Bangladeshi farmer to death at Chapainawabganj border
UNB
Published :
Feb 07, 2025 20:04
Updated :
Feb 07, 2025 20:04

1738973370768.png


A Bangladeshi farmer was allegedly beaten to death by India’s Border Security Force (BSF) while irrigating farmland near the Raghunathpur border in Shibganj upazila of Chapainawabganj district on Friday.

The deceased, Barikul Islam, 36, was a resident of Namojgnathpur in Durlavpur union, said locals.

Saidur Rahman, a member of ward-9 of Durlavpur Union Parishad, said Barikul and several other farmers went to irrigate their fields near the border in the morning when BSF members from Bajitpur camp in Murshidabad area chased them.

While others managed to flee, Barikul was reportedly detained by the BSF personnel, who allegedly beat him to death and dumped his body on a riverbank inside Indian territory, Saidur claimed.

The body remains there, he added.

However, the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) has yet to confirm the incident.

“We have no such information so far, and the victim’s family has not reached out to us,” Lt Col Monir-uz-Zaman, commander of the BGB’s 53rd Battalion in Chapainawabganj, told UNB.

“We are looking into the matter,” he added.​
 

BSF removes CCTV camera along Kurigram border after commander-level meeting
Correspondent
Kurigram
Published: 12 Feb 2025, 12: 02

1739345179741.png


Photo shows a CCTV camera on a tree set up by the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) in the South Bashnjani-India border in Bhurungamari upazila of Kurigram on 11 February 2025.Prothom Alo

India’s Border Security Force (BSF) have finally removed the CCTV camera, installed along the Bangladesh-India border in South Bashjani of Bhurungamari upazila in Kurigram.

The CCTV camera installed on a tree was taken away after 11:00 pm on Tuesday.

Kurigram 22 Border Guard Bangladesh battalion commode Lt. Col. Muhammad Madsudur Rahman confirmed the matter to Prothom Alo.

Earlier, BSF set up the CCTV camera on a tree on the Indian side of the no man's land next to the 9 S sub-pillar of international border pillar no. 978 on Monday morning.

The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) subsequently protested the act, which was followed by several flag meetings between the border guards of the two countries at camp and company commander levels, but the matter remained unresolved.

Later on Tuesday afternoon, a commander-level flag meeting was held between both sides on where BSF agreed to remove the CCTV camera, and they did so after 11:00 pm.

Shamim Hossain from Bashjani village told Prothom Alo, “BSF removed the CCTV at night after a commander level meeting between both sides, and we also removed the tin-made fence that we erected previously for a mosque at the border of the both countries.”

Lt. Col. Muhammad Masudur Rahman said a decision was taken to get rid of the CCTV camera from the Bashjani border area after the BGB-BSF company level meeting, as well as a decision was also reached to raise no concrete structure within the 150 yards of zero line.​
 

BSF removes CCTV camera along Kurigram border after commander-level meeting
Correspondent
Kurigram
Published: 12 Feb 2025, 12: 02

View attachment 14308

Photo shows a CCTV camera on a tree set up by the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) in the South Bashnjani-India border in Bhurungamari upazila of Kurigram on 11 February 2025.Prothom Alo

India’s Border Security Force (BSF) have finally removed the CCTV camera, installed along the Bangladesh-India border in South Bashjani of Bhurungamari upazila in Kurigram.

The CCTV camera installed on a tree was taken away after 11:00 pm on Tuesday.

Kurigram 22 Border Guard Bangladesh battalion commode Lt. Col. Muhammad Madsudur Rahman confirmed the matter to Prothom Alo.

Earlier, BSF set up the CCTV camera on a tree on the Indian side of the no man's land next to the 9 S sub-pillar of international border pillar no. 978 on Monday morning.

The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) subsequently protested the act, which was followed by several flag meetings between the border guards of the two countries at camp and company commander levels, but the matter remained unresolved.

Later on Tuesday afternoon, a commander-level flag meeting was held between both sides on where BSF agreed to remove the CCTV camera, and they did so after 11:00 pm.

Shamim Hossain from Bashjani village told Prothom Alo, “BSF removed the CCTV at night after a commander level meeting between both sides, and we also removed the tin-made fence that we erected previously for a mosque at the border of the both countries.”

Lt. Col. Muhammad Masudur Rahman said a decision was taken to get rid of the CCTV camera from the Bashjani border area after the BGB-BSF company level meeting, as well as a decision was also reached to raise no concrete structure within the 150 yards of zero line.​

These dehati uneducated BSF idiots try their luck all the time, sometimes in complete violation of international law. Just flagrant Dadagiri attitude, thinking they will get away with it. Well fortunately those cowardly Hasina days are over.

I think we can start a tariff regime of our own - like Trump.

For every Bangladeshi person killed illegally at the border by BSF, we should raise our tariff imposed on Indian goods 1%.

I think this is entirely fair and Indians should be fine with it.

When it goes past 50% - you see what happens. :)

Failing that - we can conduct another Boraibari episode - BSF needs this lesson every decade seems like.
 

Staff online

Members Online

Latest Posts

Back
PKDefense - Recommended Toggle Create