World Chinese planned, funded and executed international Chinese humiliation. Backfiring of Proxy war with India through Pakistan.

[Krishna with Flute]

How Op Sindoor exposed Pakistan air defence, Chinese armaments​

The operation serves a warning to nations relying on Chinese military hardware as India's advanced capabilities continue to reshape the regional power balance​

Pakistan's military vehicles carrying missiles Nasr (R) and Babur (L) take part in the military parade to mark Pakistan's National Day in Islamabad on March 25, 2021. (Photo by Aamir Qureshi / AFP)


Pradip R. Sagar
UPDATED: Jun 10, 2025 18:37 IST
Edited By: Ashish Mukherjee

In Short​

• India's Operation Sindoor exposed major flaws in Pakistan's air defence systems.
• Pakistani HQ-9 and HQ-16 missiles failed against India's BrahMos and SCALP missiles.
• Chinese analysts criticised Pakistan's poor training and system integration.

India’s decisive strategic and operational triumph in Operation Sindoor has laid bare critical weaknesses in Pakistan’s military, which is heavily reliant on Chinese-supplied technology. A month after the conflict, which ended with Pakistan seeking a ceasefire within four days, a critical review of the operation has highlighted the inadequacy of Pakistan’s air defence systems, particularly the Chinese-made HQ-9 and HQ-16, against India’s advanced missile technology and electronic warfare capabilities.

Military observers claim Pakistan’s $3 million-per-unit HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system, touted as a cornerstone of its air defence, failed miserably to detect or intercept India’s BrahMos and SCALP missiles.

advertisement

Chinese defence analysts and social media lambasted Pakistani personnel as “mute spectators”, pointing to operational inefficiencies and lack of skill as key contributors to the debacle.

Analysis also established that Indian forces, leveraging superior missile technology, satellite intelligence and electronic warfare, penetrated Pakistan’s defences with ease, targeting key military installations. Indian loitering munitions humiliated Pakistan’s air defence network by destroying several HQ-9 batteries, exacerbating losses of fighter jets, surveillance aircraft, drones and radar sites


On May 15, Air Vice Marshal Aurangzeb Ahmed of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) admitted that the BrahMos missile’s unpredictable trajectory rendered it nearly impossible to intercept, a statement echoed by Chinese Communist Party outlets. The HQ-9’s failure stemmed from technical limitations, poor integration into Pakistan’s defence network and inadequate operator training.

Chinese analysts have criticised Pakistan's deployment of the HQ-9 air defence system, citing inadequate training, poor network integration, and lack of real-time coordination as key factors in its failure. The HQ-9's design, influenced by older Russian systems like the S-300, has raised concerns about its reliability against modern, high-speed missiles.

advertisement
Despite upgrades, the system underperformed against Indian missile technology, sparking doubts about Chinese defence exports' credibility and the HQ-9's effectiveness in high-intensity conflicts.

This critique highlights the challenges of deploying advanced defence systems, particularly when training and integration are inadequate. The HQ-9's performance has implications for China's defence export reputation and the system's viability in modern warfare scenarios.

The HQ-9B, with a reduced engagement range of 250-300 km, and the truck-mounted HQ-16, with limited mobility, proved ill-equipped to counter supersonic, low-flying missiles like the BrahMos. These shortcomings echo past failures, including India’s unopposed 2019 Balakot airstrike and a 2022 incident where a BrahMos missile, accidentally fired by India, penetrated deep into Pakistani territory undetected.

Operation Sindoor also saw India’s air defence systems and electronic warfare capabilities neutralise Pakistan’s drone fleet, crippling its offensive and surveillance operations. In response, Pakistan is planning to bolster its drone arsenal with Chinese Wing Loong series combat drones, aiming to establish a dedicated drone brigade.

Stung by the defeat, Pakistan is aggressively pursuing military modernisation, doubling down on Chinese and Turkish technology while diversifying with a $9 billion arms deal with Russia. The proposed Russian package includes tanks, air defence systems, warships, Mi-26T2 combat helicopters, and possibly MiG-35 fighter jets.

advertisement

Pakistan is also set to acquire China’s HQ-19 ballistic missile defence system and 40 J-35A stealth fighters starting 2026, alongside efforts to improve operator training and coordination to address multi-layered threats.

The HQ-9’s dismal performance has not only exposed Pakistan’s operational deficiencies but also dented China’s reputation as a reliable arms exporter. Modelled partly on Russia’s S-300, the HQ-9 and its variants have been questioned for their effectiveness against modern, high-speed, precision-guided missiles, raising doubts about their reliability in high-intensity conflicts.

India’s dominance in Operation Sindoor underscores its technological and strategic edge even as Pakistan scrambles to rebuild its shattered defences. The conflict serves as a warning to nations relying on Chinese military hardware as India’s advanced capabilities continue to reshape the regional power balance.

Subscribe to India Today Magazine

How Op Sindoor exposed Pakistan air defence, Chinese armaments

The operation serves a warning to nations relying on Chinese military hardware as India’s advanced capabilities continue to reshape the regional power balance

www.indiatoday.in

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/...medium=web&t_content=footerstrip-2&t_psl=True

 

[Sharma Ji]

Russian bike enthusiast test drives Bajaj pulsar 200 and Chinese Lifan 200.

He Says that if Chinese bike improves breaking, handling and engine performance, it can be a bike for beginners.

He said that pulsar is highly maneuverable. It is a dream bike. If a thought comes in your mind to turn the bike, it takes turn. Excellent breaking. This bike is for hooliganism. The only issue with the bike is that you crash it in enthusiasm of fast driving. No comparison between the two. He said Pulsar 200 has Japanese and German quality at Chinese price.

The difference between substandard Chinese quality and world beating Indian quality.

@Vsdoc

 

[Krishna with Flute]

Pantagon report on substandard Chinese weapons.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

The most important aspect of this conflict was that after the first skirmish on 6 th might, India exercise total air dominance. When Indian planes air born on 9 th and 10 th, none of the Pakistani plane airborne to counter Indian planes which bombed 11 Pakistani air base, 9 other small airbases, 2 nuke sites because India exercise SEAD, Suppression of enemy air defence. Forget about shooting Indian planes, the didn't air born to counter Indian planes. The reason is Chinese planes. What is the role of Chinese planes in war? You need to arrange to hide them.

 

[Krishna with Flute]

J 10 and JF 17 couldn't even airborne on 9 th and 10th to counter massive Indian Air attack which demolished 11 Pakistani air bases. Pakistan shift them far away and hide them to save them from the attack of mighty Indian planes. On 7th, What J10c could target was sand of Rajasthan. 5 PL 15s found u exploded. They are dismantled and data is share with Japan and US. China has requested to return it citing UN convention. Great humiliation of China as usual.

We have successfully tested long range anti ship hyper sonic cruise missile. We shall target Chinese ships in South China sea from Indian soil.

Stop making those jumk ships. We shall require only one missile to send them to the bottom of the see like your nuke submarine which is resting in the bottom of the sea.